Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Context-Aware Testing: A New Paradigm for Model Testing with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2410.24005 v1 pith:DKNY3Q2L submitted 2024-10-31 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords testingmodelsdatafailuresmodelparadigmcontext-awaredata-only
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The predominant de facto paradigm of testing ML models relies on either using only held-out data to compute aggregate evaluation metrics or by assessing the performance on different subgroups. However, such data-only testing methods operate under the restrictive assumption that the available empirical data is the sole input for testing ML models, disregarding valuable contextual information that could guide model testing. In this paper, we challenge the go-to approach of data-only testing and introduce context-aware testing (CAT) which uses context as an inductive bias to guide the search for meaningful model failures. We instantiate the first CAT system, SMART Testing, which employs large language models to hypothesize relevant and likely failures, which are evaluated on data using a self-falsification mechanism. Through empirical evaluations in diverse settings, we show that SMART automatically identifies more relevant and impactful failures than alternatives, demonstrating the potential of CAT as a testing paradigm.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantifying perturbation impacts for large language models

    cs.LG 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DBPA treats LLM perturbation analysis as a hypothesis test on pairwise cosine similarities of sampled outputs, yielding p-values and effect sizes.

  2. Active Task Disambiguation with LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Selecting clarifying questions by estimated information gain over sampled solutions outperforms implicit question generation for LLM task disambiguation.

Pith tools