Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Multipartite Mixed-Species Entanglement over a Quantum Network

T0 review · 1 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Two trapped-ion network modules entangle up to four qubits that mix two ion species, producing Bell and GHZ states with fidelities between 91 and 97 percent.

desk verdict Solid experimental milestone: first remote mixed-species ion entanglement, 4-qubit GHZ states, and 10s storage, with claims well supported by tomography. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14334 v1 pith:BORXHFDE submitted 2025-06-17 quant-ph

D. Main , P. Drmota , E. M. Ainley , A. Agrawal , D. Webb , S. Saner , O. Bazavan , B. C. Nichol
show 4 more authors
R. Srinivas D. P. Nadlinger G. Araneda D. M. Lucas
This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumnetworkstrapped-ionqubitsmixed-speciesentanglementGHZstatesmemorymultipartitephotonicdistributionstorage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports an elementary quantum network of two separated trapped-ion modules, each holding one strontium and one calcium ion, and claims that remote entanglement can be created on the strontium qubits, converted onto the calcium qubits by local mixed-species logic, and expanded into multipartite states. Its central claim is the experimental realisation of Bell states across Sr$^+$–Sr$^+$, Sr$^+$–Ca$^+$ and Ca$^+$–Ca$^+$ ion pairs, together with three- and four-qubit mixed-species GHZ states, all with fidelities between 91% and 97%. It further claims that the remotely entangled state can be stored in the calcium memory qubits for about 10 seconds, over one hundred times the roughly 100 ms needed to create it. The reason this matters is that practical quantum networks need nodes that combine a photonic interface, local logic gates, and long-lived memory, and this is a working demonstration of all three roles in a single device.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the combination of a photonic herald and local mixed-species logic. Remote entanglement is produced by a two-photon try-until-success protocol: photons from the two strontium ions are interfered at a central station, and a particular detection pattern heralds a Bell state between the network qubits (the strontium optical qubit defined by $S_{1/2}(m_J = -1/2)$ and $D_{5/2}(m_J = -3/2)$). To move the entanglement onto calcium, each module applies an error-detected iSWAP gate built from two mixed-species CNOT gates; the CNOT is a Walsh-modulated light-shift spin-dependent force of $\sigma_z \otimes \sigma_z$ type acting on the axial out-of-phase motion of the two-ion crystal, and the error detection is a mid-circuit measurement of the strontium qubit that aborts the run if the gate failed, with the two modules synchronised through a real-time classical link. A composite-pulse hyperfine transfer then shuttles the state between the calcium auxiliary qubit and the long-lived circuit qubit (the $F=4, m_F=0$ and $F=3, m_F=0$ ground-hyperfine states of $^{43}$Ca$^{+}$), which provides the roughly 10 s of memory. All fidelities are established by full tomography through diluted maximum-likelihood reconstruction and by partial tomography using the parity/population estimator $F = (P + C)/2$, which requires only population and parity measurements.

What would settle it

Measure the round-trip latency of the classical link between the two modules' control systems and compare it with the time budget between the iSWAP gate and the abort decision; if the latency exceeds that budget, both modules cannot abort together when one detects an error, and the reported Sr$^{+}$–Ca$^{+}$ fidelity of 94.1(6)% and Ca$^{+}$–Ca$^{+}$ fidelity of 93.1(7)% would not be reproducible.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Stated as the authors would put it, the discovery is that entanglement generated between the optical network qubits ($^{88}$Sr$^{+}$) can be coherently transferred, node by node, to the calcium memory qubits ($^{43}$Ca$^{+}$), and then extended by local gates into three- and four-qubit GHZ states that mix both species across the two modules, all while remaining far above the classical fidelity bound. Full state tomography gives entanglement fidelities of 96.94(9)% for the remote Sr$^{+}$–Sr$^{+}$ Bell state, 94.1(6)% for Sr$^{+}$–Ca$^{+}$, 93.1(7)% for Ca$^{+}$–Ca$^{+}$, 93.1(7)% for the three-qubit GHZ state, and 91.9(8)% for the four-qubit GHZ state; partial tomography based on population and parity measurements agrees within error bars. Stored remote entanglement in the calcium circuit qubits decays with a time constant of 14(4) s and retains 69(4)% fidelity after 10 s, whereas the strontium network qubits decay in 44(3) ms, which is the quantitative sense in which the memory qubit extends the network's holding time.

Load-bearing premise

The error-detected iSWAP transfer assumes a fast and reliable real-time classical link between the two modules, because both must receive each other's mid-circuit measurement outcomes and abort together whenever either detects a gate error, and the paper does not specify that link's latency or error rate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single node can hold the photonic interface and the quantum memory in one ion crystal, so remote entanglement can be generated on the strontium species and handed to the calcium species inside each module without breaking the link.
  • Three- and four-qubit multipartite entanglement across two distant modules is within reach of current trapped-ion technology, supplying the distributed resource assumed by protocols such as quantum secret sharing and networked quantum error correction.
  • Remote entanglement can be buffered for about 10 seconds, with a measured decay constant of 14(4) seconds, which is more than 100 times the generation timescale and enters the regime where repeat-until-success and entanglement-distillation protocols become practical.
  • The gap between the 96.94(9)% Sr$^{+}$–Sr$^{+}$ fidelity and the 91% to 94% mixed-species fidelities is set by the local conversion gates, so improving those gates would directly raise the quality of the network states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mixed-species fidelities are conditional on the real-time classical link: if that link turned out to be slower than the abort window, the error-detection logic could not fire, so characterising the link latency and its effect on the sustainable entanglement rate is a natural next measurement that the paper does not report.
  • With heralding succeeding roughly once per $10^{4}$ attempts while the calcium memory holds entanglement for about 10 s, the hardware sits in the regime where many failed attempts could be accumulated in memory before distillation; the paper demonstrates the rates and the memory but not the accumulation protocol.
  • The same two-species nodes could serve atomic-clock-network experiments, because the entangled states connect ions with very different magnetic-field sensitivities, which is the ingredient for entangled frequency comparisons; the paper points to that use but does not perform it.
  • Because the GHZ construction adds one local CNOT per node, additional memory ions per module would extend the scheme to larger multipartite states at a fixed photonic-link cost, with the final fidelity set by the accumulated local gate errors.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports an experimental demonstration of multipartite mixed-species entanglement in a two-node trapped-ion quantum network. Using photonic entanglement between 88Sr+ network qubits and local mixed-species gates (CNOT and error-detected iSWAP) with 43Ca+ memory qubits, the authors generate bipartite Sr+-Sr+, Sr+-Ca+, and Ca+-Ca+ entangled states as well as 3- and 4-qubit GHZ states, with fidelities between 91% and 97% as estimated by both partial and full state tomography. They also show that remote entanglement can be stored for about 10 s in the Ca+ circuit qubits, exceeding the entanglement-generation time by two orders of magnitude.

Significance. The results represent a notable advance in quantum networking: they integrate remote photonic entanglement, local mixed-species logic, and long-lived memory in a single platform, and they provide the first demonstration (to my knowledge) of remote multipartite mixed-species entanglement. The cross-validation between partial and full state tomography, the careful characterization of gate and SPAM errors in the supplementary, and the direct measurement of storage fidelities above the separability bound are strengths. The fidelities are high enough to certify genuine multipartite entanglement for the GHZ states. The paper is likely to be of wide interest to the quantum networking and trapped-ion communities.

major comments (1)
  1. [Storage of remote entanglement, Fig. 3(c)] The reported decay time constant of 14(4) s for the circuit-qubit entanglement appears inconsistent with the measured fidelity of 69(4)% at 10 s under the stated exponential-decay model. If the fidelity follows F(t)=F0 exp(-t/tau), then with tau=14 s and F(10 s)=0.69 one obtains F0 approximately 1.4, which is unphysical. The authors should clarify whether the fit is applied to the fidelity or to the parity contrast with a constant population offset, and provide the fitted initial value or the full model. As written, the quoted time constant is not compatible with the displayed data point.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Quantum networking modules, Fig. 1] The physical distance between the two modules is not stated; the claim of entanglement 'over macroscopic distances' would be better supported by quoting the fibre length or module separation.
  2. [Storage of remote entanglement] The exponential decay fit is described only as 'the same exponential decay model as above'; please specify the functional form (e.g., whether a constant offset is included) and report the initial fidelity or the fitted curve parameters.
  3. [Supplementary S2.2.2] The real-time classical link between modules is essential to the error-detected iSWAP protocol, but its latency and reliability are not specified. Please state the typical link latency and how it compares with the decision time for abort/continue.
  4. [Table I] The column header is difficult to interpret; consider reformatting the table to clearly separate the fidelity, error probability, success probability, and rate columns.
  5. [Bipartite mixed-species entanglement] The sentence 'including this cooling, we observe a net entanglement generation rate of 39.31(9) s^-1' should clarify whether this rate accounts for the duty cycle of the cooling sequence.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central claims are supported by direct full and partial tomography, and all fitted quantities are reported as results rather than used as inputs to infer entanglement.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are experimental realizations of remote bipartite and multipartite mixed-species entangled states, supported by full state tomography with dense matrix reconstruction and cross-checked by partial tomography. The partial-tomography fidelity formula F=(P+C)/2 assumes the target state has the form of Eq. 1, but this is an analysis assumption, not a circular derivation, and it is independently corroborated by full tomography results (e.g., Sr+-Ca+: full 94.1(6)% vs partial 95.1(8)%; 4-qubit GHZ: full 91.9(8)% vs partial 91(1)%). The exponential decay time constants in the storage section are fits to measured fidelity decay curves and are reported as results; they are not used as inputs to infer the existence of remote entanglement. The supplementary predictions of iSWAP transfer fidelity are derived from reconstructed gate superoperators, but they are ancillary characterizations of local gates, not inputs to the central remote-entanglement claims. Self-citations appear for prior hardware and protocol details, such as Ref. [32] for the remote-entanglement protocol, Ref. [19] for the mixed-species gate mechanism, Ref. [35] for prior circuit-qubit memory work, and Ref. [4] for hyperfine transfer; these are procedural or contextual references to independently reported capabilities, not load-bearing circular justifications. The stated limitation in S3.1 that single-qubit rotation errors are neglected is a bounded caveat, with expected error below 1e-3 and supported by the randomized-benchmarking data in Table S1; it does not constitute a circular step. No derivation in the paper reduces by construction to its inputs, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction of the main results.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The experimental claim relies on a set of established physical assumptions: the two-photon heralding produces the intended Bell state, the mixed-species gates implement the intended unitaries, and the memory qubit is decoupled from the gate beams. These are grounded in prior work (Refs. [19,32]) and re-verified here where possible. No free parameters are used as inputs to the central claim; fitted quantities (e.g., storage decay constants) are reported outputs.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The two-photon heralding protocol generates a Bell state between the Sr+ network qubits.
    Inherited from Ref. [32]; confirmed by the measured Sr+-Sr+ fidelity of 96.94(9)%.
  • domain assumption The mixed-species light-shift gate implements the intended CNOT and iSWAP unitaries with the characterized fidelities.
    Based on the gate mechanism of Ref. [19]; verified here by quantum process tomography (97.6(2)% and 98.0(2)% CNOT fidelities).
  • domain assumption The Q_C circuit qubit is decoupled from the 402 nm gate beams and from the network qubit operations.
    Relies on 43Ca+ hyperfine level structure; if false, the memory qubit would be disturbed during mixed-species gates.
  • domain assumption Readout errors are known and corrected for in tomography, while single-qubit rotation errors (<1e-3) are neglected.
    Stated in Section S3.1; the neglected errors are small compared to reported fidelities.
  • domain assumption The classical communication link between modules allows real-time exchange of mid-circuit measurement outcomes.
    Required for the error-detected iSWAP protocol; latency not characterized in the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multipartite Mixed-Species Entanglement over a Quantum Network." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BORXHFDE

@misc{pith2026250614334,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multipartite Mixed-Species Entanglement over a Quantum Network},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BORXHFDE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14334}
}
abstract

We generate multipartite entangled states of two, three and four matter qubits, where the entanglement is distributed over macroscopic distances via a photonic network link. Trapped-ion ${}^{88}\text{Sr}^+$ qubits are entangled directly via the optical fibre link, and the entanglement is subsequently extended to ${}^{43}\text{Ca}^+$ memory qubits co-trapped in each network node, using local mixed-species logic gates. We create remotely entangled $\text{Sr}^+$-$\text{Ca}^+$ and $\text{Ca}^+$-$\text{Ca}^+$ states, as well as mixed-species Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) states of up to four qubits. We demonstrate storage of the remotely-entangled memory qubits for $\sim10~\text{s}$, more than $100\times$ the creation time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.14334 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of mixed-species trapped-ion quantum networking apparatus. (a) Two mod￾ules, Alice and Bob, each co-trap one 88Sr+ and one 43Ca+. High-numerical-aperture lenses collect single photons from the 88Sr+ ions and couple them into optical fibres. The photons are interfered at a central heralding station, where particular detection patterns herald the generation of entanglement between the Sr+ ions in each module.… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Partial state tomography of the mixed-species remotely entangled states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Demonstration of the long-lived storage of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ekert, A. K. Quantum cryptography based on bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 661 (1991)

    work page 1991

  2. [2]

    I., Ekert, A

    Cirac, J. I., Ekert, A. K., Huelga, S. F. & Macchiavello, C. Distributed quantum computation over noisy chan- nels. Phys. Rev. A59, 4249 (1999)

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    M., Sørensen, A

    Jiang, L., Taylor, J. M., Sørensen, A. S. & Lukin, M. D. Distributed quantum computation based on small quan- tum registers. Phys. Rev. A76, 062323 (2007)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Nature638, 383 (2025)

    Main, D.et al.Distributed quantum computing across an optical network link. Nature638, 383 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Nature Physics 16, 281 (2020)

    Guo, X.et al.Distributed quantum sensing in a continuous-variable entangled network. Nature Physics 16, 281 (2020)

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    K´ om´ ar, P.et al.A quantum network of clocks. Nat. Phys.10, 582 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Kimble, H. J. The quantum internet. Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    2008

  8. [8]

    & Rempe, G

    Reiserer, A. & Rempe, G. Cavity-based quantum net- works with single atoms and optical photons. Reviews of Modern Physics87, 1379 (2015)

    work page 2015

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    & Hanson, R

    Wehner, S., Elkouss, D. & Hanson, R. Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead. Science362(2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    Science372, 259 (2021)

    Pompili, M.et al.Realization of a multinode quantum network of remote solid-state qubits. Science372, 259 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    Nature Physics11, 37 (2015)

    Hucul, D.et al.Modular entanglement of atomic qubits using photons and phonons. Nature Physics11, 37 (2015)

    2015

  4. [12]

    & Chuang, I

    Gottesman, D. & Chuang, I. L. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using tele- portation and single-qubit operations. Nature402, 390 (1999)

    1999

  5. [13]

    & Berthiaume, A

    Hillery, M., Buˇ zek, V. & Berthiaume, A. Quantum secret sharing. Physical Review A59, 1829 (1999)

    1999

  6. [14]

    Nature Physics10, 582 (2014)

    Komar, P.et al.A quantum network of clocks. Nature Physics10, 582 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    O.et al.Spectroscopy using quantum logic

    Schmidt, P. O.et al.Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science309, 749 (2005)

    2005

  8. [16]

    R.et al.Multi-element logic gates for trapped- ion qubits

    Tan, T. R.et al.Multi-element logic gates for trapped- ion qubits. Nature528, 380 (2015)

    2015

  9. [17]

    V., Crocker, C., Lichtman, M., Sosnova, K

    Inlek, I. V., Crocker, C., Lichtman, M., Sosnova, K. & Monroe, C. Multispecies trapped-ion node for quantum networking. Physical review letters118, 250502 (2017)

    2017

  10. [18]

    & Chi- averini, J

    Bruzewicz, C., McConnell, R., Stuart, J., Sage, J. & Chi- averini, J. Dual-species, multi-qubit logic primitives for ca+/sr+ trapped-ion crystals. npj Quantum Information 5, 102 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    C.et al.Benchmarking a high-fidelity mixed-species entangling gate

    Hughes, A. C.et al.Benchmarking a high-fidelity mixed-species entangling gate. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 080504 (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Wang, P.et al.Single ion qubit with estimated coher- ence time exceeding one hour. Nat. Commun.12, 233 (2021)

    2021

  13. [21]

    J., Harty, T

    Ballance, C. J., Harty, T. P., Linke, N. M., Sepiol, M. A. & Lucas, D. M. High-fidelity quantum logic gates us- ing trapped-ion hyperfine qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 060504 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    P.et al.High-fidelity universal gate set for 9Be + ion qubits

    Gaebler, J. P.et al.High-fidelity universal gate set for 9Be + ion qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 060505 (2016)

    2016

  15. [23]

    Nature597, 209 (2021)

    Srinivas, R.et al.High-fidelity laser-free universal con- trol of trapped ion qubits. Nature597, 209 (2021)

    2021

  16. [24]

    R.et al.High-fidelity Bell-state preparation with 40Ca+ optical qubits

    Clark, C. R.et al.High-fidelity Bell-state preparation with 40Ca+ optical qubits. Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 130505 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    A.et al., Robust and fast microwave-driven quantum logic for trapped-ion qubits (2024)

    Weber, M. A.et al., Robust and fast microwave-driven quantum logic for trapped-ion qubits (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    M.et al., Scalable, high-fidelity all- electronic control of trapped-ion qubits (2024)

    L¨ oschnauer, C. M.et al., Scalable, high-fidelity all- electronic control of trapped-ion qubits (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    C., Leu, A

    Smith, M. C., Leu, A. D., Miyanishi, K., Gely, M. F. & Lucas, D. M. Single-qubit gates with errors at the 10 −7 level. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 230601 (2025)

    2025

  20. [28]

    P.et al.High-fidelity preparation, gates, mem- ory, and readout of a trapped-ion quantum bit

    Harty, T. P.et al.High-fidelity preparation, gates, mem- ory, and readout of a trapped-ion quantum bit. Phys. 7 Rev. Lett.113, 220501 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    A.et al.High fidelity state preparation and measurement of ion hyperfine qubits withI > 1 2

    An, F. A.et al.High fidelity state preparation and measurement of ion hyperfine qubits withI > 1 2 . Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 130501 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    S.et al., High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement (2024)

    Sotirova, A. S.et al., High-fidelity heralded quantum state preparation and measurement (2024)

    2024

  23. [31]

    L.et al.Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance

    Moehring, D. L.et al.Entanglement of single-atom quantum bits at a distance. Nature449, 68 (2007)

    2007

  24. [32]

    J.et al.High-rate, high-fidelity entangle- ment of qubits across an elementary quantum network

    Stephenson, L. J.et al.High-rate, high-fidelity entangle- ment of qubits across an elementary quantum network. Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 110501 (2020)

    2020

  25. [33]

    Physical Review Letters 130, 050803 (2023)

    Krutyanskiy, V.et al.Entanglement of trapped-ion qubits separated by 230 meters. Physical Review Letters 130, 050803 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Saha, S.et al., High-fidelity remote entanglement of trapped atoms mediated by time-bin photons (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Drmota, P.et al.Robust quantum memory in a trapped- ion quantum network node. Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 090803 (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    There is also a 5 % branching ratio for decays to the D3/2 manifold, however these result in an unsuccessful entan- glement attempt and so can be neglected

  29. [37]

    A.et al.Experimental entanglement of four particles

    Sackett, C. A.et al.Experimental entanglement of four particles. Nature404, 256 (2000)

    2000

  30. [38]

    T., Schraft, D., Vitanov, N

    Genov, G. T., Schraft, D., Vitanov, N. V. & Halfmann, T. Arbitrarily accurate pulse sequences for robust dy- namical decoupling. Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 133202 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    A., Gill, P

    Letchumanan, V., Wilson, M. A., Gill, P. & Sinclair, A. G. Lifetime measurement of the metastable 4d 2D5/2 state in 88Sr+ using a single trapped ion. Phys. Rev. A 72, 012509 (2005)

    2005

  32. [40]

    J., De Beaudrap, N

    Nigmatullin, R., Ballance, C. J., De Beaudrap, N. & Ben- jamin, S. C. Minimally complex ion traps as modules for quantum communication and computing. New Journal of Physics18, 103028 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Allcock, D. T. C.et al.omg blueprint for trapped ion quantum computing with metastable states. Applied Physics Letters119, 214002 (2021)

    2021

  34. [42]

    Nature Communications15, 204 (2024)

    Feng, L.et al.Realization of a crosstalk-avoided quan- tum network node using dual-type qubits of the same ion species. Nature Communications15, 204 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    Lai, P.-C.et al.Realization of a crosstalk-free two-ion node for long-distance quantum networking. Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 070801 (2025)

    2025

  36. [44]

    & Ozeri, R

    Akerman, N. & Ozeri, R. Atomic combination clocks. New Journal of Physics20, 123026 (2018)

    2018

  37. [45]

    A., Gagatsos, C

    Van Milligen, E. A., Gagatsos, C. N., Kaur, E., Towsley, D. & Guha, S. Utilizing probabilistic entanglement between sensors in quantum networks. Physical Review Applied22, 064085 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16220

    Finkelstein, R.et al.Universal quantum operations and ancilla-based readout for tweezer clocks (2024). arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.16220

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    H.et al.Demonstration of shor encoding on a trapped-ion quantum computer

    Nguyen, N. H.et al.Demonstration of shor encoding on a trapped-ion quantum computer. Physical Review Applied16, 024057 (2021)

    2021

  40. [48]

    Bourdeauducq, S.et al., m-labs/artiq: 6.0 (Version 6.0) (2021)

    2021

  41. [49]

    Maunz, P. L. W. High optical access trap 2.0. 10.2172/1237003 (2016)

    2016 doi

  42. [50]

    C., Phoenix and Peregrine ion traps (2020)

    Revelle, M. C., Phoenix and Peregrine ion traps (2020)

    2020

  43. [51]

    & Biercuk, M

    Hayes, D., Khodjasteh, K., Viola, L. & Biercuk, M. J. Reducing sequencing complexity in dynamical quantum error suppression by Walsh modulation. Phys. Rev. A 84, 062323 (2011)

    2011

  44. [52]

    Hayes, D.et al.Coherent error suppression in multiqubit entangling gates. Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 020503 (2012)

    2012

  45. [53]

    J., Biamonte, J

    Wood, C. J., Biamonte, J. D. & Cory, D. G., Tensor net- works and graphical calculus for open quantum systems (2015)

    2015

  46. [54]

    breathing

    ˇReh´ aˇ cek, J., Hradil, Z., Knill, E. & Lvovsky, A. I. Di- luted maximum-likelihood algorithm for quantum tomog- raphy. Phys. Rev. A75, 042108 (2007). 8 SUPPLEMENT AR Y INFORMA TION S1. MODULES Our quantum networking apparatus comprises two trapped-ion modules, Alice and Bob...

    2007

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.