Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Performance of UAV-based Cell-free mMIMO ISAC Networks: Tethered vs. Mobile

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.06398 v1 pith:FEGB3D6V submitted 2024-05-10 eess.SP

Performance of UAV-based Cell-free mMIMO ISAC Networks: Tethered vs. Mobile

classification eess.SP
keywords sensinguavsmobilecell-freeisacmmimotetheredtransmit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

The employment of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) aligned with multistatic sensing in integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) systems can provide remarkable performance gains in sensing, by taking advantage of the cell-free massive multiple-input multiple-output (mMIMO) architecture. Under these considerations, in this paper, the achievable sensing signal-to-noise-plus-interference ratio (SINR) of a cell-free mMIMO ISAC UAV-based network is evaluated for two different deployments of UAVs, namely, mobile and tethered. In both scenarios, a transmit precoder that jointly optimizes the sensing and communication requirements subjected to power constraints is designed. Specifically, for the scenario with mobile UAVs, beyond the transmit precoding, we also optimize the position of the transmit UAVs through particle swarm optimization (PSO). The results show that, although tethered UAVs have a more efficient power allocation, the proposed position control algorithm for the mobile UAVs can achieve a superior gain in terms of sensing SINR.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.