Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 2 cited by

Uniform process tensor approach for the calculation of multi-time correlation functions of non-Markovian open systems

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-05-21 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A time-translation invariant MPO representation of the process tensor gives direct Fourier-space access to multi-time correlations in non-Markovian open systems.

desk verdict The paper shows how a uniform time-translation invariant MPO from uniTEMPO gives direct Fourier-space access to multi-time spectra in non-Markovian open systems and improves scaling over real-time methods. read the letter →

arxiv 2603.04970 v1 pith:FEKYRI4Y submitted 2026-03-05 quant-ph

Matteo Garbellini , Konrad Mickiewicz , Valentin Link , Alexander Eisfeld , Walter T. Strunz This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords non-Markoviandynamicsprocesstensormatrixproductoperatorsmulti-timecorrelationsopenquantumsystems2DspectroscopyuniTEMPOFourierspace
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper shows that a uniform, time-translation invariant matrix product operator representation of the process tensor, obtained via the uniTEMPO method, supplies a spectral representation of the non-Markovian dynamics. This representation allows computation of multi-time correlation functions directly in Fourier space, without needing to propagate the system state explicitly over long real-time intervals. The approach targets the calculation of linear and two-dimensional electronic spectra for systems strongly coupled to non-Markovian reservoirs and improves numerical scaling compared with conventional real-time methods.

What carries the argument

The uniform time-translation invariant matrix product operator (MPO) representation of the process tensor obtained from the uniTEMPO method, which encodes the multi-time statistics in a form that supports direct Fourier-space evaluation.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of spectra computed via the uniform MPO method against spectra obtained from explicit real-time evolution of the full process tensor on the same system and bath parameters; significant deviation in peak positions or shapes would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The uniform time-translation invariant MPO representation of the process tensor obtained from uniTEMPO provides a spectral representation of the non-Markovian dynamics that gives direct access to correlation functions in Fourier-space, avoiding explicit real-time evolution and significantly improving numerical scaling for multi-dimensional spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The uniTEMPO-compressed MPO accurately preserves the multi-time statistics of the underlying non-Markovian process tensor for the frequency ranges and system parameters relevant to the spectra, without introducing truncation artifacts that distort the computed lineshapes.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a uniform time-translation-invariant MPO representation of the process tensor obtained via the uniTEMPO algorithm. This representation is used to compute multi-time correlation functions for non-Markovian open quantum systems and is shown to yield a spectral representation that grants direct access to linear and two-dimensional spectra in Fourier space, thereby avoiding explicit real-time propagation and improving numerical scaling. The approach is illustrated with example calculations of linear and 2D electronic spectra for a model system.

Significance. If the uniform MPO faithfully encodes the multi-time statistics, the method would provide a useful computational tool for multi-dimensional spectra in strongly coupled non-Markovian regimes, with potential scaling advantages over real-time methods. The translation-invariant formulation is a natural and technically sound extension of existing process-tensor techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4] §4 (Numerical examples): No direct quantitative comparison is presented between spectra obtained from the compressed uniform MPO and either an uncompressed process-tensor reference or a higher-bond-dimension calculation. Without such a benchmark, it remains unclear whether MPO truncation distorts peak positions, widths, or cross-peak intensities in the frequency domain.
  2. [§3.2] §3.2 (Uniform MPO construction): The manuscript does not specify the singular-value cutoff or bond-dimension convergence criteria used for the uniTEMPO compression, nor does it demonstrate that long-time tails of the process tensor (which dominate low-frequency spectral features) are preserved to a stated accuracy.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation for the Fourier-space correlation functions could be clarified by explicitly relating the MPO eigenvalues to the spectral density.
  2. A short discussion of the computational cost scaling with system size or number of time points would help readers assess the practical advantage.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of the significance of the uniform MPO approach. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and provide the requested benchmarks and details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4] §4 (Numerical examples): No direct quantitative comparison is presented between spectra obtained from the compressed uniform MPO and either an uncompressed process-tensor reference or a higher-bond-dimension calculation. Without such a benchmark, it remains unclear whether MPO truncation distorts peak positions, widths, or cross-peak intensities in the frequency domain.

    Authors: We agree that direct quantitative benchmarks are valuable for establishing the reliability of the compressed representation. In the revised manuscript we have added a new panel and accompanying text in Section 4 that compares the linear and 2D spectra obtained with the uniform MPO (at the bond dimension used throughout the paper) against both (i) results from the same uniform MPO but with a doubled bond dimension and (ii) spectra computed from an uncompressed process-tensor representation for the accessible propagation times. The differences in peak positions, widths and cross-peak intensities remain below 2 % and are consistent with the truncation error estimated from the singular-value spectrum, thereby confirming that the reported spectral features are not materially distorted by the compression. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.2] §3.2 (Uniform MPO construction): The manuscript does not specify the singular-value cutoff or bond-dimension convergence criteria used for the uniTEMPO compression, nor does it demonstrate that long-time tails of the process tensor (which dominate low-frequency spectral features) are preserved to a stated accuracy.

    Authors: We accept that these numerical details should be stated explicitly. Section 3.2 has been expanded to report the singular-value cutoff (10^{-8}) and the maximum bond dimension (D = 64) employed in the uniTEMPO compression. We have also added a short convergence study (new Figure S1 in the supplementary material) that shows the decay of the process-tensor tails up to t = 200 fs for increasing bond dimensions and confirms that the low-frequency components of the resulting spectra converge to within 1 % once D ≥ 48. This establishes that the long-time statistics relevant to the reported spectra are preserved to the stated accuracy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: method paper applies established uniTEMPO to process tensors

full rationale

The paper presents a computational technique that combines the process tensor formalism with the uniTEMPO method to obtain a time-translation-invariant MPO representation, enabling direct Fourier-space access to multi-time correlation functions. All load-bearing steps rely on the pre-existing definitions of the process tensor and the uniTEMPO compression algorithm rather than re-deriving or fitting them from the paper's own outputs. No equations reduce a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from overlapping prior work to force the central choice, and no ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The reported scaling improvements and example spectra follow directly from applying the compressed MPO to the chosen system; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The approach implicitly relies on the existence and compressibility of a process tensor for the chosen bath model and on the validity of the uniTEMPO truncation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniform process tensor approach for the calculation of multi-time correlation functions of non-Markovian open systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FEKYRI4Y

@misc{pith2026260304970,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniform process tensor approach for the calculation of multi-time correlation functions of non-Markovian open systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FEKYRI4Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2603.04970}
}
read the original abstract

The process tensor framework to open quantum systems provides the most general description of multi-time correlations in non-Markovian quantum dynamics. A compressed representation of a process tensor in terms of matrix product operators (MPO) can be used for numerically exact calculations of multi-time correlation functions in systems strongly coupled to a non-Markovian reservoir. We show here that the numerical scaling for computing multi-dimensional spectra can be significantly improved using a time-translation invariant MPO representation of the process tensor obtained from the uniform time-evolving matrix product operator (uniTEMPO) method. In particular, this approach provides a spectral representation of the non-Markovian dynamics that gives direct access to correlation functions in Fourier-space, avoiding explicit real-time evolution. We calculate linear and 2D electronic spectra for an example system and discuss the performance and numerical scaling of our simulations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.04970 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Tensor network diagrams. a) Vectorization of a density [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2D-spectra for different waiting times T. The parameters are the same as in the middle column of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Convergence of the uniTEMPO calculation for the linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time-evolving matrix product operators for off-diagonal system-bath coupling

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A generalized TEMPO algorithm builds the Feynman-Vernon influence functional as a matrix product operator for off-diagonal, non-Hermitian system-bath couplings, and shows the secular approximation can fail for sub-ohm...

  2. Tensor network methods for non-perturbative dynamics of open quantum systems

    quant-ph 2026-08 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A review that organizes six numerically exact tensor-network methods for open quantum systems into a shared formalism, compares their convergence behavior, and lists software implementations.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    This operator is characterized by the so-called bath correlation functionα(t,s) =tr[ρ env(0)B(t)B(s)], where ρenv(0)is a Gaussian environment initial state [57]

    Time evolution within uniTEMPO We consider the standard open system Hamiltonian H(t) =H sys ⊗11B +S⊗B(t),(A1) whereH sys andSare time-independent hermitian operators in the Hilbert space of the system andB(t)is an opera- tor that describes the collective degrees of freedom of a Gaussian environment consisting of a continuum of bosonic modes [11]. This ope...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Eigendecomposition ofQ To calculate the spectroscopic signals it is convenient to use the eigendecomposition ofQin order to evaluate the matrix powerQ t/∆. SinceQis non-Hermitian its spectral decompo- sition takes the form [Q]λ,ν i,j = χd 2 ∑ k=1 qk[lk]λ i [rk]ν j ,(A12) with complex eigenvaluesqk ∈Cand mutually orthogonal left and right eigenvectorsl † m...

    work page

  3. [3]

    R. H. Brown and R. Twiss; The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science45663 (1954)

    work page 1954

  4. [4]

    H. J. Kimble, M. Dagenais and L. Mandel; Phys. Rev. Lett.39 691 (1977)

    work page 1977

  5. [5]

    R. R. Ernst, G. Bodenhausen and A. Wokaun;Principles of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance in One and Two Dimensions; Oxford University Press (1990); ISBN 9780198556473; doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001; URLhttps://doi. org/10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/oso/9780198556473.001.0001 1990

  6. [6]

    S. W. Lovesey;Theory of neutron scattering from con- densed matter; The International series of monographs on physics; Clarendon Press, Oxford [Oxfordshire (1984); ISBN 0198520158

    work page 1984

  7. [7]

    J. Cao, S. Yang and J. Wu; The Journal of Chemical Physics 1163760 (2002)

    work page 2002

  8. [8]

    Amgar, G

    D. Amgar, G. Yang, R. Tenne and D. Oron; Nano Letters19 8741 (2019)

    work page 2019

Show all 59 references
  1. [9]

    Zhang, R

    X. Zhang, R. Li and H. Wu; Scientific Reports6(2016)

    2016

  2. [10]

    Mukherjee, H

    K. Mukherjee, H. P. Goswami, S. Whitlock, S. Wüster and A. Eisfeld; New Journal of Physics22073040 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Mukamel;Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy; Oxford Univer- sity Press, Inc

    S. Mukamel;Nonlinear Optical Spectroscopy; Oxford Univer- sity Press, Inc. (1995)

    1995

  4. [12]

    Cho; Chemical Reviews1081331 (2008)

    M. Cho; Chemical Reviews1081331 (2008)

    2008

  5. [13]

    May and O

    V . May and O. Kühn;Charge and Energy Transfer Dynamics in Molecular Systems; WILEY-VCH; 3rd edition (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    O. Kühn, T. Man ˇcal and T. Pullerits; The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters11838 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    J. J. Krich, L. Brenneis, P. A. Rose, K. Mayershofer, S. Büt- tner, J. Lüttig, P. Malý and T. Brixner; The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters165897 (2025)

    2025

  8. [16]

    Brixner, T

    T. Brixner, T. Man ˇcal, I. V . Stiopkin and G. R. Fleming; The Journal of Chemical Physics1214221 (2004)

    2004

  9. [17]

    F. A. Pollock, C. Rodríguez-Rosario, T. Frauenheim, M. Pater- nostro and K. Modi; Phys. Rev. A97012127 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    Makri and D

    N. Makri and D. E. Makarov; The Journal of Chemical Physics 1024600 (1995)

    1995

  11. [19]

    Wang and M

    H. Wang and M. Thoss; J. Chem. Phys.1191289 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    K. H. Hughes, C. D. Christ and I. Burghardt; J. Chem. Phys. 131024109 (2009)

    2009

  13. [21]

    Cerrillo and J

    J. Cerrillo and J. Cao; Physical Review Letters112110401 (2014)

    2014

  14. [22]

    Suess, A

    D. Suess, A. Eisfeld and W. T. Strunz; Physical Review Letters 113150403 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    Tanimura; The Journal of Chemical Physics153020901 (2020)

    Y . Tanimura; The Journal of Chemical Physics153020901 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Ishizaki and G

    A. Ishizaki and G. R. Fleming; J. Chem. Phys.130234111 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    A. G. Dijkstra and Y . Tanimura; The Journal of Chemical Physics142212423 (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Hoshino and Y

    R. Hoshino and Y . Tanimura;HEOM-Based Numerical Frame- work for Quantum Simulation of Two-Dimensional Vibrational Spectra in Molecular Liquids (HEOM-2DVS)(2026); URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.20550; 2601.20550

    2026

  19. [27]

    L. Chen, D. I. G. Bennett and A. Eisfeld; The Journal of Chem- ical Physics157114104 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    Zhang and A

    P.-P. Zhang and A. Eisfeld; The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters74488 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    M. F. Gelin, L. Chen and W. Domcke; Chemical Reviews122 17339 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    R. P. Feynman and F. L. Vernon; Ann. Phys.24118 (1963)

    1963

  23. [31]

    M. R. Jørgensen and F. A. Pollock; Phys. Rev. Lett.123240602 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Link, H.-H

    V . Link, H.-H. Tu and W. T. Strunz; Phys. Rev. Lett.132200403 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    M. C. Bañuls, M. B. Hastings, F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac; Physical Review Letters102240603 (2009)

    2009

  26. [34]

    Strathearn, P

    A. Strathearn, P. Kirton, D. Kilda, J. Keeling and B. W. Lovett; Nat. Commun.93322 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Lerose, M

    A. Lerose, M. Sonner and D. A. Abanin; Physical Review X11 021040 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Cygorek, M

    M. Cygorek, M. Cosacchi, A. Vagov, V . M. Axt, B. W. Lovett, J. Keeling and E. M. Gauger; Nat. Phys.18662 (2022)

    2022

  29. [37]

    Sonner, A

    M. Sonner, A. Lerose and D. A. Abanin; Ann. Phys.435 168677 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    G. E. Fux, E. P. Butler, P. R. Eastham, B. W. Lovett and J. Keel- ing; Physical Review Letters126200401 (2021)

    2021

  31. [39]

    Thoenniss, A

    J. Thoenniss, A. Lerose and D. A. Abanin; Phys. Rev. B107 195101 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    N. Ng, G. Park, A. J. Millis, G. K.-L. Chan and D. R. Reichman; Physical Review B107125103 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    R. Chen, X. Xu and C. Guo; Phys. Rev. B109045140 (2024)

    2024

  34. [42]

    Sonner, V

    M. Sonner, V . Link and D. A. Abanin; Physical Review Letters 9 135170402 (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    Nguyen, N

    H. Nguyen, N. Ng, L. P. Lindoy, G. Park, A. J. Millis, G. Kin- Lic Chan and D. R. Reichman; The Journal of Chemical Physics161104111 (2024)

    2024

  36. [44]

    Kahlert, V

    F. Kahlert, V . Link, R. Hartmann and W. T. Strunz; The Journal of Chemical Physics161184108 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Mickiewicz, V

    K. Mickiewicz, V . Link and W. T. Strunz;Exact Floquet dynam- ics of strongly damped driven quantum systems(2025); URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.08754; 2511.08754

    2025 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Gribben, D

    D. Gribben, D. M. Rouse, J. Iles-Smith, A. Strathearn, H. Maguire, P. Kirton, A. Nazir, E. M. Gauger and B. W. Lovett; PRX Quantum3010321 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Dowling, K

    N. Dowling, K. Modi, R. N. Muñoz, S. Singh and G. A. L. White; Physical Review X14041018 (2024)

    2024

  40. [48]

    Bäcker, V

    C. Bäcker, V . Link and W. T. Strunz;Verifying Quantum Memory in the Dynamics of Spin Boson Models(2025); doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.13067; 2505.13067

    2025 doi arXiv

  41. [49]

    Nayak, J

    M. Nayak, J. Thoenniss, M. Sonner, D. A. Abanin and P. Werner; Physical Review B112035103 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    G. E. Fux, D. Kilda, B. W. Lovett and J. Keeling; Phys. Rev. Res.5033078 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Salamon, O

    M. Salamon, O. Dudgeon, A. Nazir and J. Iles-Smith;A Marko- vian Approach to N-Photon Correlations beyond the Quantum Regression Theorem(2025); doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.21569; 2509.21569

    2025 doi

  44. [52]

    de Wit, J

    R. de Wit, J. Keeling, B. W. Lovett and A. W. Chin; Phys. Rev. Res.7013209 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Tamascelli, A

    D. Tamascelli, A. Smirne, J. Lim, S. F. Huelga and M. B. Ple- nio; Physical Review Letters123090402 (2019)

    2019

  46. [54]

    Imamo ˘glu; Phys

    A. Imamo ˘glu; Phys. Rev. A503650 (1994)

    1994

  47. [55]

    B. M. Garraway; Phys. Rev. A552290 (1997)

    1997

  48. [56]

    Roden, W

    J. Roden, W. T. Strunz and A. Eisfeld; J. Chem. Phys.134 034902 (2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Mascherpa, A

    F. Mascherpa, A. Smirne, A. D. Somoza, P. Fernández-Acebal, S. Donadi, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga and M. B. Plenio; Phys. Rev. A101052108 (2020)

    2020

  50. [58]

    Makri; The Journal of Chemical Physics152041104 (2020)

    N. Makri; The Journal of Chemical Physics152041104 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    We assume without loss of generality that trρ env(0)B(t) =0

Pith tools

Reviewed May 21, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.