Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 46 references

A room-temperature dielectric stack and CMOS imager set κ < 4.0×10^{-13} on 1.9 eV dark-photon dark matter after finding no excess in 904 hours of data.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 03:52 UTC pith:EC4XWCIE

load-bearing objection Solid room-temperature CMOS optical-haloscope null result with a pre-fixed spatial template; competitive κ limit near 2 eV and careful calibration, not a conceptual leap.

arxiv 2607.03240 v1 pith:EC4XWCIE submitted 2026-07-03 hep-ex

Searching for Dark Photons with a room-temperature dielectric haloscope

Siyin Li , Paschos Ioannis , Zhengyin Yang , Alexandros Spiliotis , Husheng Guan , Pavlos G. Savvidis , Shengchao Li This is my paper
classification hep-ex
keywords Dark MatterDirect DetectionDark PhotonDielectric HaloscopeCMOS ImagingOptical FrequencyKinetic Mixing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper reports a direct search for dark-photon dark matter near 2 eV using a compact, room-temperature dielectric multilayer that converts the dark field into ordinary photons. A focusing lens images those photons onto a cooled CMOS sensor that is sensitive to few-photon signals, and the whole optical chain is calibrated in place with a laser so that the expected focal-plane light pattern can be used as a template. With 904 hours of stack-on data and 404 hours of stack-off control data, no excess matching that template appears. The resulting 90% confidence upper limit is κ < 4.0×10^{-13} at 1.9 eV/c². The result shows that an optical-frequency dark-photon search can be run without cryogenics by combining a half-wave dielectric stack with spatially resolved single-photon imaging, and that the spatial template roughly doubles the sensitivity relative to simple counting in the same region of interest.

Core claim

After 904 hours of science data and 404 hours of background control, the SPECTRA prototype observes no excess consistent with the calibrated dark-photon conversion template and therefore excludes kinetic mixing κ < 4.0×10^{-13} at 90% confidence for dark-photon dark matter of mass 1.9 eV/c²—the strongest point of the exclusion curve.

What carries the argument

The SPECTRA dielectric optical haloscope: a 47-pair TiO₂/SiO₂ half-wave stack that coherently boosts dark-photon-to-photon conversion near 633 nm, followed by a focusing lens and a cooled CMOS focal plane whose in-situ-calibrated spatial light pattern is used as a template in a profile-likelihood analysis rather than collapsing the data to a single count.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion yield used to turn a photon limit into a κ limit is taken from the transfer-matrix boost factor of the TEM-measured layer thicknesses together with a simulation-derived collection efficiency for the near-normal dark-matter emission mode after the optics are fixed by laser calibration.

What would settle it

A statistically significant excess that matches the calibrated focal-plane template in new stack-on data (or a clear mismatch between the TEM-based boost factor and an independent measurement of the stack’s conversion response) would refute or revise the reported limit.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A multi-stack architecture with stacks tuned to common laser wavelengths can extend the same template method across a broader mass band while adding relative-amplitude information for mass localization.
  • The spatial-template analysis already improves sensitivity by roughly a factor of two over pure counting in the same ROI, so future modules can keep the imaging readout rather than summing photons.
  • Room-temperature operation removes cryogenic overhead, making replicated dielectric-stack modules coupled to a common CMOS a practical path for larger optical-frequency dark-photon searches.
  • An illustrative four-stack projection with modest hardware upgrades improves the kinetic-mixing reach by one to two orders of magnitude relative to the present prototype.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the method works at room temperature with commercial CMOS sensors, it could be scaled into an array of many small modules more readily than cryogenic cavity or skipper-CCD experiments of comparable optical mass.
  • The same calibrated focal-plane morphology that rejects background could later serve as a real-time veto or trigger if a candidate appears in one of several differently tuned stacks.
  • If inflationary production of dark photons is correct, a future detection near 2 eV would imply an inflationary Hubble scale around 10^{12} GeV, a regime inaccessible to colliders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a room-temperature dielectric multilayer optical-haloscope search for dark-photon dark matter (SPECTRA). A 47-pair TiO2/SiO2 stack on sapphire enhances conversion near 2 eV; a focusing lens and cooled CMOS image the near-normal emission. In-situ laser calibrations (Cal-I/II/III) fix the per-pixel DN-to-electron response, optical geometry, end-to-end efficiency ϵ(ω0)=18.8%, and a morphed spatial template. With 904 h stack-on and 404 h stack-off data, a macro-pixel Poisson–Gaussian profile-likelihood analysis with Feldman–Cousins toy calibration finds no excess matching the pre-fixed template and sets a 90% CL limit κ<4.0×10^{-13} at mA′c2=1.9 eV (most sensitive point). The spatial template improves the limit by a factor of ~2 relative to pure counting in the same ROI. A conservative multi-stack projection is also shown.

Significance. The result is a carefully executed null search that places a competitive laboratory constraint on local DPDM near 2 eV with a compact, room-temperature apparatus. Strengths include the blinded template-based analysis, TEM-measured as-built boost factor (rather than idealized design), end-to-end laser anchoring of efficiency, sideband DN-offset correction, and non-asymptotic Feldman–Cousins calibration. The demonstration that a calibrated focal-plane morphology improves sensitivity by a factor of two, and the clear multi-stack spectral-coverage outlook, make the work a useful prototype for scalable eV-scale optical-haloscope searches. The central claim is a falsifiable, well-documented experimental limit rather than a model-dependent reinterpretation.

minor comments (5)
  1. Fig. 2 and Eq. (2): the boost-factor band from TEM thickness fluctuations is shown, but the main-text limit curve uses only the central TEM profile. A short sentence stating whether the band is folded into the quoted κ limit or treated only as a conservative choice of central value would clarify the final systematic treatment.
  2. Table S1 and Sec. S4: the detector-side systematic budget is given as ≤13.1% on √sig. Explicitly stating how this is (or is not) inflated into the final κ limit, and whether the boost-factor band is added in quadrature, would help readers reproduce the quoted number.
  3. Fig. 4 caption and multi-stack projection: the dotted red curve is described as “conservative four-stack reach” based only on total yield. A parenthetical note that relative-amplitude information is not used in the projection (as stated in S5) would avoid over-reading the curve.
  4. Notation: the same symbol ϵ is used for overall detection efficiency and, in places, for relative efficiency ϵ(z). Distinguishing them (e.g., ϵ_tot vs ϵ_rel) would reduce ambiguity when reading Eq. (2) against the likelihood in S3.
  5. Minor typographical consistency: “room-temperature” vs “room temperature,” and the arXiv date stamp “July 7, 2026” should be checked against the intended publication date.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: null-result limit from independent calibration and blinded stack-on vs stack-off data

full rationale

This is a standard experimental null-result paper. The 90% CL upper limit on κ is extracted from a frequentist profile-likelihood analysis of 904 h stack-on science data versus 404 h stack-off control data, using a spatial template and end-to-end efficiency fixed before unblinding from independent laser calibrations (Cal-I/II/III) plus optical simulation of the DPDM-like emission mode. The boost factor β is computed from the TEM-measured as-built layer thicknesses via the standard transfer-matrix formalism (external code and theory), not fitted to the science exposures; local DM density and polarization average are conventional external inputs. No parameter is fitted to a subset of the search data and then re-presented as a prediction of a related quantity; the spatial template improves discrimination relative to pure counting but is not self-definitional. Self-citations are limited to ordinary acknowledgments of prior methods and do not load-bear the central claim. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 3 axioms · 1 invented entities

The exclusion rests on the standard kinetic-mixing Lagrangian, the local DM density and polarization average, the transfer-matrix conversion formula evaluated on TEM thicknesses, and the end-to-end optical efficiency measured in situ. No new particles or forces are postulated; SPECTRA is an experimental architecture name.

free parameters (4)
  • local DM density ρ = 0.4 GeV/cm³
    Fixed to the conventional 0.4 GeV cm^{-3} in Eq. 2; the limit scales as 1/√ρ.
  • polarization average ⟨cos²θ⟩ = 2/3
    Set to 2/3 for randomly polarized DPDM (standard assumption cited from Caputo et al.).
  • overall detection efficiency ε(ω₀) = 18.8%
    Anchored by Cal-III weak-light measurement plus simulation-derived collection efficiency; enters the signal normalization linearly.
  • lens-to-CMOS focus coordinate z = 77.42^{+0.06}_{-0.30} mm
    Fitted from laser pattern matching; used to morph the signal template and assign the dominant ROI-collection systematic.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption Dark photons constitute a coherent, non-relativistic oscillating field whose conversion to photons is described by the kinetic-mixing Lagrangian of Eq. 1 and the dielectric-haloscope boost factor of Refs. [33,38].
    Invoked throughout the signal model (Introduction and Eq. 2).
  • domain assumption The stack-off background run correctly models the instrumental background of the stack-on science run after a small sideband DN-offset correction.
    Central to the likelihood construction in Sec. S3.
  • domain assumption TEM-measured layer thicknesses and their fluctuations provide a conservative as-built boost factor β.
    Explicitly adopted for the limit calculation (Fig. 2 caption and Sec. S1).
invented entities (1)
  • SPECTRA architecture no independent evidence
    purpose: Name for the room-temperature dielectric-stack + CMOS imaging + template-inference platform.
    An experimental configuration, not a new physical entity; no independent-evidence claim beyond the present data.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 21262 in / 2622 out tokens · 32646 ms · 2026-07-12T03:52:37.679764+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We present a search for dark-photon dark matter with a room-temperature dielectric multilayer haloscope. The dielectric stack enhances photon conversion near 2 eV, and a spatially resolved CMOS focal plane records the emitted photons with few-photon sensitivity. We calibrate the stack-lens-CMOS response in situ and use the calibrated focal-plane pattern in a template-based inference. With 904 h of search data and 404 h of background-control data, we observe no excess and set a 90% confidence-level upper limit of $\kappa < 4.0\times10^{-13}$ for dark-photon dark matter with mass 1.9$\,\mathrm{eV}/c^2$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.03240 by Alexandros Spiliotis, Husheng Guan, Paschos Ioannis, Pavlos G. Savvidis, Shengchao Li, Siyin Li, Zhengyin Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the SPECTRA prototype. The core [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The DPDM conversion boost factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Observed Cal-III patterns in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. SPECTRA prototype exclusion limit on dark-photon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Arias, D

    P. Arias, D. Cadamuro, M. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, J. Re- dondo, and A. Ringwald, WISPy Cold Dark Matter, JCAP06(06), 013, arXiv:1201.5902 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  2. [2]

    P. W. Graham, K. D. Irwin, J. Mardon, S. Rajendran, and K. M. Zurek, Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65, 485 (2015), arXiv:1506.07532 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Fabbrichesi, E

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi,The 6 Dark Photon(Springer, 2020) arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  4. [4]

    Caputo, A

    A. Caputo, A. J. Millar, C. A. J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano, Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D104, 095029 (2021), arXiv:2105.04565 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys

    B. Holdom, Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts, Phys. Lett. B166, 196 (1986)

    1986

  6. [6]

    A. E. Nelson and J. Scholtz, Dark light, dark matter and the misalignment mechanism, Phys. Rev. D84, 103501 (2011)

    2011

  7. [7]

    Redondo and A

    J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, Light shining through walls, Contemp. Phys.52, 211 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    S. L. Dubovsky, V. A. Rubakov, and P. G. Tinyakov, Is the electric charge conserved?, JETP Lett.68, 107 (1998), hep-th/9803070

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    S. A. Abel, M. D. Goodsell, J. Jaeckel, V. V. Khoze, and A. Ringwald, Kinetic mixing of the photon with hidden u(1)s in string phenomenology, JHEP07(07), 124

  10. [10]

    Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, Production of purely gravitational dark matter: The case of fermion and vector boson, JHEP07(07), 060, arXiv:1903.10973 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1903

  11. [11]

    Dimopoulos, T

    S. Dimopoulos, T. Markkanen, and A. Rajantie, Primor- dial magnetogenesis from inflation with scalar gauge cou- pling, JHEP11(11), 038

  12. [12]

    R. R. Caldwell and C. Devulder, Axion gauge field dy- namics in an expanding universe, Phys. Rev. D83, 045021 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    L. H. Ford, Inflation driven by a vector field, Phys. Rev. D40, 967 (1989)

    1989

  14. [14]

    R. T. Co, A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, and Y. Zhao, Dark photon dark matter produced by axion oscillations, Phys. Rev. D99, 075002 (2019), arXiv:1810.07196 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Bastero-Gil, J

    M. Bastero-Gil, J. Santiago, L. Ubaldi, and R. Vega- Morales, Vector dark matter production at the end of inflation, JCAP04(04), 015, arXiv:1810.07208 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997)

    1997

  17. [17]

    B. R. Greene, L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobin- sky, Structure of resonance in preheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56, 6175 (1997)

    1997

  18. [18]

    Agrawal, N

    P. Agrawal, N. Kitajima, M. Reece, T. Sekiguchi, and F. Takahashi, Relic abundance of dark photon dark mat- ter, Phys. Lett. B801, 135136 (2020), arXiv:1810.07188 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    A. J. Long and L.-T. Wang, Dark photon dark mat- ter from a network of cosmic strings, Phys. Rev. D99, 063529 (2019), arXiv:1901.03312 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Vilenkin and E

    A. Vilenkin and E. Shellard,Cosmic Strings and Other Topological Defects(Cambridge University Press, 1994)

    1994

  21. [21]

    Horns, J

    D. Horns, J. Jaeckel, A. Lindner, A. Lobanov, J. Re- dondo, and A. Ringwald, Searching for WISPy Cold Dark Matter with a Dish Antenna, JCAP04(04), 016, arXiv:1212.2970 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  22. [22]

    Tanget al.(SHANHE), First Scan Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Tunable Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity, Phys

    Z. Tanget al.(SHANHE), First Scan Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter with a Tunable Superconducting Radio-Frequency Cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 021005 (2024), arXiv:2305.09711 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Heet al.(APEX), Dark photon constraints from a 7.139 GHz cavity haloscope experiment, Phys

    D. Heet al.(APEX), Dark photon constraints from a 7.139 GHz cavity haloscope experiment, Phys. Rev. D 110, L021101 (2024), arXiv:2404.00908 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Ghosh, E

    S. Ghosh, E. P. Ruddy, M. J. Jewell, A. F. Leder, and R. H. Maruyama, Searching for dark photons with ex- isting haloscope data, Phys. Rev. D104, 092016 (2021), arXiv:2104.09334 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    R. Kang, Q. Hu, X. Cai, W. Yu, J. Zhou, X. Rong, and J. Du, Scalable architecture for dark photon searches: Superconducting-qubit proof of principle (2025), arXiv:2503.18315 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Xuet al., Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search, Commun

    Z. Xuet al., Constraining ultralight dark matter through an accelerated resonant search, Commun. Phys.7, 226 (2024), arXiv:2309.16600 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Y. Chen, C. Li, Y. Liu, J. Shu, Y. Yang, and Y. Zeng, Simultaneous Resonant and Broadband Detection of Ul- tralight Dark Matter and High-Frequency Gravitational WavesviaCavitiesandCircuits(2023),arXiv:2309.12387 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Agrawalet al., Stimulated Emission of Signal Photons from Dark Matter Waves, Phys

    A. Agrawalet al., Stimulated Emission of Signal Photons from Dark Matter Waves, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 140801 (2024), arXiv:2307.11107 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    M. Liu, Z. Mi, P. Sha, W. Pan, J. Shu, Z. Tang, C. Li, F. He, and L. Ye, Application of superconducting cavity tuner in dark photon dark matter search, Radiat. Detect. Technol. Methods8, 1390 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations, Phys. Rev. D93, 103520 (2016), arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Cyncynates and N

    D. Cyncynates and N. Weiner, Experimental targets for dark photon dark matter, Phys. Rev. D111, 103535 (2025), arXiv:2410.14774 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Cyncynates and N

    D. Cyncynates and N. Weiner, Detectable and defect-free dark photon dark matter, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 211002 (2025), arXiv:2310.18397 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Baryakhtar, J

    M. Baryakhtar, J. Huang, and R. Lasenby, Axion and hidden photon dark matter detection with multilayer optical haloscopes, Phys. Rev. D98, 035006 (2018), arXiv:1803.11455 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Manentiet al., Search for dark photons using a multi- layer dielectric haloscope equipped with a single-photon avalanche diode, Phys

    L. Manentiet al., Search for dark photons using a multi- layer dielectric haloscope equipped with a single-photon avalanche diode, Phys. Rev. D105, 052010 (2022), arXiv:2110.10497 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Bigas, E

    M. Bigas, E. Cabruja, J. Forest, and J. Salvi, Review of CMOS Image Sensors, Microelectronics Journal37, 433 (2006)

    2006

  36. [36]

    Barak, I

    L. Barak, I. M. Bloch, M. Cababie, G. Cancelo, L. Chap- linsky, F. Chierchie, M. Crisler, A. Drlica-Wagner, R. Es- sig, J. Estrada, E. Etzion, G. F. Moroni, D. Gift, S. Mu- nagavalasa, A. Orly, D. Rodrigues, A. Singal, M. S. Haro, L. Stefanazzi, J. Tiffenberg, S. Uemura, T. Volansky, and T.-T. Yu (SENSEI Collaboration), Sensei: Direct- detectionresultsons...

    2020

  37. [37]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for stack fabrication and characterization, pixel calibration, optical simulations, statistical infer- ence, data-analysis checks, and the multi-stack outlook

  38. [38]

    A. J. Millar, G. G. Raffelt, J. Redondo, and F. D. Steffen, Dielectric Haloscopes to Search for Axion Dark Matter: Theoretical Foundations, JCAP01(01), 061, arXiv:1612.07057 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  39. [39]

    Kogelnik and T

    H. Kogelnik and T. Li, Laser Beams and Resonators, Appl. Opt.5, 1550 (1966)

    1966

  40. [40]

    Chiles, I

    J. Chiles, I. Charaev, R. Lasenby, M. Baryakhtar, J. Huang, A. Roshko, G. Burton, M. Colangelo, K. Van Tilburg, A. Arvanitaki, S. W. Nam, and K. K. Berggren, New constraints on dark photon dark matter with superconducting nanowire detectors in an optical haloscope, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 231802 (2022). 7

    2022

  41. [41]

    Aguilar-Arevalo, D

    A. Aguilar-Arevalo, D. Amidei, D. Baxter, G. Cancelo, B. Cervantes Vergara, A. Chavarria, E. Darragh-Ford, J. de Mello Neto, J. D’Olivo, J. Estrada,et al., Con- straints on light dark matter particles interacting with electrons from damic at snolab, Physical review letters 123, 181802 (2019), arXiv:1907.12628 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  42. [42]

    H. An, M. Pospelov, J. Pradler, and A. Ritz, New limits on dark photons from solar emission and kev scale dark matter, Phys. Rev. D102, 115022 (2020)

    2020

  43. [43]

    Aprileet al.(XENON), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys

    E. Aprileet al.(XENON), Emission of single and few electrons in XENON1T and limits on light dark matter, Phys. Rev. D106, 022001 (2022), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 110, 109903 (2024)], arXiv:2112.12116 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    Li and X.-J

    S.-P. Li and X.-J. Xu, Production rates of dark photons and Z’ in the sun and stellar cooling bounds, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2023(09), 009, arXiv:2304.12907 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Harrison, Optiland (2026), version 0.6.0

    K. Harrison, Optiland (2026), version 0.6.0

    2026

  46. [46]

    8 Supplemental Material: Searching for Dark Photons with a Room-Temperature Dielectric Haloscope S1 ST ACK F ABRICA TION AND TEM CHARACTERIZA TION Stack fabrication

    Ansys, Inc., Ansys Zemax OpticStudio (2026). 8 Supplemental Material: Searching for Dark Photons with a Room-Temperature Dielectric Haloscope S1 ST ACK F ABRICA TION AND TEM CHARACTERIZA TION Stack fabrication. We fabricated the dielectric conversion medium on a double-side-polished 1-inch (25.4mm) sapphire substrate with thickness 430µm and surface rough...

    2026