Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Dissipative preparation and stabilization of d-mode multinomial cat states

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Engineered dissipation prepares and stabilizes two-mode binomial cat states from vacuum, extending their lifetimes by orders of magnitude.

desk verdict Clean multi-jump construction that finally stabilizes compact su(2)/su(d) binomial cats from vacuum; theory and numerics hold, circuit residual-Kerr caveat is real but secondary. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.03302 v1 pith:DQPV4KJJ submitted 2026-07-03 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hall

S. Zhao , A. Metelmann This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hall PACS 03.65.Yz42.50.Dv03.67.Pp85.25.Cp
keywords dissipativeengineeringbinomialcatstatesmultimodesu(2)coherentLindbladjumpoperatorsbosonicquantumerrorcorrectionmetrologysuperconductingcircuits
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows how to design a small set of dissipative jump operators so that compact multimode cat states become the unique pure steady states of an open bosonic system. Starting from vacuum, the dynamics autonomously steer the system into two-mode binomial cat states (and their d-mode multinomial generalizations) while continuously correcting photon loss and dephasing. Because these states live in a finite-dimensional su(2) (or su(d)) manifold, ordinary ladder-operator methods fail; the new construction therefore uses one jump operator that locks the total excitation number and a second that freezes the relative phase structure inside that manifold. Numerical simulations demonstrate high-fidelity preparation and two-to-three-order-of-magnitude extensions of both bit-flip and phase-flip times. The same operators also keep the states useful for Heisenberg-limited metrology and bosonic quantum error correction. A concrete superconducting-circuit realization using an ATS coupler and lossy auxiliary resonators is outlined, and the scheme scales without requiring higher-order nonlinearities as the number of modes grows.

What carries the argument

The pair of jump operators L_{1}^{+} ∼ a†(J_c − N) and L_{2} ∼ a^{2} ± b^{2} (and their d-mode extensions). Together they annihilate only the target cat manifold, turning dissipation into an autonomous stabilizer that both prepares the states from vacuum and protects them against noise.

What would settle it

A circuit-QED experiment that implements the two engineered dissipators and measures the steady-state fidelity of the two-mode binomial cat state (or the associated T1/T2 lifetimes) as a function of engineered rates versus single-photon loss; if the fidelity remains near unity and lifetimes grow by the predicted factors, the claim holds; if residual Kerr or incomplete elimination of the auxiliaries destroy the null space, fidelity collapses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A pair of engineered Lindblad jump operators—L_{1}^{+} ∼ a†(a†a + b†b − N) that confines the system to total excitation N, and L_{2} ∼ a^{2} ± b^{2} that freezes the relative binomial structure—makes the even and odd two-mode binomial cat states the unique pure steady states of the open-system dynamics. The same principle generalizes immediately to d-mode multinomial cat states of su(d) algebras.

Load-bearing premise

That auxiliary lossy resonators can be adiabatically eliminated and all residual Kerr and cross-Kerr terms generated by the nonlinear coupler can be made off-resonant so they do not open extra error channels that spoil the engineered null space.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a dissipative engineering scheme for preparing and stabilizing compact multinomial cat states associated with su(d) algebras in multimode bosonic systems. For the two-mode (su(2)) case, the authors construct a pair of jump operators L1+ ~ a†(a†a + b†b − N) and L2 ~ a^{2} ± b^{2} that annihilate the even/odd two-mode binomial cat states, making them pure steady states of the ideal Lindblad dynamics. Starting from vacuum, numerical master-equation simulations show high-fidelity preparation and, under realistic single-photon loss and dephasing, lifetime extensions of T1 and T2 by two-to-three orders of magnitude. The construction is generalized to d-mode multinomial cats (Table I), an ATS-based superconducting circuit realization is outlined (Appendix D), and applications to Heisenberg-limited metrology and autonomous bit-flip protection of a logical qubit are discussed.

Significance. If the ideal Lindblad claim holds and residual circuit nonlinearities remain controllable, the work supplies a scalable route to dissipatively prepare and stabilize compact multimode cats that admit exact Knill–Laflamme conditions, complementing existing non-compact (Schrödinger and pair-cat) schemes. The algebraic construction is clean, the numerics are consistent with the claimed null-space structure, and the lifetime-extension and metrology results are concrete and falsifiable. The circuit proposal, while idealized, is grounded in existing ATS/SNAIL technology and therefore of direct interest to the circuit-QED community.

major comments (2)
  1. Appendix D and the RWA leading to Eq. (20): the claim that multi-tone flux biasing renders all residual Kerr/cross-Kerr and higher-order terms non-resonant (or dynamically inert under strong κc,d) is load-bearing for the practical stabilization claim. The manuscript shows that the desired terms can be made resonant, but does not quantify residual detunings, AC-Stark shifts, or the size of off-resonant leakage relative to κ1,2 and the noise rates used in Figs. 2–5. A short estimate of residual error rates (or a numerical master equation that retains the leading residual terms) is needed to confirm that the engineered null space survives at the parameter values required for the reported lifetime gains.
  2. Sec. III and Table I (cases 7, 9): uniqueness of the pure steady-state manifold is asserted for the ideal jump operators, yet the argument is mainly that the cats lie in the joint kernel. For finite N and with only L1+ (no complementary L1−), the dynamics from vacuum reach the target, but the manuscript does not rigorously exclude other pure or mixed steady states that could appear once single-photon loss or dephasing is present. A brief spectral or projector argument (extending Appendix E) clarifying uniqueness under the full set of engineered dissipators would strengthen the central claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. Abstract and throughout: several typos (“techonologies”, “computating”, “interrogating times”) should be corrected.
  2. Fig. 1(b): the spherical Wigner plot is hard to read; the 2-D projection helps, but a clearer color scale or an additional cut would improve accessibility.
  3. Eq. (11) and surrounding text: the choice ξ = i versus ξ = 1 for the sign in L2 is stated but the corresponding cat-state phase conventions could be made more explicit for the reader.
  4. Table I: the parity constraints m, nd ∈ {even, odd} are important; a one-sentence reminder in the caption would help.
  5. Sec. IV A: the q-index argument is correct but terse; a short explicit evaluation of the double commutator (already in Appendix B) could be cross-referenced more clearly in the main text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: jump operators are constructed by design to annihilate the target cats, uniqueness follows from an external theorem, and lifetime claims are independent numerics.

full rationale

The paper's central construction (Secs. III, Table I) deliberately chooses ladder-type jump operators L_{1}^{+} ∼ a†(J_c − N) and L_{2} ∼ a^{2} ± b^{2} (and d-mode generalizations) so that the two-mode binomial / multinomial cats lie in their joint kernel; this is the standard dissipative-engineering procedure, not a claim that an independent dynamical principle 'predicts' the cats. Algebraic verification that the operators annihilate the states follows directly from the known action of a, b on su(2) coherent states (Eqs. 13–16, 22–28) and does not recycle a fitted or self-defined quantity. Uniqueness of the pure steady state is imported from the external theorem of Kraus et al. [6], not from a self-citation. Preparation fidelities (Figs. 2–3), lifetime extensions T_{1}/T_{2} (Fig. 5), and metrological sensitivity (Fig. 6) are obtained by independent numerical integration of the resulting Lindblad equation; no parameters are fitted to data and then re-presented as predictions. The circuit realization (App. D) and adiabatic-elimination argument (App. C) are implementation details that do not feed back into the algebraic claim. Self-citations (e.g., [73] for adiabatic elimination) are standard technical tools and are not load-bearing for the uniqueness or stabilization results. Consequently the derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard open-system Lindblad framework, the Schwinger representation of su(2), and the adiabatic-elimination approximation for lossy auxiliaries. Free parameters are the usual rates and the integer N that sets cat size; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • N (total excitation number / cat size)
    Integer chosen by hand; controls both macroscopicity and the scaling of engineered vs. noise rates. Results are shown for N = 3–15.
  • κ1, κ2 (engineered jump rates)
    Set equal to 1 in most plots; absolute scale is free and only ratios to noise rates matter.
  • γa, γb, γϕ (noise rates)
    Chosen as 0.03κ for the lifetime and metrology figures; representative but not measured.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Open-system evolution is accurately described by a Markovian Lindblad master equation with the listed jump operators.
    Invoked throughout Sec. III and Appendices C–E; standard for circuit-QED reservoir engineering but neglects non-Markovian corrections.
  • standard math The two-mode bosonic operators realize the su(2) algebra inside a fixed-N subspace (Schwinger representation).
    Eqs. (2) and (5); textbook.
  • domain assumption Auxiliary resonators remain near vacuum and can be adiabatically eliminated, yielding pure dissipators with rates 4g²/κ.
    Appendix C; standard Born–Markov treatment.
  • ad hoc to paper Unwanted Kerr and cross-Kerr terms generated by the ATS can be rendered non-resonant by multi-tone flux drives and RWA.
    Appendix D; the frequency-matching conditions (21) are engineered specifically for this circuit.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dissipative preparation and stabilization of d-mode multinomial cat states." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DQPV4KJJ

@misc{pith2026260703302,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dissipative preparation and stabilization of d-mode multinomial cat states},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DQPV4KJJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.03302}
}
abstract

Engineering dissipation with tailored steady states has become a powerful approach for preparing and stabilizing quantum states. In this framework, engineered dissipative processes continuously steer a system towards desired target states while suppressing unwanted noise. However, extending this idea to multimode systems is challenging and remains largely unexplored, although this class of states is a powerful resource for quantum sensing and quantum information processing applications. Here, we propose a general method to design the required dissipative processes for the generation of multimode cat states in bosonic systems. We show that the engineered dissipation prepares such states from the vacuum with high fidelity and robustly stabilizes them against decoherence. As a result, their lifetime is extended by several orders of magnitude compared to natural decay times, which in turn enhances their applications in quantum techonologies. We specifically focus on the preparation and stabilization of two-mode binomial cat states and discuss a pathway for the implementation in superconducting circuit. However, our scheme can also scale up to arbitrary d-mode multinomial cat states associated to $\mathfrak{su}(d\ge2)$ algebras, and thus, our scalable framework provides a feasible route towards stabilizing compact nonclassical states.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03302 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1: Wigner distribution of different types of cat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2: Evolution from the initial vacuum state [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3: Fidelity evolutions of a system initialized [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Illustration of four superconducting LC res [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Decay of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: Open-system simulation of the normalized sen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Sketch of ATS taken from [30]. The ATS consists [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8: Fidelity of the dissipatively prepared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    + ˆG ˆd† ˆd (D23) where ˆG = 2EJ ϕaϕcϕ2 d(ϵ1ˆa†ˆc†+ ϵ∗ 1ˆaˆc). We observe that the first term is essentially a shift in the resonance fre- quencies of the resonators, which can be easily eliminated by initially choosing a slightly different rotating frame with the detuned frequencies ω′ ●, e.g., ω′ a = ωa−EL,bϕ2 a. The second term effectively behaves as t...

  2. [2]

    strength

    In the presence of an unwanted noise source√γ′ˆL′, we may denote its Lindblad equation as d dt ˆρ(t) = [κ1 ˆD( ˆL1)+ κ2 ˆD( ˆL2) ⌟⟨⟨⟪rl⟫l⟩⟩⟪⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫mo⟨⌟⟪⟨⟨⟪rl⟫...

  3. [3]

    J. F. Poyatos, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Physical Review Letters 77, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.4728 (1996)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.4728 1996

  4. [4]

    M. B. Plenio and S. F. Huelga, Physical Review Letters 88, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.197901 (2002)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.197901 2002

  5. [5]

    Kraus and J

    B. Kraus and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review Letters 92, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.013602 (2004)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.013602 2004

  6. [6]

    S. O. Valenzuela, W. D. Oliver, D. M. Berns, K. K. Berggren, L. S. Levitov, and T. P. Orlando, Science 314, 10.1126/science.1134008 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1134008 2006

  7. [7]

    A. S. Parkins, E. Solano, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review Letters 96, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.053602 (2006)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.96.053602 2006

  8. [9]

    Verstraete, M

    F. Verstraete, M. M. Wolf, and J. Ignacio Cirac, Nature Phys 5, 10.1038/nphys1342 (2009)

    doi:10.1038/nphys1342 2009

Show all 69 references
  1. [10]

    C. A. Muschik, E. S. Polzik, and J. I. Cirac, Physical Review A 83, 10.1103/PhysRevA.83.052312 (2011)

    2011 doi

  2. [11]

    Krauter, C

    H. Krauter, C. A. Muschik, K. Jensen, W. Wasilewski, J. M. Petersen, J. I. Cirac, and E. S. Polzik, Physical Review Letters 107, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.080503 (2011)

    2011 doi

  3. [12]

    Mirrahimi, Z

    M. Mirrahimi, Z. Leghtas, V. V. Albert, S. Touzard, R. J. Schoelkopf, L. Jiang, and M. H. Devoret, New J. Phys. 16, 10.1088/1367-2630/16/4/045014 (2014)

    2014 doi

  4. [13]

    Kapit, Quantum Sci

    E. Kapit, Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 10.1088/2058- 9565/aa7e5d (2017)

    doi

  5. [14]

    V. V. Albert, S. O. Mundhada, A. Grimm, S. Touzard, M. H. Devoret, and L. Jiang, Quantum Sci. Technol. 4, 10.1088/2058-9565/ab1e69 (2019)

    doi

  6. [15]

    Doucet, F

    E. Doucet, F. Reiter, L. Ranzani, and A. Kamal, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023370 (2020)

    2020 doi

  7. [16]

    V. V. Albert, Lindbladians with multiple steady states: Theory and applications (2018), arXiv:1802.00010 [quant-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Nigro, J

    D. Nigro, J. Stat. Mech. 2019, 10.1088/1742- 5468/ab0c1c (2019)

    2019 doi

  9. [18]

    B. M. Fernengel and B. Drossel, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 56, 10.1088/1751-8121/acee35 (2023)

    2023 doi

  10. [19]

    V. V. Albert and L. Jiang, Phys. Rev. A 89, 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.022118 (2014)

    2014 doi

  11. [21]

    M. J. Kastoryano, M. M. Wolf, and J. Eisert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.110501 (2013)

    2013 doi

  12. [22]

    Marshall, L

    J. Marshall, L. Campos Venuti, and P. Zanardi, Phys. Rev. A 94, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052339 (2016)

    2016 doi

  13. [23]

    P. M. Harrington, E. J. Mueller, and K. W. Murch, Nat Rev Phys 4, 10.1038/s42254-022-00494-8 (2022)

    2022 doi

  14. [24]

    K. W. Murch, U. Vool, D. Zhou, S. J. Weber, S. M. Girvin, and I. Siddiqi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.183602 (2012)

    2012 doi

  15. [25]

    Hacohen-Gourgy, V

    S. Hacohen-Gourgy, V. V. Ramasesh, C. De Grandi, I. Siddiqi, and S. M. Girvin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.240501 (2015)

    2015 doi

  16. [26]

    Maurya, H

    V. Maurya, H. Zhang, D. Kowsari, A. Kuo, D. M. Hartsell, C. Miyamoto, J. Liu, S. Shanto, E. Vlachos, A. Zarassi, K. W. Murch, and E. M. Levenson-Falk, PRX Quantum 5, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.5.020321 (2024)

    2024 doi

  17. [28]

    C. P. Koch, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 28, 10.1088/0953- 8984/28/21/213001 (2016)

    2016 doi

  18. [29]

    K. P. Horn, F. Reiter, Y. Lin, D. Leibfried, and 20 C. P. Koch, New J. Phys. 20, 10.1088/1367-2630/aaf360 (2018)

    2018 doi

  19. [30]

    R´ eglade, A

    U. R´ eglade, A. Bocquet, R. Gautier, J. Cohen, A. Marquet, E. Albertinale, N. Pankratova, M. Hall´ en, F. Rautschke, L.-A. Sellem, P. Rouchon, A. Sarlette, M. Mirrahimi, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, R. Lescanne, S. Je- zouin, and Z. Leghtas, Nature 629, 10.1038/s41586-024- 07294-3 (2024)

    2024 doi

  20. [31]

    Marquet, A

    A. Marquet, A. Essig, J. Cohen, N. Cottet, A. Murani, E. Albertinale, S. Dupouy, A. Bienfait, T. Peronnin, S. Jezouin, R. Lescanne, and B. Huard, Phys. Rev. X 14, 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021019 (2024)

    2024 doi

  21. [32]

    Lescanne, M

    R. Lescanne, M. Villiers, T. Peronnin, A. Sarlette, M. Delbecq, B. Huard, T. Kontos, M. Mirrahimi, and Z. Leghtas, Nature Physics16, 10.1038/s41567-020-0824- x (2020)

    2020 doi

  22. [34]

    Leghtas, S

    Z. Leghtas, S. Touzard, I. M. Pop, A. Kou, B. Vlastakis, A. Petrenko, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, S. Shankar, M. J. Ha- tridge, M. Reagor, L. Frunzio, R. J. Schoelkopf, M. Mir- rahimi, and M. H. Devoret, Science 347, 10.1126/sci- ence.aaa2085 (2015)

    2015 doi

  23. [36]

    Kienzler, H.-Y

    D. Kienzler, H.-Y. Lo, B. Keitch, L. de Clercq, F. Le- upold, F. Lindenfelser, M. Marinelli, V. Negnevitsky, and J. P. Home, Science347, 10.1126/science.1261033 (2015)

    2015 doi

  24. [37]

    E. E. Wollman, C. U. Lei, A. J. Weinstein, J. Suh, A. Kronwald, F. Marquardt, A. A. Clerk, and K. C. Schwab, Science 349, 10.1126/science.aac5138 (2015)

    2015 doi

  25. [38]

    Mamaev, L

    M. Mamaev, L. C. G. Govia, and A. A. Clerk, Quantum 2, 10.22331/q-2018-03-27-58 (2018)

    2018 doi

  26. [39]

    Zapletal, A

    P. Zapletal, A. Nunnenkamp, and M. Brunelli, PRX Quantum 3, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010301 (2022)

    2022 doi

  27. [40]

    J. M. Gertler, S. van Geldern, S. Shirol, L. Jiang, and C. Wang, PRX Quantum 4, 10.1103/PRXQuan- tum.4.020319 (2023)

    2023 doi

  28. [41]

    V. V. Albert, K. Noh, K. Duivenvoorden, D. J. Young, R. T. Brierley, P. Reinhold, C. Vuillot, L. Li, C. Shen, S. M. Girvin, B. M. Terhal, and L. Jiang, Physical Review A 97, 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.032346 (2018)

    2018 doi

  29. [42]

    A. M. Perelomov, Commun.Math. Phys. 26, 10.1007/BF01645091 (1972)

    1972 doi

  30. [43]

    Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986)

    A. Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986)

    1986

  31. [44]

    Bergmann and P

    M. Bergmann and P. van Loock, Phys. Rev. A 94, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.012311 (2016)

    2016 doi

  32. [45]

    Knill, R

    E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and L. Viola, Physical Review Letters 84, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2525 (2000)

    2000 doi

  33. [46]

    Maleki and A

    Y. Maleki and A. M. Zheltikov, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, JOSAB 37, 10.1364/JOSAB.374221 (2020)

    2020 doi

  34. [47]

    N. E. Frattini, U. Vool, S. Shankar, A. Narla, K. M. Sliwa, and M. H. Devoret, Applied Physics Letters 110, 10.1063/1.4984142 (2017)

    2017 doi

  35. [49]

    B. J. Chapman, S. J. de Graaf, S. H. Xue, Y. Zhang, J. Teoh, J. C. Curtis, T. Tsunoda, A. Eickbusch, A. P. Read, A. Koottandavida, S. O. Mundhada, L. Frunzio, M. Devoret, S. Girvin, and R. Schoelkopf, PRX Quantum 4, 10.1103/PRXQuantum.4.020355 (2023)

    2023 doi

  36. [50]

    Bonifacio, D

    R. Bonifacio, D. M. Kim, and M. O. Scully, Phys. Rev. 187, 10.1103/PhysRev.187.441 (1969)

    1969 doi

  37. [51]

    J. M. Radcliffe, J. Phys. A: Gen. Phys. 4, 10.1088/0305- 4470/4/3/009 (1971)

    1971 doi

  38. [52]

    Dooley and T

    S. Dooley and T. P. Spiller, Phys. Rev. A 90, 10.1103/PhysRevA.90.012320 (2014)

    2014 doi

  39. [53]

    Barzanjeh and D

    S. Barzanjeh and D. Vitali, Phys. Rev. A 93, 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.033846 (2016)

    2016 doi

  40. [54]

    A. B. Klimov and S. M. Chumakov, A Group-Theoretical Approach to Quantum Optics: Models of Atom-Field In- teractions (John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

    2009

  41. [55]

    J. J. Sakurai and J. Napolitano, Modern quantum me- chanics (2020)

    2020

  42. [56]

    Maleki, The European Physical Journal Plus 136, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02020-8 (2021)

    Y. Maleki, The European Physical Journal Plus 136, 10.1140/epjp/s13360-021-02020-8 (2021)

    2021 doi

  43. [57]

    Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol

    J.-P. Serre, Linear Representations of Finite Groups , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Vol. 42 (Springer, New York, NY, 1977)

    1977

  44. [59]

    Reiter, A

    F. Reiter, A. S. Sørensen, P. Zoller, and C. A. Muschik, Nat Commun 8, 10.1038/s41467-017-01895-5 (2017)

    2017 doi

  45. [60]

    Winter, Energy-constrained diamond norm with ap- plications to the uniform continuity of continuous vari- able channel capacities (2017)

    A. Winter, Energy-constrained diamond norm with ap- plications to the uniform continuity of continuous vari- able channel capacities (2017)

    2017

  46. [61]

    M. E. Shirokov, Matematicheskii Sbornik 211, 10.4213/sm9336 (2020)

    2020 doi

  47. [62]

    Becker, N

    S. Becker, N. Datta, M. G. Jabbour, and M. E. Shirokov, Optimal continuity bound for the von neumann entropy under energy constraints (2025)

    2025

  48. [63]

    Bergeal, R

    N. Bergeal, R. Vijay, V. E. Manucharyan, I. Siddiqi, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Nature Physics 6, 10.1038/nphys1516 (2010)

    2010 doi

  49. [64]

    Bergeal, F

    N. Bergeal, F. Schackert, M. Metcalfe, R. Vijay, V. E. Manucharyan, L. Frunzio, D. E. Prober, R. J. Schoelkopf, S. M. Girvin, and M. H. Devoret, Nature 465, 10.1038/nature09035 (2010)

    2010 doi

  50. [65]

    Mathur and D

    M. Mathur and D. Sen, Journal of Mathematical Physics 42, 10.1063/1.1385563 (2001)

    2001 doi

  51. [66]

    D. A. Rower, K. Hida, L. Ateshian, H. Zhang, J. An, M. Hays, S. E. Muschinske, C. M. McNally, S. C. Alipour- Fard, R. Assouly, I. T. Rosen, B. M. Niedzielski, M. E. Schwartz, K. Serniak, J. A. Grover, and W. D. Oliver, Physical Review A 111, 10.1103/PhysRevA.111.032420 (2025)

    2025 doi

  52. [67]

    Choi and R

    Y. Choi and R. Joynt, npj Quantum Information 8, 10.1038/s41534-022-00576-6 (2022)

    2022 doi

  53. [68]

    Just out of the lab: A cat qubit that jumps every hour (2025)

    2025

  54. [69]

    Shimizu and T

    A. Shimizu and T. Morimae, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.090401 (2005)

    2005 doi

  55. [70]

    Tatsuta, Y

    M. Tatsuta, Y. Matsuzaki, and A. Shimizu, Phys. Rev. A 100, 10.1103/PhysRevA.100.032318 (2019)

    2019 doi

  56. [71]

    J. D. Teoh, P. Winkel, H. K. Babla, B. J. Chapman, J. Claes, S. J. de Graaf, J. W. O. Garmon, W. D. Kalfus, Y. Lu, A. Maiti, K. Sahay, N. Thakur, T. Tsunoda, S. H. Xue, L. Frunzio, S. M. Girvin, S. Puri, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences 1...

    2023 doi

  57. [73]

    L. Sun, A. Petrenko, Z. Leghtas, B. Vlastakis, G. Kirch- mair, K. M. Sliwa, A. Narla, M. Hatridge, S. Shankar, J. Blumoff, L. Frunzio, M. Mirrahimi, M. H. Devoret, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Nature 511, 10.1038/nature13436 21 (2014)

    2014 doi

  58. [74]

    Hillmann and F

    T. Hillmann and F. Quijandr´ ıa, Phys. Rev. A 107, 10.1103/PhysRevA.107.032423 (2023)

    2023 doi

  59. [75]

    B. D. Hauer, A. Metelmann, and J. P. Davis, Phys. Rev. A 98, 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.043804 (2018)

    2018 doi

  60. [76]

    Popkov, S

    V. Popkov, S. Essink, C. Presilla, and G. Sch¨ utz, Physical Review A 98, 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.052110 (2018)

    2018 doi

  61. [77]

    Zanardi, Physical Review Letters 113, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.113.240406 (2014)

    P. Zanardi, Physical Review Letters 113, 10.1103/Phys- RevLett.113.240406 (2014)

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.