Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating different $\Lambda$ and $\bar\Lambda$ polarizations in relativistic heavy-ion collisions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1707.07262 v3 pith:CNOXUTUW submitted 2017-07-23 nucl-th hep-exnucl-ex

classification nucl-thhep-exnucl-ex
keywords lambdaspinfieldmagneticpolarizationscollisionsdifferentheavy-ion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Based on the chiral kinetic equations of motion, spin polarizations of various quarks, due to the magnetic field induced by spectator protons as well as the quark-antiquark vector interaction, are studied within a partonic transport approach. Although the magnetic field in QGP enhances the splitting of the spin polarizations of partons compared to the results under the magnetic field in vacuum, the spin polarizations of $s$ and $\bar s$ quarks are also sensitive to the quark-antiquark vector interaction, challenging that the different $\Lambda$ and $\bar \Lambda$ spin polarization is a good measure of the magnetic field in relativistic heavy-ion collisions. It is also found that there is no way to obtain the large splitting of the spin polarization between $\Lambda$ and $\bar \Lambda$ at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=7.7$ GeV with partonic dynamics.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Decade of Deep Learning: A Survey on The Magnificent Seven

    cs.LG 2024-12 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    This is a review of seven influential deep learning models that does not present new research results and suffers from methodological and integrity issues.

Pith tools