REVIEW 2 cited by
Context-Aware Testing: A New Paradigm for Model Testing with Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The predominant de facto paradigm of testing ML models relies on either using only held-out data to compute aggregate evaluation metrics or by assessing the performance on different subgroups. However, such data-only testing methods operate under the restrictive assumption that the available empirical data is the sole input for testing ML models, disregarding valuable contextual information that could guide model testing. In this paper, we challenge the go-to approach of data-only testing and introduce context-aware testing (CAT) which uses context as an inductive bias to guide the search for meaningful model failures. We instantiate the first CAT system, SMART Testing, which employs large language models to hypothesize relevant and likely failures, which are evaluated on data using a self-falsification mechanism. Through empirical evaluations in diverse settings, we show that SMART automatically identifies more relevant and impactful failures than alternatives, demonstrating the potential of CAT as a testing paradigm.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Quantifying perturbation impacts for large language models
DBPA treats LLM perturbation analysis as a hypothesis test on pairwise cosine similarities of sampled outputs, yielding p-values and effect sizes.
-
Active Task Disambiguation with LLMs
Selecting clarifying questions by estimated information gain over sampled solutions outperforms implicit question generation for LLM task disambiguation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.