Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 88 references

Suppressing Trapped-Electron-Mode-Driven Turbulence via Optimization of Three-Dimensional Shaping

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two optimized 3D stellarator shapes suppress trapped-electron-mode turbulence, exposing universal instabilities that a modest rise in beta reduces.

desk verdict A credible proof-of-principle that available-energy optimization suppresses TEMs in local QHS equilibria; the local-to-global embedding question is the main caveat, not the UI or beta results. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.18674 v1 pith:D3YCJ7LK submitted 2024-12-24 physics.plasm-ph

J. M. Duff , B. J. Faber , C. C. Hegna , M. J. Pueschel , P. W. Terry This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-ph PACS 52.35.Ra52.55.Hc52.65.Tt
keywords stellaratortrappedelectronmodequasihelicalsymmetryavailableenergyuniversalinstabilitygyrokineticturbulencebetastabilizationhelicaltriangularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports two three-dimensionally shaped stellarator configurations, one with negative and one with positive helical triangularity, generated by optimizing a local equilibrium for quasihelical symmetry and for the available energy of trapped electrons. In gyrokinetic simulations the trapped electron mode (TEM) is suppressed in both, and the sign of the triangularity no longer matters the way it does in tokamaks. With a strong density gradient and no temperature gradient, the dominant low-$k_y$ instabilities become universal instabilities, which drive substantial heat flux; a moderate increase in plasma beta halves that heat flux in the negative-triangularity case and nearly eliminates it in the positive-triangularity case.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the available-energy metric $f_{\mathrm{TEM}}$, an integral over trapped-electron pitch angles and wells of the free energy available to collisionless trapped-electron fluctuations, built from the normalized bounce-averaged drift frequencies $\hat{\omega}_x$, $\hat{\omega}_y$ and the diamagnetic drift frequency $\hat{\omega}_*^T$. Because it depends only on geometry and background gradients, it is cheap enough to serve as an optimization target, and it is correlated with nonlinear TEM heat flux through $Q \propto f_{\mathrm{TEM}}^{3/2}$. The optimization minimizes $f_{\mathrm{TEM}}$ alongside a local quasisymmetry measure and penalty terms for shear, rotational transform, parallel current, aspect ratio, and flux-surface regularity, within a local three-dimensional MHD equilibrium with pressure gradient held at zero.

What would settle it

Embed the optimized local flux-surface shapes in a global equilibrium and repeat the linear and nonlinear gyrokinetic scans at $\omega_n=4$, $\omega_{T_e}=0$; if low-$k_y$ trapped-electron modes with TEM cross-phases reappear with growth rates near the reference configuration, or if raising $\beta$ to $4\times10^{-3}$ fails to reduce the heat flux, the local-optimization claim is not robust.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that minimizing the available energy of trapped electrons, together with a local measure of quasisymmetry, is sufficient to produce quasihelically symmetric stellarator equilibria whose TEM-driven turbulence is suppressed in gyrokinetic simulations. The two optimized equilibria cut the available-energy metric $f_{\mathrm{TEM}}$ by more than an order of magnitude relative to the starting equilibria and below the level of the reference quasihelically symmetric configuration, even though the two flux-surface shapes keep opposite signs of helical triangularity. Linear mode identification, based on cross-phases and on artificial removal of particle trapping and curvature, then shows that at $\omega_n = 4$, $\omega_{T_e} = 0$ the low-$k_y$ instabilities in these configurations are toroidal universal instabilities (negative triangularity) and slab universal instabilities (positive triangularity), not trapped electron modes. Nonlinear simulations show that universal instabilities can drive electron heat flux more than an order of magnitude larger than the TEM flux in the reference configuration, and that raising $\beta$ to a few times $10^{-3}$ halves (negative triangularity) or nearly suppresses (positive triangularity) that flux while electromagnetic heat flux remains at least an order of magnitude smaller.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that suppressing the available energy of trapped electrons on one local flux surface with zero pressure gradient, at one chosen gradient pair, is enough to suppress TEM-driven turbulence in a physically realized quasihelically symmetric stellarator; global equilibrium effects could change trapping, shear, or curvature and undo the suppression.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Available-energy optimization can be used as a fast, geometry-only proxy for TEM stability in stellarator design, replacing much more expensive gyrokinetic objective evaluations.
  • In these reduced-TEM equilibria, the sign of helical triangularity (negative vs positive) is not the controlling factor for TEM suppression or turbulence; available energy is.
  • At low beta and strong density gradient, the instability that limits confinement in such optimized configurations may be the universal instability rather than a TEM, so reduced TEM activity alone does not guarantee low transport.
  • A moderate increase in plasma beta (a few times $10^{-3}$) can substantially reduce UI-driven electrostatic heat flux without introducing significant electromagnetic heat flux, although in the positive-triangularity case beta near $10^{-2}$ excites a kinetic ballooning mode.
  • Future stellarator optimizations aimed at electrostatic drift-wave transport should include a UI target, or operate at sufficiently high beta, when density gradients are large.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension is to build a complementary available-energy-style metric for the passing-electron density-gradient free energy that drives universal instabilities, and minimize it together with the TEM target; the paper leaves that combination unexplored.
  • Because the optimization was performed on a single flux surface with $p'=0$, the practical payoff depends on whether the optimized shape survives embedding in a global equilibrium; that is a testable next step not carried out here.
  • The beta dependence suggests an operational design rule: in quasihelically symmetric devices with strong density gradients, operating near a few times $10^{-3}$ in beta may suppress both TEMs and UIs, while too-low beta leaves UI transport and too-high beta risks electromagnetic modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper reports two local 3D stellarator equilibria, one with helically rotating negative triangularity (NT) and one with positive triangularity (PT), obtained by optimizing a local MHD equilibrium for quasihelical symmetry and the available energy of trapped electrons. The authors verify TEM suppression with linear and nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations: in the density-gradient-only scenario (ωn=4, ωTe=0), the dominant low-ky instabilities in the optimized configurations are identified as toroidal universal instabilities (NT) and slab universal instabilities (PT), which drive substantial electrostatic heat flux, while HSX remains TEM-dominated. A β scan shows that moderate β reduces or nearly suppresses this UI-driven heat flux, with electromagnetic heat flux remaining subdominant. The paper concludes that future optimizations targeting electrostatic drift-wave turbulence should consider UIs as well as TEMs.

Significance. If the result holds, this is a valuable demonstration that a fast, geometry-based available-energy objective can be used in stellarator optimization to suppress TEM-driven turbulence, and it usefully identifies UIs as a possible unintended consequence of such optimization. The paper's strengths are its converged nonlinear gyrokinetic simulations for the ωn=4, ωTe=0 scenario, the careful mode-identification procedure based on electron cross phases and controlled geometry modifications (constant-B and slab-like limits), and the clear, falsifiable prediction that UIs dominate at low ky and are stabilized by moderate β. The available-energy target is taken from prior published work, so there is no circularity in the suppression claim. The main caveats are that the optimized equilibria are local, single-flux-surface, p'=0 equilibria, and that all linear identification and β-scan results use only kx=0 modes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. II.1–II.2] The optimization is performed on local 3D equilibria with p' fixed to zero at a single flux surface s=0.5 (Eq. 8 and Sec. II.1), and the available-energy target fTEM relies on curvature expressions Eqs. (28)–(29) that are valid only for p'=0. The manuscript never demonstrates that these optimized surfaces can be embedded in a global equilibrium with nested flux surfaces. In a global solution, force balance couples the surface shape to pressure and current profiles, so global shear, integrated local shear Λ, curvature components, and the magnetic-well structure can all change; since TEM suppression is achieved by modifying exactly these quantities, the reported suppression and UI dominance may not persist. The authors should either add a global-equilibrium check (e.g., with VMEC) on the same surface, or explicitly re-scope all claims from 'configurations' to 'local flux-tube equilibria' throughout the abstract and conclusions.
  2. [Sec. III and Sec. V] All linear eigenvalue results, including the mode-identification procedure and the β scan, are restricted to kx=0; the text states 'Only modes centered at kx=0 were computed.' The nonlinear cross-phase histograms in Figs. 8 and 9 show discrepancies from the linear kx=0 cross phases at 0.4 ≤ ky ≤ 0.7, which the authors attribute to 'clusters of subdominant UIs or UIs at finite kx.' This leaves open the possibility that finite-kx modes are the true dominant instabilities at low ky, which would affect both the UI-dominance claim and the β-stabilization results in Sec. V. The authors should justify the kx=0 restriction by presenting kx spectra for representative ky values, or scan kx for at least a few ky values.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. II.2] The abstract and conclusions describe the optimized objects as 'configurations' without noting that they are local, single-flux-surface equilibria; adding a qualifier would prevent over-interpretation.
  2. [Sec. II.2, Sec. III.1, Sec. V, Appendix A.1] There are several typos: 'configuartion' in Sec. II.2, 'hare' for 'are' in Sec. III.1, 'decease' for 'decrease' in Sec. V, and 'occurrs' in Appendix A.1.
  3. [Fig. 12 caption] The caption states 'with ωn = 0, ωT e = 4', but the Sec. V text states the scan uses ωn = 4 and ωTe = 0; this should be corrected.
  4. [Fig. 24 caption and Appendix A.1 text] The Fig. 24 caption says the 'NT configuration' although the surrounding text describes the PT equilibrium; also, in Appendix A.1 the growth-rate discussion for the PT case is attributed to Fig. 20, but Fig. 20 displays the NT case. Please re-check the figure/table numbering and cross-references.
  5. [Sec. IV] The nonlinear simulations for the ωn=0, ωTe=4 scenario are stated to be not converged; the claim that there are 'no significant fluctuations observed at scales with ky ≤ 2' should therefore be presented more cautiously or supported with a resolution check.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: optimized geometries are validated by independent gyrokinetic simulations, and no fitted quantity is recycled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained rather than circular. The stated claim is that two configurations optimized for quasihelical symmetry and the available-energy metric fTEM exhibit suppressed TEM-driven turbulence and, under density-gradient drive, UI-dominated transport. The optimization objective fTEM is taken from prior published theory and used only as a low-cost proxy; the paper explicitly acknowledges that the Q ∝ f_TEM^{3/2} scaling is approximate and that reaching reduced fTEM will only "likely" reduce TEM-driven flux. The actual TEM-suppression claim is not read off from fTEM; it is verified by independent linear gyrokinetic calculations in GENE and by nonlinear flux computations on the optimized equilibria. No parameter fitted to the GENE results is fed back into the optimization, and no equation in the paper defines the predicted instability or flux to be identical to an optimization target. The UI identification uses external mode-diagnostic procedures based on cross-phases and controlled geometry modifications, and although one coauthor appears in the cited Ref. 33, the diagnostic is a published methodology rather than a result that this paper's conclusion is assumed to satisfy. A few comparison data points, such as HSX nonlinear fluxes from Ref. 53, come from earlier work by overlapping groups, but they serve as benchmark comparisons, not as constraints that force the outcome. The local-equilibrium limitation (p'=0, single surface) is a real transferability and correctness risk, but it is a generalization gap rather than a circular reduction of the claimed result to its inputs. Therefore no circular step meeting the required evidence standard is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on AE-metric optimization plus gyrokinetic validation; no new physical entities are introduced. Several hand-chosen parameters (weights, gradients, targets) influence the equilibria, and the local p'=0 equilibrium and geometry-based mode identification are the main domain assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • objective function weights wQS, wTEM, wS, wI, wSg, wA, wKp, wR, wFLR = not reported
    Relative weights in Eq. (8) set the trade-offs that determine the final equilibria; no numeric values are provided, so the reported shapes are not independently reproducible and may be sensitive to these choices.
  • AE target gradients (omegaTe, omega n) = omegaTe=3, omega n=2
    Chosen by hand in Sec. II.1 to evaluate fTEM; different gradients would produce different optimized equilibria and potentially different stability outcomes.
  • linear and nonlinear drive scenario gradients = omega n=4, omegaTe=0 (main); omega n=0, omegaTe=4; beta scan range
    The UI-domination and heat-flux results depend on these choices; Fig. 11 shows heat flux drops quickly as omega n is reduced, so the conclusions are tied to the strong-gradient scenario.
  • penalty target values S0, I0, Sg0, A0, Kp0, Rmin, g0 = Kp0=0.01, Rmin=0.6; others not fully listed
    Penalty targets in Eq. (8) constrain rotational transform, shear, parallel current, aspect ratio, curvature, and FLR regularization; not all numeric values are given, making exact reproduction difficult.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gyrokinetic Vlasov-Maxwell equations as implemented in GENE describe TEM, UI, and KBM stability and transport in the core plasma.
    Used throughout Secs. III-V; the paper's conclusions are only as valid as the gyrokinetic model and its flux-tube approximation.
  • domain assumption Local 3D MHD equilibrium with p'=0 at s=0.5 is a valid representation of a quasihelically symmetric stellarator core.
    Sec. II uses local equilibrium with p'=0 and a single flux surface; no global equilibrium is shown to embed these surfaces.
  • domain assumption Available energy fTEM is a monotone predictor of TEM-driven heat flux, with Q proportional to fTEM^1.5.
    Invoked in Sec. II.1 (Ref. 47) to justify using fTEM as an optimization target; if the scaling breaks down, the design rationale weakens.
  • domain assumption Removing particle trapping via constant-B geometry and removing curvature via slab geometry isolates UI versus TEM identity without other confounding changes.
    Mode identification in Sec. III and Appendix A relies on these geometry alterations; the paper itself notes branch jumps and hybrids, so the identification is not airtight.
  • domain assumption Flux-tube simulations at kx=0 capture the dominant turbulent drive.
    Only kx=0 linear modes are computed; the paper acknowledges that nonzero-kx or subdominant modes may contribute (Sec. III.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Suppressing Trapped-Electron-Mode-Driven Turbulence via Optimization of Three-Dimensional Shaping." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/D3YCJ7LK

@misc{pith2026241218674,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Suppressing Trapped-Electron-Mode-Driven Turbulence via Optimization of Three-Dimensional Shaping},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/D3YCJ7LK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.18674}
}
abstract

Turbulent transport driven by trapped electron modes (TEMs) is believed to drive significant heat and particle transport in quasihelically symmetric stellarators. Two three-dimensionally-shaped magnetic configurations with suppressed trapped-electron-mode (TEM)-driven turbulence were generated through optimization that targeted quasihelical symmetry and the available energy of trapped electrons. Initial equilibria have flux surface shapes with a helically rotating negative triangularity (NT) and positive triangularity (PT). In gyrokinetic simulations, TEMs are suppressed in the reduced-TEM NT and PT configurations, showing that negative triangularity does not have the same beneficial turbulence properties over positive triangularity as seen in tokamaks. Heat fluxes from TEMs are also suppressed. Without temperature gradients and with a strong density gradient, the most unstable modes at low $k_y$ were consistent with toroidal universal instabilities (UIs) in the NT case and slab UIs in the PT case. Nonlinear simulations show that UIs drive substantial heat flux in both the NT and PT configurations. A moderate increase in $\beta$ halves the heat flux in the NT configuration, while suppressing the heat flux in the PT geometry. Based on the present work, future optimizations aimed at reducing electrostatic drift wave-driven turbulent transport will need to consider UIs if $\beta$ is sufficiently small.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.18674 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Toroidal cross sections over a half field period for the initial equilibrium used in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Toroidal cross-sections over a half field period for the reduced-TEM equilibria for the NT [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Normalized bounce-averaged drift frequency as a function of normalized pitch angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (28 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Normalized bounce-averaged drift frequency as a function of normalized pitch angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Normalized bounce-averaged drift frequency as a function of normalized pitch angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest-growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Histograms of nonlinear cross phases for the NT equilibrium (logarithmic color scale) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Histograms of nonlinear cross phases for the PT equilibrium (logarithmic color scale) and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10: Nonlinear electron electrostatic heat flux with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11: Nonlinear electron electrostatic heat flux with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: With an increase to β = 4 × 10−3 , the heat flux for the NT geometry is halved, while the PT geometry sees nearly complete suppression at β = 2×10−3 . The decease in heat fluxes is consistent with the stabilization of the dominant UI instabilities at low ky. While the…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14: Nonlinear electron electrostatic heat flux with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Cross phases in HSX with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential for dominant modes (solid) in HSX with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17: Cross phases in the NT reduced-TEM geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential for dominant modes (solid) in the NT geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential for dominant modes (solid) in the NT geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: FIG. 21: Cross phases in the PT reduced-TEM geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential for dominant modes (solid) in the PT geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential for dominant modes (solid) in the PT geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_23.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: FIG. 24: Growth rates (top) and frequencies (bottom) of the fastest growing modes with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_24.png]
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25: Cross phases in HSX with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_25.png]
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26: Cross phases in the reduced-TEM NT geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_26.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27: Cross phases in the reduced-TEM PT geometry with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_27.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: FIG. 28: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential along the field line for the fastest growing mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_28.png]
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential along the field line for the fastest growing mode at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_29.png]
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30: Amplitude of the electrostatic potential along the field line for the fastest growing mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_30.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author L. I. \ Rudakov \ and\ author R. Z. \ Sagdeev ,\ @noop journal journal Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR \ volume 138 ,\ pages 581 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

    1961

  2. [2]

    Horton , author D.-I

    author author W. Horton , author D.-I. \ Choi ,\ and\ author W. M. \ Tang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863486 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1077 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.863486 1981

  3. [3]

    Rewoldt , author L.-P

    author author G. Rewoldt , author L.-P. \ Ku ,\ and\ author W. M. \ Tang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2089247 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 12 ,\ pages 102512 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2089247 2005

  4. [4]

    Xanthopoulos \ and\ author F

    author author P. Xanthopoulos \ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2714328 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 14 ,\ pages 042501 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2714328 2007

  5. [5]

    Xanthopoulos , author F

    author author P. Xanthopoulos , author F. Merz , author T. G \"o rler ,\ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.035002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 99 ,\ pages 035002 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.99.035002 2007

  6. [6]

    author author J. A. \ Baumgaertel , author E. A. \ Belli , author W. Dorland , author W. Guttenfelder , author G. W. \ Hammett , author D. R. \ Mikkelsen , author G. Rewoldt , author W. M. \ Tang ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3662064 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 122301 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3662064

  7. [7]

    author author J. A. \ Baumgaertel , author G. W. \ Hammett , author D. R. \ Mikkelsen , author M. Nunami ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4771587 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 19 ,\ pages 122306 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4771587

  8. [8]

    Xanthopoulos , author G

    author author P. Xanthopoulos , author G. G. \ Plunk , author A. Zocco ,\ and\ author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021033 journal journal Phys. Rev. X \ volume 6 ,\ pages 021033 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.021033 2016

Show all 88 references
  1. [9]

    author author G. G. \ Plunk , author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ and\ author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.105002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 118 ,\ pages 105002 ( year 2017 a ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  2. [10]

    author author I. J. \ McKinney , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author B. J. \ Faber , author C. C. \ Hegna , author J. N. \ Talmadge , author D. T. \ Anderson , author H. E. \ Mynick ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377819000588 journal journal J. Pla...

    doi

  3. [11]

    u hrenberg , author F. Rau , author J. Sapper , author F. Sardei , author R. Scardovelli , author A. Schl \

    author author C. Beidler , author G. Grieger , author F. Herrnegger , author E. Harmeyer , author J. Kisslinger , author W. Lotz , author H. Maassberg , author P. Merkel , author J. N \"u hrenberg , author F. Rau , author J. Sapper , author F. Sardei , author R. Scardovelli , ...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Klinger , author C

    author author T. Klinger , author C. Baylard , author C. D. \ Beidler , author J. Boscary , author H. S. \ Bosch , author A. Dinklage , author D. Hartmann , author P. Helander , author H. Ma berg , author A. Peacock , author T. S. \ Pedersen , author T. Rummel , author F. Scha...

    doi

  5. [13]

    author author M. N. A. \ Beurskens , author S. Bozhenkov , author O. Ford , author P. Xanthopoulos , author A. Zocco , author Y. Turkin , author A. Alonso , author C. Beidler , author I. Calvo , author D. Carralero , author T. Estrada , author G. Fuchert , author O. Grulke , a...

  6. [14]

    author author C. C. \ Hegna , author D. T. \ Anderson , author A. Bader , author T. Bechtel , author A. Bhattacharjee , author M. Cole , author M. Drevlak , author J. M. \ Duff , author B. J. \ Faber , author S. R. \ Hudson , author M. Kotschenreuther , author T. G. \ Kruger ,...

  7. [15]

    author author H. E. \ Mynick , author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ and\ author A. H. \ Boozer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3258848 journal journal Phys. of Plasmas \ volume 16 ,\ pages 110702 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    2009 doi

  8. [16]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel , author B. J. \ Faber , author J. Citrin , author C. C. \ Hegna , author P. W. \ Terry ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Hatch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.085001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 116 ,\ pages 085001 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  9. [17]

    author author H. E. \ Mynick , author N. Pomphrey ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.095004 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 095004 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  10. [18]

    author author H. E. \ Mynick , author N. Pomphrey ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3560591 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 056101 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011 doi

  11. [19]

    Mynick , author P

    author author H. Mynick , author P. Xanthopoulos , author B. Faber , author M. Lucia , author M. Rorvig ,\ and\ author J. N. \ Talmadge ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/56/9/094001 journal journal Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion \ volume 56 ,\ pages 094001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    doi

  12. [20]

    Kim , author S

    author author P. Kim , author S. Buller , author R. Conlin , author W. Dorland , author D. Dudt , author R. Gaur , author R. Jorge , author E. Kolemen , author M. Landreman , author N. R. \ Mandell ,\ and\ author D. Panici ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377824000369 journal j...

    doi

  13. [21]

    author author B. B. \ Kadomtsev \ and\ author O. P. \ Pogutse ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/11/1/010 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 11 ,\ pages 67 ( year 1971 ) NoStop

    1971 doi

  14. [22]

    author author J. M. \ Canik , author D. T. \ Anderson , author F. S. B. \ Anderson , author K. M. \ Likin , author J. N. \ Talmadge ,\ and\ author K. Zhai ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.085002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 98 ,\ pages 085002 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [23]

    author author B. J. \ Faber , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author J. H. E. \ Proll , author P. Xanthopoulos , author P. W. \ Terry , author C. C. \ Hegna , author G. M. \ Weir , author K. M. \ Likin ,\ and\ author J. N. \ Talmadge ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926510 journal jour...

    doi

  16. [24]

    author author J. H. E. \ Proll , author P. Helander , author J. W. \ Connor ,\ and\ author G. G. \ Plunk ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.245002 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 108 ,\ pages 245002 ( year 2012 a ) NoStop

    doi

  17. [25]

    author author J. H. E. \ Proll , author P. Helander , author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ and\ author J. W. \ Connor ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/401/1/012021 journal journal J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. \ volume 401 ,\ pages 012021 ( year 2012 b ) NoStop

    doi

  18. [26]

    Helander , author J

    author author P. Helander , author J. H. E. \ Proll ,\ and\ author G. G. \ Plunk ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4846818 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 20 ,\ pages 122505 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    author author J. H. E. \ Proll , author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ and\ author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4846835 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 20 ,\ pages 122506 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    2013 doi

  20. [28]

    author author J. H. E. \ Proll , author G. G. \ Plunk , author B. Faber , author T. G \"o rler , author P. Helander , author I. J. \ McKinney , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author H. M. \ Smith ,\ and\ author P. Xanthopoulos ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S002237782200006X journal jo...

    doi

  21. [29]

    author author F. S. B. \ Anderson , author A. F. \ Almagri , author D. T. \ Anderson , author P. G. \ Matthews , author J. N. \ Talmadge ,\ and\ author J. L. \ Shohet ,\ https://doi.org/10.13182/FST95-A11947086 journal journal Fusion Technology \ volume 27 ,\ pages 273 ( year ...

    doi

  22. [30]

    author author J. H. E. \ Proll , author H. E. \ Mynick , author P. Xanthopoulos , author S. A. \ Lazerson ,\ and\ author B. J. \ Faber ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/58/1/014006 journal journal Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion \ volume 58 ,\ pages 014006 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  23. [31]

    author author M. J. \ Gerard , author B. Geiger , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author A. Bader , author C. C. \ Hegna , author B. J. \ Faber , author P. W. \ Terry , author S. T. A. \ Kumar ,\ and\ author J. C. \ Schmitt ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/acc1f6 journal journal...

    doi

  24. [32]

    author author M. J. \ Gerard , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author B. Geiger , author R. J. J. \ Mackenbach , author J. M. \ Duff , author B. J. \ Faber , author C. C. \ Hegna ,\ and\ author P. W. \ Terry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0203569 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume...

    doi

  25. [33]

    Costello , author J

    author author P. Costello , author J. H. E. \ Proll , author G. G. \ Plunk , author M. J. \ Pueschel ,\ and\ author J. A. \ Alcus \'o n ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377823000533 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 89 ,\ pages 905890402 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [34]

    Chowdhury , author R

    author author J. Chowdhury , author R. Ganesh , author S. Brunner , author J. Vaclavik ,\ and\ author L. Villard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3490238 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 17 ,\ pages 102105 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  27. [35]

    Helander \ and\ author G

    author author P. Helander \ and\ author G. G. \ Plunk ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4932081 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 22 ,\ pages 090706 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    Landreman , author T

    author author M. Landreman , author T. M. \ Antonsen ,\ and\ author W. Dorland ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.095003 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 095003 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Brchnelova , author M

    author author M. Brchnelova , author M. J. \ Pueschel ,\ and\ author S. Poedts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0223417 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 31 ,\ pages 092902 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    author author C. Z. \ Cheng \ and\ author L. Chen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863202 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1770 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980 doi

  31. [39]

    author author L. V. \ Mikhailovskaya \ and\ author A. B. \ Mikhailovskii ,\ @noop journal journal Soviet Physics JETP \ volume 18 ,\ pages 1077 ( year 1964 ) NoStop

    1964

  32. [40]

    author author J. D. \ Huba \ and\ author S. P. \ Gary ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863659 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 25 ,\ pages 1821 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  33. [41]

    author author D. E. \ Hastings \ and\ author J. E. \ McCune ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863763 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 25 ,\ pages 509 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  34. [42]

    author author D. R. \ Hatch , author P. W. \ Terry , author F. Jenko , author F. Merz , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author W. M. \ Nevins ,\ and\ author E. Wang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3563536 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 18 ,\ pages 055706 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  35. [43]

    author author C. C. \ Hegna ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1290282 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 7 ,\ pages 3921 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    doi

  36. [44]

    author author J. M. \ Duff , author B. J. \ Faber , author C. C. \ Hegna , author M. J. \ Pueschel ,\ and\ author P. W. \ Terry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0065585 journal journal Physics of Plasmas \ volume 29 ,\ pages 012303 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  37. [45]

    Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377817000496 journal journal J

    author author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377817000496 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 715830401 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377820000057 journal journal J

    author author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377820000057 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 905860201 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020 doi

  39. [47]

    author author R. J. J. \ Mackenbach , author J. H. E. \ Proll ,\ and\ author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.175001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 175001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    author author T. G. \ Kruger , author C. Zhu , author A. Bader , author D. T. \ Anderson ,\ and\ author L. Singh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821000106 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 175870201 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  41. [49]

    author author A. J. \ Brizard \ and\ author T. S. \ Hahm ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.421 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 79 ,\ pages 421 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  42. [50]

    Rodr \'i guez , author E

    author author E. Rodr \'i guez , author E. J. \ Paul ,\ and\ author A. Bhattacharjee ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821001331 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 88 ,\ pages 905880109 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  43. [51]

    author author A. H. \ Boozer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.863297 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1999 ( year 1981 ) NoStop

    1999 doi

  44. [52]

    Landreman \ and\ author E

    author author M. Landreman \ and\ author E. Paul ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 035001 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  45. [53]

    author author B. J. \ Faber , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author P. W. \ Terry , author C. C. \ Hegna ,\ and\ author J. E. \ Roman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377818001022 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 905840503 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  46. [54]

    author author R. J. J. \ Mackenbach , author J. M. \ Duff , author M. J. \ Gerard , author J. H. E. \ Proll , author P. Helander ,\ and\ author C. C. \ Hegna ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160282 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 30 ,\ pages 093901 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  47. [55]

    author author J. M. \ Duff ,\ https://gitlab.com/jduff2/AvailableEnergyMetic.jl title AvailableEnergyMetric .jl NoStop

  48. [56]

    author author R. L. \ Miller , author M. S. \ Chu , author J. M. \ Greene , author Y. R. \ Lin-Liu ,\ and\ author R. E. \ Waltz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.872666 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 5 ,\ pages 973 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    doi

  49. [57]

    Weisen , author J.-M

    author author H. Weisen , author J.-M. \ Moret , author S. Franke , author I. Furno , author Y. Martin , author M. Anton , author R. Behn , author M. J. \ Dutch , author B. P. \ Duval , author F. Hofmann , author B. Joye , author C. Nieswand , author Z. A. \ Pietrzyk ,\ and\ a...

    doi

  50. [58]

    \ Moret , author S

    author author J.-M. \ Moret , author S. Franke , author H. Weisen , author M. Anton , author R. Behn , author B. P. \ Duval , author F. Hofmann , author B. Joye , author Y. Martin , author C. Nieswand , author Z. A. \ Pietrzyk ,\ and\ author W. van Toledo ,\ https://doi.org/10...

    doi

  51. [59]

    Pochelon , author T

    author author A. Pochelon , author T. P. \ Goodman , author M. Henderson , author C. Angioni , author R. Behn , author S. Coda , author F. Hofmann , author J.-P. \ Hogge , author N. Kirneva , author A. A. \ Martynov , author J.-M. \ Moret , author Z. A. \ Pietrzyk , author F. ...

  52. [60]

    Camenen , author A

    author author Y. Camenen , author A. Pochelon , author R. Behn , author A. Bottino , author A. Bortolon , author S. Coda , author A. Karpushov , author O. Sauter , author G. Zhuang ,\ and\ author TCV team ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/47/7/002 journal journal Nucl. Fusi...

    doi

  53. [61]

    Fontana , author L

    author author M. Fontana , author L. Porte , author S. Coda , author O. Sauter ,\ and\ author TCV Team ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/aa98f4 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 58 ,\ pages 024002 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  54. [62]

    author author M. E. \ Austin , author A. Marinoni , author M. L. \ Walker , author M. W. \ Brookman , author J. deGrassie , author A. W. \ Hyatt , author G. R. \ McKee , author C. C. \ Petty , author T. L. \ Rhodes , author S. P. \ Smith , author C. Sung , author K. E. \ Thome...

    doi

  55. [63]

    Marinoni , author M

    author author A. Marinoni , author M. E. \ Austin , author A. W. \ Hyatt , author M. L. \ Walker , author J. Candy , author C. Chrystal , author C. J. \ Lasnier , author G. R. \ McKee , author T. Odstr c il , author C. C. \ Petty , author M. Porkolab , author J. C. \ Rost , au...

    doi

  56. [64]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel , author S. Coda , author A. Balestri , author J. Ball , author R. J. J. \ Mackenbach , author J. M. \ Duff , author G. Snoep ,\ and\ author the TCV Team ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/ad3563 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 64 ,\ page...

    doi

  57. [65]

    Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/8/087001 journal journal Rep

    author author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/8/087001 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 77 ,\ pages 087001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  58. [66]

    author author J. P. \ Freidberg ,\ @noop title Ideal MHD \ ( publisher Cambridge University Press ,\ address Cambridge ,\ year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  59. [67]

    author author J. M. \ Duff \ and\ author B. J. \ Faber ,\ https://gitlab.com/jduff2/NE3DLE title Numerical Evaluation of 3D Local Equilibria NoStop

  60. [68]

    author author B. J. \ Faber , author A. Bader ,\ and\ author J. M. \ Duff ,\ https://gitlab.com/WISTELL/StellaratorOptimization.jl title StellaratorOptimization .jl NoStop

  61. [69]

    author author J. W. \ Connor , author R. J. \ Hastie ,\ and\ author T. J. \ Martin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0029-5515/23/12/017 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 23 ,\ pages 1702 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983 doi

  62. [70]

    author author C. C. \ Hegna ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4926818 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 22 ,\ pages 072510 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  63. [71]

    author author M. A. \ Beer \ and\ author G. W. \ Hammett ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871574 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 3 ,\ pages 4018 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  64. [72]

    author author I. G. \ Abel , author G. G. \ Plunk , author E. Wang , author M. Barnes , author S. C. \ Cowley , author W. Dorland ,\ and\ author A. A. \ Schekochihin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/76/11/116201 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 116201 ...

    doi

  65. [73]

    Jenko , author W

    author author F. Jenko , author W. Dorland , author M. Kotschenreuther ,\ and\ author B. N. \ Rogers ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.874014 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1904 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    1904 doi

  66. [74]

    Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(99)00489-0 journal journal Comput

    author author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-4655(99)00489-0 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 125 ,\ pages 196 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000 doi

  67. [75]

    https://genecode.org/ title The GENE Code NoStop

  68. [76]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel , author T. Dannert ,\ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.010 journal journal Comput. Phys. Commun. \ volume 181 ,\ pages 1428 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  69. [77]

    Kammerer , author F

    author author M. Kammerer , author F. Merz ,\ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2909618 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 15 ,\ pages 052102 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  70. [78]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel , author M. Kammerer ,\ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3005380 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 15 ,\ pages 102310 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  71. [79]

    author author G. G. \ Plunk , author J. W. \ Connor ,\ and\ author P. Helander ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377817000605 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 715830404 ( year 2017 b ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  72. [80]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel , author D. R. \ Hatch , author M. Kotschenreuther , author A. Ishizawa ,\ and\ author G. Merlo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-4326/abba49 journal journal Nucl. Fusion \ volume 60 ,\ pages 124005 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  73. [81]

    Mulholland , author K

    author author P. Mulholland , author K. Aleynikova , author B. J. \ Faber , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author J. H. E. \ Proll , author C. C. \ Hegna , author P. W. \ Terry ,\ and\ author C. N \"u hrenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.185101 journal journal Phys. ...

    doi

  74. [82]

    Hirose , author L

    author author A. Hirose , author L. Zhang ,\ and\ author M. Elia ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.871437 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 2 ,\ pages 859 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  75. [83]

    Hirose \ and\ author M

    author author A. Hirose \ and\ author M. Elia ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.628 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 628 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  76. [84]

    author author M. J. \ Pueschel \ and\ author F. Jenko ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3435280 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 17 ,\ pages 062307 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  77. [85]

    Kotschenreuther ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.865490 journal journal Phys

    author author M. Kotschenreuther ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.865490 journal journal Phys. Fluids \ volume 29 ,\ pages 2898 ( year 1986 ) NoStop

    1986 doi

  78. [86]

    Aleynikova \ and\ author A

    author author K. Aleynikova \ and\ author A. Zocco ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5000052 journal journal Phys. Plasmas \ volume 24 ,\ pages 092106 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017 doi

  79. [87]

    Aleynikova , author A

    author author K. Aleynikova , author A. Zocco , author P. Xanthopoulos , author P. Helander ,\ and\ author C. N \"u hrenberg ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377818001186 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 84 ,\ pages 745840602 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  80. [88]

    author author I. J. \ McKinney , author M. J. \ Pueschel , author B. J. \ Faber , author C. C. \ Hegna , author A. Ishizawa ,\ and\ author P. W. \ Terry ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022377821000581 journal journal J. Plasma Phys. \ volume 87 ,\ pages 905870311 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.