Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Mitigating the impact of noise transients in gravitational-wave searches using reduced basis timeseries and convolutional neural networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.15513 v1 pith:AZOW4UGF submitted 2024-10-20 astro-ph.IM

Mitigating the impact of noise transients in gravitational-wave searches using reduced basis timeseries and convolutional neural networks

classification astro-ph.IM
keywords detectionglitchespositivesignaldatafalsegravitational-wavenoise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Gravitational-wave detection pipelines have helped to identify over one hundred compact binary mergers in the data collected by the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo interferometers, whose sensitivity has provided unprecedented access to the workings of the gravitational universe. The detectors are, however, subject to a wide variety of noise transients (or glitches) that can contaminate the data. Although detection pipelines utilize a variety of noise mitigation techniques, glitches can occasionally bypass these checks and produce false positives. One class of mitigation techniques is the signal consistency check, which aims to quantify how similar the observed data is to the expected signal. In this work, we describe a new signal consistency check that utilizes a set of bases that spans the gravitational-wave signal space and convolutional neural networks (CNN) to probabilistically identify glitches. We recast the basis response as a grayscale image, and train a CNN to distinguish between gravitational-waves and glitches with similar morphologies. We find that the CNN accurately classifies $\gtrsim 99\%$ of the responses it is shown. We compare these results to a toy detection pipeline, finding that the two methods produce similar false positive rates, but that the CNN has a significantly higher true positive rate. We modify our toy model detection pipeline and demonstrate that including information from the network increases the toy pipeline's true positive rate by $4-7\%$ while decreasing the false positive rate to a data-limited bound of $\lesssim 0.1\%$.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. When (not) to trust Monte Carlo approximations for hierarchical Bayesian inference

    astro-ph.HE 2025-09 conditional novelty 7.0

    A unified error statistic E-hat measures information lost to Monte Carlo noise in hierarchical Bayesian inference, with a recommended cutoff of 0.2 bits.