Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 44 references

Two-Measure Electroweak Standard Model. Some aspects of cosmological evolution and vacuum stability

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that the evolving ratio of two volume-measure densities turns every electroweak coupling into a classical running parameter, connecting CMB-consistent Higgs inflation at small non-minimal coupling to the standard Higgs…

desk verdict New TMT machinery, but the two headline predictions are consistency matches, not derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15623 v3 pith:ELRCBUIP submitted 2025-01-26 hep-th

Alexander B. Kaganovich This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th PACS 12.15.-y98.80.Cq04.50.Kd
keywords two-measuretheoryHiggsinflationelectroweaksymmetrybreakingclassicalrunningcouplingsfermionmasshierarchycosmologicalbackgroundvacuumstabilityone-loopeffectivepotential
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single classical mechanism, the ratio $\zeta$ of two volume measures in the Two-Measure theory, produces both the inflationary early universe and the low-energy electroweak Standard Model. As the cosmologically averaged Higgs field rolls from super-Planckian values to the vacuum, $\zeta$ moves from $\approx 0$ to $\approx 1$, and every coupling becomes a classical running parameter. This lets the same primordial self-coupling $\lambda\simeq 2.3\times 10^{-11}$, needed for CMB-consistent inflation with $\xi=1/6$, become $\lambda\simeq 0.1$ near the vacuum while the Higgs mass term flips sign and triggers spontaneous symmetry breaking. It also makes universal primordial Yukawa couplings produce the observed charged-lepton and up-quark mass hierarchy through near-unity volume-measure parameters. If correct, this would connect inflationary physics and electroweak physics without a huge non-minimal coupling and without fine-tuned Yukawa matrices.

What carries the argument

The central object is the scalar ratio $\zeta = \Upsilon/\sqrt{-g}$ of the two volume-measure densities, one built from the standard volume element and one built from four auxiliary scalar fields. Through the TMT constraint, $\zeta$ is fixed as a function of the cosmologically averaged Higgs field, and because $\zeta$ enters every equation of motion, all coupling constants become classical TMT-effective running parameters. The paper's conceptual machinery is the split between a classical cosmological background, described by the set $\{\varphi(t), \text{curvature}, \zeta(\varphi)\}$, and the local quantized fields living on that background; each stage of evolution therefore realizes a different copy of the GWS model.

What would settle it

Feed the one-loop effective energy-momentum tensor back into the constraint defining $\zeta$: if $\zeta$ during slow-roll inflation moves away from the assumed value near zero, or if the one-loop shift of the plateau height exceeds the paper's $3\times 10^{-2}$ tolerance, then the up-copy and the small-$\xi$ inflation scenario collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the two-measure electroweak Standard Model contains the observed particle physics as one member of a family of cosmologically modified copies of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam theory. On the background approaching the vacuum, where $\zeta\to 1$, the model reduces to the tree-level GWS theory: $v\approx 246$ GeV, $m_h\approx 125$ GeV, standard $W$ and $Z$ masses, and the standard Higgs mechanism triggered by a sign flip of the TMT-effective mass term. On the slow-roll inflationary background, where $\zeta\approx 0$, the paper constructs an up-copy with up-VEV $\sqrt{6}M_P$, an up-Higgs of mass about $2.9\times 10^{13}$ GeV, and up-gauge bosons around $10^{15}$ to $10^{16}$ GeV; there the background curvature supplies the negative mass-squared term. The link between the two copies is the near-unity parameter $b_k-1\approx 1.6\times 10^{-5}$, which simultaneously makes $\lambda\approx 2.3\times 10^{-11}$ consistent with Planck CMB data at $\xi=1/6$ and produces $\lambda_{\rm SM}\approx 0.1$ near the vacuum. Universal primordial Yukawa couplings, about $10^{-6}$ for charged leptons and $10^{-5}$ for up-quarks, then reproduce the observed fermion mass hierarchy through near-unity $b_i$ parameters. One-loop corrections computed with the effective potential of the Standard Model in curved spacetime leave the up-vacuum stable and the slow-roll plateau intact, because the small primordial gauge couplings make radiative corrections to $\lambda_{\rm eff}$ only of order $10^{-13}$.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the cosmologically averaged Higgs field is a purely classical background, while the local Standard Model fields on that background are quantized and do not react back on it; if that back-reaction is sizable, the split into cosmological copies and the inflation calculation would have to be redone.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • All electroweak couplings become classical running parameters because $\zeta(\varphi)$ enters every equation of motion, so no renormalization-group running is needed to connect inflationary and electroweak energy scales.
  • The same primordial $\lambda\approx 2.3\times 10^{-11}$ fits Planck CMB data at $\xi=1/6$ and yields $\lambda_{\rm SM}\approx 0.1$ near the vacuum, removing the need for the huge non-minimal couplings of conventional Higgs inflation.
  • The sign flip of the TMT-effective Higgs mass term provides a dynamical origin for spontaneous symmetry breaking rather than putting the negative mass-squared by hand.
  • Universal primordial Yukawa couplings, fixed at about $10^{-6}$ for charged leptons and $10^{-5}$ for up-quarks, together with near-unity $b_i$ parameters, reproduce the observed fermion mass hierarchy and the small electron-neutrino mass.
  • One-loop corrections in the up-copy leave the up-vacuum stable and do not destroy slow-roll inflation, because the tiny primordial gauge couplings suppress radiative corrections to the quartic Higgs self-coupling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If correct, the model implies the Standard Model is not a fixed theory but the near-vacuum member of a family of epoch-dependent electroweak theories, suggesting that early-universe particle physics had very different gauge charges and masses with potentially observable cosmological relics.
  • The same near-unity $b_i$ mechanism should apply to down-quarks and to neutrino mixing; computing those sectors would test whether the fermion hierarchy is fully explained or only the up-type and charged-lepton sectors.
  • The paper leaves the post-inflationary stage to future work; the monotonic $\zeta(\varphi)$ evolution assumed in the intermediate regime is unproven once $\dot\varphi^2$ feeds the constraint, so a numerical solution of the cosmological equations would either extend or delimit the scenario.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Two-Measure Theory (TMT) extension of the electroweak Standard Model, in which the ratio ζ of the two volume measures appears in all equations of motion and becomes a function of the cosmologically averaged Higgs field ϕ(t). Each stage of cosmological evolution is claimed to support a separate 'cosmologically modified copy' of the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam theory: near the vacuum the TMT action reduces to the GWS theory, whereas during slow-roll inflation it yields an 'up-copy' with Planck-scale VEV and large masses for the Higgs and gauge bosons. The advertised results are: the classical TMT-effective Higgs self-coupling grows from λ≈10^{-11} at inflation to λ≈0.1 near the vacuum; the Higgs mass term changes sign so that spontaneous symmetry breaking is standard; gauge and Yukawa couplings run by orders of magnitude; the fermion mass hierarchy is obtained 'quite naturally' from universal primordial Yukawa couplings; and one-loop corrections preserve slow-roll inflation and vacuum stability. The paper also estimates the one-loop effective potential in the up-copy and reconstructs a quantum effective primordial TMT action.

Significance. If the central claims were established, the paper would offer a novel unification of Higgs inflation and electroweak symmetry breaking without the large non-minimal coupling ξ∼10^4–10^8 of conventional Higgs inflation, and it would propose a mechanism for fermion mass hierarchies. The algebraic structure is worked out in considerable detail, and the up-copy predictions — for example m̃h≈2.9·10^13 GeV and M̃_W≈7.8·10^15 GeV in Section 7 — are concrete and falsifiable. However, as detailed in the major comments, the two headline quantitative results, λ≈0.1 near the vacuum and the 'natural' fermion hierarchy, are not predictions: they are obtained by fitting model parameters to known low-energy measurements. The one-loop analysis in Section 9 is a strength in that it is explicit, but it relies on a postulated classical/quantum split whose domain of validity is not established. The paper is therefore not suitable for publication in its current form.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6.1, Eqs. (6.3), (6.14), (6.15)] The advertised near-vacuum value λ≈0.1 is not an independent prediction. Equation (6.14) fixes bk−1 from the measured values of v≈246 GeV and m_h≈125 GeV, and then Eq. (6.3) reduces to λ_SM = (1+bp)m_h^2/(3v^2), which for the chosen bp≈1/2 is exactly the Standard Model identity λ_SM = m_h^2/(2v^2). Thus the 'increase from λ≈10^{-11} to λ≈0.1' is a consistency condition obtained by choosing bk, not a computed consequence of the TMT dynamics. The lower endpoint is also input: λ≈2.3·10^{-11} is selected in Section 2.2 to match Planck data at ξ=1/6. Both endpoints of the claimed classical running are therefore imposed rather than derived.
  2. [Section 6.2.3, Eqs. (6.31)–(6.38)] The fermion mass hierarchy is fitted, not explained. For each charged lepton there is an independent parameter b_l, and Eq. (6.31) with the values in Eq. (6.35) reproduces m_e, m_μ, and m_τ by construction; the up-quark sector is treated identically in Eqs. (6.33) and (6.38). The text states this directly: 'Tuning the fermion masses is carried out by choosing the appropriate values of the model parameters b_l, b_ν, b_q'. A universal primordial Yukawa coupling combined with a per-family b_i is a reparameterization of the usual per-family Yukawa couplings. No symmetry or mechanism is provided that would explain why the b_i−1 deviations take the fitted values, so the abstract's claim that the hierarchy is obtained 'quite naturally' is unsupported.
  3. [Sections 1, 4.1, 5.1 item 3, and Appendix B] The classical/quantum split is a postulate, not a justified approximation. The paper declares the cosmologically averaged Higgs field ϕ(t) to be classical and quantizes local fluctuations on the fixed background {ϕ(t), curvature, ζ(ϕ)}, explicitly excluding variation of the metric and the measure fields and neglecting back-reaction. This split is necessary for the existence of the 'cosmological copies' and for the one-loop calculation in Section 9 and the reconstruction in Appendix B. Since the background field is itself a Higgs condensate whose fluctuations are being quantized, the absence of any estimate of back-reaction or a validity criterion is a load-bearing gap: if local quantum fields react back on the background, the up-copy effective potential and the claimed preservation of slow-roll inflation require revision.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1] The abbreviation for the local particle physics frame appears as 'LPFF' in the Introduction and as 'LPPF' elsewhere; please use a single notation consistently.
  2. [Section 4.1] There are several typographical errors, including 'describtion' and 'magnitute'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption does not identify which curve is the classical TMT-effective potential and which is the doubly-effective potential; please label the curves directly or add a legend.
  4. [General] The paper relies heavily on the companion paper [19] for load-bearing results such as the plateau form of the TMT-effective potential and the derivation of the constraint. Since the present manuscript is not self-contained in these respects, please state explicitly which equations from [19] are assumed and which are re-derived here.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The abstract's two headline results—λ≈0.1 near vacuum and a 'natural' fermion mass hierarchy—are obtained by fitting b_k and b_i to known masses; they reduce to SM identities or to a relabeling of Yukawa couplings.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 6.1, eqs. (6.3), (6.10), (6.13), (6.14)-(6.15)]
    "combining equations (6.10) and (6.13), we obtain the relation (bk − 1)2 = 3λ v2/m2 h. Substituting the values of v ≈ 246 GeV and mh ≈ 125 GeV known from particle physics, and the value of λ ≈ 2.3 · 10−11 we get bk − 1 ≈ 1.6 · 10−5."

    The free parameter bk−1 is fixed by eq. (6.14) using the measured v and m_h. But eq. (6.3) defines λSM = (1+bp)/(bk−1)^2 λ, and eqs. (6.10) and (6.13) together imply λSM = m_h^2/(2v^2). Thus the advertised λ(near vac) ≈ 0.1 is exactly the Standard Model ratio of the input masses; it is not an independent TMT-derived value. The paper presents this consistency check as a result, but the 'prediction' of λ ~ 0.1 near vacuum is built in by the choice of bk−1.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 6.2.3, eqs. (6.31)-(6.33) and text following]
    "Tuning the fermion masses is carried out by choosing the appropriate values of the model parameters bl, bν, bq, which appear due to two volume measures in the primordial action - a fundamental feature of TMT. ... Substituting the values of the masses of charged leptons [25] and v ≈ 246 GeV into eqs.(6.31), we obtain the following values of the corresponding parameters be ≈ 1.003; bµ ≈ 1 + 10−5; bτ ≈ 1 + 8 · 10−7."

    Eqs. (6.31)-(6.33) give each fermion mass as an independent function of the per-family parameter b_l (or b_q), with one universal Yukawa y_ch (or y_up). The observed masses are then used to solve for b_e, b_μ, b_τ, b_u, b_c, b_t. Consequently the reproduced masses are the input masses by construction. The universal Yukawa plus per-family b_i is a relabeling of the usual per-family Yukawa couplings, and the smallness of (b_i − 1) merely restates the observed smallness of fermion masses relative to v. The claim that the hierarchy is obtained 'quite naturally' is therefore unsupported.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims of the abstract—that the Higgs self-coupling runs from λ ~ 10^{-11} at inflation to λ ~ 0.1 near vacuum, and that the fermion mass hierarchy is reproduced naturally—are not independent derivations. The value λ ~ 0.1 near vacuum is fixed by the measured v and m_h through the choice of bk−1 in eq. (6.14); algebraically it is identical to the SM relation λ = m_h^2/(2v^2). Likewise, the fermion masses are tuned by choosing per-family b_i parameters, as the paper explicitly states, so the hierarchy is an input rather than an output. The paper does contain substantial non-circular content: the cosmological-copy construction, the up-copy masses and couplings, and the one-loop vacuum stability calculation follow from the TMT ansatz and stated approximations, and they are not tautological consequences of the fitted b_i. The importation of λ ≈ 2.3·10^{-11} from the author's companion paper [19] is a self-citation, but since that value is anchored to Planck CMB data, it is not by itself circular. The circularity is concentrated in the two headline 'predictions' that are obtained by fitting parameters to the very data they claim to reproduce. Overall this is partial circularity, not a fully self-citation-forced derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 14 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on a large set of fitted or hand-chosen parameters: lambda from CMB, bk from v and mh, and a separate b_i for every fermion mass. The fermion 'hierarchy' is achieved by assigning one near-unity parameter per fermion, which does not reduce the number of free parameters compared with the usual Yukawa couplings. The genuinely new content is the two-copy cosmological framework and the one-loop stability analysis.

free parameters (14)
  • primordial Higgs self-coupling lambda = 2.3e-11
    Fixed by matching the TMT plateau height to Planck CMB normalization in companion paper [19].
  • non-minimal coupling xi = 1/6
    Chosen as the conformal value; inflation consistency relies on it together with the CMB-fitted lambda.
  • vacuum scale q = q^4 = 3e-10, |V1| = |V2| ~ (1e16 GeV)^4
    Chosen to set the inflationary plateau and to allow fine tuning of the cosmological constant via eq. (2.15).
  • bp = 0.5 (1 + 1e-8)
    Chosen so that the constraint zeta(phi) does not contradict the onset of inflation in [19].
  • bk = 1 + 1.6e-5
    Obtained in eq. (6.14) by inserting lambda, v = 246 GeV and mh = 125 GeV; this is a fit to known Higgs data.
  • primordial Higgs mass m = 0.7 GeV
    Derived from bk - 1 and mh via eq. (6.13); it is not independently measured.
  • charged-lepton universal Yukawa y(ch) = ~1e-6
    Chosen by hand; then each b_l is fitted to reproduce the corresponding lepton mass.
  • b_e, b_mu, b_tau = 1.003, 1 + 1e-5, 1 + 8e-7
    Fitted to electron, muon and tau masses in eq. (6.31).
  • b_nu = 1.01
    Fitted to an eV-scale neutrino mass with y_nu ~ 1e-11.
  • up-quark universal Yukawa y(up) = ~1e-5
    Chosen by hand; then each b_q is fitted to reproduce up quark masses.
  • b_u, b_c, b_t = 1.05, 1 + 9e-5, 1 + 6e-7
    Fitted to up, charm and top masses in eq. (6.33).
  • neutrino Yukawa y_nu = ~1e-11
    Chosen to produce a small Dirac neutrino mass; another hand-set parameter.
  • primordial gauge couplings g, g' = 2.6e-3, 1.4e-3
    Derived from bk - 1 and low-energy gauge couplings via eqs. (6.4) and (6.21), inheriting the fit to bk.
  • integration constant M = 2 q^4 MP^4 (1 + delta), |delta| << 1
    Fine-tuned in eq. (2.15) so that the cosmological constant is zero or below the electroweak scale.
assumptions (9)
  • standard math Two-measure theory with four auxiliary scalars phi_a and the constraint determining zeta is a valid starting point.
    This is the TMT framework developed in prior work; the paper uses it without deriving it from a more fundamental principle.
  • standard math Palatini variation and the Weyl transformation to the Einstein frame produce the physical equations of the model.
    Used throughout Section 2; this is a standard variational procedure for TMT and Palatini gravity.
  • domain assumption Cosmological averaging of the local Higgs field yields a classical homogeneous background field phi(t).
    Introduced in Sections 1 and 4.1; the paper treats phi(t) as classical and excludes it from SM quantization.
  • domain assumption Quantized SM fields do not back-react on the classical cosmological background.
    Stated in Section 5.1, item 3; the whole LPPF quantization scheme depends on this no-back-reaction approximation.
  • ad hoc to paper The integration constant M is fine-tuned so the vacuum energy is near zero.
    Eq. (2.15) and Appendix C; this is an imposed condition, not a derived outcome.
  • ad hoc to paper The special coefficient structure (b_i sqrt(-g) +- Upsilon) in the primordial action is chosen by hand.
    Sections 2.1 and 3; the signs and near-unity values of b_i are model inputs, not consequences of a symmetry.
  • domain assumption During slow-roll inflation zeta ~ 0 and kinetic terms in the constraint are negligible.
    Section 4.2 and Appendix A use the companion paper [19] for this; the paper acknowledges numerical work is needed in intermediate stages.
  • domain assumption The 1-loop effective potential for the Standard Model in curved spacetime from ref. [24] applies to the up-copy.
    Used in Section 9.2; the up-copy is treated as standard SM in de Sitter space with small couplings.
  • ad hoc to paper Fermion masses are generated by the same SSB mechanism as in the GWS theory after fixing b_i.
    Section 6.2.3; the b_i values are chosen to reproduce the known masses, so the mechanism is imposed rather than predictive.
invented entities (1)
  • Up-copy (Planck-scale SM copy during slow-roll inflation)
    purpose: Provides a local QFT copy of the electroweak SM on the inflationary background, with SSB at v ~ sqrt(6) MP and heavy W-like and Z-like bosons.
    Introduced in Section 7; its masses and couplings are derived from model parameters but no observable signature is predicted outside the inflation epoch.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two-Measure Electroweak Standard Model. Some aspects of cosmological evolution and vacuum stability." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ELRCBUIP

@misc{pith2026250115623,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two-Measure Electroweak Standard Model. Some aspects of cosmological evolution and vacuum stability},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ELRCBUIP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15623}
}
abstract

In the FLRW universe, the scalar field \phi(t) obtained by cosmological averaging of the local Higgs field H(x) is considered as a classical field for which the SM quantization procedure is meaningless. When applying the Two-Measure theory (TMT) to study cosmology, the ratio \zeta of the measure densities is a scalar function, which: enters into all equations of motion. Through the constraint, $\zeta$ is defined as a function of \phi(t). During cosmological evolution, \zeta(\phi) changes from \zeta\approx 0 at the inflationary stage to \zeta=1 at the approaching vacuum stage. Each stage of the classical cosmological background is determined by the set \{\phi(t), {\rm curvature}, \zeta(\phi(t))\}. The Two-Measure SM (TMSM) is realized in the context of cosmology as a set of cosmologically modified copies of the GWS model. Each of the copies exists as a local quantum field theory defined on the classical cosmological background at the appropriate stage of its evolution. This basic idea is studied in detail for the stage of slow-roll inflation and for the stage of approaching vacuum. Due to the presence of \zeta(\phi(t)) in all equations of motion, all TMSM coupling constants turn out to be running (classical) TMT-effective parameters. During cosmological evolution, changing these parameters yields new results: the classical running TMT-effective Higgs selfcoupling increases from \lambda\sim 10^{-11} (which ensures consistency with Planck's CMB data at \xi=\frac{1}{6}) to \lambda\sim 0.1 near vacuum; the mass term in the Higgs potential changes sign from positive to negative, providing standard SSB; the classical running gauge and Yukawa coupling constants change by several orders of magnitude; the GWS theory is reproduced so that the fermion mass hierarchy is obtained quite naturally. 1-loop quantum corrections preserves the slow-roll inflation and does not violate the vacuum stability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Kaganovich,Higgs inflation model with small non-minimal coupling constant [arXiv:2501.15597]

    Alexander B. Kaganovich,Higgs inflation model with small non-minimal coupling constant [arXiv:2501.15597]

    work page arXiv

  2. [1]

    Giudice, Filippo Sala, Alberto Salvio, Alessandro Strumia,Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [1307.3536 [hep-ph]]

    Dario Buttazzo, Giuseppe Degrassi, Pier Paolo Giardino, Gian F. Giudice, Filippo Sala, Alberto Salvio, Alessandro Strumia,Investigating the near-criticality of the Higgs boson JHEP 12 (2013) 089 [1307.3536 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2013

  3. [2]

    Bezrukov and M

    F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,The Standard Model Higgs boson as the inflaton, Phys.Lett. B659 (2008) 703 [arXiv:0710.3755]

    arXiv 2008

  4. [3]

    Bezrukov, A

    F.L. Bezrukov, A. Magnin and M. Shaposhnikov,Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation, Phys.Lett. B675 (2009) 88 [arXiv:0812.4950]

    arXiv 2009

  5. [4]

    Bezrukov and M

    F. Bezrukov and M. Shaposhnikov,Standard Model Higgs boson mass from inflation: Two loop analysis, JHEP0907 (2009) 089 [arXiv:0904.1537]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [5]

    Bezrukov, A

    F. Bezrukov, A. Magnin, M. Shaposhnikov, S. Sibiryakov,Higgs inflation: consistency and generalisations, JHEP 01 (2011) 016 [arXiv:1008.5157]

    arXiv 2011

  7. [6]

    Fedor Bezrukov, Javier Rubio), Mikhail Shaposhnikov,Living beyond the edge: Higgs inflation and vacuum metastability, Phys.Rev.D 92 (2015) 8, 083512 [1412.3811 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv 2015

  8. [7]

    Rubio,Higgs inflation, Front

    J. Rubio,Higgs inflation, Front. Astron. Space Sci.5 (2019) 50 [1807.02376]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 44 references
  1. [8]

    and Starobinsky, A.A.,Inflation scenario via the Standard Model Higgs boson and LHC, JCAP11 (2008) [arXiv:0809.2104]

    Barvinsky, A.O., Kamenshchik, A.Yu. and Starobinsky, A.A.,Inflation scenario via the Standard Model Higgs boson and LHC, JCAP11 (2008) [arXiv:0809.2104]

    2008 arXiv

  2. [9]

    and Steinwachs, C.F., Higgs boson, renormalization group, and naturalness in cosmology, Eur

    Barvinsky, A.O., Kamenshchik, A.Yu., Kiefer, C., Starobinsky, A.A. and Steinwachs, C.F., Higgs boson, renormalization group, and naturalness in cosmology, Eur. Phys. J.C 72 (2012) 2219 [arXiv:0910.1041]

    2012 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Barvinsky, Alexander Yu

    Andrei O. Barvinsky, Alexander Yu. Kamenshchik,Nonminimal Higgs Inflation and Initial Conditions in Cosmology[2212.13077 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  4. [11]

    Bauer and D

    F. Bauer and D. A. Demir,Inflation with non-minimal coupling: Metric versus Palatini formulations, Phys. Lett.B 665 (2008) 222 [0803.2664]

    2008 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Syksy Rasanen, Pyry Wahlman,Higgs inflation with loop corrections in the Palatini formulation, JCAP 11 (2017) 047 [1709.07853 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2017 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Palatini, JCAP03 (2018) 029 [1712.04874 [gr-qc]]

    Tommi Markkanen, Tommi Tenkanen, Ville Vaskonen, Hardi Veermäe,Quantum corrections to quartic inflation with a non-minimal coupling: metric vs. Palatini, JCAP03 (2018) 029 [1712.04874 [gr-qc]]

    2018 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Mikhail Shaposhnikov, Andrey Shkerin, Sebastian Zell,Quantum Effects in Palatini Higgs Inflation, JCAP 07 (2020) 064 [2002.07105 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  8. [16]

    52 (2020) 4, 33 [2001.10135 [astro-ph.CO]]

    Tommi Tenkanen,Tracing the high energy theory of gravity: an introduction to Palatini inflation Gen.Rel.Grav. 52 (2020) 4, 33 [2001.10135 [astro-ph.CO]]

    2020 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Vera-Maria Enckell, Sami Nurmi, Syksy Räsänen, Eemeli Tomberg,Critical point Higgs inflation in the Palatini formulation JHEP04 (2021) 059 [2012.03660 [astro-ph.CO]] – 54 –

    2021 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Gialamas, Alexandros Karam, Thomas D

    Ioannis D. Gialamas, Alexandros Karam, Thomas D. Pappas, Eemeli Tomberg,Implications of Palatini gravity for inflation and beyond, Int.J.Geom.Meth.Mod.Phys.20 (2023) 13 [2303.14148 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  11. [20]

    Armendariz-Picon, Viatcheslav F

    C. Armendariz-Picon, Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, Paul J. Steinhardt,A Dynamical solution to the problem of a small cosmological constant and late time cosmic acceleration, Phys.Rev.Lett. 85 (2000) 4438-4441 [arXiv:0004134 [astro-ph]]

    2000

  12. [21]

    Armendariz-Picon, Viatcheslav F

    C. Armendariz-Picon, Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, Paul J. Steinhardt,Essentials of k essence, Phys.Rev. D 63 (2001) 103510 [arXiv:0006373 [astro-ph]]

    2001

  13. [22]

    Erickson, R.R

    Joel K. Erickson, R.R. Caldwell, Paul J. Steinhardt), C. Armendariz-Picon, Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, Measuring the speed of sound of quintessence Phys.Rev.Lett88 (2002) 121301 [arXiv:0112438 [astro-ph]]

    2002

  14. [23]

    E. I. Guendelman and A. B. Kaganovich,Fine tuning free paradigm of Two Measures Theory: K-essence, absence of initial singularity of the curvature and inflation with graceful exit to zero cosmological constant state, Phys. Rev.D 75, 083505 (2007) [arXiv:0607111]

    2007

  15. [24]

    Tommi Markkanen, Sami Nurmi, Arttu Rajantie, Stephen Stopyra,The 1-loop effective potential for the Standard Model in curved spacetime JHEP06 (2018) 040 [1804.02020 [hep-ph]]

    2018 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Navas et al

    S. Navas et al. Particle Data Group,Review of particle physics Phys.Rev.D 110 (2024) 3, 030001

    2024

  17. [26]

    Kolb, Andrei D

    Edward W. Kolb, Andrei D. Linde, Antonio RiottoGUT baryogenesis after preheating Phys.Rev.Lett. 77 (1996) 4290-4293 [9606260 [hep-ph]]

    1996

  18. [27]

    Peskin, Daniel V

    Michael E. Peskin, Daniel V. SchroederAn Introduction to quantum field theory, Westview Press (1995)

    1995

  19. [28]

    D. J. Toms,Renormalization of Interacting Scalar Field Theories in Curved Space-time, Phys. Rev. D 26 (1982) 2713

    1982

  20. [29]

    D. J. Toms,The Effective Action and the Renormalization Group Equation in Curved Space-time, Phys. Lett.126 B (1983) 37

    1983

  21. [30]

    Buchbinder, S.D

    I.L. Buchbinder, S.D. Odintsov,One loop renormalization of the Yang-Mills theory in curved space-time, Sov.Phys.J.26 (1983) 359-361

    1983

  22. [31]

    B. L. Hu and D. J. O’Connor,Effective Lagrangian forλϕ4 theory in curved space-time with varying background fields: quasilocal approximation, Phys. Rev.D30 (1984) 743

    1984

  23. [32]

    I. L. Buchbinder and S. D. Odintsov,Effective potential and phase transitions induced by curvature in gauge theories in curved space-time, Yad. Fiz.42 (1985) 1268

    1985

  24. [33]

    S. D. Odintsov,Renormalization group, effective action and grand unification theories in curved space-time, Fortsch. Phys.39 (1991) 621

    1991

  25. [34]

    I. L. Buchbinder, S. D. Odintsov and I. L. Shapiro,Effective action in quantum gravity, IOP, Bristol (1992)

    1992

  26. [35]

    S. D. Odintsov,Two loop effective potential in quantum field theory in curved space-time, Phys. Lett. B 306 (1993) 233 [gr-qc/9302004]. – 55 –

    1993 arXiv

  27. [36]

    Elizalde and S

    E. Elizalde and S. D. Odintsov,Renormalization group improved effective potential for gauge theories in curved space-time, Phys. Lett.B 303 (1993) 240 [hep-th/9302074]

    1993 arXiv

  28. [37]

    Kirsten, G

    K. Kirsten, G. Cognola and L. Vanzo,Effective Lagrangian for selfinteracting scalar field theories in curved space-time, Phys. Rev.D 48 (1993) 2813 [hep-th/9304092]

    1993 arXiv

  29. [38]

    Elizalde and S

    E. Elizalde and S. D. Odintsov, Renormalization group improved effective Lagrangian for interacting theories in curved space-time, Phys. Lett. B321 (1994) 199 [hep-th/9311087]

    1994 arXiv

  30. [39]

    Elizalde and S

    E. Elizalde and S. D. Odintsov,Renormalization group improved effective potential for interacting theories with several mass scales in curved space-time, Z. Phys.C 64 (1994) 699 [hep-th/9401057]

    1994 arXiv

  31. [40]

    Elizalde and S

    E. Elizalde and S. D. Odintsov,Renormalization group improved effective potential for finite grand unified theories in curved space-time, Phys. Lett.B 333 (1994) 331 [hep-th/9403132]

    1994 arXiv

  32. [41]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    2009

  33. [42]

    Birrell, P.C.W

    N.D. Birrell, P.C.W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (1982)

    1982

  34. [43]

    Sfakianakis, Jorinde van de Vis,Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production Phys.Rev.D 99 (2019) 8, 083519 [1810.01304 [hep-ph]]

    Evangelos I. Sfakianakis, Jorinde van de Vis,Preheating after Higgs Inflation: Self-Resonance and Gauge boson production Phys.Rev.D 99 (2019) 8, 083519 [1810.01304 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Tomberg,Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation JCAP04 (2019) 021 [1902.10148 [hep-ph]]

    Javier Rubio, Eemeli S. Tomberg,Preheating in Palatini Higgs inflation JCAP04 (2019) 021 [1902.10148 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Eemeli Tomberg, Hardi Veermäe,Tachyonic preheating in plateau inflation JCAP12 (2021) 12, 035 [2108.10767 [astro-ph.CO]] – 56 –

    2021 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.