Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 35 references

Curvature and conformal curvature dynamics formalisms and their applications in linearized gravity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Curvature alone fixes weak-gravity energy and momentum

desk verdict Section 6 is the real content: a mostly correct equivalence between Bia\l{}ynicki-Birula-type curvature integrals and Landau-Lifshitz energy/momentum for TT-gauge plane-wave superpositions, with the stress-test factor-of-2 concern not surviving. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00515 v1 pith:EPPTZ2XH submitted 2025-02-01 gr-qc

Adam Chudecki , Maciej Przanowski This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc PACS 04.20.Cv04.30.-w
keywords tensorialformalismspinorialhelicitycurvaturedynamicslinearizedgravitygravitationalradiationenergyandmomentumelectricmagneticpartsoftheWeyltensor
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper recasts the equations of gravitational dynamics in terms of curvature itself: the Bianchi identities become field equations for the Riemann and Weyl tensors, written in tensorial, spinorial, and Plebański's helicity formalisms. Its central result is an equivalence for linearized vacuum radiation: the Białynicki-Birula double-integral energy, built only from the electric and magnetic parts of the free gravitational field, coincides with the Landau–Lifshitz energy once the coefficient is fixed to $\alpha=c^{4}/(64\pi^{2}G)$. The same construction yields a momentum integral that matches the Landau–Lifshitz momentum for $\alpha'=c^{3}/(32\pi^{2}G)$. The consequence is that the energy and momentum of weak gravitational radiation admit a curvature-only expression that agrees with the standard pseudotensor result.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the curvature-dynamics reformulation: the Bianchi identities, written as field equations for the Weyl tensor, are converted into evolution equations for the electric and magnetic parts $E_{ab}=C_{0a0b}$ and $B_{ab}=i\,{}^*C_{0a0b}$ of the free gravitational field. In vacuum these fields obey the transverse equations $\partial_l E^{il}=0$, $\partial_l B^{il}=0$ and the d'Alembert equations $\square E_{il}=0$, $\square B_{il}=0$, so they can be expanded in plane waves. The helicity formalism of Plebański supplies the soldering between spinors and $\mathrm{SO}(3,\mathbb{C})$ tensors in which $E_{ab}$ and $B_{ab}$ arise as the real and imaginary parts of the Weyl spinor's helicity image. The decisive step is the Fourier-space comparison of the double integral with the Landau–Lifshitz pseudotensor energy and momentum in the TT gauge, which fixes the two coefficients $\alpha$ and $\alpha'$.

What would settle it

Compute both sides of Eq. (6.18) for a smooth, localized wave packet that solves the vacuum linearized equations, keeping the space-divergence term dropped in (6.15); if the term contributes or the two integrals differ, the claimed coefficient $\alpha=c^{4}/(64\pi^{2}G)$ is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the Białynicki-Birula formula for gravitational energy, $$E=\$\alpha$\iint\frac{E_{il}(\mathbf{r})$E^{{il}}$(\mathbf{r}')+B_{il}(\mathbf{r})$B^{{il}}$(\mathbf{r}')}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\,$d^{{3}}$r\,$d^{{3}}$r',$$ equals the Landau–Lifshitz energy $E^{(LL)}$ of linearized vacuum radiation when $\alpha=c^{4}/(64\pi^{2}G)$, and that the proposed momentum integral $$$P^{{i}}$=\$\alpha$'\iint\frac{P_{ilm}\,$E^{{l}}${}_{n}(\mathbf{r})$B^{{mn}}$(\mathbf{r}')}{|\mathbf{r}-\mathbf{r}'|}\,$d^{{3}}$r'\,$d^{{3}}$r$$ equals the Landau–Lifshitz momentum when $\alpha'=c^{3}/(32\pi^{2}G)$. The proof uses plane-wave expansions of $E_{il}$ and $B_{il}$, the TT-gauge relations (6.11)–(6.12) linking them to the metric perturbation, and a Fourier-space comparison with the Landau–Lifshitz expressions. The paper also states that the Einstein pseudotensor gives the same energy, so the curvature-based formula is not an isolated coincidence but a gauge-invariant form of the standard pseudotensor result.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the radiative fields can be treated as plane-wave superpositions for which the double integrals converge and the space-divergence terms dropped from the Landau–Lifshitz energy and momentum vanish, a condition exact plane waves — with their infinite energy — do not satisfy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In linearized vacuum, gravitational energy can be written purely as a double integral of the electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor, with no metric perturbation appearing in the integrand.
  • With the fixed coefficient, the Białynicki-Birula energy equals the Landau–Lifshitz energy, and the companion momentum integral equals the Landau–Lifshitz momentum; the Einstein pseudotensor gives the same energy.
  • The curvature-based energy is time-independent for the plane-wave radiative solutions considered.
  • The radiated power derived in the curvature language reduces to the standard quadrupole formula $L=G/(45c^{5})\,\dddot{D}_{il}\dddot{D}^{il}$.
  • The linearized field equations take a gravito-electromagnetic form, with evolution and constraint equations for $E_{il}$ and $B_{il}$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a properly regularized version of the Białynicki-Birula integral could serve as a gauge-invariant definition of weak-field gravitational energy, avoiding pseudotensors entirely — a step toward quantizing linearized gravity in curvature variables.
  • Beyond the paper: the same coefficient-matching strategy could fix analogous double integrals for angular momentum or helicity by Fourier-comparing them with the corresponding pseudotensor expressions.
  • Beyond the paper: because the proof is carried out in TT gauge with plane-wave expansions, a natural test is to repeat the comparison in a nontransverse gauge or for compactly supported initial data where the dropped surface terms are nonnegligible.
  • Beyond the paper: the helicity-formalism equations suggest a gravitational analogue of the Riemann–Silberstein vector; the paper provides the ingredients but does not itself construct the nonlinear version.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper develops curvature and conformal-curvature dynamics in tensorial, spinorial, and Plebański helicity formalisms, specializing them to linearized gravity. It uses the electric and magnetic parts of the Weyl tensor to describe weak gravitational radiation, recovers the standard quadrupole power formula in Eq. (5.41), and then addresses a Białynicki-Birula-type nonlocal energy expressed through the electric and magnetic parts. The central claim of Section 6 is that, with coefficient α = c^4/(64π^2G), the B-B-type energy equals the Landau-Lifshitz energy for linearized vacuum radiation, and with α' = c^3/(32π^2G) a proposed momentum integral equals the Landau-Lifshitz momentum.

Significance. If the Section 6 equivalence holds for a well-defined class of radiative data, the paper provides a purely curvature-based expression for the energy and momentum of weak gravitational waves, which is a useful complement to the Białynicki-Birula program and to pseudotensor methods. The derivation is explicit and the recovery of the standard quadrupole luminosity in Eq. (5.41) is a valuable internal consistency check. The main result is, however, conditional: the comparison in Section 6 is performed for formal plane-wave superpositions without a specified regularization, and the coefficients α and α' are fixed by requiring agreement with the Landau-Lifshitz results, so the nontrivial content is the matching of spectral densities rather than an independent prediction of the normalization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.5)-(6.6), (6.9), (6.15), (6.21)] The proof of E = E^(LL) and P^i = P^(LL)_i is carried out for plane-wave superpositions whose total energy is infinite, while the double integral in (6.2) and the volume integrals in (6.16) and (6.20) are defined only for normalizable data. The space-divergence terms dropped from (6.15) and (6.21) are asserted to vanish without specifying the falloff of h^{TT} or a limiting procedure. As it stands, the equivalence is demonstrated only at the level of formal Fourier manipulations, not for a well-defined class of radiative solutions; the authors should specify a regularization (for example, wave packets or an infinite-volume limit with controlled surface terms) or prove that the surface terms vanish for the admitted data.
  2. [Section 6, Eq. (6.24)] The factor-of-2 inconsistency claimed in the stress-test does not land as stated. In the manuscript as printed, the first line of (6.24) has coefficient πα', and using h^+(k) = conj(h^-(k)) from (6.10) makes the bracket equal to 2|h^-|^2, giving exactly 2πα' in the second line; equating this with the Landau-Lifshitz result (6.22) yields α' = c^3/(32π^2G), as claimed. If the authors intended a different coefficient in the first line, they should clarify, but the printed comparison is internally consistent.
  3. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.1)-(6.2), (6.18)] The proved statement concerns a modified Białynicki-Birula formula with α = c^4/(64π^2G), whereas the B-B formula quoted in (6.1) has the coefficient c^4/(32π^2G). The abstract's unqualified wording that the Białynicki-Birula formula is equivalent to the Landau-Lifshitz formula is therefore stronger than what is actually shown; the qualification already present in the text should be reflected in the abstract and in the introduction.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] The equivalence statement should say 'a modified Białynicki-Birula formula with coefficient c^4/(64π^2G)' rather than 'the Białynicki-Birula formula', since Eq. (6.1) carries the coefficient c^4/(32π^2G).
  2. [Section 2, Eqs. (2.48) and (2.53)] The transitions described as 'straightforward calculations' and 'long and tedious manipulations' are not shown; since these equations are central to the curvature-dynamics formalism, an appendix with the key intermediate steps or a more detailed reference would improve verifiability.
  3. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.18) and (6.25)] The coefficients α and α' are fixed by requiring equality with the Landau-Lifshitz results; this is a matching condition rather than an independent derivation of the normalization. The wording should make this explicit, even though the spectral-density match is genuine.
  4. [Various] There are several typographical errors that should be corrected: 'quadruple' should be 'quadrupole' in Eq. (5.21), 'Cronecker' should be 'Kronecker' in Eq. (2.53), and 'd'Alambert' should be 'd'Alembert' in Eq. (4.8).

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: Section 6 fixes alpha by direct comparison with the independently computed Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor integral; the derivation is self-contained.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. In Section 6, the Bialynicki-Birula-type double integral (6.2) is evaluated on plane-wave superpositions to give (6.8), then reduced to the metric amplitude h^TT via the linearized relations (6.11)-(6.12), yielding (6.14). Independently, the Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor (5.36) is evaluated in the TT gauge, a space-divergence term is dropped, and the Fourier expansion gives (6.17). Equating the two independent expressions fixes the single free coefficient alpha in (6.18). This is an explicit algebraic comparison, not an assumption of the target equality; the nontrivial content is that both sides reduce to the same |h^-|^2 integral. The momentum argument is structurally identical, with alpha' fixed by matching (6.22) and (6.24). Self-citations ([9], [23], [29]) support standard identities or background analogies and are not load-bearing. The proof is conditional on dropping surface terms and on regularizing infinite plane-wave superpositions, but those are stated technical restrictions on the class of data, not circular inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on two adjustable coefficients alpha and alpha' fixed by comparison with LL, so they are listed as free parameters. The background uses standard GR equations, spinor-calculus identities from an unpublished source, and a linearized TT-gauge plane-wave assumption. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • alpha (coefficient in B-B energy formula) = c^4/(64 pi^2 G)
    Introduced in Eq. (6.2) as an undetermined factor; fixed in Eq. (6.18) by requiring equality with the Landau-Lifshitz energy for plane-wave superpositions. This is a consistency condition, not a fit to data.
  • alpha' (coefficient in momentum formula) = c^3/(32 pi^2 G)
    Introduced in Eq. (6.19) and fixed in Eq. (6.25) by requiring equality with the Landau-Lifshitz momentum.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Einstein field equations (2.12) and contracted Bianchi identities (2.15) are assumed as the dynamical basis.
    Used throughout Section 2 to derive curvature and Weyl dynamics equations.
  • standard math Two-spinor calculus identities (2.45), (2.47), (2.58), (3.64) are taken from Plebanski's unpublished monograph [12] without proof.
    These identities are needed to pass from tensorial equations (2.24) and (2.52) to spinorial equations (2.48)-(2.53).
  • domain assumption Linearization g = eta + h with |h| << 1 and TT gauge (5.22) are valid for weak radiation.
    Section 4 and Section 5 rely on these hypotheses; curvature variables become gauge invariant only in linearized theory.
  • domain assumption Landau-Lifshitz pseudotensor (5.36), not a tensorial quantity, is accepted as the energy-momentum measure in linearized gravity.
    Section 6 compares B-B formula against LL pseudotensor; equality is gauge-dependent by construction.
  • ad hoc to paper Plane-wave superpositions (6.5)-(6.6), (6.9) are normalizable and space-divergence terms in (6.15), (6.21) integrate to zero.
    This is an unproved technical assumption; exact plane waves have infinite energy and require regularization or wave-packet interpretation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvature and conformal curvature dynamics formalisms and their applications in linearized gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EPPTZ2XH

@misc{pith2026250200515,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvature and conformal curvature dynamics formalisms and their applications in linearized gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EPPTZ2XH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00515}
}
read the original abstract

Tensorial, spinorial and helicity formalisms of the curvature and conformal curvature dynamics are developed. Equations of linearized gravity within that formalisms are given. Gravitational radiation in linearized gravity in terms of curvature dynamics is investigated. Equivalence of the Bia\l{}ynicki-Birula formula for the gravitational energy in linearized gravity and the Landau-Lifschitz formula is proved. Analogous result is found for the momentum in linearized gravity.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. W. van Holten, Curvature dynamics in general relativity, Unive rse, 9 (2023) 110; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9020110

    work page doi:10.3390/universe9020110 2023

  2. [2]

    Quantum fluctuations of geometry in hot Universe

    I. Bia/suppress lynicki-Birula, Quantum fluctuations of geometry in hot Universe, Class. Quan- tum Grav. 32 (2015) 215015; arXiv: 1501.07405v3[gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    Pleba´ nski, The spinorial and helicity formalisms of Riemannian s tructures in complex or real four dimensions, preprint of CINVESTAV, Mexico, 1 980

    J.F. Pleba´ nski, The spinorial and helicity formalisms of Riemannian s tructures in complex or real four dimensions, preprint of CINVESTAV, Mexico, 1 980

    work page

  4. [4]

    Landau, E.M

    L.D. Landau, E.M. Lifschitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 4th ed n, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, 1975

    work page 1975

  5. [5]

    Misner, K.S

    C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne, J.A. Wheeler, Gravitation, Freeman, San Francisco, 1973

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    Ferrari, L

    V. Ferrari, L. Gualtieri, P.Pani, General Relativity and its Applications, Black Holes, Compact Stars and Gravitational Waves, CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, LLC, 2020

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    Kundt, M

    W. Kundt, M. Tr¨ umper, Contributions to the theory of gravita tional radiation fields, in Proceedings of the Class of Mathematics and the Natural S ciences Vol- ume, Academy of Sciences and Literature in Mainz in Commission at Fra nz Steiner Verlag GMBH, Wiesbaden, 1962

    work page 1962

  8. [8]

    Szekeres, On the propagation of gravitational fields in matte r, J

    P. Szekeres, On the propagation of gravitational fields in matte r, J. Math. Phys. 7 (1966) 751; http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1704989

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1704989 1966

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Przanowski, J.F

    M. Przanowski, J.F. Pleba´ nski, Generalized Goldberg-Sachs the orems in complex and real space-times (II), Acta Phys. Polon. B10 (1979) 573

    1979

  2. [10]

    Corson, Introduction to Tensors, Spinors and Relativistic Wave Equations, Blackie & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1954

    E.M. Corson, Introduction to Tensors, Spinors and Relativistic Wave Equations, Blackie & Son, Ltd., London and Glasgow, 1954

    1954

  3. [11]

    Pirani, Introduction to gravitational radiation theory, in Lectures in General Relativity Theory, Brandeis Summer Institute, Prentice-Hall, Inc.,Englewood Cliffs., 1964

    F.A.E. Pirani, Introduction to gravitational radiation theory, in Lectures in General Relativity Theory, Brandeis Summer Institute, Prentice-Hall, Inc.,Englewood Cliffs., 1964

    1964

  4. [12]

    Pleba´ nski, Spinors, Tetrads and Forms, unpublished monography, CINVESTAV, M´ exico, 1974

    J.F. Pleba´ nski, Spinors, Tetrads and Forms, unpublished monography, CINVESTAV, M´ exico, 1974

    1974

  5. [13]

    Penrose, W

    R. Penrose, W. Rindler, Spinors and Space-Time, Vol. I: Two-Sp inors Calculus and Relativistic Fields, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984

    1984

  6. [14]

    Matte, Sur de nouvelles solutions oscillatoires des equations d e la gravitation, Can

    A. Matte, Sur de nouvelles solutions oscillatoires des equations d e la gravitation, Can. J. Math. 5 (1953) 1; https://doi.org/10.4153/CJM-1953-00 1-3

    1953 doi

  7. [15]

    Bel, Sur la radiation gravitationelle, C.R

    L. Bel, Sur la radiation gravitationelle, C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris. 247 ( 1958) 1094

    1958

  8. [16]

    Bel, Introduction d’un tenseur du guatri` eme ordre, Comptes Rendus 248 (1959) 1297

    L. Bel, Introduction d’un tenseur du guatri` eme ordre, Comptes Rendus 248 (1959) 1297

    1959

  9. [17]

    Penrose, A spinor approach to general relativity, Ann

    R. Penrose, A spinor approach to general relativity, Ann. Phy s. (NY). 10 (1960) 171 28

    1960

  10. [18]

    Tr¨ umper, A threedimensional formulation of the Bianchi ide ntities for vacuum gravitational fields, Gen

    M. Tr¨ umper, A threedimensional formulation of the Bianchi ide ntities for vacuum gravitational fields, Gen. Rel. Grav. 53 (2021) 110; https://doi.or g/10.1007/s10714- 021-02861-9. [Republication of: M. Tr¨ umper, A threedimensionalformulation of the Bianchi identities for vac...

    2021 doi

  11. [19]

    Ellis, Relativistic Cosmology, in Carg` ese Lectures in Physics, vol.VI, ed

    G.F.R. Ellis, Relativistic Cosmology, in Carg` ese Lectures in Physics, vol.VI, ed. E. Schatzman, Gordon and Breach, 1973

    1973

  12. [20]

    Ellis and P.A

    G.F.R. Ellis and P.A. Hogan, The electromagnetic analogue of some g ravitational perturbations in cosmology, Gen. Rel. Grav. 29 (1997) 235

    1997

  13. [21]

    Maartens, B.A

    R. Maartens, B.A. Bassett, Gravito-electromagnetism, Class . Quantum Grav. 15 (1998) 705, arXiv: gr-qc/9704059v.3

    1998 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Barnett, Maxwellian theory of gravitational waves and the ir mechanical prop- erties, New J

    S.M. Barnett, Maxwellian theory of gravitational waves and the ir mechanical prop- erties, New J. Phys. 16 (2014) 023027, DOI 10.1088/1367-2630/ 16/2/023027

    2014 doi

  15. [23]

    Przanowski, M

    M. Przanowski, M. Dobrski, J. Tosiek. F.J. Turrubiates, Linear graviton as a quantum particle, Class. Quantum Grav. 41 (2024) 095006, DOI 10 .1088/1361- 6382/ad31d2, arXiv: 2310.09429v1[gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Silberstein, Elektromagnetische Grundgleichungen in bivecto rieller Behandlung, Ann

    L. Silberstein, Elektromagnetische Grundgleichungen in bivecto rieller Behandlung, Ann. Phys. 22 (1907) 579

    1907

  17. [25]

    Silberstein, Nachtrag zur Abhandlung ¨ uber ”Elektromagnetische Grundgleichun- gen in bivectorieller Behandlung”, Ann

    L. Silberstein, Nachtrag zur Abhandlung ¨ uber ”Elektromagnetische Grundgleichun- gen in bivectorieller Behandlung”, Ann. Phys. 24 (1907) 783

    1907

  18. [26]

    Weber, Die partiellen Differential-Gleichungen der mathematisc hen Physik: nach Riemann’s Vorlesungen, Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, 1901

    H. Weber, Die partiellen Differential-Gleichungen der mathematisc hen Physik: nach Riemann’s Vorlesungen, Friedrich Vieweg und Sohn, Braunschweig, 1901

    1901

  19. [27]

    Bia/suppress lynicki-Birula, Z

    I. Bia/suppress lynicki-Birula, Z. Bia/suppress lynicka-Birula, Quantum Electrodynamics, Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975

    1975

  20. [28]

    Bia/suppress lynicki-Birula, Z

    I. Bia/suppress lynicki-Birula, Z. Bia/suppress lynicka-Birula, The role of the Riemann-Silberstein vector in classical and quantum theories of electromagnetism, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46 (2013) 159501, arXiv:1211.2655v2 [physics.class-ph]

    2013 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Przanowski, J

    M. Przanowski, J. Tosiek, F.J. Turrubiates, The Weyl-Wigner-M oyal formalism on a discrete phase space. II. The photon Wigner function, Fortsch ritte der Physik, 69 (2020) 2000061 https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.202000061

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    Bonnor, Multipole fields in linearized general relativity, in Pers pectives in Geometry and Relativity, Essays in Honor of V´ aclav Hlavat´ y, Banesh Hoffman ed

    W.B. Bonnor, Multipole fields in linearized general relativity, in Pers pectives in Geometry and Relativity, Essays in Honor of V´ aclav Hlavat´ y, Banesh Hoffman ed. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and London, 1966, pp 28-37

    1966

  23. [31]

    Zakharov, Gravitational Waves in Einstein’s Theory, Halsted Press, New York, 1973

    V.D. Zakharov, Gravitational Waves in Einstein’s Theory, Halsted Press, New York, 1973

    1973

  24. [32]

    Smo/suppress lka, J

    T. Smo/suppress lka, J. Jezierski, Simple description of generalized electromagnetic and grav- itational hopfions, Class. Quantum Grav. 35 (2018) 245010, DOI 1 0.1088/1361- 6382/aaeb51, arXiv: 1802.01467v1 [gr-qc] 29

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Jezierski, J

    J. Jezierski, J. Kijowski, The localization of energy in gauge field t heories and in linear gravitation, Gen. Rel. Grav. 22 (1990) 1283

    1990

  26. [34]

    Dirac, General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1975

    P.A.M. Dirac, General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley & Sons, New York, London, Sydney, Toronto, 1975

    1975

  27. [35]

    Petrov, S.M

    A.N. Petrov, S.M. Kopeikin, R.R. Lompay, B. Tekin, Metric Theorie s of Gravity: Perturbations and Conservation Laws, vol. 38, Walter le Gruyter G mbH & Co KG, Berlin, 2017 30

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.