Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

As of 14 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 28 of 28 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2509.06936.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2509.06936 v1

Coverage vector

measured 28 of 28 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.659674Z

measured 29 of 29 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: pith, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.717732Z

Reference resolution

28 of 28 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact2
  • verified fuzzy23
  • unresolved3
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 12e666c3-9704-45c1-8540-ae88bf149487 · outbound

This paper cites Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.723874Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z digest=sha256:84c3216625e32139304fac8bb01af331cb988175270fab6d6fe0151164bddc25

Observation 4a7a270c-3eb3-4f5e-b9b3-9f1f6687da45 · outbound

This paper cites Low” (0,0.33), “Moderate.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Low” (0,0.33), “Moderate

Reference 2

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.026721Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.566492Z digest=sha256:766b881bae75a252202ddc727e86953ba6c2f7e5df06083613829975217df6fe

Observation 5d815927-1a2f-4ec2-99b3-12f321057596 · outbound

This paper cites We start from the full collection.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets We start from the full collection

Reference 3

Resolution
verified exact
doi, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.013747Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.570652Z digest=sha256:38c64ee8a5b060f9f3a73120107885b0333f70fced9e148dbb58b87240389cdf

Observation cb953dfa-a6da-47e4-a266-df0bddbeeea1 · outbound

This paper cites ForMGPHot we use our proposed split.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets ForMGPHot we use our proposed split

Reference 4

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:04.000991Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.574483Z digest=sha256:72eb20011f8c79ab707adc3c5427d6967387a0b1ce8170886c5f70ba8ff7254a

Observation bd3ec1cd-d120-4562-bb68-1242b6beaaf1 · outbound

This paper cites Instrument.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Instrument

Reference 5

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.988979Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.578398Z digest=sha256:8d6bb8db8a678f06e37d2e252c07197e36d18b4310d22765b33ee96e8d720f3b

Observation 180e3deb-eceb-4676-9f18-f0d378b106eb · outbound

This paper cites This distribution of win- ners indicates that there is no single reliable choice.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets This distribution of win- ners indicates that there is no single reliable choice

Reference 6

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.976864Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.582448Z digest=sha256:1bf2fe28f1ebb5724064ba1ecc71787af49ec50db88f0fecbdee02042e904d5c

Observation 1ff0d24e-3c2a-491f-afbf-19c5dfbf64bb · outbound

This paper cites IA y M´usica: C ´atedra en Inteligen- cia Artificial y M ´usica.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets IA y M´usica: C ´atedra en Inteligen- cia Artificial y M ´usica

Reference 7

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.962843Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.586321Z digest=sha256:df9f4d16036dd8ded92f67c4a862a1379383fbf229f800d4b9a232f9c1f61240

Observation 253a4780-b460-4b41-8402-7eac92a2d171 · outbound

This paper cites Automatic tagging of audio: The state-of-the-art,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Automatic tagging of audio: The state-of-the-art,

Reference 8

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.950523Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.589865Z digest=sha256:a87956908055de5f4d365c1a2468f4e33f94e569022ed964736c2c01b275d094

Observation d44bb64d-c559-491f-8068-9e5c67992f56 · outbound

This paper cites A survey of tagging techniques for music, speech and environmental sound,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets A survey of tagging techniques for music, speech and environmental sound,

Reference 9

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.938281Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.593349Z digest=sha256:64b6d0ef89f82a99a451b701074b18f3b1b45cf05a9dda0267b1b307dba1ad80

Observation 6bac585e-1a56-4d9e-8a1f-13f9ff890c7d · outbound

This paper cites Three current issues in music autotagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Three current issues in music autotagging,

Reference 10

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.925396Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.596837Z digest=sha256:82fc45ae82de5acf09fcc555ff759a159eae05427927fc177dfb0ccb69ae443a

Observation 8957a392-5c0f-4b49-8013-ffe54c0ec903 · outbound

This paper cites Supervised and unsupervised learning of audio representations for music understanding,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Supervised and unsupervised learning of audio representations for music understanding,

Reference 11

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.912328Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.600504Z digest=sha256:98b2bcc00e69eec6cdacd27d5bf8da2cb3b602933f1d2208a964b291061bcd07

Observation 5ca136b1-a901-4110-838c-4f6a64f914d7 · outbound

This paper cites Foundation Models for Music: A Survey.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Foundation Models for Music: A Survey

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.604395Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.604395Z digest=sha256:95506499b1b51eec5c548fc0e7edebf0702f581cf96d24b9692b3efd2c6817a9

Observation c6b5db43-a3ed-401e-97cc-0a5a4312bb8f · outbound

This paper cites Musical genre classification of audio signals,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Musical genre classification of audio signals,

Reference 13

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.608240Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.608240Z digest=sha256:069153b2e569e1c561d49c7c02627e3a5d2eef4f05463e8d1875cb37d27443e0

Observation 5fd2b9b3-9825-435b-ad0e-fc0d81462c19 · outbound

This paper cites The latin music database,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The latin music database,

Reference 14

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.891227Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.611997Z digest=sha256:89ab51ffce0e636aae769d09a47723a1d46bd02a6ff2eafd0e979812899eefe5

Observation 96d81995-77fb-436a-b62d-bf13c9d5c8af · outbound

This paper cites Cross- collection evaluation for music classification tasks,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Cross- collection evaluation for music classification tasks,

Reference 15

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.880070Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.615401Z digest=sha256:d11456706477a7cde7054b295562719c112b9404c7cc15e5c4dc46d5ee6155be

Observation d054bc9a-d936-4894-bb9b-e27780045d59 · outbound

This paper cites The GTZAN dataset: Its contents, its faults, their effects on evaluation, and its future use.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The GTZAN dataset: Its contents, its faults, their effects on evaluation, and its future use

Reference 16

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.618998Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.618998Z digest=sha256:c861f98554f0e24acadc76e70cebf16d3543b8909b8777c42d8813a09b53c6ef

Observation 7eeb57e8-b610-4dea-95ed-d61307eb1c22 · outbound

This paper cites Faults in the latin music database and with its use,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Faults in the latin music database and with its use,

Reference 17

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.868463Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.622857Z digest=sha256:42cbc3d39efa89f8c74726f0d1db1b247ac65435da49d8ebf0090f01909b0060

Observation 95260399-3f50-4713-ad64-f16dfec148ad · outbound

This paper cites Evaluation of algorithms using games: The case of mu- sic tagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Evaluation of algorithms using games: The case of mu- sic tagging,

Reference 18

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.857691Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.626237Z digest=sha256:050c10ee2c93b8a04207addc586edc76eab6fb232a707d22074fceff5315aef6

Observation 3f518fbd-b0a5-47ef-a358-c8857f84c9fe · outbound

This paper cites The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic mu- sic tagging,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets The mtg-jamendo dataset for automatic mu- sic tagging,

Reference 19

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.845806Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.629671Z digest=sha256:19ccd3bdccdcef56c02db5106a634ae1a7f28c7470399dacd88216ecb9f04cc3

Observation b6cf0bc5-4b94-4430-a2cf-4433866ac7f2 · outbound

This paper cites Mgphot: A dataset of musicological anno- tations for popular music (1958–2022),.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Mgphot: A dataset of musicological anno- tations for popular music (1958–2022),

Reference 20

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.833821Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.632875Z digest=sha256:d8876088e7b979c9fbea4a3a09f11d110c427d4d36bcbad56f64a34024b7296d

Observation 4a83dff5-6ba5-445b-aeff-0932a2074f65 · outbound

This paper cites Robust speech recogni- tion via large-scale weak supervision,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Robust speech recogni- tion via large-scale weak supervision,

Reference 21

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.822426Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.636161Z digest=sha256:2defc6fe8f0b2343566f18a04e6f0a29750f3c6822e977b7ac9c674c80d131a2

Observation 2790c0a5-edce-4f2e-bac5-5fbe45ec15ad · outbound

This paper cites Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Large-scale contrastive language-audio pretraining with feature fusion and keyword-to-caption augmentation,

Reference 22

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.810246Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.639691Z digest=sha256:96d9cf45b58220bf2a0eb741b2d061a3ddfa31aa960c1fb9975321ab6324fc18

Observation de86f960-0bd7-447f-a5ed-2fa6a8bfb9ee · outbound

This paper cites Efficient supervised training of audio transformers for music rep- resentation learning,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Efficient supervised training of audio transformers for music rep- resentation learning,

Reference 23

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.798607Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.642891Z digest=sha256:af90e89daf1d484891359cca0bc2e2fbc31876b52bb28e4e4be178855d55a3a0

Observation 3712e6ec-0288-4000-bb0f-7c603cef87b9 · outbound

This paper cites Mert: Acoustic music un- derstanding model with large-scale self-supervised train- ing,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Mert: Acoustic music un- derstanding model with large-scale self-supervised train- ing,

Reference 24

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.785698Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.646205Z digest=sha256:d92173147e4b5919e02436444cd9ba58ae0a929e196413dfd7ed9e8aa2918a86

Observation 14ab5446-24d9-44a5-a355-c82ecc59c7fa · outbound

This paper cites A foundation model for music informatics,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets A foundation model for music informatics,

Reference 25

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.773307Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.649535Z digest=sha256:d41052e7d0fc7bd638f26b966413ee2974372f2803cb94338741e5775b95365a

Observation a70991f6-2ab3-4005-94b9-ddc6e8dfc844 · outbound

This paper cites OMAR-RQ: Open music audio representation model trained with multi-feature masked token prediction,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets OMAR-RQ: Open music audio representation model trained with multi-feature masked token prediction,

Reference 26

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.760932Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.652972Z digest=sha256:13c166578464619590f811ad890946007f4bdb2849857923662a0909fe7940b3

Observation 1cbb177c-eb55-4f39-80ae-ba2703c18845 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Qwen2.5: A party of foundation models,

Reference 27

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.748447Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.656403Z digest=sha256:292a75c9628eeb4ad204efd4d6b3d5faff58f11ed289abd24d3d236a7f0395ad

Observation d715fab7-8ef7-4cfd-9f09-ca44868ab883 · outbound

This paper cites Green mir?: Investigating computational cost of recent music- ai research in ismir,.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Green mir?: Investigating computational cost of recent music- ai research in ismir,

Reference 28

Resolution
verified fuzzy
raw_fallback, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.736626Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.659674Z digest=sha256:2adc94c57c1414f1846f4cd9fc795c3c13fb066b2c36796f79d516e2143c5b3e

Pith citing papers

Observation 12e666c3-9704-45c1-8540-ae88bf149487 · inbound

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets cites this paper.

Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets Benchmarking Music Autotagging with MGPHot Expert Annotations vs. Generic Tag Datasets

Reference 1

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-08-04T22:55:03.723874Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-14T06:32:32.682623+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-04T22:55:03.561593Z digest=sha256:84c3216625e32139304fac8bb01af331cb988175270fab6d6fe0151164bddc25