Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 42 references

Wiggly dilaton: a landscape of spontaneously broken scale invariance

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Wiggly dilaton potential hosts a landscape of vacuum scales

desk verdict A concrete, honest 5D construction of a wiggly dilaton potential with multiple vacua; the central mass scaling rests on a single-field approximation that the authors themselves flag for follow-up. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.16304 v2 pith:APQDRFNN submitted 2024-11-25 hep-th hep-ph

Sudhakantha Girmohanta , Yuichiro Nakai , Yu-Cheng Qiu , Zhihao Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thhep-ph
keywords dilatonradionspontaneousscale-invariancebreakingaxion-likefieldwarpedextradimensionrelaxionGoldberger-Wisemechanismholography
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that a five-dimensional warped model with a bulk axion-like scalar field—whose mass is naturally suppressed by a small parameter $\epsilon$ and whose boundary potentials are periodic—produces a dilaton/radion potential that wiggles and has many local minima instead of a single stabilized value. Each minimum corresponds to a different scale for physics on the infrared brane, so the shape of the potential directly controls the hierarchy of scales a 4D observer would see. Depending on a small perturbation $\sigma$ of the infrared brane tension, the same mechanism yields a relaxion-style cascade of decreasing vacuum energies or a global minimum with an anomalously light dilaton. The authors also show that making the dilaton arbitrarily light requires fine-tuning, because the region of parameter space that gives a light dilaton narrows as $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon_1$ shrink.

What carries the argument

The central device is a matched approximate solution in which the bulk is split into a running region near the ultraviolet brane, where the axion profile is $\tilde v_0 z^{-\epsilon}$, and a condensate region near the infrared brane, with the two matched at the boundary of the regions. The matching produces $\beta(\chi)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{3}}(\tilde v_1-\tilde v_0\chi^{-\epsilon})$; the soft periodic boundary potential then forces $\tilde v_1$ to shift so that $\beta$ becomes a small sinusoid in $\chi$. Inserting this $\beta$ into the boundary effective action gives $V_{\rm eff}(\chi)=\chi^4 F[\beta(\chi)]$, which is what carries the wiggles and the array of minima; the mass scale is set by the small prefactors $\epsilon$ and $\epsilon_1$.

What would settle it

A numerical integration of the full five-dimensional equations of motion—without the running/condensate split—for one of the paper's benchmark parameter sets would settle it: if the effective potential has only a single minimum, or if the radion mass-to-VEV ratio scales as $\sqrt{\epsilon}$ rather than $\epsilon$, the wiggly-landscape claim fails. The authors identify the missing calculation themselves: a coupled dilaton-axion fluctuation analysis.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that once the conventional hard (Dirichlet) boundary condition for the stabilizing scalar is replaced by soft, periodic boundary potentials, the effective radion potential takes the form $V_{\rm eff}(\chi)=\chi^4 F[\beta(\chi)]$ with $\beta(\chi)\simeq \frac{\epsilon_1}{8\sqrt{3}}\sin(v_1-\tilde v_0\,\chi^{-\epsilon})$. Because $\beta$ is a sinusoidal function of $\chi^{-\epsilon}$, the potential crosses zero repeatedly, producing infinitely many locally stable vacua at $\langle\chi\rangle^{(p)}=(\tilde v_0/(v_1-2\pi p))^{1/\epsilon}$. For a tuned infrared brane tension ($\sigma=0$) all these vacua are degenerate and the mass-to-VEV ratio is $\propto \epsilon\sqrt{\epsilon_1}$, parametrically lighter than the $\sqrt{\epsilon}$ scaling of the standard scalar-stabilization mechanism. For $\sigma>0$ the minima carry positive, increasing vacuum energy (a relaxion potential); for $\sigma<0$ the largest VEV is the global minimum and the dilaton is light, while stability of the whole potential requires $\sigma$ not too negative.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the approximate matching between a slowly running axion profile near the ultraviolet brane and a condensate near the infrared brane; if higher-order corrections or back-reaction from the axion on the warped geometry are not negligible over the full range of radion values, the wiggly potential and the $\epsilon$-linear mass suppression could disappear.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With $\sigma=0$ the model predicts an infinite tower of degenerate vacua at exponentially separated scales, with a radion mass-to-VEV ratio suppressed by $\epsilon\sqrt{\epsilon_1}$ rather than the usual $\sqrt{\epsilon}$.
  • With $\sigma>0$ the wiggly potential gives a sequence of positive-energy minima whose energy rises with the VEV, matching the relaxion idea: the Universe can cascade from larger to smaller electroweak scales through first-order phase transitions.
  • With $\sigma<0$ the largest VEV is the true vacuum and the dilaton is light, $m_\chi/\langle\chi\rangle\sim \epsilon\sqrt{\epsilon_1}$, but an extremely light dilaton requires a narrow parameter region and hence fine-tuning.
  • For sufficiently negative $\sigma$ the potential becomes unstable and the extra dimension collapses, fixing a critical $\sigma_{\rm crit}$ that shrinks as $\epsilon_1$ decreases.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the wiggly structure survives a full coupled dilaton–axion fluctuation analysis, the $\sigma=0$ degeneracy offers a concrete multiverse-style landscape of electroweak scales; the paper does not develop this implication.
  • The relaxion branch depends on a constant ultraviolet contribution to terminate the cascade, but the paper does not construct that contribution; a concrete relaxion model would need to specify it and check bubble-nucleation rates between adjacent minima.
  • The fine-tuning result suggests the mechanism shifts the tuning problem rather than removing it: the hierarchy is set by an exponent $1/\epsilon$, so tiny $\epsilon$ values needed for large hierarchies simultaneously squeeze the allowed $\sigma$ window.
  • A direct numerical computation of the full 5D fluctuation spectrum for one benchmark parameter set would be a sharper test of the $\epsilon$-linear mass formula than the analytic approximation used here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a 5D warped model in which the Goldberger-Wise scalar is an axion-like bulk field with a small bulk mass parameter ε and periodic, small boundary potentials. Using the CPR approximate bulk solution, the authors derive a radion/dilaton effective potential Veff(χ)=χ^4 F[β(χ)] whose quartic coupling oscillates. For a tuned IR brane tension (σ=0) the potential has an infinite set of degenerate minima at ⟨χ⟩^(p) = (\tilde v0/(v1−2pπ))^(1/ε); for σ>0 the minima have positive energy (relaxion-like), and for σ<0 a global minimum with a light dilaton exists. They report the mass-to-VEV ratio mχ/⟨χ⟩ ~ ε√ε1, parametrically smaller than the usual √ε scaling, and give a numerical stability boundary σcrit.

Significance. If the coupled fluctuation problem confirms the single-field result, this is a novel and potentially useful mechanism: periodic boundary potentials generate a landscape of scale-invariance-breaking vacua, and the dilaton mass suppression linear in ε is an improvement over the standard GW scaling. The construction is explicit and self-contained, with all free parameters identified (ε, ε1, \tilde v0, v1, σ) and the fine-tuning cost of an extremely light dilaton stated. The paper does not overclaim: it explicitly defers the coupled dilaton-axion fluctuation analysis and the 4D dual construction, and it presents the leading-order derivation transparently.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III and IV] The central quantitative result, Eqs. (27) and (33), is obtained as the second derivative of the single-field effective potential Veff(χ)=χ^4 F[β(χ)] of Eq. (20), with the radion treated as the only light degree of freedom. However, the 5D axion has a small bulk mass (ε k²) and nearly Neumann boundary potentials (small ε_i), so it supports an additional light KK mode. The physical mass eigenstates of the coupled radion-axion system need not coincide with the second derivative of Veff; mixing can shift the light eigenvalue away from Eq. (27) and could in principle destabilize some of the local minima of Eq. (26). The manuscript states in Sec. IV that a coupled fluctuation analysis is left for future work, but the headline claim of a dilaton mass suppressed by ε (rather than √ε) is not fully established until such an analysis is performed or the regime in which the single-field truncation is valid is identified.
  2. [Sec. III.A, Eq. (27)] Eq. (27) as written omits a factor of \tilde v0². Substituting Eq. (21) into Eq. (25) at η=1 yields (mχ/⟨χ⟩)^(p) = ε ε1^(1/2) \tilde v0² / (√6 |v1 − 2pπ|), equivalently ε ε1^(1/2) χ^(2ε)/√6. Since \tilde v0 is introduced as a free parameter and is not set to unity in the text, the displayed formula is only correct for the special choice \tilde v0 = 1 (used in the numerical examples). The parametric scaling in ε and ε1 is unaffected for O(1) \tilde v0, but the formula should be corrected or the assumption stated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (16a)] The argument of the logarithm in Eq. (16a) appears garbled in the rendered text; as printed it does not reduce to the running solution at β=0. Please ensure that the formula is typeset as (z^4 − χ^4 tanh β)/(z^4 + χ^4 tanh β).
  2. [Abstract and Sec. I] The statements 'mχ ∝ ε' in the abstract and introduction are shorthand; the precise result is mχ/⟨χ⟩ ∝ ε for O(1) values of \tilde v0. Please make this explicit.
  3. [Sec. II.B, Eq. (18a)] After the choice of \tilde v0 as a free parameter, it would be helpful to state explicitly that any \tilde v0 with |\tilde v0| ≤ ε0/(2ε) can be realized by a suitable ε0 and v0, so the inequality is a condition on ε0.
  4. [Sec. III.C, Figs. 5-8] The captions of Figs. 5-8 do not restate that the plots use the small-ε1 expression (21) for β; the text states this before Fig. 4, but adding it to the captions would prevent readers from interpreting the numerical maps as a test of the CPR approximation itself.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the wiggly dilaton potential and mass scaling are derived from the stated 5D action via the external CPR approximation, not assumed as inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation is self-contained. Starting from the explicit 5D action (1), the bulk potential (4), and the periodic brane potentials (6), it solves the bulk equations of motion using the CPR approximation taken from the external reference [34], including the matching condition (13). The effective potential Veff(χ)=χ^4 F[β(χ)] in eq. (20) is obtained by integrating the action (eqs. (7)-(8)) and solving the soft boundary conditions (18) for V1; the sinusoidal form of β(χ) in eq. (21) follows from a small-epsilon_1 expansion of the IR boundary condition, not from an assumed shape of Veff. The vacuum locations (26) and the mass-to-VEV ratio (27), (33) are then computed as derivatives of this derived Veff. No data are fitted, and no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. The self-citations (refs. [4], [12], [13], [28], [29], [33]) appear only as background motivation for axion quality and radion phenomenology and are not load-bearing for eqs. (20)-(33). The admitted limitation in Sec. IV that a coupled dilaton-axion fluctuation analysis is needed concerns the validity of the single-field CPR approximation; that is a correctness risk, not circularity. Hence no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All five continuous parameters are hand-set inputs; no data fitting occurs. The derivation depends on standard holographic dictionary and on three structural modeling assumptions: small axion mass, small periodic brane potentials, and validity of the CPR matched solution. No new fundamental entity is introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • epsilon (bulk axion mass parameter) = not fitted; chosen small (0.3 in figures)
    Controls the running profile a(z) = tilde_v0 z^(-epsilon), the vacuum spacing via (v1 - 2p pi)^(1/epsilon), and the dilaton mass scaling m_chi/VEV ~ epsilon sqrt(epsilon_1). Motivated as a marginally-relevant deformation but not derived.
  • epsilon_1 (IR brane potential coefficient) = not fitted; chosen small (0.2 in figures)
    Controls the wiggle amplitude through beta(chi) and Delta(beta), and the mass suppression factor sqrt(epsilon_1).
  • tilde_v0 (UV boundary value of axion) = not fitted; chosen (1 in figures)
    Replaces the UV potential parameters {epsilon_0, v0} via eq. (18a); sets the location of vacuum solutions through the denominator v1 - 2p pi.
  • v1 (IR brane phase offset) = not fitted; chosen (3.3 in figures)
    Sets the periodicity of the boundary potential and the allowed vacuum labels p through v1 - 2p pi; can be tuned to shift the landscape.
  • sigma (IR brane tension perturbation, xi = 1 + sigma) = not fitted; small (e.g. +/-1e-3, -0.02)
    Determines vacuum energies V_eff ~ sigma chi^4 and the sign-dependent behavior: positive sigma gives relaxion-like positive-energy minima, negative sigma gives a global minimum with a lighter dilaton. Also controls stability through sigma_crit.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption AdS/CFT duality: a 5D warped compactification with UV and IR branes is a valid description of a 4D nearly conformal field theory with spontaneous scale symmetry breaking, and the radion is the dilaton.
    Used throughout the Introduction and Setup to identify the radion potential with the dilaton potential.
  • ad hoc to paper The bulk scalar is an axion-like pNGB with naturally small mass epsilon and small periodic brane potentials (eq. (6)); the smallness is argued via a gauged Z_N symmetry with large N and axion quality.
    This is the central model input; it is motivated but not derived from a fully specified UV completion.
  • domain assumption The CPR matched solution, including the running/condensate decomposition and matching condition (13), remains valid for soft (non-Dirichlet) boundary conditions and for the full range of chi used.
    The effective potential (20) and the vacuum equation (22) rely on this approximation; corrections are not computed.
  • domain assumption The radial mode of the complex scalar phi is heavy and decouples, leaving only the axionic phase a dynamical.
    Stated in Sec. II footnote 4; if the radial mode is not decoupled, the background geometry and effective potential would change.
  • standard math The effective potential is obtained by integrating out the bulk fields and imposing the axion boundary conditions but not the T' boundary condition (5a), following the standard GW/CPR procedure.
    This is the standard way to derive the radion potential in the literature; the paper states this explicitly before eq. (8).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Wiggly dilaton: a landscape of spontaneously broken scale invariance." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/APQDRFNN

@misc{pith2026241116304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Wiggly dilaton: a landscape of spontaneously broken scale invariance},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/APQDRFNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.16304}
}
read the original abstract

The dilaton emerges as a pseudo-Nambu-Goldstone boson (pNGB) associated with the spontaneous breaking of scale invariance in a nearly conformal field theory (CFT). We show the existence of a wiggly dilaton potential that contains multiple vacuum solutions in a five-dimensional (5D) holographic formulation. The wiggly feature originates from boundary potentials of a 5D axion-like scalar field, whose naturally small bulk mass parameter corresponds to a marginally-relevant deformation of the dual CFT. Depending on the energy density of a boundary 3-brane, our model can provide a relaxion potential or generate a light dilaton. However, an extremely light dilaton requires fine-tuning.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.16304 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Sketch of the dilaton/radion effective potential [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The radion effective potential (eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The radion effective potential (eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. The critical point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The critical point [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The coupling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    This is approximately a pure AdS solution

    For the region close to the UV brane, 1 ≳ z ≫ χ, we have a(z) ∼ a0 and T ≈ −log z, where a0 is some UV boundary value. This is approximately a pure AdS solution

    work page

  2. [2]

    (3c) and the solution significantly de- viates from the pure AdS, which is reasonable because this region is close to the singularity δ

    For the region close to the IR brane, 1 ≫ z ≳ χ, 4T ′a′ dominates in eq. (3c) and the solution significantly de- viates from the pure AdS, which is reasonable because this region is close to the singularity δ. Therefore, the bulk can be decomposed into two regions. One is close to the UV brane where the solution remains close to the pure AdS, and the othe...

    work page

  3. [3]

    A larger VEV then corresponds to a larger vacuum energy as indicated by the solid line in Fig

    For σ > 0, the potential energy at every local min- imum is positive, ⟨Veff ⟩(p) > 0. A larger VEV then corresponds to a larger vacuum energy as indicated by the solid line in Fig. 2. This dilaton/radion poten- tial, together with a constant contribution from VUV, could be used for the relaxion scenario [16]. Sup- pose the Standard Model electroweak secto...

    work page

  4. [4]

    For σ < 0, the potential energy at every local min- imum is negative, ⟨Veff ⟩(p) < 0, and a larger radion VEV corresponds to a smaller energy, as shown in Fig. 3. This indicates that the potential Veff (χ) has a well-defined nonzero global minimum, which is the largest VEV at pcrit. The radion will be eventually stabilized at ⟨χ⟩(pcrit). Note that in this...

    work page

  5. [5]

    The effective quartic coupling of the dilaton potential F [β] depends on only the β explicitly (there is no explicit χ-dependence in F )

    (A8) This shows that the complete form of a bulk axion po- tential would lead to a similar behavior of β(χ) as given in the main text with a slightly different dependence on ˜v0 and v1. The effective quartic coupling of the dilaton potential F [β] depends on only the β explicitly (there is no explicit χ-dependence in F ). Therefore, the dila- ton potentia...

    work page

  6. [6]

    Csaki, M

    C. Csaki, M. L. Graesser and G. D. Kribs, Radion dynamics and electroweak physics , Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 065002 [ hep-th/0008151]

    arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Radion Phenomenology in Realistic Warped Space Models

    C. Csaki, J. Hubisz and S. J. Lee, Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 125015 [ 0705.3844]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Abu-Ajamieh, J

    F. Abu-Ajamieh, J. S. Lee and J. Terning, The Light Radion Window, JHEP 10 (2018) 050 [ 1711.02697]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    Girmohanta, Y

    S. Girmohanta, Y. Nakai, Y. Shigekami and K. Tobioka, Light dilaton in rare meson decays and extraction of its CP property, JHEP 01 (2024) 153 [ 2310.16882]

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    J. M. Maldacena, The Large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 231 [ hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. S. Gubser, I. R. Klebanov and A. M. Polyakov, Gauge theory correlators from noncritical string theory , Phys. Lett. B 428 (1998) 105 [ hep-th/9802109]

    1998 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv

    E. Witten, Anti-de Sitter space and holography , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2 (1998) 253 [ hep-th/9802150]

    1998 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Arkani-Hamed, M

    N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Porrati and L. Randall, Holography and phenomenology, JHEP 08 (2001) 017 [hep-th/0012148]

    2001 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Rattazzi and A

    R. Rattazzi and A. Zaffaroni, Comments on the holographic picture of the Randall-Sundrum model , JHEP 04 (2001) 021 [ hep-th/0012248]

    2001 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Randall and R

    L. Randall and R. Sundrum, A Large mass hierarchy from a small extra dimension , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3370 [ hep-ph/9905221]

    1999 arXiv

  8. [16]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Modulus stabilization with bulk fields , Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4922 [hep-ph/9907447]

    1999 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Fujikura, Y

    K. Fujikura, Y. Nakai and M. Yamada, A more attractive scheme for radion stabilization and supercooled phase transition, JHEP 02 (2020) 111 [1910.07546]

    2020 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Girmohanta, Y

    S. Girmohanta, Y. Nakai, M. Suzuki, Y. Wang and J. Xu, Note on warped compactification. Finite brane potentials and non-Hermiticity , JHEP 08 (2024) 229 [2404.05141]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Coradeschi, P

    F. Coradeschi, P. Lodone, D. Pappadopulo, R. Rattazzi and L. Vitale, A naturally light dilaton , JHEP 11 (2013) 057 [ 1306.4601]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Dvali and A

    G. Dvali and A. Vilenkin, Cosmic attractors and gauge hierarchy, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 063501 [hep-th/0304043]

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    P. W. Graham, D. E. Kaplan and S. Rajendran, Cosmological Relaxation of the Electroweak Scale , Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 221801 [ 1504.07551]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    R. S. Gupta, Z. Komargodski, G. Perez and L. Ubaldi, Is the Relaxion an Axion? , JHEP 02 (2016) 166 [1509.00047]

    2016 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Choi and S

    K. Choi and S. H. Im, Realizing the relaxion from multiple axions and its UV completion with high scale supersymmetry, JHEP 01 (2016) 149 [ 1511.00132]

    2016 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Fonseca, B

    N. Fonseca, B. Von Harling, L. De Lima and C. S. Machado, A warped relaxion, JHEP 07 (2018) 033 [1712.07635]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Hamada, E

    Y. Hamada, E. Kiritsis, F. Nitti and L. T. Witkowski, The Self-Tuning of the Cosmological Constant and the Holographic Relaxion, Fortsch. Phys. 69 (2021) 2000098 [2001.05510]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    K. I. Izawa, T. Watari and T. Yanagida, Higher dimensional QCD without the strong CP problem , Phys. Lett. B 534 (2002) 93 [ hep-ph/0202171]

    2002 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Di Luzio, E

    L. Di Luzio, E. Nardi and L. Ubaldi, Accidental Peccei-Quinn symmetry protected to arbitrary order , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017) 011801 [ 1704.01122]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Lillard and T

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait, A Composite Axion from a Supersymmetric Product Group, JHEP 11 (2017) 005 [1707.04261]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Lee and W

    H.-S. Lee and W. Yin, Peccei-Quinn symmetry from a hidden gauge group structure , Phys. Rev. D 99 (2019) 015041 [1811.04039]

    2019 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Lillard and T

    B. Lillard and T. M. P. Tait, A High Quality Composite Axion, JHEP 11 (2018) 199 [ 1811.03089]

    2018 arXiv

  23. [31]

    P. Cox, T. Gherghetta and M. D. Nguyen, A Holographic Perspective on the Axion Quality Problem , JHEP 01 (2020) 188 [ 1911.09385]. 10

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    M. Ardu, L. Di Luzio, G. Landini, A. Strumia, D. Teresi and J.-W. Wang, Axion quality from the (anti)symmetric of SU( N ), JHEP 11 (2020) 090 [2007.12663]

    2020 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Nakai and M

    Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki, Axion Quality from Superconformal Dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 816 (2021) 136239 [2102.01329]

    2021 arXiv

  26. [34]

    S. J. Lee, Y. Nakai and M. Suzuki, High quality axion via a doubly composite dynamics , JHEP 03 (2022) 038 [2112.08083]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Choi and T

    G. Choi and T. T. Yanagida, High quality axion in supersymmetric models, JHEP 12 (2022) 067 [2209.09290]

    2022 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Qiu, J.-W

    Y.-C. Qiu, J.-W. Wang and T. T. Yanagida, High-Quality Axions in a Class of Chiral U(1) Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 071802 [2301.02345]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Chaffey, S

    I. Chaffey, S. Fichet and P. Tanedo, Holography of broken U(1) symmetry , JHEP 05 (2024) 330 [2309.00040]

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Nakagawa, Y

    S. Nakagawa, Y. Nakai, M. Yamada and Y. Zhang, Dynamics of superconformal axion: Quality and scalegenesis, Phys. Lett. B 849 (2024) 138447 [2309.06964]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Bellazzini, C

    B. Bellazzini, C. Csaki, J. Hubisz, J. Serra and J. Terning, A Naturally Light Dilaton and a Small Cosmological Constant, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 2790 [1305.3919]

    2014 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Csaki, J

    C. Csaki, J. Erlich, C. Grojean and T. J. Hollowood, General properties of the selftuning domain wall approach to the cosmological constant problem , Nucl. Phys. B 584 (2000) 359 [ hep-th/0004133]

    2000 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Hebecker, Lectures on Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse , 2008.10625

    A. Hebecker, Lectures on Naturalness, String Landscape and Multiverse , 2008.10625

    2008 arXiv

  34. [42]

    W. D. Goldberger and M. B. Wise, Phenomenology of a stabilized modulus, Phys. Lett. B 475 (2000) 275 [hep-ph/9911457]

    2000 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.