Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Gauging the bosonic M2-brane's higher-form symmetries is obstructed by a mixed 't Hooft anomaly, whose cancellation by a 4D BF inflow term forces the continuous U(1) symmetries to break to discrete subgroups.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-02 22:29 UTC pith:EXRRD2UP

load-bearing objection A plausible HFS/gerbe mechanism for M2-branes, but the discrete Z_m breaking claim stumbles on a 2π normalization inconsistency that needs fixing before the paper can be relied on. the 4 major comments →

arxiv 2602.16582 v2 pith:EXRRD2UP submitted 2026-02-18 hep-th math-phmath.MP

M2-branes, Higher Form Symmetries and 1-Gerbes

Fabi\'an Caro-P\'erez , Mar\'ia Pilar Garc\'ia del Moral , \'Alvaro Restuccia This is my paper
classification hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords higher-form symmetriesM2-brane't Hooft anomalytorsion gerbetwisted torusWilson surfaceflux quantizationM-theory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper studies the higher-form symmetries of a closed bosonic M2-brane moving on M9×T2. It claims that these global symmetries cannot be gauged in the presence of background fields: the partition function picks up a mixed 't Hooft anomaly. The anomaly is canceled by an inflow term living on a four-manifold, built from a flat U(1) connection and a flat torsion gerbe on the worldvolume. Because the gerbe has a discrete transition jump 2πm/k, topological invariance of the symmetry operators forces exp(2π i α m/k)=1, so the continuous U(1) winding and monopole symmetries break to finite cyclic subgroups and a worldvolume flux quantization condition appears. If this is right, the M2-brane acquires discrete higher-form symmetries with a well-defined operator algebra, and the same mechanism could explain flux conditions that are known to make the supersymmetric membrane spectrum discrete.

Core claim

The central claim is that a consistent gauging of the M2-brane's higher-form symmetries requires a 4D BF inflow term, and that only a 2-form background with torsion topology makes the gauged theory well-defined. Taking the worldvolume to be a twisted torus with parabolic monodromy, the paper writes the gerbe connection as \tilde B = (m/k) dt∧dv. Its transition across a 2-cycle jumps by 2πm/k, and requiring the symmetry operator U_α(N) to be topological gives exp(2π i α m/k)=1, hence α∈(k/m)Z and the U(1) gauge group breaks to its discrete subgroup Z_m. The same mechanism breaks the dual winding symmetry to Z_n and produces a worldvolume flux condition. The resulting topological operators—the

What carries the argument

The machinery is the flat torsion G_1^{∇c}-gerbe on the M2 worldvolume, a higher U(1) bundle whose connection is locally a 2-form, globally has transition jumps ∫(B^+−B^-)=2πm/k, and whose holonomy is a Wilson surface valued in Z_k. It is paired with a BF inflow term T_TQFT = (1/2)∫_D B∧d\tilde B on a four-manifold bounding the worldvolume. The gerbe's torsion jump turns the condition that U_α(N) be topological into α∈(k/m)Z, which does the symmetry breaking; the pullback and transgression of the gerbe connection define the coupling of the winding current and the charge of the Wilson surface.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on treating the 2-form background as a flat torsion gerbe with transition jump 2πm/k, a choice not forced by anomaly cancellation, and on treating the bosonic M2 path integral as meaningful even though the paper acknowledges that bosonic p≥2 branes retain uncancelled quantum anomalies.

What would settle it

Take k=0 (trivial monodromy) or replace the torsion connection \tilde B=(m/k)dt∧dv by a flat but rationally irrational 2-form connection on T^3. If the BF inflow term still cancels the anomaly and U_α(N) remains topological for all α, then the discrete Z_m breaking is not a consequence of anomaly cancellation but of the extra torsion-gerbe assumption. Concretely, for a transition jump Δ=∫(B^+−B^-), topological invariance requires exp(iαΔ)=1; for Δ=2πλ with λ irrational this forces α=0, while for Δ=2πm/k it gives α∈(k/m)Z.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • A consistent gauging of the M2-brane's higher-form symmetries requires a mixed-'t-Hooft-anomaly inflow term of BF type on a four-manifold whose boundary is the worldvolume; without it, the partition function is not gauge invariant.
  • With a flat torsion gerbe on a twisted-torus worldvolume, topological invariance of the symmetry operators implies exp(2π i α m/k)=1, so the continuous U(1) monopole symmetry breaks to Z_m and the winding symmetry breaks to Z_n; the full symmetry group becomes a product of discrete factors.
  • The topological operator algebra is well-defined: the monopole operator U_α(N) acts on the vortex-dressed operator O_l through a linking-number phase, and the winding operator U_β(Q) acts on the pullback of the Wilson surface through a one-cycle linking.
  • The holonomy of the flat gerbe defines a Wilson surface valued in Z_k, which is the natural charged operator characterizing the M2-brane in this background.
  • If the mechanism extends to the supersymmetric membrane, the resulting worldvolume flux condition is of the same kind previously shown to make the toroidally compactified supermembrane spectrum discrete.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The anomaly cancellation and discrete breaking are worldvolume-topological effects independent of 11D supergravity dynamics, so the same two-gerbe mechanism should occur in any three-dimensional theory with dual conserved U(1) currents and a compact target torus.
  • The condition exp(2π i α m/k)=1 is a level-k BF charge-quantization statement; a direct canonical quantization of the gauged 3D action should yield the same charges and would test whether the discrete subgroup depends only on k or also on the gerbe parameter m.
  • Turning on a non-flat M-theory three-form curvature would likely deform the torsion gerbe and could restore part of the continuous U(1); locating that transition would separate the pure topology input from dynamical effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies higher-form symmetries (HFS) of the closed bosonic M2-brane on M9×T2. It claims that gauging the winding and monopole U(1) symmetries produces a mixed 't Hooft anomaly, which is cancelled by a 4D BF inflow term built from a flat U(1) connection and a torsion G1^∇c-gerbe. The torsion gerbe is argued to break the continuous U(1) symmetries to discrete subgroups, impose a worldvolume flux condition, and give rise to a consistent operator algebra of topological defects (winding, monopole, vortex-dressed, and Wilson-surface operators).

Significance. If the central derivation were sound, the paper would be a novel application of generalized-symmetry techniques to M2-brane theory, connecting anomaly inflow with gerbe structures and the previously studied flux-quantization/discrete-spectrum conjecture. The BF-type anomaly-inflow mechanism is standard, and the paper contains explicit constructions of the relevant topological operators and their linking algebra. However, the manuscript as written has several load-bearing technical inconsistencies in the derivation of the anomaly, the normalization of the gerbe transition, and the discrete breaking group, so the main result is not presently established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (23)] The claimed anomaly δS = -1/2 ∫ B∧dΛ_1 is not derived and, on direct computation, does not follow from the gauge transformations (20)-(22). Varying the action (19) under X→X+ε, B→B+dε, B̃→B̃+dΛ_1 gives δS = 1/2 ∫ dΛ_1∧(dX-B) (since dX-B is invariant and B̃ shifts), not -1/2 ∫ B∧dΛ_1. For closed B this variation vanishes, contradicting (23). The subsequent cancellation in Appendix A uses δ(S+S_ct)=1/2 ∫ B̃∧dε, i.e. the anomaly after the counterterm, not the formula (23). The anomaly needs to be derived explicitly and consistently from the action; without this, the central claim of a mixed 't Hooft anomaly is unsupported.
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (42)-(43) vs. §4.1, Eq. (82)] The two evaluations of the gerbe transition are inconsistent. In §3.2, Eq. (42) states ∫_{Σ2}(B̃^+ - B̃^-) = 2π m/k, while in §4.1, Eq. (82) gives ∫_{Σ01}(B̃^+ - B̃^-) = m/k with no 2π. Using the paper's own topological condition (41), exp(iα ∫(B̃^+-B̃^-))=1, the two normalizations yield different quantizations of α. Moreover, even taking Eq. (42) as intended, the conclusion 'α=k/m Z and hence U(1) breaks to Z_m' is not correct without the gcd correction: the unbroken subgroup is Z_{m/gcd(k,m)}; for (k,m)=(4,2) it is trivial, not Z_2. With the §4.1 normalization, the correct order is also m/gcd(k,m) after restoring 2π. The 2π factors are used inconsistently between the operator definition (17), the transition (42), and the explicit connection (64). This undermines the paper's signature claim of Z_m breaking.
  3. [§3.2 and §4.1] The flat torsion-gerbe structure is imposed by hand, not derived from anomaly cancellation. The BF inflow term (26) cancels the anomaly for an arbitrary closed 2-form B̃; the flatness condition d B̃=0 and the torsion transition (42) are additional assumptions introduced in §3.2 without a justification from the anomaly mechanism. Consequently, the discrete symmetry breaking and the worldvolume flux condition are not robust consequences of gauging the M2-brane action; they are contingent on the extra topological input. The paper should explicitly frame the torsion gerbe as a hypothesis and discuss whether anomaly cancellation plus integrality actually forces it, or whether the mechanism works for any flat gerbe.
  4. [§1; §6] The paper acknowledges in §1 that bosonic p≥2 branes are quantum inconsistent (Lorentz anomalies, LCG issues) and that this is avoided by supersymmetry. Yet the entire analysis concerns the bosonic M2-brane partition function and its 't Hooft anomaly. If the computation is only formal/classical, this needs to be stated and its implications for the quantum claim addressed. The final conjecture that the mechanism extends to the supersymmetric M2-brane and implies discreteness of the spectrum depends on this unresolved step; as written, the paper studies a theory that, by its own admission, lacks a well-defined quantum path integral, which weakens the physical significance of the result.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§5, Eq. (87)] The intersection number I(N|Q) is said to be 'valued in Z[3]' but should be valued in Z; this is likely a typo.
  2. [§3.2, Eq. (33)] The replacement DX^r = dX^r - B^r by dX^r - k B^r is not motivated; the text says 'modifying (20)' but does not show how the gauge transformation of B changes. This rescaling affects the anomaly and should be explained.
  3. [§4, Eqs. (64)-(67) and (82)] The holonomy Hol_∇(Σ)=exp(2π i m/k) in (67) is a k-th root of unity, while the transition integral (82) is m/k without 2π. The relationship between the holonomy normalization and the topological-operator normalization (41) should be clarified to avoid confusion.
  4. [Abstract and §5] The abstract states that the winding operator acts on the 'transgression of the Wilson surface', while §5, Eq. (91) computes the action on the pullback Hol_∇(γ) of the gerbe connection. The terminology should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the anomaly-cancellation and symmetry-breaking derivations are self-contained, with only minor self-citations used to attach spectral significance rather than as load-bearing inputs.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. The mixed 't Hooft anomaly and its cancellation by the BF inflow term (Eqs. 22-29, Appendix A) are computed directly from the action and background-field transformations; they do not presuppose the discrete-breaking conclusion. The discrete breaking of U(1) to a finite subgroup follows from the topological-invariance condition on U_alpha(N), Eq. (41), once the flat torsion gerbe transition is specified. The torsion gerbe is explicitly an additional choice, not a consequence: Section 3.2 says 'we may consider B̃ the connection 2-form of a flat G∇c1-gerbe', and Section 4 writes the explicit connection B̃ = (m/k) dt∧dv, whose holonomy is exp(2πi m/k) by construction. Thus the symmetry-breaking result is a conditional consequence of the chosen gerbe data, not a prediction secretly identical to an input. The self-citations [4],[14],[15] are used to recall a standard isomorphism and to connect the flux condition to discreteness of the supersymmetric spectrum; they do not carry the derivation of Eq. (43). No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions. Two non-circular concerns should be flagged separately: the paper itself states that bosonic p≥2 branes are quantum inconsistent (Section 1), yet it analyzes the bosonic M2 partition function; and there is a normalization mismatch between Eq. (42), with ∫ΔB̃ = 2πm/k, and Eq. (82), with ∫ΔB̃ = m/k, so the precise order of the discrete subgroup in the latter normalization is not forced by Eq. (41) as written. These are correctness issues, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on one ad hoc background-topology input (flat torsion gerbe), a domain assumption about the twisted-torus worldvolume, the formal use of a quantum-inconsistent bosonic path integral, and standard mathematical facts about gerbe cohomology and cobordism. No continuous parameters are fitted.

axioms (6)
  • ad hoc to paper \tilde B^r is a connection of a flat G_1^{∇c}-gerbe with torsion class; local connection \tilde B = (m/k) dt∧dv.
    Introduced in §3.2 'we may consider \tilde B^r the connection 2-form of a flat G_1^{∇c}-gerbe'; it is the essential input for the Z_m breaking and is not forced by anomaly cancellation.
  • domain assumption The worldvolume Σ3 is a 3-twisted torus/mapping torus with parabolic monodromy A = [[1,k],[0,1]].
    Used in §4 to compute the classification of sections H^1(S^1,Z⊕Z_A)≅Z⊕Z_k and to build constant sections v=r/k.
  • domain assumption The bosonic Polyakov M2 path integral / partition function is well-defined for the anomaly argument.
    The paper itself states bosonic p-branes with p≥2 are quantum inconsistent (§1), but proceeds with a path-integral 't Hooft analysis; this is a formal assumption.
  • domain assumption Background B and \tilde B have integer periods on the bounding 4-manifold, B/2π∈H^1(Y4,Z), d\tilde B/2π∈H^3(Y4,Z), making the inflow term independent of D.
    Appendix B, Eq. (B.4).
  • standard math Standard classification of flat gerbes: flat classes correspond to H^2(E;U(1)) with the torsion part of H^3(E;Z); holonomy defines the topological invariant.
    §4, quoting [33],[40],[45].
  • standard math d(dX)=0 and d⋆(dX-B)=0 define the conserved higher currents; B is closed.
    Equations (13)-(14) and (30); used to build topological operators.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 18799 in / 23687 out tokens · 213546 ms · 2026-08-02T22:29:28.848547+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Higher-Form Symmetries (HFS) of a closed bosonic M2-brane formulated on a compactified target space $\mathcal{M}_9 \times T^2$ are investigated. We show that there is an obstruction to the gauging of these global symmetries in the presence of background fields, a mixed 't~Hooft anomaly. Its cancellation is obtained by the inflow term constructed in terms of gauge fields which are flat connections on a $U(1)$-principal bundle and a torsion $\mathcal{G}_1^{\nabla_c}$-gerbe on the M2-brane worldvolume. The effect of these gauge structures together with non trivial winding embedding maps ensures the breaking of the continuous HFS $U(1)$ symmetry to a discrete subgroup and a worldvolume flux condition on the M2-brane. The resulting topological operators realize discrete symmetries associated with the winding and the flux/monopole sectors, and their operator algebra is well-defined: the monopole operator acts non trivially on a vortex-dressed operator, while the winding operator acts on the transgression of the Wilson surface.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. 2-Group global symmetry in the compactified M2-brane

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    Wess–Zumino coupling of the compactified M2-brane forces its monopole 0-form and winding 1-form symmetries into a 2-group whose Postnikov class is the mixed quantized flux.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    H. A. Bethe, Zur Theorie der Metalle. i. Eigenwerte und Eigenfunktionen der linearen Atomkette , Zeit. f \"u r Phys. 71 , 205 (1931), 10.1007\

    1931

  2. [2]

    Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today

    P. Ginsparg, It was twenty years ago today... , http://arxiv.org/abs/1108.2700

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  3. [3]

    M. K. Murray, Bundle gerbes , J.\ Lond.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 54 , 403 (1996), doi:10.1112/jlms/54.2.403, http://arxiv.org/abs/dg-ga/9407015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  4. [4]

    Banks, N

    T. Banks, N. Seiberg, Symmetries and Strings in Field Theory and Gravity , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 83 , 084019 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.83.084019, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.5120

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  5. [5]

    Hatcher, Algebraic Topology , Cambridge University Press (2002), https://pi.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/AT/ATpage.html

    A. Hatcher, Algebraic Topology , Cambridge University Press (2002), https://pi.math.cornell.edu/ hatcher/AT/ATpage.html

    2002

  6. [6]

    M. P. Garc\' a del Moral, C. Las Heras, A. Restuccia, Torsion in M2-Brane Theory , Fortschr.\ Phys.\ e70061 (2025), doi:10.1002/prop.70061

    work page doi:10.1002/prop.70061 2025

  7. [7]

    H. Y. Zhang, Generalized Symmetries in Supergravities and Superconformal Field Theories via String Theory , Ph.D.\ thesis, UPenn (2023), http://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07311

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Bhardwaj, L

    L. Bhardwaj, L. E. Bottini, L. Fraser-Taliente, L. Gladden, D. S. W. Gould, A. Platschorre, H. Tillim, Lectures on generalized symmetries , Phys.\ Rept.\ 1051 , 1 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.002, http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07547

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  9. [9]

    J. J. Heckman, J. McNamara, M. Montero, A. Sharon, C. Vafa, I. Valenzuela, Fate of stringy noninvertible symmetries , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 110 , 106001 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.106001, http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00118

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Cvetic, M

    M. Cvetic, M. Dierigl, L. Lin, H. Y. Zhang, Higher-form symmetries and their anomalies in M-/F-theory duality , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 104 , 126019 (2021), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.126019, http://arxiv.org/abs/2106.07654

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Albertini, M

    F. Albertini, M. Del Zotto, I. Garc \' a Etxebarria, S. S. Hosseini, Higher Form Symmetries and M-theory , JHEP 12 , 203 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2020)203, http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12831

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Boulton, M

    L. Boulton, M. P. Garc\' a del Moral, A. Restuccia, Spectral properties in supersymmetric matrix models , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 856 , 716 (2012), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2011.11.017, http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4791

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    Martin, A

    I. Martin, A. Restuccia, R. S. Torrealba, On the stability of compactified D = 11 supermembranes , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 521 , 117 (1998), doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(98)00204-1, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9706090

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Boulton, M

    L. Boulton, M. P. Garc\' a del Moral, A. Restuccia, Discreteness of the spectrum of the compactified D = 11 supermembrane with nontrivial winding , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 671 , 343 (2003), doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2003.08.024, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0211047

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  15. [15]

    C \'o rdova, T

    C. C \'o rdova, T. T. Dumitrescu, K. Intriligator, Exploring 2-Group Global Symmetries , JHEP 02 , 184 (2019), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2019)184, http://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04790

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    M. P. Garc\' a del Moral, C. Las Heras, P. Le \'o n, J. M. Pe \ n a, A. Restuccia, M2-branes on a constant flux background , Phys.\ Lett.\ B 797 , 134924 (2019), doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134924, http://arxiv.org/abs/1811.11231

    arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    M. P. Garc\' a del Moral, C. Las Heras, P. Le \'o n, J. M. Pe \ n a, A. Restuccia, Fluxes, twisted tori, monodromy and U(1) supermembranes , JHEP 09 , 097 (2020), doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2020)097, http://arxiv.org/abs/2005.06397

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Bars, First Massive Level and Anomalies in the Supermembrane , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 308 , 462 (1988), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90573-1

    I. Bars, First Massive Level and Anomalies in the Supermembrane , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 308 , 462 (1988), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90573-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90573-1 1988

  19. [19]

    Bars, Membrane Symmetries and Anomalies , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 343 , 398 (1990), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90476-T

    I. Bars, Membrane Symmetries and Anomalies , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 343 , 398 (1990), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90476-T

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90476-t 1990

  20. [20]

    M. J. Duff, T. Inami, C. N. Pope, E. Sezgin, K. S. Stelle, Semiclassical Quantization of the Supermembrane , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 297 , 515 (1988), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90316-1

    doi:10.1016/0550-3213(88)90316-1 1988

  21. [21]

    de Wit, M

    B. de Wit, M. L \"u scher, H. Nicolai, The Supermembrane Is Unstable , Nucl.\ Phys.\ B 320 , 135 (1989), doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90214-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(89)90214-9 1989

  22. [22]

    T. Goto, Relativistic quantum mechanics of one-dimensional mechanical continuum and subsidiary condition of dual resonance model , Prog.\ Theor.\ Phys.\ 46 , 1560 (1971), doi:10.1143/PTP.46.1560

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.46.1560 1971

  23. [23]

    Gaiotto, A

    D. Gaiotto, A. Kapustin, N. Seiberg, B. Willett, Generalized Global Symmetries , JHEP 02 , 172 (2015), doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2015)172, http://arxiv.org/abs/1412.5148

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    P. R. S. Gomes, An introduction to higher-form symmetries , SciPost Phys.\ Lect.\ Notes 74 , 1 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.74, http://arxiv.org/abs/2303.01817

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries , Phys.\ Rept.\ 1063 , 1 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.007, http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18296

    S. Schafer-Nameki, ICTP lectures on (non-)invertible generalized symmetries , Phys.\ Rept.\ 1063 , 1 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.01.007, http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.18296

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  26. [26]

    Garc \' a-Valdecasas, Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity , JHEP 04 , 102 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)102, http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00777

    E. Garc \' a-Valdecasas, Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity , JHEP 04 , 102 (2023), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2023)102, http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.00777

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Karasik, On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED , SciPost Phys.\ 15 , 002 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.002, http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05802

    A. Karasik, On anomalies and gauging of U(1) non-invertible symmetries in 4d QED , SciPost Phys.\ 15 , 002 (2023), doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.1.002, http://arxiv.org/abs/2211.05802

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Y. Choi, H. T. Lam, S.-H. Shao, Noninvertible Global Symmetries in the Standard Model , Phys.\ Rev.\ Lett.\ 129 , 161601 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.161601, http://arxiv.org/abs/2205.05086

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  29. [29]

    J. J. Fernandez-Melgarejo, G. Giorgi, D. Marques, J. A. Rosabal, Noninvertible symmetries in type IIB supergravity , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 111 , 066024 (2025), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.066024, http://arxiv.org/abs/2407.09402

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Armas, A

    J. Armas, A. Jain, Approximate higher-form symmetries, topological defects, and dynamical phase transitions , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 109 , 045019 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.045019, http://arxiv.org/abs/2301.09628

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Hasan, S

    A. Hasan, S. Meynet, D. Migliorati, SL _2( R ) symmetries of SymTFT and non-invertible U(1) symmetries of Maxwell theory , JHEP 12 , 131 (2024), doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2024)131, http://arxiv.org/abs/2405.19218

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Restuccia, J

    A. Restuccia, J. Stephany, BF models, duality and bosonization in higher genus surfaces , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 61 , 085010 (2000), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.61.085010, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9805075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  33. [33]

    C. Hull, M. L. Hutt, U. Lindstr \"o m, Generalised symmetries in linear gravity , JHEP 04 , 046 (2025), doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2025)046, http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.00178

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Luo, Q.-R

    R. Luo, Q.-R. Wang, Y.-N. Wang, Lecture notes on generalized symmetries and applications , Phys.\ Rept.\ 1065 , 1 (2024), doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2024.02.002, http://arxiv.org/abs/2307.09215

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Brylinski, Loop spaces, characteristic classes and geometric quantization , (1993)

    J.-L. Brylinski, Loop spaces, characteristic classes and geometric quantization , (1993)

    1993

  36. [36]

    Marquard, R

    U. Marquard, R. Kaiser, M. Scholl, Lorentz Algebra and Critical Dimension for the Supermembrane , Phys.\ Lett.\ B 227 , 234 (1989), doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(89)80028-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(89)80028-0 1989

  37. [37]

    A. M. Polyakov, Quantum Geometry of Bosonic Strings , Phys.\ Lett.\ B 103 , 207 (1981), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90743-7

    doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90743-7 1981

  38. [38]

    Bergshoeff, E

    E. Bergshoeff, E. Sezgin, P. K. Townsend, Supermembranes and Eleven-Dimensional Supergravity , Phys.\ Lett.\ B 189 , 75 (1987), doi:10.1201/9781482268737-10

    work page doi:10.1201/9781482268737-10 1987

  39. [39]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, L. Susskind, M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 55 , 5112 (1997), doi:10.1201/9781482268737-37, http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9610043

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  40. [40]

    Chatzistavrakidis, G

    A. Chatzistavrakidis, G. Karagiannis, A. Ranjbar, Duality, Generalized Global Symmetries and Jet Space Isometries , Universe 8 , 10 (2021), doi:10.3390/universe8010010, http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00441

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    T. D. Brennan, C. C \'o rdova, T. T. Dumitrescu, Line Defect Quantum Numbers & Anomalies , http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.15401 (2022)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    M. K. Murray, D. Stevenson, Bundle gerbes: Stable isomorphism and local theory , J.\ Lond.\ Math.\ Soc.\ 62 , 925 (2000), doi:10.1112/S0024610700001551, http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9908135

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  43. [43]

    J. C. Baez, J. Huerta, An Invitation to Higher Gauge Theory , Gen.\ Rel.\ Grav.\ 43 , 2335 (2011), doi:10.1007/s10714-010-1070-9, http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4485

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  44. [44]

    Montero, A

    M. Montero, A. M. Uranga, I. Valenzuela, A Chern-Simons Pandemic , JHEP 07 , 123 (2017), doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2017)123, http://arxiv.org/abs/1702.06147

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  45. [45]

    Cveti c , J

    M. Cveti c , J. J. Heckman, M. H \"u bner, E. Torres, Fluxbranes, generalized symmetries, and Verlinde s metastable monopole , Phys.\ Rev.\ D 109 , 046007 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.046007, http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.09665

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Kapustin, Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology , http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1467 (2014)

    A. Kapustin, Symmetry Protected Topological Phases, Anomalies, and Cobordisms: Beyond Group Cohomology , http://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1467 (2014)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  47. [47]

    Johnson, Constructions with bundle gerbes , M.Sc.\ thesis (2002), http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0312175

    S. Johnson, Constructions with bundle gerbes , M.Sc.\ thesis (2002), http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0312175

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  48. [48]

    Martin, A

    I. Martin, A. Restuccia, Duality symmetric actions and canonical quantization , Phys.\ Lett.\ B 323 , 311 (1994), doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)91225-4

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(94)91225-4 1994