Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 75 references

Superconformal indices and black hole saddles

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read At sufficiently large ${\rm Im}\,\tau$ the superconformal index is dominated by the thermal AdS saddle, so all black hole saddles with exponentially large $N$ contributions cannot contribute.

desk verdict A careful, honest paper that resolves the tension on the CFT side with a clean analytic bound, but whose advertised bulk mechanism rests on an unproven ansatz and a hand-imposed truncation, both acknowledged. read the letter →

arxiv 2608.07660 v1 pith:EQ6BYQVO submitted 2026-08-07 hep-th

Maciej Kolanowski , Donald Marolf , Zi-Yue Wang , Wenwen Zheng This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords superconformalindexAdS/CFTcorrespondenceblackholesaddlesPicard-LefschetztheoryStokesphenomenaN=4supersymmetricYang-MillsABJMLorentzianpathintegral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper resolves a tension inside AdS/CFT. The superconformal index of ${\mathcal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory is known from its matrix-integral definition to tend rapidly to 1 when the fugacity $\tau$ has a large imaginary part, for any rank $N$; yet earlier bulk analyses had proposed a black hole saddle whose contribution grows exponentially with $N$ in exactly that regime. The authors argue that the bulk gravitational path integral should be defined through a Lorentzian-motivated ansatz that sums over real stationary black holes with codimension-2 conical defects, and that fermion zero modes further restrict the relevant configurations to the BPS locus. Using Picard-Lefschetz thimble analysis on the resulting one-dimensional integral, they show that the previously proposed exponential saddle contributes only inside a bounded region of the $\tau$-plane and is turned off by a Stokes phenomenon at sufficiently large ${\rm Im}\,\tau$. The same analysis for the AdS$_4$/ABJM index produces the same conclusion: in the large-${\rm Im}\,\tau$ regime the only remaining saddle is thermal AdS, so the index is of order one, consistent with the CFT side. If correct, this establishes which bulk saddles actually appear in these index computations and explains why the earlier exponentially large contributions are absent.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Lorentzian-motivated ansatz (1.5), an integral over the area $A$, angular momenta $J_1,J_2$, and R-charges $Q_1,Q_2,Q_3$ of real stationary Lorentz-signature black holes with codimension-2 singularities, weighted by $e^{A/4G_5} e^{-\beta(E-\Omega_1J_1-\Omega_2J_2 - \frac12\sum_i \Phi_i Q_i)}$ times shift phases. Fermion zero modes are argued to reduce this, in the $\beta\to\infty$ limit, to the BPS-only ansatz (3.1), which inserts a delta-function $\delta(E-2J-\frac32 Q)$ and integrates over the one-dimensional locus of real extremal BPS black holes. In the equal-charge, equal-angular-momentum case for AdS$_5$ the BPS locus is parametrized by $a\in[0,1)$, mapped to $t\in[1,2+\sqrt3)$; the reduced integral is one-dimensional with an action $\tilde S_{\rm BPS}(t;\tau)$ whose saddles include $t_\pm$, the thermal-AdS endpoint $t=1$, and $\tau$-independent points $t=\pm i$ and $t=(4+3i)/5$. Its contribution structure is decided by Picard-Lefschetz thimbles—the upward-flow cycles from each saddle and their intersection with the real contour—and by Stokes phenomena, where an ascent thimble jumps discontinuously when it encounters another saddle that contributes to the integral. The catalog of which saddles catalyze which transitions is what turns the black hole contribution on and off as $\tau$ varies.

What would settle it

Compute the ${\mathcal N}=4$ SU($N$) matrix integral (or its Bethe-ansatz form) at large $N$ for a value of $\tau$ outside the predicted Stokes region, e.g. $\tau=0.3+0.4i$, and look for a term proportional to $\exp(-N^2 i\pi(2\tau-1)^3/(27\tau^2))$ with a non-vanishing coefficient; if such a term survives, the claimed Stokes removal is wrong. A complementary check is to perform the gravitational path integral with an independent contour prescription and test whether the black hole saddle's Lefschetz thimble intersects the integration contour at that $\tau$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that at large ${\rm Im}\,\tau = {\rm Im}\,\sigma$ the superconformal index rapidly approaches 1 at all values of $N$, so no black hole saddle with a contribution exponentially large in $N$ can contribute to it. For the equal-charge truncation of the AdS$_5$ computation, the paper shows that the saddle with action $\exp(-N^2 i\pi(2\tau-1)^3/(27\tau^2))$—the 'unshifted' black hole saddle—is relevant only for a limited range of $\tau$, and that above a finite ${\rm Im}\,\tau$ a Stokes transition catalyzed by the thermal AdS endpoint removes it from the semiclassical expansion. The same mechanism applies to the shifted sectors and to orbifold/quotient saddles, and the AdS$_4$ equal-charge analysis of the ABJM index yields an analogous phase diagram in which a truly-BPS black hole saddle contributes only inside $|\tau|<1$. In both cases the infinite sums over shifted sectors collapse: at most one black hole saddle contributes for AdS$_5$, at most two for AdS$_4$, and at sufficiently large ${\rm Im}\,\tau$ only the thermal AdS endpoint remains. The authors further propose that saddles which are only asymptotically BPS must be dropped from the sum, and verify the consistency condition that those dropped saddles never catalyze Stokes transitions for the truly BPS ones.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion depends on the assumption that the bulk gravitational path integral is correctly captured by the Lorentzian-motivated ansatz—an integral over real stationary black holes with codimension-2 singularities—together with the hand-imposed restriction of the sum over saddles to those that are truly BPS; if the correct contour prescription or the truncation differs, the large-${\rm Im}\,\tau$ dominance of thermal AdS need not follow for the actual index.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the large-${\rm Im}\,\tau$ regime the index is of order $N^0$; the thermal AdS endpoint is the only contributing bulk saddle, so the previously proposed exponentially large black hole contribution is absent there.
  • At any fixed $\tau$ at most one AdS$_5$ shifted-sector black hole saddle, and at most two in AdS$_4$, can contribute; the infinite sums over shifts and over orbifold sectors reduce to order-one thermal-AdS coefficients plus finitely many saddles.
  • Supersymmetric orbifold saddles inherit the Stokes structure of their covering black hole with the $\tau$-region scaled by $1/m$, so at sufficiently large ${\rm Im}\,\tau$ they too disappear from the index.
  • The AdS$_5$ matrix-integral asymptotics, ${\mathcal I}(\tau)=1+O(e^{-8\pi\,{\rm Im}\,\tau/3})$ at fixed $N$, are the CFT-side fingerprint of the bulk conclusion; the paper predicts no exponentially-in-$N$ correction to this behavior.
  • The consistency condition that only-asymptotically-BPS saddles never catalyze Stokes transitions for truly-BPS saddles is satisfied by both systems, supporting the proposal to truncate the saddle sum to truly-BPS saddles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Lorentzian ansatz is the right definition of the gravitational path integral, the same Stokes phenomenon should select saddles in other supersymmetric index computations, including refined indices with unequal fugacities, because the mechanism is the structure of thimbles rather than the equal-charge simplification.
  • A sharp, testable prediction the paper does not spell out is that the turn-on of the exponentially large saddles is a non-analyticity in $\tau$ located on the predicted Stokes curves of the phase diagram; evaluating the large-$N$ matrix integral near those curves on the CFT side could directly confirm or refute the bulk picture.
  • For correlation functions whose inserted operators soak up fermion zero modes, the finite-$\beta$ analysis in appendix B shows that only-asymptotically-BPS saddles can catalyze Stokes transitions for truly-BPS saddles, so the main-text truncation recipe should not be applied to such supersymmetry-breaking insertions.
  • A general selection rule suggested by the paper's logic is that a complex saddle contributes to a supersymmetric index only if it is the large-$\beta$ limit of a finite-$\beta$ saddle that remains BPS; applying this rule would remove many candidate saddles in other gravitational index computations before any contour analysis.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the large-Im tau behavior of the superconformal index of N=4 SU(N) SYM and its ABJM analogue, arguing that the bulk gravitational path integral, when defined through a Lorentzian-motivated ansatz, receives only thermal AdS contributions at sufficiently large Im tau. The authors reduce the bulk problem to a one-dimensional BPS integral, perform a Picard-Lefschetz analysis of its saddles, and show that the exponentially large black hole saddle (1.4) is removed by a Stokes phenomenon. They also present a CFT-side derivation showing I approaches 1 at fixed N for large Im tau.

Significance. The paper contains several strong technical components: a clean analytic derivation of the CFT index asymptotics in Appendix A (Eq. (A.8)), an explicit reduction to a one-dimensional BPS integral in Section 5, and careful numerical Picard-Lefschetz flow computations in Figures 3-5 and Appendix C.2 that substantiate the Stokes analysis. If the bulk ansatz and truncation were derived from first principles, the conclusion that previously proposed black hole saddles are absent at large Im tau would be an important resolution of a known tension. The authors are transparent about the conditional status of these ingredients, which is a credit to the manuscript.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1, Eq. (1.5)] The central bulk claim is conditional on the Lorentzian-motivated ansatz (1.5), and the text explicitly states that the required derivation exists only for Maxwell charges and for angular momentum in 2+1 dimensions, while for AdS5 rotation the formula is taken 'as motivation.' The Picard-Lefschetz analysis in Section 5 computes saddle relevance for this specific reduced integral, so if the correct gravitational contour or measure differs from (1.5), the Stokes removal of the t+ saddle at large Im tau is not established for the actual index. The CFT bound in Appendix A is independent and robust, but the advertised bulk mechanism needs either a derivation of (1.5) for rotating AdS5 or a controlled test in a setting where the Lorentzian path integral can be computed independently.
  2. [Section 3.2 and Section 7] The truncation of the saddle sum to 'truly-BPS' saddles is a conjecture; the paper checks only a weaker consistency condition, and the only-asymptotically-BPS saddle at t=(4+3i)/5 is found to contribute in the red subregion of Figure 6 and is then removed by hand. Since this saddle is the large-beta limit of a non-BPS saddle with a fermion zero mode, its removal is plausible, but the weaker condition does not prove that the truncated sum is the semiclassical expansion of an integral representing the true index. Without a derivation from fermionic localization, the conclusion that only thermal AdS survives at large Im tau does not follow for the full index.
  3. [Section 4 and Section 7] The analysis is restricted to tau=sigma, equal charges, equal angular momenta, and SO(6)-homogeneous internal spaces, and D3/M5-brane effects are not included. The abstract's statement that black hole saddles 'cannot contribute' is broader than what is demonstrated; the demonstrated statement concerns the restricted BPS ansatz. This is an acknowledged limitation, but it is load-bearing for the claimed exclusion of previously suggested saddles, so the scope of the central claim should be narrowed or the missing effects must be addressed.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, first sentence] 'In section 3 we will find values...' should refer to Section 5 (or Section 4.2), since the relevant only-asymptotically-BPS saddle is analyzed there.
  2. [Figure 6 caption] The color labels 'lavender' and 'red' do not clearly correspond to the printed shading; please add a legend or hatching labels for accessibility.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'Stoke's transitions' in Section 5.1 and inconsistent use of 'ReSE = 0' in Section 5.3 where the BPS action is intended; please proofread.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Stokes-based exclusion of the (1.4) saddle is an independent parameter-free computation from black-hole thermodynamics; the Lorentzian ansatz and BPS truncation are openly stated assumptions, not repackaged inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central bulk claim (only thermal AdS at large Im tau, with the exponentially large saddle (1.4) removed by a Stokes transition) is obtained by a Picard-Lefschetz analysis of the reduced BPS-only integral (5.9)-(5.13). The action entering that integral, (5.15), is computed directly from the AdS5 black-hole thermodynamics of section 4, not imposed by the CFT. The CFT bound I = 1 + O(e^{-8 pi Im tau / 3}) in Appendix A is derived independently from the SU(N) matrix integral via the Weingarten formula and is not used to select or fit the bulk saddle. The Lorentzian-motivated ansatz (1.5) is admittedly not derived for higher-dimensional rotation: the paper states 'a corresponding derivation is not yet available for angular momentum in higher dimensions' and 'we will simply take the above as motivation to write the corresponding formulae.' Likewise, the truncation to truly-BPS saddles in section 3.2 is presented as a conjecture ('we conjecture this truncated sum to give a good semiclassical expansion'), and section 7 explicitly calls the resulting prescription Occam's-razor-based. These are transparent assumptions and limitations, not input-output tautologies. The self-citations to [18] and [34] provide context for the ansatz, but the load-bearing Stokes computation is self-contained in the present paper and reproduces the (1.4) action independently. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work is invoked to forbid alternatives.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result rests on an unproven prescription for the gravitational path integral, on a fermionic localization conjecture, and on a truncation of saddles; no numbers are fitted to data, and no new fundamental entities are introduced.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The Lorentzian path integral with codimension-2 singularities equals the saddle-sum ansatz (1.5).
    Invoked in section 1 to write (1.5); the paper states the derivation for rotating higher-dimensional black holes is not yet available.
  • domain assumption Fermion zero modes localize the index onto the BPS surface E-tilde = 0, giving the BPS-only ansatz (3.1).
    Argued in section 3 by analogy with supersymmetric localization; not derived.
  • domain assumption Saddles with unequal charges or unequal angular momenta can be neglected when the potentials are equal.
    Assumed in sections 4 and 7; only the equal-charge truncation is studied.
  • ad hoc to paper The infinite sums over shifted sectors converge with order-one one-loop coefficients.
    Assumed in sections 5.2 and 6 so that thermal AdS contributes at order N^0.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncating the saddle sum to truly-BPS saddles gives the correct semiclassical index.
    Proposed in section 3.2 and defended by the weaker consistency condition; stated as a conjecture in section 7.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Superconformal indices and black hole saddles." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EQ6BYQVO

@misc{pith2026260807660,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Superconformal indices and black hole saddles},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EQ6BYQVO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.07660}
}
abstract

The AdS/CFT correspondence implies that the superconformal index ${\mathcal I}$ in ${\mathcal N=4}$ SU(N) supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory can be computed using the dual bulk theory. In particular, in the limit of large $N$, the index should be given by a sum over appropriate saddles. However, ${\mathcal I}$ depends on potentials $\sigma, \tau, \vec \Delta$ and, at large ${\rm Im}\, \tau = {\rm Im}\, \sigma$, the CFT index ${\mathcal I}$ rapidly approaches $1$ at all values of $N$. As a result, black hole saddles associated with exponentially large contributions in $N$ cannot contribute in this limit. This in particular excludes saddles that were previously suggested to be relevant in such regimes. We thus consider an approach to the bulk path integral motivated by taking it to be defined as an integral over real Lorentz-signature spacetimes with codimension-2 singularities. This approach leads only to saddles that satisfy the above bound, and to the enforcement of this bound via Stokes phenomena. We also find similar results for bulk AdS$_4$ calculations of the ABJM superconformal index.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Copetti, A

    C. Copetti, A. Grassi, Z. Komargodski and L. Tizzano,Delayed deconfinement and the Hawking-Page transition,JHEP04(2022) 132, [2008.04950]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [1]

    Romelsberger,Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl

    C. Romelsberger,Counting chiral primaries in N = 1, d=4 superconformal field theories, Nucl. Phys. B747(2006) 329–353, [hep-th/0510060]

    arXiv 2006

  3. [2]

    Kinney, J

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209–254, [hep-th/0510251]

    arXiv 2007

  4. [3]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim and J. Nahmgoong,Large AdS black holes from QFT,1810.12067

    arXiv

  5. [4]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS5 black holes,JHEP10(2019) 062, [1810.11442]

    arXiv 2019

  6. [5]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan,Black Holes in 4DN=4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory,Phys. Rev. X10(2020) 021037, [1812.09613]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Aharony, F

    O. Aharony, F. Benini, O. Mamroud and E. Milan,A gravity interpretation for the Bethe Ansatz expansion of theN= 4SYM index,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 086026, [2104.13932]

    arXiv 2021

  8. [8]

    Closset, H

    C. Closset, H. Kim and B. Willett,N= 1 supersymmetric indices and the four-dimensional A-model,JHEP08(2017) 090, [1707.05774]

    arXiv 2017

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan,A Bethe Ansatz type formula for the superconformal index, Commun. Math. Phys.376(2020) 1413–1440, [1811.04107]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, G. Kwon, E. Lee et al.,Supersymmetric grey galaxies, dual dressed black holes and the superconformal index,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 072, [2501.17217]

    2025

  3. [11]

    Bhattacharya, S

    J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla and S. Raju,Indices for Superconformal Field Theories in 3,5 and 6 Dimensions,JHEP02(2008) 064, [0801.1435]

    2008 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bhattacharya and S

    J. Bhattacharya and S. Minwalla,Superconformal Indices for N = 6 Chern Simons Theories, JHEP01(2009) 014, [0806.3251]

    2009 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Aharony, O

    O. Aharony, O. Bergman, D. L. Jafferis and J. Maldacena,N=6 superconformal Chern-Simons-matter theories, M2-branes and their gravity duals,JHEP10(2008) 091, [0806.1218]

    2008 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Cabo-Bizet and S

    A. Cabo-Bizet and S. Murthy,Supersymmetric phases of 4dN= 4 SYM at largeN,JHEP 09(2020) 184, [1909.09597]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Aharony, J

    O. Aharony, J. Marsano, S. Minwalla, K. Papadodimas and M. Van Raamsdonk,The deconfinement and Hagedorn phase transitions in weakly coupled large N gauge theories, Comptes Rendus Physique5(2004) 945–954

    2004

  8. [16]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim and J. Nahmgoong,Comments on deconfinement in AdS/CFT, 1811.08646. – 62 –

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Lorentzian Path Integrals and Jackiw-Teitelboim wormholes with imaginary scalars,2601.09932

  10. [18]

    Kolanowski and D

    M. Kolanowski and D. Marolf,How to tame your (black hole) saddles: Lessons from the Lorentzian Gravitational Path Integral,2603.24681

    arXiv

  11. [19]

    G. W. Gibbons, S. W. Hawking and M. J. Perry,Path Integrals and the Indefiniteness of the Gravitational Action,Nucl. Phys. B138(1978) 141–150

    1978

  12. [20]

    G. T. Horowitz, D. Marolf and J. E. Santos,Constraints are not enough,JHEP10(2025) 031, [2505.13600]

    2025 arXiv

  13. [21]

    J. B. Hartle and K. Schleich,The Conformal Rotation in Linearised Gravity, inQuantum Field Theory and Quantum Statistics(C. J. I. I. A. Batalin and G. A. Vilkovisky, eds.), pp. 67–87, 4, 1987.2004.06635

    1987

  14. [22]

    Schleich,Conformal Rotation in Perturbative Gravity,Phys

    K. Schleich,Conformal Rotation in Perturbative Gravity,Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 2342–2363

    1987

  15. [23]

    P. O. Mazur and E. Mottola,The Gravitational Measure, Solution of the Conformal Factor Problem and Stability of the Ground State of Quantum Gravity,Nucl. Phys. B341(1990) 187–212

    1990

  16. [24]

    S. B. Giddings,The Conformal Factor and the Cosmological Constant,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 5(1990) 3811–3830

    1990

  17. [25]

    S. B. Giddings,Wormholes, the conformal factor, and the cosmological constant, in International Colloquium on Modern Quantum Field Theory, 5, 1990

    1990

  18. [26]

    Marolf,Path integrals and instantons in quantum gravity: Minisuperspace models,Phys

    D. Marolf,Path integrals and instantons in quantum gravity: Minisuperspace models,Phys. Rev. D53(1996) 6979–6990, [gr-qc/9602019]

    1996 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Gratton and N

    S. Gratton and N. Turok,Cosmological perturbations from the no boundary Euclidean path integral,Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 123507, [astro-ph/9902265]

    1999 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Dasgupta and R

    A. Dasgupta and R. Loll,A Proper time cure for the conformal sickness in quantum gravity, Nucl. Phys. B606(2001) 357–379, [hep-th/0103186]

    2001 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Ambjorn, A

    J. Ambjorn, A. Dasgupta, J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll,A Lorentzian cure for Euclidean troubles,Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.106(2002) 977–979, [hep-th/0201104]

    2002 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,Lorentzian Quantum Cosmology,Phys. Rev. D 95(2017) 103508, [1703.02076]

    2017 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,No smooth beginning for spacetime,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 171301, [1705.00192]

    2017 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Feldbrugge, J.-L

    J. Feldbrugge, J.-L. Lehners and N. Turok,No rescue for the no boundary proposal: Pointers to the future of quantum cosmology,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 023509, [1708.05104]

    2018 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Brown, A

    J. Brown, A. Cole, G. Shiu and W. Cottrell,Gravitational decoupling and the Picard-Lefschetz approach,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 025002, [1710.04737]

    2018 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Marolf,Gravitational thermodynamics without the conformal factor problem: partition functions and Euclidean saddles from Lorentzian path integrals,JHEP07(2022) 108, [2203.07421]

    D. Marolf,Gravitational thermodynamics without the conformal factor problem: partition functions and Euclidean saddles from Lorentzian path integrals,JHEP07(2022) 108, [2203.07421]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    X. Dong, A. Lewkowycz and M. Rangamani,Deriving covariant holographic entanglement, JHEP11(2016) 028, [1607.07506]. – 63 –

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Colin-Ellerin, X

    S. Colin-Ellerin, X. Dong, D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and Z. Wang,Real-time gravitational replicas: Formalism and a variational principle,JHEP05(2021) 117, [2012.00828]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Observations of Hawking radiation: the Page curve and baby universes,JHEP04(2021) 272, [2010.06602]

    2021 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Colin-Ellerin, X

    S. Colin-Ellerin, X. Dong, D. Marolf, M. Rangamani and Z. Wang,Real-time gravitational replicas: low dimensional examples,JHEP08(2021) 171, [2105.07002]

    2021 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Louko and R

    J. Louko and R. D. Sorkin,Complex actions in two-dimensional topology change,Class. Quant. Grav.14(1997) 179–204, [gr-qc/9511023]

    1997 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dong and D

    X. Dong and D. Marolf,One-loop universality of holographic codes,JHEP03(2020) 191, [1910.06329]

    2020 arXiv

  33. [41]

    H. Z. Chen,Thermodynamic stability from Lorentzian path integrals and codimension-two singularities,JHEP05(2025) 180, [2501.08409]

    2025 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Mahajan and K

    R. Mahajan and K. Singhi,A brief note on complex AdS-Schwarzschild black holes,JHEP11 (2025) 164, [2509.08883]

    2025 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Singhi,Complex Kerr-AdS Black Holes,2510.01313

    K. Singhi,Complex Kerr-AdS Black Holes,2510.01313

  36. [44]

    Ailiga, S

    M. Ailiga, S. Mallik and G. Narain,Complex saddles of charged-AdS gravitational partition function,JHEP02(2026) 054, [2510.25396]

    2026

  37. [45]

    J. L. F. Barbón and E. Velasco-Aja,AdS Black Holes Are Short-Lived inside the Spectral Form Factor,2607.21704

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Boruch, M

    J. Boruch, M. T. Heydeman, L. V. Iliesiu and G. J. Turiaci,BPS and near-BPS black holes in AdS5 and their spectrum inN= 4 SYM,JHEP07(2025) 220, [2203.01331]

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    L. V. Iliesiu, M. Kologlu and G. J. Turiaci,Supersymmetric indices factorize,JHEP05 (2023) 032, [2107.09062]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    M. V. Fedorjuk,The asymptotics of the fourier transform of the exponential function of a polynomial,Soviet Math. Doklady17(1976) 486–490

    1976

  41. [49]

    Pham,Vanishing homologies and thenvariable saddlepoint method,Proc

    F. Pham,Vanishing homologies and thenvariable saddlepoint method,Proc. Symp. Pure Math.2(1983)

    1983

  42. [50]

    V. I. Arnold, S. M. Gusein-Zade and A. N. Varchenko,Singularities Of Differentiable Maps, Vol. 2. Birkhauser, 1988

    1988

  43. [51]

    M. V. Berry and C. J. Howls,Hyperasymptotics,Proc. R. Soc.A430(1990) 653–668

    1990

  44. [52]

    M. V. Berry and C. J. Howls,Hyperasymptotics for integrals with saddles,Proc. R. Soc. A434(1991) 657–675

    1991

  45. [53]

    C. J. Howls,Hyperasymptotics for multidimensional integrals, exact remainder terms and the global connection problem,Proc. R. Soc. London453(1997) 2271

    1997

  46. [54]

    Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,AMS/IP Stud

    E. Witten,Analytic Continuation Of Chern-Simons Theory,AMS/IP Stud. Adv. Math.50 (2011) 347–446, [1001.2933]

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Axion Wormholes and the AdS/CFT Factorization Problem,2601.02507

  48. [56]

    Blau,The Mathai-Quillen formalism and topological field theory,J

    M. Blau,The Mathai-Quillen formalism and topological field theory,J. Geom. Phys.11 (1993) 95–127, [hep-th/9203026]. – 64 –

    1993 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Witten,Supersymmetry and Morse theory,J

    E. Witten,Supersymmetry and Morse theory,J. Diff. Geom.17(1982) 661–692

    1982

  50. [58]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu and C. N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 161301, [hep-th/0506029]

    2005 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. J. Duff, P. Hoxha, J. T. Liu, H. Lu, J. X. Lu et al.,Embedding AdS black holes in ten-dimensions and eleven-dimensions,Nucl. Phys. B558(1999) 96–126, [hep-th/9903214]

    1999 arXiv

  52. [60]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, E. Lee, S. Minwalla et al.,Dual dressed black holes as the end point of the charged superradiant instability inN= 4Yang Mills,SciPost Phys.18 (2025) 137, [2409.18178]

    2025 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Suh,A gravity interpretation for the complex Euclidean saddles of the ABJM index, 2605.00987

    M. Suh,A gravity interpretation for the complex Euclidean saddles of the ABJM index, 2605.00987

    arXiv

  54. [62]

    Benetti Genolini, A

    P. Benetti Genolini, A. Cabo-Bizet and S. Murthy,Supersymmetric phases of AdS4/CFT3, JHEP06(2023) 125, [2301.00763]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    M. M. Caldarelli, G. Cognola and D. Klemm,Thermodynamics of Kerr-Newman-AdS black holes and conformal field theories,Class. Quant. Grav.17(2000) 399–420, [hep-th/9908022]

    2000 arXiv

  56. [64]

    S. Choi, S. Jeong, S. Kim and E. Lee,Exact QFT duals of AdS black holes,JHEP09(2023) 138, [2111.10720]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Cabo-Bizet,From multi-gravitons to Black holes: The role of complex saddles, 2012.04815

    A. Cabo-Bizet,From multi-gravitons to Black holes: The role of complex saddles, 2012.04815

    2012 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Bajaj, V

    K. Bajaj, V. Kumar, S. Minwalla, J. Mukherjee and A. Rahaman,Grey Galaxies inAdS5, 2412.06904

    arXiv

  59. [67]

    Larsen and K

    F. Larsen and K. Sharma,Complex BPS Black Holes in AdS3 ×S 3,2605.28737

    arXiv

  60. [68]

    K. K. Nanda, P. Shanmugapriya and A. Virmani,Index saddle for the D1-D5-P black string and its decoupling limit,2606.27093

    arXiv

  61. [69]

    Boruch, L

    J. Boruch, L. V. Iliesiu, S. Murthy and G. J. Turiaci,New forms of attraction: attractor saddles for the black hole index,JHEP04(2025) 087, [2310.07763]

    2025 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Boruch, R

    J. Boruch, R. Emparan, L. V. Iliesiu and S. Murthy,Novel black saddles for 5d gravitational indices and the index enigma,2510.23699

  63. [71]

    Chen and G

    Y. Chen and G. J. Turiaci,Spin-statistics for black hole microstates,JHEP04(2024) 135, [2309.03478]

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Grabovsky and M

    D. Grabovsky and M. Kolanowski,Spin-refined partition functions andCRTblack holes, JHEP12(2024) 013, [2406.07609]

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Goker, L

    J. Goker, L. V. Iliesiu and E. Tabor,A note on the quantization of angular momentum for black holes,2606.13774

  66. [74]

    Chang and X

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin,1/16 BPS states inN=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D 88(2013) 106005, [1305.6314]

    2013 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Lectures at the summer school: String theory, field theory, and holography

    C.-M. Chang, “Lectures at the summer school: String theory, field theory, and holography.” https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV19RsJePECv/ (in Chinese). – 65 –

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.