Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 38 references

The underappreciated role of nonspecific interactions in the crystallization of DNA-coated colloids

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper shows that nonspecific steric and van der Waals interactions, not only designed DNA binding, determine the equilibrium crystal structure of binary DNA-coated colloids, producing a tunable family of body-centered tetragonal…

desk verdict New continuous BCT polymorph family tuned by nonspecific interactions, with strong experiment-simulation agreement; the theory has a calibrated parameter that needs sensitivity testing. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.02220 v2 pith:E5IRMQRL submitted 2025-01-04 cond-mat.soft cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Hunter Seyforth , Sambarta Chatterjee , Thomas E. Videb{ae}k , Manodeep Mondal , William M. Jacobs , W. Benjamin Rogers This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softcond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords DNA-coatedcolloidscolloidalcrystallizationnonspecificinteractionsvanderWaalsattractionstericrepulsionbody-centeredtetragonalcrystalsprogrammableself-assemblypolymerbrush
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that in binary mixtures of DNA-coated colloidal particles, the crystal structure is not set only by the designed DNA attractions and particle sizes; nonspecific steric and van der Waals interactions can be equally decisive. For same-sized micron-scale particles, varying the polymer brush length and particle diameter produces a continuous family of body-centered tetragonal (BCT) crystals whose unit-cell shape interpolates between cesium-chloride (CsCl) and copper-gold (CuAu) limits. The authors reproduce the observed structures with molecular-dynamics simulations based on microscopic pair potentials, and a thermodynamic perturbation theory explains which crystal wins by balancing harmonic phonon entropy, same-type particle repulsion, and van der Waals attraction. If correct, this means crystal-engineering design rules must treat nonspecific forces as tunable parameters, not background noise.

What carries the argument

The central object is the dimensionless BCT parameter C, which interpolates between the cubic CsCl (C=0) and CuAu (C=1) unit cells. The argument is carried by the microscopic pair-potential model of DNA-coated colloids (reference [15]), which self-consistently computes the free energy of DNA hybridization, polymer-brush steric repulsion, and van der Waals attraction as a function of particle separation; these potentials feed constant-pressure molecular dynamics that predict equilibrium C. A thermodynamic perturbation theory then decomposes the crystal free energy into a harmonic reference crystal with A-B bonds, an anharmonic correction from same-type A-A/B-B repulsion, and a perturbative van der Waals term, showing how the balance of these small driving forces selects C. The anharmonic term and the vdW term are the decisive machinery: one favors low C, the other high C, and their near-cancellation explains both the non-cubic equilibrium and the sensitivity to design parameters.

What would settle it

Measure the polymer grafting density (for example, by quantifying DNA and PEO coverage per particle) for each particle diameter and molecular weight, feed the measured densities into the microscopic pair-potential model, and check whether the predicted equilibrium C values still match the experimentally observed BCT lattices; if the C-MW trend depends strongly on the assumed constant density, the central claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a binary suspension of same-sized, micron-scale DNA-coated colloids, the equilibrium crystal is generically a non-cubic body-centered tetragonal (BCT) lattice, continuously parameterized by C in [0,1], rather than one of the two cubic end members. The paper's central discovery is that this C value is determined by a competition between specific DNA-mediated attraction and nonspecific forces of similar magnitude: steric repulsion between polymer brushes pushes C down, van der Waals attraction between same-type particle pairs pushes C up, and the harmonic phonon entropy of the reference crystal also favors higher C. Tuning polymer molecular weight, particle diameter, or the mixing fraction of complementary DNA strands shifts the balance and continuously moves the lattice between CsCl-like (C~0) and CuAu-like (C~1) structures. Simulations using pair potentials from a microscopic model reproduce the experimental C values nearly quantitatively, and the perturbation theory shows the same trend. The paper concludes that nonspecific interactions are not a nuisance to be ignored but a control knob for programmable self-assembly.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative match between simulation and experiment assumes that the polymer brush density is identical across all particle sizes and polymer molecular weights, even though each batch is synthesized separately; if grafting density varies with molecular weight or particle size, the predicted pair potentials and C values shift.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Same-sized binary DNA-coated colloids can spontaneously form a one-parameter family of BCT crystals, including continuous transitions between CsCl and CuAu, not just the two cubic extremes.
  • Changing the polymer brush molecular weight or the particle diameter shifts the equilibrium C parameter by altering how strongly van der Waals attraction acts at the brush-contact distance.
  • Van der Waals attraction is not required for CuAu-like BCT crystals; harmonic phonon entropy alone favors high C, so BCT stability survives even when vdW is removed.
  • Introducing a DNA-mediated attraction between same-type particles also tunes C continuously from 0.1 to 0.8 as the strand-mixing fraction increases, confirming that any same-type attraction of comparable range can play the vdW role.
  • The coexistence theory predicts melting temperatures with absolute errors under 2 degrees Celsius, so the same pair potentials plus perturbation theory can be used to predict both structure and thermal stability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A general design rule suggested by the paper, though not stated as such: any weak attraction active when same-type particles approach (vdW, DNA hybridization, depletion) should push the equilibrium toward CuAu-like structures, whereas thicker or denser brushes push toward CsCl-like structures.
  • The flat free-energy landscape near the midpoint of the continuous transition may explain the batch-to-batch and crystal-to-crystal scatter seen in prior DNA-coated-colloid experiments, and why certain predicted cubic lattices have been hard to realize.
  • One testable extension is to replace vdW attraction with a tunable depletion interaction; the model predicts the same continuous C shift, which could be checked in the same 600 nm and 67 kDa system.
  • For nanometer-scale DNA-coated particles, where vdW is much weaker, the theory implies a baseline C set by phonon entropy and brush repulsion; dedicated simulations could predict whether BCT intermediates should appear there too.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a combined experimental, simulation, and theoretical study of binary DNA-coated colloids. Experimentally, 600-nm and 430-nm particles with PEO brushes of four molecular weights form body-centered tetragonal (BCT) crystals whose continuously varying aspect-ratio parameter C is characterized by confocal imaging and RDF matching. Constant-pressure simulations using independent pair potentials from Ref. [15] reproduce the experimental C values (R = 0.95) without fitted parameters. A perturbation-theory model, using a harmonic reference binary crystal and perturbative corrections for van der Waals attraction and anharmonic A-A/B-B repulsion, reproduces the qualitative trends (R = 0.88) and attributes structure selection to a balance among weak harmonic, anharmonic, and vdW contributions. A separate experiment with mixed DNA strands shows a continuous, tunable transition from CsCl-like to CuAu-like structures. Simulation, analysis, and theory scripts are provided on GitHub.

Significance. Strengths: the experimental survey is systematic, the simulation-experiment agreement is quantitative and achieved with independently computed pair potentials, melting temperatures are predicted with R = 0.98, and the paper makes falsifiable predictions (a continuous BCT family and the result that vdW attraction is not required for high C values). The theoretical model is a useful interpretative tool, but its quantitative C predictions are less secure because they rely on a calibrated Gaussian approximation for g_AA,ref; this weakness does not affect the experimental or simulation conclusions. If the theoretical parametrization is made robust, the work will be an important step toward including nonspecific interactions in the design of programmable colloidal crystals.

major comments (2)
  1. [Appendix B, Eq. (B6), and Fig. 3B] The anharmonic entropy term that stabilizes low-C BCT crystals uses g_AA,ref approximated as a Gaussian whose width is set by a single parameter alpha, chosen from zero-pressure simulations at C = 0. The paper states that this term is essential for stabilizing low-C BCT crystals, yet no sensitivity analysis is reported. Because the predicted equilibrium C is the minimum of mu_coex(C) set by the competition between this anharmonic term and the vdW attraction, a different alpha or an alpha that varies with C, molecular weight, or particle diameter would shift the theoretical C values and the reported R = 0.88 correlation. Please provide a sensitivity analysis over a physically plausible range of alpha, or determine alpha independently across the phase diagram, and specify the units or dimensionality of alpha.
  2. [Supplementary Information, Sec. II (Solving the crystal structures)] The experimental structure classification uses a look-up table containing only BCC/FCC/BCT facets, so BCT is the only non-cubic structure family the classifier can return. Because the central experimental claim is that the assembled crystals are BCT, this identification is circular unless alternative binary lattices (e.g., simple tetragonal, orthorhombic, or wurtzite-type arrangements) are explicitly ruled out by the RDF data. Please include such alternative structures in the comparison or state clearly that the BCT assignment is an assumption whose credibility rests on the independent simulation agreement shown in Fig. 3.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. II.E and Appendix B] The symbol alpha is used for the strand-mixing fraction in Sec. II.E and for the Gaussian width scaling factor in Appendix B; this notation conflict should be resolved.
  2. [Appendix B, Eq. (B6)] The meanings of x and d_AA in Eq. (B6) are not defined: please state the coordinate used in the integrals and define d_AA as the minimum A-A/B-B pair distance, and clarify why the upper limit of both integrals is d_AA.
  3. [Fig. 2] The caption says the pair potentials are shown as black curves, but the figure uses distinct styling for the two molecular weights; please label the curves directly or in the legend.
  4. [Fig. 3B and Fig. S3] The reported Pearson correlation coefficients are based on a small number of systems; please state the number of data points for each R value and, for R = 0.88, provide an uncertainty estimate such as a bootstrap confidence interval.
  5. [Sec. II.C] The sentence stating that C decreases from roughly 0.6 to 0.2 as MW increases applies only to the 600-nm particles; for the 430-nm particles the C values are already low and nearly independent of MW, so please qualify the statement.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central experimental and simulation claims rest on an independent pair-potential model, and the theory's one calibrated width parameter is anchored to a C=0 reference simulation rather than to the experimental C values being predicted.

full rationale

The paper's main claim is supported by a chain that is not self-referential. The pair potentials are taken from an independent microscopic model (Ref. [15], Cui et al., not authored by the present authors), and the constant-pressure simulations are parameter-free predictions from those potentials: they initialize multiple BCT structures and let the box dimensions relax under the predicted pair potentials, then compare the resulting C values with experimental measurements. The experimental C values are determined geometrically from confocal imaging and a BCT lookup table, not from the simulation or theory. The theoretical model does contain one calibrated quantity: the width parameter α in the approximate A-A/B-B radial distribution function, g_AA,ref(x) ∝ exp[−(α k_AB/2)(x−d_AA/2)^2], chosen as α≈1×10^-4 from zero-pressure simulations of the reference crystal with C=0 (Appendix B). This anharmonic term is stated to be essential for stabilizing low-C BCT crystals, so the quantitative C predictions of the theory do depend on this choice; a different α could shift the predicted minima of µ_coex(C). However, this is a model-approximation caveat, not circularity: α is not fitted to the experimental C values being predicted, and the main experimental/simulation comparison does not use α at all. No load-bearing self-citation, imported uniqueness claim, or renaming of a known result is present. The theory's α calibration is a legitimate correctness/robustness concern but does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the microscopic pair-potential model of Ref. [15] for all quantitative predictions. Within the paper's own theory, one parameter (alpha) is calibrated to reference simulations rather than derived, and the constant polymer density is an acknowledged assumption. No new physical entities are introduced; the BCT C parameter is a structural order parameter, not an invented entity.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (Gaussian width scaling factor for g_AA,ref) = approximately 1 x 10^-4
    Chosen based on zero-pressure simulations of the reference harmonic crystal with C = 0 (Appendix B, Eq. B6). It sets the width of the approximate Gaussian radial distribution function for non-bonded A-A/B-B pairs, and the resulting anharmonic entropy is described as essential for stabilizing low-C BCT crystals.
  • Crystal-structure lookup step = 0.025 in C
    The look-up table of radial distribution functions samples BCT structures in steps of 0.025 (Supplementary Information, Sec. II), limiting the resolution of the experimental C determination. This is a discretization of the analysis pipeline, not a physical fit.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The microscopic pair-potential model of DNA-coated colloids (Cui et al., Ref. [15]) accurately describes the experimental systems, including vdW, steric, and DNA hybridization free energies.
    Used to compute all pair potentials for simulations and theory (Fig. 2, Sec. II.B). Small discrepancies between simulations and experiments are attributed to the constant polymer density sub-assumption.
  • domain assumption Polymer graft density is constant across all particle sizes and PEO molecular weights.
    Explicitly invoked in Sec. II.C: the authors attribute simulation-experiment discrepancies to 'our assumption that the polymer density is constant across all systems, which may not be the case in reality given that each system is synthesized separately.'
  • domain assumption The observed crystals represent the equilibrium structure at room temperature.
    The paper argues this from the convergence of simulations from 11 initial C values and from the reproducibility across about 100 crystals per system (Sec. II.C).
  • standard math The A-B pair potential can be approximated as a harmonic spring for the reference crystal free energy.
    Appendix B, Eq. B2 uses u_ref(r) = epsilon + (k_AB/2)(r - sigma)^2 and neglects anharmonicity of bonded pairs in the reference system.
  • ad hoc to paper The A-A/B-B radial distribution function in the reference crystal is Gaussian with width controlled by alpha.
    Appendix B, Eq. B6: g_AA,ref(x) proportional to exp[-(alpha k_AB/2)(x - d_AA/2)^2] with alpha approximately 1 x 10^-4 chosen from simulations. This is a modeling ansatz, not derived from first principles.
  • standard math The fluid phase is described by the Carnahan-Starling hard-sphere equation of state with a mean-field attraction term.
    Appendix B, Eqs. B4-B5, used to compute fluid chemical potential and pressure in coexistence calculations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The underappreciated role of nonspecific interactions in the crystallization of DNA-coated colloids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/E5IRMQRL

@misc{pith2026250102220,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The underappreciated role of nonspecific interactions in the crystallization of DNA-coated colloids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/E5IRMQRL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.02220}
}
read the original abstract

Over the last decade, the field of programmable self-assembly has seen an explosion in the diversity of crystal lattices that can be synthesized from DNA-coated colloidal nanometer- and micrometer-scale particles. The prevailing wisdom has been that a particular crystal structure can be targeted by designing the DNA-mediated interactions, to enforce binding between specific particle pairs, and the particle diameters, to control the packing of the various species. In this article, we show that other ubiquitous nonspecific interactions can play equally important roles in determining the relative stability of different crystal polymorphs and therefore what crystal structure is most likely to form in an experiment. For a binary mixture of same-sized DNA-coated colloidal micrometer-scale particles, we show how changing the magnitudes of nonspecific steric and van der Waals interactions gives rise to a family of binary body-centered tetragonal crystals, including both cesium-chloride and copper-gold crystals. Simulations using pair potentials that account for these interactions reproduce our experimental observations quantitatively, and a theoretical model reveals how a subtle balance between specific and nonspecific forces determines the equilibrium crystal structure. These results highlight the importance of accounting for nonspecific interactions in the crystal-engineering design process.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.02220 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    F. Cui, S. Marbach, J. A. Zheng, M. Holmes-Cerfon, and D. J. Pine, Nat. Commun. 13, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    G. M. Whitesides and B. Grzybowski, Science 295, 2418 (2002)

    work page 2002

  3. [2]

    C. A. Mirkin, R. L. Letsinger, R. C. Mucic, and J. J. Storhoff, Nature 382, 607 (1996)

    work page 1996

  4. [3]

    A. P. Alivisatos, K. P. Johnsson, X. Peng, T. E. Wilson, C. J. Loweth, M. P. Bruchez Jr, and P. G. Schultz, Nature 382, 609 (1996)

    work page 1996

  5. [4]

    W. M. Jacobs and W. B. Rogers, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.08988 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  6. [5]

    S. Y. Park, A. K. R. Lytton-Jean, B. Lee, S. Weigand, G. C. Schatz, and C. A. Mirkin, Nature 451, 553 (2008)

    work page 2008

  7. [6]

    Nykypanchuk, M

    D. Nykypanchuk, M. M. Maye, D. van der Lelie, and O. Gang, Nature 451, 549 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    R. J. Macfarlane, B. Lee, M. R. Jones, N. Harris, G. C. Schatz, and C. A. Mirkin, Science 334, 204 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 38 references
  1. [8]

    C. R. Laramy, M. N. O’Brien, and C. A. Mirkin, inSpher- ical Nucleic Acids (Jenny Stanford Publishing, 2020) pp. 227–289

    2020

  2. [9]

    P. L. Biancaniello, A. J. Kim, and J. C. Crocker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 058302 (2005)

    2005

  3. [10]

    Y. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Zheng, ´E. Ducrot, J. S. Yodh, M. Weck, and D. J. Pine, Nat. Commun. 6, 7253 (2015)

    2015

  4. [11]

    M. He, J. P. Gales, ´E. Ducrot, Z. Gong, G.-R. Yi, S. Sacanna, and D. J. Pine, Nature 585, 524 (2020)

    2020

  5. [12]

    Hensley, W

    A. Hensley, W. M. Jacobs, and W. B. Rogers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2114050118 (2022)

    2022

  6. [13]

    Hensley, T

    A. Hensley, T. E. Videbæk, H. Seyforth, W. M. Jacobs, and W. B. Rogers, Nat. Commun. 14, 4237 (2023)

    2023

  7. [14]

    W. B. Rogers and J. C. Crocker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 15687 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Liang, N

    Y. Liang, N. Hilal, P. Langston, and V. Starov, Adv. Coll. Int. Sci. 134, 151 (2007)

    2007

  9. [17]

    J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and surface forces (Academic press, 2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    R. Mao, B. Minevich, D. McKeen, Q. Chen, F. Lu, O. Gang, and J. Mittal, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120, e2302037120 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    Y. Wang, Y. Wang, X. Zheng, ´E. Ducrot, M.-G. Lee, G.- R. Yi, M. Weck, and D. J. Pine, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 10760 (2015)

    2015

  12. [20]

    A. V. Tkachenko, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 113, 10269 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    J. S. Oh, Y. Wang, D. J. Pine, and G.-R. Yi, Chemistry of Materials 27, 8337 (2015)

    2015

  14. [22]

    J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 179, 298 (1996)

    1996

  15. [23]

    M. T. Casey, R. T. Scarlett, W. Benjamin Rogers, I. Jenkins, T. Sinno, and J. C. Crocker, Nat. Commun. 3, 1209 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    H. Hu, P. S. Ruiz, and R. Ni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 048003 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    SantaLucia Jr and D

    J. SantaLucia Jr and D. Hicks, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 415 (2004)

    2004

  18. [26]

    H. Fang, M. F. Hagan, and W. B. Rogers, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 117, 27927 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Zhang, S

    Y. Zhang, S. Pal, B. Srinivasan, T. Vo, S. Kumar, and O. Gang, Nature materials 14, 840 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    R. V. Thaner, Y. Kim, T. I. Li, R. J. Macfarlane, S. T. Nguyen, M. Olvera de la Cruz, and C. A. Mirkin, Nano letters 15, 5545 (2015)

    2015

  21. [29]

    W. B. Rogers, W. M. Shih, and V. N. Manoharan, Nat. Rev. Mater. 1, 16008 (2016)

    2016

  22. [30]

    Elser, Phys

    V. Elser, Phys. Rev. E 89, 052404 (2014)

    2014

  23. [31]

    THE UNDERAPPRECIATED ROLE OF NONSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS IN THE CRYSTALLIZATION OF DNA-COATED COLLOIDS

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of simple liq- uids: with applications to soft matter (Academic press, 2013). 1 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR “THE UNDERAPPRECIATED ROLE OF NONSPECIFIC INTERACTIONS IN THE CRYSTALLIZATION OF DNA-COATED COLLOIDS” I. MATERIALS AND METHODS ...

    2013 arXiv

  24. [32]

    J. S. Oh, Y. Wang, D. J. Pine, and G.-R. Yi, High-density PEO-b-DNA brushes on polymer particles for colloidal superstructures, Chem. Mater. 27, 8337 (2015)

    2015

  25. [33]

    Hensley, T

    A. Hensley, T. E. Videbæk, H. Seyforth, W. M. Jacobs, and W. B. Rogers, Macroscopic photonic single crystals via seeded growth of DNA-coated colloids, Nat. Commun. 14, 4237 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    F. Cui, S. Marbach, J. A. Zheng, M. Holmes-Cerfon, and D. J. Pine, Comprehensive view of microscopic interactions between DNA-coated colloids, Nat. Commun. 13, 1 (2022)

    2022

  27. [35]

    Hensley, W

    A. Hensley, W. M. Jacobs, and W. B. Rogers, Self-assembly of photonic crystals by controlling the nucleation and growth of dna-coated colloids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119, e2114050118 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    J. C. Crocker and D. G. Grier, Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies, J. Coll. Int. Sci. 179, 298 (1996)

    1996

  29. [37]

    Chandler, Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, 1987)

    D. Chandler, Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics (Oxford University Press, 1987)

    1987

  30. [38]

    Hansen and I

    J.-P. Hansen and I. R. McDonald, Theory of simple liquids: with applications to soft matter (Academic press, 2013). 4 IV. ADDITIONAL FIGURES NaCl concentration (mM) 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 600nm 6.5kDa PEO C FIG. S1. Effect of NaCl concentration on th...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.