Pith. sign in

REVIEW 192 references

Phenomenological Aspects of Models with Low Scale Seesaw

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2412.07695 v1 pith:BRYPY2HH submitted 2024-12-10 hep-ph

Juan Marchant González This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph
keywords beenphenomenologicalseesawtheoriesaspectsconsistentexperimentalfermion
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Various phenomenological consequences of seesaw theories for the generation of the fermion mass hierarchy of the Standard Model have been analyzed, with an emphasis on models in which the light-active neutrino masses are derived from low-scale seesaw mechanisms. In particular, fermion masses and lepton flavor-violating decay processes, the flavor-changing neutral current, have been studied, and the implications of these theories for the observed dark matter relic density in the Universe have been determined. From the analysis of these phenomenological aspects, it was possible to determine the allowed parameter spaces of these theories and to obtain a parameter fit consistent with the currently measured experimental values. In this way, correlations between the different observables of the fermionic sector could be obtained, where all values were within the experimental ranges at $3\sigma$. Predictions for new physics consistent with cosmological limits were also obtained.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Results from one thousand days of real time directional solar neutrino data,

    Kamiokande-II Collaboration, K. S. Hirata et al., “Results from one thousand days of real time directional solar neutrino data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1297–1300

    1990

  2. [2]

    Search for neutrinos from the sun,

    R. Davis, Jr., D. S. Harmer, and K. C. Hoffman, “Search for neutrinos from the sun,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (1968) 1205–1209

    1968

  3. [3]

    Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos,

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, Y . Fukudaet al., “Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1562–1567, arXiv:hep-ex/9807003

    arXiv 1998

  4. [4]

    Observation of a small atmospheric muon-neutrino / electron-neutrino ratio in Kamiokande,

    Kamiokande-II Collaboration, K. S. Hirata et al., “Observation of a small atmospheric muon-neutrino / electron-neutrino ratio in Kamiokande,” Phys. Lett. B 280 (1992) 146–152

    1992

  5. [5]

    Solar B-8 and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data,

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., “Solar B-8 and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5651–5655, arXiv:hep-ex/0103032

    arXiv 2001

  6. [6]

    First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,

    KamLAND Collaboration, K. Eguchi et al., “First results from KamLAND: Evidence for reactor anti-neutrino disappearance,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 021802, arXiv:hep-ex/0212021

    arXiv 2003

  7. [7]

    Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND,

    KamLAND Collaboration, S. Abe et al., “Precision Measurement of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters with KamLAND,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 221803, arXiv:0801.4589 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Precise Measurement of the Neutrino Mixing Parameter θ23 from Muon Neutrino Disappearance in an Off-Axis Beam,

    T2K Collaboration, K. Abe et al., “Precise Measurement of the Neutrino Mixing Parameter θ23 from Muon Neutrino Disappearance in an Off-Axis Beam,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 no. 18, (2014) 181801, arXiv:1403.1532 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2014

Show all 192 references
  1. [9]

    Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,

    RENO Collaboration, J. K. Ahn et al., “Observation of Reactor Electron Antineutrino Disappearance in the RENO Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 191802, arXiv:1204.0626 [hep-ex]

    2012 arXiv

  2. [10]

    2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,

    P. F. de Salas, D. V . Forero, S. Gariazzo, P. Mart´ınez-Mirav´e, O. Mena, C. A. Ternes, M. T´ortola, and J. W. F. Valle, “2020 global reassessment of the neutrino oscillation picture,”JHEP 02 (2021) 071, arXiv:2006.11237 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Teor ´ıa cu´antica de campos,

    J. I. Illana, “Teor ´ıa cu´antica de campos,” 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Maggiore, A modern introduction to quantum field theory, vol

    M. Maggiore, A modern introduction to quantum field theory, vol. 12. Oxford university press, 2005

    2005

  5. [13]

    M. E. Peskin, An introduction to quantum field theory. CRC Press, 2018

    2018

  6. [14]

    The Standard model of electroweak interactions,

    A. Pich, “The Standard model of electroweak interactions,” in The Standard model of electroweak interactions, pp. 1–49. 2008. arXiv:0705.4264 [hep-ph] . http://doc.cern.ch/yellowrep/2007/2007-005/cern-2007-005.pdf . [,1(2007)]

    2007 arXiv

  7. [15]

    M. D. Schwartz, Quantum field theory and the standard model. Cambridge University Press, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Georgi, Lie algebras in particle physics: from isospin to unified theories

    H. Georgi, Lie algebras in particle physics: from isospin to unified theories. CRC Press, 2018

    2018

  9. [17]

    Field theories with ≪superconductor≫ solutions,

    J. Goldstone, “Field theories with ≪superconductor≫ solutions,” Il Nuovo Cimento (1955-1965) 19 no. 1, (1961) 154–164. 90 Bibliography 91

    1961

  10. [18]

    Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,

    F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons,” Physical Review Letters 13 no. 9, (1964) 321

    1964

  11. [19]

    Langacker, The standard model and beyond

    P. Langacker, The standard model and beyond. CRC press, 2017

    2017

  12. [20]

    El modelo est ´andar y su fenomenolog´ıa,

    J. I. Illana, “El modelo est ´andar y su fenomenolog´ıa,” 2007

    2007

  13. [21]

    Flavour Dynamics and Violations of the CP Symmetry,

    A. Pich, “Flavour Dynamics and Violations of the CP Symmetry,” CERN YellowRep. School Proc. 4 (2018) 65, arXiv:1805.08597 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Introduction to flavour physics,

    J. Zupan, “Introduction to flavour physics,” in 2018 European School of High-Energy Physics (ESHEP2018) Maratea, Italy, June 20-July 3, 2018. 2019. arXiv:1903.05062 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [23]

    The hierarchy problem of the electroweak standard model revisited,

    F. Jegerlehner, “The hierarchy problem of the electroweak standard model revisited,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1305.6652 (2013)

    2013 arXiv

  16. [24]

    New solutions to the hierarchy problem,

    G. Burdman, “New solutions to the hierarchy problem,” Brazilian journal of physics 37 (2007) 506–513

    2007

  17. [25]

    Quark Mass Hierarchy and Flavor Mixing Puzzles,

    Z.-z. Xing, “Quark Mass Hierarchy and Flavor Mixing Puzzles,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014) 1430067, arXiv:1411.2713 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle,

    F. Feruglio, “Pieces of the Flavour Puzzle,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75 no. 8, (2015) 373, arXiv:1503.04071 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,

    H. Fritzsch and Z.-z. Xing, “Mass and flavor mixing schemes of quarks and leptons,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 45 (2000) 1–81, arXiv:hep-ph/9912358

    2000 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Mesonium and antimesonium,

    B. Pontecorvo, “Mesonium and antimesonium,” Zhur. Eksptl’. i Teoret. Fiz. 33 (8, 1957) . https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4343073

    1957

  21. [29]

    Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,

    SNO Collaboration, Q. R. Ahmad et al., “Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral current interactions in the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 011301, arXiv:nucl-ex/0204008

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Neutrino Mass and Mixing: from Theory to Experiment,

    S. F. King, A. Merle, S. Morisi, Y . Shimizu, and M. Tanimoto, “Neutrino Mass and Mixing: from Theory to Experiment,” New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 045018, arXiv:1402.4271 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,

    V . C. Rubin and W. K. Ford, Jr., “Rotation of the Andromeda Nebula from a Spectroscopic Survey of Emission Regions,” Astrophys. J. 159 (1970) 379–403

    1970

  24. [32]

    Letter to l. meitner and her colleagues,

    W. Pauli, “Letter to l. meitner and her colleagues,” Phys. Today 9 (1930) 23

    1930

  25. [33]

    Detection of the free neutrino,

    F. Reines and C. L. Cowan, “Detection of the free neutrino,” Phys. Rev. 92 (1953) 830–831

    1953

  26. [34]

    Mesonium and anti-mesonium,

    B. Pontecorvo, “Mesonium and anti-mesonium,” Sov. Phys. JETP 6 (1957) 429

    1957

  27. [35]

    Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge,

    B. Pontecorvo, “Inverse beta processes and nonconservation of lepton charge,” Zh. Eksp. Teor.Fiz. 34 (1957) 247

    1957

  28. [36]

    Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,

    Z. Maki, M. Nakagawa, and S. Sakata, “Remarks on the unified model of elementary particles,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 28 (1962) 870–880

    1962

  29. [37]

    Giunti and C

    C. Giunti and C. W. Kim, Fundamentals of neutrino physics and astrophysics. Oxford university press, 2007

    2007

  30. [38]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,” Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO] . [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    2020 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Search for Majorana Neutrinos with the Complete KamLAND-Zen Dataset,

    KamLAND-Zen Collaboration, S. Abe et al., “Search for Majorana Neutrinos with the Complete KamLAND-Zen Dataset,” arXiv:2406.11438 [hep-ex] . 92 CHAPTER 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

  32. [40]

    Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,

    S. Weinberg, “Baryon and Lepton Nonconserving Processes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1566–1570

    1979

  33. [41]

    Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,

    R. N. Mohapatra and G. Senjanovic, “Neutrino Mass and Spontaneous Parity Nonconservation,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 (1980) 912

    1980

  34. [42]

    Mechanism for Understanding Small Neutrino Mass in Superstring Theories,

    R. N. Mohapatra, “Mechanism for Understanding Small Neutrino Mass in Superstring Theories,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 561–563

    1986

  35. [43]

    Neutrino masses in a 331 model with right-handed neutrinos without doubly charged Higgs bosons via inverse and double seesaw mechanisms,

    M. E. Catano, R. Martinez, and F. Ochoa, “Neutrino masses in a 331 model with right-handed neutrinos without doubly charged Higgs bosons via inverse and double seesaw mechanisms,”Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 073015, arXiv:1206.1966 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Stability and symmetry breaking in the general two-Higgs-doublet model,

    M. Maniatis, A. von Manteuffel, O. Nachtmann, and F. Nagel, “Stability and symmetry breaking in the general two-Higgs-doublet model,” Eur. Phys. J. C 48 (2006) 805–823, arXiv:hep-ph/0605184

    2006 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Scalar sector of two-Higgs-doublet models: A minireview,

    G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, “Scalar sector of two-Higgs-doublet models: A minireview,” Pramana 87 no. 3, (2016) 40, arXiv:1507.06424 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,

    E. Ma, “Verifiable radiative seesaw mechanism of neutrino mass and dark matter,” Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 077301, arXiv:hep-ph/0601225

    2006 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Dark Radiative Inverse Seesaw Mechanism,

    A. Ahriche, S. M. Boucenna, and S. Nasri, “Dark Radiative Inverse Seesaw Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 7, (2016) 075036, arXiv:1601.04336 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Fermion masses and mixings and dark matter constraints in a model with radiative seesaw mechanism,

    N. Bernal, A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, I. de Medeiros Varzielas, and S. Kovalenko, “Fermion masses and mixings and dark matter constraints in a model with radiative seesaw mechanism,”JHEP 05 (2018) 053, arXiv:1712.02792 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Gauged inverse seesaw from dark matter,

    A. Abada, N. Bernal, A. E. C. Hern ´andez, X. Marcano, and G. Piazza, “Gauged inverse seesaw from dark matter,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 8, (2021) 758, arXiv:2107.02803 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Cosmological and astrophysical signatures of dark matter annihilations into pseudo-Goldstone bosons,

    C. Garcia-Cely, A. Ibarra, and E. Molinaro, “Cosmological and astrophysical signatures of dark matter annihilations into pseudo-Goldstone bosons,” JCAP 02 (2014) 032, arXiv:1312.3578 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Dark matter production from Goldstone boson interactions and implications for direct searches and dark radiation,

    C. Garcia-Cely, A. Ibarra, and E. Molinaro, “Dark matter production from Goldstone boson interactions and implications for direct searches and dark radiation,” JCAP 11 (2013) 061, arXiv:1310.6256 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  44. [52]

    micrOMEGAs : a code for the calculation of Dark Matter properties in generic models of particle interaction,

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, and A. Pukhov, “micrOMEGAs : a code for the calculation of Dark Matter properties in generic models of particle interaction,” in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: The Dark Secrets of the Terascale, pp. 739–790. 2013....

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A second Higgs from the Higgs portal,

    A. Falkowski, C. Gross, and O. Lebedev, “A second Higgs from the Higgs portal,” JHEP 05 (2015) 057, arXiv:1502.01361 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 no. 11, (2018) 111302, arXiv:1805.12562 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,

    LZ Collaboration, J. Aalbers et al., “First Dark Matter Search Results from the LUX-ZEPLIN (LZ) Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041002, arXiv:2207.03764 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “Projected WIMP sensitivity of the XENONnT dark matter experiment,” JCAP 11 (2020) 031, arXiv:2007.08796 [physics.ins-det]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1,

    T. Robens and T. Stefaniak, “Status of the Higgs Singlet Extension of the Standard Model after LHC Run 1,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75 (2015) 104, arXiv:1501.02234 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables,

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration, S. Dittmaier et al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables,” arXiv:1101.0593 [hep-ph] . Bibliography 93

    arXiv

  51. [59]

    A Precision Search for WIMPs with Charged Cosmic Rays,

    A. Reinert and M. W. Winkler, “A Precision Search for WIMPs with Charged Cosmic Rays,” JCAP 01 (2018) 055, arXiv:1712.00002 [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre,

    CTA Collaboration, A. Acharyya et al., “Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre,” JCAP 01 (2021) 057, arXiv:2007.16129 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Lepton Number Violation and Massless Nonorthogonal Neutrinos,

    P. Langacker and D. London, “Lepton Number Violation and Massless Nonorthogonal Neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 38 (1988) 907

    1988

  54. [62]

    General formulae for f (1) → f (2) + γ,

    L. Lavoura, “General formulae for f (1) → f (2) + γ,” Eur. Phys. J. C 29 (2003) 191–195, arXiv:hep-ph/0302221

    2003 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Exact one-loop results for li → ljγ in 3-3-1 models,

    L. T. Hue, L. D. Ninh, T. T. Thuc, and N. T. T. Dat, “Exact one-loop results for li → ljγ in 3-3-1 models,” Eur. Phys. J. C 78 no. 2, (2018) 128, arXiv:1708.09723 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Search for the lepton flavour violating decay µ+ → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment,

    MEG Collaboration, A. M. Baldini et al., “Search for the lepton flavour violating decay µ+ → e+γ with the full dataset of the MEG experiment,” Eur. Phys. J. C 76 no. 8, (2016) 434, arXiv:1605.05081 [hep-ex]

    2016 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering,

    F. Capozzi, E. Di Valentino, E. Lisi, A. Marrone, A. Melchiorri, and A. Palazzo, “Global constraints on absolute neutrino masses and their ordering,” Phys. Rev. D 95 no. 9, (2017) 096014, arXiv:2003.08511 [hep-ph] . [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 101, 116013 (2020)]

    2017 arXiv

  58. [66]

    The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,

    I. Esteban, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, and A. Zhou, “The fate of hints: updated global analysis of three-flavor neutrino oscillations,” JHEP 09 (2020) 178, arXiv:2007.14792 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Oscillating neutrinos and µ → e, γ,

    J. A. Casas and A. Ibarra, “Oscillating neutrinos and µ → e, γ,” Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 171–204, arXiv:hep-ph/0103065

    2001 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Neutrino phenomenology: The Case of two right-handed neutrinos,

    A. Ibarra and G. G. Ross, “Neutrino phenomenology: The Case of two right-handed neutrinos,” Phys. Lett. B 591 (2004) 285–296, arXiv:hep-ph/0312138

    2004 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Phenomenological consistency of the singlet-triplet scotogenic model,

    D. Restrepo and A. Rivera, “Phenomenological consistency of the singlet-triplet scotogenic model,” JHEP 04 (2020) 134, arXiv:1907.11938 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  62. [70]

    General parametrization of Majorana neutrino mass models,

    I. Cordero-Carri ´on, M. Hirsch, and A. Vicente, “General parametrization of Majorana neutrino mass models,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 7, (2020) 075032, arXiv:1912.08858 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Dirac-Phase Thermal Leptogenesis in the extended Type-I Seesaw Model,

    M. J. Dolan, T. P. Dutka, and R. R. V olkas, “Dirac-Phase Thermal Leptogenesis in the extended Type-I Seesaw Model,” JCAP 06 (2018) 012, arXiv:1802.08373 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Universal inverse seesaw mechanism as a source of the SM fermion mass hierarchy,

    A. E. C. Hern ´andez, D. T. Huong, and I. Schmidt, “Universal inverse seesaw mechanism as a source of the SM fermion mass hierarchy,” Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 1, (2022) 63, arXiv:2109.12118 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Determining Horizontal Symmetry from Neutrino Mixing,

    C. S. Lam, “Determining Horizontal Symmetry from Neutrino Mixing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 121602, arXiv:0804.2622 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Revisiting Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing in a Model with S(4) Discrete Symmetry,

    G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, and L. Merlo, “Revisiting Bimaximal Neutrino Mixing in a Model with S(4) Discrete Symmetry,” JHEP 05 (2009) 020, arXiv:0903.1940 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Phenomenological Consequences of See-Saw in S(4) Based Models,

    F. Bazzocchi, L. Merlo, and S. Morisi, “Phenomenological Consequences of See-Saw in S(4) Based Models,” Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 053003, arXiv:0902.2849 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Fermion Masses and Mixings in a S(4)-based Model,

    F. Bazzocchi, L. Merlo, and S. Morisi, “Fermion Masses and Mixings in a S(4)-based Model,” Nucl. Phys. B 816 (2009) 204–226, arXiv:0901.2086 [hep-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  69. [77]

    The Interplay Between GUT and Flavour Symmetries in a Pati-Salam x S4 Model,

    R. de Adelhart Toorop, F. Bazzocchi, and L. Merlo, “The Interplay Between GUT and Flavour Symmetries in a Pati-Salam x S4 Model,” JHEP 08 (2010) 001, arXiv:1003.4502 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  70. [78]

    An SO(10)XS4 Model of Quark-Lepton Complementarity,

    K. M. Patel, “An SO(10)XS4 Model of Quark-Lepton Complementarity,” Phys. Lett. B 695 (2011) 225–230, arXiv:1008.5061 [hep-ph] . 94 CHAPTER 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2011 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Model for T2K indication with maximal atmospheric angle and tri-maximal solar angle,

    S. Morisi, K. M. Patel, and E. Peinado, “Model for T2K indication with maximal atmospheric angle and tri-maximal solar angle,” Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 053002, arXiv:1107.0696 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Discrete Flavour Groups, theta13 and Lepton Flavour Violation,

    G. Altarelli, F. Feruglio, L. Merlo, and E. Stamou, “Discrete Flavour Groups, theta13 and Lepton Flavour Violation,”JHEP 08 (2012) 021, arXiv:1205.4670 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  73. [81]

    S4 Flavored CP Symmetry for Neutrinos,

    R. N. Mohapatra and C. C. Nishi, “ S4 Flavored CP Symmetry for Neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 073007, arXiv:1208.2875 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  74. [82]

    θ13 and Proton Decay in a Minimal SO(10) × S4 model of Flavor,

    P. S. Bhupal Dev, B. Dutta, R. N. Mohapatra, and M. Severson, “θ13 and Proton Decay in a Minimal SO(10) × S4 model of Flavor,” Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 035002, arXiv:1202.4012 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Flavour models for T M1 lepton mixing,

    I. de Medeiros Varzielas and L. Lavoura, “Flavour models for T M1 lepton mixing,” J. Phys. G 40 (2013) 085002, arXiv:1212.3247 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Spontaneous CP violation from vacuum alignment in S4 models of leptons,

    G.-J. Ding, S. F. King, C. Luhn, and A. J. Stuart, “Spontaneous CP violation from vacuum alignment in S4 models of leptons,” JHEP 05 (2013) 084, arXiv:1303.6180 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Neutrino masses and mixing fromS4 flavor twisting,

    H. Ishimori, Y . Shimizu, M. Tanimoto, and A. Watanabe, “Neutrino masses and mixing fromS4 flavor twisting,” Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 033004, arXiv:1010.3805 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Dirac Neutrinos with S4 Flavor Symmetry in Warped Extra Dimensions,

    G.-J. Ding and Y .-L. Zhou, “Dirac Neutrinos with S4 Flavor Symmetry in Warped Extra Dimensions,” Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 418–452, arXiv:1304.2645 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Leptons in Holographic Composite Higgs Models with Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries,

    C. Hagedorn and M. Serone, “Leptons in Holographic Composite Higgs Models with Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries,” JHEP 10 (2011) 083, arXiv:1106.4021 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Higgs → µτ as an indication for S4 flavor symmetry,

    M. D. Campos, A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, H. P¨as, and E. Schumacher, “Higgs → µτ as an indication for S4 flavor symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 91 no. 11, (2015) 116011, arXiv:1408.1652 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  81. [89]

    The 3-3-1 model withS4 flavor symmetry,

    P. V . Dong, H. N. Long, D. V . Soa, and V . V . Vien, “The 3-3-1 model withS4 flavor symmetry,” Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1544, arXiv:1009.2328 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Neutrino Mixing with Non-Zeroθ13 and CP Violation in the 3-3-1 Model Based on S4 Flavor Symmetry,

    V . V . Vien, H. N. Long, and D. P. Khoi, “Neutrino Mixing with Non-Zeroθ13 and CP Violation in the 3-3-1 Model Based on S4 Flavor Symmetry,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 30 no. 17, (2015) 1550102, arXiv:1506.06063 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  83. [91]

    SO(10) × S4 grand unified theory of flavour and leptogenesis,

    F. J. de Anda, S. F. King, and E. Perdomo, “SO(10) × S4 grand unified theory of flavour and leptogenesis,” JHEP 12 (2017) 075, arXiv:1710.03229 [hep-ph] . [Erratum: JHEP 04, 069 (2019)]

    2017 arXiv

  84. [92]

    An S4 × SU (5) SUSY GUT of flavour in 6d,

    F. J. de Anda and S. F. King, “An S4 × SU (5) SUSY GUT of flavour in 6d,” JHEP 07 (2018) 057, arXiv:1803.04978 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Littlest Inverse Seesaw Model,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez and S. F. King, “Littlest Inverse Seesaw Model,”Nucl. Phys. B 953 (2020) 114950, arXiv:1903.02565 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  86. [94]

    A New Littlest Seesaw Model,

    P.-T. Chen, G.-J. Ding, S. F. King, and C.-C. Li, “A New Littlest Seesaw Model,”J. Phys. G 47 no. 6, (2020) 065001, arXiv:1906.11414 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Multiple modular symmetries as the origin of flavor,

    I. de Medeiros Varzielas, S. F. King, and Y .-L. Zhou, “Multiple modular symmetries as the origin of flavor,” Phys. Rev. D 101 no. 5, (2020) 055033, arXiv:1906.02208 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Effective alignments and the landscape ofS4 flavour models,

    I. De Medeiros Varzielas, M. Levy, and Y .-L. Zhou, “Effective alignments and the landscape ofS4 flavour models,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 3, (2019) 035027, arXiv:1903.10506 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Fermion masses and mixings and some phenomenological aspects of a 3-3-1 model with linear seesaw mechanism,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, N. A. P´erez-Julve, and Y . Hidalgo Vel´asquez, “Fermion masses and mixings and some phenomenological aspects of a 3-3-1 model with linear seesaw mechanism,” Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 9, (2019) 095025, arXiv:1907.13083 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Soft breaking of the µ ↔ τ symmetry by S4 ⊗ Z2,

    J. D. Garc ´ıa-Aguilar, A. E. P. Ram´ırez, M. M. S. Casta˜neda, and J. C. G´omez-Izquierdo, “Soft breaking of the µ ↔ τ symmetry by S4 ⊗ Z2,” arXiv:2209.01316 [hep-ph] . Bibliography 95

    arXiv

  91. [99]

    Symmetry breaking patterns in 3HDM,

    I. P. Ivanov and C. C. Nishi, “Symmetry breaking patterns in 3HDM,” JHEP 01 (2015) 021, arXiv:1410.6139 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  92. [100]

    First Search for the Majorana Nature of Neutrinos in the Inverted Mass Ordering Region with KamLAND-Zen,

    KamLAND-Zen Collaboration, S. Abe et al., “First Search for the Majorana Nature of Neutrinos in the Inverted Mass Ordering Region with KamLAND-Zen,” arXiv:2203.02139 [hep-ex]

  93. [101]

    The Flavor symmetry,

    J. Kubo, A. Mondragon, M. Mondragon, and E. Rodriguez-Jauregui, “The Flavor symmetry,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 109 (2003) 795–807, arXiv:hep-ph/0302196. [Erratum: Prog.Theor.Phys. 114, 287–287 (2005)]

    2003 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Conditions for vacuum stability in an S(3) extension of the standard model,

    O. F. Beltran, M. Mondragon, and E. Rodriguez-Jauregui, “Conditions for vacuum stability in an S(3) extension of the standard model,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 171 (2009) 012028

    2009

  95. [103]

    Review of Particle Physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, R. L. Workman and Others, “Review of Particle Physics,”PTEP 2022 (2022) 083C01

    2022

  96. [104]

    Resummed Effective Lagrangian for Higgs Mediated FCNC Interactions in the CP Violating MSSM,

    A. Dedes and A. Pilaftsis, “Resummed Effective Lagrangian for Higgs Mediated FCNC Interactions in the CP Violating MSSM,”Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 015012, arXiv:hep-ph/0209306

    2003 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Three generations of Higgses and the cyclic groups,

    A. Aranda, C. Bonilla, and J. L. Diaz-Cruz, “Three generations of Higgses and the cyclic groups,” Phys. Lett. B 717 (2012) 248–251, arXiv:1204.5558 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  98. [106]

    On the ultimate precision of meson mixing observables,

    T. Jubb, M. Kirk, A. Lenz, and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, “On the ultimate precision of meson mixing observables,” Nucl. Phys. B 915 (2017) 431–453, arXiv:1603.07770 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  99. [107]

    CP violation in the B0 s system,

    M. Artuso, G. Borissov, and A. Lenz, “CP violation in the B0 s system,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 88 no. 4, (2016) 045002, arXiv:1511.09466 [hep-ph] . [Addendum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 91, 049901 (2019)]

    2016 arXiv

  100. [108]

    Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018,

    HFLA VCollaboration, Y . S. Amhiset al., “Averages of b-hadron, c-hadron, and τ-lepton properties as of 2018,” Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 3, (2021) 226, arXiv:1909.12524 [hep-ex]

    2021 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Results for the mass difference between the long- and short- lived K mesons for physical quark masses,

    B. Wang, “Results for the mass difference between the long- and short- lived K mesons for physical quark masses,” PoS LATTICE2018 (2019) 286, arXiv:1812.05302 [hep-lat]

    2019 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Measurement of the K(L) - K(S) mass difference using semileptonic decays of tagged neutral kaons,

    CPLEAR Collaboration, A. Angelopoulos et al., “Measurement of the K(L) - K(S) mass difference using semileptonic decays of tagged neutral kaons,” Phys. Lett. B 444 (1998) 38–42

    1998

  103. [111]

    Model-independent bounds on new physics effects in non-leptonic tree-level decays of B-mesons,

    A. Lenz and G. Tetlalmatzi-Xolocotzi, “Model-independent bounds on new physics effects in non-leptonic tree-level decays of B-mesons,” JHEP 07 (2020) 177, arXiv:1912.07621 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  104. [112]

    FLAG Review 2021,

    Flavour Lattice Averaging Group (FLAG)Collaboration, Y . Aokiet al., “FLAG Review 2021,”Eur. Phys. J. C 82 no. 10, (2022) 869, arXiv:2111.09849 [hep-lat]

    2022 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,

    M. E. Peskin and T. Takeuchi, “Estimation of oblique electroweak corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 381–409

    1992

  106. [114]

    Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes,

    G. Altarelli and R. Barbieri, “Vacuum polarization effects of new physics on electroweak processes,” Phys. Lett. B 253 (1991) 161–167

    1991

  107. [115]

    Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2,

    R. Barbieri, A. Pomarol, R. Rattazzi, and A. Strumia, “Electroweak symmetry breaking after LEP-1 and LEP-2,” Nucl. Phys. B 703 (2004) 127–146, arXiv:hep-ph/0405040

    2004 arXiv

  108. [116]

    The Seesaw mechanism at arbitrary order: Disentangling the small scale from the large scale,

    W. Grimus and L. Lavoura, “The Seesaw mechanism at arbitrary order: Disentangling the small scale from the large scale,” JHEP 11 (2000) 042, arXiv:hep-ph/0008179

    2000 arXiv

  109. [117]

    A Precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models,

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, “A Precision constraint on multi-Higgs-doublet models,” J. Phys. G 35 (2008) 075001, arXiv:0711.4022 [hep-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  110. [118]

    The Oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models,

    W. Grimus, L. Lavoura, O. M. Ogreid, and P. Osland, “The Oblique parameters in multi-Higgs-doublet models,” Nucl. Phys. B 801 (2008) 81–96, arXiv:0802.4353 [hep-ph] . 96 CHAPTER 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2008 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Precision measurements constraints on the number of Higgs doublets,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, S. Kovalenko, and I. Schmidt, “Precision measurements constraints on the number of Higgs doublets,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 095014, arXiv:1503.03026 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  112. [120]

    Electroweak precision fit and new physics in light of the W boson mass,

    C.-T. Lu, L. Wu, Y . Wu, and B. Zhu, “Electroweak precision fit and new physics in light of the W boson mass,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 3, (2022) 035034, arXiv:2204.03796 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  113. [121]

    Scrutinizing a hidden SM-like gauge model with corrections to oblique parameters,

    V . Q. Tran, T. T. Q. Nguyen, and T.-C. Yuan, “Scrutinizing a hidden SM-like gauge model with corrections to oblique parameters,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 4, (2023) 346, arXiv:2208.10971 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Leading two-loop corrections to the Higgs di-photon decay in the Inert Doublet Model,

    M. Aiko, J. Braathen, and S. Kanemura, “Leading two-loop corrections to the Higgs di-photon decay in the Inert Doublet Model,” arXiv:2307.14976 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  115. [123]

    On the two-loop BSM corrections to h − →γγ in the aligned THDM,

    G. Degrassi and P. Slavich, “On the two-loop BSM corrections to h − →γγ in the aligned THDM,” Eur. Phys. J. C 83 no. 10, (2023) 941, arXiv:2307.02476 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector,

    LHC Higgs Cross Section Working Group Collaboration, D. de Florian et al., “Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 4. Deciphering the Nature of the Higgs Sector,” arXiv:1610.07922 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  117. [125]

    Higgs Boson Production and Decay at Hadron Colliders,

    M. Spira, “Higgs Boson Production and Decay at Hadron Colliders,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 95 (2017) 98–159, arXiv:1612.07651 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  118. [126]

    Higgs Bosons from Two Gluon Annihilation in Proton Proton Collisions,

    H. M. Georgi, S. L. Glashow, M. E. Machacek, and D. V . Nanopoulos, “Higgs Bosons from Two Gluon Annihilation in Proton Proton Collisions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978) 692

    1978

  119. [127]

    Impact of Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Phenomenology of Supersymmetric Models,

    W. G. Hollik, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, “Impact of Vacuum Stability Constraints on the Phenomenology of Supersymmetric Models,” JHEP 03 (2019) 109, arXiv:1812.04644 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  120. [128]

    Vacuum Instabilities in the N2HDM,

    P. M. Ferreira, M. M ¨uhlleitner, R. Santos, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, “Vacuum Instabilities in the N2HDM,” JHEP 09 (2019) 006, arXiv:1905.10234 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Minimizing Higgs Potentials via Numerical Polynomial Homotopy Continuation,

    M. Maniatis and D. Mehta, “Minimizing Higgs Potentials via Numerical Polynomial Homotopy Continuation,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127 (2012) 91, arXiv:1203.0409 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  122. [130]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,

    S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 1. Semiclassical Theory,” Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2929–2936. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 16, 1248 (1977)]

    1977

  123. [131]

    The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,

    C. G. Callan, Jr. and S. R. Coleman, “The Fate of the False Vacuum. 2. First Quantum Corrections,” Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977) 1762–1768

    1977

  124. [132]

    Closed-form expressions of the eigen decomposition of 2 x 2 and 3 x 3 Hermitian matrices,

    C.-A. Deledalle, L. Denis, S. Tabti, and F. Tupin, “Closed-form expressions of the eigen decomposition of 2 x 2 and 3 x 3 Hermitian matrices,” research report, Universit´e de Lyon, 2017. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01501221

    2017

  125. [133]

    SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,

    F. Staub, “SARAH 4 : A tool for (not only SUSY) model builders,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 1773–1790, arXiv:1309.7223 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  126. [134]

    From Superpotential to Model Files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep,

    F. Staub, “From Superpotential to Model Files for FeynArts and CalcHep/CompHep,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 181 (2010) 1077–1086, arXiv:0909.2863 [hep-ph]

    2010 arXiv

  127. [135]

    Automatic Calculation of supersymmetric Renormalization Group Equations and Self Energies,

    F. Staub, “Automatic Calculation of supersymmetric Renormalization Group Equations and Self Energies,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 182 (2011) 808–833, arXiv:1002.0840 [hep-ph]

    2011 arXiv

  128. [136]

    SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more,

    F. Staub, “SARAH 3.2: Dirac Gauginos, UFO output, and more,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1792–1809, arXiv:1207.0906 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH,

    F. Staub, “Exploring new models in all detail with SARAH,” Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015 (2015) 840780, arXiv:1503.04200 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  130. [138]

    SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders,

    W. Porod, “SPheno, a program for calculating supersymmetric spectra, SUSY particle decays and SUSY particle production at e+ e- colliders,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 153 (2003) 275–315, arXiv:hep-ph/0301101. Bibliography 97

    2003 arXiv

  131. [139]

    SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,

    W. Porod and F. Staub, “SPheno 3.1: Extensions including flavour, CP-phases and models beyond the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 183 (2012) 2458–2469, arXiv:1104.1573 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  132. [140]

    HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era,

    P. Bechtle, D. Dercks, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, “HiggsBounds-5: Testing Higgs Sectors in the LHC 13 TeV Era,”Eur. Phys. J. C 80 no. 12, (2020) 1211, arXiv:2006.06007 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  133. [141]

    Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV,

    ATLAS Collaboration, G. Aad et al., “Search for heavy Higgs bosons decaying into two tau leptons with the ATLAS detector using pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 no. 5, (2020) 051801, arXiv:2002.12223 [hep-ex]

    2020 arXiv

  134. [142]

    SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM,

    R. V . Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler, “SusHi: A program for the calculation of Higgs production in gluon fusion and bottom-quark annihilation in the Standard Model and the MSSM,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 1605–1617, arXiv:1212.3249 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  135. [143]

    SusHi Bento: Beyond NNLO and the heavy-top limit,

    R. V . Harlander, S. Liebler, and H. Mantler, “SusHi Bento: Beyond NNLO and the heavy-top limit,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 212 (2017) 239–257, arXiv:1605.03190 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  136. [144]

    Exclusive Signals of an Extended Higgs Sector,

    N. Craig and S. Thomas, “Exclusive Signals of an Extended Higgs Sector,” JHEP 11 (2012) 083, arXiv:1207.4835 [hep-ph]

    2012 arXiv

  137. [145]

    QCD corrections to production of Higgs pseudoscalars,

    R. P. Kauffman and W. Schaffer, “QCD corrections to production of Higgs pseudoscalars,” Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 551–554, arXiv:hep-ph/9305279

    1994 arXiv

  138. [146]

    SUSY Higgs production at proton colliders,

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, “SUSY Higgs production at proton colliders,” Phys. Lett. B 318 (1993) 347–353

    1993

  139. [147]

    Higgs boson production at the LHC,

    M. Spira, A. Djouadi, D. Graudenz, and P. M. Zerwas, “Higgs boson production at the LHC,” Nucl. Phys. B 453 (1995) 17–82, arXiv:hep-ph/9504378

    1995 arXiv

  140. [148]

    Production of a pseudoscalar Higgs boson at hadron colliders at next-to-next-to leading order,

    R. V . Harlander and W. B. Kilgore, “Production of a pseudoscalar Higgs boson at hadron colliders at next-to-next-to leading order,” JHEP 10 (2002) 017, arXiv:hep-ph/0208096

    2002 arXiv

  141. [149]

    Pseudoscalar Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,

    C. Anastasiou and K. Melnikov, “Pseudoscalar Higgs boson production at hadron colliders in NNLO QCD,” Phys. Rev. D 67 (2003) 037501, arXiv:hep-ph/0208115

    2003 arXiv

  142. [150]

    HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era,

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, T. Klingl, T. Stefaniak, G. Weiglein, and J. Wittbrodt, “HiggsSignals-2: Probing new physics with precision Higgs measurements in the LHC 13 TeV era,”Eur. Phys. J. C 81 no. 2, (2021) 145, arXiv:2012.09197 [hep-ph]

    2021 arXiv

  143. [151]

    Applying Exclusion Likelihoods from LHC Searches to Extended Higgs Sectors,

    P. Bechtle, S. Heinemeyer, O. Stal, T. Stefaniak, and G. Weiglein, “Applying Exclusion Likelihoods from LHC Searches to Extended Higgs Sectors,” Eur. Phys. J. C 75 no. 9, (2015) 421, arXiv:1507.06706 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  144. [152]

    Review of particle physics,

    Particle Data Group Collaboration, S. Navas et al., “Review of particle physics,”Phys. Rev. D 110 no. 3, (2024) 030001

    2024

  145. [153]

    Comparison of statistical sampling methods with ScannerBit, the GAMBIT scanning module,

    GAMBIT Collaboration, G. D. Martinez, J. McKay, B. Farmer, P. Scott, E. Roebber, A. Putze, and J. Conrad, “Comparison of statistical sampling methods with ScannerBit, the GAMBIT scanning module,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no. 11, (2017) 761, arXiv:1705.07959 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  146. [154]

    Pippi - painless parsing, post-processing and plotting of posterior and likelihood samples,

    P. Scott, “Pippi - painless parsing, post-processing and plotting of posterior and likelihood samples,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127 (2012) 138, arXiv:1206.2245 [physics.data-an]

    2012 arXiv

  147. [155]

    Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale,

    Z.-j. Tao, “Radiative seesaw mechanism at weak scale,” Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5693–5697, arXiv:hep-ph/9603309

    1996 arXiv

  148. [156]

    Indirect detection constraints on the scotogenic dark matter model,

    T. de Boer, R. Busse, A. Kappes, M. Klasen, and S. Zeinstra, “Indirect detection constraints on the scotogenic dark matter model,” JCAP 08 (2021) 038, arXiv:2105.04899 [hep-ph] . 98 CHAPTER 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY

    2021 arXiv

  149. [157]

    Dark Matter through the Higgs portal,

    G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, “Dark Matter through the Higgs portal,” Phys. Rept. 842 (2020) 1–180, arXiv:1903.03616 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  150. [158]

    Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, “Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints,” Phys. Rept. 405 (2005) 279–390, arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    2005 arXiv

  151. [159]

    micrOMEGAs 3: A program for calculating dark matter observables,

    G. Belanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs 3: A program for calculating dark matter observables,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 185 (2014) 960–985, arXiv:1305.0237 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  152. [160]

    micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,

    G. B ´elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Pukhov, and A. Semenov, “micrOMEGAs4.1: two dark matter candidates,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 192 (2015) 322–329, arXiv:1407.6129 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  153. [161]

    Collider limits on new physics within micrOMEGAs 4.3,

    D. Barducci, G. Belanger, J. Bernon, F. Boudjema, J. Da Silva, S. Kraml, U. Laa, and A. Pukhov, “Collider limits on new physics within micrOMEGAs 4.3,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 222 (2018) 327–338, arXiv:1606.03834 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  154. [162]

    micrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in,

    G. B ´elanger, F. Boudjema, A. Goudelis, A. Pukhov, and B. Zaldivar, “micrOMEGAs5.0 : Freeze-in,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 173–186, arXiv:1801.03509 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  155. [163]

    DarkBit: A GAMBIT module for computing dark matter observables and likelihoods,

    GAMBIT Dark Matter Workgroup Collaboration, T. Bringmann et al., “DarkBit: A GAMBIT module for computing dark matter observables and likelihoods,” Eur. Phys. J. C 77 no. 12, (2017) 831, arXiv:1705.07920 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  156. [164]

    Global analyses of Higgs portal singlet dark matter models using GAMBIT,

    GAMBIT Collaboration, P. Athron et al., “Global analyses of Higgs portal singlet dark matter models using GAMBIT,” Eur. Phys. J. C 79 no. 1, (2019) 38, arXiv:1808.10465 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  157. [165]

    First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,

    XENON Collaboration, E. Aprile et al., “First Dark Matter Search with Nuclear Recoils from the XENONnT Experiment,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 no. 4, (2023) 041003, arXiv:2303.14729 [hep-ex]

    2023 arXiv

  158. [166]

    Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors,

    M. Schumann, L. Baudis, L. B ¨utikofer, A. Kish, and M. Selvi, “Dark matter sensitivity of multi-ton liquid xenon detectors,” JCAP 10 (2015) 016, arXiv:1506.08309 [physics.ins-det]

    2015 arXiv

  159. [167]

    Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,

    J. Billard, L. Strigari, and E. Figueroa-Feliciano, “Implication of neutrino backgrounds on the reach of next generation dark matter direct detection experiments,” Phys. Rev. D 89 no. 2, (2014) 023524, arXiv:1307.5458 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  160. [168]

    Inert Doublet Model in light of LHC Run I and astrophysical data,

    A. Ilnicka, M. Krawczyk, and T. Robens, “Inert Doublet Model in light of LHC Run I and astrophysical data,” Phys. Rev. D 93 no. 5, (2016) 055026, arXiv:1508.01671 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  161. [169]

    Testing the dark matter scenario in the inert doublet model by future precision measurements of the Higgs boson couplings,

    S. Kanemura, M. Kikuchi, and K. Sakurai, “Testing the dark matter scenario in the inert doublet model by future precision measurements of the Higgs boson couplings,” Phys. Rev. D 94 no. 11, (2016) 115011, arXiv:1605.08520 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  162. [170]

    Dark matter in a singlet-extended inert Higgs-doublet model,

    M. O. Khojali, A. Abdalgabar, A. Ahriche, and A. S. Cornell, “Dark matter in a singlet-extended inert Higgs-doublet model,” Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 9, (2022) 095039, arXiv:2206.06211 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  163. [171]

    Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models,

    R. Mohapatra and J. W. F. Valle, “Neutrino Mass and Baryon Number Nonconservation in Superstring Models,” Phys.Rev.D 34 (1986) 1642

    1986

  164. [172]

    Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,

    C. D. Froggatt and H. B. Nielsen, “Hierarchy of Quark Masses, Cabibbo Angles and CP Violation,” Nucl. Phys. B 147 (1979) 277–298

    1979

  165. [173]

    Predictive extended 3HDM with S4 family symmetry,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, C. Espinoza, J. C. G´omez-Izquierdo, J. M. Gonz´alez, and M. Mondrag´on, “Predictive extended 3HDM with S4 family symmetry,” arXiv:2212.12000 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  166. [174]

    Interesting radiative patterns of neutrino mass in an SU(3)(C) x SU(3)(L) x U(1)(X) model with right-handed neutrinos,

    D. Chang and H. N. Long, “Interesting radiative patterns of neutrino mass in an SU(3)(C) x SU(3)(L) x U(1)(X) model with right-handed neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D73 (2006) 053006, arXiv:hep-ph/0603098 [hep-ph]. Bibliography 99

    2006 arXiv

  167. [175]

    A variant of 3-3-1 model for the generation of the SM fermion mass and mixing pattern,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, S. Kovalenko, H. N. Long, and I. Schmidt, “A variant of 3-3-1 model for the generation of the SM fermion mass and mixing pattern,” JHEP 07 (2018) 144, arXiv:1705.09169 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  168. [176]

    Minimal model for the fermion flavor structure, mass hierarchy, dark matter, leptogenesis, and the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments,

    A. E. C ´arcamo Hern´andez, D. T. Huong, and H. N. Long, “Minimal model for the fermion flavor structure, mass hierarchy, dark matter, leptogenesis, and the electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments,”Phys. Rev. D 102 no. 5, (2020) 055002, arXiv:1910.12877 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  169. [177]

    Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics,

    H. Ishimori, T. Kobayashi, H. Ohki, Y . Shimizu, H. Okada, and M. Tanimoto, “Non-Abelian Discrete Symmetries in Particle Physics,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 183 (2010) 1–163, arXiv:1003.3552 [hep-th]

    2010 arXiv

  170. [178]

    Lepton Number Violation With Quasi Dirac Neutrinos,

    J. W. F. Valle and M. Singer, “Lepton Number Violation With Quasi Dirac Neutrinos,”Phys. Rev. D28 (1983) 540

    1983

  171. [179]

    The 331 model with right handed neutrinos,

    H. N. Long, “The 331 model with right handed neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 437–445, arXiv:hep-ph/9504274

    1996 arXiv

  172. [180]

    Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism,

    M. Malinsky, J. C. Romao, and J. W. F. Valle, “Novel supersymmetric SO(10) seesaw mechanism,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (2005) 161801, arXiv:hep-ph/0506296

    2005 arXiv

  173. [181]

    Enhancement of H → γγ in SU (5) model with 45H 1 plet,

    S. Khalil and S. Salem, “Enhancement of H → γγ in SU (5) model with 45H 1 plet,” Nucl. Phys. B 876 (2013) 473–492, arXiv:1304.3689 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  174. [182]

    Constraining Flavor Changing Interactions from LHC Run-2 Dilepton Bounds with Vector Mediators,

    F. S. Queiroz, C. Siqueira, and J. W. F. Valle, “Constraining Flavor Changing Interactions from LHC Run-2 Dilepton Bounds with Vector Mediators,”Phys. Lett. B 763 (2016) 269–274, arXiv:1608.07295 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  175. [183]

    331 Models Facing the Tensions in ∆F = 2 Processes with the Impact on ε′/ε, Bs → µ+µ− and B → K ∗µ+µ−,

    A. J. Buras and F. De Fazio, “331 Models Facing the Tensions in ∆F = 2 Processes with the Impact on ε′/ε, Bs → µ+µ− and B → K ∗µ+µ−,” JHEP 08 (2016) 115, arXiv:1604.02344 [hep-ph]

    2016 arXiv

  176. [184]

    CP4 miracle: shaping Yukawa sector with CP symmetry of order four,

    P. M. Ferreira, I. P. Ivanov, E. Jim´enez, R. Pasechnik, and H. Serˆodio, “CP4 miracle: shaping Yukawa sector with CP symmetry of order four,” JHEP 01 (2018) 065, arXiv:1711.02042 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  177. [185]

    Nondecoupling of charged scalars in Higgs decay to two photons and symmetries of the scalar potential,

    G. Bhattacharyya and D. Das, “Nondecoupling of charged scalars in Higgs decay to two photons and symmetries of the scalar potential,” Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 015005, arXiv:1408.6133 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  178. [186]

    TASI 2013 lectures on Higgs physics within and beyond the Standard Model,

    H. E. Logan, “TASI 2013 lectures on Higgs physics within and beyond the Standard Model,” arXiv:1406.1786 [hep-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  179. [187]

    A renormalizable left-right symmetric model with low scale seesaw mechanisms,

    A. E. C. Hern ´andez and I. Schmidt, “A renormalizable left-right symmetric model with low scale seesaw mechanisms,” arXiv:2101.02718 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  180. [188]

    Recent measurements of higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with the cms detector,

    P. Saha, “Recent measurements of higgs boson properties in the diphoton decay channel with the cms detector,” in Proceedings of the XXIV DAE-BRNS High Energy Physics Symposium, Jatni, India, B. Mohanty, S. K. Swain, R. Singh, and V . K. S. Kashyap, eds., pp. 183–186. Springer ...

    2022

  181. [189]

    Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at √s = 13 TeV in the H → γγ channel using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment,

    ATLAS Collaboration, “Measurement of the properties of Higgs boson production at √s = 13 TeV in the H → γγ channel using 139 fb−1 of pp collision data with the ATLAS experiment,” arXiv:2207.00348 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  182. [190]

    S, T, U parameters in SU(3)(C) x SU(3)(L) x U(1) model with right-handed neutrinos,

    H. N. Long and T. Inami, “S, T, U parameters in SU(3)(C) x SU(3)(L) x U(1) model with right-handed neutrinos,” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 075002, arXiv:hep-ph/9902475

    2000 arXiv

  183. [191]

    Some phenomenological aspects of the 3-3-1 model with the C´arcamo-Kovalenko-Schmidt mechanism,

    H. N. Long, N. V . Hop, L. T. Hue, N. H. Thao, and A. E. C´arcamo Hern´andez, “Some phenomenological aspects of the 3-3-1 model with the C´arcamo-Kovalenko-Schmidt mechanism,”Phys. Rev. D 100 no. 1, (2019) 015004, arXiv:1810.00605 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  184. [192]

    W-mass anomaly in the simplest linear seesaw mechanism,

    A. Batra, P. Bharadwaj, S. Mandal, R. Srivastava, and J. W. F. Valle, “W-mass anomaly in the simplest linear seesaw mechanism,” Phys. Lett. B 834 (2022) 137408, arXiv:2208.04983 [hep-ph] . Appendix A Symmetry groups A.1 Discrete symmetry groups. Imagine having an object with a...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools