REVIEW 3 cited by
Inclusive dijet cross sections in neutral current deep inelastic scattering at HERA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Single- and double-differential inclusive dijet cross sections in neutral current deep inelastic ep scattering have been measured with the ZEUS detector using an integrated luminosity of 374 pb^-1. The measurement was performed at large values of the photon virtuality, Q^2, between 125 and 20000 GeV^2. The jets were reconstructed with the k_T cluster algorithm in the Breit reference frame and selected by requiring their transverse energies in the Breit frame, E_T,B^jet, to be larger than 8 GeV. In addition, the invariant mass of the dijet system, M_jj, was required to be greater than 20 GeV. The cross sections are described by the predictions of next-to-leading-order QCD.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Parton distributions confront LHC Run II data: a quantitative appraisal
A systematic NNLO data-theory comparison shows that the main PDF sets generalise to unseen LHC and HERA data about equally well once PDF, alpha_s, and missing higher order uncertainties are included.
-
Precise Determination of the Strong Coupling Constant from Dijet Cross Sections up to the Multi-TeV Range
A complete NNLO QCD fit to LHC and HERA dijet data yields alpha_s(m_Z) = 0.1178 with a total uncertainty of 0.0022 and tests the running coupling from 7 GeV up to 7 TeV.
-
Revisiting constraints on proton PDFs from HERA DIS, Drell-Yan, W/Z Boson production, and projected EIC measurements
A new NLO and NNLO global QCD fit to HERA, Drell-Yan, and W/Z data yields proton PDFs, a strange-sea ratio near 1.07, and projections that EIC data would reduce gluon and alpha_s uncertainties.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.