Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Spacetime and Universal Soft Modes --- Black Holes and Beyond

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black hole heat and smooth interiors both arise from entanglement between visible hard modes and hidden soft modes, driven by string-scale chaos.

desk verdict A clear, carefully hedged elaboration of Nomura's soft-mode program; the central genericity assumption is honestly flagged, and the paper is a serious plausibility argument rather than a derivation. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.05728 v3 pith:DAMXDMQR submitted 2019-08-15 hep-th gr-qc

Yasunori Nomura This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qc PACS 04.70.Dy04.62.+v
keywords blackholeinteriorsoftmodeshardthermofielddoublestatestring-scalechaosdeSitterhorizonBornruleBMSsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the thermal radiation of a black hole, as seen from outside, is not produced by a special process at the horizon but is ordinary statistical mechanics of entanglement between two classes of low-energy modes: hard modes that semiclassical observers can resolve, and soft modes that are temporarily unobservable because of the large redshift. The claim is that chaotic dynamics at the string scale scrambles these modes into a generic state, so tracing out the soft modes yields the thermal Hawking state, while coarse-graining them builds an effective mirror Hilbert space that describes the interior as a smooth two-sided spacetime. If this picture is right, a black hole is a finite quantum system with unitary evolution, the smooth horizon follows without firewalls, and the same machinery applies to Rindler, de Sitter, and flat spacetimes. It also predicts O(1) breaking of global symmetries at the string scale and a self-repair mechanism that restores a smooth horizon before an infaller crosses it.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing construction is the hard/soft split of low-energy modes in the zone region $r_s \le r \le r_z$, with the cutoff $\Delta \approx O(1/(M l_P^2))$. Hard modes ($\omega \gtrsim \Delta$) are those semiclassical operators can describe; soft modes ($\omega \lesssim \Delta$) are operationally unresolvable within the timescale of a single Hawking emission. The paper coarse-grains the soft modes plus far modes into a single effective state $|\{n_\alpha\}\rangle\rangle$ with Boltzmann weight $e^{-E_n/2T_H}$, turning a generic one-sided microstate into the thermofield double state. The mirror operators $\tilde{b}_\gamma$, $\tilde{b}^\dagger_\gamma$ constructed on these coarse-grained states, together with ordinary hard-mode operators and Bogoliubov coefficients, define infalling modes and a Hamiltonian whose ground state is the smooth interior.

What would settle it

Take a finite-dimensional quantum system with an energy constraint split into hard and soft sectors, draw random coefficients from each constrained subspace, and check whether the reduced hard-mode state equals the thermal state $e^{-E_n/T_H}/Z$ up to exponentially small corrections. If typical draws miss the thermal state by a non-negligible amount, the genericity assumption collapses; likewise, an exact global symmetry at the string scale would violate the required scrambling.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

At the paper's center is the claim that black hole entropy $S_{\rm BH}(M)$ is carried by soft modes of low-energy fields, concentrated near the stretched horizon, with the hard/soft split set by a frequency cutoff $\Delta \approx O(1/(M l_P^2))$ somewhat above the Hawking temperature. A generic black hole microstate takes the form of a superposition over hard-mode occupation numbers $n$, soft-mode states with density $e^{S_{\rm BH}(M-E_n)}$, and far/radiation modes. Tracing out the soft modes yields a thermal density matrix with Boltzmann weights $e^{-E_n/T_H}$, and replacing the soft modes by a coarse-grained normalized double yields the thermofield double state of the two-sided black hole picture. Mirror operators built on this double describe the second exterior as collective excitations of soft modes and early radiation; with standard Bogoliubov coefficients they define infalling modes whose Hamiltonian has a smooth-horizon ground state. The interior thus emerges as an effective, non-unitary, finite-dimensional description limited to a causal region and to scales above the string length.

Load-bearing premise

The construction depends on black hole states being generic: the coefficients linking hard and soft modes must take typical values, which requires string-scale dynamics to scramble all low-energy species without exact selection rules or symmetries. If the state is not generic, tracing out soft modes does not give a thermal state and the smooth interior construction fails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mechanism holds, Hawking radiation is thermal because soft modes are traced out, while the overall evolution remains unitary; the Page curve for radiation entanglement follows from the index structure of soft-mode/radiation entanglement in Eq. (40).
  • The Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is carried by soft modes distributed over all low-energy species, about one degree of freedom per string area per species, so the entropy is reproduced using $l_P^2 \sim l_s^2/N$.
  • String-scale dynamics must be chaotic across all low-energy species and break global symmetries with O(1) strength; otherwise generic hard-soft entanglement fails and the interior does not form.
  • The same hard/soft construction applies to de Sitter spacetime, where coarse-graining soft modes produces the other hemisphere of the static patch, and the effective theory can describe information retrieved when the system tunnels to a Minkowski vacuum.
  • A black hole self-repairs: any measurement on early Hawking radiation that tries to project onto a particular hard-mode configuration is washed out by re-equilibration within $t_{\rm eq} = 4 M l_P^2 \ln(M l_P)$ before an infaller reaches the stretched horizon.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • As an editorial extension: in a finite-dimensional toy model with a hard/soft split and an energy constraint, the trace distance between the typical reduced hard-mode state and the Gibbs state $e^{-E_n/T_H}/Z$ should be exponentially small; if not, the paper's genericity assumption is stronger than stated.
  • As an editorial inference: if the Born-rule selection conjecture is correct, the interior description is not a gauge choice but is singled out by requiring a local Hamiltonian with states near its ground state, making the 'outside' of a de Sitter horizon an effective construction rather than a directly observable region.
  • As an editorial connection: the universal per-species soft-mode count suggests that in theories with many light species, black-hole-like behavior near the stretched horizon should set in at a common local temperature $\sim 1/l_s$, a feature that could be probed with constrained-Hilbert-space simulations of scrambling.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper elaborates a framework, previously developed by the author, in which the thermal nature of a black hole as seen by a distant observer is due to entanglement between 'hard' and 'soft' modes of low-energy fields. The interior of the black hole is claimed to be an effective description obtained by coarse-graining over the soft (and associated far) modes, leading to a thermo-field-double state and mirror operators. The framework is extended to Rindler, de Sitter, and asymptotically flat spacetimes, with an argument that in each case the same soft-mode mechanism operates. The final section proposes that the mirror construction is selected by the requirement that the Born rule be applicable to observables, a conjecture the author explicitly says is not proven.

Significance. If the framework is correct, it would provide a unified microscopic picture in which unitarity and the equivalence principle are reconciled, with concrete implications for global symmetries, horizon self-repair, de Sitter space, and the BMS structure of flat spacetime. The paper is valuable as a broad conceptual synthesis: it clearly identifies the assumptions needed (generic black-hole states, string-scale chaos across all species), connects to prior work on mirror operators and entanglement wedges, and makes the nontrivial claim that the Marolf-Polchinski Born-rule objection is evaded because low-energy operations do not create typical excited states. It is not, however, a closed derivation: the key coarse-graining step is prescribed rather than derived, and several central statements are explicitly conjectural. The paper would be more persuasive if the assumptions and their regime of validity were stated as such from the beginning and if concrete tests or model realizations were discussed.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, Eq. (12)] The coarse-graining step in Eq. (12) is a prescription, not a derivation. The text replaces the soft/far part of the state with a single normalized partner state carrying a Boltzmann weight e^{-E_n/2T_H}, and this is exactly what produces the thermo-field-double form in Eq. (13). The paper states that this requires well-scrambled hard and soft modes, but it does not show that generic coefficients force this particular replacement rather than, say, a mixed-state description or a different entangled structure. Since Eq. (18) and the smooth-horizon conclusion rest directly on Eq. (12), the central claim is conditional on an unproven coarse-graining rule. The authors should either provide a microscopic derivation of Eq. (12) from a concrete dynamical model or state explicitly that the TFD form of the interior is an additional postulate, and they should explain what evidence would falsify it.
  2. [Section 2.1, Eq. (9); Section 2.2, 'Horizon duality'] The thermal reduced density matrix in Eq. (9) relies on the assumption that the coefficients c_{n i_n a} in Eq. (8) take generic values in the hard- and soft-mode spaces. The only support offered for this genericity is the conjecture that string-scale dynamics is chaotic across all low-energy species and breaks all global symmetries with O(1) strength. This is a load-bearing assumption: if a low-energy sector has a conserved charge or a slow scrambler, the reduced hard-mode state can be block-diagonal with different effective temperatures, or retain off-diagonal correlations, and Eq. (13) would not follow. The paper presents this chaos conjecture as a consequence of the picture, but no concrete model, bound, or dynamical mechanism is given. The manuscript should clearly separate the conjecture from the derivation and discuss what kind of model would violate it.
  3. [Section 2.2, Eq. (27)] The identification of the soft-mode entropy with the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is only up to an incalculable O(1) factor: S_soft ~ M^2 l_P^2 ~ S_BH. Because the density of states N(M) in Eq. (6) was already set to e^{S_BH(M)}, the argument uses the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy as an input rather than deriving it, and an O(1) coefficient could in fact be, e.g., 10 or 1/10. The claim that the entire Bekenstein-Hawking entropy is carried by the soft modes is therefore not quantitatively established. The authors should indicate how the coefficient could be fixed, or weaken the claim accordingly.
  4. [Section 4, after Eq. (77)] The argument that the mirror construction is selected by the applicability of the Born rule is explicitly left as an unproven conjecture: the text states 'we have not proven it, the conjecture seems plausible.' This is an honest and useful statement, but it means that one of the paper's advertised goals, explaining the origin of the particular interior construction, is not met. The manuscript should either present a more concrete mechanism, e.g., based on quantum Darwinism or decoherence, or clearly label this part as an outlook rather than a result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Throughout] The notation is overloaded: N is used both for the number of low-energy species in Eq. (25) and for the density of states N(M) in Eq. (6). Different symbols would avoid confusion.
  2. [Section 2.1, Eq. (6)] The definition N(M) = e^{S_BH(M)} Δ/M and the subsequent statement that the logarithmic correction is neglected should be justified; the factor Δ/M is dimensionless in natural units, but the identification with the density of states is not explained in detail.
  3. [Section 3.3, Eq. (71)] The relation between the soft-mode degeneracy and the BMS group is only sketched. The approximate expression M ≈ U(A/4l_P^2) is suggestive but not derived; the authors should either supply a more precise statement or clearly tag this as a speculative remark.
  4. [General] The machine-readable version of the paper contains many LaTeX parsing artifacts (e.g., '/divid⟩s.al⟪0' instead of |...⟩), which make the derivation harder to follow. The authors should ensure that the published source compiles cleanly.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed derivation of a smooth black-hole interior is installed by the coarse-graining prescription: Eq. (12) defines the effective state to be the thermo-field double, and the smooth horizon is then read out by construction.

  1. self definitional [Section 2.1, Eq. (12) through Eq. (18)]
    "Suppose that at a boundary time t∗, the state of the system is given by Eq. (8) with cnina taking generic values in the n and in spaces. We can then erect an effective theory based on this state by coarse-graining the soft and far modes: [sum_{i_n,a} c_{n i_n a}|ψ_{i_n}(M−E_n)⟩|φ_a⟩ → e^{−E_n/2T_H}/√(∑_n e^{−E_n/T_H}) |{n_α}⟩⟩] ... The state in Eq. (8) in this effective theory is then given by [Eq. (13)] ... which takes the form of the standard thermofield double state in the two-sided black hole picture ... This leads to the physics of a smooth horizon."

    The coarse-graining operation in Eq. (12) is not derived from the microscopic dynamics; it is defined to replace the soft/far mode coefficients by exactly the thermo-field-double amplitudes e^{-E_n/2T_H}. The mirror operators in Eqs. (14)-(15) are then defined on these coarse-grained states, and the infalling operators in Eqs. (16)-(17) are Bogoliubov combinations of b and tilde{b}. A state of precisely this TFD form is, by standard field theory, the state for which infalling modes see a smooth horizon. Thus the smooth-horizon conclusion is put in by the choice of purification in Eq. (12); the paper's genericity and density-of-states conditions justify the exterior thermal reduced state Eq. (9), but not the particular interior purification.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.1, paragraph after Eqs. (12)-(13)]
    "We emphasize that in order to obtain the correct Boltzmann-weight coefficients in Eqs. (12, 13), ∝ e^{−E_n/2T_H}, it is important that the black hole has soft modes with the density of states given by e^{S_BH(E_soft)}, and that the hard and soft modes are well scrambled, giving c_{n i_n a} that take values statistically independent of n."

    The Boltzman-weight coefficients are the target output of the interior construction, but here they are stated as the condition that the input must satisfy: the density of states e^{S_BH(E_soft)} and n-independent generic coefficients are chosen precisely so that the coarse-grained state has the TFD weights. The exterior thermal state Eq. (9) can be obtained from these same inputs, but the specific purification used for the interior is not selected by them; it is selected by demanding the desired weights. This is a fitted input presented as the physical origin of the smooth horizon.

full rationale

The paper's exterior thermality argument (Eq. (9)) is not circular: given the Bekenstein-Hawking density of soft states and generic coefficients, tracing out soft modes does produce the Boltzmann weights. The circularity sits one step later. The coarse-graining map (12) is an ansatz that already contains the desired thermo-field-double coefficients, and all subsequent interior physics—mirror operators, infalling modes, smooth horizon—is a consequence of that ansatz. The paper explicitly stresses that coarse-graining is a prescription ('the operation of coarse-graining, i.e. ignoring the detailed structure of c_{n i_n a}'s, is different from tracing out degrees of freedom'), and Section 4 admits the selection of this construction is a conjecture ('we have not proven it, the conjecture seems plausible'). No load-bearing self-citation circularity is present: the framework is reproduced in the text, and the cited prior work [10] is elaborated rather than merely invoked. Score 6 reflects that the central interior claim is partially by construction, while the paper still contains substantial independent content, including the universal soft-mode counting, the global-symmetry-breaking conjecture, and the Rindler/de Sitter/BMS extensions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The framework uses statistical assumptions about generic states and chaotic string dynamics, plus undetermined O(1) factors, to reconstruct known black hole thermodynamics and an effective interior. The central claims rest on these inputs rather than on a derivation from a specific UV theory.

free parameters (4)
  • Hard/soft frequency cutoff Delta = O(10) * T_H
    The boundary between hard and soft modes is set to be about an order of magnitude above the Hawking temperature (Eq. 2). This choice is needed to make the construction work but is not fixed by any principle.
  • Stretched horizon offset = r_s - 2M l_P^2 ~ l_s^2/(M l_P^2)
    The stretched horizon is placed one string length from the mathematical horizon (Eq. 3). The numeric coefficient is undetermined.
  • Entropy density coefficient c = O(1), undetermined
    The soft-mode entropy estimate (Eq. 19) has an O(1) constant that is not computed; the match to the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy in Eq. (27) is only up to this incalculable factor.
  • Hard-soft equilibrium timescale t_eq = 4M l_P^2 ln(M l_P)
    The self-repair of the horizon requires the equilibrium timescale to be this value or shorter (Eq. 44); this is an assumption about the chaotic dynamics, not a derivation.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Bekenstein-Hawking entropy counts black hole microstates, and these are predominantly soft modes near the stretched horizon.
    Used in Eqs. (6)-(7) and (21)-(27); the paper assumes this identification without deriving it.
  • ad hoc to paper String-scale dynamics is chaotic across all low-energy species, erasing distinctions between species and making coefficients of the state generic.
    Invoked in Section 2.2 'Horizon duality'; this is the key input that produces thermal reduced states and smooth interiors.
  • domain assumption There is a quantum gravity relation l_P^2 ~ l_s^2/N between Planck length, string length, and number of species.
    Used in Eq. (26) to convert the soft-mode entropy into the Bekenstein-Hawking form.
  • ad hoc to paper The Born rule can only be applied to observables that admit amplification in a local environment, and this selects the interior mirror construction.
    Section 4 conjectures this selection principle; the paper states it has not been proven.
invented entities (2)
  • Soft modes as the microscopic carriers of the entire Bekenstein-Hawking entropy
    purpose: To give a microscopic account of black hole entropy and enable the interior construction
    The paper assigns the full Bekenstein-Hawking entropy to soft modes of low-energy fields, peaking at the stretched horizon (Eqs. 21-27); this assignment is specific to the framework and has no external test.
  • Mirror operators (second exterior modes)
    purpose: Effective operators for the black hole interior and the other side of the de Sitter horizon
    Defined in Eqs. (14)-(15) and (64)-(65) on coarse-grained states; they are constructed to make the horizon look smooth, and there is no independent falsifiable handle.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spacetime and Universal Soft Modes --- Black Holes and Beyond." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DAMXDMQR

@misc{pith2026190805728,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spacetime and Universal Soft Modes --- Black Holes and Beyond},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DAMXDMQR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.05728}
}
read the original abstract

Recently, a coherent picture of the quantum mechanics of an evaporating black hole has been presented which reconciles unitarity with the predictions of the equivalence principle. The thermal nature of a black hole as viewed in a distant reference frame arises from entanglement between the hard and soft modes, generated by the chaotic dynamics at the string scale. In this paper, we elaborate on this picture, particularly emphasizing the importance of the chaotic nature of the string (UV) dynamics across all low energy species in generating large (IR) spacetime behind the horizon. Implications of this UV/IR relation include O(1) breaking of global symmetries at the string scale and a self-repair mechanism of black holes restoring the smoothness of their horizons. We also generalize the framework to other systems, including Rindler, de Sitter, and asymptotically flat spacetimes, and find a consistent picture in each case. Finally, we discuss the origin of the particular construction adopted in describing the black hole interior as well as the outside of a de Sitter horizon. We argue that the construction is selected by the quantum-to-classical transition, in particular the applicability of the Born rule in a quantum mechanical world.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 1908.05728 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic depiction illustrating the idea that a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. For a branch having spacetime that appears approxi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Pattern of perturbations from a coherent quantum inflationary horizon

    astro-ph.CO 2019-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Holographic inflation is argued to imprint exact large-angle symmetries on the cosmic microwave background, most notably a vanishing temperature correlation at 90 degrees of angular separation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Black holes and entropy,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Black holes and entropy,” Phys. Rev. D 7, 2333 (1973)

    1973

  2. [2]

    Particle creation by black holes,

    S. W. Hawking, “Particle creation by black holes,” Commun. Math. P hys. 43, 199 (1975) Erratum: [Commun. Math. Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    work page 1975

  3. [3]

    Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,

    G. ’t Hooft, “Dimensional reduction in quantum gravity,” in Salamfestschrift, edited by A. Ali, J. Ellis, and S. Randjbar-Daemi (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994) , p. 284 [gr-qc/9310026]

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    The world as a hologram,

    L. Susskind, “The world as a hologram,” J. Math. Phys. 36, 6377 (1995) [hep-th/9409089]

    arXiv 1995

  5. [5]

    A covariant entropy conjecture,

    R. Bousso, “A covariant entropy conjecture,” JHEP 07, 004 (1999) [hep-th/9905177]

    arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    The large N limit of superconformal field theories a nd supergravity,

    J. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories a nd supergravity,” Int. J. Theor. Phys. 38, 1113 (1999) [Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 2, 231 (1998)] [hep-th/9711200]

    arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collap se,

    S. W. Hawking, “Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collap se,” Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 (1976)

    work page 1976

  8. [8]

    The information paradox: a pedagogical introdu ction,

    S. D. Mathur, “The information paradox: a pedagogical introdu ction,” Class. Quant. Grav. 26, 224001 (2009) [arXiv:0909.1038 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2009

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Black holes: comp lementarity or fire- walls?,

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, “Black holes: comp lementarity or fire- walls?,” JHEP 02, 062 (2013) [arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Reanalyzing an evaporating black hole,

    Y. Nomura, “Reanalyzing an evaporating black hole,” Phys. Rev. D 99, 086004 (2019) [arXiv:1810.09453 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  3. [11]

    An infalling observer in AdS/CFT,

    K. Papadodimas and S. Raju, “An infalling observer in AdS/CFT,” J HEP 10, 212 (2013) [arXiv:1211.6767 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Cool horizons for entangled bla ck holes,

    J. Maldacena and L. Susskind, “Cool horizons for entangled bla ck holes,” Fortsch. Phys. 61, 781 (2013) [arXiv:1306.0533 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Black hole interior in quantum gravity,

    Y. Nomura, F. Sanches and S. J. Weinberg, “Black hole interior in quantum gravity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 201301 (2015) [arXiv:1412.7539 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Violations of the Born rule in cool sta te-dependent horizons,

    D. Marolf and J. Polchinski, “Violations of the Born rule in cool sta te-dependent horizons,” JHEP 01, 008 (2016) [arXiv:1506.01337 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Gravitat ional waves in general relativity VII. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

    H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitat ional waves in general relativity VII. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Ro y. Soc. Lond. A 269, 21 (1962)

    1962

  8. [16]

    Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII. W aves in asymptotically flat space-times,

    R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity VIII. W aves in asymptotically flat space-times,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 270, 103 (1962)

    1962

  9. [17]

    On BMS invariance of gravitational scattering ,

    A. Strominger, “On BMS invariance of gravitational scattering ,” JHEP 07, 152 (2014) [arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]]. 26

    2014 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the in formation paradox,

    G. Penington, “Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the in formation paradox,” arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

    1905 arXiv

  11. [19]

    The entro py of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield, “The entro py of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,” arXiv:190 5.08762 [hep-th]

  12. [20]

    The Interior of a unitarily evaporating black hole,

    Y. Nomura, “The Interior of a unitarily evaporating black hole,” a rXiv:1911.13120 [hep-th]

    1911 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Pulling the boundary into t he bulk,

    Y. Nomura, P. Rath and N. Salzetta, “Pulling the boundary into t he bulk,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 026010 (2018) [arXiv:1805.00523 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  14. [22]

    The stretched horizo n and black hole complemen- tarity,

    L. Susskind, L. Thorlacius and J. Uglum, “The stretched horizo n and black hole complemen- tarity,” Phys. Rev. D 48, 3743 (1993) [hep-th/9306069]

    1993 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Holography in general space-times,

    R. Bousso, “Holography in general space-times,” JHEP 06, 028 (1999) [hep-th/9906022]

    1999 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Towa rd a holographic theory for general spacetimes,

    Y. Nomura, N. Salzetta, F. Sanches and S. J. Weinberg, “Towa rd a holographic theory for general spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 086002 (2017) [arXiv:1611.02702 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Notes on black hole evaporation,

    W. G. Unruh, “Notes on black hole evaporation,” Phys. Rev. D 14, 870 (1976)

    1976

  18. [26]

    Thermo field dynamics of black holes,

    W. Israel, “Thermo field dynamics of black holes,” Phys. Lett. A 57, 107 (1976)

    1976

  19. [27]

    Information in black hole radiation,

    D. N. Page, “Information in black hole radiation,” Phys. Rev. Let t. 71, 3743 (1993) [hep- th/9306083]

    1993

  20. [28]

    Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem,

    G. Dvali, “Black holes and large N species solution to the hierarchy problem,” Fortsch. Phys. 58, 528 (2010) [arXiv:0706.2050 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Black holes as mirrors: quantum infor mation in random subsys- tems,

    P. Hayden and J. Preskill, “Black holes as mirrors: quantum infor mation in random subsys- tems,” JHEP 09, 120 (2007) [arXiv:0708.4025 [hep-th]]

    2007 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Fast scramblers,

    Y. Sekino and L. Susskind, “Fast scramblers,” JHEP 10, 065 (2008) [arXiv:0808.2096 [hep- th]]

    2008 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Emergent classical spacetime from microstates of an incipient blac k hole,

    V. Balasubramanian, D. Berenstein, A. Lewkowycz, A. Miller, O. Parrikar and C. Rabideau, “Emergent classical spacetime from microstates of an incipient blac k hole,” JHEP 01, 197 (2019) [arXiv:1810.13440 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Universal upper bound on the entropy to e nergy ratio for bounded systems,

    J. D. Bekenstein, “Universal upper bound on the entropy to e nergy ratio for bounded systems,” Phys. Rev. D 23, 287 (1981)

    1981

  25. [33]

    Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,

    H. Casini, “Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound,” Class. Q uant. Grav. 25, 205021 (2008) [arXiv:0804.2182 [hep-th]]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    A bound on cha os,

    J. Maldacena, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “A bound on cha os,” JHEP 08, 106 (2016) [arXiv:1503.01409 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,

    D. Harlow and H. Ooguri, “Symmetries in quantum field theory and quantum gravity,” arXiv:1810.05338 [hep-th]. 27

    arXiv

  28. [36]

    Axions in string theory,

    P. Svrˇ cek and E. Witten, “Axions in string theory,” JHEP 06, 051 (2006) [hep-th/0605206]

    2006 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Planck scale physics an d the Peccei-Quinn mecha- nism,

    M. Kamionkowski and J. March-Russell, “Planck scale physics an d the Peccei-Quinn mecha- nism,” Phys. Lett. B 282, 137 (1992) [hep-th/9202003]

    1992 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Planck scale corrections to axion mod els,

    S. M. Barr and D. Seckel, “Planck scale corrections to axion mod els,” Phys. Rev. D 46, 539 (1992)

    1992

  31. [39]

    Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,

    R. Holman, S. D. H. Hsu, T. W. Kephart, E. W. Kolb, R. Watkins an d L. M. Widrow, “Solutions to the strong CP problem in a world with gravity,” Phys. Let t. B 282, 132 (1992) [hep-ph/9203206]

    1992 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Aspects of the Papadodimas-Raju proposal for t he black hole interior,

    D. Harlow, “Aspects of the Papadodimas-Raju proposal for t he black hole interior,” JHEP 11, 055 (2014) [arXiv:1405.1995 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Violations of the equivalence principle by a nonlocally r econstructed vacuum at the black hole horizon,

    R. Bousso, “Violations of the equivalence principle by a nonlocally r econstructed vacuum at the black hole horizon,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 041102 (2014) [arXiv:1308.3697 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Smooth causal patches for AdS black holes,

    S. Raju, “Smooth causal patches for AdS black holes,” Phys. R ev. D 95, 126002 (2017) [arXiv:1604.03095 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bulk locality and quantum erro r correction in AdS/CFT,

    A. Almheiri, X. Dong and D. Harlow, “Bulk locality and quantum erro r correction in AdS/CFT,” JHEP 04, 163 (2015) [arXiv:1411.7041 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Path integral derivation of blac k hole radiance,

    J. B. Hartle and S. W. Hawking, “Path integral derivation of blac k hole radiance,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 2188 (1976)

    1976

  37. [45]

    Acceleration radiation and generaliz ed second law of ther- modynamics,

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, “Acceleration radiation and generaliz ed second law of ther- modynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 25, 942 (1982)

    1982

  38. [46]

    Tensile strength and the mining of black holes,

    A. R. Brown, “Tensile strength and the mining of black holes,” Phy s. Rev. Lett. 111, 211301 (2013) [arXiv:1207.3342 [gr-qc]]

    2013 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Rie mannian space-time,

    S. A. Fulling, “Nonuniqueness of canonical field quantization in Rie mannian space-time,” Phys. Rev. D 7, 2850 (1973)

    1973

  40. [48]

    Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics,

    P. C. W. Davies, “Scalar particle production in Schwarzschild and Rindler metrics,” J. Phys. A 8, 609 (1975)

    1975

  41. [49]

    What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle,

    W. G. Unruh and R. M. Wald, “What happens when an accelerating observer detects a Rindler particle,” Phys. Rev. D 29, 1047 (1984)

    1984

  42. [50]

    Spacetime from unentan glement,

    Y. Nomura, P. Rath and N. Salzetta, “Spacetime from unentan glement,” Phys. Rev. D 97, 106010 (2018) [arXiv:1711.05263 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,

    T. Banks, “Cosmological breaking of supersymmetry?,” Int. J . Mod. Phys. A 16, 910 (2001) [hep-th/0007146]

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    TASI lectures on holographic space-time, SUSY and gravitational effective field theory,

    T. Banks, “TASI lectures on holographic space-time, SUSY and gravitational effective field theory,” arXiv:1007.4001 [hep-th]. 28

    arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,

    G. W. Gibbons and S. W. Hawking, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation,” Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738 (1977)

    1977

  46. [54]

    Physical theories, eternal inflation, and the qua ntum universe,

    Y. Nomura, “Physical theories, eternal inflation, and the qua ntum universe,” JHEP 11, 063 (2011) [arXiv:1104.2324 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Asymptotic symmetries and sublead ing soft graviton theorem,

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries and sublead ing soft graviton theorem,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 124028 (2014) [arXiv:1408.2228 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Dressed hard states and black h ole soft hair,

    M. Mirbabayi and M. Porrati, “Dressed hard states and black h ole soft hair,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 211301 (2016) [arXiv:1607.03120 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Soft hair as a soft wig,

    R. Bousso and M. Porrati, “Soft hair as a soft wig,” Class. Quant . Grav. 34, 204001 (2017) [arXiv:1706.00436 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Soft hair on blac k holes,

    S. W. Hawking, M. J. Perry and A. Strominger, “Soft hair on blac k holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 231301 (2016) [arXiv:1601.00921 [hep-th]]

    2016 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness,

    H. Ollivier, D. Poulin and W. H. Zurek, “Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 220401 (2004) [arXiv:quant-ph/0307229]

    2004 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Quantum Darwinism: entang lement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information,

    R. Blume-Kohout and W. H. Zurek, “Quantum Darwinism: entang lement, branches, and the emergent classicality of redundantly stored quantum information,” Phys. Rev. A 73, 062310 (2006) [arXiv:quant-ph/0505031]

    2006 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Quantum mechanics, spacetime locality, and gravit y,

    Y. Nomura, “Quantum mechanics, spacetime locality, and gravit y,” Found. Phys. 43, 978 (2013) [arXiv:1110.4630 [hep-th]]

    2013 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Multiverse interpretation of quan tum mechanics,

    R. Bousso and L. Susskind, “Multiverse interpretation of quan tum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. D 85, 045007 (2012) [arXiv:1105.3796 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Static quantum multiverse,

    Y. Nomura, “Static quantum multiverse,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 083505 (2012) [arXiv:1205.5550 [hep-th]]. 29

    2012 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.