Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On the dimensionality of spacetime

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv gr-qc/9702052 v2 pith:CGLZL6LL submitted 1997-02-25 gr-qc hep-phhep-th

classification gr-qchep-phhep-th
keywords observersdimensionaldimensionslessspacespacetimetheoriesthree
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Some superstring theories have more than one effective low-energy limit, corresponding to classical spacetimes with different dimensionalities. We argue that all but the 3+1-dimensional one might correspond to ``dead worlds'', devoid of observers, in which case all such ensemble theories would actually predict that we should find ourselves inhabiting a 3+1-dimensional spacetime. With more or less than one time-dimension, the partial differential equations of nature would lack the hyperbolicity property that enables observers to make predictions. In a space with more than three dimensions, there can be no traditional atoms and perhaps no stable structures. A space with less than three dimensions allows no gravitational force and may be too simple and barren to contain observers.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Why 4D? Spontaneous Dimensional Selection from Gauge Criticality

    hep-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Gauge criticality of Yang–Mills, via racetrack confinement and 3D dynamical SUSY breaking, can stabilize radii so that a macroscopic 4D spacetime emerges without being put in by hand.

Pith tools