Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Transient growth and nonlinear breakdown of wavelet-based resolvent modes in turbulent channel flow

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Injected linear mode briefly drives near-wall streaks in turbulent channel flow.

desk verdict Careful forced-DNS test of wavelet resolvent modes shows early linear agreement then nonlinear decay; frozen-mean caveat is real but not fatal. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08670 v3 pith:FBCSN572 submitted 2025-02-12 physics.flu-dyn

Eric Ballouz , Scott T. M. Dawson , H. Jane Bae This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords resolventanalysiswavelettransformturbulentchannelflownear-wallstreakstransientgrowthnonlinearenergytransferminimalunitcontrol
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether a resolvent forcing mode computed from the linearized Navier-Stokes equations, localized in time as a wavelet pulse, can actually actuate the near-wall cycle of a fully turbulent channel. The answer is a qualified yes: when injected into a minimal flow unit at $Re_\tau\approx 186$, the principal mode (streamwise rolls) drives streamwise streaks that grow and then decay, and the DNS tracks the optimal linear response mode at early times and near the wall. Nonlinearity cuts that growth short, stronger forcing causes faster decay, and the linear mode overpredicts the achievable amplification. The paper then identifies the breakdown mechanism: energy is transferred from the forced streak to a spanwise-doubled mode near the wall and a streamwise-modulated mode in the outer region, dominated by spanwise self-advection. If this is right, linear resolvent modes remain cheap and useful as actuators for control-oriented prediction, but only with a built-in nonlinearity penalty.

What carries the argument

The central object is the windowed wavelet-based resolvent operator $\tilde{H}^{(0,1)} B$, where $\tilde{H}$ is the discrete linearized Navier-Stokes operator in a wavelet-in-time basis and $B$ is a windowing matrix that restricts the forcing to a compact Daubechies-8 scaling-function pulse at a chosen scale and shift. An SVD of this combined operator yields the optimal forcing mode (streamwise rolls) and the corresponding transient response mode (streamwise streaks), ordered by time-integrated kinetic-energy amplification. The second half of the machinery is the scale-to-scale energy-transfer diagnostic $\hat{T}^{(0,1)}_{(p_1,p_3)}$, which decomposes nonlinear transfer from the actuated mode by interacting wavenumbers and by advection direction; this diagnostic localizes the $(0,2)$ and $(1,1)$ sinks and identifies spanwise self-advection as the dominant pathway.

What would settle it

Run the same forced DNS with the mean-fixing body force removed at $\varepsilon = 10\%$; if the DNS still tracks the linear response mode up to $t\approx 0.7\,h/u_\tau$ and the peak streak energy still scales sub-quadratically, the frozen-mean assumption is not biasing the comparison, but if the deviation begins earlier or the peak shifts significantly, the paper's attribution of the premature decay to nonlinearity is called into question.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the time-localized principal resolvent forcing mode, obtained from an SVD of the windowed wavelet-based resolvent operator, is an effective but imperfect actuator for the buffer-layer streak cycle. In the minimal flow unit at $Re_\tau\approx 186$, forcing that mode at intensities $\varepsilon = 1\%$ to $10\%$ of the unforced nonlinearity produces the expected rolls-to-streaks lift-up growth, and the instantaneous streamwise velocity deviation collapses onto the linear response mode for $t \lesssim 0.7\,h/u_\tau$ and $y^+ \lesssim 15$. Beyond that, the response decays prematurely in all cases, with peak streak energy scaling sub-quadratically and decay time scaling as $\varepsilon^{-0.65}$. The principal mode still outperforms the first suboptimal mode and a random forcing structure at amplifying near-wall streaks, though the effective amplification gap is small. The paper also claims that the nonlinear breakdown follows a fixed spatial template: spanwise self-advection feeds a $(0,2)$ mode in the near-wall region and a $(1,1)$ mode in the outer region, and resolvent modes of those secondary scales sit exactly at the foci of energy transfer.

Load-bearing premise

The whole comparison assumes the mean streamwise profile stays exactly as in the unforced flow, enforced by an artificial body force, so the resolvent mode remains optimal for the base flow the DNS actually sees.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resolvent-based control designs must discount linear amplification by an intensity-dependent factor, because the DNS amplification coefficient $\sigma_{eff}$ is always below $\sigma_1 = 11.54$ and decreases with forcing strength.
  • Streak breakdown is wavenumber-selective: actuating the $(0,1)$ mode feeds the $(0,2)$ mode near the wall and the $(1,1)$ mode in the outer layer, so control aimed at sustaining streaks should target those two secondary modes.
  • The dominance of spanwise self-advection in the nonlinear energy transfer implies that reducing spanwise gradients of the actuated streak, rather than streamwise or wall-normal coupling, is the likeliest way to prolong transient growth.
  • The early collapse of the DNS onto the linear response mode, lasting roughly an eddy turnover time near the wall, supports using the wavelet-resolvent mode as a short-horizon predictor of actuation effects in wall-bounded turbulence.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One editorial extension: the same wavelet-resolvent construction could be applied to streak modes of different spanwise wavelengths to test whether linear amplification or nonlinear transfer controls streak spacing in larger channels.
  • The paper's frozen-mean setting is its most delicate assumption; an unfixed-mean experiment at $\varepsilon = 10\%$ would cleanly check whether the early-time agreement is an artifact of holding the base flow constant.
  • A practical control corollary left implicit is that there is a sweet spot in forcing intensity: too weak actuation wastes the mode's efficiency, while too strong trips the fast spanwise-advection decay, so an intermediate $\varepsilon$ should maximize time-integrated streak energy.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper tests whether time-localised wavelet-based resolvent forcing modes, which are optimal for the linearised Navier-Stokes operator about a frozen mean profile, can transiently actuate near-wall streaks in a fully nonlinear minimal channel at Re_tau=186. Modes are computed by SVD of a windowed wavelet resolvent operator for the (k_x,k_z)=(0,1) Fourier mode, injected into an ensemble of forced DNS at amplitudes epsilon=1,2,5,10%, and compared with the optimal linear response mode. The authors report that the DNS tracks the optimal linear response at early times and near the wall, that nonlinearity causes premature decay with faster decay for stronger forcing, that the principal forcing mode outperforms random and second-suboptimal forcing, and that spanwise self-advection transfers energy to the (0,2) and (1,1) modes in the near-wall and outer regions. The manuscript also contains a quasi-linear model of the nonlinear energy transfer and resolvent analysis of the secondary modes.

Significance. If the central claims survive revision, the work provides a notable demonstration that transient resolvent modes can act as meaningful actuation structures in nonlinear turbulence and quantifies how nonlinearity clips linear optimal growth. The experimental design is careful in several respects: large ensembles (1000-4000), phase alignment via Eq. (2.10), modified wavenumbers matched to the DNS grid, and conservative comparisons against random and suboptimal forcing. The nonlinear energy transfer analysis and the quasi-linear model are valuable additions. The main caveat is that the frozen-mean constraint is load-bearing and the unfixed-mean check is asserted but not shown; this currently limits confidence in the claim that the DNS response tracks the linear response mode.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.4 (Eq. 2.11) and §3.3] The artificial body force F that pins the mean streamwise profile to U1(y) is load-bearing for the central early-time agreement claim. The resolvent modes are optimal about this same frozen base flow, and both forced and unforced runs remove the (0,0) contribution of the right-hand side, so the comparison in Figs. 5-6 is between a constrained DNS and a linear operator defined about the same constrained base state. The authors acknowledge this and state in §3.3 that an unfixed-mean run for epsilon=5% gives a streak energy profile 'indeed very close' to Fig. 3(a), but no data, figure, or quantitative comparison is provided. Because allowing the mean to evolve would change the instantaneous linear operator and could reduce the alignment with the injected mode, the missing check directly affects the interpretation of the headline result. Please provide the unfixed-mean results (e.g., streak energy curve, peak and decay times, and the deviation from the linear response mode) or explicitly restrict the conclusions to the frozen-mean system.
  2. [§3.1 (Fig. 3b,d)] The scaling laws dE_hat_1 ~ |epsilon|^1.44 and dt_decay ~ |epsilon|^{-0.65} are presented as quantitative results but are fitted to only four forcing amplitudes with no uncertainty estimates, goodness-of-fit measures, or statement of the fit procedure. Since these exponents are used in the narrative that nonlinearities curtail linear growth and that stronger forcing accelerates decay, either provide confidence intervals and residual information or present these trends as qualitative descriptions of the four computed cases.
  3. [§3.3 (Fig. 7)] The abstract's claim that the principal forcing mode is 'more effective' than the second suboptimal mode rests on the observation that sigma_eff for phi1 exceeds that for phi3 by only a factor of 1.03, while the corresponding linear ratio sigma1/sigma3 is 2.16. No confidence interval is given for this 3% difference. Given that the ensemble sizes vary between 1000 and 4000 and that the earlier convergence check (§2.4) was reported for streak energy rather than for sigma_eff, please provide a statistical uncertainty estimate (e.g., bootstrap across initial conditions) for the effective amplification ratio to support the ordering claim.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.4, text after Eq. (2.9)] The sentence 'such that the resolvent forcing mode is increasing the initial energy of the right-hand side by epsilon%' is grammatically unclear; 'increasing' should be 'increases' and the sentence should be rephrased.
  2. [§3.3, last paragraph] The sentence 'very close to the what is shown in figure 3(a)' contains a typo ('the what'); please correct it and, more importantly, reference a figure or table for the unfixed-mean result.
  3. [Figure 9 caption] The caption states 'epsilon≈5%' for the purple case, whereas all other cases use exact percentages; please state the exact value or explain the approximation.
  4. [§4.1, first paragraph] The sentence 'The energy content of the secondary modes (figures 8, 9) are the result of nonlinear interactions' has a subject-verb disagreement; 'are' should be 'is'.
  5. [§2.4, random forcing] The random forcing mode phi_rand is not fully specified; please state how the random spatial field is sampled (e.g., Gaussian, wall-normal support) and how its normalization is performed, to enable reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DNS injection is an external test of the resolvent modes, with no fitted parameters; the frozen-mean constraint is a stated assumption and the missing unfixed-mean check is a transparency limitation, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: (i) compute a turbulent mean profile U1 from unforced DNS; (ii) build a wavelet-based resolvent operator about U1, take its SVD, and obtain optimal forcing and response modes; (iii) inject the principal forcing mode into a fully nonlinear DNS, artificially freezing the mean profile via the body force F=(F1,0,0) in Eq. (2.11); (iv) compare the DNS velocity deviation Δ with the linear resolvent response σ1ψ1. The central claim—that the DNS initially tracks the linear response and then decays prematurely due to nonlinearity—is an external test rather than a constructed equivalence. No parameter of the DNS is fitted to force agreement; the linear response is computed from the linearised operator, while the DNS evolves the full nonlinear equations with turbulent initial conditions. The early-time agreement is a nontrivial quantitative result, and the paper explicitly reports the overprediction and nonlinear breakdown. The self-citations to Ballouz et al. for the wavelet-resolvent formulation are normal references to prior published methodology, not load-bearing appeals to a uniqueness theorem; the framework is used as a tool, not as evidence for the DNS outcome. The main caveat is that the frozen-mean forcing F in Eq. (2.11) keeps the base flow artificially fixed to the resolvent's base profile, so the early-time comparison could be favourably biased. The authors acknowledge this in §3.3: 'allowing the mean profile to vary may reduce the effectiveness of the forcing mode', and they assert an unfixed-mean check: 'Though not shown, the streak energy profile obtained for ε=5% and an unfixed mean velocity is indeed very close to the what is shown in figure 3(a)'. This check is not displayed or quantified, which weakens the support for the frozen-mean assumption. However, this is a limitation or missing-support issue, not a circularity: the DNS is still a genuinely nonlinear, independent simulation, and the linear response is not obtained from the DNS data. Overall, the derivation is self-contained against an external benchmark, and the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest primarily on the standard resolvent-analysis assumption, the self-cited wavelet framework, and the artificial frozen-mean setup. No new physical entities are introduced. The only fitted numbers are descriptive scaling exponents for the streak energy trends, not inputs to the main mechanism analysis.

free parameters (2)
  • Peak streak energy scaling exponent = 1.44
    Fitted to the peak streak energy deviation vs forcing amplitude in figure 3(b) across four amplitudes; describes sub-quadratic scaling due to nonlinearity.
  • Decay time scaling exponent = -0.65
    Fitted to the decay time from peak to 10% of peak vs forcing amplitude in figure 3(d); descriptive trend, not used to reach the central claim.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The linearised Navier-Stokes equations about the mean turbulent profile capture the dominant amplification mechanism for the targeted (0,1) mode.
    Used to construct the resolvent operator in Section 2.2; a standard assumption in resolvent analysis, supported by prior work (Bae et al. 2021) but not proven here.
  • standard math The wavelet-based resolvent formulation of Ballouz et al. (2024b) correctly extends resolvent analysis to transient trajectories.
    The entire mode computation in Section 2.2 relies on this self-cited framework; assumed correct as published.
  • domain assumption A single-level Daubechies-8 wavelet/scaling-function pair is sufficient to represent the time-localized forcing and response.
    Chosen in Section 2.2 without a systematic comparison of alternative wavelets or transform levels.
  • ad hoc to paper Freezing the mean profile with the artificial forcing F does not qualitatively change the (0,1)-mode dynamics.
    Introduced in Section 2.4 and used for all forced runs; the paper asserts in Section 3.3 that an unfixed-mean case is nearly identical, but this result is not shown.
  • domain assumption The minimal flow unit at Re_tau=186 with wavenumbers (0,1) is representative of the near-wall self-sustaining cycle.
    Justified in Section 2.3 by the single streak in the minimal unit and by spectral energy content cited from Bae et al. (2021); not re-tested here.
  • standard math The scale-to-scale nonlinear energy transfer term (4.4), taken from Symon et al. (2021) and Ding et al. (2025), correctly isolates mode-to-mode energy exchange.
    The paper re-derives conservation properties in Section 4, but the diagnostic itself is imported from the cited works.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Transient growth and nonlinear breakdown of wavelet-based resolvent modes in turbulent channel flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FBCSN572

@misc{pith2026250208670,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Transient growth and nonlinear breakdown of wavelet-based resolvent modes in turbulent channel flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FBCSN572}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08670}
}
read the original abstract

We study the effectiveness of the time-localised principal resolvent forcing mode at actuating the near wall cycle of turbulence. The mode is restricted to a wavelet pulse and computed from an SVD of the windowed wavelet-based resolvent operator so that it produces the largest amplification via the linearised Navier-Stokes equations. We then inject this time-localised mode into the turbulent minimal flow unit at different intensities, and measure the instantaneous deviation of the system's response from the optimal resolvent response mode. This is possible under the new formulation, which enables the modes to represent transient trajectories. For the most energetic spatial wave numbers in the minimal flow unit -- constant in the streamwise direction and once-periodic in the spanwise direction -- the forcing mode takes the shape of streamwise rolls and produces a response mode in the form of streamwise streaks that transiently grow and decay. For initial times and close to the wall, the DNS response matches the principal response mode well, but due to nonlinearities, the response across all forcing intensities decays prematurely, and a higher forcing intensity leads to faster energy decay. The principal forcing mode still leads to significant energy amplification and is more effective than a randomly-generated forcing structure and the second suboptimal resolvent forcing mode at amplifying the near-wall streaks. We compute the nonlinear energy transfer to secondary modes and observe that the breakdown of the actuated mode proceeds similarly across all forcing intensities: in the near-wall region, the induced streak forks into a structure twice periodic in the spanwise direction; in the outer region, the streak breaks up into a structure that is once periodic in the streamwise direction. In both regions, spanwise gradients account for the dominant share of nonlinear energy transfer.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08670 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Daubechies-8 scaling function in time (a) and frequency (b) domain. and high-speed streak pair in the spanwise direction. We thus choose to target the Fourier mode given by the streamwise and spanwise wavenumbers of 1 = 0 and 3 = 1, respectively. These length scales also correspond to a peak in the spectral energy content for the minimal flow unit (Bae et al. 2021). Traditional resolvent analysis in which the Navier… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Magnitudes of the wall-normal component of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) Average streak energy as a function of time; the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (17 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Effective amplification eff (solid) and 1 (dashed). (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Average deviation in the streamwise velocity of th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Average deviation in the streamwise velocity of th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average streak energy for cases forced by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Integrated streamwise spectral energy content [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Streamwise spectral energy content at (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: (a) Integrated nonlinear energy transfer from th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Nonlinear energy transfer Δˆ (0,1) (1, 3) for = 2% (a-c) and = 10% (d-f), at / = 0.35 (a, d), 0.74 (b, e), 2 (c, f). 4.1. Interacting modes [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: (a) Integrated nonlinear energy transfer from th [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a) Total nonlinear energy transfer from the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: (a, b) Δˆ (0,1) (0, 2)/ 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Ensemble-averaged streamwise velocity deviati [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Nonlinear energy transfer from the (0, 1)–mode to unforced modes, broken down by streamwise (blue −•), wall-normal (green −N) and spanwise (red −) contributions. The cases plotted are (a, c) = 2% and (b, d) = 10%. Plots (a) and (b) represent the contributions to the …
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Nonlinear energy transfer from the (0, 1)–mode split by NLT2 and NLT3 contributions: (a, b) Δˆ (0,1) 2 / 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Quasi-linear approximation e(0,1) for the nonlinear energy transfer from the (0, 1)–mode, normalised by the forcing magnitude || 2 . Figures (a) and (b) correspond to the transfer to the (0, 2)–mode, and figures (c) and (d) correspond to the transfer to the (1, 1)–mod…
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Nonlinear energy transport from the (0, 1)–mode to the (a, b) (0, 2)–mode and the (c, d) (1, 1)–mode, broken down by streamwise (blue −•), wall-normal (green −N) and spanwise (red −) contributions, and normalised by forcing magnitude. The solid lines correspond to th…
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Magnitude of the streamwise component of the prin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_20.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Extracting dominant dynamics about unsteady base flows

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-05 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A perspective review of methods for extracting perturbation dynamics about time-varying base flows, identifying unresolved challenges in defining the base flow and extending operator-based analyses to aperiodic flows.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 'mid.sentence ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in capitalize " " * FUNCT...

  3. [3]

    Adrian, R. J. 2007 Hairpin vortex organization in wall turbulence . Phys. Fluids 19 (4)

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Bae, H. J. , Lozano-Dur \'a n, A. , Bose, S. T. & Moin, P. 2019 Dynamic slip wall model for large-eddy simulation . J. Fluid Mech. 859 , 400--432

    2019

  5. [5]

    Bae, H. J. , Lozano-Durán, A. , Bose, S. T. & Moin, P. 2018 Turbulence intensities in large-eddy simulation of wall-bounded flows . Phys. Rev. Fluids 3 (1), 014610

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Bae, H. J. , Lozano-Durán, A. & McKeon, B. J. 2021 Nonlinear mechanism of the self-sustaining process in the buffer and logarithmic layer of wall-bounded flows . J. Fluid Mech. 914 , A3

    work page 2021

  7. [7]

    Bakewell Jr., H. P. & Lumley, J. L. 1967 Viscous sublayer and adjacent wall region in turbulent pipe flow . Phys. Fluids 10 (9), 1880--1889

    work page 1967

  8. [8]

    , Dawson, S

    Ballouz, E. , Dawson, S. T. M. & Bae, H. J. 2024 a\/ Transient growth of wavelet-based resolvent modes in the buffer layer of wall-bounded turbulence. In J. Phys.: Conference Series\/ , , vol. 2753 , p. 012002 . IOP Publishing

    work page 2024

Show all 69 references
  1. [9]

    , Lopez-Doriga, B

    Ballouz, E. , Lopez-Doriga, B. , Dawson, S. T. & Bae, H. J. 2023 Wavelet-based resolvent analysis for statistically-stationary and temporally-evolving flows. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum\/ , p. 0676

    2023

  2. [10]

    , Lopez-Doriga, B

    Ballouz, E. , Lopez-Doriga, B. , Dawson, S. T. M. & Bae, H. J. 2024 b\/ Wavelet-based resolvent analysis of non-stationary flows . J. Fluid Mech. 999 , A53

    2024

  3. [11]

    Blackwelder, R. F. & Eckelmann, H. 1979 Streamwise vortices associated with the bursting phenomenon . J. Fluid Mech. 94 (3), 577--594

    1979

  4. [12]

    Butler, K. M. & Farrell, B. F. 1993 Optimal perturbations and streak spacing in wall-bounded turbulent shear flow . Phys. Fluids A 5 (3), 774--777

    1993

  5. [13]

    Chernyshenko, S. I. & Baig, M. F. 2005 The mechanism of streak formation in near-wall turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 544 , 99--131

    2005

  6. [14]

    , Hwang, Y

    Cho, M. , Hwang, Y. & Choi, H. 2018 Scale interactions and spectral energy transfer in turbulent channel flow . J. Fluid Mech. 854 , 474--504

    2018

  7. [15]

    1992 Ten lectures on wavelets\/

    Daubechies, I. 1992 Ten lectures on wavelets\/ . SIAM

    1992

  8. [16]

    Del Alamo, J. C. & Jiménez, J. 2006 Linear energy amplification in turbulent channels . J. Fluid Mech. 559 , 205--213

    2006

  9. [17]

    Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1002 , A42

    Ding, Jitong , Chung, Daniel & Illingworth, Simon J 2025 Mode-to-mode nonlinear energy transfer in turbulent channel flows . Journal of Fluid Mechanics 1002 , A42

    2025

  10. [18]

    , Lenz, E

    Elnahhas, A. , Lenz, E. , Moin, P. , Lozano-Dur \'a n, A. & Bae, H. J. 2024 Are the dynamics of wall turbulence in minimal channels and larger domain channels equivalent ? A graph-theoretic approach . J. Phys.:Conf. Ser. 2753 , 012004

    2024

  11. [19]

    Encinar, M. P. & Jim \'e nez, J. 2020 Momentum transfer by linearised eddies in turbulent channel flows . J. Fluid Mech. 895 , A23

    2020

  12. [20]

    Farrell, B. F. , Gayme, D. F. & Ioannou, P. J. 2017 A statistical state dynamics approach to wall turbulence . Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375 (2089), 20160081

    2017

  13. [21]

    Gayme, D. F. & Minnick, B. A. 2019 Coherent structure-based approach to modeling wall turbulence . Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (11), 110505

    2019

  14. [22]

    Hamilton, J. M. , Kim, J. & Waleffe, F. 1995 Regeneration mechanisms of near-wall turbulence structures . J. Fluid Mech. 287 , 317--348

    1995

  15. [23]

    Heide, A. L. & Hemati, M. S. 2023 An optimization framework for analyzing nonlinear stability due to sparse finite-amplitude perturbations. In AIAA AVIATION 2023 Forum\/ , p. 4258

    2023

  16. [24]

    , Toedtli, S

    Huang, Y. , Toedtli, S. S. , Chini, G. P. & McKeon, B. J. 2023 Spatio-temporal characterization of non-linear forcing in turbulence . arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00095

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    & Cossu, C

    Hwang, Y. & Cossu, C. 2010 Self-sustained process at large scales in turbulent channel flow . Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (4), 044505

    2010

  18. [26]

    , Nichols, J

    Jeun, J. , Nichols, J. W. & Jovanovi \'c , M. R. 2016 Input-output analysis of high-speed axisymmetric isothermal jet noise . Phys. Fluids 28 (4), 047101

    2016

  19. [27]

    2013 How linear is wall-bounded turbulence? Phys

    Jim \'e nez, J. 2013 How linear is wall-bounded turbulence? Phys. Fluids 25 (11)

    2013

  20. [28]

    2018 Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence

    Jim \'e nez, J. 2018 Coherent structures in wall-bounded turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 842 , P1

    2018

  21. [29]

    & Moin, P

    Jim \'e nez, J. & Moin, P. 1991 The minimal flow unit in near-wall turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 225 , 213--240

    1991

  22. [30]

    Johansson, A. V. , Her, J.-Y. & Haritonidis, J. H 1987 On the generation of high-amplitude wall-pressure peaks in turbulent boundary layers and spots . J. Fluid Mech. 175 , 119--142

    1987

  23. [31]

    Kerswell, R. R. 2018 Nonlinear nonmodal stability theory . Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 50 (1), 319--345

    2018

  24. [32]

    Kim, H. T. , Kline, S. J. & Reynolds, W. C. 1971 The production of turbulence near a smooth wall in a turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 50 (1), 133--160

    1971

  25. [33]

    & Moin, P

    Kim, J. & Moin, P. 1985 Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible N avier- S tokes equations . J. Comput. Phys. 59 (2), 308--323

    1985

  26. [34]

    Klebanoff, P. S. , Tidstrom, K. D. & Sargent, L. M. 1962 The three-dimensional nature of boundary-layer instability . J. Fluid Mech. 12 (1), 1--34

    1962

  27. [35]

    Kline, S. J. , Reynolds, W. C. , Schraub, F. A. & Runstadler, P. W. 1967 The structure of turbulent boundary layers . J. Fluid Mech. 30 (4), 741--773

    1967

  28. [36]

    , Yeh, C

    Kojima, Y. , Yeh, C. , Taira, K. & Kameda, M. 2020 Resolvent analysis on the origin of two-dimensional transonic buffet . J. Fluid Mech. 885 , R1

    2020

  29. [37]

    Landahl, M. T. 1980 A note on an algebraic instability of inviscid parallel shear flows . J. Fluid Mech. 98 (2), 243--251

    1980

  30. [38]

    , Tsai, M.-L

    Lin, C.-T. , Tsai, M.-L. & Tsai, H.-C. 2023 Flow control of a plunging cylinder based on resolvent analysis . J. of Fluid Mech. 967 , A41

    2023

  31. [39]

    , Sun, Y

    Liu, Q. , Sun, Y. , Yeh, C.-A. , Ukeiley, L. S. , Cattafesta III, L. N. & Taira, K. 2021 Unsteady control of supersonic turbulent cavity flow based on resolvent analysis . J. Fluid Mech. 925 , A5

    2021

  32. [40]

    , Ballouz, E

    L\'opez-Doriga, B. , Ballouz, E. , Bae, H. J. & Dawson, S. T. M. 2023 A sparsity-promoting resolvent analysis for the identification of spatiotemporally-localized amplification mechanisms. In AIAA SCITECH 2023 Forum\/ , p. 0677

    2023

  33. [41]

    , Ballouz, E

    L\'opez-Doriga, B. , Ballouz, E. , Bae, H. J. & Dawson, S. T. M. 2024 Sparse space–time resolvent analysis for statistically stationary and time-varying flows . J. Fluid Mech. 999 , A87

    2024

  34. [42]

    & Bae, H

    Lozano-Dur \'a n, A. & Bae, H. J. 2016 Turbulent channel with slip boundaries as a benchmark for subgrid-scale models in les . Annual Research Briefs. Center for Turbulence Research 2016 , 97--103

    2016

  35. [43]

    , Constantinou, N

    Lozano-Dur \'a n, A. , Constantinou, N. C. , Nikolaidis, M.-A. & Karp, M. 2021 Cause-and-effect of linear mechanisms sustaining wall turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 914 , A8

    2021

  36. [44]

    1999 A wavelet tour of signal processing\/

    Mallat, S. 1999 A wavelet tour of signal processing\/ . Elsevier

    1999

  37. [45]

    Markeviciute, V. K. & Kerswell, R. R. 2024 Threshold transient growth as a criterion for turbulent mean profiles . J. Fluid Mech. 996 , A32

    2024

  38. [46]

    McKeon, B. J. 2017 The engine behind (wall) turbulence: perspectives on scale interactions . J. Fluid Mech. 817 , P1

    2017

  39. [47]

    McKeon, B. J. & Sharma, A. S. 2010 A critical-layer framework for turbulent pipe flow . J. Fluid Mech. 658 , 336--382

    2010

  40. [48]

    , Sharma, A

    Moarref, R. , Sharma, A. S. , Tropp, J. A. & McKeon, B. J. 2013 Model-based scaling of the streamwise energy density in high- R eynolds-number turbulent channels . J. Fluid Mech. 734 , 275--316

    2013

  41. [49]

    , Nogueira, P

    Morra, P. , Nogueira, P. A. S. , Cavalieri, A. V. G. & Henningson, D. S. 2021 The colour of forcing statistics in resolvent analyses of turbulent channel flows . J. Fluid Mech. 907 , A24

    2021

  42. [50]

    , Semeraro, O

    Morra, P. , Semeraro, O. , Henningson, D. S. & Cossu, C. 2019 On the relevance of R eynolds stresses in resolvent analyses of turbulent wall-bounded flows . J. Fluid Mech. 867 , 969--984

    2019

  43. [51]

    2012 Wavelets: A concise guide\/

    Najmi, A.-H. 2012 Wavelets: A concise guide\/ . JHU Press

    2012

  44. [52]

    2000 Fluid flow phenomena: a numerical toolkit

    Orlandi, P. 2000 Fluid flow phenomena: a numerical toolkit . Springer Science & Business Media 55

    2000

  45. [53]

    Orr, W. M. F. 1907 The stability or instability of the steady motions of a perfect liquid and of a viscous liquid. P art II : A viscous liquid 27 , 69--138

    1907

  46. [54]

    Panton, R. L. 2001 Overview of the self-sustaining mechanisms of wall turbulence . Prog. Aerosp. Sci. 37 (4), 341--383

    2001

  47. [55]

    2000 Turbulent flows\/

    Pope, S.B. 2000 Turbulent flows\/ . Cambridge University Press

    2000

  48. [56]

    , Garc \' a-Villalba, M

    Pujals, G. , Garc \' a-Villalba, M. , Cossu, C. & Depardon, S. 2009 A note on optimal transient growth in turbulent channel flows . Phys. Fluids 21 (1), 015109

    2009

  49. [57]

    Robinson, S. K. 1991 Coherent motions in the turbulent boundary layer . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23 (1), 601--639

    1991

  50. [58]

    Schmid, P. J. , Henningson, D. S. & Jankowski, D. F. 2002 Stability and transition in shear flows. applied mathematical sciences, vol. 142 . Appl. Mech. Rev. 55 (3), B57--B59

    2002

  51. [59]

    Smith, C. R. & Metzler, S. P. 1983 The characteristics of low-speed streaks in the near-wall region of a turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 129 , 27--54

    1983

  52. [60]

    Smits, A. J. , McKeon, B. J. & Marusic, I. 2011 High-- R eynolds number wall turbulence . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 43 , 353--375

    2011

  53. [61]

    , Illingworth, S

    Symon, S. , Illingworth, S. J. & Marusic, I. 2021 Energy transfer in turbulent channel flows and implications for resolvent modelling . J. Fluid Mech. 911 , A3

    2021

  54. [62]

    , Madhusudanan, A

    Symon, S. , Madhusudanan, A. , Illingworth, S. J. & Marusic, I. 2023 Use of eddy viscosity in resolvent analysis of turbulent channel flow . Phys. Rev. Fluids 8 (6), 064601

    2023

  55. [63]

    & Lumley, J

    Tennekes, H. & Lumley, J. L. 1972 A first course in turbulence\/ . MIT press

    1972

  56. [64]

    Thomas, V. L. , Lieu, B. K. , Jovanovi \'c , M. R. , Farrell, B. F. , Ioannou, P. J. & Gayme, D. F. 2014 Self-sustaining turbulence in a restricted nonlinear model of plane C ouette flow . Phys. Fluids 26 (10)

    2014

  57. [65]

    Toedtli, S. S. , Luhar, M. & McKeon, B. J. 2019 Predicting the response of turbulent channel flow to varying-phase opposition control: resolvent analysis as a tool for flow control design . Phys. Rev. Fluids 4 (7), 073905

    2019

  58. [66]

    1997 On a self-sustaining process in shear flows

    Waleffe, F. 1997 On a self-sustaining process in shear flows . Phys. Fluids 9 (4), 883--900

    1997

  59. [67]

    Wray, A. A. 1990 Minimal storage time advancement schemes for spectral methods . NASA Ames Research Center, California, Report No. MS 202

    1990

  60. [68]

    & Taira, K

    Yeh, C.-A. & Taira, K. 2019 Resolvent-analysis-based design of airfoil separation control . J. Fluid Mech. 867 , 572--610

    2019

  61. [69]

    , Jovanovi \'c , M

    Zare, A. , Jovanovi \'c , M. R. & Georgiou, T. T. 2017 Colour of turbulence . J. Fluid Mech. 812 , 636--680

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.