Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Probing massive neutrinos and modified gravity with redshift-space morphologies and anisotropies of large-scale structure

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the 3D scalar and tensor Minkowski functionals of the redshift-space density field carry non-Gaussian and velocity information that breaks the f(R)-gravity versus neutrino-mass degeneracy, improving Fisher-forecast…

desk verdict Careful Fisher forecast showing Minkowski statistics tighten MG+neutrino constraints; headline improvements plausible but the M_nu and sigma_8 factors are not fully converged. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05662 v2 pith:CMRUBWGI submitted 2024-12-07 astro-ph.CO

Wei Liu , Liang Wu , Francisco Villaescusa-Navarro , Marco Baldi , Georgios Valogiannis , Wenjuan Fang This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.CO
keywords large-scalestructureMinkowskifunctionalstensorsredshift-spacedistortionsmassiveneutrinosmodifiedgravityf(R)Fisherforecast
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper is a forecasting study about whether the morphology of the cosmic web in redshift space can separate the growth-enhancing effects of $f(R)$ modified gravity from the growth-suppressing effects of massive neutrinos, two ingredients that are strongly degenerate in standard statistics like the power spectrum and halo counts. The authors claim that the non-Gaussian information captured by the scalar Minkowski functionals and the anisotropic, velocity-sensitive information captured by the tensor Minkowski functionals break this degeneracy. On simulation-based Fisher forecasts, adding these morphological statistics to the power-spectrum multipoles tightens the constraints on $\Omega_m$, $h$, $\sigma_8$, $M_\nu$, and $f_{R0}$ by factors of 3.4, 3.0, 3.3, 3.3, and 1.9 on small scales, and 2.8, 2.2, 3.4, 3.4, and 1.5 on large scales. If correct, the result matters because it identifies a relatively untapped source of non-Gaussian and velocity information that could help Stage-IV surveys jointly measure neutrino mass and test gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the redshift-space morphological data vector: the four scalar Minkowski functionals (volume, surface area, integrated mean curvature, and Euler characteristic) together with the two translation-invariant rank-2 Minkowski tensors $W^{0,2}_1$ and $W^{0,2}_2$, computed on isodensity surfaces of the density field smoothed with a Gaussian filter of radius $R_G=5$ or $10\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$. The tensors are split into perpendicular and parallel components relative to the line of sight; these components separately encode the anisotropies produced by the Kaiser effect and the Fingers-of-God effect, which is how velocity information enters. The forecast itself is carried by a combined Fisher estimator, the geometric mean of the standard and compressed estimators, chosen to avoid the noise-tightening bias that simulation-derived derivatives can introduce.

What would settle it

Recompute the neutrino-mass derivative with a smaller step or central difference (for example using the $M_\nu=0.2$ and $0.4$ eV runs against the fiducial) and repeat the combined-estimator Fisher forecast for $P_{0,2,4}+$MFs+MTs; if the claimed $\sim3.3$-fold improvement on $M_\nu$ does not survive, the headline result is dominated by derivative noise, which the paper's own Appendix B shows still produces more than 10% fluctuations on the large-scale $M_\nu$ and $\sigma_8$ constraints.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the 3D scalar Minkowski functionals and rank-2 tensor Minkowski functionals, measured on the redshift-space CDM density field, contain non-Gaussian and anisotropic information that breaks the degeneracy between $f(R)$ modified gravity and massive neutrinos. The authors find distinct imprints of $f_{R0}$ and $M_\nu$ in these statistics, particularly at low density thresholds, and show that the perpendicular and parallel components of the Minkowski tensors respond differently to the Kaiser and Fingers-of-God regimes of redshift-space distortion. In a combined-estimator Fisher forecast, adding the Minkowski statistics to the monopole, quadrupole, and hexadecapole of the power spectrum improves the marginalized constraints on $\Omega_m$, $h$, $\sigma_8$, $M_\nu$, and $|f_{R0}|_{\mathrm{lg}2}$ by factors of 3.4, 3.0, 3.3, 3.3, and 1.9 on small scales ($k_{\max}=0.5\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, $R_G=5\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$) and 2.8, 2.2, 3.4, 3.4, and 1.5 on large scales ($k_{\max}=0.25\,h\,\mathrm{Mpc}^{-1}$, $R_G=10\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$). This is presented as the first application of 3D Minkowski tensors on fully nonlinear scales.

Load-bearing premise

The whole forecast rests on the assumption that the simulation-estimated derivatives and covariance matrix approximate the true likelihood well enough that numerical noise does not tighten the Fisher errors; the neutrino-mass derivative in particular is a secant between $M_\nu=0$ and $0.4$ eV from simulations with Zel'dovich initial conditions, and the paper's own Appendix B shows more than 10% fluctuations on the large-scale $M_\nu$ and $\sigma_8$ constraints even with all 500 derivative simulations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the forecast is right, the power-spectrum multipole constraints on $\Omega_m$, $h$, $\sigma_8$, and $M_\nu$ improve by factors of roughly 2 to 3.4 when Minkowski functionals and tensors are added, on both quasi-linear and nonlinear scales.
  • The $|f_{R0}|$--$M_\nu$ degeneracy, which appears in the power spectrum, halo mass function, and halo bias, is reduced by the morphological statistics; the $f(R)$ parameter itself improves by factors of 1.9 on small scales and 1.5 on large scales.
  • The perpendicular and parallel elements of the Minkowski tensors carry complementary information, and low-density thresholds (voids) are particularly sensitive to $f_{R0}$ because the environment-dependent screening of the fifth force is weaker there.
  • The analysis implies that non-Gaussian and velocity information are effectively complementary to two-point statistics, motivating further development of efficient morphological estimators for galaxy surveys; grid-based Minkowski functionals give nearly identical constraints at more than 700 times lower computational cost.
  • The same statistics could be extended to smaller smoothing scales or to higher-rank Minkowski tensors to capture additional anisotropic information, though the paper notes that the computational cost of tensor measurements is currently limiting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The improvements reported here are for the dark-matter field; for galaxy catalogs the gains may shrink, since bias and shot noise dilute the non-Gaussian signal and the authors note that Fisher forecasts for biased tracers face convergence problems.
  • Because the paper treats $R_G=5$ and $10\,h^{-1}\mathrm{Mpc}$ separately, a multi-scale combination across both smoothing scales would likely tighten constraints further than either scale alone.
  • The same machinery should generalize to other modified-gravity models or to higher-rank Minkowski tensors, which the authors suggest could capture more of the anisotropic information; those extensions are untested here.
  • A practical consequence: the grid-based Minkowski functional measurement is fast enough for survey-scale analyses, so the expensive tensor measurement may be targeted only where its perpendicular-parallel anisotropy pays off.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper forecasts cosmological constraints from redshift-space power spectrum multipoles (P0, P2, P4), 3D scalar Minkowski functionals (MFs), and tensor Minkowski functionals (MTs) using the Quijote and Quijote-MG simulations. The authors measure derivatives and covariance from 500 and 5000 realizations, respectively, use a combined Fisher estimator, and report that adding MFs+MTs improves P0,2,4 constraints on Omega_m, h, sigma_8, M_nu, and |f_R0| by factors of 3.4, 3.0, 3.3, 3.3, and 1.9 on small scales (kmax=0.5 h/Mpc, RG=5 h^-1 Mpc) and 2.8, 2.2, 3.4, 3.4, and 1.5 on large scales (kmax=0.25 h/Mpc, RG=10 h^-1 Mpc). The paper also analyzes the information in perpendicular and parallel MT components and in low- versus high-density thresholds, finding complementary information. The analysis includes extensive convergence tests, Gaussianity checks, and a more conservative forecast in the appendices.

Significance. If the headline improvements are robust, this work establishes Minkowski tensors as a valuable addition to the cosmological probe toolbox for breaking the f(R)-massive-neutrino degeneracy using non-Gaussian and anisotropic information. The analysis is notably careful: covariance from 5000 fiducial simulations with Hartlap debiasing, a combined standard/compressed Fisher estimator to mitigate derivative noise, likelihood Gaussianity checks, and convergence tests with respect to both derivative and covariance noise. The physical interpretation of the perpendicular/parallel MT elements and the low- versus high-density threshold separation is a strength. The main caveat is that the MT constraints on M_nu and sigma_8 are not fully converged at the 10% level, which directly affects the headline improvement factors for those parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, Fig. 15, and Table 3] The headline improvement factors for M_nu and sigma_8 (3.3–3.4 on both small and large scales) rest on the combined Fisher estimator whose convergence is not established for these parameters. In Figure 15, for the MTs on large scales (kmax=0.25 h/Mpc, RG=10 h^-1 Mpc), sigma_theta(Nderi)/sigma_theta(Nderi=500) fluctuates by more than 10% for M_nu and sigma_8 even when Nderi approaches 500, and the authors state that 'a large number of simulations would be required for these constraints to converge below the 5% level.' Since the power-spectrum constraints are well converged, the quoted ratios are a converged quantity divided by a non-converged one; a 10% fluctuation in the denominator can plausibly shift the headline ratios by 15–20%, and if the fluctuation reflects bias rather than sampling noise, the improvement would be systematically overestimated. The paper should provide more converged forecasts for M_nu and sigma_8 (e.g., with more realizations or a different derivative estimator) before claiming these factors.
  2. [Eq. 4.8 and Section 2] The M_nu derivative is estimated as a two-point secant between M_nu=0 and M_nu=0.4 eV using Zel'dovich ICs, and the paper argues that IC differences cancel in derivatives. However, this cancellation is only tested for the MFs (Figure 2), not for the MTs, which are exactly the statistics exhibiting the worst non-convergence. The assumption that the MT derivatives are unbiased is load-bearing for the M_nu forecasts. A concrete test would be to compute the M_nu derivative with 2LPT ICs for the fiducial and M_nu=0.4 eV models, or to use a smaller step with more realizations, and compare the resulting Fisher forecasts.
  3. [Abstract and Appendix B] The abstract reports constraints on five parameters (Omega_m, h, sigma_8, M_nu, f_R0), but the analysis fixes Omega_b and n_s in the main forecast (Appendix B, Figure 11 and surrounding text). The headline improvement factors are therefore not marginalized over the full cosmological parameter set. The paper should either state this restriction explicitly in the abstract or extend the forecast to include Omega_b and n_s, because degeneracies with these parameters could weaken the claimed improvements, as the paper itself notes in Section 6 when comparing with [79].
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 4.1] The transformation from f_R0 to |f_R0|lg2 is not clearly defined; the listed mapping from f_R0 = 0, -5e-7, -5e-6, -5e-5, -5e-4 to 0, 0.0127, 0.0254, 0.0507, 0.101 does not correspond to a standard logarithmic base-10 or base-2 transformation. Please clarify the exact definition.
  2. [Captions of Figures 12 and 15] In the captions, the MT data vector is repeatedly written as 'W0 + W^{0,2}_1 + W^{0,2}_1 + W3'; the second term should be W^{0,2}_2.
  3. [Section 5.3] The statement that Omega_b and n_s are fixed appears only in Appendix B; please reiterate this restriction in Section 5.3 or the abstract so that readers do not misinterpret the marginalized constraints as being over the full seven-parameter space.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the claimed constraint improvements are computed from simulation-based derivatives and a fiducial covariance matrix, not from fitting or self-referential construction.

full rationale

The paper's headline claim, that combining power-spectrum multipoles with Minkowski functionals and tensors improves constraints on Omega_m, h, sigma_8, M_nu, and f_R0, is obtained through a standard Fisher-matrix calculation (Eqs. 4.1–4.5) using numerical derivatives of the summary statistics (Eqs. 4.6–4.8) and a covariance matrix estimated from 5000 fiducial Quijote simulations (Eq. 4.9, Section 4.2). The improvement factors in Table 3 are ratios of marginalized errors obtained by inverting the combined Fisher matrix; no parameter is fitted to the target result, and no statistic is defined in terms of the quantities it is used to predict. The Minkowski functionals and tensors are measured from simulation density fields with independent algorithms (Section 3.2), and the earlier work by the same authors [48, 49] is used for methodological continuity such as threshold binning, not as an unverified premise that forces the conclusion. The self-citations therefore are not load-bearing in a circular sense. The paper's own Appendices B and C document genuine robustness caveats: the combined-estimator constraints on M_nu and sigma_8 from the Minkowski tensors fluctuate by more than 10% on large scales even with Nderi near 500, and the fR0 derivative estimator fR03a used for the main results may slightly overestimate the improvement in constraining power. These are convergence and estimator-bias concerns that affect the reliability of the quoted factors, but they do not make the derivation circular: the forecasts remain independent computations from simulation outputs. No step in the paper reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No physical constants are fitted; the free parameters listed are analysis hyperparameters that set the smoothing, scale cuts, and derivative step. The axioms are the standard morphological theorem plus domain assumptions about simulation fidelity, likelihood, and RSD geometry. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Smoothing scale RG = 5 and 10 h^-1 Mpc
    Hand-selected in Section 3.2; RG=5 is the smallest scale where the contour algorithm is accurate and RG=10 probes quasi-linear scales. Results are conditional on these choices.
  • Power spectrum cutoff kmax = 0.25 and 0.5 h/Mpc
    Hand-selected in Section 3.1 to stay within simulation resolution; these values set the small/large scale split of the forecast.
  • Mnu derivative step = 0.4 eV
    Eq. 4.8 estimates d/dMnu as a secant from 0 to 0.4 eV to reduce derivative noise; this is an analysis choice that affects the Mnu constraint.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Hadwiger's theorem: any additive, motion-invariant, conditionally continuous functional on a body is a linear combination of the Minkowski functionals.
    Invoked in Section 1 to justify MFs as complete morphological descriptors of the density field.
  • domain assumption The likelihood of the data vector is Gaussian and the covariance matrix is parameter-independent.
    Assumed for the Fisher formalism in Section 4 and tested only at the fiducial model in Appendix A.
  • domain assumption The N-body codes GADGET-III and MG-GADGET accurately simulate Hu-Sawicki f(R) gravity and massive neutrinos at the stated resolution.
    The whole analysis rests on the fidelity of the Quijote and Quijote-MG simulations described in Section 2.
  • ad hoc to paper The Mnu derivative can be estimated as a secant between Mnu=0 and Mnu=0.4 eV using Zeldovich-IC simulations, and IC differences cancel in derivatives.
    Eq. 4.8 defines the derivative this way to reduce noise; Appendix B shows convergence is not fully achieved for Mnu and sigma_8 from MTs on large scales.
  • domain assumption The plane-parallel redshift-space distortion approximation with a single line of sight is adequate for the statistics used.
    Applied in Eq. 3.1; Section 6 acknowledges wide-angle and survey geometry effects are left to future work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing massive neutrinos and modified gravity with redshift-space morphologies and anisotropies of large-scale structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CMRUBWGI

@misc{pith2026241205662,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing massive neutrinos and modified gravity with redshift-space morphologies and anisotropies of large-scale structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CMRUBWGI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05662}
}
abstract

Strong degeneracy exists between some modified gravity (MG) models and massive neutrinos because the enhanced structure growth produced by modified gravity can be suppressed due to the free-streaming massive neutrinos. Previous works showed this degeneracy can be broken with non-Gaussian or velocity information. Therefore in this work, we focus on the large-scale structure (LSS) in redshift space and investigate for the first time the possibility of using the non-Gaussian information and velocity information captured by the 3D scalar Minkowski functionals (MFs) and the 3D Minkowski tensors (MTs) to break this degeneracy. Based on the Quijote and Quijote-MG simulations, we find the imprints on redshift space LSS left by the Hu-Sawicki $f(R)$ gravity can be discriminated from those left by massive neutrinos with these statistics. With the Fisher information formalism, we first show how the MTs extract information with their perpendicular and parallel elements for both low- and high-density regions; then we compare constraints from the power spectrum monopole and MFs in real space with those in redshift space, and investigate how the constraining power is further improved with anisotropies captured by the quadrupole and hexadecapole of the power spectrum and the MTs; finally, we combine the power spectrum multipoles with MFs plus MTs and find the constraints from the power spectrum multipoles on $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}}, h, \sigma_8$, $M_\nu$, and $f_{R_0}$ can be improved, because they are complemented with non-Gaussian information, by a factor of 3.4, 3.0, 3.3, 3.3, and 1.9 on small scales ($k_{\rm{max}}=0.5~h\rm{Mpc}^{-1},\ R_G=5~h^{-1}\rm{Mpc}$), and 2.8, 2.2, 3.4, 3.4, and 1.5 on large scales ($k_{\rm{max}}=0.25~h\rm{Mpc}^{-1},\ R_G=10~h^{-1}\rm{Mpc}$).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Cosmological constraints from the Minkowski functionals of the BOSS CMASS galaxy sample

    astro-ph.CO 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A simulation-based emulator of Minkowski functionals applied to BOSS CMASS galaxies yields cosmological constraints from both Gaussian and non-Gaussian information, tighter than the 2PCF alone.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [79]

    Valogiannis, F

    G. Valogiannis, F. Villaescusa-Navarro and M. Baldi,Towards unveiling the large-scale nature of gravity with the wavelet scattering transform, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2407.18647 [2407.18647]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    D. N. Spergel, L. Verde, H. V. Peiris, E. Komatsu, M. R. Nolta, C. L. Bennett et al., First-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Determination of Cosmological Parameters, ApJS 148 (2003) 175 [astro-ph/0302209]

    arXiv 2003

  3. [2]

    Hinshaw, D

    G. Hinshaw, D. Larson, E. Komatsu, D. N. Spergel, C. L. Bennett, J. Dunkley et al., Nine-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results, ApJS 208 (2013) 19 [1212.5226]

    arXiv 2013

  4. [3]

    Aghanim, Y

    Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, A&A 641 (2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [4]

    S. Alam, M. Aubert, S. Avila, C. Balland, J. E. Bautista, M. A. Bershady et al.,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 083533 [2007.08991]

    arXiv 2021

  6. [5]

    T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, A. Alarcon, S. Allam, O. Alves, A. Amon et al.,Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing, Phys. Rev. D105 (2022) 023520 [2105.13549]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [6]

    Ishak, J

    M. Ishak, J. Pan, R. Calderon, K. Lodha, G. Valogiannis, A. Aviles et al.,Modified Gravity Constraints from the Full Shape Modeling of Clustering Measurements from DESI 2024, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2411.12026 [2411.12026]

    arXiv 2024

  8. [7]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part I: Science,Targeting, and Survey Design, arXiv e-prints (2016) arXiv:1611.00036 [1611.00036]

    arXiv 2016

Show all 109 references
  1. [8]

    Hu and I

    W. Hu and I. Sawicki,Models of f(R) cosmic acceleration that evade solar system tests, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 064004 [0705.1158]. – 39 –

    2007 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Lesgourgues and S

    J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor,Massive neutrinos and cosmology, Phys. Rep.429 (2006) 307 [astro-ph/0603494]

    2006 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Y. Y. Y. Wong,Neutrino Mass in Cosmology: Status and Prospects, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science61 (2011) 69 [1111.1436]

    2011 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Marulli, C

    F. Marulli, C. Carbone, M. Viel, L. Moscardini and A. Cimatti,Effects of massive neutrinos on the large-scale structure of the Universe, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 418 (2011) 346 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/418/1/346/2839351/mnras0418-0346.pdf]

    2011

  5. [12]

    Super-Kamiokande Collaboration collaboration, Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81 (1998) 1562

    1998

  6. [13]

    SNO Collaboration collaboration, Direct evidence for neutrino flavor transformation from neutral-current interactions in the sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett.89 (2002) 011301

    2002

  7. [14]

    KamLAND Collaboration collaboration, Measurement of neutrino oscillation with kamland: Evidence of spectral distortion, Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 081801

    2005

  8. [15]

    MINOS Collaboration collaboration, Measurement of neutrino oscillations with the minos detectors in the numi beam, Phys. Rev. Lett.101 (2008) 131802

    2008

  9. [16]

    He,Weighing neutrinos inf (r) gravity, Phys

    J.-h. He,Weighing neutrinos inf (r) gravity, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 103523

    2013

  10. [17]

    Motohashi, A

    H. Motohashi, A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama,Cosmology based onf (r) gravity admits 1 ev sterile neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.110 (2013) 121302

    2013

  11. [18]

    Baldi, F

    M. Baldi, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, M. Viel, E. Puchwein, V. Springel and L. Moscardini, Cosmic degeneracies – I. Joint N-body simulations of modified gravity and massive neutrinos, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society440 (2014) 75 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/ar...

    2014

  12. [19]

    Hagstotz, M

    S. Hagstotz, M. Costanzi, M. Baldi and J. Weller,Joint halo-mass function for modified gravity and massive neutrinos - I. Simulations and cosmological forecasts, MNRAS 486 (2019) 3927 [1806.07400]

    2019 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Giocoli, M

    C. Giocoli, M. Baldi and L. Moscardini,Weak lensing light-cones in modified gravity simulations with and without massive neutrinos, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 481 (2018) 2813 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/481/2/2813/25813034/sty2465.pdf]

    2018

  14. [21]

    A. Peel, V. Pettorino, C. Giocoli, J.-L. Starck and M. Baldi,Breaking degeneracies in modified gravity with higher (than 2nd) order weak-lensing statistics, A&A 619 (2018) A38 [1805.05146]

    2018 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Contarini, F

    S. Contarini, F. Marulli, L. Moscardini, A. Veropalumbo, C. Giocoli and M. Baldi,Cosmic voids in modified gravity models with massive neutrinos, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 504 (2021) 5021 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/504/4/5021/37951986/st...

    2021

  16. [23]

    Lee and M

    J. Lee and M. Baldi,Combined effects of f(r) gravity and massive neutrinos on the turnaround radii of dark matter halos, The Astrophysical Journal938 (2022) 137

    2022

  17. [24]

    J. Lee, S. Ryu and M. Baldi,Disentangling modified gravity and massive neutrinos with intrinsic shape alignments of massive halos, The Astrophysical Journal945 (2023) 15

    2023

  18. [25]

    S. Ryu, J. Lee and M. Baldi,Breaking the Dark Degeneracy with the Drifting Coefficient of the Field Cluster Mass Function, ApJ 904 (2020) 93 [2008.12212]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [26]

    A. J. S. Hamilton,Linear Redshift Distortions: a Review, inThe Evolving Universe, – 40 – D. Hamilton, ed., vol. 231 ofAstrophysics and Space Science Library, p. 185, Jan., 1998, astro-ph/9708102, DOI

    1998 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Hagstotz, M

    S. Hagstotz, M. Gronke, D. F. Mota and M. Baldi,Breaking cosmic degeneracies: Disentangling neutrinos and modified gravity with kinematic information, A&A 629 (2019) A46 [1902.01868]

    2019 arXiv

  21. [28]

    J. E. García-Farieta, F. Marulli, A. Veropalumbo, L. Moscardini, R. A. Casas-Miranda, C. Giocoli et al.,Clustering and redshift-space distortions in modified gravity models with massive neutrinos, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society488 (2019) 1987 [https://academ...

    2019

  22. [29]

    B. S. Wright, K. Koyama, H. A. Winther and G.-B. Zhao,Investigating the degeneracy between modified gravity and massive neutrinos with redshift-space distortions, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2019 (2019) 040

    2019

  23. [30]

    K. R. Mecke, T. Buchert and H. Wagner,Robust morphological measures for large-scale structure in the Universe, A&A 288 (1994) 697 [astro-ph/9312028]

    1994 arXiv

  24. [31]

    G. E. Schröder-Turk, W. Mickel, S. C. Kapfer, M. A. Klatt, F. M. Schaller, M. J. Hoffmann et al.,Minkowski tensor shape analysis of cellular, granular and porous structures, Advanced Materials 23 (2011) 2535

    2011

  25. [32]

    G. E. Schröder-Turk, W. Mickel, S. C. Kapfer, F. M. Schaller, B. Breidenbach, D. Hug et al., Minkowski tensors of anisotropic spatial structure, New Journal of Physics15 (2013) 083028 [1009.2340]

    2013 arXiv

  26. [33]

    Hadwiger,Vorlesungen Über Inhalt, Oberfläche und Isoperimetrie

    H. Hadwiger,Vorlesungen Über Inhalt, Oberfläche und Isoperimetrie. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1957, 10.1007/978-3-642-94702-5

    1957 doi

  27. [34]

    Schmalzing, S

    J. Schmalzing, S. Gottlöber, A. A. Klypin and A. V. Kravtsov,Quantifying the evolution of higher order clustering, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society309 (1999) 1007 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/309/4/1007/3785859/309-4-1007.pdf]

    1999

  28. [35]

    Pratten and D

    G. Pratten and D. Munshi,Non-Gaussianity in large-scale structure and Minkowski functionals, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society423 (2012) 3209 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/423/4/3209/4885960/mnras0423-3209.pdf]

    2012

  29. [36]

    Codis, C

    S. Codis, C. Pichon, D. Pogosyan, F. Bernardeau and T. Matsubara,Non-Gaussian Minkowski functionals and extrema counts in redshift space, MNRAS 435 (2013) 531 [1305.7402]

    2013 arXiv

  30. [37]

    Hikage, E

    C. Hikage, E. Komatsu and T. Matsubara,Primordial Non-Gaussianity and Analytical Formula for Minkowski Functionals of the Cosmic Microwave Background and Large-Scale Structure, ApJ 653 (2006) 11 [astro-ph/0607284]

    2006 arXiv

  31. [38]

    W. Fang, A. Becker, D. Huterer and E. A. Lim,Joint Minkowski functionals and bispectrum constraints on non-Gaussianity in the cosmic microwave background, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 041302 [1303.4381]

    2013 arXiv

  32. [39]

    W. Fang, B. Li and G.-B. Zhao,New Probe of Departures from General Relativity Using Minkowski Functionals, Phys. Rev. Lett.118 (2017) 181301 [1704.02325]

    2017 arXiv

  33. [40]

    Shirasaki, T

    M. Shirasaki, T. Nishimichi, B. Li and Y. Higuchi,The imprint of f(R) gravity on weak gravitational lensing - II. Information content in cosmic shear statistics, MNRAS 466 (2017) 2402 [1610.03600]

    2017 arXiv

  34. [41]

    Gleser, A

    L. Gleser, A. Nusser, B. Ciardi and V. Desjacques,The morphology of cosmological reionization by means of Minkowski functionals, MNRAS 370 (2006) 1329 [astro-ph/0602616]

    2006 arXiv

  35. [42]

    Z. Chen, Y. Xu, Y. Wang and X. Chen,Stages of Reionization as Revealed by the Minkowski Functionals, ApJ 885 (2019) 23 [1812.10333]. – 41 –

    2019 arXiv

  36. [43]

    J. Sato, M. Takada, Y. P. Jing and T. Futamase,Implication of ΩM through the Morphological Analysis of Weak Lensing Fields, ApJ 551 (2001) L5 [astro-ph/0104015]

    2001 arXiv

  37. [44]

    Beisbart, R

    C. Beisbart, R. Valdarnini and T. Buchert,The morphological and dynamical evolution of simulated galaxy clusters, A&A 379 (2001) 412 [astro-ph/0109459]

    2001 arXiv

  38. [45]

    J. M. Kratochvil, E. A. Lim, S. Wang, Z. Haiman, M. May and K. Huffenberger,Probing cosmology with weak lensing Minkowski functionals, Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 103513 [1109.6334]

    2012 arXiv

  39. [46]

    C. Park, J. Kim and I. Gott, J. Richard,Effects of Gravitational Evolution, Biasing, and Redshift Space Distortion on Topology, ApJ 633 (2005) 1 [astro-ph/0503584]

    2005 arXiv

  40. [47]

    Jiang, W

    A. Jiang, W. Liu, B. Li, C. Barrera-Hinojosa, Y. Zhang and W. Fang,Minkowski Functionals of Large-Scale Structure as a Probe of Modified Gravity, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2305.04520 [2305.04520]

    2023 arXiv

  41. [48]

    W. Liu, A. Jiang and W. Fang,Probing massive neutrinos with the Minkowski functionals of large-scale structure, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2022 (2022) 045 [2204.02945]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [49]

    W. Liu, A. Jiang and W. Fang,Probing massive neutrinos with the Minkowski functionals of the galaxy distribution, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2023 (2023) 037 [2302.08162]

    2023 arXiv

  43. [50]

    Matsubara,Statistics of Isodensity Contours in Redshift Space, ApJ 457 (1996) 13 [astro-ph/9501055]

    T. Matsubara,Statistics of Isodensity Contours in Redshift Space, ApJ 457 (1996) 13 [astro-ph/9501055]

    1996 arXiv

  44. [51]

    Appleby, P

    S. Appleby, P. Chingangbam, C. Park, K. P. Yogendran and P. K. Joby,Minkowski Tensors in Three Dimensions: Probing the Anisotropy Generated by Redshift Space Distortion, ApJ 863 (2018) 200 [1805.08752]

    2018 arXiv

  45. [52]

    Appleby, J

    S. Appleby, J. P. Kochappan, P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Ensemble Average of Three-dimensional Minkowski Tensors of a Gaussian Random Field in Redshift Space, ApJ 887 (2019) 128 [1908.02440]

    2019 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Appleby, J

    S. Appleby, J. P. Kochappan, P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Minkowski Tensors in Redshift Space – Beyond the Plane Parallel Approximation, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2208.10164 [2208.10164]

    2022 arXiv

  47. [54]

    M. H. Jalali Kanafi and S. M. S. Movahed,Probing the anisotropy and non-Gaussianity in redshift space through the derivative of excursion set moments, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2308.03086 [2308.03086]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [55]

    Villaescusa-Navarro, C

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, C. Hahn, E. Massara, A. Banerjee, A. M. Delgado, D. K. Ramanah et al.,The Quijote Simulations, ApJS 250 (2020) 2 [1909.05273]

    2020 arXiv

  49. [56]

    Baldi and F

    M. Baldi and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,The Quijote-MG Simulations, in preparation(2024)

    2024

  50. [57]

    V. Springel,The cosmological simulation code gadget-2, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 364 (2005) 1105 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/364/4/1105/18657201/364-4-1105.pdf]

    2005

  51. [58]

    Puchwein, M

    E. Puchwein, M. Baldi and V. Springel,Modified-Gravity-GADGET: a new code for cosmological hydrodynamical simulations of modified gravity models, MNRAS 436 (2013) 348 [1305.2418]

    2013 arXiv

  52. [59]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa,f(r) theories, Living Reviews in Relativity13 (2010) 3

    2010

  53. [60]

    Khoury and A

    J. Khoury and A. Weltman,Chameleon fields: Awaiting surprises for tests of gravity in space, Phys. Rev. Lett.93 (2004) 171104

    2004

  54. [61]

    Li, G.-B

    B. Li, G.-B. Zhao and K. Koyama,Haloes and voids in f(R) gravity, MNRAS 421 (2012) 3481 [1111.2602]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [62]

    G.-B. Zhao, B. Li and K. Koyama,Testing Gravity Using the Environmental Dependence of Dark Matter Halos, Phys. Rev. Lett.107 (2011) 071303 [1105.0922]. – 42 –

    2011 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Jennings, C

    E. Jennings, C. M. Baugh, B. Li, G.-B. Zhao and K. Koyama,Redshift space distortions in f(R) gravity, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.425 (2012) 2128 [1205.2698]

    2012 arXiv

  57. [64]

    Scoccimarro, H

    R. Scoccimarro, H. M. P. Couchman and J. A. Frieman,The Bispectrum as a Signature of Gravitational Instability in Redshift Space, ApJ 517 (1999) 531 [astro-ph/9808305]

    1999 arXiv

  58. [65]

    Wilson and R

    C. Wilson and R. bean,Fisher’s Mirage: Noise Tightening of Cosmological Constraints in Simulation-Based Inference, arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2406.06067 [2406.06067]

    2024 arXiv

  59. [66]

    Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities, Phys

    R. Scoccimarro,Redshift-space distortions, pairwise velocities, and nonlinearities, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 083007

    2004

  60. [67]

    Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro, “Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1811.008, Nov., 2018

    2018

  61. [68]

    Jiang, W

    A. Jiang, W. Liu, W. Fang and W. Zhao,The effects of peculiar velocities on the morphological properties of large scale structures, arXiv e-prints (2021) arXiv:2108.03851 [2108.03851]

    2021 arXiv

  62. [69]

    J. C. Jackson,A critique of Rees’s theory of primordial gravitational radiation, MNRAS 156 (1972) 1P [0810.3908]

    1972 arXiv

  63. [70]

    Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS 227 (1987) 1

    N. Kaiser,Clustering in real space and in redshift space, MNRAS 227 (1987) 1

    1987

  64. [71]

    Villaescusa-Navarro,Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,

    F. Villaescusa-Navarro,Pylians: Python libraries for the analysis of numerical simulations,

  65. [72]

    C. M. Correa et al.,Redshift-space effects in voids and their impact on cosmological tests. Part I: the void size function, MNRAS 500 (2021) 911 [2007.12064]

    2021 arXiv

  66. [73]

    Shoji and J

    M. Shoji and J. Lee,Voids in Redshift Space, arXiv e-prints (2012) arXiv:1203.0869 [1203.0869]

    2012 arXiv

  67. [74]

    R. A. Fisher,The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems, Annals of eugenics7 (1936) 179

    1936

  68. [75]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. N. Taylor and A. F. Heavens,Karhunen-loeve eigenvalue problems in cosmology: How should we tackle large data sets?, The Astrophysical Journal480 (1997) 22

    1997

  69. [76]

    Carron,On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices, A&A 551 (2013) A88 [1204.4724]

    J. Carron,On the assumption of Gaussianity for cosmological two-point statistics and parameter dependent covariance matrices, A&A 551 (2013) A88 [1204.4724]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [77]

    Alsing and B

    J. Alsing and B. Wandelt,Generalized massive optimal data compression, MNRAS 476 (2018) L60 [1712.00012]

    2018 arXiv

  71. [78]

    W. R. Coulton and B. D. Wandelt,How to estimate Fisher information matrices from simulations, arXiv e-prints (2023) arXiv:2305.08994 [2305.08994]

    2023 arXiv

  72. [80]

    C. F. Park, E. Allys, F. Villaescusa-Navarro and D. P. Finkbeiner,Quantification of high dimensional non-Gaussianities and its implication to Fisher analysis in cosmology, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2204.05435 [2204.05435]

    2022 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Massara, F

    E. Massara, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, S. Ho, N. Dalal and D. N. Spergel,Using the Marked Power Spectrum to Detect the Signature of Neutrinos in Large-Scale Structure, Phys. Rev. Lett.126 (2021) 011301 [2001.11024]

    2021 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Valogiannis and C

    G. Valogiannis and C. Dvorkin,Towards an Optimal Estimation of Cosmological Parameters with the Wavelet Scattering Transform, arXiv e-prints (2021) arXiv:2108.07821 [2108.07821]

    2021 arXiv

  75. [83]

    A. E. Bayer, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Massara, J. Liu, D. N. Spergel, L. Verde et al., Detecting Neutrino Mass by Combining Matter Clustering, Halos, and Voids, ApJ 919 (2021) 24 [2102.05049]. – 43 –

    2021 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Hartlap, P

    J. Hartlap, P. Simon and P. Schneider,Why your model parameter confidences might be too optimistic. unbiased estimation of the inverse covariance matrix, Astronomy & Astrophysics 464 (2007) 399

    2007

  77. [85]

    Bhandari, C

    N. Bhandari, C. D. Leonard, M. M. Rau and R. Mandelbaum,Fisher Matrix Stability, arXiv e-prints (2021) arXiv:2101.00298 [2101.00298]

    2021 arXiv

  78. [86]

    C. Hahn, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, E. Castorina and R. Scoccimarro,Constraining Mν with the bispectrum. Part I. Breaking parameter degeneracies, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2020 (2020) 040 [1909.11107]

    2020 arXiv

  79. [87]

    W. R. Coulton, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Jamieson, M. Baldi, G. Jung, D. Karagiannis et al.,Quijote-PNG: Simulations of primordial non-Gaussianity and the information content of the matter field power spectrum and bispectrum, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2206.01619 [2206.01619]

    2022 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Tonegawa, C

    M. Tonegawa, C. Park, Y. Zheng, H. Park, S. E. Hong, H. S. Hwang et al.,Cosmological Information from the Small-scale Redshift-space Distortion, ApJ 897 (2020) 17 [2005.12159]

    2020 arXiv

  81. [89]

    Paillas, Y.-C

    E. Paillas, Y.-C. Cai, N. Padilla and A. G. Sánchez,Redshift-space distortions with split densities, MNRAS 505 (2021) 5731 [2101.09854]

    2021 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Valogiannis and R

    G. Valogiannis and R. Bean,Beyond δ : Tailoring marked statistics to reveal modified gravity, Phys. Rev. D97 (2018) 023535 [1708.05652]

    2018 arXiv

  83. [91]

    S. Shao, B. Li, M. Cautun, H. Wang and J. Wang,Screening maps of the local universe i – methodology, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society489 (2019) 4912–4925

    2019

  84. [92]

    Massara, F

    E. Massara, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, M. Viel and P. Sutter,Voids in massive neutrino cosmologies, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2015 (2015) 018–018

    2015

  85. [93]

    C. D. Kreisch, A. Pisani, C. Carbone, J. Liu, A. J. Hawken, E. Massara et al.,Massive neutrinos leave fingerprints on cosmic voids, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488 (2019) 4413–4426

    2019

  86. [94]

    M. A. Klatt, M. Hörmann and K. Mecke,Characterization of anisotropic Gaussian random fields by Minkowski tensors, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2022 (2022) 043301 [2111.13349]

    2022 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Mauland, Ø

    R. Mauland, Ø. Elgarøy, D. F. Mota and H. A. Winther,The void-galaxy cross-correlation function with massive neutrinos and modified gravity, A&A 674 (2023) A185 [2303.05820]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    M. S. Vogeley, C. Park, M. J. Geller, J. P. Huchra and I. Gott, J. Richard,Topological Analysis of the CfA Redshift Survey, ApJ 420 (1994) 525

    1994

  89. [97]

    I. Gott, J. Richard, J. Miller, T. X. Thuan, S. E. Schneider, D. H. Weinberg, C. Gammie et al., The Topology of Large-Scale Structure. III. Analysis of Observations, ApJ 340 (1989) 625

    1989

  90. [98]

    Hikage, J

    C. Hikage, J. Schmalzing, T. Buchert, Y. Suto, I. Kayo, A. Taruya et al.,Minkowski functionals of sdss galaxies i: analysis of excursion sets, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan55 (2003) 911

    2003

  91. [99]

    Friedrich, F

    O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira, H. Camacho, O. Alves, R. Rosenfeld, J. Sanchez et al., Dark Energy Survey year 3 results: covariance modelling and its impact on parameter estimation and quality of fit, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society508 (2021) 3125 [https:...

    2021

  92. [100]

    Paillas, C

    E. Paillas, C. Cuesta-Lazaro, P. Zarrouk, Y.-C. Cai, W. J. Percival, S. Nadathur et al., Constraining νΛCDM with density-split clustering, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2209.04310 [2209.04310]. – 44 –

    2022 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Ajani, M

    Euclid Collaboration, V. Ajani, M. Baldi, A. Barthelemy, A. Boyle, P. Burger et al.,Euclid preparation. XXVIII. Forecasts for ten different higher-order weak lensing statistics, A&A 675 (2023) A120 [2301.12890]

    2023

  94. [102]

    Joachimi and S

    B. Joachimi and S. L. Bridle,Simultaneous measurement of cosmology and intrinsic alignments using joint cosmic shear and galaxy number density correlations, A&A 523 (2010) A1 [0911.2454]

    2010 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Bailoni, A

    A. Bailoni, A. Spurio Mancini and L. Amendola,Improving Fisher matrix forecasts for galaxy surveys: window function, bin cross-correlation and bin redshift uncertainty, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society470 (2017) 688 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/...

    2017

  96. [104]

    W. R. Coulton, F. Villaescusa-Navarro, D. Jamieson, M. Baldi, G. Jung, D. Karagiannis et al.,Quijote-PNG: The Information Content of the Halo Power Spectrum and Bispectrum, ApJ 943 (2023) 178 [2206.15450]

    2023 arXiv

  97. [105]

    Taylor, B

    A. Taylor, B. Joachimi and T. Kitching,Putting the precision in precision cosmology: How accurate should your data covariance matrix be?, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 432 (2013) 1928 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/432/3/1928/12612680/stt270.pdf]

    2013

  98. [106]

    Dodelson and M

    S. Dodelson and M. D. Schneider,The effect of covariance estimator error on cosmological parameter constraints, Phys. Rev. D88 (2013) 063537

    2013

  99. [107]

    Hahn and F

    C. Hahn and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,Constraining Mν with the bispectrum. Part II. The information content of the galaxy bispectrum monopole, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2021 (2021) 029 [2012.02200]

    2021 arXiv

  100. [108]

    J. Hou, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, C. Hahn and E. Massara,Cosmological Information in Skew Spectra of Biased Tracers in Redshift Space, arXiv e-prints (2022) arXiv:2210.12743 [2210.12743]

    2022 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Schmalzing and T

    J. Schmalzing and T. Buchert,Beyond Genus Statistics: A Unifying Approach to the Morphology of Cosmic Structure, ApJ 482 (1997) L1 [astro-ph/9702130]. – 45 –

    1997 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.