REVIEW 1 cited by
Ghost-free non-local $F(R)$ Gravity Cosmology
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
In this work we shall study ghost-free non-local $F(R)$ gravity models. Firstly we shall demonstrate how the ghost degrees of freedom may occur in the non-local $F(R)$ gravity models, and accordingly we shall modify appropriately the gravitational action of non-local $F(R)$ gravity models in order to eliminate the ghosts. Also we shall investigate how the (anti-)de Sitter and the Minkowski spacetime cosmological solutions may arise in the theory, and we investigate when these solutions are stable. Moreover, we shall examine the inflationary phenomenology of the Jordan frame ghost-free non-local $F(R)$ gravity. We shall study two $F(R)$ gravity models, the power law $F(R)$ gravity model $\sim R^n$ with $1<n<2$, $n\neq 2$ and the $R^2$ model, assuming that the slow-roll condition holds true for the Hubble rate during the inflationary era $\dot{H}\ll H^2$ and that the general constant-roll condition $\ddot{\phi}=3\beta H\dot{\phi}$ holds true for the evolution of the scalar field, which includes the slow-roll case for $\beta=0$. As we shall demonstrate, the power-law non-local $F(R)$ gravity case can produce a viable inflationary era, compatible with observations, in the constant-roll case, unlike for the $R^2$ model. It is conceivable that the results are model dependent, as in the ordinary vacuum $F(R)$ gravity.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Non-locality in Quadrupolar Gravitational Radiation
For the nonlocal action R + aR□^{-1}R, the quadrupole GW luminosity becomes (G/5c^5)[(1 + a/(3(6a-1)))⟨Q⃛_ij Q⃛_ij⟩ + ((1+7a)/(3(6a-1)))⟨Q⃛²⟩], with the claimed scalar-mode detectability resting on an invalid near-div...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.