Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 67 references

Laser spectroscopy illuminates the $N=32$ shell closure

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The magnetic moment of $^{53}$Ca sits within 1.1 percent of the single-particle value for a $2p_{1/2}$ neutron, while the charge-radius jump at $^{54}$Ca confirms a robust $N=32$ shell closure.

desk verdict New measurements of 53Ca moment and 53,54Ca radii are credible and significant; the shell-closure claim holds up, but the spin assumption needs explicit defense before final publication. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.10943 v1 pith:ATSJ4KIB submitted 2026-08-11 nucl-th physics.atom-ph

Tim E. Lellinger , Liss V. Rodriguez , Patrick Muller , Osama Ahmad , Mark L. Bissell , Klaus Blaum , Emily Burbach , Bradley Cheal
show 24 more authors
Till Fabritz Ronald F. Garcia Ruiz Matthias Heinz Jack Hughes Phillip Imgram Kristian Konig Yinshen Liu Bernhard Maass Edward N. Matthews Takayuki Miyagi Witold Nazarewicz Rainer Neugart Gerda Neyens Lukas Nies Wilfried Nortershauser Julian Palmes Peter Plattner Paul-Gerhard Reinhard Laura Renth Rodolfo Sanchez Achim Schwenk Julien Spahn Xiaofei Yang Deyan T. Yordanov
This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thphysics.atom-ph
keywords collinearlaserspectroscopymagneticdipolemomentchargeradiuscalciumisotopesN=32shellclosuresingle-particlestructurehyperfineradioactivebeams
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first laser-spectroscopy measurements of the neutron-rich calcium isotopes $^{53}$Ca and $^{54}$Ca, produced at rates below one ion per second. It finds that $^{53}$Ca's magnetic dipole moment deviates by only $1.1(9)\%$ from the single-particle Schmidt value for an odd neutron in the $2p_{1/2}$ orbital, the smallest such deviation seen anywhere in the nuclear chart. It also finds that the charge radius rises sharply from $^{53}$Ca to $^{54}$Ca, more steeply than from $^{52}$Ca to $^{53}$Ca. Together these observations are presented as strong evidence that $N=32$ is a robust shell closure, making $^{52}$Ca doubly magic-like and $^{53}$Ca an almost ideal single-particle system. This matters because shell closures at extreme neutron numbers are a testing ground for nuclear forces, and the result sharply constrains both ab initio and density-functional models.

What carries the argument

The measurement chain is built on the ROC technique, radioactive detection after optical pumping and state-selective charge exchange, which turns laser-induced population of metastable $3d_J$ states in Ca$^+$ into a neutralization-rate signal, allowing resonance spectra at beam rates below one ion per second. For $^{53}$Ca, whose ground state is split by the hyperfine interaction, a two-step optical-pumping scheme scans one hyperfine transition while a second laser section continuously pumps the $F=1\to F'=2$ transition, so all three allowed transitions contribute to the recorded spectrum. The hyperfine parameter $A_{\mathrm{lower}}$ extracted from that spectrum yields the magnetic moment through a ratio to the known moment of $^{43}$Ca; the isotope shifts yield charge radii through the mass-shift and field-shift factors $K = 409.2(5)\,\mathrm{GHz}\cdot u$ and $F = -276(8)\,\mathrm{MHz/fm^2}$. The interpretive benchmark is the single-particle Schmidt value for a $2p_{1/2}$ neutron; the argument is that only a robust shell closure can keep the ground state that pure.

What would settle it

A direct ground-state spin measurement of $^{53}$Ca, for example by nuclear magnetic resonance on an oriented sample, that returns $I=3/2$, $5/2$, or $7/2$ would invalidate the extracted magnetic moment and the $1.1\%$ single-particle claim; the charge-radius evidence for $N=32$ would, however, remain.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the neutron-rich calcium chain exhibits a robust shell closure at $N=32$. The evidence is two-fold. First, the hyperfine parameter of $^{53}$Ca gives a magnetic dipole moment of $0.630(7)(2)$ nuclear magnetons, which differs from the Schmidt limit for a $2p_{1/2}$ neutron by only $1.1(9)\%$, a purity of single-particle structure that the authors say is unmatched elsewhere in the nuclear chart, even compared with neighbours of the classic doubly magic nuclei. Second, the differential mean-square charge radii, $\delta\langle r_c^2\rangle^{40,53} = 0.576(20)(35)\,\mathrm{fm}^2$ and $\delta\langle r_c^2\rangle^{40,54} = 0.859(41)(38)\,\mathrm{fm}^2$, show a pronounced odd-even effect: $^{53}$Ca is nearly the same size as $^{52}$Ca while $^{54}$Ca is markedly larger, so the radius slope steepens after $N=32$. The paper interprets this combination as strong evidence for the $N=32$ closure and uses it to benchmark ab initio and density-functional calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The magnetic-moment interpretation assumes $^{53}$Ca's ground-state spin is $I=1/2$, a value adopted from theory because no experiment had measured it; if the true spin is different, the extracted moment and the near-Schmidt agreement would change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • $^{52}$Ca should be treated as a doubly magic-like closed-shell nucleus, with $^{53}$Ca as its single-neutron partner; the near-Schmidt moment is a direct observable signature of that closure.
  • The charge-radius kink at $N=32$ becomes a quantitative benchmark: any credible nuclear structure model must reproduce both the near-Schmidt moment of $^{53}$Ca and the steep radius rise at $^{54}$Ca.
  • The $1.1(9)\%$ deviation places $^{53}$Ca in a select group with $^{17}$O and $^{17}$F, suggesting that orbitals with very small degeneracy, like $2p_{1/2}$, are where single-particle purity should be sought.
  • The demonstrated sensitivity at about one ion per second opens the possibility of extending such measurements to $^{55,56}$Ca, directly testing whether the proposed $N=34$ closure behaves analogously.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If a future direct measurement confirms the $I=1/2$ spin of $^{53}$Ca, the single-particle interpretation becomes essentially airtight; if it finds a different spin, the extracted moment and the $1.1\%$ comparison would need to be re-derived, though the charge-radius evidence for $N=32$ would stand independently.
  • A testable extension is to look for the same near-Schmidt behaviour in a neighbouring $N=33$ isotone once beam yields permit; a similarly pure moment would show the effect is a property of the orbital and the shell gap, not of calcium alone.
  • The radius-slope comparison could be sharpened into a quantitative closure-strength indicator by measuring the same three-point radius indicator in other proposed closures, such as $N=32$ potassium, where the paper notes no clear magic behaviour appears.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper reports the first collinear laser spectroscopy measurements of the neutron-rich calcium isotopes 53Ca and 54Ca beyond N=32, using an upgraded ROC (Radioactive detection after Optical pumping and state-selective Charge exchange) technique that achieves sensitivity below 1 ion/s. From the hyperfine structure of 53Ca, the authors extract a magnetic dipole moment μ = 0.630(7)(2) μ_N, which they compare with the single-particle Schmidt value for a 2p1/2 neutron, finding a deviation of only 1.1(9)%. They also extract differential charge radii for 53Ca and 54Ca, and observe that the charge-radius slope from 53Ca to 54Ca exceeds that from 52Ca to 53Ca. The paper argues that these observations provide strong evidence for a robust shell closure at N=32, and compares the results with VS-IMSRG and density-functional-theory calculations.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, these measurements are highly significant. They establish a sensitivity record for fast-beam collinear laser spectroscopy, provide the first electromagnetic ground-state properties of 53Ca and 54Ca, and yield a unique empirical benchmark: a magnetic moment within 1% of the single-particle Schmidt value in a medium-mass nucleus. The charge-radius data add a new constraint on the evolution of shell structure. The paper also contains genuinely useful technical developments and an open data release. The comparison with ab initio and DFT calculations is a strength, and the uncertainty propagation is carefully described. The main risk is the model-dependent spin assignment for 53Ca, which is load-bearing for the central single-particle claim.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results; Methods, Eq. (2)] The 53Ca magnetic moment is extracted using Eq. (2) with an assumed ground-state spin I=1/2. The text states that this value was adopted from a theoretical prediction and that alternative assignments 3/2, 5/2, and 9/2 were excluded by comparing simulated hyperfine spectra, but no test for I=7/2 is reported. Because the hyperfine pattern, the fitted A_lower, and hence the moment all depend on I, the quoted 1.1(9)% agreement with the single-particle Schmidt value and the associated N=32 shell-closure claim are conditional on an unverified spin assignment. The authors should either (i) perform and report the full optical-pumping simulation for I=7/2 (and ideally a chi-square scan over all plausible spins), or (ii) present the magnetic moment and the strong-evidence statement as explicitly conditional on the theoretical spin, with a candid discussion of the resulting ambiguity. Without this, the central conclusion is not fully supported by the data.
  2. [Results; Methods, Systematic uncertainties] The hyperfine anomaly is dismissed with the statement that its estimated contribution (0.3%) is significantly smaller than the statistical uncertainty. However, 0.3% is equal to the reported systematic uncertainty of the magnetic moment (0.002 μ_N on 0.630 μ_N), and the headline deviation is only 1.1(9)%. The manuscript should explain how the 0.3% estimate was obtained and should either include it as a folded systematic uncertainty or justify its omission with a quantitative calculation or a literature value for the differential hyperfine anomaly. As written, the precision budget for the moment is not fully closed.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fitting and data analysis] There is a typo: 'The total measurement time for was about 20 h for 53,43Ca' — the word 'for' is repeated and the sentence is incomplete.
  2. [Figure 1 caption] 'The recorded spectra of 52,53,54Ca, plotted as the normalized asymmetry between atom and ion detector in the case of 52,54Ca and the number of detected atoms in the case of 53Ca' is slightly awkward; 'asymmetry' should be 'the asymmetry' for clarity.
  3. [Results] The phrase 'provides strong evidence for a robust shell closure at N=32' is used at the end of the Results section. Given that the magnetic-moment argument depends on the spin assignment, a more cautious formulation such as 'provides evidence, contingent on the I=1/2 assignment, for a robust shell closure' would better match the actual level of certainty.
  4. [Discussion] The claim that the 1.1(9)% Schmidt deviation is 'unique not only within the calcium isotopic chain but across the entire nuclear chart' is stronger than what is demonstrated by Fig. 2a, which shows a selected set of nuclei. At minimum, a systematic survey of the chart or a reference to an established compilation would be needed to support the word 'unique'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Central moment and radius measurements are self-contained; only the Fy(IVP) DFT reproduction of the new Ca data is partly fit-input, and the untested 7/2 spin is a limitation, not circularity.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Discussion, paragraph on differential radii versus DFT (around Fig. 3b)]
    "Both Fayans EDFs predict the trend above 48Ca well, whereby Fy(IVP) reproduces the new data for 53Ca and 54Ca. This, again, is achieved by the improved pairing terms in the Fayans EDF and including neutron-rich calcium isotopes in the EDF optimization."

    The paper presents Fy(IVP)'s agreement with the newly measured 53,54Ca radii as support for the shell-closure interpretation, but the same sentence attributes that agreement to including neutron-rich calcium isotopes in the EDF optimization. If the new 53,54Ca data are part of that optimization, the agreement is partly fixed by construction rather than an independent prediction. This is a peripheral circularity: the central shell-closure evidence from the measured magnetic moment, the generalized-seniority extrapolation, and the charge-radius kink at N=32 does not depend on this DFT reproduction.

full rationale

The central experimental derivation is self-contained. The 53Ca magnetic moment is obtained from the measured hyperfine A_lower via Eq. (2), using the literature ratio for 43Ca and the adopted spin I=1/2; the Schmidt comparison is parameter-free and nothing in that chain is fitted to the quoted 1.1(9)% deviation. The spin assumption is a real experimental-modeling caveat, especially since I=7/2 is not listed among the excluded alternatives, but it is not circular: A_lower is measured, and alternative spins were tested by forward simulation of hyperfine patterns. The charge-radius extraction via Eq. (3) uses literature mass- and field-shift factors, and the generalized-seniority curve is fit to 48-52Ca data before projecting beyond, so the 54Ca departure is a legitimate extrapolation. The VS-IMSRG calculations are independent ab initio calculations with documented uncertainties and are not used as the moment-extraction input. The only mild circular support is the DFT sentence stating that Fy(IVP)'s reproduction of the new 53,54Ca data is achieved by including neutron-rich calcium isotopes in the EDF optimization; to the extent those isotopes are in the fit, the agreement is partly by construction. This does not undermine the experimental claims, so the overall circularity is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced. The central experimental observables are derived directly from spectra using literature atomic constants. The main interpretative inputs are the spin assignment, the hyperfine-anomaly approximation, and the generalized-seniority model.

free parameters (1)
  • Generalized seniority coefficients a, b, c = not quoted numerically
    Fit to the differential charge radii of 48-52Ca using Eq. (5) and then used to project the radius trend to 54Ca; the 54Ca departure is interpreted as a shell-closure signature.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The ground-state spin of 53Ca is I=1/2, adopted from a theoretical prediction; spins 3/2, 5/2, and 9/2 are excluded by the absence of predicted hyperfine peaks in the recorded spectra.
    Entered in the Results section: 'a theoretical prediction of I = 1/2 was adopted as a starting point'. The extracted hyperfine parameter A_lower and the magnetic moment depend on this assignment.
  • domain assumption The hyperfine anomaly between 43Ca and 53Ca is negligible, with an estimated contribution of 0.3%.
    Stated in the Results section as smaller than the statistical uncertainty; if the anomaly were larger, the magnetic moment extracted via Eq. (2) would shift.
  • domain assumption The atomic mass-shift and field-shift factors K=409.2(5) GHz u and F=-276(8) MHz/fm2 from Garcia Ruiz et al. (2016) apply to 53,54Ca.
    Used in Eq. (3) to convert isotope shifts into differential charge radii; an error in F propagates directly into the radius values and the N=32 kink.
  • domain assumption The generalized seniority formula Eq. (5) captures the charge radius trend between N=28 and N=50 for the purpose of projecting the calcium chain.
    Used to fit 48-52Ca and project to 54Ca; the deviation of 54Ca from this curve is interpreted as evidence for a shell closure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Laser spectroscopy illuminates the $N=32$ shell closure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ATSJ4KIB

@misc{pith2026260810943,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Laser spectroscopy illuminates the $N=32$ shell closure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ATSJ4KIB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.10943}
}
abstract

Atomic nuclei are strongly correlated quantum many-body systems, and how their shell structure evolves with increasing neutron excess remains a central open question in nuclear physics. Calcium isotopes are an ideal testing ground: alongside the traditional magic numbers $N=20,28$, new shell closures have been proposed at $N=32,34$ ($^{52,54}\mathrm{Ca}$). While the charge radius rises rapidly towards $N=32$, further moments and radii in the isotopic chain have remained inaccessible due to the low production yield of a few ions per second. Here we apply a highly sensitive collinear laser spectroscopy technique, which reveals a strikingly simple behaviour: adding one neutron to $^{52}\mathrm{Ca}$ yields a pure single-particle magnetic dipole moment in $^{53}\mathrm{Ca}$, while the charge-radius slope towards $^{54}\mathrm{Ca}$ exceeds that towards $^{52}\mathrm{Ca}$. This provides strong evidence for a robust $N=32$ shell closure and stringently constrains nuclear structure models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Garcia Ruiz, R. F. et al. Unexpectedly large charge radii of neutron-rich calcium isotopes. Nat. Phys. 12, 594–598 (2016). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/nphys3645

    doi:10.1038/nphys3645 2016

  2. [3]

    & Ruiz, R

    Yang, X., Wang, S., Wilkins, S. & Ruiz, R. G. Laser spectroscopy for the study of exotic nuclei. Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.129, 104005 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp. 2022.104005

    arXiv 2023

  3. [4]

    Bonn, J., Huber, G., Kluge, H. J. & Otten, E. W. Sudden Change in the Nuclear Charge Distribution of Very Light Mercury Isotopes. Phys. Lett. B38, 308–311 (1972). URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(72)90253-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(72)90253-5 1972

  4. [5]

    Marsh, B. A. et al. Characterization of the shape-staggering effect in mercury nuclei. Nat. Phys. 14, 1163–1167 (2018). URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41567-018-0292-8

    doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0292-8 2018

  5. [6]

    de Groote, R. P. et al. Measurement and microscopic description of odd–even stagger- ing of charge radii of exotic copper isotopes. Nat. Phys. 16, 620–624 (2020). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-0868-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-020-0868-y 2020

  6. [7]

    Barzakh, A. E. et al. Inverse odd-even stag- gering in nuclear charge radii and possible octupole collectivity in 217,218,219At revealed by in-source laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. C 99, 054317 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.99.054317

    work page 2019

  7. [8]

    Campbell, P. et al. Laser Spectroscopy of Cooled Zirconium Fission Fragments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 082501 (2002). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.082501

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.082501 2002

  8. [9]

    Sels, S. et al. Shape staggering of midshell mercury isotopes from in-source laser spec- troscopy compared with density-functional- theory and monte carlo shell-model cal- culations. Phys. Rev. C 99, 044306 (2019). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevC.99.044306

    work page 2019

Show all 67 references
  1. [10]

    Papuga, J. et al. Shell structure of potas- sium isotopes deduced from their magnetic moments. Phys. Rev. C 90, 034321 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90. 034321

    2014 doi

  2. [11]

    de Groote, R. P. et al. Dipole and quadrupole moments of 73–78Cu as a test of the robustness of the Z = 28 shell closure near 78Ni. Phys. Rev. C 96, 041302 (2017). URL https://doi. 17 org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.041302

    2017 doi

  3. [12]

    Rodr ´ ıguez, L. V.et al. Doubly-magic char- acter of 132Sn studied via electromagnetic moments of 133Sn. Phys. Rev. C 102, 051301 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.102.051301

    2020

  4. [13]

    Vernon, A. R. et al. Nuclear moments of indium isotopes reveal abrupt change at magic number 82. Nature 607, 260– 265 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-022-04818-7

    2022

  5. [14]

    de Groote, R. et al. Measurements of binding energies and electromagnetic moments of sil- ver isotopes – a complementary benchmark of density functional theory. Phys. Lett. B848, 138352 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.physletb.2023.138352

    2024

  6. [15]

    Reinhard, P. G. & Nazarewicz, W. Toward a global description of nuclear charge radii: Exploring the Fayans energy density func- tional. Phys. Rev. C 95, 064328 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95. 064328

    2017 doi

  7. [16]

    Karthein, J. et al. Electromagnetic proper- ties of indium isotopes illuminate the doubly magic character of 100Sn. Nat. Phys.20, 1719– 1725 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41567-024-02612-y

    2024

  8. [17]

    L., Dobaczewski, J., Bonnard, J

    Sassarini, P. L., Dobaczewski, J., Bonnard, J. & Ruiz, R. F. G. Nuclear DFT anal- ysis of electromagnetic moments in odd near doubly magic nuclei. J. Phys. G 49, 11LT01 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1361-6471/ac900a

    2022

  9. [18]

    et al.Improved structure of calcium isotopes from ab initio calculations

    Heinz, M. et al.Improved structure of calcium isotopes from ab initio calculations. Phys. Rev. C 111, 034311 (2025). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevC.111.034311

    2025 doi

  10. [19]

    Miyagi, T. et al. Impact of two-body currents on magnetic dipole moments of nuclei. Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 232503 (2024). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.232503

    2024 doi

  11. [21]

    Gallant, A. T. et al. New precision mass mea- surements of neutron-rich calcium and potas- sium isotopes and three-nucleon forces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 032506 (2012). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.032506

    2012 doi

  12. [22]

    Wienholtz, F. et al. Masses of exotic cal- cium isotopes pin down nuclear forces. Nature 498, 346–349 (2013). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature12226. 18

    2013 doi

  13. [23]

    Steppenbeck, D. et al. Evidence for a new nuclear ’magic number’ from the level struc- ture of 54Ca. Nature 502, 207–210 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12522

    2013 doi

  14. [25]

    Chen, S. et al. Quasifree Neutron Knockout from 54Ca Corroborates Arising N = 34 Neu- tron Magic Number. Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 142501 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.123.142501

    2019

  15. [26]

    Garcia Ruiz, R. F. et al. Ground-state electro- magnetic moments of calcium isotopes. Phys. Rev. C 91, 041304 (2015). URL https://link. aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevC.91.041304

    2015 doi

  16. [27]

    Koszor´ us,´A. et al. Charge radii of exotic potassium isotopes challenge nuclear theory and the magic character of N = 32. Nat. Phys. 17, 439–443 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-020-01136-5

    2021

  17. [28]

    Stone, N. J. Table of recommended nuclear magnetic dipole moments: Part I – long-lived states. Tech. Rep. INDC(NDS)–0794, Interna- tional Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.61092/iaea. yjpc-cns6

    2019 doi

  18. [29]

    Miller, A. J. et al. Proton superfluidity and charge radii in proton-rich calcium isotopes. Nat. Phys. 15, 432–436 (2019). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41567-019-0416-9

    2019 doi

  19. [30]

    Malbrunot-Ettenauer, S. et al. Nuclear charge radii of the nickel isotopes 58−68,70Ni. Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 022502 (2022). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.022502

    2022 doi

  20. [31]

    Minamisono, K. et al. Charge radii of neutron deficient 52,53Fe produced by pro- jectile fragmentation. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 252501 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.117.252501

    2016

  21. [32]

    Silverans, R. E. et al. Nuclear charge radii of 78−100Sr by nonoptical detection in fast-beam laser spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2607– 2610 (1988). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.60.2607

    1988

  22. [33]

    Neugart, R. et al. Collinear laser spectroscopy at ISOLDE: new methods and highlights. J. Phys. G 44, 064002 (2017). URL https://doi. org/10.1088/1361-6471/aa6642

    2017 doi

  23. [34]

    & Silverans, R

    Vermeeren, L., Lievens, P., Buekenhoudt, A. & Silverans, R. E. Charge exchange collisions between alkaline-earth ions and alkali atoms. J. Phys. B25, 1009 (1992). URL https://doi. 19 org/10.1088/0953-4075/25/5/014

    1992 doi

  24. [35]

    & Heilig, K

    Fricke, G. & Heilig, K. Nuclear charge radii · 20-Ca Calcium. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ 10856314 22

  25. [36]

    Geithner, W. et al. Nuclear moments of neon isotopes in the range from 17Ne at the proton drip line to neutron-rich 25Ne. Phys. Rev. C 71, 064319 (2005). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.71.064319

    2005

  26. [37]

    & N¨ ortersh¨ auser, W

    M¨ uller, P., K¨ onig, K., Imgram, P., Kr¨ amer, J. & N¨ ortersh¨ auser, W. Collinear laser spectroscopy of Ca+: Solving the field- shift puzzle of the 4 s 2S1/2 → 4p 2P1/2,3/2 transitions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 043351 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.043351

    2020

  27. [38]

    Sommer, F. et al. Charge Radii of 55,56Ni Reveal a Surprisingly Similar Behavior atN = 28 in Ca and Ni Isotopes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 132501 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.129.132501

    2022

  28. [39]

    Two body contribution to the effective radius operator

    Zamick, L. Two body contribution to the effective radius operator. Ann. Phys.66, 784– 789 (1971). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0003-4916(71)90080-7

    1971

  29. [40]

    On the odd-even effect in the charge radii of isotopes

    Talmi, I. On the odd-even effect in the charge radii of isotopes. Nucl. Phys. A 423, 189– 196 (1984). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0375-9474(84)90587-6

    1984

  30. [41]

    Kortelainen, M. et al. Universal trend of charge radii of even-even Ca–Zn nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 105, L021303 (2022). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.L021303

    2022 doi

  31. [42]

    Bai, S. W. et al. Charge radii of neutron-rich scandium isotopes and the seniority symme- try in the 0 f7/2 shell. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 182501 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.134.182501

    2025

  32. [43]

    K., Morris, T

    Hergert, H., Bogner, S. K., Morris, T. D., Schwenk, A. & Tsukiyama, K. The In-Medium Similarity Renormalization Group: A Novel Ab Initio Method for Nuclei. Phys. Rep. 621, 165 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2015.12.007

    2016 doi

  33. [44]

    Stroberg, S. R. et al. Nucleus-dependent valence-space approach to nuclear struc- ture. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 032502 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 118.032502

    2017 doi

  34. [45]

    J., Erler, J., Reinhard, P.-G

    Pototzky, K. J., Erler, J., Reinhard, P.-G. & Nesterenko, V. O. Properties of odd nuclei and the impact of time-odd mean fields: A sys- tematic Skyrme-Hartree-Fock analysis. Eur. 20 Phys. J. A46, 299 (2010). URL https://doi. org/10.1140/epja/i2010-11045-6

    2010 doi

  35. [46]

    & Smirnov, D

    Tselyaev, V., Lyutorovich, N., Speth, J., Rein- hard, P.-G. & Smirnov, D. Low-energy M1 excitations in 208Pb and the spin channel of the Skyrme energy-density functional. Phys. Rev. C 99, 064329 (2019). URL https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.99.064329

    2019 doi

  36. [47]

    & Schwenk, A

    Companys Franzke, M., Tichai, A., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. Hartree-Fock emulators for nuclei: Application to charge radii of 48,52Ca (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv. 2510.08362. 2510.08362

    2025 doi

  37. [48]

    Garcia Ruiz, R. F. et al. Development of a sensitive setup for laser spectroscopy studies of very exotic calcium isotopes. J. Phys. G 44, 044003 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/1361-6471/aa5a24

    2017

  38. [49]

    K¨ onig, K. et al. High voltage determi- nation and stabilization for collinear laser spectroscopy applications. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 95, 083307 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10. 1063/5.0218649

    2024

  39. [50]

    Passon, S. et al. Ultra-stable 3D-printed precision voltage divider for calibrations and experiments. Meas.: Sens. 38, 101818 (2025). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measen.2025. 101818

    2025 doi

  40. [51]

    & Jaszu´ nski, M

    Antuˇ sek, A., Rodziewicz, P., K¸ edziera, D., Kaczmarek-K¸ edziera, A. & Jaszu´ nski, M. Ab initio study of nmr shielding of alkali earth metal ions in water complexes and magnetic moments of alkali earth metal nuclei. Chem. Phys. Lett. 588, 57–62 (2013). URL https: //doi.org...

    2013 doi

  41. [52]

    & Werth, G

    Arbes, F., Benzing, M., Gudjons, T., Kurth, F. & Werth, G. Precise determination of the ground state hyperfine structure splitting of 43Ca II. Zeitschr. Phys. D31, 27–30 (1994). URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01426573

    1994 doi

  42. [53]

    & Meißner, U.-G

    Epelbaum, E., Hammer, H.-W. & Meißner, U.-G. Modern theory of nuclear forces. Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1773–1825 (2009). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1773

    2009 doi

  43. [54]

    & Entem, D

    Machleidt, R. & Entem, D. Chiral effective field theory and nuclear forces. Phys. Rep. 503, 1–75 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physrep.2011.02.001

    2011

  44. [55]

    R., Bogner, S

    Stroberg, S. R., Bogner, S. K., Hergert, H. & Holt, J. D. Nonempirical Inter- actions for the Nuclear Shell Model: An Update. Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.69, 307– 362 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev-nucl-101917-021120. 21

    2019

  45. [56]

    & Schwenk, A

    Heinz, M., Tichai, A., Hoppe, J., Hebeler, K. & Schwenk, A. In-medium similarity renor- malization group with three-body operators. Phys. Rev. C103, 044318 (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.044318

    2021 doi

  46. [57]

    R., Navr´ atil, P., Hebeler, K

    Miyagi, T., Stroberg, S. R., Navr´ atil, P., Hebeler, K. & Holt, J. D. Converged ab ini- tio calculations of heavy nuclei. Phys. Rev. C 105, 014302 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevC.105.014302

    2022

  47. [58]

    R., Holt, J

    Miyagi, T., Stroberg, S. R., Holt, J. D. & Shimizu, N. Ab initio multishell valence-space Hamiltonians and the island of inversion.Phys. Rev. C 102, 034320 (2020). URL https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.034320

    2020 doi

  48. [59]

    L., Martorell, J

    Friar, J. L., Martorell, J. & Sprung, D. W. L. Nuclear sizes and the isotope shift. Phys. Rev. A 56, 4579–4586 (1997). URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4579

    1997 doi

  49. [60]

    Ong, A., Berengut, J. C. & Flambaum, V. V. Effect of spin-orbit nuclear charge density corrections due to the anomalous magnetic moment on halonuclei. Phys. Rev. C 82, 014320 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.82.014320

    2010

  50. [61]

    K., Furnstahl, R

    Hebeler, K., Bogner, S. K., Furnstahl, R. J., Nogga, A. & Schwenk, A. Improved nuclear matter calculations from chiral low- momentum interactions. Phys. Rev. C 83, 031301 (2011). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.83.031301

    2011

  51. [62]

    Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral inter- action

    Ekstr¨ om, A.et al. Accurate nuclear radii and binding energies from a chiral inter- action. Phys. Rev. C 91, 051301 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.91. 051301. [Erratum: Phys. Rev. C 109, 059901 (2024)]

    2015 doi

  52. [63]

    Jiang, W. G. et al.Accurate bulk properties of nuclei from A = 2 to ∞ from potentials with ∆ isobars. Phys. Rev. C102, 054301 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102. 054301

    2020 doi

  53. [64]

    Kl¨ upfel, P., Reinhard, P.-G., B¨ urvenich, T. J. & Maruhn, J. A. Variations on a theme by Skyrme: A systematic study of adjust- ments of model parameters. Phys. Rev. C79, 034310 (2009). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.79.034310

    2009

  54. [65]

    & Reinhard, P.-G

    Bender, M., Heenen, P.-H. & Reinhard, P.-G. Self-consistent mean-field models for nuclear structure. Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 121–180 (2003). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 75.121

    2003 doi

  55. [66]

    & Maruhn, J

    Reinhard, P.-G., Schuetrumpf, B. & Maruhn, J. The axial Hartree–Fock + BCS code 22 SkyAx. Comput. Phys. Commun.258, 107603 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc. 2020.107603

    2021

  56. [67]

    & Reinhard, P.-G

    Dobaczewski, J., Nazarewicz, W. & Reinhard, P.-G. Error estimates of theoretical mod- els: a guide. J. Phys. G 41, 074001 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/41/ 7/074001

    2014 doi

  57. [68]

    & Nazarewicz, W

    Reinhard, P.-G. & Nazarewicz, W. Nuclear charge densities in spherical and deformed nuclei: Toward precise calculations of charge radii. Phys. Rev. C 103, 054310 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103. 054310

    2021 doi

  58. [69]

    & Nazarewicz, W

    Reinhard, P.-G. & Nazarewicz, W. Erra- tum: Nuclear charge densities in spherical and deformed nuclei: Toward precise calcu- lations of charge radii. Phys. Rev. C 107, 069901 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevC.107.069901

    2023

  59. [70]

    & Schuck, P

    Ring, P. & Schuck, P. The nuclear many-body problem(Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1980). URL https://www.springer.com/gp/ book/9783540212065. Acknowledgements We thank Christian Gorges and Stephan Malbrunot-Ettenauer for their contributions in the earlier periods of the ROC develop...

    1980

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.