Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Attention-Enhancing Backdoor Attacks Against BERT-based Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.14480 v2 pith:E3KJDZ45 submitted 2023-10-23 cs.LG

classification cs.LG
keywords attacksbackdoormodelsattackattentiondifferentdirectlyloss
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent studies have revealed that \textit{Backdoor Attacks} can threaten the safety of natural language processing (NLP) models. Investigating the strategies of backdoor attacks will help to understand the model's vulnerability. Most existing textual backdoor attacks focus on generating stealthy triggers or modifying model weights. In this paper, we directly target the interior structure of neural networks and the backdoor mechanism. We propose a novel Trojan Attention Loss (TAL), which enhances the Trojan behavior by directly manipulating the attention patterns. Our loss can be applied to different attacking methods to boost their attack efficacy in terms of attack successful rates and poisoning rates. It applies to not only traditional dirty-label attacks, but also the more challenging clean-label attacks. We validate our method on different backbone models (BERT, RoBERTa, and DistilBERT) and various tasks (Sentiment Analysis, Toxic Detection, and Topic Classification).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Credit Risk Identification in Supply Chains Using Generative Adversarial Networks

    cs.LG 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A GAN-based model is reported to beat baseline classifiers for supply chain credit risk, but the evaluation uses synthetic test data and no artifacts are provided.

Pith tools