Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.426953Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models
As of 21 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 36 of 36 outbound references and 4 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2505.13774.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-05T13:40:58.274985Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-11T11:16:03.303665Z
Reference resolution
36 of 36 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy8
- unresolved28
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation 180ed1c2-402c-4c37-a06f-214f6bc498ca · outbound
This paper cites Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Faithfulness vs. Plausibility: On the (Un)Reliability of Explanations from Large Language Models
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.290531Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 09e8b36f-5b37-48aa-b2dc-3dc0f300879c · outbound
This paper cites Claude 3.7 sonnet system card.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Claude 3.7 sonnet system card
Reference 2
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.295149Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 34c1dd22-d3b5-4e4d-bc39-676eeb569201 · outbound
This paper cites Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Chain-of-Thought Reasoning In The Wild Is Not Always Faithful
Reference 3
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.298997Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 77de9039-6502-41bf-a255-06d87bedf54d · outbound
This paper cites Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanations
Reference 4
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.303928Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 2d40209e-5118-41dd-a464-adbac0917f02 · outbound
This paper cites Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Monitoring Reasoning Models for Misbehavior and the Risks of Promoting Obfuscation
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.308198Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b22d84a6-ed08-4bf0-bcdf-323d9f46874d · outbound
This paper cites Reasoning models don’t always say what they think.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Reasoning models don’t always say what they think
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.908792Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation d5c304b5-0ab3-438d-ad9b-0814d8cde3eb · outbound
This paper cites Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language Explanations.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Do Models Explain Themselves? Counterfactual Simulatability of Natural Language Explanations
Reference 7
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.316054Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation be611117-1179-47ae-8c47-1f4361c5a698 · outbound
This paper cites Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Are DeepSeek R1 And Other Reasoning Models More Faithful?
Reference 8
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.319908Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d7524a57-ff57-4bbc-8d8c-45020960caec · outbound
This paper cites Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Cognitive Behaviors that Enable Self-Improving Reasoners, or, Four Habits of Highly Effective STaRs
Reference 9
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.324673Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ff84b833-00c3-4027-86ae-9077de8d2abc · outbound
This paper cites Are We Done with MMLU?.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Are We Done with MMLU?
Reference 10
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.328082Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 676e1310-73f4-422b-810d-d2c0efafab99 · outbound
This paper cites DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs via Reinforcement Learning
Reference 11
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.331856Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 04280e3e-e42f-4dd6-96c5-464770b080b9 · outbound
This paper cites Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning?.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Can Large Language Models Detect Errors in Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning?
Reference 12
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.335305Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 4d8e926b-da02-4ab7-b2ac-6a6f3058a5bb · outbound
This paper cites Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understanding
Reference 13
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.339129Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 954a10ba-9621-4d09-996a-cc4a790ad7ab · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Unresolved cited work
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.894444Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation ffa26ccd-20ab-45cc-b2ff-6a8cf947a190 · outbound
This paper cites OpenAI o1 System Card.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models OpenAI o1 System Card
Reference 15
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.346753Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation fe3bdae5-dd59-4cf1-ab0d-2f5e22cdf334 · outbound
This paper cites Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training
Reference 16
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.350010Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 71115129-531f-45b2-aa7d-81532a1c224b · outbound
This paper cites Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Measuring Faithfulness in Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Reference 17
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.353851Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation bc740fec-8a73-49e0-88cc-b5d23f55ed70 · outbound
This paper cites Deepseek-r1 thoughtology: Let’s< think> about llm reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07128, 2025.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Deepseek-r1 thoughtology: Let’s< think> about llm reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.07128, 2025
Reference 18
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.358379Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation f8be1fde-4913-4d0b-b731-03b5161b69d0 · outbound
This paper cites Openai o3-mini system card, 2025.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Openai o3-mini system card, 2025
Reference 19
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.881569Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation 23665c23-49a9-46d2-a464-8e8be3187dcd · outbound
This paper cites Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Gpqa: A graduate-level google-proof q&a benchmark
Reference 20
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.365513Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1837272f-d26e-473d-a771-f5df8ef09d57 · outbound
This paper cites On the hardness of faithful chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models, 2024.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models On the hardness of faithful chain-of-thought reasoning in large language models, 2024
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.863620Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation 6170b7d5-2f72-44ad-b10e-eb7df06f0933 · outbound
This paper cites Qwen3, April 2025.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Qwen3, April 2025
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.372113Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 559eca07-c3e8-4c0f-915f-34ebca8f758a · outbound
This paper cites Language models don’t always say what they think: Unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompting.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:74952–74965, 2023.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Language models don’t always say what they think: Unfaithful explanations in chain-of-thought prompting.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36:74952–74965, 2023
Reference 23
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.375670Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 08edc20c-6720-4b79-8e12-a0e7bfd0a50c · outbound
This paper cites Thoughts are all over the place: On the underthinking of o1-like llms, 2025.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Thoughts are all over the place: On the underthinking of o1-like llms, 2025
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.379149Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation ae1cc333-b203-444a-85ab-89c5e24c75a0 · outbound
This paper cites Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Chi, Quoc V Le, and Denny Zhou
Reference 25
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.382460Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b6f3aa6b-0698-4cef-a95f-f9b04bfcf147 · outbound
This paper cites Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Effectively Controlling Reasoning Models through Thinking Intervention
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.386011Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 421c5a21-ffa4-4c50-857d-3f51eeaaf7cd · outbound
This paper cites Dynamic early exit in reasoning models, 2025.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Dynamic early exit in reasoning models, 2025
Reference 27
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.390632Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b2c17e41-24d1-407d-922d-536833e06d41 · outbound
This paper cites Dissociation of Faithful and Unfaithful Reasoning in LLMs.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Dissociation of Faithful and Unfaithful Reasoning in LLMs
Reference 28
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.393940Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 28e89627-5a55-4984-a927-aef5d81f7385 · outbound
This paper cites ‘json { “perturbed_option.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models ‘json { “perturbed_option
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.823096Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation e6913a7e-b35e-469c-862f-1269869fcdc8 · outbound
This paper cites EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED
Reference 31
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.799510Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation b6004830-518f-4290-999d-c6890e2b9e1a · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Unresolved cited work
Reference 32
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.786839Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation c3a677ba-125c-4c57-9d50-d9484502c829 · outbound
This paper cites EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED
Reference 33
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.773528Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation a4f29cec-b128-4afd-8e38-b865fa1fc2ea · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Unresolved cited work
Reference 34
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.760714Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation 58b87729-4033-4c3a-a41a-ec2482933956 · outbound
This paper cites EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED
Reference 35
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.747459Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation d0ca7ea5-c00f-46c3-a6a0-be65dcbd3da7 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models Unresolved cited work
Reference 36
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.811928Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation 8b170b2c-2e20-41ba-9b3f-fbf88a4689c0 · outbound
This paper cites EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED.
Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models EXPLICITLY_CORRECTED
Reference 37
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-15T20:14:41.735428Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Pith citing papers
Observation df660e94-2abd-4754-be99-949a2751cd90 · inbound
A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models cites this paper.
A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthiness in Reasoning with Large Language Models Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models
Reference 78
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T10:39:04.273817Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 7729dbc3-4d62-424b-b6a5-fa630867821b · inbound
FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning cites this paper.
FACT-E: Causality-Inspired Evaluation for Trustworthy Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models
Reference 44
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-11T11:16:03.312937Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation 23ad4e73-b7ef-42c6-89ad-399ff2c6e743 · inbound
LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought cites this paper.
LLM Reasoning Is Latent, Not the Chain of Thought Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models
Reference 31
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-10T08:53:04.637091Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-21T06:32:19.484+00:00.
Observation a20b96d2-668e-4fd7-917e-c93fd6d2546b · inbound
Risky Business: Measuring The Faithfulness-Safety Tension cites this paper.
Risky Business: Measuring The Faithfulness-Safety Tension Measuring the Faithfulness of Thinking Drafts in Large Reasoning Models
Reference 41
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-05T13:40:58.274985Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.