Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 49 references

Coherence of Symmetry-Protected Rotational Qubits in Cold Polyatomic Molecules

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Symmetry-protected rotational qubits in cold formaldehyde show ~100 microsecond coherence, with immunity to electric-field magnitude.

desk verdict A clean experimental demonstration of a symmetry-protected rotational qubit in trapped formaldehyde, with the magnetic-field quantum-beat data doing the heavy lifting; worth sending to a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.00775 v1 pith:ELAMZ4CL submitted 2024-12-01 physics.atom-ph physics.chem-phquant-ph

Maximilian Löw , Martin Ibrügger , Gerhard Rempe , Martin Zeppenfeld This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.atom-phphysics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords symmetry-protectedqubitcoldmoleculesformaldehyderotationalcoherenceRamseyspectroscopyelectrictrapquantumbeatstime-reversalsymmetry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a demonstration of a symmetry-protected rotational qubit in trapped cold formaldehyde molecules. The qubit is formed by two degenerate states that rotate in opposite directions but have the same spatial orientation, so they are a quasi-hidden degree of freedom. Using pairs of radio-frequency pulses, the authors observe coherent quantum beats between the two states with a decay time of about 95 microseconds, limited by molecules moving out of resonance rather than by intrinsic decoherence. Because any electric-field interaction along the field axis commutes with both time reversal and angular momentum projection, the qubit energy splitting is insensitive to the magnitude of the electric field. The result suggests that such opposite-rotation state pairs could serve as long-lived qubits in noisy electric environments.

What carries the argument

The central object is the degenerate pair |J,Ka,Kc,±1> of rotational states, which are mapped onto each other by time reversal T̂ but carry opposite angular-momentum projection Jz. Because T̂ and Jz commute with the molecular Hamiltonian yet anticommute with each other, any interaction that also commutes with both — such as an electric field along the quantization axis — leaves the pair degenerate, making the qubit immune to field magnitude. The experiment drives these states to one of two M=0 states, forming a V-type three-level system with a bright and a dark superposition state |Φ±> = (|+1> ± $e^{{i2φ}}$|-1>)/√2; the dark state is decoupled from the RF field, and the second pulse's extra depletion signals decoherence between the two. The double-pulse depletion signal, together with the magnetic-field-induced quantum beats, is the observable that carries the argument.

What would settle it

Measure the double-pulse depletion with circularly polarized RF, which should couple both superpositions and remove the dark-state protection; if the second-pulse depletion still shows the same delay dependence, the bright/dark-state model is wrong. Alternatively, repeat at much colder temperature with trapped individual molecules; a decay time that remains near 100 microseconds rather than growing would indicate an intrinsic decoherence source the paper does not identify.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that opposite-rotation partner states of a closed-shell polyatomic molecule can serve as symmetry-protected qubits with coherence times much longer than the interaction time with any electric field. The authors verify this in formaldehyde by preparing superpositions of the |+1> and |-1> states and detecting the depletion caused by a second RF pulse after a variable delay. Under a ~15 G magnetic field they observe Larmor precession between even and odd superposition states at ~44 kHz, with a decay constant of 95 ± 4 microseconds that tracks molecular motion, establishing an actual coherent superposition rather than a statistical mixture. The qubit is by construction insensitive to the magnitude of the external electric field, since the field commutes with the symmetry that protects the pair.

Load-bearing premise

The experiment's extraction of a coherence time assumes the RF field linearly polarizes the transition so that an exactly decoupled dark state exists, and that a saturated pulse equilibrates only the bright-state population; if the dark state is partially coupled or the pulse is not fully saturating, the depletion contrast no longer maps simply to coherence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent superpositions of opposite-rotation states can be prepared, stored, and read out in a noisy electric environment, making them candidates for robust molecular qubits.
  • The qubit splitting is independent of electric field magnitude, so electric-field noise and stray fields do not limit its coherence; only magnetic field inhomogeneity and geometric phases matter.
  • The same state pairs are relevant for searches for electric dipole moments of the electron and nuclear Schiff moments, and the quantum-beat method offers a way to measure molecular g-factors and hyperfine structure.
  • Coherence times should increase substantially in a trap with less motion or with individual molecules, since the observed decay is attributed to molecules leaving resonance, not to intrinsic decoherence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry protection should extend to other closed-shell polyatomic molecules, not just formaldehyde; any near-symmetric-top rotor with a degenerate |±M> pair should show the same electric-field insensitivity, so the result is a generic testbed rather than a single-species effect.
  • A direct test of the claimed lower bound on coherence would be to repeat the measurement with molecules pinned in space (e.g., in an optical lattice or with lighter samples) or with Raman sideband cooling to reduce motion; if the decay constant then grows by orders of magnitude, the motion-limited interpretation is confirmed.
  • The bright/dark-state approach could be adapted to measure not only decoherence but also the relative phase acquired between the two states, turning the setup into a Ramsey spectrometer for molecular g-factors or for time-reversal-violating interactions.
  • If the magnetic-field inhomogeneity were reduced (e.g., by a Helmholtz pair), the quantum-beat damping should become much slower, offering a clean way to separate motion-induced decay from genuine decoherence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports a Ramsey-type double-pulse experiment on trapped cold formaldehyde molecules (H2CO) in an electrostatic trap, demonstrating coherent superpositions between the M=+1 and M=-1 rotational states of the |1,1,0> and |2,2,0> manifolds. Because these opposite-rotation states are related by time-reversal symmetry and remain degenerate in an electric field, their energy splitting is insensitive to the electric-field magnitude. The authors observe a motion-limited depletion-recovery signal with a decay constant of about 51 µs at 600 mK and, after Sisyphus cooling to 100 mK, a quantum-beat oscillation at 44.2 kHz in an applied magnetic field of about 15 G. The oscillation frequency matches the expected Zeeman splitting for formaldehyde, providing direct evidence for coherent precession between the symmetry-protected states. The paper explicitly states that the measured decay constants are lower bounds on the coherence time, limited by molecular motion out of the resonant trap region.

Significance. If the result holds, it is a significant experimental step: it demonstrates a genuinely coherent superposition of opposite-rotation states in a polyatomic molecule, a 'quasi-hidden' degree of freedom that is protected by symmetry from electric-field noise. The manuscript is strengthened by the quantum-beat measurement, which independently confirms the coherence interpretation that alone could not be established by the double-pulse depletion signal. The quantitative agreement between the observed beat frequency and the known Zeeman response of formaldehyde is a particularly convincing check. The paper is also self-critical and transparent about the motion-limited nature of the observed decay, providing honest interpretation of the data. These are strengths that support the central claim.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'the observed qubit is insensitive to the magnitude of an external electric field,' but the experiment does not vary the electric field. This property follows from symmetry arguments, and the observation of coherence in the trap's inhomogeneous field is consistent with it, but the wording might be read as a directly measured dependence. Please rephrase to distinguish the theoretical design property from the experimental evidence.
  2. [Introduction and Figure 1(a)] The text says the M=+1 and M=-1 states have 'identical orientation' in space. From the Supplementary Material wavefunctions, the expectation value of the electric dipole moment along the field direction is opposite for the two states when ϵ>0 (i.e., in the presence of an offset field). If 'orientation' is intended to refer to the time-averaged axis distribution rather than the dipole vector, this should be stated explicitly to avoid a misleading classical picture.
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The fitting function used for the quantum-beat data is not specified in the caption or the text. Providing the explicit functional form (e.g., damped sinusoid with a single decay constant) in the caption or the Supplemental Material would improve reproducibility.
  4. [Abstract and Conclusion] The phrase 'long-lived (~100 µs) coherences' could be more precise by adding 'at least' or 'lower bound', since the observed exponential decay is explicitly attributed to molecular motion rather than to intrinsic decoherence. The main text is clear on this point, but the abstract is slightly ambiguous.
  5. [Reference [41]] Reference [41] is an arXiv preprint by the same group; if a peer-reviewed version is available at the time of publication, it would be appropriate to cite that version.
  6. [Supplemental Material header] The header of the Supplemental Material contains an obvious typographical error: 'SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL' should read 'SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the coherence claim rests on measured quantum-beat oscillations and standard symmetry arguments, not on fitted inputs or self-cited premises.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—observation of long-lived coherence between |+1> and |-1> rotational states—is established by the magnetic-field quantum-beat experiment in Fig. 3, where the 44.2 kHz oscillation cannot be produced by an incoherent population effect and is consistent with the known formaldehyde Zeeman response cited from Hüttner et al. [47]. The double-pulse depletion data alone are explicitly acknowledged not to distinguish decoherence from molecular motion, and the paper does not overinterpret them: it calls the extracted decay constant a lower limit and excludes fast-decoherence alternatives 'based on theory' (standard bright/dark-state quantum optics, derived self-contained in the Supplemental Material). The insensitivity of the qubit to electric-field magnitude follows from the T and Jz symmetry argument presented in the text itself, not from the same-group quasi-hidden-DOF proposal [41]; reference [41] frames the concept but is not load-bearing for the experimental derivation. The only same-group citations concern trap/cooling/detection apparatus ([S2], [S3], [S4], [43]) and the framework paper [41], none of which supplies a fitted parameter or a uniqueness constraint that forces the result. No step was found where an output is defined in terms of its input, or where a fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The paper is therefore self-contained against an external benchmark (the literature Zeeman frequency) and exhibits no circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the symmetry argument (standard), the V-type three-level model for RF coupling (domain-specific), the saturated-pulse depletion model (domain-specific), and the motion-limited-decay interpretation (specific to this apparatus). No new physical entities are introduced. The fitted decay constants and oscillation frequency are empirical characterizations of the signal, not inputs to the core derivation.

free parameters (3)
  • Exponential decay constant tau_1 = 51.1 +/- 2.8 microseconds
    Fitted to the double-pulse depletion contrast in Fig. 2 for |1,1,0,+/-1> at 600 mK; interpreted as the timescale for molecules moving out of resonance, not as a coherence time.
  • Exponential decay/damping constant tau_2 = 95 +/- 4 microseconds
    Single parameter used for both exponential decay and oscillation damping in Fig. 3 for |2,2,0,+/-1> at 100 mK; the paper states decay and damping are not statistically different.
  • Oscillation frequency f_osc = 44.2 +/- 0.1 kHz
    Frequency of the quantum-beat oscillations in Fig. 3; used to demonstrate Larmor precession and compared with the expected Zeeman splitting from the literature for about 15 G.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math Time reversal T and J_z commute with the molecular Hamiltonian and anticommute with each other, making +/-M eigenstates exactly degenerate and forming a symmetry-protected qubit.
    Invoked in the main text after Fig. 1(a) to define the protected qubit; this is a standard symmetry argument.
  • domain assumption Formaldehyde can be treated as a near-prolate asymmetric top whose |J,Ka,Kc,M> states are well approximated by symmetric-top basis states with only K=+/-Ka contributions.
    Used in the Supplemental Material to derive bright/dark states and transition matrix elements; neglects other K terms.
  • domain assumption A linearly polarized RF field with a component perpendicular to the quantization axis creates a V-type three-level system with an exactly decoupled dark state |Phi+>.
    Central to the double-pulse depletion scheme; derived in the Supplemental Material assuming only Delta M=+/-1 perpendicular components matter.
  • domain assumption The first saturated RF pulse equilibrates population only between the M=0 state and the bright superposition, leaving the dark state population unchanged, and molecules transferred to M=0 are untrapped and lost.
    Required to interpret reduced depletion from the second pulse as evidence of a preserved dark state and coherence; described around Fig. 1(c) and the experimental details.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed decay of the double-pulse signal with Delta t is dominated by molecules moving out of the resonant trap-center region rather than by decoherence.
    The paper argues this from the small single-pulse depletion (about 3%) and the increased decay time for a colder, slower sample; this is an interpretive assumption specific to the experiment, not independently measured.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Coherence of Symmetry-Protected Rotational Qubits in Cold Polyatomic Molecules." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ELAMZ4CL

@misc{pith2026241200775,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Coherence of Symmetry-Protected Rotational Qubits in Cold Polyatomic Molecules},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ELAMZ4CL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.00775}
}
abstract

Polar polyatomic molecules provide an ideal but largely unexplored platform to encode qubits in rotational states. Here, we trap cold (100-600 mK) formaldehyde (H$_2$CO) inside an electric box and perform a Ramsey-type experiment to observe long-lived (~100 $\mu$s) coherences between symmetry-protected molecular states with opposite rotation but identical orientation, representing a quasi-hidden molecular degree of freedom. As a result, the observed qubit is insensitive to the magnitude of an external electric field, and depends only weakly on magnetic fields. Our findings provide a basis for future quantum and precision experiments with trapped cold molecules.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.00775 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a): Illustration of formaldehyde rotating in opposite [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Radio-frequency depletion of molecules. H [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Coherence between symmetry-protected states. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. A. Nielsen and I. L. Chuang, Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, 2010)

    2010

  2. [2]

    Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    J. Preskill, Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and be- yond, Quantum 2, 79 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    DeMille, Quantum Computation with Trapped Polar Molecules, Phys

    D. DeMille, Quantum Computation with Trapped Polar Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 067901 (2002)

    work page 2002

  4. [4]

    S. F. Yelin, K. Kirby, and R. Cot´ e, Schemes for robust quantum computation with polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A 74, 050301(R) (2006)

    work page 2006

  5. [5]

    P. Rabl, D. DeMille, J. M. Doyle, M. D. Lukin, R. J. Schoelkopf, and P. Zoller, Hybrid Quantum Processors: Molecular Ensembles as Quantum Memory for Solid State Circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 033003 (2006)

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    L. D. Carr, D. DeMille, R. V. Krems, and J. Ye, Cold and ultracold molecules: science, technology and applications, New J. Phys. 11, 055049 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Q. Wei, S. Kais, B. Friedrich, and D. Herschbach, Entan- glement of polar symmetric top molecules as candidate qubits, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 154102 (2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    K.-K. Ni, T. Rosenband, and D. D. Grimes, Dipolar ex- change quantum logic gate with polar molecules, Chem. Sci. 9, 6830 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    P. Yu, L. W. Cheuk, I. Kozyryev, and J. M. Doyle, A scalable quantum computing platform using symmetric- top molecules, New J. Phys. 21, 093049 (2019). [S3] A. Prehn, M. Ibr¨ ugger, R. Gl¨ ockner, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, Optoelectrical Cooling of Polar Molecules to Submil...

    2019

  2. [11]

    Anderegg, B

    L. Anderegg, B. L. Augenbraun, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, L. W. Cheuk, W. Ketterle, and J. M. Doyle, Laser cooling of optically trapped molecules, Nat. Phys. 14, 890 (2018)

    2018

  3. [12]

    Caldwell, J

    L. Caldwell, J. A. Devlin, H. J. Williams, N. J. Fitch, E. A. Hinds, B. E. Sauer, and M. R. Tarbutt, Deep Laser Cooling and Efficient Magnetic Compression of Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 033202 (2019)

    2019

  4. [13]

    S. Ding, Y. Wu, I. A. Finneran, J. J. Burau, and J. Ye, Sub-Doppler Cooling and Compressed Trapping of YO Molecules at µK Temperatures, Phys. Rev. X 10, 021049 (2020)

    2020

  5. [14]

    T. K. Langin, V. Jorapur, Y. Zhu, Q. Wang, and D. De- Mille, Polarization enhanced deep optical dipole trapping of Λ-cooled Polar Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 163201 (2021)

    2021

  6. [15]

    Schindewolf, R

    A. Schindewolf, R. Bause, X.-Y. Chen, M. Duda, T. Kar- man, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Evaporation of microwave- shielded polar molecules to quantum degeneracy, Nature 607, 677 (2022)

    2022

  7. [16]

    S. V. Syzranov, M. L. Wall, B. Zhu, V. Gurarie, and A. M. Rey, Emergent Weyl excitations in systems of polar particles, Nat. Commun. 7, 13543 (2016)

    2016

  8. [17]

    J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Cold molecules: Progress in quantum engineering of chemistry and quan- tum matter, Science 357, 1002 (2017)

    2017

  9. [18]

    N. Y. Yao, M. P. Zaletel, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and A. Vishwanath, A quantum dipolar spin liquid, Nature Phys 14, 405 (2018)

    2018

  10. [19]

    J. A. Blackmore, L. Caldwell, P. D. Gregory, E. M. Bridge, R. Sawant, J. Aldegunde, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. M. Huston, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cor- nish, Ultracold molecules for quantum simulation: rota- tional coherences in CaF and RbCs, Quantum Sci. Tech- n...

    2019

  11. [20]

    J. W. Park, Z. Z. Yan, H. Loh, S. A. Will, and M. W. Zwierlein, Second-scale nuclear spin coherence time of ul- tracold 23Na40K molecules, Science 357, 372 (2017)

    2017

  12. [21]

    V. V. Albert, J. P. Covey, and J. Preskill, Robust En- coding of a Qubit in a Molecule, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031050 (2020)

    2020

  13. [22]

    Hughes, M

    M. Hughes, M. D. Frye, R. Sawant, G. Bhole, J. A. Jones, S. L. Cornish, M. R. Tarbutt, J. M. Hutson, D. Jaksch, and J. Mur-Petit, Robust entangling gate for polar molecules using magnetic and microwave fields, Phys. Rev. A 101, 062308 (2020)

    2020

  14. [23]

    Sawant, J

    R. Sawant, J. A. Blackmore, P. D. Gregory, J. Mur-Petit, D. Jaksch, J. Aldegunde, J. M. Hutson, M. R. Tarbutt, and S. L. Cornish, Ultracold polar molecules as qudits, New J. Phys. 22, 013027 (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    P. D. Gregory, J. A. Blackmore, S. L. Bromley, J. M. Hut- son, and S. L. Cornish, Robust storage qubits in ultracold polar molecules, Nature Phys 17, 1149 (2021)

    2021

  16. [25]

    T. V. Tscherbul, J. Ye, and A. M. Rey, Robust Nu- clear Spin Entanglement via Dipolar Interactions in Polar Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 143002 (2023)

    2023

  17. [26]

    ACME Collaboration, Improved limit on the electric dipole moment of the electron, Nature 562, 355 (2018)

    2018

  18. [27]

    Prehn, M

    A. Prehn, M. Ibr¨ ugger, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, High-Resolution “Magic”-Field Spectroscopy on Trapped Polyatomic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 173602 (2021)

    2021

  19. [28]

    Grasdijk, O

    O. Grasdijk, O. Timgren, J. Kastelic, T. Wright, S. Lam- oreaux, D. DeMille, K. Wenz, M. Aitken, T. Zelevin- sky, T. Winick, and D. Kawall, CeNTREX: a new search for time-reversal symmetry violation in the 205Tl nucleus, Quantum Sci. Technol. 6, 044007 (2021)

    2021

  20. [29]

    Segev, M

    Y. Segev, M. Pitzer, M. Karpov, N. Akerman, J. Narevi- cius, and E. Narevicius, Collisions between cold molecules in a superconducting magnetic trap, Nature 572, 189 (2019)

    2019

  21. [30]

    Bause, A

    R. Bause, A. Schindewolf, R. Tao, M. Duda, X.-Y. Chen, G. Qu´ em´ ener, T. Karman, A. Christianen, I. Bloch, and X.-Y. Luo, Collisions of ultracold molecules in bright and dark optical dipole traps, Physical Rev. Res. 3, 033013 (2021)

    2021

  22. [31]

    Koller, F

    M. Koller, F. Jung, J. Phrompao, M. Zeppenfeld, I. Rabey, and G. Rempe, Electric-Field-Controlled Cold Dipolar Collisions between Trapped CH 3F Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 203401 (2022)

    2022

  23. [32]

    G. Tang, M. Besemer, S. Kuijpers, G. C. Groenenboom, 6 A. van der Avoird, T. Karman, and S. Y. T. van de Meerakker, Quantum state–resolved molecular dipolar col- lisions over four decades of energy, Science 379, 1031 (2023)

    2023

  24. [33]

    T. P. Softley, Cold and ultracold molecules in the twen- ties, Proc. R. Soc. A 479, 20220806 (2023)

    2023

  25. [34]

    Anderegg, L

    L. Anderegg, L. W. Cheuk, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, An optical tweezer array of ultracold molecules, Science 365, 1156 (2019)

    2019

  26. [35]

    L. W. Cheuk, L. Anderegg, Y. Bao, S. Burchesky, S. S. Yu, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Observation of Collisions between Two Ultracold Ground-State CaF Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 043401 (2020)

    2020

  27. [36]

    A. M. Kaufman and K.-K. Ni, Quantum science with optical tweezer arrays of ultracold atoms and molecules, Nat. Phys. 17, 1324 (2021)

    2021

  28. [37]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand en- tanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  29. [38]

    D. K. Ruttley, A. Guttridge, S. Spence, R. C. Bird, C. R. L. Sueur, J. M. Hutson, and S. L. Cornish, Forma- tion of Ultracold Molecules by Merging Optical Tweezers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 223401 (2023)

    2023

  30. [39]

    A. J. Park, L. R. Picard, G. E. Patenotte, J. T. Zhang, T. Rosenband, and K.-K. Ni, Extended rotational coher- ence of polar molecules in an elliptically polarized trap, Physical Review Letters 131, 183401 (2023)

    2023

  31. [40]

    Y. Bao, S. S. Yu, L. Anderegg, E. Chae, W. Ketterle, K.-K. Ni, and J. M. Doyle, Dipolar spin-exchange and en- tanglement between molecules in an optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1138 (2023)

    2023

  32. [41]

    Zeppenfeld, A robust framework for quantum com- putation using quasi-hidden molecular degrees of freedom, arXiv:2311.14133

    M. Zeppenfeld, A robust framework for quantum com- putation using quasi-hidden molecular degrees of freedom, arXiv:2311.14133. [S2] B. G. U. Englert, M. Mielenz, C. Sommer, J. Bayerl, M. Motsch, P. Pinkse, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, Storage and Adiabatic Cooling of Polar Mol...

    2011 arXiv

  33. [43]

    Gl¨ ockner, A

    R. Gl¨ ockner, A. Prehn, B. G. U. Englert, G. Rempe, and M. Zeppenfeld, Rotational Cooling of Trapped Polyatomic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 233001 (2015). [S4] M. Ibr¨ ugger, State selective fluorescence detection of cold formaldehyde , Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universit...

    2015

  34. [45]

    See supplemental material for details about the bright and dark superposition states, our experimental setup and experimental parameters

  35. [46]

    M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997)

    1997

  36. [47]

    H¨ uttner, M

    W. H¨ uttner, M. Lo, and W. H. Flygare, Molecular g- Value Tensor, the Molecular Susceptibility Tensor, and the Sign of the Electric Dipole Moment in Formaldehyde, J. Chem. Phys. 48, 1206 (1968)

    1968

  37. [48]

    M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  38. [49]

    N. R. Hutzler, Polyatomic molecules as quantum sensors for fundamental physics, Quantum Sci. Technol.5, 044011 (2020)

    2020

  39. [50]

    B. L. Augenbraun, Z. D. Lasner, A. Frenett, H. Sawaoka, A. T. Le, J. M. Doyle, and T. C. Steimle, Observa- tion and laser spectroscopy of Ytterbium Monomethoxide, YbOCH3, Phys. Rev. A 103, 022814 (2021)

    2021

  40. [51]

    Yu and N

    P. Yu and N. R. Hutzler, Probing fundamental symme- tries of deformed nuclei in symmetric top molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 023003 (2021)

    2021

  41. [52]

    Anderegg, N

    L. Anderegg, N. B. Vilas, C. Hallas, P. Robichaud, A. Jadbabaie, J. M. Doyle, and N. R. Hutzler, Quan- tum control of trapped polyatomic molecules for eEDM searches, Science 382, 665 (2023). 7 SUPPLEMENT AL MA TERIAL Composition of bright and dark state In a three-level system...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.