Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Reconstructing f(R) gravity from Viaggiu holographic dark energy yields viable models of late-time acceleration for three infrared cutoffs.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 03:21 UTC pith:DAYSFGVA

load-bearing objection New closed-form f(R) for VHDE under three cutoffs, but the power-law ansatz freezes q so the claimed decelerated-to-accelerated transitions are not actually produced by the reconstruction. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.03308 v2 pith:DAYSFGVA submitted 2026-07-03 gr-qc

Reconstructing f(R) gravity from Viaggiu Holographic Dark Energy under Hubble, Event Horizon and Granda Oliveros cutoffs

Arushi Jhunjhunwala , Sayani Maity This is my paper
classification gr-qc PACS 04.50.Kd95.36.+x98.80.-k
keywords f(R) gravityViaggiu holographic dark energyreconstructioninfrared cutoffslate-time accelerationghost and tachyonic stabilitylocal gravity constraints
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Viaggiu holographic dark energy, whose entropy includes a volume correction from expanding horizons, can be matched to the effective dark-energy density of f(R) gravity. For the Hubble horizon, future event horizon and Granda–Oliveros cutoffs the authors solve the resulting differential equations under a power-law scale factor and obtain closed-form f(R). Graphical analysis of the equation-of-state and deceleration parameters demonstrates that each model can drive a transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion (or sustain acceleration). Standard viability tests confirm that the reconstructed functions remain free of ghosts and tachyons and stay close enough to general relativity to satisfy solar-system bounds. The result supplies a concrete geometric realisation of an entropy-corrected holographic dark-energy scenario.

Core claim

Explicit f(R) functions reconstructed from Viaggiu holographic dark energy under three infrared cutoffs reproduce the observed late-time transition to acceleration while satisfying the classical stability conditions f'(R)>0, f''(R)>0 and the local-gravity constraints |f'(R)-1|≪1, |R f''(R)|≪1.

What carries the argument

Correspondence equating the VHDE density (built from the entropy S=πL^{2}+2π H L^{3}) to the curvature-induced density ρ_f(R) of metric f(R) gravity; under a(t)∝t^n this yields second-order linear ODEs whose solutions are the reconstructed f(R).

Load-bearing premise

Every closed-form f(R) and every plotted cosmographic quantity rests on the single power-law ansatz for the scale factor; if the true expansion history is not well approximated by a pure power law, the analytic reconstructions no longer apply.

What would settle it

Compare the predicted H(z) or q(z) curves (or the best-fit n and δ) against high-redshift supernova, BAO or cosmic-chronometer data; a statistically significant mismatch that cannot be absorbed by re-tuning the free parameters would falsify the models.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reconstructs explicit f(R) forms by equating the curvature energy density of f(R) gravity to the Viaggiu holographic dark energy density under three IR cutoffs (Hubble horizon, future event horizon, Granda–Oliveros). Using a power-law scale factor a(t)=a0 t^n, it solves the resulting second-order differential equations for f(R), obtains closed-form solutions involving two homogeneous power-law terms plus a particular solution linear or quadratic in R, and then plots the equation-of-state parameter ω(z), deceleration parameter q(z), H(z), and the viability diagnostics f'(R), f''(R), |f'-1| and |R f''| versus redshift. The abstract and conclusions claim that the models successfully describe a decelerated-to-accelerated transition, remain free of ghost and tachyonic instabilities, and satisfy local-gravity constraints, thereby furnishing a consistent geometric realization of VHDE.

Significance. If the reconstruction and the claimed dynamical transitions were self-consistent, the work would supply a concrete geometric counterpart to a recently proposed entropy-corrected holographic model and would enlarge the catalogue of viable f(R) cosmologies. The algebraic derivation of the three closed-form f(R) expressions is transparent and the viability plots are a useful first check. However, the central dynamical claim rests on an inconsistent use of the power-law ansatz, so the present results do not yet constitute an independent geometric explanation of late-time acceleration.

major comments (3)
  1. [§II, Eq. (15); §IV, Fig. 3] §II Eq. (15) and the subsequent reconstruction (Eqs. 24, 32, 37): the entire analytic procedure assumes a pure power-law scale factor a(t)=a0 t^n. Under this ansatz H=n/t and therefore q=1/n-1 is strictly constant. A constant q cannot cross zero, yet Figs. 3(a)–(b) and the abstract claim a decelerated-to-accelerated transition. The plotted transitions must arise from evaluating the formal E^{2}(z) expressions (Eqs. 28, 34, 39) outside the domain of validity of the power-law solution, rendering the central dynamical claim unsupported by the reconstruction that was actually performed.
  2. [§IV, Figs. 2–8] §IV and the viability analysis: once f(R) has been obtained under a fixed-n background, the quantities ω(z), q(z), f'(R(z)) and f''(R(z)) are not independent predictions of the modified gravity theory; they simply re-express the input VHDE density. The free constants A1, A2, δ, n (and α, β for GO) are chosen by hand for each panel with no error bars, likelihood or observational constraint. Consequently the statements that the models are “free from ghost and tachyonic instabilities” and “consistent with solar-system constraints” are parameter-tuned rather than dynamically robust.
  3. [§II Eq. (18); §III Eqs. (28),(34),(39)] The expression for E^{2}(z) given in Eq. (18) and specialized in Eqs. (28), (34), (39) mixes the reconstructed f(R) (derived under power-law) with a general redshift dependence. For the reconstructed f(R) to be a consistent solution of the modified Friedmann equations, the Hubble history that emerges from those equations must reproduce the original power-law (or the original VHDE density). No such consistency check is performed; the plots therefore do not demonstrate that the f(R) models actually drive the claimed expansion history.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§II Eq. (1)] The action is written as R+f(R) in Eq. (1), yet the field equations and the effective densities treat f(R) as the full modification; the conventional notation f(R) for the entire Lagrangian density would avoid confusion.
  2. [Figs. 1–8] Several figures lack axis labels, legends or error bands; the parameter sets used for each panel are listed only in the text and are not tabulated, making reproducibility difficult.
  3. [throughout] Typographical inconsistencies appear throughout (e.g., “Granda Oliveros”, “Equqtion of state”, “prameter”, “cutt offs”, “sufficiently”). A careful proof-reading pass is needed.
  4. [§II] The continuity equations (11)–(12) assume non-interacting matter and dark energy; the paper never discusses whether an interaction term would alter the reconstructed f(R).

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged

Density correspondence makes ω/q plots re-expressions of input VHDE by construction; power-law ansatz freezes q=1/n-1 so claimed transitions cannot arise from the derived dynamics; free params hand-chosen to produce desired plots then advertised as model properties.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Abstract; §III (eqs. 24, 32, 37 and surrounding text); §IV; §V]
    "By implementing a correspondence between VHDE and curvature-induced energy density, we generate explicit forms of f(R) for different infrared cutoffs... The resulting models are analyzed graphically through the cosmological parameters such as the equation of state and deceleration parameter, revealing a successful description of the transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion."

    f(R) is obtained by setting the curvature density ρ_f(R) equal to the VHDE density ρ_d under the assumed background and solving the resulting ODE. By construction the effective fluid of the reconstructed model has the same energy density (hence the same expansion history on that background) as the input VHDE. The subsequent graphical analysis of ω(z) and q(z) therefore merely re-expresses the cosmology already built into VHDE; it is not an independent dynamical prediction of a new f(R) theory.

  2. other [§II Eq. (15) and (16); §IV.B and Fig. 3; Abstract and §V claims of transition]
    "Here we adopt a power-law form of the scale factor as a(t)=a0 t^n, n>0... From Fig:3(a), we observe that the trajectory of q yields the transition from decelerating to accelerating phase, crossing the de-Sitter limit q=-1. ... revealing a successful description of the transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion."

    All closed-form reconstructions rest on a(t)∝t^n, which forces H=n/t and therefore q=-1-Ḣ/H^{2}=1/n-1, a numerical constant fixed solely by the free index n. A constant cannot exhibit a continuous transition through q=0. Any plotted transition in Fig. 3 must arise from evaluating the formal E^{2}(z) expressions outside the domain in which the power-law solution (and the derived f(R)) is self-consistent. The central claim that the reconstructed models describe a decelerated-to-accelerated transition therefore does not follow from the derivation that was actually performed.

  3. fitted input called prediction [§IV.A–D (parameter choices for Figs. 2–8 and viability tests)]
    "The parameter values used are A1=0.23, A2=0.34, δ=1.222, and n=3.56. ... For the Hubble horizon, future event horizon, and Granda–Oliveros (GO) cutoffs, the parameter values are chosen as (A1,A2,δ,n)=(0.23,0.34,1.222,1.56), (21,0.002,1.56,3.5688), and (0.0005,−12,3.56,3.56) respectively, with α=10 and β=5 in the GO case."

    The general solution for f(R) contains free integration constants A1,A2; the VHDE and cutoff models further contain free parameters δ,n,α,β. These are manually selected so that the plotted ω(z) and q(z) display quintom/transition or pure-quintessence behaviour and so that f'>0, f''>0 and the solar-system inequalities hold. The hand-tuned outcomes are then presented as the models 'revealing' the transition and being free of ghost/tachyonic instabilities, converting parameter choices into claimed predictions of dynamics and viability.

full rationale

Reconstruction equates ρ_f(R)=ρ_VHDE (eqs. 24/32/37) under the power-law ansatz a(t)=a0 t^n of §II, solves the linear ODE for f(R), then plots ω(z) and q(z) of the resulting model and checks f'>0, f''>0. By construction the curvature fluid reproduces the input VHDE density (and thus its expansion history) on that background, so the cosmographic 'analysis' and viability statements rephrase the assumed VHDE+ansatz rather than independently predicting them. Under the same ansatz q≡1/n-1 is a pure constant fixed by the free index n; a constant cannot cross zero, yet Figs. 2–3 and the abstract/§V claim a decelerated-to-accelerated transition. The plotted transitions therefore require evaluating the formal E^{2}(z) expressions (28/34/39) outside the self-consistent domain of the ansatz used to derive f. Integration constants A1,A2 and parameters δ,n,α,β are manually selected so the curves exhibit the desired quintom/transition/viability behaviour; those hand-tuned outcomes are then presented as properties 'revealed' by the models. The algebraic reconstruction itself is a standard, non-circular procedure with independent content, but the strongest dynamical and viability claims reduce to the inputs by construction or by inconsistent evaluation, yielding partial circularity (score 6). No load-bearing self-citation uniqueness theorem or pure renaming of an external result is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on (i) the VHDE density formula taken from prior work, (ii) the standard f(R) field equations, (iii) the power-law scale-factor ansatz that converts the reconstruction into an ordinary differential equation, and (iv) a set of free constants that are adjusted by hand to produce acceptable plots. No new physical entity is postulated, but the free parameters and the power-law assumption are load-bearing and not independently constrained inside the paper.

free parameters (4)
  • A1, A2 (integration constants) = hand-chosen per plot
    Appear in every closed-form f(R); numerical values are chosen separately for each figure (e.g., A1=0.23, A2=0.34 for Hubble EoS) with no fitting procedure or prior.
  • δ (VHDE parameter) = 1.222–3.56
    Controls the overall amplitude of the holographic density; set to 1.222, 1.56 or 3.56 depending on the figure.
  • n (power-law index) = 0.57–3.57
    Defines the entire expansion history via a∝t^n; values 0.57–3.57 are selected to obtain desired transitions.
  • α, β (GO cutoff coefficients) = α=10, β=5
    Define the Granda-Oliveros infrared scale; fixed at α=10, β=5 for all GO plots without observational justification.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption Viaggiu entropy-area relation S=πL²+2π H L³ yields the holographic density ρ_d=δ²/(8π) L^{-4} S
    Taken from the cited VHDE papers [12,13] and used as the starting point for every reconstruction (§III).
  • ad hoc to paper Power-law scale factor a(t)=a0 t^n (n>0) is an adequate description of the cosmic expansion for the purpose of reconstruction
    Introduced in §II, Eq. (15); all subsequent analytic results depend on it.
  • domain assumption Equating the VHDE density to the effective f(R) density ρ_f(R) produces a gravitational theory that is cosmologically equivalent to VHDE
    Standard reconstruction premise stated at the opening of §III; the entire method rests on this identification.
  • domain assumption f'(R)>0 and f''(R)>0 are necessary and sufficient to guarantee absence of ghosts and tachyons
    Invoked in §IV.D as the viability criteria; standard in the f(R) literature but not re-derived here.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 19275 in / 3086 out tokens · 25952 ms · 2026-07-12T03:21:35.898503+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work explores the reconstruction of $f(R)$ gravity within the framework of newly proposed Viaggiu holographic dark energy (VHDE), which incorporates entropy corrections due to the dynamical nature of cosmological horizons. By implementing a correspondence between VHDE and curvature-induced energy density, we generate explicit forms of $f(R)$ for different infrared cutoffs, namely the Hubble horizon, future event horizon, and Granda Oliveros cutoff. The resulting models are analyzed graphically through the cosmological parameters such as the equation of state and deceleration parameter, revealing a successful description of the transition from decelerated to accelerated expansion. The viability of the reconstructed models is further examined through stability conditions and local gravity constraints, that yields the nature of the models as free from ghost and tachyonic instabilities and demonstrates VHDE-inspired $f(R)$ gravity model as a consistent and flexible geometric framework for explaining the late-time cosmic acceleration of the Universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03308 by Arushi Jhunjhunwala, Sayani Maity.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Equqtion of state vs redshift for three reconstructed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: deceleration parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. G. Riess, et al., Observational evidence from supernovae for an accelerating universe and a cosmological constant, Astronomical Journal 116 (1998) 1009–1038. arXiv:astro-ph/9805201, doi:10.1086/300499

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/300499 1998

  2. [2]

    Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of omega and lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophysical Journal 517 (1999) 565–586

    S. Perlmutter, et al., Measurements of omega and lambda from 42 high-redshift supernovae, Astrophysical Journal 517 (1999) 565–586. arXiv:astro-ph/9812133, doi:10.1086/307221

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/307221 1999

  3. [3]

    Collaboration, N

    P. Collaboration, N. Aghanim, et al., Planck 2018 results. vi. cosmological parameters, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020) A6. arXiv:1807.06209, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833910 2018

  4. [4]

    Weinberg, The cosmological constant problem, Reviews of Modern Physics 61 (1989) 1–23

    S. Weinberg, The cosmological constant problem, Reviews of Modern Physics 61 (1989) 1–23. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys. 61.1

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys 1989

  5. [5]

    Sahni, A

    V. Sahni, A. Starobinsky, The case for a positive cosmological lambda-term, International Journal of Modern Physics D 9 (2000) 373–444. arXiv:astro-ph/9904398, doi:10.1142/S0218271800000542

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 2000

  6. [6]

    E. J. COPELAND, M. SAMI, S. TSUJIKA W A, Dynamics of dark energy , International Journal of Modern Physics D 15 (11) (2006) 1753–1935. doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S021827180600942X

    doi:10.1142/s021827180600942x 2006

  7. [7]

    NOJIRI, S

    S. NOJIRI, S. D. ODINTSOV, Introduction to modified gravity and gravitational alternative for dark energy , International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 04 (01) (2007) 115–145. doi:10.1142/s0219887807001928. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0219887807001928

    doi:10.1142/s0219887807001928 2007

  8. [8]

    Li, A model of holographic dark energy, Physics Letters B 603 (2004) 1–5

    M. Li, A model of holographic dark energy, Physics Letters B 603 (2004) 1–5. arXiv:hep-th/0403127, doi:10.1016/j. physletb.2004.10.014

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j 2004

  9. [9]

    Maity, U

    S. Maity, U. Debnath, Tsallis, rényi and sharma-mittal holographic and new agegraphic dark energy models in d-dimensional fractal universe, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 134 (2019) 514. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/i2019-12884-6

    doi:10.1140/epjp/i2019-12884-6 2019

  10. [10]

    Sardar, S

    A. Sardar, S. Maity, U. Debnath, A. Pradhan, Different horizon cut-offs for tsallis, rényi and sharma-mittal holographic dark energies in hořava-lifshitz gravity , Annals of Physics 473 (2025) 169891. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2024.169891. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491624002987

    doi:10.1016/j.aop.2024.169891 2025

  11. [11]

    Maity, U

    S. Maity, U. Debnath, Study of tsallis, rényi and sharma–mittal holographic dark energies for entropy corrected modified field equations in hořava–lifshitz gravity , International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 17 (11) (2020) 2050170. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887820501704, doi:10.1142/S0219887820501704. 14 URL https://doi.org/10....

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887820501704 2020

  12. [12]

    S. Saha, S. Saha, N. Mahata, The peculiar case of the viaggiu holographic dark energy , Nuclear Physics B 1025 (2026) 117368. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117368. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117368

    doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2026.117368 2026

  13. [13]

    A. K. Halder, A. Paliathanasis, S. Viaggiu, A. Al Mamon, S. Saha, Viaggiu holographic dark energy in light of desi dr2 , Physics Letters B 876 (2026) 140442. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140442. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140442

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2026.140442 2026

  14. [14]

    Sarkar, S

    A. Sarkar, S. Chattopadhyay, The barrow holographic dark energy-based reconstruction of f (R) gravity and cosmology with Nojiri–Odintsov cutoff, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 18 (09) (2021) 2150148. doi:10.1142/S0219887821501486

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219887821501486 2021

  15. [15]

    Maity, A

    S. Maity, A. Kotal, Barrow agegraphic and new barrow agegraphic dark energy driven reconstruction of f(r) gravity and parameter constraints from observational data , Physics of the Dark Universe 50 (2025) 102184. doi:https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.dark.2025.102184. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212686425003772

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Chaudhary, U

    H. Chaudhary, U. Debnath, T. Roy, S. Maity, G. Mustafa, M. Arora, Constraints on the parameters of modified chaplygin– jacobi and modified chaplygin–abel gases in f(t) gravity , International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics 21 (14) (2024) 2450248. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887824502487, doi:10.1142/S0219887824502487. URL https://do...

    doi:10.1142/s0219887824502487 2024

  17. [17]

    P. Saha, S. Maity, U. Debnath, Reconstructing extended f(p) cubic gravity from entropy-corrected holographic and new agegraphic dark energy models , Modern Physics Letters A 37 (30) (2022) 2250204. arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0217732322502042, doi:10.1142/S0217732322502042. URL https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732322502042

    doi:10.1142/s0217732322502042 2022

  18. [18]

    Hamani Daouda, M

    M. Hamani Daouda, M. E. Rodrigues, M. J. S. Houndjo, Reconstruction of f(t) gravity according to holographic dark energy, The European Physical Journal C 72 (2) (Feb. 2012). doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1893-5 . URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1893-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-012-1893-5 2012

  19. [19]

    Mohanty, G

    D. Mohanty, G. N. Gadbail, P. K. Sahoo, Reconstruction of f(Q,T) gravity from Barrow holographic dark energy with infrared cutoffs and the effective gravitational coupling constraints (4 2026). doi:10.1142/s0219887826501902

    doi:10.1142/s0219887826501902 2026

  20. [20]

    S. K. Behera, P. P. Ray, Reconstruction of Accelerating Nonlinear f (T) Gravity Models via Hybrid Scale Factor: Cosmo- logical Dynamics and Bayesian Evidence (2 2026). arXiv:2602.13744

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Zhang, X

    X. Zhang, X. Yang, Y. Ren, S. Chen, Y. Shi, C. Cheng, X. He, Reconstructing Barrow Holographic Dark Energy in f (Q, T) Gravity and Cosmic Constraint (6 2025). arXiv:2506.17933

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Viaggiu, Holographic dark energy from generalized entropy, Entropy 21 (5) (2019) 413

    S. Viaggiu, Holographic dark energy from generalized entropy, Entropy 21 (5) (2019) 413. doi:10.3390/e21050413

    work page doi:10.3390/e21050413 2019

  23. [23]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, Modified f(r) gravity consistent with realistic cosmology: From matter dominated epoch to dark energy universe, Physical Review D 74 (2006) 086005. arXiv:hep-th/0608008, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.086005

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.086005 2006

  24. [24]

    T. P. Sotiriou, V. Faraoni, f (r) theories of gravity , Rev. Mod. Phys. 82 (2010) 451–497. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.82.451

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.82.451 2010

  25. [25]

    Nojiri, S

    S. Nojiri, S. D. Odintsov, H. Štefančić, Transition from a matter-dominated era to a dark energy universe , Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 086009. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.086009. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.74.086009

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.086009 2006

  26. [26]

    Maity, A

    S. Maity, A. Sanyal, P. Rudra, New agegraphic dark energy in loop quantum cosmology: a quantum gravitational per- spective on dark energy evolution, Eur. Phys. J. C 86 (2026) 211. doi:https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15375-y

    doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-026-15375-y 2026

  27. [27]

    Sultana, S

    S. Sultana, S. Chattopadhyay, Reconstruction of tsallis holographic dark energy via modified non-metric gravity: An f(q, c) approach , Journal of High Energy Astrophysics 53 (2026) 100620. doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100620. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100620

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100620 2026

  28. [28]

    A. G. Cohen, D. B. Kaplan, A. E. Nelson, Effective field theory, black holes, and the cosmological constant, Physical Review Letters 82 (25) (1999) 4971–4974. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4971

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.4971 1999

  29. [29]

    S. Wang, Y. Wang, M. Li, Holographic dark energy, Physics Reports 696 (2017) 1–57. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.003

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2017.06.003 2017

  30. [30]

    J. D. Bekenstein, Universal upper bound on the entropy-to-energy ratio for bounded systems, Physical Review D 23 (2) (1981) 287–298. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.23.287

    doi:10.1103/physrevd.23.287 1981

  31. [31]

    Faraoni, Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Horizons, Vol

    V. Faraoni, Cosmological and Black Hole Apparent Horizons, Vol. 907, 2015. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19240-6

    doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19240-6 2015

  32. [32]

    L. N. Granda, A. Oliveros, Infrared cut-off proposal for the holographic density, Phys. Lett. B 669 (2008) 275–277. arXiv:0810.3149, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.017

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.10.017 2008

  33. [33]

    L. N. Granda, A. Oliveros, New infrared cut-off for the holographic scalar fields models of dark energy, Phys. Lett. B 671 (2009) 199–202. arXiv:0810.3663, doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.074

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2008.11.074 2009

  34. [34]

    Motaghi, A

    M. Motaghi, A. Sheykhi, E. Ebrahimi, Holographic dark energy in barrow cosmology with granda-oliveros ir cutoff , Physics of the Dark Universe 46 (2024) 101710. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dark.2024.101710. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212686424002929 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2024.101710 2024

  35. [35]

    Barrow holographic dark energy with Granda-Oliveros cut-off

    A. Oliveros, M. A. Sabogal, M. A. Acero, Barrow holographic dark energy with Granda–Oliveros cutoff, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137 (7) (2022) 783. arXiv:2203.14464, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02991-8

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02991-8 2022

  36. [36]

    Amendola, R

    L. Amendola, R. Gannouji, D. Polarski, S. Tsujikawa, Conditions for the cosmological viability of f(r) dark energy models, Physical Review D 75 (2007) 083504. arXiv:gr-qc/0612180, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.75.083504

    Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.75.083504 2007

  37. [37]

    Solar system tests of f(R) gravity

    J.-Q. Guo, Solar system tests of f(r) gravity, International Journal of Modern Physics D 23 (4) (2014) 1450036. arXiv: 1306.1853, doi:10.1142/S0218271814500369

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218271814500369 2014