REVIEW 1 cited by
Lipschitz Bandits with Batched Feedback
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
In this paper, we study Lipschitz bandit problems with batched feedback, where the expected reward is Lipschitz and the reward observations are communicated to the player in batches. We introduce a novel landscape-aware algorithm, called Batched Lipschitz Narrowing (BLiN), that optimally solves this problem. Specifically, we show that for a $T$-step problem with Lipschitz reward of zooming dimension $d_z$, our algorithm achieves theoretically optimal (up to logarithmic factors) regret rate $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(T^{\frac{d_z+1}{d_z+2}}\right)$ using only $ \mathcal{O} \left( \log\log T\right) $ batches. We also provide complexity analysis for this problem. Our theoretical lower bound implies that $\Omega(\log\log T)$ batches are necessary for any algorithm to achieve the optimal regret. Thus, BLiN achieves optimal regret rate (up to logarithmic factors) using minimal communication.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Information Routing across Batch Boundaries: Memory--Batch Tradeoffs in Lipschitz Bandits
For W at least C_d log(eT), minimax pseudo-regret in Lipschitz bandits is, up to logarithmic factors, the maximum of the sequential rate, a new memory-batch penalty T^((d+2)/(d+3)) (1+(B-1)W)^(-1/(d(d+3))), and a batc...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.