Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

This paper develops exact analytic formulas for the three-point function of primordial perturbations in two-field inflation, resumming curvature–isocurvature mixing to all orders in the mixing strength λ.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 01:48 UTC pith:DRC7MV2Q

load-bearing objection Exact integral representations and the weak-mixing recovery are solid, but the advertised strong-mixing bispectrum enhancement is only an upper-bound conjecture, not a proven scaling law. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2607.14529 v2 pith:DRC7MV2Q submitted 2026-07-16 astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th

Pushing the Primordial Frontier: Cosmological Collider Signatures at Strong Mixing

Javier Huenupi , Claudio Mu\~noz , Gonzalo A. Palma , Spyros Sypsas This is my paper
classification astro-ph.CO gr-qchep-phhep-th MSC 83F05 PACS 98.80.Cq98.80.-k
keywords primordial non-Gaussianitymultifield inflationcosmological colliderquasi-single-field inflationisocurvature perturbationsSchwinger–Keldysh formalismbispectrum squeezed limitstrong mixing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper aims to put primordial non-Gaussianity calculations in two-field inflation on a nonperturbative footing. Where previous treatments expanded the curvature–isocurvature mixing strength λ as a small parameter, the authors incorporate the mixing exactly into the linear mode functions, resumming transfer between curvature and isocurvature perturbations to all orders in λ. They derive exact integral representations for the tree-level bispectra generated by the three cubic interactions σ(Dtζ)², σ²Dtζ, and σ³, and extract the squeezed limit in closed form: the nonanalytic scaling r^{1/2±ν} (with ν set by the entropy mass) and, for heavy fields, logarithmic oscillations with frequency ρ ln(kS/kL). In the strong-mixing regime, where transfer perturbation theory breaks down, both the power spectrum and bispectrum receive nonperturbative enhancements with specific scaling laws in λ. If correct, this gives a nonperturbative completion of the quasi-single-field and cosmological-collider calculations and opens strongly mixed multifield inflation to analytic study.

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the tree-level bispectrum of curvature perturbations in two-field inflation with constant curvature–isocurvature mixing λ admits exact formulas valid for arbitrary λ and entropy mass μ. The authors obtain exact linear mode solutions, build dressed Schwinger–Keldysh propagators, and derive exact integral representations for the bispectra from σ(Dtζ)², σ²Dtζ, and σ³. For light entropy mass (0<μ/H<3/2) the leading squeezed limit is S ∝ Σ± C±(λ,ν) r^{½±ν}; for heavy mass (ν=iρ) it becomes r^{½} C(λ,ρ) sin(ρ ln(kS/kL)+φ), with ν and ρ fixed purely by μ/H and coefficients C± nonperturbative in λ. In the strong-mixing regime the exact power sp

What carries the argument

The mass-dressing operator bD^{(w)}_ν = ₂F₁(½−ν, ½+ν; 1+iwλ; (i/2)d/dz), which acts on the conformally coupled (ν=½) seed solutions to produce exact mode functions at any entropy mass. This hypergeometric operator solves the fourth-order equation controlling the Bogoliubov coefficients; for half-integer ν it reduces to repeated action of the raising operators of an sl(2) ladder. Its integral representation turns the Schwinger–Keldysh time integrals into finite-dimensional integrals over hypergeometric dressing functions, from which the squeezed-limit asymptotics are extracted by a large-t ~ r^{-1} region expansion.

Load-bearing premise

That λ, μ/H, and slow-roll parameters are exactly constant over the time scales that dominate the bispectrum integrals, so the 'exact' solutions apply to the real, time-evolving inflationary background; the paper gives no quantitative bound on how slow these parameters must change.

What would settle it

Compute the squeezed three-point function numerically in a two-field model with a large but finite turning rate (λ≳1) and compare the amplitude and scaling to Eqs. (240)-(255): if the r^{1/2−ν} exponent shifts, the oscillation frequency departs from ρ=√(μ²/H²−9/4), or the λ-dependence deviates from the e^{πλ}/λ^p bounds, then the constant-mixing truncation is failing. A lattice or moment-based simulation with time-dependent λ and μ would directly test whether the constant-parameter prediction survives in a realistic background.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Recovers, as λ→0, the standard quasi-single-field and cosmological-collider squeezed limits, so the new formulas reduce to known results in the weak-mixing regime.
  • Shows the nonanalytic squeezed exponents r^{1/2±ν} (light) and the oscillation frequency ρ (heavy) are set by μ alone, sharpening the interpretation of cosmological-collider signals.
  • Predicts strong enhancement of both the power spectrum (∝ e^{πλ}/λ) and the reduced bispectrum (upper bounds ∝ e^{πλ}/λ²..λ⁴) when λ≫1, even as m_eff² = μ² − λ²H² changes sign.
  • Establishes an analytic framework for computing loop corrections and higher-point correlators in strongly mixed models, and for primordial-black-hole production scenarios where λ is large.
  • Identifies which covariant cubic couplings (α, β, γ) control which squeezed branches, allowing template searches for each interaction separately.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural next step, not pursued here, is to find a boundary (correlator-level) analogue of the dressing operator; if one exists, the exact resummed shapes might be derivable from recursion relations without time integrals.
  • The constant-λ, constant-μ truncation is the main practical limitation; realistic turning trajectories have time-dependent λ, so a quantitative slow-mixing consistency condition (similar to slow-roll) would be needed to apply the formulas to actual models.
  • For degenerate masses where 2ν is an integer, logarithms are expected; one could test numerically whether the strong-mixing bounds are saturated at these special masses, since the uniform expansion was only carried to leading order.
  • The nonperturbative enhancement may be observable with future surveys: a strongly mixed signal would be distinguishable from weakly mixed ones by the mass-set oscillation frequency and by the λ-scaling of the amplitude ratio.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops an analytic, nonperturbative-in-λ treatment of the two-field inflationary system with constant curvature–isocurvature mixing. It constructs exact linear solutions through a Bogoliubov decomposition, a fourth-order equation, and hypergeometric dressing operators, then uses these to build dressed Schwinger–Keldysh propagators. From these it derives exact integral representations for the tree-level bispectra generated by the three cubic interactions σ(D_tζ)^2, σ^2D_tζ, and σ^3, and extracts squeezed-limit shapes with nonanalytic powers r^{1/2±ν} and, for heavy fields, logarithmic oscillations. The paper claims to recover known quasi-single-field and cosmological-collider results in the weak-mixing limit, and reports strong-mixing nonperturbative scaling laws for the power spectrum and bispectrum. The main technical novelty is the resummation of curvature–isocurvature transfer to all orders in the mixing strength λ for constant parameters.

Significance. If correct, this is a valuable nonperturbative completion of the quasi-single-field/cosmological-collider calculation in the strongly mixed regime, and the algebraic structure relating conformally coupled seeds to general masses via an sl(2) ladder is interesting in its own right. The exact integral representations for the three bispectra, the recovery of the exact power spectrum, and the dressed-propagator formalism are concrete technical contributions that go beyond the usual perturbative-in-λ treatments. However, two of the headline claims are not currently supported by the presented calculation: the weak-mixing recovery is asserted but not derived, and the strong-mixing bispectrum scalings are explicitly only upper bounds, not established asymptotic equalities. These gaps prevent the paper from fully delivering its advertised conclusions, though they appear addressable within the manuscript's scope.

major comments (4)
  1. [§X.E, Eqs. (281)–(287)] The abstract and conclusions advertise 'distinctive nonperturbative scaling laws' for the strongly mixed bispectrum, but the derivation in §X.E establishes only that c_{α,±}=O(e^{3πλ}/λ^6), c_{β,±}=O(e^{3πλ}/λ^5), c_{γ,±}=O(e^{3πλ}/λ^4), with the explicit caveat that 'these expressions should be understood as upper bounds rather than established asymptotic equalities.' Nothing in the analysis excludes further cancellations at the next order of the 1/λ expansion; if such cancellations occur, the shapes could be exponentially suppressed rather than enhanced. This is a load-bearing distinction: the strong-mixing enhancement is one of the paper's central phenomenological claims. Please either carry the uniform expansion to the next order and establish saturation, or revise the abstract and conclusions to state the result as an upper bound.
  2. [§IX–§X] The paper repeatedly states that in the weak-mixing limit the expressions reproduce the familiar quasi-single-field and cosmological-collider results (e.g., Abstract, §I, §XI). However, I could not find a derivation of this limit anywhere in the manuscript. The squeezed-limit coefficients c_{α,±}, c_{β,±}, c_{γ,±} defined in Eqs. (241), (249), and (256) are not expanded for λ→0, and no comparison is made with the known QSF/collider bispectra. Since this recovery is the main consistency check for the whole formalism, it should be shown explicitly, at least in an appendix. Without it, the claim of validation rests on assertion.
  3. [§III.B, Eqs. (45), (49)–(51)] The fourth-order equation (45) and the reconstruction operators (46)–(51) are load-bearing: they underlie the mode functions, the dressed propagators, and all subsequent bispectrum results. The text states that 'the derivation relies on recurrence relations' but does not provide the elimination or the verification. For a paper whose central claim is an exact analytic solution, these steps should be derivable or at least checkable within the manuscript. Please include an appendix giving the elimination from Eq. (34), or an explicit verification that (45)–(51) are consistent with the first-order system and initial conditions.
  4. [§II, around Eq. (10)] The exact treatment assumes strictly constant λ, constant μ/H, and neglects slow-roll time dependence of ϵ and the other parameters. This is stated, but no quantitative consistency condition is given for when the constant-parameter approximation is valid for realistic turning trajectories. Since the abstract and conclusions frame the results as opening a window onto multifield inflation and PBH/collider phenomenology, the domain of validity should be quantified, e.g., by estimating corrections proportional to λ̇/Hλ, μ̇/(Hμ), and ϵ̇/(Hϵ), or by showing that the leading time dependence cancels in the observables. Absent that, the phenomenological reach of the exact results is unclear.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§IX, Eq. (202)] The symbol K is used both for the total momentum vector and for the sum of momenta, and in Eq. (202) Ω(t) is defined with a notation that is not fully tied to the later form Ω=k_S(J_r+2rt). Please unify the notation to avoid confusion.
  2. [§III] The overbar notation for Bogoliubov partners is introduced with the warning that it does not denote complex conjugation. This is a common but potentially confusing convention; consider using a different symbol (e.g., tildes) or adding a summary table.
  3. [Figures 1–3] The left panels use color maps, but the captions do not describe the color scale or the numerical range. The solid black curve is identified as f_NL=0, but it is not clear what the dotted diagonal or the color levels represent quantitatively. Please add color-bar labels and a description of the plotting conventions.
  4. [References] References [11] and [14] appear to be the same paper (Adshead, Easther, Lim, 'The in-in formalism and cosmological perturbations'). Please consolidate or cite distinct works.
  5. [Note added] The note added mentions two independent works [111,112] that derive the squeezed limit of the bispectrum. Since these works are directly relevant to the paper's central claim, a brief comparison of the final coefficients or shapes would help the reader judge the level of agreement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the bispectrum derivation is self-contained from the quadratic action; self-citations are contextual, and the strong-mixing scalings are stated as upper bounds rather than as inputs.

full rationale

The paper's load-bearing derivation is self-contained. Sections III-VI re-derive the exact linear solutions of the coupled curvature-isocurvature system from the quadratic action (Eq. 10), rather than importing them unchanged from Ref. [96]; the power spectrum (Eqs. 145-147) is computed directly from the normalized mode functions. The dressed propagators and tree-level bispectra are then constructed from first principles in Sections VIII-IX, yielding exact integral representations (Eqs. 203, 209, 214) and squeezed-limit expressions (Eqs. 240, 248, 255). Self-citations to Refs. [96] and [100] provide motivation and a known reference for the Bogoliubov parametrization, but the needed steps are rederived in the text, so they are not load-bearing in the circularity sense. The weak-mixing limit is used only as a validation check, not to fit any parameter, and no quantity is fitted to data. The only flagged limitation is in Section X.E: the strong-mixing estimates (281)-(287) are explicitly stated as upper bounds, not established equalities (quoted: 'These expressions should be understood as upper bounds rather than established asymptotic equalities'). This is a gap between the abstract's wording and the proven asymptotic statement, and a correctness/strength-of-claim concern, but it is not circularity: the bounds are derived from the same exact integrals, not assumed as inputs. No pattern from the enumerated circularity kinds is present.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the chosen two-field action and the constant-parameter slow-roll truncation, on the Bunch-Davies vacuum assignment, on tree-level perturbation theory for the cubic vertices, and on standard special-function identities. No number is fitted to data and no new physical entity is invented; the dressing operator bDν(w) is a mathematical tool, not a new physical field.

axioms (6)
  • domain assumption Constant mixing strength λ, constant entropy mass μ/H, and leading-order slow roll.
    The quadratic action (10) and the equations of motion (12)-(13) treat λ, μ, and ϵ as time-independent; the 'exact' solutions are exact only for this truncated system.
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies vacuum with Kummer-sector Bogoliubov coefficients B_b^(w) set to zero.
    Section VI imposes initial conditions at z0 ≫ 1 by dropping O(z0^{-1}) terms and taking B_b^(w) → 0; this is standard but a specific vacuum choice.
  • domain assumption Tree-level approximation with the three cubic interactions in Eq. (3) assumed representative.
    The central claim concerns tree-level bispectra from σ(Dtζ)^2, σ^2 Dtζ, and σ^3; loops and other cubic operators are excluded.
  • standard math Method of regions isolates the nonanalytic r dependence in the squeezed limit.
    The extraction of the r^{1/2±ν} behavior from the auxiliary integrals relies on the standard method of regions, a widely used asymptotic technique.
  • ad hoc to paper Regular uniform expansion in inverse powers of λ in the strong-mixing limit.
    The bounds in Eqs. (281)-(283) are derived under the explicit assumption 'Assuming a regular uniform expansion in inverse powers of λ' (Section X.E); this is not proven.
  • standard math Properties of Hankel, Tricomi, and Kummer functions as collected in Appendix A.
    The derivations rely on standard hypergeometric identities, integral representations, and analytic continuations, which are standard mathematical results.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 37259 in / 12139 out tokens · 124499 ms · 2026-08-02T01:48:18.575456+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We develop an analytic treatment of primordial non-Gaussianity in multifield inflation that is nonperturbative in the constant curvature--isocurvature mixing strength $\lambda$. Using exact linear solutions for the coupled curvature perturbation $\zeta$ and isocurvature perturbation $\sigma$, we construct dressed propagators and derive exact integral representations for the tree-level bispectra generated by the interactions $\dot\zeta^2\sigma$, $\dot\zeta\,\sigma^2$, and $\sigma^3$. This formalism resums curvature--isocurvature transfer to all orders in $\lambda$ and applies for arbitrary values of the entropy mass $\mu$. We obtain closed-form expressions for the leading squeezed limit of the bispectrum contributions and recover the well-known cosmological-collider and quasi-single-field results in the weak-mixing limit. In the strong-mixing regime, where conventional transfer perturbation theory breaks down, we find that both the power spectrum and the bispectrum can be dramatically enhanced, giving rise to distinctive nonperturbative scaling laws for the reduced non-Gaussian amplitude. Together, these results open a new analytic window onto multifield inflation beyond the weak-coupling approximation and establish a framework for studying cosmological-collider signals, primordial-black-hole production, and loop corrections in strongly mixed inflationary dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.14529 by Claudio Mu\~noz, Gonzalo A. Palma, Javier Huenupi, Spyros Sypsas.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The normalized equilateral amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Normalized equilateral amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Normalized equilateral amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Dissecting the Scalar Cosmological Collider with the Cosmic Microwave Background

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 accept novelty 7.0

    A joint Bayesian fit of the multi-field inflationary Lagrangian to Planck bispectrum data finds no cosmological collider signal (max Δχ²=5.3) and shows weak-mixing template searches are invalid except at the smallest masses.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 96 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    The Inflationary Universe: A Possible So- lution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,

    A. H. Guth, “The Inflationary Universe: A Possible So- lution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems,” Phys. Rev. D23, 347-356 (1981)

    1981

  2. [2]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmo- logical Models Without Singularity,” Phys. Lett. B91, 99-102 (1980)

    1980

  3. [3]

    A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homo- geneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,

    A. D. Linde, “A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homo- geneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,” Phys. Lett. B108, 389-393 (1982)

    1982

  4. [4]

    Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,

    A. Albrecht and P. J. Steinhardt, “Cosmology for Grand Unified Theories with Radiatively Induced Symmetry Breaking,” Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1220-1223 (1982)

    1982

  5. [5]

    Inflation: Theory and Observations,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, M. Biagetti, M. Braglia, G. Cabass, R. Caldwell, E. Castorina, X. Chen, W. Coulton, R. Flauger and J. Fumagalli,et al.“Inflation: Theory and Observations,” [arXiv:2203.08128 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  6. [6]

    Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observa- tions,

    N. Bartolo, E. Komatsu, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, “Non-Gaussianity from inflation: Theory and observa- tions,” Phys. Rept.402, 103-266 (2004) [arXiv:astro- ph/0406398 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 2004

  7. [7]

    Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Infla- tion Models,

    X. Chen, “Primordial Non-Gaussianities from Infla- tion Models,” Adv. Astron.2010, 638979 (2010) [arXiv:1002.1416 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  8. [8]

    Inflation, Cosmic Perturbations and Non- Gaussianities,

    Y. Wang, “Inflation, Cosmic Perturbations and Non- Gaussianities,” Commun. Theor. Phys.62, 109-166 (2014) [arXiv:1303.1523 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  9. [9]

    Reconstructing the Inflationary Landscape with Cosmological Data,

    X. Chen, G. A. Palma, B. Scheihing Hitschfeld and S. Sypsas, “Reconstructing the Inflationary Landscape with Cosmological Data,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, no.16, 161302 (2018) [arXiv:1806.05202 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    Landscape tomography through primordial non-Gaussianity,

    X. Chen, G. A. Palma, W. Riquelme, B. Schei- hing Hitschfeld and S. Sypsas, “Landscape tomography through primordial non-Gaussianity,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.8, 083528 (2018) [arXiv:1804.07315 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [12]

    Schwinger- Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang and Z. Z. Xianyu, “Schwinger- Keldysh Diagrammatics for Primordial Perturbations,” JCAP12, 006 (2017) [arXiv:1703.10166 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  12. [13]

    Quantum contributions to cosmologi- cal correlations,

    S. Weinberg, “Quantum contributions to cosmologi- cal correlations,” Phys. Rev. D72, 043514 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0506236 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  13. [14]

    The ’in-in’ For- malism and Cosmological Perturbations,

    P. Adshead, R. Easther and E. A. Lim, “The ’in-in’ For- malism and Cosmological Perturbations,” Phys. Rev. D 80, 083521 (2009) [arXiv:0904.4207 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [15]

    The Three point correlation function of the cosmic mi- crowave background in inflationary models,

    A. Gangui, F. Lucchin, S. Matarrese and S. Mollerach, “The Three point correlation function of the cosmic mi- crowave background in inflationary models,” Astrophys. J.430, 447-457 (1994) [arXiv:astro-ph/9312033 [astro- ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  15. [16]

    Second order cosmological perturbations from infla- tion,

    V. Acquaviva, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese and A. Riotto, “Second order cosmological perturbations from infla- tion,” Nucl. Phys. B667, 119-148 (2003) [arXiv:astro- ph/0209156 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 2003

  16. [17]

    Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,

    J. M. Maldacena, “Non-Gaussian features of primordial fluctuations in single field inflationary models,” JHEP 05, 013 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0210603 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  17. [18]

    Primordial non-Gaussianity and Bis- pectrum Measurements in the Cosmic Microwave Back- ground and Large-Scale Structure,

    M. Liguori, E. Sefusatti, J. R. Fergusson and E. P. S. Shellard, “Primordial non-Gaussianity and Bis- pectrum Measurements in the Cosmic Microwave Back- ground and Large-Scale Structure,” Adv. Astron.2010, 980523 (2010) [arXiv:1001.4707 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  18. [19]

    The Effective Field Theory of Infla- tion,

    C. Cheung, P. Creminelli, A. L. Fitzpatrick, J. Kaplan and L. Senatore, “The Effective Field Theory of Infla- tion,” JHEP03, 014 (2008) [arXiv:0709.0293 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  19. [20]

    The Shape of non-Gaussianities,

    D. Babich, P. Creminelli and M. Zaldarriaga, “The Shape of non-Gaussianities,” JCAP08, 009 (2004) [arXiv:astro-ph/0405356 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  20. [21]

    Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity,

    Y. Akramiet al.[Planck], “Planck 2018 results. IX. Con- straints on primordial non-Gaussianity,” Astron. Astro- phys.641, A9 (2020) [arXiv:1905.05697 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  21. [22]

    Non- Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation and their Optimal Limits from the WMAP 5-year Data,

    L. Senatore, K. M. Smith and M. Zaldarriaga, “Non- Gaussianities in Single Field Inflation and their Optimal Limits from the WMAP 5-year Data,” JCAP01, 028 (2010) [arXiv:0905.3746 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  22. [23]

    Inflation and String Theory,

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister, “Inflation and String Theory,” Cambridge University Press, 2015, ISBN 978-1-107-08969-3, 978-1-316-23718-2 [arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [24]

    Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum,

    E. Komatsu and D. N. Spergel, “Acoustic signatures in the primary microwave background bispectrum,” Phys. Rev. D63, 063002 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0005036 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  24. [25]

    The Inflationary predic- tion for primordial non-Gaussianity,

    D. H. Lyth and Y. Rodriguez, “The Inflationary predic- tion for primordial non-Gaussianity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(2005), 121302 [arXiv:astro-ph/0504045 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  25. [26]

    The Pri- mordial density perturbation in the curvaton sce- nario,

    D. H. Lyth, C. Ungarelli and D. Wands, “The Pri- mordial density perturbation in the curvaton sce- nario,” Phys. Rev. D67(2003), 023503 [arXiv:astro- ph/0208055 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 2003

  26. [27]

    Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Large non-Gaussianities with Intermediate Shapes from Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D81, 063511 (2010) [arXiv:0909.0496 [astro- ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [28]

    Quasi-Single Field In- flation with Large Mass,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field In- flation with Large Mass,” JCAP09, 021 (2012) [arXiv:1205.0160 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  28. [29]

    Quasi-Single Field Infla- tion and Non-Gaussianities,

    X. Chen and Y. Wang, “Quasi-Single Field Infla- tion and Non-Gaussianities,” JCAP04, 027 (2010) [arXiv:0911.3380 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [30]

    Effec- tive field theory approach to quasi-single field infla- tion and effects of heavy fields,

    T. Noumi, M. Yamaguchi and D. Yokoyama, “Effec- tive field theory approach to quasi-single field infla- tion and effects of heavy fields,” JHEP06, 051 (2013) [arXiv:1211.1624 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  30. [31]

    Cosmological Collider Physics,

    N. Arkani-Hamed and J. Maldacena, “Cosmological Collider Physics,” [arXiv:1503.08043 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  31. [32]

    Non- Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,

    H. Lee, D. Baumann and G. L. Pimentel, “Non- Gaussianity as a Particle Detector,” JHEP12, 040 (2016) [arXiv:1607.03735 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [33]

    Prospects for Cosmological Collider Physics,

    P. D. Meerburg, M. M¨ unchmeyer, J. B. Mu˜ noz and X. Chen, “Prospects for Cosmological Collider Physics,” JCAP03, 050 (2017) [arXiv:1610.06559 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  33. [34]

    Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,

    X. Chen, Y. Wang and Z. Z. Xianyu, “Standard Model Background of the Cosmological Collider,” Phys. Rev. Lett.118, no.26, 261302 (2017) [arXiv:1610.06597 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [35]

    Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,

    H. An, M. McAneny, A. K. Ridgway and M. B. Wise, “Quasi Single Field Inflation in the non-perturbative regime,” JHEP06, 105 (2018) [arXiv:1706.09971 [hep- ph]]. 25

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  35. [36]

    Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,

    A. V. Iyer, S. Pi, Y. Wang, Z. Wang and S. Zhou, “Strongly Coupled Quasi-Single Field Inflation,” JCAP 01, 041 (2018) [arXiv:1710.03054 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [37]

    On the inflationary massive field with a curved field manifold,

    D. G. Wang, “On the inflationary massive field with a curved field manifold,” JCAP01, 046 (2020) [arXiv:1911.04459 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  37. [38]

    Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,

    S. Aoki and M. Yamaguchi, “Disentangling mass spectra of multiple fields in cosmological collider,” JHEP04, 127 (2021) [arXiv:2012.13667 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  38. [39]

    Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spec- troscopy,

    L. Pinol, S. Aoki, S. Renaux-Petel and M. Yamaguchi, “Inflationary flavor oscillations and the cosmic spec- troscopy,” Phys. Rev. D107, no.2, L021301 (2023) [arXiv:2112.05710 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [40]

    Light scalars at the cosmological collider,

    P. Chakraborty and J. Stout, “Light scalars at the cosmological collider,” JHEP02, 021 (2024) [arXiv:2310.01494 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    BOSS constraints on massive particles during inflation: The cosmological collider in action,

    G. Cabass, O. H. E. Philcox, M. M. Ivanov, K. Akitsu, S. F. Chen, M. Simonovi´ c and M. Zaldarriaga, “BOSS constraints on massive particles during inflation: The cosmological collider in action,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.6, 063510 (2025) [arXiv:2404.01894 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    Massive inflationary am- plitudes: new representations and degenerate limits,

    Z. Z. Xianyu and J. Zang, “Massive inflationary am- plitudes: new representations and degenerate limits,” JHEP03, 122 (2026) [arXiv:2511.08677 [hep-th]]

    arXiv 2026

  42. [43]

    Cosmo- logical Collider Searches beyond the Hubble Scale with Planck Data,

    S. Kumar, Q. Lu, Z. Z. Xianyu and Y. Zhang, “Cosmo- logical Collider Searches beyond the Hubble Scale with Planck Data,” [arXiv:2603.15728 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  43. [44]

    Scalars at the Cosmological Collider: Full Shapes of Tree Di- agrams and Bispectrum Searches using Planck Data,

    S. Kumar, Q. Lu, Z. Z. Xianyu and Y. Zhang, “Scalars at the Cosmological Collider: Full Shapes of Tree Di- agrams and Bispectrum Searches using Planck Data,” [arXiv:2604.07434 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [45]

    The Limitations of Cosmological Col- lider Analyses,

    O. H. E. Philcox, “The Limitations of Cosmological Col- lider Analyses,” [arXiv:2607.12010 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [46]

    Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from infla- tion,

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett and R. Maartens, “Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from infla- tion,” Phys. Rev. D63, 023506 (2001) [arXiv:astro- ph/0009131 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 2001

  46. [47]

    Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B. J. W. van Tent, “Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,” Class. Quant. Grav.19, 613-640 (2002) [arXiv:hep- ph/0107272 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2002

  47. [48]

    Perturbations in gen- eralized multi-field inflation,

    D. Langlois and S. Renaux-Petel, “Perturbations in gen- eralized multi-field inflation,” JCAP04, 017 (2008) [arXiv:0801.1085 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  48. [49]

    The Gelaton Scenario: Equilateral non-Gaussianity from multi-field dynam- ics,

    A. J. Tolley and M. Wyman, “The Gelaton Scenario: Equilateral non-Gaussianity from multi-field dynam- ics,” Phys. Rev. D81(2010), 043502 [arXiv:0910.1853 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  49. [50]

    Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, J. O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma and S. P. Patil, “Features of heavy physics in the CMB power spectrum,” JCAP01, 030 (2011) [arXiv:1010.3693 [hep-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [51]

    Correlating features in the primordial spectra,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, J. O. Gong, G. A. Palma and S. P. Patil, “Correlating features in the primordial spectra,” Phys. Rev. D87, 121301 (2013) [arXiv:1211.5619 [astro- ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  51. [52]

    Oscillatory fea- tures in the curvature power spectrum after a sud- den turn of the inflationary trajectory,

    X. Gao, D. Langlois and S. Mizuno, “Oscillatory fea- tures in the curvature power spectrum after a sud- den turn of the inflationary trajectory,” JCAP10, 023 (2013) [arXiv:1306.5680 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [53]

    Lo- calized correlated features in the CMB power spectrum and primordial bispectrum from a transient reduction in the speed of sound,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, V. Atal, P. Ortiz and J. Torrado, “Lo- calized correlated features in the CMB power spectrum and primordial bispectrum from a transient reduction in the speed of sound,” Phys. Rev. D89, 103006 (2014) [arXiv:1311.2552 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  53. [54]

    Combined fea- tures in the primordial spectra induced by a sudden turn in two-field DBI inflation,

    S. Mizuno, R. Saito and D. Langlois, “Combined fea- tures in the primordial spectra induced by a sudden turn in two-field DBI inflation,” JCAP11, 032 (2014) [arXiv:1405.4257 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  54. [55]

    Inflation with moderately sharp features in the speed of sound: Generalized slow roll and in-in formal- ism for power spectrum and bispectrum,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, V. Atal, B. Hu, P. Ortiz and J. Tor- rado, “Inflation with moderately sharp features in the speed of sound: Generalized slow roll and in-in formal- ism for power spectrum and bispectrum,” Phys. Rev. D 90, 023511 (2014) [arXiv:1404.7522 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  55. [56]

    Towards general patterns of features in multi-field inflation,

    X. Gao and J. O. Gong, “Towards general patterns of features in multi-field inflation,” JHEP08, 115 (2015) [arXiv:1506.08894 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [57]

    Primordial spectra from sudden turning trajectory,

    T. Noumi and M. Yamaguchi, “Primordial spectra from sudden turning trajectory,” JCAP12, 038 (2013) [arXiv:1307.7110 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [58]

    Curvature Perturbation Spectrum in Two-field Inflation with a Turning Trajectory,

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki, “Curvature Perturbation Spectrum in Two-field Inflation with a Turning Trajectory,” JCAP 10(2012), 051 [arXiv:1205.0161 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  58. [59]

    Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid infla- tion,

    J. Garcia-Bellido, A. D. Linde and D. Wands, “Density perturbations and black hole formation in hybrid infla- tion,” Phys. Rev. D54, 6040-6058 (1996) [arXiv:astro- ph/9605094 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 1996

  59. [60]

    Seeding primordial black holes in multifield inflation,

    G. A. Palma, S. Sypsas and C. Zenteno, “Seeding primordial black holes in multifield inflation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.125, no.12, 121301 (2020) [arXiv:2004.06106 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  60. [61]

    Turning in the landscape: A new mechanism for generating primordial black holes,

    J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel, J. W. Ronayne and L. T. Witkowski, “Turning in the landscape: A new mechanism for generating primordial black holes,” Phys. Lett. B841, 137921 (2023) [arXiv:2004.08369 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  61. [62]

    Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation,

    M. Braglia, D. K. Hazra, F. Finelli, G. F. Smoot, L. Sri- ramkumar and A. A. Starobinsky, “Generating PBHs and small-scale GWs in two-field models of inflation,” JCAP08, 001 (2020) [arXiv:2005.02895 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  62. [63]

    Primordial black hole formation in nonminimal curvaton scenarios,

    S. Pi and M. Sasaki, “Primordial black hole formation in nonminimal curvaton scenarios,” Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) no.10, 10 [arXiv:2112.12680 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  63. [64]

    On Primordial Black Holes from Rapid Turns in Two-field Models,

    L. Anguelova, “On Primordial Black Holes from Rapid Turns in Two-field Models,” JCAP06, 004 (2021) [arXiv:2012.03705 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  64. [65]

    Primordial black holes from multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings,

    S. R. Geller, W. Qin, E. McDonough and D. I. Kaiser, “Primordial black holes from multifield inflation with nonminimal couplings,” Phys. Rev. D106, no.6, 063535 (2022) [arXiv:2205.04471 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  65. [66]

    Light Scalar Fields Foster Production of Primordial Black Holes,

    D. L. Lorenzoni, S. R. Geller, Z. Ireland, D. I. Kaiser, E. McDonough and K. A. Wittmeier, “Light Scalar Fields Foster Production of Primordial Black Holes,” [arXiv:2504.13251 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  66. [67]

    The effect of multiple features on the power spec- trum in two-field inflation,

    K. Boutivas, I. Dalianis, G. P. Kodaxis and N. Tetradis, “The effect of multiple features on the power spec- trum in two-field inflation,” JCAP08, 021 (2022) [arXiv:2203.15605 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  67. [68]

    Primordial non- Gaussianities from multiple-field inflation,

    D. Seery and J. E. Lidsey, “Primordial non- Gaussianities from multiple-field inflation,” JCAP09, 011 (2005) [arXiv:astro-ph/0506056 [astro-ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  68. [69]

    Large non-Gaussianity in multiple-field infla- tion,

    G. I. Rigopoulos, E. P. S. Shellard and B. J. W. van Tent, “Large non-Gaussianity in multiple-field infla- tion,” Phys. Rev. D73, 083522 (2006) [arXiv:astro- ph/0506704 [astro-ph]]

    arXiv 2006

  69. [70]

    Non-Gaussianities in two- field inflation,

    F. Vernizzi and D. Wands, “Non-Gaussianities in two- field inflation,” JCAP05, 019 (2006) [arXiv:astro- ph/0603799 [astro-ph]]. 26

    arXiv 2006

  70. [71]

    Condi- tions for large non-Gaussianity in two-field slow-roll in- flation,

    C. T. Byrnes, K.-Y. Choi and L. M. H. Hall, “Condi- tions for large non-Gaussianity in two-field slow-roll in- flation,” JCAP10, 008 (2008) [arXiv:0807.1101 [astro- ph]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  71. [72]

    Flattened non- Gaussianities from the effective field theory of inflation with imaginary speed of sound,

    S. Garcia-Saenz and S. Renaux-Petel, “Flattened non- Gaussianities from the effective field theory of inflation with imaginary speed of sound,” JCAP11, 005 (2018) [arXiv:1805.12563 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [73]

    Hyper-Non-Gaussianities in Inflation with Strongly Nongeodesic Motion,

    J. Fumagalli, S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol, S. Renaux-Petel and J. Ronayne, “Hyper-Non-Gaussianities in Inflation with Strongly Nongeodesic Motion,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, no.20, 201302 (2019) [arXiv:1902.03221 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  73. [74]

    Mild Non-Gaussianities under Perturbative Control from Rapid-Turn Inflation Models,

    T. Bjorkmo, R. Z. Ferreira and M. C. D. Marsh, “Mild Non-Gaussianities under Perturbative Control from Rapid-Turn Inflation Models,” JCAP12, 036 (2019) [arXiv:1908.11316 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [75]

    Revis- iting non-Gaussianity in multifield inflation with curved field space,

    S. Garcia-Saenz, L. Pinol and S. Renaux-Petel, “Revis- iting non-Gaussianity in multifield inflation with curved field space,” JHEP01, 073 (2020) [arXiv:1907.10403 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  75. [76]

    Non- Gaussianity in rapid-turn multi-field inflation,

    O. Iarygina, M. C. D. Marsh and G. Salinas, “Non- Gaussianity in rapid-turn multi-field inflation,” JCAP 03, 014 (2024) [arXiv:2303.14156 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  76. [77]

    Universal Non- Gaussian Signatures from Transient Instabilities,

    S. Aoki, D. Roest and D. Werth, “Universal Non- Gaussian Signatures from Transient Instabilities,” [arXiv:2604.01035 [astro-ph.CO]]

    arXiv

  77. [78]

    Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation,

    Z. Lalak, D. Langlois, S. Pokorski and K. Turzy´ nski, “Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation,” JCAP07, 014 (2007) [arXiv:0704.0212 [hep- th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  78. [79]

    The effects of a fast-turning trajectory in multiple-field in- flation,

    M. Konieczka, R. H. Ribeiro and K. Turzy´ nski, “The effects of a fast-turning trajectory in multiple-field in- flation,” JCAP07, 030 (2014) [arXiv:1401.6163 [astro- ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  79. [80]

    Origin of ultra-light fields during inflation and their suppressed non-Gaussianity,

    A. Ach´ ucarro, G. A. Palma, D. G. Wang and Y. Welling, “Origin of ultra-light fields during inflation and their suppressed non-Gaussianity,” JCAP10, 018 (2020) [arXiv:1908.06956 [hep-th]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  80. [81]

    Oscillations in the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from sharp features and particle production dur- ing inflation,

    J. Fumagalli, S. Renaux-Petel and L. T. Witkowski, “Oscillations in the stochastic gravitational wave back- ground from sharp features and particle production dur- ing inflation,” JCAP08, 030 (2021) [arXiv:2012.02761 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.