Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 86 references

QCD Sum Rule Analysis of Triply Heavy $(Q\bar{Q})(Q\bar{q})$ Tetraquark States with $J^P=0^{\pm}$

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read QCD sum rules predict four triply charmed tetraquark states at 4.76, 5.00, 5.04 and 5.37 GeV, with bottom counterparts near 14 GeV and the below-threshold states expected to be narrow.

desk verdict A careful, reproducible QCD-sum-rule survey whose three above-threshold charm predictions rest on a single-pole assumption that clashes with the paper's own claim that those same states have appreciable strong widths; the below-threshold charm state and bottom sector are safer. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.08385 v1 pith:D2VVJLLE submitted 2026-08-09 hep-ph hep-ex

Wen-Shuai Zhang , Chun-Gui Duan , Zhi-Hui Guo , Liang Tang This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-ex
keywords tetraquarkstatetriplyheavyQCDsumrulesexotichadronoperatorproductexpansioninterpolatingcurrentscharmoniumbottomonium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that tetraquark states containing a heavy quark-antiquark pair and a heavy-light pair, three heavy quarks in total, form a predictable spectrum with distinct, searchable states. Starting from 18 interpolating currents spanning two color structures, it keeps the six that satisfy OPE convergence, pole dominance and Borel stability, and extracts masses from the resulting QCD sum rules. The charm sector yields four states: $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and $T_{3c,0}(5000)$ with $J^P = 0^+$, and $T_{3c,0}(5040)$ and $T_{3c,0}(5370)$ with $J^P = 0^-$; the bottom sector gives masses in the 13.72–14.22 GeV range. The paper also argues for a decay pattern: states above charmonium- or bottomonium-plus-heavy-meson thresholds fall apart into a heavy quarkonium and a heavy-light meson, while the below-threshold states have no such two-body strong decay and should be narrow, making them attractive experimental targets in final states with a $D$ or $\bar{B}$ meson.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the QCD sum rule for a local tetraquark current: a two-point correlation function $\Pi(q^2)$ whose hadronic side is written as a ground-state pole plus a continuum starting at threshold $s_0$, and whose quark-gluon side is computed by the operator product expansion (OPE) up to dimension 9. A Borel transform suppresses the continuum and converts the matching condition into a sum rule from which the mass $M_X^2 = -\frac{\partial}{\partial \tau} \ln\left[\int_{s_<}^{s_0} ds\, \rho_{\mathrm{OPE}}(s,\tau)e^{-\tau s}\right]$ is read off. The currents that survive are selected by three quantitative criteria — OPE convergence (CVG$_{A/B/C} \le 5/10/20\%$), pole dominance (PC $\ge 40\%$), and Borel/threshold stability — and the four-gluon condensate entering at dimension 8 is parameterized by vacuum saturation with a factor $\kappa$ varied from 1 to 8 to test sensitivity.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of the lowest $J^P = 0^+$ and $0^-$ $(c\bar{c})(c\bar{q})$ and $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ tetraquark masses, or a heavy-flavor experiment that finds no narrow state within roughly 0.3 GeV of 4.76, 5.00, 5.04, or 5.37 GeV in the $D$-plus-light-hadron channel, would falsify the paper's central spectroscopy claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the $(Q\bar{Q})(Q\bar{q})$ tetraquark spectrum with $J^P = 0^\pm$ contains a discrete set of states that can be extracted from QCD sum rules. Using color-octet–color-octet and color-singlet–color-singlet currents, the authors find that only six of the eighteen constructed currents produce stable sum rules; three of them ($J_3$, $J_4$, $J_{10}$) converge to a common mass near 5.00 GeV, which they interpret as the same $0^+$ state, while $J_7$ yields a second $0^+$ state at 4.76 GeV, and $J_{15}$ and $J_{18}$ give $0^-$ states at 5.04 and 5.37 GeV. The bottom analogues come out in 13.72–14.02 GeV for $0^+$ and 13.90–14.22 GeV for $0^-$. The paper's key phenomenological claim is that $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and all predicted bottom tetraquarks lie below the relevant quarkonium-plus-heavy-meson thresholds, so their two-body strong fall-apart decays are kinematically forbidden; the states are therefore expected to be comparatively narrow and to show up in $D$ or $\bar{B}$ meson final states accompanied by light hadrons or a photon.

Load-bearing premise

The entire mass extraction rests on the quark-hadron duality ansatz — that above a chosen threshold the experimental spectral density can be replaced by the fixed-order OPE result — together with the truncation of that OPE at dimension 9 and the vacuum-saturation estimate of the four-gluon condensate; if this replacement is inaccurate for these color-octet currents, the central masses could shift beyond the quoted errors.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Four charmed tetraquark candidates — $T_{3c,0}(4760)$, $T_{3c,0}(5000)$, $T_{3c,0}(5040)$, and $T_{3c,0}(5370)$ — are predicted with masses 4.76, 5.00, 5.04, and 5.37 GeV and quantum numbers $J^P = 0^\pm$.
  • $T_{3c,0}(5000)$, $T_{3c,0}(5040)$, and $T_{3c,0}(5370)$ lie above at least one charmonium-plus-charmed-meson threshold, so they should undergo fall-apart two-body strong decays and have appreciable decay widths.
  • $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and all predicted $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ states sit below the corresponding quarkonium-plus-heavy-meson thresholds, making two-body fall-apart decays kinematically forbidden; these states are expected to be relatively narrow.
  • The predicted narrow states should be searched for in final states containing a $D$ or $\bar{B}$ meson together with light hadrons or a photon, rather than in quarkonium-plus-heavy-meson channels.
  • The coincidence of masses extracted from $J_3$, $J_4$, and $J_{10}$ around 5.00 GeV suggests that different interpolating currents couple to the same lowest-lying $0^+$ state, so future off-diagonal correlation-function analyses could consolidate the assignment.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural testable extension is to apply the same 18-current catalog to $(c\bar{c})(c\bar{s})$ or $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{s})$ systems; the masses should shift by strangeness effects and new narrow states might appear in $D_s$ or $\bar{B}_s$ final states.
  • The separation between the $J_7$ state at 4.76 GeV and the $J_3/J_4/J_{10}$ state near 5.00 GeV suggests two distinct $0^+$ states separated by roughly 240 MeV; measuring both in the same experiment would test whether the sum-rule extraction is resolving two poles or one state with contamination.
  • If the below-threshold states are as narrow as argued, high-luminosity heavy-flavor production could create them in appreciable numbers; their discovery would offer a direct probe of the color structure by comparing relative yields into $D$ versus charmonium channels.
  • The method's reliance on quark-hadron duality for high-dimensional currents could be checked by comparing these predictions against lattice QCD spectra or against the observed fully charmed tetraquark region, where existing data already constrain the same sum-rule machinery.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper performs a QCD sum-rule analysis of triply heavy tetraquarks with quark content (Q\bar Q)(Q\bar q) and J^P=0^\pm. It constructs eighteen local interpolating currents in the two color structures [8_c]\otimes[8_c] and [1_c]\otimes[1_c], computes the two-point correlation functions to dimension-9 OPE, and retains the six currents that pass OPE convergence, pole dominance, and Borel-stability criteria. Masses are extracted via the standard Borel sum rule, giving four charm candidates T_{3c,0}(4760), T_{3c,0}(5000), T_{3c,0}(5040), and T_{3c,0}(5370), and bottom-state masses in the ranges 13.72-14.02 GeV (0^+) and 13.90-14.22 GeV (0^-). The paper also lists fall-apart two-body decay modes and argues that states below the relevant charmonium/open-charm or bottomonium/open-bottom thresholds should be relatively narrow.

Significance. The paper addresses a topical but unobserved sector and is systematic in its current construction and in the application of the standard sum-rule validity criteria. Its strengths include explicit input parameters, quoted uncertainties that cover s0, the Borel window, and condensate inputs, a check of the vacuum-saturation factor kappa, and concrete experimental search channels. If the hadronic parametrization were fully justified, the predictions would be a useful guide for LHC and Belle II searches. However, as argued in Major Comment 1, the treatment of the above-threshold charm states is internally inconsistent with the decay analysis, so the central mass predictions for T_{3c,0}(5000), T_{3c,0}(5040), and T_{3c,0}(5370) are not yet on a solid footing; the below-threshold results are more robust.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (21); Table III] The phenomenological spectral density in Eq. (21) assumes a single zero-width pole at M_X^2 and a continuum that starts only at s0. For T_{3c,0}(5000) from J3, the extracted M_X^2 is about 25 GeV^2 with s0=29.0 GeV^2, while the eta_c D threshold is near (4.85 GeV)^2 ~ 23.5 GeV^2; the paper's own Table III states that this state decays to eta_c D. The physical two-meson strength between threshold and s0 is therefore silently assigned to the pole in Eq. (26), and the pole-contribution criterion in Eq. (33), which only requires the OPE integral up to s0 to be 40-60% of the full integral, cannot distinguish a narrow tetraquark pole from this unmodeled two-meson continuum. The same issue affects T_{3c,0}(5040) and T_{3c,0}(5370), for which Table III lists open decay channels below the fitted s0. Since the paper also describes these states as having appreciable widths, the zero-width single-pole ansatz is not self-consistent for them, and the extracted masses may be averages over the two-meson continuum. The below-threshold states (T_{3c,0}(4760) and the bottom candidates) are less exposed, but the three above-threshold charm predictions rest on this unmodeled contamination.
  2. [Appendix A; Tables I-II] The OPE spectral density is presented only for the representative current J3; the spectral densities for J4, J7, J10, J15, and J18, from which the central results in Tables I and II are obtained, are not given. This prevents independent verification of the numerical analysis and of the claimed stability criteria for the other five currents. The authors should provide the missing expressions or a reproducible ancillary file.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. IV, paragraph on T_{3c,0}(4760)] The sentence containing 'lies blow' should read 'lies below', and the same paragraph uses incomplete threshold notation in several places.
  2. [Abstract vs. Conclusion] The mass ranges quoted in the Abstract (13.72-14.02 GeV for 0^+ and 13.90-14.22 GeV for 0^-) differ from the ranges given in the Conclusion (13.77-13.97 GeV and 13.95-14.17 GeV); these numbers should be harmonized after propagating the Table II uncertainties.
  3. [Sec. III, Eq. (21)] The phrase 'thresholds 0 separates' should read 'the threshold s0 separates', and the symbol s0 should be rendered consistently throughout.
  4. [Figures 3-6] The figure captions and axis labels use nonstandard notation such as 'M J3 0+' and render s0 as '0' in several places; please standardize the notation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: masses are extracted from OPE sum rules, not fitted inputs, and self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained: Eq. (26) defines the Borel sum rule as an integral of the OPE spectral density, Eq. (27) extracts M_X^2 as the logarithmic derivative of that integral with respect to 1/M_B^2, and Eq. (28) then determines the coupling. The masses reported in Tables I and II are outputs of these integrals, not inputs. The auxiliary parameters s0 and M_B^2 are selected by the stated stability criteria — OPE convergence, pole contribution PC >= 40%, and Borel stability — rather than by matching known experimental states. Thus the central results do not reduce by construction to fitted constants. The single-delta-plus-continuum parametrization in Eq. (21) is an approximation whose fidelity for above-threshold states may be questioned, but that is a modeling or contamination concern, not a circular reduction: no equation in the paper sets the extracted mass equal to a threshold or to a fitted experimental value. The paper cites some prior works by overlapping authors (e.g., Refs. [60,66,73]), but these citations are contextual, not load-bearing: the OPE spectral densities are derived and displayed in Appendix A, the convergence criteria are adopted from the external Ref. [85], and no uniqueness theorem or unverified self-citation is invoked to forbid alternative interpretations. Therefore the analysis shows no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

This ledger counts auxiliary choices: s0 and the Borel window are selected by stability rather than derived; kappa parameterizes vacuum saturation; quark-hadron duality and the dimension-9 OPE truncation are standard but unproven assumptions. The heavy-quark masses and condensates are taken from prior literature and are not counted as free parameters here.

free parameters (3)
  • Continuum threshold s0 = 29.0+/-1.0 GeV^2 for J3; 26-33 GeV^2 for charm currents and 204.5-211.5 GeV^2 for bottom currents in Tables I-II
    Auxiliary parameter chosen by requiring minimal dependence of the extracted mass on the Borel scale; not determined from first principles, and the mass extraction depends on it.
  • Borel parameter working window M_B^2 = 2.52-3.50 GeV^2 for charm, 8.28-11.25 GeV^2 for bottom
    Auxiliary parameter constrained by OPE convergence and pole dominance criteria; the reported mass is the value in this window.
  • Vacuum saturation factor kappa = varied from 1 to 8; effect reported as small
    Introduced ad hoc to parameterize the four-gluon condensate as kappa times the squared gluon condensate; its variation is not a fit to data.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Quark-hadron duality: the continuum spectral density above s0 equals the OPE spectral density
    Invoked in Section III after Eq. (26); this is the standard but unproved bridge between hadron and quark-gluon descriptions in QCD sum rules.
  • domain assumption OPE truncation at dimension 9 is sufficient for the quoted precision
    Higher-dimension condensates are neglected; convergence is checked with CVG_A/B/C criteria, but these criteria are conventional, not rigorous bounds.
  • domain assumption Four-gluon condensate saturates as kappa times the squared gluon condensate
    Used in Section III and tested by varying kappa from 1 to 8; no independent determination of kappa is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Stability criteria identify a physical pole rather than an artifact
    The paper requires CVG thresholds and a pole contribution of at least 40 percent and then interprets the stable mass as a real tetraquark; these thresholds are choices rather than derived facts.
  • domain assumption Light quark mass mq is set to zero
    Section III states mq=0; this simplifies the spectral density and fixes the lower integration limit near 9 m_Q^2.
  • ad hoc to paper Similar masses from J3, J4 and J10 imply the same physical state
    Used to label T3c,0(5000); the paper acknowledges that off-diagonal correlation functions and mixing are needed for a definitive statement.
invented entities (1)
  • Tetraquark candidates T3c,0(4760), T3c,0(5000), T3c,0(5040), T3c,0(5370) and bottom counterparts
    purpose: Provide concrete mass and decay-pattern targets for experimental searches in D or B meson plus light hadron final states
    No experimental observation exists; masses and decay modes are falsifiable predictions of this paper only, so they lack independent evidence.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of QCD Sum Rule Analysis of Triply Heavy $(Q\bar{Q})(Q\bar{q})$ Tetraquark States with $J^P=0^{\pm}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D2VVJLLE

@misc{pith2026260808385,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: QCD Sum Rule Analysis of Triply Heavy $(Q\barQ)(Q\barq)$ Tetraquark States with $J^P=0^\pm$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D2VVJLLE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.08385}
}
abstract

Within the framework of QCD sum rules, we systematically investigate the mass spectra and possible decay patterns of the $(c\bar{c})(c\bar{q})$ and $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ tetraquark states with quantum numbers $J^{P}=0^{\pm}$. Based on two distinct color configurations, $[8_c]_{Q\bar{Q}} \otimes [8_c]_{Q\bar{q}}$ and $[1_c]_{Q\bar{Q}} \otimes [1_c]_{Q\bar{q}}$, we construct 18 interpolating currents for these states, and obtain stable sum rules for a subset of them. By calculating the corresponding two-point correlation functions, we extract their mass spectra. For the $(c\bar{c})(c\bar{q})$ system, we identify four possible tetraquark states: two with $J^{P}=0^+$, namely $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and $T_{3c,0}(5000)$, and two with $J^{P}=0^-$, denoted as $T_{3c,0}(5040)$ and $T_{3c,0}(5370)$. For the $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ system, the extracted masses are found to lie in the ranges $13.72$--$14.02$ GeV for the $J^{P}=0^+$ states and $13.90$--$14.22$ GeV for the $J^{P}=0^-$ states. We further analyze their possible decay modes. Our results indicate that $T_{3c,0}(5000)$, $T_{3c,0}(5040)$, and $T_{3c,0}(5370)$ can decay into a charmonium state and a charmed meson, and are therefore expected to have appreciable decay widths. By contrast, $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and all predicted $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ tetraquark states are expected to be relatively narrow, since the corresponding two-body strong decays via the fall-apart mechanism are kinematically forbidden. Therefore, $T_{3c,0}(4760)$ and all predicted $(b\bar{b})(b\bar{q})$ tetraquark states are promising candidates for experimental searches in final states containing a $D$ or a $\bar{B}$ meson, accompanied by light hadrons or a photon.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.08385 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Relevant Feynman diagrams to the two-point corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: The quantities CVG [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: The mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: The mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: The mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: The mass [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys.Lett

    M. Gell-Mann, A schematic model of baryons and mesons, Phys.Lett. 8 (1964) 214–215.doi:10.1142/ 9789814618113_0001

    1964

  2. [2]

    Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking

    G. Zweig, An SU(3) model for strong interaction symme- try and its breaking. Version 1, Tech. rep., CERN-TH- 401 (Jan 1964).doi:10.17181/CERN-TH-401

    doi:10.17181/cern-th-401 1964

  3. [3]

    S. K. Choi, et al., Observation of a narrow charmonium- like state in exclusiveB ± →K ±π+π−J/ψdecays, 9 J P Flavor content Hadronic state S-wave decay P-wave decay 0+ (c¯c)(c¯q) T3c,0(4760) – – T3c,0(5000) ηcD – (b¯b)(b¯q) T3b,0(13820) – – T3b,0(13910) – – 0− (c¯c)(c¯q) T3c,0(5040) – ηcD∗, J/ψD T3c,0(5370) ηcD∗ 0 (2300), χc0(1P)D ηcD∗, J/ψD (b¯b)(b¯q) T3b...

    2003

  4. [4]

    Navas, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys.Rev.D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110

    S. Navas, et al., Review of Particle Physics, Phys.Rev.D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110. 030001

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.110 2024

  5. [5]

    F.-K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U.-G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao, B.-S. Zou, Hadronic molecules, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90 (1) (2018) 015004, [Erratum: Rev.Mod.Phys. 94, 029901 (2022)].arXiv:1705.00141,doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.90.015004

    arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    Liu, H.-X

    Y.-R. Liu, H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, Pen- taquark and Tetraquark states, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 107 (2019) 237–320.arXiv:1903.11976,doi:10.1016/ j.ppnp.2019.04.003

    arXiv 2019

  7. [7]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, Y.-R. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, An updated review of the new hadron states, Rept.Prog.Phys. 86 (2023) 026201.arXiv:2204.02649, doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aca3b6

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front.Phys 21 (2026) 016300.arXiv:2502.11351, doi:10.15302/frontphys.2026.016300

    Z.-G. Wang, Review of the QCD sum rules for exotic states, Front.Phys 21 (2026) 016300.arXiv:2502.11351, doi:10.15302/frontphys.2026.016300

    arXiv 2026

Show all 86 references
  1. [9]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of ex- otic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept. 1108 (2025) 1– 108.arXiv:2404.06399,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024. 12.001

    2025 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Aubert, et al., Observation of a Narrow Meson De- caying toD + s π0 at a Mass of 2.32 GeV/c 2, Phys

    B. Aubert, et al., Observation of a Narrow Meson De- caying toD + s π0 at a Mass of 2.32 GeV/c 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 242001.arXiv:hep-ex/0304021,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.242001

    2003 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Besson, et al., Observation of a Narrow Resonance of Mass 2.46 GeV/c 2 Decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and Con- firmation of theD ∗ sJ (2317) State, Phys

    D. Besson, et al., Observation of a Narrow Resonance of Mass 2.46 GeV/c 2 Decaying toD ∗+ s π0 and Con- firmation of theD ∗ sJ (2317) State, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 032002.arXiv:hep-ex/0305100,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.68.032002,10.1103/PhysRevD.75.119908

    2003 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Krokovny, et al., Observation of theD sJ (2317) andD sJ (2457) in B decays, Phys

    P. Krokovny, et al., Observation of theD sJ (2317) andD sJ (2457) in B decays, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 262002.arXiv:hep-ex/0308019,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.91.262002

    2003 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Godfrey, N

    S. Godfrey, N. Isgur, Mesons in a Relativized Quark Model with Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985) 189–231.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.32.189

    1985 doi

  6. [14]

    R. N. Cahn, J. D. Jackson, Spin-Orbit and Tensor Forces in Heavy-quark Light-quark Mesons: Implications of the NewD s State at 2.32 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 037502.arXiv:hep-ph/0305012,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.68.037502

    2003 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Godfrey, Testing the Nature of theD ∗ sJ (2317)+ and DsJ (2463)+ States Using Radiative Transitions, Phys

    S. Godfrey, Testing the Nature of theD ∗ sJ (2317)+ and DsJ (2463)+ States Using Radiative Transitions, Phys. Lett. B 568 (2003) 254–260.arXiv:hep-ph/0305122, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2003.06.049

    2003 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Xiao, D.-Y

    C.-J. Xiao, D.-Y. Chen, Y.-L. Ma, Radiative and pionic transitions from theD s1(2460) to theD ∗ s0(2317), Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 094011.arXiv:1601.06399

    2016 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Barnes, F

    T. Barnes, F. E. Close, H. J. Lipkin, Implications of a DK molecule at 2.32 GeV, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 054006.arXiv:hep-ph/0305025,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.68.054006

    2003 arXiv

  10. [18]

    F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, E. Oset, T. Sekihara, Test- ing the molecular nature ofD ∗ s0(2317) andD ∗ 0 (2400) in semileptonic and B decays, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 014031.arXiv:1501.03422,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92. 014031

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    E. E. Kolomeitsev, M. F. M. Lutz, On Heavy light me- son resonances and chiral symmetry, Phys. Lett. B 582 (2004) 39–48.arXiv:hep-ph/0307133,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2003.10.118

    2004 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Hofmann, M

    J. Hofmann, M. F. M. Lutz, Open charm meson res- onances with negative strangeness, Nucl. Phys. A 733 (2004) 142–152.arXiv:hep-ph/0308263,doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysa.2003.12.013

    2004 arXiv

  13. [21]

    F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, H. C. Chiang, R. G. Ping, B. S. Zou, Dynamically generated 0+ heavy mesons in a heavy chiral unitary approach, Phys. Lett. B 641 (2006) 278– 285.arXiv:hep-ph/0603072,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2006.08.064

    2006 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Zhang, H.-C

    Y.-J. Zhang, H.-C. Chiang, P.-N. Shen, B.-S. Zou, Pos- sible S-wave Bound-States of Two Pseudoscalar Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 014013.arXiv:hep-ph/0604271, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.014013

    2006 arXiv

  15. [23]

    J. L. Rosner, Effects of S-wave thresholds, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 076006.arXiv:hep-ph/0608102,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.74.076006

    2006 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Guo, P.-N

    F.-K. Guo, P.-N. Shen, H.-C. Chiang, Dynamically gen- erated 1 + heavy mesons, Phys. Lett. B 647 (2007) 133– 139.arXiv:hep-ph/0610008,doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2007.01.050

    2007 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Cheng, W.-S

    H.-Y. Cheng, W.-S. Hou, B decays as spectroscope for charmed four quark states, Phys. Lett. B 566 (2003) 193–200.arXiv:hep-ph/0305038,doi:10.1016/ S0370-2693(03)00834-7

    2003 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Chen, X.-Q

    Y.-Q. Chen, X.-Q. Li, A Comprehensive Four-Quark In- terpretation ofD s(2317),D s(2457) andD s(2632), Phys. Rev. Lett. 93 (2004) 232001.arXiv:hep-ph/0407062, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.232001

    2004 arXiv

  19. [27]

    H. Kim, Y. Oh,D s(2317) as a four-quark state in QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 074012.arXiv: 10 hep-ph/0508251,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.074012

    2005 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Nielsen, R

    M. Nielsen, R. Matheus, F. Navarra, M. Bracco, A. Lozea, Diquark-antidiquark with open charm in QCD sum rules, Nucl.Phys.B Proc.Suppl. 161 (2006) 193–199. arXiv:hep-ph/0509131,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps. 2006.08.045

    2006 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Wang, S.-L

    Z.-G. Wang, S.-L. Wan,D s0(2317) as a tetraquark state with QCD sum rules in heavy quark limit, Nucl. Phys. A 778 (2006) 22–29.arXiv:hep-ph/0602080,doi:10. 1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.07.041

    2006 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Tang, C.-F

    L. Tang, C.-F. Qiao, Tetraquark States with Open Fla- vors, Eur.Phys.J.C 76 (2016) 558.arXiv:1603.04761, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-016-4436-7

    2016 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. M. Sirunyan, et al., Observation of theB 0 s →X(3872)ϕdecay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020) 152001.arXiv:2005.04764,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 125.152001

    2020 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Ablikim, et al., Study ofe +e− →γωJ/ψand Obser- vation ofX(3872)→ωJ/ψ, Phys

    M. Ablikim, et al., Study ofe +e− →γωJ/ψand Obser- vation ofX(3872)→ωJ/ψ, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 232002.arXiv:1903.04695,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 122.232002

    2019 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Ablikim, et al., Observation of the decay X(3872)→ π0χc1(1P), Phys

    M. Ablikim, et al., Observation of the decay X(3872)→ π0χc1(1P), Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 202001.arXiv: 1901.03992,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.202001

    2019 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Ablikim, et al., Study of open-charm decays and radiative transitions of the X(3872), Phys

    M. Ablikim, et al., Study of open-charm decays and radiative transitions of the X(3872), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020) 242001.arXiv:2001.01156,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.242001

    2020

  27. [35]

    Liu, Y.-M

    X. Liu, Y.-M. Wang, Revisiting B+ —>X(3872) + K+ in pQCD assigning to X(3872) 2(3)P1 charmonium, Eur. Phys. J. C 49 (2007) 643–650.doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-006-0135-0

    2007 doi

  28. [36]

    T. H. Wang, G. L. Wang, Radiative E1 decays of X(3872), Phys. Lett. B 697 (2011) 233–237.arXiv: 1006.3363,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2011.02.014

    2011 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Meng, K.-T

    C. Meng, K.-T. Chao, Decays of the X(3872) andχc1(2P) charmonium, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 114002.arXiv: hep-ph/0703205,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.114002

    2007 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Meng, G.-J

    L. Meng, G.-J. Wang, B. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Revisit the isospin violating decays of X(3872), Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) 094003.arXiv:2109.01333,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.104.094003

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    L. Meng, B. Wang, S.-L. Zhu, Predicting the ¯D(∗) s D(∗) s bound states as the partners of X(3872), Sci.Bull. 66 (2021) 1288–1295.arXiv:2012.09813,doi:10.1016/j. scib.2021.03.016

    2021 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ablikim, et al., Observation of a charged charmo- niumlike structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat √s= 4.26GeV, Phys.Rev.Lett

    M. Ablikim, et al., Observation of a charged charmo- niumlike structure ine +e− →π +π−J/ψat √s= 4.26GeV, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 252001.arXiv: 1303.5949,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252001,10. 1142/9789811217739_0033

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Liu, et al., Study ofe +e− →π +π−J/ψand Observation of a Charged Charmonium-like State at Belle, Phys.Rev.Lett

    Z. Liu, et al., Study ofe +e− →π +π−J/ψand Observation of a Charged Charmonium-like State at Belle, Phys.Rev.Lett. 110 (2013) 252002.arXiv:1304. 0121,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.252002,10.1103/ PhysRevLett.111.019901

    2013 doi

  34. [42]

    T. Xiao, S. Dobbs, A. Tomaradze, K. K. Seth, Observa- tion of the Charged HadronZ ± c (3900) and Evidence for the NeutralZ 0 c (3900) ine +e− →ππJ/ψat √s= 4170 MeV, Phys.Lett.B 727 (2013) 366–370.arXiv:1304. 3036,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2013.10.041

    2013 doi

  35. [43]

    C.-F. Qiao, L. Tang, Estimating the mass of the hid- den charm 1 +(1+) tetraquark state via QCD sum rules, Eur.Phys.J.C 74 (2014) 3122.arXiv:1307.6654,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-014-3122-x

    2014 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Braaten, How theZ c(3900) Reveals the Spec- tra of Quarkonium Hybrid and Tetraquark Mesons, Phys.Rev.Lett

    E. Braaten, How theZ c(3900) Reveals the Spec- tra of Quarkonium Hybrid and Tetraquark Mesons, Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013) 162003.arXiv:1305.6905, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.162003

    2013 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Zhang, Improved QCD sum rule study ofZ c(3900) as a ¯DD∗ molecular state, Phys.Rev.D 87 (2013) 116004

    J.-R. Zhang, Improved QCD sum rule study ofZ c(3900) as a ¯DD∗ molecular state, Phys.Rev.D 87 (2013) 116004. arXiv:1304.5748,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.116004

    2013 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Wang, Analysis of the Hidden-charm Tetraquark molecule mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 36 (2021) 2150107.arXiv:2012

    Z.-G. Wang, Analysis of the Hidden-charm Tetraquark molecule mass spectrum with the QCD sum rules, Int.J.Mod.Phys.A 36 (2021) 2150107.arXiv:2012. 11869,doi:10.1142/S0217751X21501074

    2021 doi

  39. [47]

    Yan, Z.-H

    L.-W. Yan, Z.-H. Guo, F.-K. Guo, D.-L. Yao, Z.-Y. Zhou, Reconciling experimental and lattice data of Zc(3900) in a J/ψπ-DD¯* coupled-channel analysis, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) (2024) 014026.arXiv:2307.12283,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.014026

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. Sadl, S. Collins, Z.-H. Guo, M. Padmanath, S. Prelovsek, L.-W. Yan, Charmoniumlike channels 1+ with isospin 1 from lattice and effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D 111 (5) (2025) 054513.arXiv:2406.09842, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.054513

    2025 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Chen, M.-L

    Y.-H. Chen, M.-L. Du, F.-K. Guo, Determination of theZ c(3900) and theZ cs(3985) states from joint anal- ysis of experimental and lattice data (4 2026).arXiv: 2604.25607

    2026 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Ablikim, et al., Observation of a charged char- moniumlike structureZ c(4020) and search for the Zc(3900) ine +e− →π +π−hc, Phys.Rev.Lett

    M. Ablikim, et al., Observation of a charged char- moniumlike structureZ c(4020) and search for the Zc(3900) ine +e− →π +π−hc, Phys.Rev.Lett. 111 (2013) 242001.arXiv:1309.1896,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 111.242001,10.1142/9789811217739_0034

    2013 arXiv

  43. [51]

    R. Mizuk, et al., Observation of two resonance-like struc- tures in theπ +χc1 mass distribution in exclusive ¯B0 → K −π+χc1 decays, Phys.Rev.D 78 (2008) 072004.arXiv: 0806.4098,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.072004

    2008 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Wang, et al., Measurement ofe +e− →π +π−ψ(2S) via Initial State Radiation at Belle, Phys.Rev.D 91 (2015) 112007.arXiv:1410.7641,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91

    X. Wang, et al., Measurement ofe +e− →π +π−ψ(2S) via Initial State Radiation at Belle, Phys.Rev.D 91 (2015) 112007.arXiv:1410.7641,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91. 112007

    2015 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Aaij, et al., Evidence for anη c(1S)π − reso- nance inB 0 →η c(1S)K +π− decays, Eur.Phys.J.C 78 (2018) 1019.arXiv:1809.07416,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-018-6447-z

    R. Aaij, et al., Evidence for anη c(1S)π − reso- nance inB 0 →η c(1S)K +π− decays, Eur.Phys.J.C 78 (2018) 1019.arXiv:1809.07416,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-018-6447-z

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Chilikin, et al., Observation of a new charged charmo- niumlike state in ¯B0 →J/ψK −π+ decays, Phys.Rev.D 90 (2014) 112009.arXiv:1408.6457,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.112009

    K. Chilikin, et al., Observation of a new charged charmo- niumlike state in ¯B0 →J/ψK −π+ decays, Phys.Rev.D 90 (2014) 112009.arXiv:1408.6457,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.90.112009

    2014 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Choi, et al., Observation of a resonance-like structure in theπ ±ψ ′ mass distribution in exclusiveB→Kπ ±ψ ′ decays, Phys.Rev.Lett

    S. Choi, et al., Observation of a resonance-like structure in theπ ±ψ ′ mass distribution in exclusiveB→Kπ ±ψ ′ decays, Phys.Rev.Lett. 100 (2008) 142001.arXiv:0708. 1790,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.142001

    2008 doi

  48. [56]

    Bondar, et al., Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) decays, Phys.Rev.Lett

    A. Bondar, et al., Observation of two charged bottomonium-like resonances in Y(5S) decays, Phys.Rev.Lett. 108 (2012) 122001.arXiv:1110.2251, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.122001

    2012 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Aaij, et al., Observation of structure in theJ/ψ−pair mass spectrum, Sci.Bull

    R. Aaij, et al., Observation of structure in theJ/ψ−pair mass spectrum, Sci.Bull. 65 (2020) 1983–1993.arXiv: 2006.16957,doi:10.1016/j.scib.2020.08.032

    2020

  50. [58]

    Hayrapetyan, et al., New structures in theJ/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys.Rev.Lett

    A. Hayrapetyan, et al., New structures in theJ/ψJ/ψ mass spectrum in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Phys.Rev.Lett. 132 (2024) 111901.arXiv:2306. 07164,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.111901. 11

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    Aad, et al., Observation of an excess of di-charmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Phys.Rev.Lett

    G. Aad, et al., Observation of an excess of di-charmonium events in the four-muon final state with the ATLAS detector, Phys.Rev.Lett. 131 (2023) 151902.arXiv: 2304.08962,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.151902

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Tang, C.-G

    C.-M. Tang, C.-G. Duan, L. Tang, Fully Charmed Tetraquark States in 8 [c¯c]⊗8 [c¯c] Color Structure via QCD Sum Rules, Eur.Phys.J.C 84 (2024) 743.arXiv: 2405.05042,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13102-z

    2024 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Wu, Y.-S

    R.-H. Wu, Y.-S. Zuo, C.-Y. Wang, C. Meng, Y.-Q. Ma, K.-T. Chao, NLO results with operator mixing for fully heavy tetraquarks in QCD sum rules, JHEP 11 (2022) 023.arXiv:2201.11714,doi:10.1007/JHEP11(2022) 023

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Z.-H. Guo, J. A. Oller, Insights into the inner struc- tures of the fully charmed tetraquark stateX(6900), Phys. Rev. D 103 (3) (2021) 034024.arXiv:2011.00978, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.034024

    2021 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kuang, Q

    S.-Q. Kuang, Q. Zhou, D. Guo, Q.-H. Yang, L.-Y. Dai, Study of X(6900) with unitarized coupled chan- nel scattering amplitudes, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (5) (2023) 383.arXiv:2302.03968,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-023-11473-3

    2023 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Liang, X.-Y

    Z.-R. Liang, X.-Y. Wu, D.-L. Yao, Hunting for states in the recent LHCb di-J/ψinvariant mass spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 104 (3) (2021) 034034.arXiv:2104.08589,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.034034

    2021 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Wan, C.-F

    B.-D. Wan, C.-F. Qiao, Gluonic Tetracharm Configura- tion of X(6900), Phys.Lett.B 817 (2021) 136339.arXiv: 2012.00454,doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136339

    2021 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Tang, C.-G

    C.-M. Tang, C.-G. Duan, L. Tang, C.-F. Qiao, A novel configuration of gluonic tetraquark state, Eur.Phys.J.C 85 (2025) 396.arXiv:2411.11433,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14106-z

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Zhu, W.-X

    Z.-H. Zhu, W.-X. Zhang, D. Jia, Triply heavy tetraquark states: masses and other properties, Eur.Phys.J.C 84 (2024) 344.arXiv:2312.01908,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-024-12700-1

    2024 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Y. Liu, M. A. Nowak, I. Zahed, Heavy Holographic Exotics: Tetraquarks as Efimov States, Phys.Rev.D 100 (2019) 126023.arXiv:1904.05189,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.100.126023

    2019 arXiv

  61. [69]

    L¨ u, D.-Y

    Q.-F. L¨ u, D.-Y. Chen, Y.-B. Dong, E. Santopinto, Triply- heavy tetraquarks in an extended relativized quark model, Phys.Rev.D 104 (2021) 054026.arXiv:2107. 13930,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.054026

    2021 doi

  62. [70]

    Weng, W.-Z

    X.-Z. Weng, W.-Z. Deng, S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states, Phys.Rev.D 105 (2022) 034026.arXiv: 2109.05243,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.034026

    2022 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Song, J.-Q

    H. Song, J.-Q. Xie, J.-K. Chen, Regge trajecto- ries for the triply heavy triquarks, Eur.Phys.J.C 85 (2025) 482.arXiv:2408.03720,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-025-14217-7

    2025 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Jiang, W

    J.-F. Jiang, W. Chen, S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavyQQ ¯Q¯q tetraquark states, Phys.Rev.D 96 (2017) 094022.arXiv: 1708.00142,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.094022

    2017 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Zhang, L

    W.-S. Zhang, L. Tang, Investigating triply heavy tetraquark states through QCD sum rules, Nucl.Phys.A 1064 (2025) 123227.arXiv:2412.11531,doi:10.1016/ j.nuclphysa.2025.123227

    2025 arXiv

  66. [74]

    H.-M. Yang, Y. Ma, W.-L. Wu, S.-L. Zhu, Triply heavy tetraquark states with different flavors, Phys.Rev.D 111 (2025) 074040.arXiv:2502.10798,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.111.074040

    2025 arXiv

  67. [75]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Triply charm and bottom tetraquarks in a constituent quark model, Phys.Rev.D 110 (2024) 054036.arXiv:2407.14548,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.110.054036

    2024 arXiv

  68. [76]

    G. Yang, J. Ping, J. Segovia, Triply heavy tetraquarks ¯bc¯qcand ¯cb¯qbin a constituent quark model (2025). arXiv:2507.13728

    2025 arXiv

  69. [77]

    H.-X. Chen, A. Hosaka, S.-L. Zhu, Light scalar tetraquark mesons in the qcd sum rule, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 094025

    2007

  70. [78]

    H.-X. Chen, W. Chen, X. Liu, S.-L. Zhu, The hidden- charm pentaquark and tetraquark states, Phys. Rept. 639 (2016) 1–121

    2016

  71. [79]

    M. A. Shifman, A. Vainshtein, V. I. Zakharov, QCD and Resonance Physics. Theoretical Founda- tions, Nucl.Phys.B 147 (1979) 385–447.doi:10.1016/ 0550-3213(79)90022-1

    1979

  72. [80]

    Reinders, H

    L. Reinders, H. Rubinstein, S. Yazaki, Hadron Properties from QCD Sum Rules, Phys.Rept. 127 (1985) 1.doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(85)90065-1

    1985 doi

  73. [81]

    Narison, QCD parameters andf Bc from heavy quark sum rules, Nucl.Part.Phys.Proc

    S. Narison, QCD parameters andf Bc from heavy quark sum rules, Nucl.Part.Phys.Proc. 309-311 (2020) 135–147. arXiv:2001.06346,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2019. 11.024

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Narison, Gluon condensates and c, b quark masses from quarkonia ratios of moments, Phys.Lett.B 693 (2010) 559–566.arXiv:1004.5333,doi:10.1016/j

    S. Narison, Gluon condensates and c, b quark masses from quarkonia ratios of moments, Phys.Lett.B 693 (2010) 559–566.arXiv:1004.5333,doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2010.09.007

    2010 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Ovchinnikov, A

    A. Ovchinnikov, A. Pivovarov, QCD sum rule calcula- tion of the quark gluon condensate, Sov.J.Nucl.Phys. 48 (1988) 721–723

    1988

  76. [84]

    Jamin, Flavour-symmetry breaking of the quark condensate and chiral corrections to the Gell-Mann- Oakes-Renner relation, Phys.Lett.B 538 (2002) 71–76

    M. Jamin, Flavour-symmetry breaking of the quark condensate and chiral corrections to the Gell-Mann- Oakes-Renner relation, Phys.Lett.B 538 (2002) 71–76. arXiv:hep-ph/0201174,doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(02) 01951-2

    2002 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Su, H.-X

    N. Su, H.-X. Chen,S−andP−wave fully strange tetraquark states from QCD sum rules, Phys.Rev.D 106 (2022) 014023.arXiv:2204.13959,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.106.014023

    2022 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Q.-N. Wang, W. Chen, H.-X. Chen, Exotic ¯D(∗) s D(∗) molecular states andsc¯q¯ctetraquark states withJ P = 0+,1 +,2 +, Chin.Phys.C 45 (2021) 093102.arXiv:2011. 10495,doi:10.1088/1674-1137/ac0b3b. 12 Appendix A: The OPE spectral densityρOPE(s) In the Appendix, we give the analy...

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.