REVIEW 1 cited by
Co-accretion + giant impact origin of the Uranus system: Tilting Impact
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The origin of the Uranian satellite system remains uncertain. The four major satellites have nearly circular, co-planar orbits and the ratio of the satellite system and planetary mass resembles Jupiter's satellite system, suggesting the Uranian system was similarly formed within a disk produced by gas co-accretion. However, Uranus is a retrograde rotator with a high obliquity. The satellites orbit in its highly tilted equatorial plane in the same sense as the planet's retrograde rotation, a configuration that cannot be explained by co-accretion alone. In this work we investigate the first stages of the co-accretion + giant impact scenario proposed by Morbidelli et al. (2012) for the origin of the Uranian system. In this model, a satellite system formed by co-accretion is destabilized by a giant impact that tilts the planet. The primordial satellites collide and disrupt, creating an outer debris disk that can re-orient to the planet's new equatorial plane and accrete into Uranus' 4 major satellites. The needed reorientation out to distances comparable to outermost Oberon requires that the impact creates an inner disk with $\ge 1\%$ of Uranus' mass. We here simulate giant impacts that appropriately tilt the planet and leave the system with an angular momentum comparable to that of the current system. We find that such impacts do not produce inner debris disks massive enough to realign the outer debris disk to the post-impact equatorial plane. Although our results are inconsistent with the apparent requirements of a co-accretion + giant impact model, we suggest alternatives that merit further exploration.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Accretion of Uranus and Neptune: confronting different giant impact scenarios
Both the equal-mass-embryo scenario and the high-mass-ratio impact scenario form Uranus and Neptune analogues with comparable low probability (~0.1-1%), so neither is dynamically preferred.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.