Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 51 references

A 2PI real-time resummation scheme yields a gauge-independent next-to-leading-order effective potential for very strong first-order phase transitions in the Abelian Higgs model, where dimensional reduction breaks down.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 08:05 UTC pith:C3INFJSP

load-bearing objection The 2PI scheme is a real step forward, but the Nielsen-identity check hinges on an unproven relation and the beyond-DR claim is not tested. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.21252 v1 pith:C3INFJSP submitted 2026-07-23 hep-ph

Thermal Resummation for Very Strong First-order Phase Transitions

Philipp Klose This is my paper
classification hep-ph
keywords effective potentialthermal resummation2PI effective actionNielsen identityAbelian Higgs modelstrong first-order phase transitiongravitational wavesdimensional reduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Very strong first-order phase transitions in the early universe could produce gravitational-wave backgrounds detectable by LISA, but the standard method for computing their effective potential—dimensional reduction—relies on a high-temperature expansion that breaks down exactly in this regime. This paper argues that two-particle-irreducible (2PI) effective-action techniques, implemented in a real-time formalism, provide a consistent resummation that remains valid for such transitions. It computes the next-to-leading-order effective potential of the Abelian Higgs model in a general covariant gauge and shows that the result satisfies the leading-order Nielsen identity, making predictions for phase transition strength and bubble nucleation rate gauge-parameter independent. The potential also reduces to a Daisy-resummed potential under a modified power counting and agrees with dimensional reduction for small condensates. If correct, this supplies a first-principles route to gravitational-wave predictions where established techniques are unreliable.

Core claim

Central claim: a 2PI (two-particle-irreducible) real-time resummation scheme yields the next-to-leading-order effective potential of the Abelian Higgs model for very strong first-order phase transitions, where dimensional reduction fails. The result, Eq. (82), is ΔV_eff = -½μ²φ² + ¼λφ⁴ + V_cw + 2J(mA,0)+J(MA,mD)+J(Mχ,M0)-J(mc,0). The paper shows it satisfies the leading-order Nielsen identity ξ∂ξV_NLO = mc²[I(Mχ)-I(mc)], so minima and bubble-nucleation predictions are gauge-parameter independent; it reduces to a standard Daisy-resummed potential under the λ~g^4 power counting, and matches dimensional reduction for small condensates. Scope note: the paper treats only the effective potential,

What carries the argument

The engine is the 2PI (two-particle-irreducible) effective action in the real-time closed-time-path formalism. The paper derives V'_eff from the condensate equation of motion in terms of resummed spectral functions (the energy distributions of each particle species), then solves the gap equations by replacing each particle's spectral function with a zero-momentum, symmetric-phase delta-function propagator at a thermally shifted mass: ρs = sign(k0)πδ(k²-M_s²) for scalars, and a corresponding resummed photon spectral function. These thermally shifted masses carry the NLO in-medium physics. The Nielsen identity ξ∂ξV_NLO = mc²[I(Mχ)-I(mc)] is the mechanism that establishes gauge-parameter indepe

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that each particle's thermal self-energy can be treated as momentum-independent and equal to its value in the symmetric phase for every condensate up to the broken-phase minimum; a secondary restriction is that the temperature stays high enough that the effective Goldstone mass squared remains positive, keeping the symmetric phase metastable.

What would settle it

Compute the full φ-dependent and momentum-dependent thermal self-energies in the broken phase and check whether using them instead of the symmetric-phase, zero-momentum thermal masses changes V' at O(g) for soft condensates φ~T; a nonzero change at that order would show Eq. (82) is missing NLO terms. A complementary test is a direct 4D lattice simulation of the Abelian Higgs model at λ~g^4: if the predicted bubble nucleation rate differs beyond the claimed NLO uncertainty, the resummation is incomplete.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If Eq. (82) is correct, the bubble nucleation rate and transition strength for strong Abelian Higgs transitions can be computed gauge-independently, removing a known source of theoretical uncertainty.
  • The result extends thermal resummation into the supercooled-strong regime φmin ≳ πT/g, where dimensional reduction and 3D lattice effective theories are no longer reliable.
  • The paper's finding that a consistent power counting turns the Daisy-resummed potential into a gauge-independent result suggests existing Daisy codes can be salvaged by imposing the same λ~g^4 counting.
  • Because the Higgs loop enters only at N2LO while gauge, Goldstone, and ghost loops carry the NLO terms, the potential's structure differs from naive Daisy resummation, which mixes orders.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A step the paper does not take: plug Eq. (82) into a bounce action and compute the gravitational-wave spectrum for a strong Abelian Higgs transition; that would quantify how much the resummation shifts peak frequency and amplitude relative to established methods.
  • The central approximation invites a direct test: compute φ-dependent self-energies at NLO. If they alter the barrier height at O(g) for φ~T, the NLO potential in Eq. (82) would need those terms in exactly the region that controls nucleation.
  • The paper leaves the kinetic wave-function corrections and fluctuation determinant to future work; completing them in the same 2PI scheme is necessary before full nucleation-rate predictions are quantitative.
  • If the scheme generalizes to non-Abelian theories with fermions, it could cover many standard-model extensions with supercooled transitions; the Abelian Higgs model is the minimal case that carries the gauge-structure test.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a real-time, 2PI-based resummation scheme for the finite-temperature effective potential and applies it to the Abelian Higgs model in a general R_ξ gauge, focusing on the strong-transition regime λ∼g^4, φ_min≳πT/g. The central result is the NLO potential of Eq. (82): ΔV_eff = -½μ²φ² + ¼λφ⁴ + V_cw + 2J(m_A,0) + J(M_A,m_D) + J(M_χ,M_0) - J(m_c,0). Three supporting claims are made: (i) the potential satisfies the leading-order Nielsen identity, Eq. (104), so that gauge-parameter dependence cancels at leading order; (ii) it reduces to a Daisy-resummed potential under the appropriate power counting; and (iii) it reproduces the dimensional-reduction result of [36] for small condensates. The paper also spells out a step-by-step recipe for computing 2PI-resummed effective potentials in the real-time formalism.

Significance. If correct, the paper would provide a first-principles resummation method that remains valid where the high-temperature expansion underlying dimensional reduction breaks down, directly relevant for LISA-era predictions of strongly first-order phase transitions. The explicit algebraic check of the Nielsen identity structure in Eq. (104), the transparent power counting of Section 3.1, and the comparison with the independent dimensional-reduction calculation in Section 3.3 are genuine strengths. However, the Nielsen-identity proof hinges on an unproven relation, Eq. (99a), and the central derivation contains an internal inconsistency in the printed photon spectral function, Eq. (78b). These issues are local and fixable, but they must be resolved before the gauge-independence and completeness claims can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix A, Eq. (99a)] The relation δ̄m²_χ = -m²_χ + m²_c + V'_LO(φ)/φ is introduced as 'After a straightforward computation, one finds' with no derivation. This relation is load-bearing: it is used to evaluate the Goldstone/ghost spectral integral (101a)–(101b) and hence to obtain C_LO in Eq. (103) and the Nielsen identity (104). Without a derivation (or an explicit statement that it is an assumption with a power-counting justification), Eq. (104) only shows that the proposed V_NLO has the correct ξ-derivative form; it does not prove that this V_NLO is the derivative of the 2PI-resummed potential. Please supply the derivation or a detailed argument from the gap equation, including the order in g at which Eq. (99a) is exact.
  2. [Section 3.2, Eq. (78b)] The printed resummed photon spectral function assigns the Debye mass to the transverse component: ρ_A = -P_T sign(k0)πδ(k²-M_A²) - P_L sign(k0)πδ(k²-m_A²) - P_D ξρ_c, with M_A²=m_A²+m_D². This contradicts Eq. (75), which states δm²_T=O(g^4) and δm²_L=m_D², and also contradicts Eq. (116). Moreover, substituting Eq. (78b) into Eq. (60) would give a coefficient 2 for [I(M_A)-I(m_A)] in V'_NLO, whereas Eq. (80) has coefficient 1. The final potential (82) appears to use the correct longitudinal Debye mass, so the error is likely typographical, but it must be corrected and the derivation of Eq. (80) made consistent with the stated spectral functions.
  3. [Section 3.2, after Eq. (74)] The resummed spectral functions are obtained by evaluating self-energies at zero external momenta and setting φ→0, and this is assumed to give the complete NLO potential for all φ between 0 and φ_min. This is a load-bearing assumption because the barrier region, φ∼T, is precisely where the potential is used for bubble-nucleation predictions. Please provide an explicit power-counting estimate of the dropped φ- and momentum-dependent parts of Π^H_s and Π^H_{T,L}, in particular for soft momenta k∼gT, and justify that these are uniformly N2LO. Without such an estimate, the completeness of Eq. (82) is not established.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript contains numerous typos and grammatical errors (e.g., 'signficantly', 'apropriate', 'Dimenional reduction', 'obserevation', 'transtions', 'feasable', 'Heavyside', 'effecte potential', 'formalim', 'compution', 'counter-part', 'equilibirum', 'stratey', 'renormalizeation'). A careful proofread is needed.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (91)] The notation 'T lim_{φ→0} V_3d_eff,LO' is slightly confusing: it would be clearer to write the field-independent shift explicitly as T m_D^3/(12π) and to show the cancellation in Eq. (92) step by step.
  3. [Section 3.2, footnote 4] The condition M_0²>0 (μ<gT/√12<m_D) is stated in a footnote but it restricts the temperature range for which the derivation applies. This restriction should be highlighted in the main text, since it is relevant for the claimed regime of strong transitions.
  4. [Section 2.2, Eq. (29)] The derivation of the 2PI expression for V'_eff, Eq. (30), is only sketched. A short appendix or additional explanation of how the G_variation leads to (30) would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Partial circularity: the Nielsen-identity check is satisfied by construction via the unproved relation Eq. (99a).

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Appendix A, Eqs. (99a), (101b), (103)-(104)]
    "After a straightforward computation, one finds δ̄m²χ = -m²χ + m²c + V′_LO(φ)/φ ... (99a) ... Hence, we obtain our final result C_LOV′_LO = m²c[I(Mχ)-I(mc)] (103) ... ξ∂ξV_NLO = m²c[I(Mχ)-I(mc)] (104)."

    The only nontrivial input in the computation of C_LO is Eq. (99a), which with M̄χ²=mχ²+δ̄m²χ and M̄c²≈mc² is equivalent to M̄χ²-M̄c²=V′_LO/φ. Inserted into Eqs. (101a)-(101b), this forces C_LOV′_LO=mc²[I(Mχ)-I(mc)] — exactly the same function Eq. (104) obtains from ξ∂ξV_NLO, because the potential in Eqs. (81)/(82) was built with Mχ²-M0²=mc². No derivation or citation supports (99a), so the advertised gauge-independence check does not independently verify the identity; it encodes the asserted relation and then recovers it.

full rationale

Apart from Appendix A, the derivation of the NLO potential is not circular: the thermal masses (m_D², δm_χ²) are taken from independent results [46,36], the small-condensate comparison with [36] is an external benchmark, and there is no load-bearing self-citation. The circularity is confined to the gauge-independence proof. Eq. (99a) is introduced without derivation and is the exact relation needed to make C_LOV′_LO equal to ξ∂ξV_NLO; the subsequent algebra in Eqs. (101)-(104) is a rearrangement. Because gauge-parameter independence is a central advertised result of the paper, this constitutes partial circularity (score 6). If Eq. (99a) can be independently derived from the 2PI gap equations or a separate Ward identity, this would downgrade to a missing-proof/correctness concern; as written, the check is satisfied by construction. Separately, Eq. (78b) appears to swap the transverse and longitudinal Debye assignments relative to Eqs. (75)/(115), but this is an internal-consistency/typo issue rather than a circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 7 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard external results (thermal masses from [46,36]), the assumed power counting for strong transitions (λ~g⁴, μ²~g²T²), the approximation of solving the gap equations by zero-momentum symmetric-phase masses, and one asserted relation (99a) for the Goldstone thermal mass used in the Nielsen check. No free fitted parameters and no invented entities (no new particles, forces, or dimensions) appear. All inputs are either theory parameters or previously computed physical quantities.

axioms (7)
  • domain assumption Debye and Goldstone thermal masses: m²D = g²T²/3, δm²χ = g²T²/4, δm²c = O(g⁴), taken from prior literature [46,36].
    Eqs. (75)-(77). These are external standard results, not derived in this paper; the NLO potential (82) depends on them directly.
  • domain assumption Zero-momentum, φ→0 self-energies replace the full momentum- and φ-dependent gap-equation solutions.
    Section 3.2, Eq. (74): 'we evaluate the self-energies at zero external momenta and set φ→0.' Assumed to capture all O(g²) IR-regulating physics at NLO for every φ.
  • domain assumption Late-time equilibration of the real-time 2PI dynamics reproduces the Euclidean equilibrium effective potential.
    Section 2.1, Eqs. (7)-(10): surface terms are argued to be suppressed at late times; no rigorous proof is given.
  • ad hoc to paper δ̄m²χ = -m²χ + m²c + V'_LO(φ)/φ (Eq. 99a), the φ-dependent Goldstone thermal-mass relation.
    Appendix A: 'After a straightforward computation, one finds.' This relation converts the Nielsen coefficient into C_LO V'_LO = m²c[I(Mχ)-I(mc)]; it is load-bearing for the Nielsen identity claim and is asserted, not derived in the text.
  • domain assumption Strong-transition power counting λ ~ g⁴, μ² ~ g²T², mA = gφ ~ πT in the broken phase.
    Section 3.1, Eqs. (48)-(51): derived from φmin ≳ πT/g using the perturbative formula (49) from [43]. Defines what 'strong transition' means and which diagrams are NLO vs N2LO.
  • standard math KMS relations hold for the resummed propagators.
    Section 2.2, Eq. (20): needed so that only the spectral-function equation is non-trivial.
  • domain assumption M²0 ~ g³T² rescaling imposed for the comparison with [36].
    Section 3.3, Eq. (88): to compare with [36], the paper imposes a different M²0 scaling than its own Eq. (51) and drops Goldstone/ghost terms; the comparison (89) is therefore only a partial cross-check.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 21033 in / 50888 out tokens · 503413 ms · 2026-08-01T08:05:57.899889+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Effective potentials are a key ingredient for predicting stochastic gravitational wave backgrounds from strong first-order phase transitions in the early universe. Established techniques for a robust computation, including dimensional reduction, rely on a high-temperature expansion that is expected to break down for very strong transitions capable of producing observable backgrounds at next-generation gravitational wave detectors such as LISA. We argue that existing 2PI effective action techniques enable consistent resummation for such transitions, and use them to compute the next-to-leading order effective potential of the Abelian Higgs model for a strong transition in a general covariant gauge. We find that our result can be recovered from a Daisy resummed potential by modifying the power counting, and show explicitly that it satisfies the leading-order Nielsen identity needed for gauge-independent predictions of the bubble nucleation rate and is consistent with prior results for small Higgs condensates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.21252 by Philipp Klose.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Feynman diagram topologies with three or fewer loops that contribute to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Feynman diagram topologies with three or fewer loops that contribute to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Feynam diagrams that contribute to the effective potential at LO, NLO, and N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature

    L. Dolan and R. Jackiw. “Symmetry Behavior at Finite Temperature”. In:Phys. Rev. D9 (1974), pp. 3320–3341.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.9.3320

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.9.3320 1974

  2. [2]

    Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories

    D. A. Kirzhnits and Andrei D. Linde. “Symmetry Behavior in Gauge Theories”. In:Annals Phys. 101 (1976), pp. 195–238.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90279-7

    doi:10.1016/0003-4916(76)90279-7 1976

  3. [3]

    Resummation in a hot scalar field theory

    Rajesh R. Parwani. “Resummation in a hot scalar field theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D45 (1992). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 48, 5965 (1993)], p. 4695.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 45 . 4695. arXiv: hep-ph/9204216

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  4. [4]

    The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order

    Peter Brockway Arnold and Olivier Espinosa. “The Effective potential and first order phase transitions: Beyond leading-order”. In:Phys. Rev. D47 (1993). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 50, 6662 (1994)], p. 3546.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.3546. arXiv:hep-ph/9212235

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  5. [5]

    Gravity Waves from a Cosmological Phase Transition: Gauge Artifacts and Daisy Resummations

    Carroll Wainwright, Stefano Profumo and Michael J. Ramsey-Musolf. “Gravity Waves from a Cosmological Phase Transition: Gauge Artifacts and Daisy Resummations”. In:Phys. Rev. D84 (2011), p. 023521.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.023521. arXiv:1104.5487 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  6. [6]

    Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions

    Djuna Croon et al. “Theoretical uncertainties for cosmological first-order phase transitions”. In: JHEP04 (2021), p. 055.doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2021)055. arXiv:2009.10080 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    3-d physics and the electroweak phase transition: A Framework for lattice Monte Carlo analysis

    K. Farakos et al. “3-d physics and the electroweak phase transition: A Framework for lattice Monte Carlo analysis”. In:Nucl. Phys. B442 (1995), pp. 317–363.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(95)80129-4. arXiv:hep-lat/9412091

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  8. [8]

    Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atmH ≳m W?

    K. Kajantie et al. “Is there a hot electroweak phase transition atmH ≳m W?” In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996), pp. 2887–2890.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.2887. arXiv:hep-ph/9605288

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  9. [9]

    The Two loop finite temperature effective potential of the MSSM and baryogenesis

    Marta Losada. “The Two loop finite temperature effective potential of the MSSM and baryogenesis”. In:Nucl. Phys. B537 (1999), pp. 3–31.doi: 10.1016/S0550- 3213(98)00563- X . arXiv: hep- ph/9806519

    arXiv 1999

  10. [10]

    Dimensional reduction of the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature

    Jens O. Andersen. “Dimensional reduction of the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature”. In: Eur. Phys. J. C11 (1999), pp. 563–570.doi:10.1007/s100520050655. arXiv:hep-ph/9804280

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  11. [11]

    Electroweak phase transition in the real triplet extension of the SM: Dimensional reduction

    Lauri Niemi et al. “Electroweak phase transition in the real triplet extension of the SM: Dimensional reduction”. In:Phys. Rev. D100.3 (2019), p. 035002.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.035002. arXiv: 1802.10500 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    Three-dimensional effective theories for the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature

    Tyler Gorda et al. “Three-dimensional effective theories for the two Higgs doublet model at high temperature”. In:JHEP02 (2019), p. 081.doi: 10.1007/JHEP02(2019)081. arXiv: 1802.05056 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  13. [13]

    Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition

    Lauri Niemi et al. “Thermodynamics of a Two-Step Electroweak Phase Transition”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.126.17 (2021), p. 171802.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.171802. arXiv: 2005.11332 [hep-ph]. 24

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  14. [14]

    Higher-order-operatorcorrectionstophase-transitionparametersindimensional reduction

    MikaelChalaetal.“Higher-order-operatorcorrectionstophase-transitionparametersindimensional reduction”. In:JHEP10 (2024), p. 025.doi: 10.1007/JHEP10(2024)025 . arXiv: 2406.02667 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Higher-dimensional operators at finite temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions

    Fabio Bernardo et al. “Higher-dimensional operators at finite temperature affect gravitational-wave predictions”. In:JHEP08 (2025), p. 109.doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2025)109. arXiv: 2503.18904 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pau Amaro-Seoane et al. “Laser Interferometer Space Antenna”. In: (Feb. 2017). arXiv:1702.00786 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  17. [17]

    Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

    Pierre Auclair et al. “Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna”. In:Living Rev. Rel.26.1 (2023), p. 5.doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00045-2. arXiv:2204.05434 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    Exact relation of lattice and continuum parameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories

    M. Laine. “Exact relation of lattice and continuum parameters in three-dimensional SU(2) + Higgs theories”. In:Nucl. Phys. B451 (1995), pp. 484–504.doi: 10.1016/0550- 3213(95)00356- W . arXiv:hep-lat/9504001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  19. [19]

    A Nonperturbative analysis of the finite T phase transition in SU(2) x U(1) electroweak theory

    K. Kajantie et al. “A Nonperturbative analysis of the finite T phase transition in SU(2) x U(1) electroweak theory”. In:Nucl. Phys. B493 (1997), pp. 413–438.doi: 10 . 1016 / S0550 - 3213(97)00164-8. arXiv:hep-lat/9612006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  20. [20]

    Lattice continuum relations for 3-D SU(N) + Higgs theories

    M. Laine and A. Rajantie. “Lattice continuum relations for 3-D SU(N) + Higgs theories”. In: Nucl. Phys. B513 (1998), pp. 471–489.doi: 10.1016/S0550- 3213(97)00709- 8 . arXiv: hep- lat/9705003

    arXiv 1998

  21. [21]

    The MSSM electroweak phase transition on the lattice

    M. Laine and K. Rummukainen. “The MSSM electroweak phase transition on the lattice”. In: Nucl. Phys. B535 (1998), pp. 423–457.doi: 10.1016/S0550- 3213(98)00530- 6 . arXiv: hep- lat/9804019

    arXiv 1998

  22. [22]

    Lattice study of an electroweak phase transition at mh ⋍ 126 GeV

    M. Laine, G. Nardini and K. Rummukainen. “Lattice study of an electroweak phase transition at mh ⋍ 126 GeV”. In:JCAP01 (2013), p. 011.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2013/01/011. arXiv: 1211.7344 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  23. [23]

    Electroweak phase transitions

    Z. Fodor. “Electroweak phase transitions”. In:Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.83 (2000). Ed. by M. Campostrini et al., pp. 121–125.doi: 10 . 1016 / S0920 - 5632(00 ) 91603 - 7. arXiv: hep - lat/9909162

    arXiv 2000

  24. [24]

    Chiral gauge theories revisited

    Martin Luscher. “Chiral gauge theories revisited”. In:Subnucl. Ser.38 (2002). Ed. by A. Zichichi, pp. 41–89.doi:10.1142/9789812778253_0002. arXiv:hep-th/0102028

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  25. [25]

    Lattice QCD at high temperature and density

    F. Karsch. “Lattice QCD at high temperature and density”. In:Lect. Notes Phys.583 (2002). Ed. by Willibald Plessas and L. Mathelitsch, pp. 209–249.doi:10.1007/3-540-45792-5_6. arXiv: hep-lat/0106019

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  26. [26]

    Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD

    A. Bazavov et al. “Equation of state in ( 2+1 )-flavor QCD”. In:Phys. Rev. D90 (2014), p. 094503. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.094503. arXiv:1407.6387 [hep-lat]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Resummation methods at finite temperature: The Tadpole way

    C. Glenn Boyd, David E. Brahm and Stephen D. H. Hsu. “Resummation methods at finite temperature: The Tadpole way”. In:Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), pp. 4963–4973.doi: 10 . 1103 / PhysRevD.48.4963. arXiv:hep-ph/9304254

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  28. [28]

    Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions

    David Curtin, Patrick Meade and Harikrishnan Ramani. “Thermal Resummation and Phase Transitions”. In:Eur. Phys. J. C78.9 (2018), p. 787.doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6268-0. arXiv:1612.00466 [hep-ph]. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    Gravitational waves and tadpole resummation: Efficient and easy convergence of finite temperature QFT

    David Curtin, Jyotirmoy Roy and Graham White. “Gravitational waves and tadpole resummation: Efficient and easy convergence of finite temperature QFT”. In:Phys. Rev. D109.11 (2024), p. 116001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.116001. arXiv:2211.08218 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    Effective Action for Composite Operators

    John M. Cornwall, R. Jackiw and E. Tomboulis. “Effective Action for Composite Operators”. In: Phys. Rev. D10 (1974), pp. 2428–2445.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2428

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.10.2428 1974

  31. [31]

    Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology

    Jurgen Berges. “Nonequilibrium Quantum Fields: From Cold Atoms to Cosmology”. In: (Mar. 2015). arXiv:1503.02907 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Selfconsistent improvement of the finite temperature effective potential

    G. Amelino-Camelia and So-Young Pi. “Selfconsistent improvement of the finite temperature effective potential”. In:Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), pp. 2356–2362.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.47.2356. arXiv:hep-ph/9211211

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1993

  33. [33]

    Selfconsistently improved finite temperature effective potential for gauge theories

    G. Amelino-Camelia. “Selfconsistently improved finite temperature effective potential for gauge theories”. In:Phys. Rev. D49 (1994), pp. 2740–2751.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.49.2740. arXiv: hep-ph/9305222

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  34. [34]

    Gravitational Waves from Confining Dark Sectors with Self-Consistent Effective Potentials

    Rachel Houtz, Martha Ulloa and Mia West. “Gravitational Waves from Confining Dark Sectors with Self-Consistent Effective Potentials”. In: (Nov. 2025). arXiv:2511.23467 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking

    Dimitrios Metaxas and Erick J. Weinberg. “Gauge independence of the bubble nucleation rate in theories with radiative symmetry breaking”. In:Phys. Rev. D53 (1996), pp. 836–843.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.836. arXiv:hep-ph/9507381

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  36. [36]

    Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory

    Joonas Hirvonen et al. “Computing the gauge-invariant bubble nucleation rate in finite temperature effective field theory”. In:JHEP07 (2022), p. 135.doi: 10 . 1007 / JHEP07(2022 ) 135. arXiv: 2112.08912 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Frame- work

    Johan Löfgren et al. “Nucleation at Finite Temperature: A Gauge-Invariant Perturbative Frame- work”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.130.25 (2023), p. 251801.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.251801. arXiv:2112.05472 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Mikko Laine and Aleksi Vuorinen.Basics of Thermal Field Theory. Vol. 925. Springer, 2016.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31933-9. arXiv:1701.01554 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [39]

    Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part 1

    Tomislav Prokopec, Michael G. Schmidt and Steffen Weinstock. “Transport equations for chiral fermions to order h bar and electroweak baryogenesis. Part 1”. In:Annals Phys.314 (2004), pp. 208–265.doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.06.002. arXiv:hep-ph/0312110

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  40. [40]

    Particle Physics and Dark Energy: Beyond Classical Dynamics

    Mathias Garny. “Particle Physics and Dark Energy: Beyond Classical Dynamics”. Other thesis. Oct. 2008

    2008

  41. [41]

    Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking

    Sidney R. Coleman and Erick J. Weinberg. “Radiative Corrections as the Origin of Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking”. In:Phys. Rev. D7 (1973), pp. 1888–1910.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.7.1888

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.7.1888 1973

  42. [42]

    Stop comparing resummation methods

    Johan Löfgren. “Stop comparing resummation methods”. In:J. Phys. G50.12 (2023), p. 125008. doi:10.1088/1361-6471/ad074b. arXiv:2301.05197 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory

    Andreas Ekstedt, Philipp Schicho and Tuomas V. I. Tenkanen. “Cosmological phase transitions at three loops: The final verdict on perturbation theory”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.9 (2024), p. 096006. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.096006. arXiv:2405.18349 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model

    K. Kajantie et al. “Generic rules for high temperature dimensional reduction and their application to the standard model”. In:Nucl. Phys. B458 (1996), pp. 90–136.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(95) 00549-8. arXiv:hep-ph/9508379. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  45. [45]

    The Order of the metal to superconductor transition

    S. Mo, J. Hove and A. Sudbo. “The Order of the metal to superconductor transition”. In:Phys. Rev. B65 (2002), p. 104501.doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.104501. arXiv:cond-mat/0109260

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  46. [46]

    3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: Perturbation theory

    K. Farakos et al. “3-D physics and the electroweak phase transition: Perturbation theory”. In:Nucl. Phys. B425 (1994), pp. 67–109.doi: 10.1016/0550-3213(94)90173-2. arXiv: hep-ph/9404201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  47. [47]

    Finite-temperature bubble nucleation with shifting scale hierarchies

    Maciej Kierkla et al. “Finite-temperature bubble nucleation with shifting scale hierarchies”. In: JHEP07 (2025), p. 153.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)153. arXiv:2503.13597 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Structure of the gluon propagator at finite temperature

    H. Arthur Weldon. “Structure of the gluon propagator at finite temperature”. In:Annals Phys. 271 (1999), pp. 141–156.doi:10.1006/aphy.1998.5873. arXiv:hep-ph/9701279

    arXiv 1999

  49. [49]

    Soft gluon self-energy at finite temperature and density: hard NLO corrections in general covariant gauge

    Tyler Gorda et al. “Soft gluon self-energy at finite temperature and density: hard NLO corrections in general covariant gauge”. In:JHEP08 (2023), p. 021.doi: 10.1007/JHEP08(2023)021. arXiv: 2304.09187 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Beyond the daisy chain: running and the 3D EFT view of supercooled phase transitions

    Martin Christiansen et al. “Beyond the daisy chain: running and the 3D EFT view of supercooled phase transitions”. In:JHEP05 (2026), p. 014.doi: 10.1007/JHEP05(2026)014. arXiv: 2511. 02910 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2026)014 2026

  51. [51]

    Higher-dimensional operators and Polyakov loop in hot Scalar QED from the heat kernel

    Siddhartha Bandyopadhyay et al. “Higher-dimensional operators and Polyakov loop in hot Scalar QED from the heat kernel”. In: (June 2026). arXiv:2606.09779 [hep-ph]. 27

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026