Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.789846Z
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer?
As of 23 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 50 of 50 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2507.23244.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: cited_works
Reference resolution
50 of 50 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy28
- unresolved22
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
Observation c42ec8a1-85f4-4fc8-a0d4-d4c459a2fbd9 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 1
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.413156Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 90968d4e-39e9-4b7c-947b-8f0a442f1887 · outbound
This paper cites Savran, T.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Savran, T
Reference 2
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.401317Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 72bf4fa6-3edd-4efe-b786-acc411569421 · outbound
This paper cites Bracco, E.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Bracco, E
Reference 3
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.389346Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 9a4686ab-5e29-406b-90e3-ad32d993d2c2 · outbound
This paper cites Lanza, L.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Lanza, L
Reference 4
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.376990Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 54e4c5de-e853-4a64-864e-896c86108ed6 · outbound
This paper cites Piekarewicz, Phys.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Piekarewicz, Phys
Reference 5
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.630620Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation bfee96bb-c064-49c2-8a0c-60ae785cb610 · outbound
This paper cites Carbone, G.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Carbone, G
Reference 6
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.357405Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation a46d6cab-2c6d-423a-9e7a-d325c10051fc · outbound
This paper cites Goriely, Physics Letters B 436, 10 (1998).
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Goriely, Physics Letters B 436, 10 (1998)
Reference 7
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.345265Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation ae46339c-1f12-49b8-9e17-13a10b98722d · outbound
This paper cites Goriely, E.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Goriely, E
Reference 8
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.333021Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation d9c3c4ad-5690-421a-a254-0e11b00a96a9 · outbound
This paper cites Tonchev, N.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Tonchev, N
Reference 9
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.322077Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 70f3391d-c152-4cc5-8ebf-ce30ab47dcd2 · outbound
This paper cites Adrich, A.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Adrich, A
Reference 10
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.311913Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation aeb7ab13-9b24-4579-878e-73e9c85da736 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 11
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.300359Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 57891406-4334-48d5-b066-5ef7a16573b9 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 12
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.288637Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation cdc62050-3fe6-422f-ab5a-863abe322c6f · outbound
This paper cites Catara, E.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Catara, E
Reference 13
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.279132Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 718d4bbe-12ae-48f7-96db-4baef36f563b · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.270202Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 4c2c7348-3ce5-4527-93cb-0fb4ce6442e8 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 15
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.261623Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation dd493c4f-8d1a-4938-a9f8-df28f7dc476c · outbound
This paper cites Martini, S.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Martini, S
Reference 16
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.252073Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 3268bf90-b4e5-4582-bc03-adb3ed91e327 · outbound
This paper cites Tsoneva and H.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Tsoneva and H
Reference 17
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.674820Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation a4a71802-7b3a-40e3-bd7e-6f25b0d92ac0 · outbound
This paper cites Vretenar, N.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Vretenar, N
Reference 18
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.138356Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 08b772c3-ac51-4029-88a8-c9b675ef7605 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 19
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.128148Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation a7d5f713-a115-4897-8b31-7e4a48b7a841 · outbound
This paper cites Pe˜ na Arteaga, E.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Pe˜ na Arteaga, E
Reference 20
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.117780Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation d34ceebc-56c1-4b9c-aff0-6eb3e17e2e28 · outbound
This paper cites Vretenar, N.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Vretenar, N
Reference 21
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.108585Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 3b0679c1-7160-4363-83c1-70d7b386b7f5 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 22
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.099541Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 705807f7-3614-41ee-94f1-5cbd163d8272 · outbound
This paper cites Col` o and P.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Col` o and P
Reference 23
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.090273Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation ade29e4f-43d2-49c5-a2e5-62b25d8d9401 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 24
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.080833Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation d524bf19-da87-4bdb-a846-06bbfa7eabbe · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 25
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.070785Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation f0c437ec-3c33-4a28-9548-f82fd4928a0d · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 26
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.061013Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 5aba1106-ce95-4bc2-83b4-9541ad4a8430 · outbound
This paper cites Stephan, R.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Stephan, R
Reference 27
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.051407Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 3599939b-4928-49b9-ae40-8e9162458d87 · outbound
This paper cites Rusev, E.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Rusev, E
Reference 28
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.042084Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation a1c7442b-268f-4ffa-9476-8a3f0cefa93f · outbound
This paper cites Rusev, R.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Rusev, R
Reference 29
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.032371Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 0ed2ecfe-b122-4dd3-8525-8c4aa75d5093 · outbound
This paper cites Erhard, A.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Erhard, A
Reference 30
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.023307Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation a35481cb-6143-4dd3-8af5-b52704f65ab8 · outbound
This paper cites Derya, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Derya, J
Reference 31
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.013272Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 2a2e8fa3-437d-477b-a445-6f7762c551d4 · outbound
This paper cites Romig, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Romig, J
Reference 32
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:08.003788Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 67b26ef9-4d50-48ae-ae17-d99102d17c09 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 33
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.993082Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation fabb6c89-f784-484a-a6a4-e0d9167b1371 · outbound
This paper cites Pascu, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Pascu, J
Reference 34
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.982861Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 42db66df-e063-4da1-be28-73b1e09f2fdd · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 35
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.971528Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 1565d768-9c24-4953-8b70-8aebb7c11eea · outbound
This paper cites Decharg´ e and D.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Decharg´ e and D
Reference 36
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.741258Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 61925b4a-0dbe-4c8c-8cb3-0014172ef487 · outbound
This paper cites Goriely, S.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Goriely, S
Reference 37
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.744483Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation d6e76ecd-6176-4ca6-ba64-6167cc2e3c0b · outbound
This paper cites P´ eru and M.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? P´ eru and M
Reference 38
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.950123Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation bef2fcc7-8754-42cb-b458-8fd076cc674b · outbound
This paper cites Ring and P.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Ring and P
Reference 39
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.940889Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation ba80bbf7-4c73-49c9-b832-e2d9bb97d4c6 · outbound
This paper cites Younes and D.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Younes and D
Reference 40
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.931623Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation e0b18c5d-1193-47d3-b3e8-32aeabd8929d · outbound
This paper cites Younes, D.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Younes, D
Reference 41
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.921380Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 08b710ea-5141-4f99-a80e-379071961778 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 42
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.910669Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation ee3b8734-c464-4f97-a6d7-962751692d94 · outbound
This paper cites Bauge, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Bauge, J
Reference 43
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.764395Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation 1fbe48eb-3dc1-40f7-9c43-8327c1ba945e · outbound
This paper cites Bauge, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Bauge, J
Reference 44
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.768071Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation b02cd713-d28e-4eb9-b46d-775d731529ac · outbound
This paper cites Dupuis, G.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Dupuis, G
Reference 45
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.885468Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation a55a9b60-256e-4eb0-ab53-cee75f5df8d2 · outbound
This paper cites Thapa, J.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Thapa, J
Reference 46
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.872158Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation fac24219-b1da-42c8-80ad-f8d18ecdbfc0 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 47
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.860182Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 6ef8d4a3-0940-4100-8abd-01153634b085 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 48
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.848019Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 7a901707-deeb-48b0-994d-12b6e1dae013 · outbound
This paper cites an unresolved cited work.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Unresolved cited work
Reference 49
- Resolution
- unresolved
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.835994Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Observation 7a60b6cc-2b6e-4ffc-9fe6-08ee614053f9 · outbound
This paper cites Tsoneva, H.
Uncovering the nature of low-lying dipole states with QRPA calculations: is Z=42 the answer? Tsoneva, H
Reference 50
- Resolution
- verified fuzzy
- raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-06T10:58:07.823597Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-23T06:30:58.430688+00:00.
Pith citing papers
No inbound Pith citation observations are available.