Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 100 references

Sucrose ester surfactants: current understanding and emerging perspectives

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that two molecular dials, esterification degree and fatty acid chain length, set how a sucrose ester formulation behaves.

desk verdict A competent, honest review whose practical selection rule for sucrose esters is useful but oversold in the abstract given commercial lot variability. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.05535 v1 pith:ESJXNWVI submitted 2025-05-08 cond-mat.soft

Diana Cholakova , Slavka Tcholakova This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.soft
keywords sucroseestersphasebehaviorhydrophilic-lipophilicbalancemonoester-diesterratiowormlikemicellesfoamsemulsionsoleogels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that the practical behavior of sucrose ester surfactants is governed by two tunable molecular features: the number of fatty acid chains attached to the sucrose ring (monoesters versus di- and polyesters), which sets the hydrophilic-lipophilic balance, and the length of those chains, which sets the phase behavior. If that is right, a formulator can choose a commercial sucrose ester mainly by its monoester content and tail length and thereby select for aqueous foams, emulsions, wormlike-micelle gels, or oil-continuous structured products. The review assembles evidence from pure isomers and commercial mixtures: esterification position and chain length shift solid-to-liquid-crystal transition temperatures, the diester fraction controls a temperature-dependent viscosity peak in water, diesters stabilize foams at high temperature, and hydrogen bonding with triglyceride oils and co-surfactants opens routes to oleofoams and oleogels. The stakes are practical: these biodegradable, non-toxic surfactants could replace petrochemical nonionics in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals if the selection rules hold.

What carries the argument

The mechanism that carries the argument is the monoester/diester ratio acting through temperature-dependent self-assembly, together with the chain-length-dependent phase transitions of the sucrose ester molecules themselves. In bulk, sucrose esters pass from lamellar solid to a layered smectic A* liquid crystal, meaning ordered layers with disorder within each layer, and then to isotropic liquid; the paper uses these transitions to explain why foams and emulsions are best made with fluid tails and best stored with frozen tails. In water, the load-bearing structural event is the thermally driven exchange of diester molecules between solid-like nanoparticles and mixed wormlike micelles, which produces the reversible viscosity maximum of dilute solutions. A second mechanism is hydrogen bonding: sucrose hydroxyls can bond to each other, to triglycerides, or to co-surfactants such as lecithin and phosphatidylethanolamine, and the paper invokes such bonds to explain oleogels, oleofoams, and water-in-oil emulsions.

What would settle it

Purify one commercial sucrose ester grade, for example S970, into monoester and diester fractions, recombine them in controlled ratios, and measure the cloud point, viscosity peak, and foam lifetime; if the behavior does not track the measured diester fraction, the paper's central mechanism fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that sucrose esters are not a single surfactant class but a continuously tunable family whose behavior is set by two dials. The first dial is the degree of esterification: sucrose has eight hydroxyl groups, so products range from hydrophilic monoesters to hydrophobic octaesters, and commercial samples are mixtures in which the monoester fraction determines the producer-stated hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (roughly twenty times the percentage of monoesters). The second dial is the fatty acid chain length and, notably, the position at which the chain is attached to the sucrose; both move the phase transition temperatures between lamellar solid, a layered smectic A* liquid crystal with no order inside the layers, and isotropic liquid. In water, the diester fraction is the main actor behind the unusual viscosity peak near 40–50 °C: at low temperature diesters phase-separate into nanoparticles, and on heating they join monoesters in wormlike micelles that thicken the solution, then partially expel as drops. The same molecular variables, plus hydrogen bonding between sucrose hydroxyls and triglyceride carbonyls or co-surfactants, are used to explain stable foams, emulsions, foamulsions, oleogels, and oleofoams.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that commercial sucrose ester samples from different studies are comparable even though each is a mixture of molecules with different numbers of attached chains, different chain lengths, and different attachment sites on the sugar.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For aqueous foams and emulsions, choose sucrose esters with higher monoester content and shorter tails to make the system, then let the tails solidify after foaming or emulsification to lock in long-term stability.
  • A moderate diester fraction, up to roughly 50 percent, should be treated as a feature rather than an impurity: it stabilizes foams at elevated temperatures and drives the wormlike-micelle viscosity peak that enables gel-like aqueous formulations.
  • For oil-continuous products such as water-in-oil emulsions, oleogels, and oleofoams, frozen surfactant tails and hydrogen bonding with the oil or a co-surfactant are the design levers, often allowing stable structures at low surfactant content.
  • Because all sucrose esters share the same sucrose headgroup, their cloud-point-like behavior in water is set by diester solubility rather than by headgroup dehydration, so the conventional nonionic-surfactant cloud-point logic should be revised for sucrose esters.
  • The same two selection knobs, esterification degree and chain length, give a path to replacing ethoxylated or sorbitan-based petrochemical surfactants in food, cosmetic, and pharmaceutical formulations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A consequence the authors leave implicit: if the diester-solubilization mechanism is right, HLB numbers alone are an incomplete specification, and two commercial lots with the same producer HLB but different positional-isomer distributions could produce different foams, gels, and emulsion stabilities.
  • The hydrogen-bonding picture suggests a testable extension: with chain length matched, sucrose esters carrying more free hydroxyl groups should complex more strongly with triglyceride oils, so oil-foam stability and oleogel hardness should rise with monoester content.
  • The same temperature-driven monoester/diester exchange that thickens solutions near 40–50 °C could be engineered into thermoresponsive products, where a modest temperature change triggers gelation, thinning, or droplet coalescence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This review surveys the current understanding of sucrose ester (SE) surfactants, covering their solid-state thermotropic phase behavior, self-assembly in water (CMC, micellar structures, rheology, cloud-point phenomena), and their performance in foams, emulsions, foamulsions, oleogels, and oleofoams. The central claim, stated in the abstract and conclusions, is that SE performance can be tailored primarily by the monoester-to-polyester ratio (which sets the HLB) and by the fatty-acid chain length, with hydrogen-bonding capacity providing additional routes to formulation outcomes. The review synthesizes published data on pure regioisomers and on commercial SE mixtures, identifies several discrepancies in the literature (e.g., glass-transition observations, non-monotonic melting temperatures, scattered CMC values), and proposes mechanistic interpretations, often drawing on the authors' own recent studies.

Significance. If the synthesis is correct, the review provides a useful organizing framework for a commercially important class of bio-based surfactants. Its strengths are that it is comprehensive, clearly organized, and unusually honest about conflicting data: the authors explicitly note that the glass transition reported for high-monoester SEs was not reproduced in their own DSC data, that the C18 melting trend 'may be due to impurities,' that CMC comparisons are compromised by purity differences, and that the mechanism of the negative zeta potential is unresolved. The paper also offers a plausible new interpretation of the apparent 'cloud point' of sucrose esters in terms of diester precipitation rather than headgroup dehydration. These candid limitations make the review a useful point of departure for future work, even though the evidence base does not yet support a robust predictive model.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Section 9 (Conclusions)] The abstract states that SEs provide versatile properties determined by the degree of esterification and that the fatty-acid chain length 'allows creation of tailored formulations for specific applications.' This overstates the predictive power of the evidence assembled in the body. Section 3 reports CMC values for C8 SEs ranging from 2.3 to 30 mM across studies, Section 2 reports a non-monotonic C18 melting trend that the authors themselves attribute to possible impurities, and Section 7 documents contradictory oleogel results for low- versus high-monoester SEs. The Conclusions list the three factors without carrying these caveats forward. I recommend adding an explicit statement in the abstract and in the Conclusions that the correlation between composition/chain length and formulation performance is qualitative and currently limited by the lack of composition-level characterization of commercial SEs, and that the two variables are necessary but not sufficient predictors.
  2. [Sections 2 and 3 (comparability of commercial SEs across studies)] The review systematically compares data from pure regioisomers (Refs. [7,22*]) with data from commercial mixtures (Ref. [27], Table 1) and compares CMC values from sources that the authors themselves say differ in purity (Section 3). The authors acknowledge these issues in passing, but they do not address the underlying premise that commercial SE lots carrying the same product code (e.g., P1670, S1670, L1695) are interchangeable across studies. Given that Section 2 shows that the position of acyl attachment changes transition temperatures by up to 20 °C, isomer distribution alone could mask or amplify the chain-length and monoester-content trends used in the synthesis. The manuscript would be strengthened by a dedicated paragraph (or a small table) summarizing the compositional uncertainty of commercial SE samples and a statement in Section 2 explaining how the comparison of long spacings of P1670/S1670 (4.14 nm) with pure monoester (4.13 nm) and diester data is affected by the unknown di/polyester and isomer content.
  3. [Section 3 (rheology and cloud-point reinterpretation)] The interpretation that the viscosity increase in dilute SE solutions is 'mostly governed by the presence of diesters molecules' and the associated re-interpretation of the cloud-point data in Ref. [42] rest on a single study [28] performed with one SE composition (ca. 80% monoesters, C16:C18 ≈ 4:1). While the authors appropriately frame this as an interpretation ('could be slightly revised'), the review would be more balanced if it explicitly stated that the mechanism has not yet been tested with other SE compositions, purified diester fractions, or direct solubilization measurements of diesters in monoester micelles. This would prevent readers from treating the proposed mechanism as an established result.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2] The three-phase contact angles are reported as 'θ ≈ 101°C' and 'θ ≈ 112°C'; the unit should be degrees, not degrees Celsius (two occurrences near the end of the section).
  2. [Section 2] The phrase 'took out from the chloroform' should be 'taken out of the chloroform'.
  3. [Section 3] 'no significant dependence from the surfactant concentration' should read 'no significant dependence on the surfactant concentration'.
  4. [Section 4] The heading 'The foams stability' should be 'The foam stability' or 'The stability of the foams'.
  5. [Section 5.3] The phrase 'in an expense for a shrink linear viscoelastic region' is awkward; it should be 'at the expense of a narrower linear viscoelastic region'.
  6. [Section 8] 'A little or no foaming was observed' should be 'Little or no foaming was observed'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the review synthesizes independent literature and does not present fitted or self-referential predictions.

full rationale

This is a narrative review, not a derivation-based paper, and no claim reduces to its own input. The central statement that sucrose ester hydrophilicity is set by the degree of esterification is explicitly tied by the authors to the producer convention HLB ≈ 20 × (monoester content %)/100 (Section 2), i.e. it is presented as a definitional industry notation rather than as an independently derived prediction, so no circularity burden arises. The phase-behavior trends for pure monoesters and diesters are taken from external synthetic-chemistry studies (Refs [7,22*,23]); CMC comparisons are taken from external sources (Refs [5,17**,31–33]) with explicit caveats about differing purities and methods; and the commercial-sample phase behavior is taken from Ref [27]. The authors' own work (Refs [16*,17**,28]) is cited as one set of literature results among many, and where their data disagree with an earlier report (the glass transition in Ref [27] not reproduced in their own DSC data) the discrepancy is disclosed rather than used to force a conclusion. The review's practical selection rule (monoester content and tail length matter) is a synthesis of externally falsifiable, independently published observations, not a quantity fitted to data and then renamed a prediction. Self-citations are numerous but are used as ordinary literature support, not as an unverified premise on which the review's conclusions uniquely rest. No circular step can be exhibited by equation or construction; the appropriate finding is therefore score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities or free parameters are introduced; this is a literature review. The implicit assumptions above concern comparability of commercial surfactant mixtures and the adequacy of HLB as a descriptor.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Producer-stated HLB computed as 20 times the monoester mass fraction is an adequate predictor of SE behavior in formulations.
    Used throughout Sections 3 to 8 to compare surfactants from different studies. Section 2 itself notes this HLB definition can deviate by about one unit from the producer-stated value.
  • domain assumption Commercial SE samples with similar letter-number codes are comparable across independent studies despite differences in isomer distribution, chain purity, and measurement method.
    Section 3 compares CMC values from Refs [5,17,31-33] obtained with different methods and purities, and Section 2 mixes pure-isomer data with data on commercial mixtures.
  • domain assumption Phase behavior measured for pure positional isomers transfers to commercial polydisperse mixtures.
    The review uses pure 6-O and 1'-O sucrose ester phase diagrams to interpret the melting and SAXS behavior of commercial products in Table 1 and Sections 2 and 3.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Sucrose ester surfactants: current understanding and emerging perspectives." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ESJXNWVI

@misc{pith2026250505535,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Sucrose ester surfactants: current understanding and emerging perspectives},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ESJXNWVI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.05535}
}
read the original abstract

Sucrose esters (SEs), derived from sucrose and fatty acids, are biodegradable and non-toxic surfactants increasingly favored as substitutes for petrochemically-synthesized ones in food, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. SEs provide versatile hydrophilic-lipophilic properties, determined by the degree of sucrose esterification ranging from one to eight. The length of the fatty acid residues further influences the phase behavior of SEs, allowing creation of tailored formulations for specific applications. This review provides insights about our current understanding of the SEs phase behavior, their aggregation in aqueous and oily solutions, and its correlation with formulation outcomes. Furthermore, an overview of recent studies investigating SEs in various colloidal systems, incl. emulsions, foams, oleogels, and others, is provided. Novel concepts are discussed alongside future research directions, emphasizing the SEs potential as sustainable, functional ingredients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.05535 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a,b) General structure of sucrose: (a) monoester (ME) and (b) diester (DE) molecules. The numbers placed next to part of the oxygen atoms denote the positions of the hydroxyl groups within the sucrose molecule. (c,d) Phase diagrams for sucrose monoesters (c) and diesters (d) of high purity. The empty symbols represent the crystal-to-smectic A* phase transition temperatures, whereas the filled symbols show the smect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Rheological behavior of commercial SE surfactant (C16FA:C18FA ≈ 4:1, ca. 75% MEs). (a) Rheology as function of temperature for 1 and 5 wt. % SE solutions (filled symbols). The empty stars represent the rheology of solution containing the monoester fraction separated after ultracentrifugation of 5 wt. % initial solution (ME concentration ≈ 3 wt. %). (b) SAXS/WAXS spectra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Surfactant adsorption on air-water interface as a function of temperature. (b) Relative stability of foams, defined as percentage of remaining foam volume 10 min after the foam generation has been stopped. Foams are generated by Bartsch test from 1 wt. % surfactant solution at different temperatures. Red points: sucrose laurate (L1695); blue points: Brij L23 (polyoxyethylene (23) lauroyl ether). Data are adapted… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Mean drop diameter evolution upon storage at two different temperatures 23°C (blue triangles) and 40°C (red circles) for nanoemulsions prepared with 1 wt. % sucrose palmitate (SP90), 10 wt. % lemon oil and 89 wt. % 10 mM sodium dihydrogenphosphate buffer pH = 7 (pr…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of formation of H-bonds between sucrose esters and other type of molecules. (a) Oleogels formed from 10 wt. % sucrose ester (SE) + sunflower lecithin (SFL) dissolved in sunflower oil in various ratios. Gels are obtained for SE:SFL = 9:1 to 3:7 ratios, whereas th…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [28]

    Muller, J

    A.-S. Muller, J. Gagnaire, Y. Queneau, M. Karaoglanian, J. -P. Maitre, A. Bouchu, Winsor behaviour of sucrose fatty acid esters: choice of th e cosurfactant and effect of the surfactant composition, Colloids and Surfaces A 203 (2002) 55–66. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(01)01067- 6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0927-7757(01)01067- 2002

  2. [7]

    Oleogels Several studies have explored the opportunity to use SEs as oleogelators , which should be able to structure liquid vegetable oil into a three -dimensional network forming an oleogel [ 78-81]. Oleogels have attracted significant interest in recent years due to their potential for usage as alternative to saturated and trans fats u sage in the lipi...

    2017

  3. [27]

    Goodby, V

    J. Goodby, V. Görtz, S. Cowling, G. Mackenzie, P. Martin, D. Plusquellec, T. Benvegnu, P. Boullanger, D. Lafont, Y. Queneau, S. Chamberte, J. Fitremann, Thermotropic liquid crystalline glycolipids, Chem. Soc. Rev. 36 (2007) 1971–2032. doi: 10.1039/B708458G

    work page doi:10.1039/b708458g 2007

  4. [42]

    Molinier, B

    V. Molinier, B. Fenet, J. Fitremann, A. Bouchu, Y. Queneau, PFGSE -NMR study of the self - diffusion of sucrose fatty acid monoesters in water, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 286 (2005) 360 –

    2005

  5. [1]

    Y. Teng, S. G. Stewart, Y. -W. Hai, Z. Li, M. G. Banwell, P. Lan, Sucrose fatty acid esters: synthesis, emu lsifying capacities, biological activities and structure -property profiles, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 61 (2021) 3297-3317. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1798346

    arXiv 2021

  6. [2]

    N. Neta, J. Teixeira, L. Rodrigues, Sugar ester surfactants: Enzymatic synthesis and applications in food industry, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 55 (2015) 595 –610. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.667461

    arXiv 2015

  7. [3]

    cloud point

    Sucrose esters self-assembly in aqueous media Sucrose ester molecules spontaneously self -assemble into supramolecular structures (micelles, vesicles, lamellar phases, etc.) once their concentration into the aqueous phase exceeds the critical micellar (aggregation) concentration (CMC/CAC). As expected for nonionic surfactants, the CMC values are found to ...

  8. [4]

    Foam properties of sucrose esters The foaming and i nterfacial properties of sucrose monolaurate (L1695) were studied by Husband et al. [50]. In this study the authors showed that this commercial surfactant (containing both laurate mono- and di-esters) exhibits better foamability than the individual pure sucrose monolaurate and sucrose dilaurate. Furtherm...

Show all 100 references
  1. [5]

    Owing to their varying hydrophilic -lipophilic properties, they can be used to stabilize both oil-in-water (o/w) and water -in-oil (w/o) emulsion systems

    Emulsions Sucrose esters have been widely studied as emulsifiers, especially in food industry [1,12,54,55]. Owing to their varying hydrophilic -lipophilic properties, they can be used to stabilize both oil-in-water (o/w) and water -in-oil (w/o) emulsion systems. In this sectio...

  2. [6]

    Foamulsions are broadly spread in food industry, e.g

    Foamed emulsions (foamulsions) The crystallization ability of the SEs upon cooling is also widely used for preparation of stable foamed emulsions (foamulsions) [ 18,70-74]. Foamulsions are broadly spread in food industry, e.g. whipped creams and ice -creams are foamulsions [ 7...

  3. [8]

    These authors explored the possibility for formation of stable foams in which the continuous phase was comprised of oil molecules (oleofoams)

    Oleofoams Another intriguing usage of SEs and their temperature -responsive properties was demonstrated in the study of Liu and Binks [ 82**]. These authors explored the possibility for formation of stable foams in which the continuous phase was comprised of oil molecules (ole...

  4. [9]

    Remarkably, these surfactants exhibit behavior that is comparable to, or even superior to the one known for conventional nonionic alcohol ethoxylates

    Conclusions and outlook The present review highlights the broad versatility of sucrose esters across diverse colloidal systems. Remarkably, these surfactants exhibit behavior that is comparable to, or even superior to the one known for conventional nonionic alcohol ethoxylates...

  5. [10]

    S.-H. Pyo, J. Chen, R. Ye, D. Hayes, Sugar Esters (Chapter 10), in: Biobased Surfactants (Second Edition). Synthesis, Properties, and Applications, 2019, Pages 325 -363. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-812705-6.00010-1

    2019 doi

  6. [11]

    Zhu, M.-Y

    J.-P. Zhu, M.-Y. Liang, Y.-R. Ma, L. White, M. Banwell, Y. Teng, P. Lan, Enzymatic synthesis of an homologous series of long - and very long -chain sucrose esters and evaluation of their emulsifying and biological properties, Food Hydrocolloids 124 (2022) 107149. doi: 10.1016/...

    2022

  7. [12]

    Krawczyk, Aggregation properties of sucrose fatty acid esters and some other sugar -based surfactants at different temperatures, J

    J. Krawczyk, Aggregation properties of sucrose fatty acid esters and some other sugar -based surfactants at different temperatures, J. Molecular Liquids 27 1 (2018) 610 –620. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2018.09.013

    2018 doi

  8. [13]

    Y. Ning, L. Hou, M. Ma, M. Li, Z. Zhao, D. Zhang, Z. Wang, Y. Jia, Synergistic antibacterial mechanism of sucrose laurate combined with nisin against Staphylococcus aureus and its application in milk beverage, LWT 158 (2022) 113145. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113145

    2022

  9. [14]

    Molinier, P

    V. Molinier, P. Kouwer, J. Fitremann, A. Bouchu, G. Mackenzie, Y. Queneau, J. Goodby, Self- organizing properties of monosubstituted sucrose fatty acid esters: The effects of chain length and unsaturation, Chem. A Eur. J. 12 (2006) 3547–3557. doi: 10.1002/chem.200500773

    2006 doi

  10. [15]

    Verboni, D

    M. Verboni, D. Perinelli, C. Qiu, M. Tiboni, A. Aluigi, S. Lucarini, J. Lam, A. Duranti, Synthesis and properties of sucrose - and lactose-based aromatic ester surfactants as potentia l drugs permeability enhancers, Pharmaceuticals 16 (2023) 223. doi: 10.3390/ph16020223

    2023 doi

  11. [16]

    Khorshid, M

    *S. Khorshid, M. Montanari, S. Benedetti, S. Moroni, A. Aluigi, B. Canonico, S. Papa, M. Tiboni, L. Casettari, A microfluidic approach to fabricate sucrose decorated lip osomes with increased uptake in breast cancer cells, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 178 (2022) 53 –64. doi: 10.10...

    2022 doi

  12. [17]

    Szűts, P

    A. Szűts, P. Szabó -Révész, Sucrose esters as natural surfactants in drug delivery systems - A mini-review, Int. J. Pharm. 433 (2012) 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.076

    2012 doi

  13. [18]

    Vargas, J

    J. Vargas, J. Ortega, G. Metzker, J. Larrahondo, M. Boscolo, Natural sucrose esters: Perspectives on the chemical and physiological use of an under investigated chemical class of compounds, Phytochem. 177 (2020) 112433. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2020.112433

    2020

  14. [19]

    B. A. P. Nelen, J. M. Cooper, Sucrose esters, in: R. J. Whitehurst (Ed.), Emulsifiers in food technology, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Northampton, UK, 2004, pp. 131-161. 28

    2004

  15. [20]

    X. Hu, B. Binks , Z. Cui, Edible oil -in-water emulsions stabilized by hydrophile -lipophile balanced sucrose ester, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 100 (2023) 711–721. doi: 10.1002/aocs.12698

    2023 doi

  16. [21]

    Fernandes, A

    R. Fernandes, A. Simiqueli, M. Vidigal, V. Minim, L. Minim, Kinetic stability of the oil -in- water emulsions and dynamic interfacial properties of mixtures of sucrose esters and polysaccharides, Food Chem. 357 (2021) 129693. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129693

    2021

  17. [22]

    X. Hu, B. Binks, Z. Cui, High internal phase emulsions stabilized by adsorbed sucrose stearate molecules and dispersed vesicles, Food Hydrocolloids 121 (2021) 107002. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107002

    2021

  18. [23]

    Mustan, N

    F. Mustan, N. Politova -Brinkova, Z. Vinarov, D. Rossetti, P. Rayment, S. Tcholakova, Interplay between bulk aggregates, surface properties an d foam stability of nonionic surfactants, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 302 (2022) 102618. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2022.102618

    2022

  19. [24]

    Delforce, S

    **L. Delforce, S. Tcholakova, Role of temperature and urea for surface and foam properties of nonionic surfactants with dodecyl alkyl ch ain, Colloids Surf. A 691 (2024) 133844. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133844 This work demonstrates that a mixtures of sucrose mono - and di...

    2024

  20. [25]

    Zheng, X

    R. Zheng, X. Hu, C. Su, J. Jiang, Z. Cui, B. Binks, Edible oil-water foamulsions stabilized by vesicle network of sucrose ester, J. Molecular Liquids 371 (2023) 121066. doi: 10.1016/j.molliq.2022.121066

    2023

  21. [26]

    Herrington, S

    T. Herrington, S. Sahi, Phase behavior of some sucrose surfactants with water and n-decane, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 65 (1988) 1677-1681. doi: 10.1007/BF02912575

    1988 doi

  22. [29]

    Molinier, P

    *V. Molinier, P. J. J. Kouwer, J. Fitremann, A . Bouchu, G. Machenzie, Y. Quaneau, J. Q. Goodby, Shape dependence in the formation of condensed phases exhibited by disubstituted sucrose esters, Chem. – Eur. J. 13 (2007) 1763-1775. doi: 10.1002/chem.200600368 A detailed charact...

    2007 doi

  23. [30]

    Molinier, P

    V. Molinier, P. Kouwer, Y. Queneau, J. Fitremann, G. Mackenzie, J. Goodby, A bilayer to monolayer phase transition in liquid crystal glycolipids, Chem. Commun. 23 (2003) 2860 –

    2003

  24. [31]

    Becerra, C

    N. Becerra, C. Toro, A. Zanocco, E. Lemp, G. Günther, Characterization of micelles formed by sucrose 6 -O-monoesters, Colloids and Surfaces A 327 (2008) 134 –139. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2008.06.012

    2008 doi

  25. [32]

    Cholakova, N

    *D. Cholakova, N. Denkov, Polymorphic phase transitions in triglycerides and th eir mixtures studied by SAXS/WAXS techniques: In bulk and in emulsions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 323 (2024) 103071. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2023.103071 29 Comprehensive overview of the main factors a...

    2024

  26. [33]

    Dierking, S

    I. Dierking, S. Al -Zangana, Lyotropic liquid crystal phases from anisotropic nanomaterials, Nanomaterials 7 (2017) 305. doi: 10.3390/nano7100305

    2017 doi

  27. [34]

    Cholakova, M

    D. Cholakova, M. Pantov, S. Tcholakova, N. Denkov, Structure of rotator phases formed in C13-C21 alkanes in their mixtures: In bulk and in emulsion drops, Cryst. Growth Des. 24 (2024) 362-377. doi: 10.1021/acs.cgd.3c01088

    2024 doi

  28. [35]

    Szűts, E

    A. Szűts, E. Pallagi, G. Regdon Jr., Z. Aigner, P. Szabó-Révész, Study of thermal behaviour of sugar esters, Int. J. Pharm. 336 (2007) 199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.11.053

    2007 doi

  29. [36]

    Pagureva, D

    N. Pagureva, D. Cholakova, Z. Mitrinova, M. Hristova, N. Burdzhiev, S. Tcholakova, Temperature response of sucrose palmitate solutions: Role of ratio between monoesters and diesters, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 674 (2024) 209-224. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2024.06.061

    2024 doi

  30. [37]

    Maruyama, M

    T. Maruyama, M. Nakajima, S. Ichikawa, Y. Sano, H. Nabetani, S. Furusaki, M. Seki, Small - angle X-ray scattering analysis of stearic acid modified lipase, Biosci., Biotechn., Biochem. 65 (2001) 1003–1006. doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.1003

    2001 doi

  31. [38]

    M. Wang, Y. Zhou, L. Fan, J. Li, Effect of type of fatty acid attached to sucrose ester on the stability of water -in-oil Pickering emulsion, J. Food Eng. 374 (2024) 112036. doi: 10.1016/j.foodeng.2024.112036

    2024

  32. [39]

    Varade, K

    D. Varade, K. Ushiyama, L. K. Shrestha, K. Aramaki, Wormlike micelles in Tween 80/CmEO3 mixed nonionic surfactant systems in aqueous media, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 312 (2007) 489-

    2007

  33. [40]

    Garofalakis, B

    G. Garofalakis, B. Murray, D. Sarney, Surface activity and critical aggrega tion concentration of pure sugar esters with different sugar headgroups, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 229 (2000) 391–

    2000

  34. [41]

    Z. Chu, C. A. Dreiss, Y. Feng, Smart wormlike micelles, Chem. Rev. Soc. 42 (2013) 7174 -

    2013

  35. [43]

    D. J. McClements, Food Emulsions: Principles, Practices, and Techniques, third ed., CRC Press, Boca Raton, U. S

  36. [44]

    Nonionic surfactants. Vol. I. Edited by Martin J. Schick. Marcel Dekker, Inc., 95 Madison Avenue, New York, N. Y. 10016, 1966

    1966

  37. [45]

    Sanchez, E

    S. Sanchez, E. Gratton, A. Zanocco, E. Lemp, G. Gunther, Sucrose monoester micelles size determined by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy (FCS), PLoS ONE 6 (2015) e29278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029278

    2015 doi

  38. [46]

    Takahashi, I

    S. Takahashi, I. Kaneda, A transient network structure in sucrose stearate/water systems, Nihon Reoroji Gakkaishi, J. Soc. Rheology, Japan 42 (2014) 103-109, doi: 10.1678/rheology.42.103

    2014 doi

  39. [47]

    Calahorro , J

    C. Calahorro , J. Muñoz, M. Berjano, A. Guerrero, C. Gallegos, Flow behavior of sucrose stearate/water systems, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 69 (1992) 660-666, doi: 10.1007/BF02635806

    1992 doi

  40. [48]

    Szűts, M

    A. Szűts, M. Budai-Szűcs, I. Eros, N. Otomo, P. Szabo-Revesz, Study of gel-forming properties of sucrose esters for thermosensitive drug delivery systems, Int. J. Pharm. 383 (2010) 132-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2009.09.013 30

    2010 doi

  41. [49]

    J. Zhou, X. Meng, Effect of glycerol incorporation on the liquid crystal structure of sucrose fatty acid ester in aqueous solution, Colloids and Surfaces A 684 (2024) 133213. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.133213

    2024

  42. [50]

    Husband, D

    F. Husband, D. Sarney, M. Barnard, P. Wilde, Comparison of foaming and interfacial properties of pure sucrose monolaurates, dilaurate and commercial preparations, Food Hydrocolloids 12 (1998) 237–244. doi: 10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00036-8

    1998 doi

  43. [51]

    S. C. Sharma, L. K. Shrestha, K. Tsuchiya, K. Sakai, H. Sakai, M. Abe, Viscoelastic wormlike micelles of long polyoxyethylene chain phytosterol with lipophilic nonionic surfactant in aqueous solution, J. Phys. Chem. B 113 (2009) 3043-3050. doi: 10.1021/jp8102244

    2009 doi

  44. [52]

    Dressaire, R

    **E. Dressaire, R. Bee, D. Bell, A. Lips, H. Stone, Interfacial polygonal nanopatterning of stable microbubbles, Science 320 (2008) 1198–1201. doi: 10.1126/science.1154601 31 This work demonst rates the formation of ultra -stable foams (for more than a year) from a mixture of ...

    2008 doi

  45. [53]

    Mustan, N

    F. Mustan, N. Politova -Brinkova, D. Rossetti, P. Rayment, S. Tcholakova, Oil soluble surfactants as efficient foam stabilizers, Colloids Surf . A 633 (2022) 127874. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.127874

    2022

  46. [54]

    Md. H. Kabir, K. Aramaki, M. Is hitobi, H. Kuneida, Cloud point and formation of microemulsions in sucrose dodecanoate systems, Colloids Surf. A 216 (2003) 65 -74. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(02)00498-3

    2003 doi

  47. [55]

    Ariyaprakai, K

    S. Ariyaprakai, K. Tananuwong, Freeze -thaw stability of edible oil -in-water emulsions stabilized by sucr ose esters and Tweens, J. Food Eng. 152 (2015) 57 -64. doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.11.023

    2015 doi

  48. [56]

    Miyake, Y

    M. Miyake, Y. Yamashita, Chapter 24: Molecular structure and phase behavior of surfactants, in: K. Sakamoto, R. Y. Lochhead, H. I. Maibach, Y. Yamashita (Eds.), Cosmetic Science and Technology: Theoretical Principles and Applications , Elsevier, 2017, pp. 389 -414. doi: 10.101...

    2017 doi

  49. [57]

    Aramaki, S

    K. Aramaki, S. Hoshida, S. Arima, Effect of carbon length of cosurfactant on the rheological properties of nonionic wormlike micellar solutions formed by a sugar surfactant and monohydroxy alcohols, Colloids Surf. A 366 (2010) 58 -62. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.05.011

    2010 doi

  50. [58]

    Aramaki, S

    K. Aramaki, S. Hoshida, S. Arima, Formation of wormlike micelles with natural -sourced ingredients (sucrose fatty acid ester and fatty acid) and a viscosity -boosting effect induced by fatty acid soap, Colloids Surf. A 396 (2012) 278-282. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2012.01.009

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    Yamamoto, H

    M. Yamamoto, H. Ando, S. Arima, K. Aramaki, Rheological properties of wormlike micellar solutions being available in wide temperature range in sucrose pal mitate systems, J. Oleo Sci. 58 (2009) 303-311. doi: 10.5650/jos.58.303

    2009 doi

  52. [60]

    T. Sato, D. P. Acharya, M. Kaneko, K. Aramaki, Y. Singh, M. Ishitobi, H. Kunieda, Oil-induced structural change of wormlike micelles in sugar surfactant systems, J. Disp. Sci. Tech. 27 (2006) 611-616. doi: 10.1080/01932690600660632

    2006 doi

  53. [61]

    Cholakova, Z

    D. Cholakova, Z. Vinarov, S. Tcholakova, N. D. Denkov, Self -emulsification in chemical and pharmaceutical technologies, Curr. Opin. Col loid Interface Sci. 59 (2022) 101576. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2022.101576

    2022

  54. [62]

    Klang, N

    V. Klang, N. Matsko, K. Raupach, N. El -Hagin, C. Valeta, Development of sucrose stearate - based nanoemulsions and optimization through γ -cyclodextrin, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 79 (2011) 58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2011.01.010

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    S. E. H. J. Kempen, H. A. Schols, E. Linden, L. M. C. Sagis, Effect of variations in the fatty acid chain of oligofructose fatty acid esters on their foaming functionali ty, Food Biophys. 9 (2014) 114-124. doi: 10.1007/s11483-013-9324-1

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    Vlaia, G

    L. Vlaia, G. Coneac, A. Muţ, I. Olariu, V. Vlaia, D. Anghel, M. Maxim, A. Dobrescu, M. Hîrjău, D. Lupuleasa, Topical biocompatible fluconazole -loaded microemulsions based on essential oils and sucrose esters: Formulation design based o n pseudo -ternary phase diagrams and phy...

    2021 doi

  57. [65]

    Anuar, A

    N. Anuar, A. H. Sabri, T. J. B. Effendi, K. A. Hamid, Development and characterization of ibuprofen-loaded nanoemulsions with enhanced oral bioavailability, Heliyon 6 (2020) e04570. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04570

    2020 doi

  58. [66]

    Soultani, S

    S. Soultani, S. Ognier, J. -M. Engasser, M. Ghoul, Comparative study of some surface active properties of fructose esters and commercial sucrose esters, Colloids Surf. A 227 (2003) 35-44. doi: 10.1016/S0927-7757(03)00360-1

    2003 doi

  59. [67]

    *X. Hu, B. Binks, Z. Cui, Water -in-oil Pickering emulsions stabilized by edible surfactant crystals formed in situ , Food Hydrocolloids 125 (2022) 107394. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107394 This work demonstrates the formation of temperature sensitive water -in-oil emulsions ...

    2022

  60. [68]

    Y. Liu, Q. Wu, J. Zhang, X. Mao, Effect of synergism of sucrose ester and xanthan gum on the stability of walnut milk, J. Sci. Food Agric. 104 (2024) 1909-1919. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13075

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Y. Guo, J. Li, X. Zhou, Y. Tang, X. Zeng, Formulation of lyotropic liquid crystal emulsion based on natural sucrose ester and its tribological behavior as novel lubricant, Friction 10 (2022) 1879–1892. doi: 10.1007/s40544-021-0565-6

    2022 doi

  62. [70]

    J. Rao, D. McClements, Food -grade microemulsions, nanoemulsions and emulsions: Fabrication from sucrose monopalmitate & lemon oil, Food Hydrocolloids 25 (2011) 1413 –

    2011

  63. [71]

    D. Zeng, Y. Cai, T. Liu, L. Huang, J. Wang, M. Zhao, S. Zhu, Q. Zhao, Effect of hydrophobic sucrose esters with different fat acid composition and esterification degree on whipped cream properties, Food Hydrocolloids 146 (2024) 109183. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109183

    2024

  64. [72]

    J. Rao, D. McClements, Lemon oil solubilization in mixed surfactant solutions: Rationalizing microemulsion & nanoemulsion formation, Food Hydrocolloids 26 (2012) 268 –276. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.06.002

    2012 doi

  65. [73]

    Ariyaprakai, X

    S. Ariyaprakai, X. Hu, M. Tran, Spontaneous formation of flavor oil emulsions by using sucrose esters and emulsion stability study, Food Biophys. 14 (2019) 41–48. doi: 10.1007/s11483-018- 9555-2

    2019 doi

  66. [74]

    Fredrick, P

    E. Fredrick, P. Walstra, K. Dewettinck, Factors governing partial coalescence in oil -in-water emulsions, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 153 (2010) 30–42. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.10.003

    2010 doi

  67. [75]

    Dalgleish, Food emulsions - their structures and structure -forming properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 20 (2006) 415–422

    D. Dalgleish, Food emulsions - their structures and structure -forming properties, Food Hydrocolloids, 20 (2006) 415–422. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.10.009

    2006 doi

  68. [76]

    K. G. Marinova, R. G. Alargova, N. D. Denkov, O. D. Velev, D. N. Petsev, I. B. Ivanov, R. P. Borwankar, Charging of oil -water interfaces due to spontaneous adsorption of hydroxyl ions, Langmuir 12 (1996) 2045-2051. doi: 10.1021/la950928i

    1996 doi

  69. [77]

    Denkov, S

    N. Denkov, S. Tcholakova, D. Cholakova, Surface phase transitions in foams and emulsions, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 44 (2019) 32–47. doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2019.09.005

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    M. Lu, Y. Cao, C. -T. Ho, Q. H uang, Development of organogel -derived capsaicin nanoemulsion with improved bioaccessibility and reduced gastric mucosa irritation, J. Agric. Food Chem. 64 (2016) 4735–4741. doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01095

    2016 doi

  71. [79]

    Y. Gao, J. Mao, Z. Meng, Tracing distribution and interface behavior of water droplets in W/O emulsions with fat crystals, Food Res. Int. 163 (2023) 112215. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.112215

    2023

  72. [80]

    ethanol route

    *T. da Silva, V. Baeten, S. Danthine, Modifying s ucrose esters oleogels properties using different structuration routes, Food Chem. 405 (2023) 134927. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134927 This work demonstrates that oleogels with high hardness can be prepared when sucrose este...

    2023

  73. [81]

    M. Shu, Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, L. Fan, J. Li, Sucrose esters and beeswax synergize to improve the stability and viscoelasticity of water -in-oil emulsions, Foods 12 (2023) 3387. doi: 10.3390/foods12183387

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    **M. Wang, L. Fan, Y. Zhou, J. Li, Fabrication of water -in-oil high internal phase pickering emulsion using edible sucrose stearate/soybean phosphatidylethanolamine complex: Interfacial properties and stabilizatio n mechanism, J. Food Eng. 367 (2024) 111859. doi: 10.1016/j.jf...

    2024

  75. [83]

    Y. Li, T. Liao, T. Liu, J. Wang, Z. Sun, M. Zhao, X. Deng, Q. Zhao, Effect of stearic and oleic acid-based lipophilic emulsifiers on the crystallization of the fat blend and the stability of whipped cream, Food Chem. 428 (2023) 136762. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136762

    2023

  76. [84]

    Fameau, S

    A.-L. Fameau, S. Lam, A. Arnould, C. Gaillard, O. Velev, A. Saint-Jalmes, Smart nonaqueous foams from lipid -based oleogel, Langmuir 31 (2015) 13501 –13510. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b03660

    2015 doi

  77. [85]

    P. Xie, J. Jin, H. Xu, D. Wang, S. Fu, Q. Fan, Z. Gao, Y. Chen, Q. Jin, X. Wang, Effects of sucrose esters on whipping capabilities of aerated emulsions, Food Hydrocolloids 144 (2023) 108933. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108933

    2023

  78. [86]

    D. Zeng, Y. Cai, T. Liu, L. Huang, Y. Zeng, Q. Zhao, M. Zhao, The effect of sucrose esters S1570 on partial coalescence and whipping properties, Food Hydrocolloids 125 (2022) 107429. doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107429

    2022

  79. [87]

    N. D. Denkov, K. G. Marinova , Chapter 10: Antifoam effects of solid particles, oil drops and oil-solid compounds in aqueous foams, in: B. P. Binks, T. S Horozov (Eds.), Colloidal particles at liquid interfaces, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006, pp. 383-444

    2006

  80. [89]

    Kaneko, T

    N. Kaneko, T. Horie, S. Ueno, J. Yano, T. Katsuragi, K. Sato, Impurity effects on crystallization rates of n-hexadecane in oil -in-water emulsions, J. Crystal Growth 197 (1999) 263–270. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0248(98)00933-6 33

    1999 doi

  81. [92]

    Sintang, S

    M. Sintang, S. Danthine, A. Patel, T. Rimaux, D. Van De Walle, K. Dewettinck, Mixed surfactant systems of sucrose esters and lecithin as a synergistic approach for oil structuring, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 504 (2017) 387–396. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2017.05.114

    2017 doi

  82. [94]

    da Silva, S

    T. da Silva, S. Danthine, Sucrose esters as oleogelators in mono or binary structured oleogels using different oleogelation routes, Gels 9 (2023) 399. doi: 10.3390/gels9050399

    2023 doi

  83. [95]

    **Y. Liu, B. Binks, A novel strategy to fabricate stable oil foams with sucrose ester surfactant, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 594 (2021) 204–216. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.03.021 This work demonstrates that better foamability is achieved in the one phase region at higher temperat...

    2021 doi

  84. [96]

    M. Brun, M. Delample, E. Harte, S. Lecomte, F. Leal-Calderon, Stabilization of air bubbles in oil by surfactant crystals: A route to produce air-in-oil foams and air-in-oil-in-water emulsions, Food Res. Int. 67 (2015) 366–375. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2014.11.044

    2015 doi

  85. [98]

    Binks, E

    B. Binks, E. Garveya. J. Vieira, Whipped oil stabilized by surfactant crystals, Chem. Sci. 7 (2016) 2621–2632. doi: 10.1039/c6sc00046k

    2016 doi

  86. [99]

    Mishima, A

    S. Mishima, A. Suzuki, K. Sato, S. Ueno, Formation and microstructures of whipped oils composed of vegetable oils and high -melting fat crystals, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 93 (2016) 1453–1466. doi: 10.1007/s11746-016-2888-4

    2016 doi

  87. [368]

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.12.010

    2004 doi

  88. [398]

    doi: 10.1006/jcis.2000.7035

    2000

  89. [497]

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2007.02.090

    2007 doi

  90. [1423]

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.02.004

    2011 doi

  91. [2861]

    doi: 10.1039/b308880d

    doi

  92. [7203]

    doi: 10.1039/C3CS35490C

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.