Detecting Lifshitz Transitions Using Nonlinear Conductivity in Bilayer Graphene

Amit Agarwal; Bao Q. Tu; F\`elix Casanova; Harsh Varshney; Kenji Watanabe; Luis E. Hueso; Marco Gobbi; Takashi Taniguchi; Tanweer Ahmed

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Detecting Lifshitz Transitions Using Nonlinear Conductivity in Bilayer Graphene

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Bilayer graphene's second-harmonic electrical response reverses sign at the Lifshitz transition, giving a zero-magnetic-field way to detect Fermi surface topology changes at temperatures of 10 K and above.

desk verdict A solid, useful demonstration that NLER sign reversal tracks the Lifshitz transition in bilayer graphene, with a real but addressable weakness in how the zero-field transition density is calibrated. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.05871 v1 pith:FIQ6POWL submitted 2025-07-08 cond-mat.mes-hall

Tanweer Ahmed , Harsh Varshney , Bao Q. Tu , Kenji Watanabe , Takashi Taniguchi , Marco Gobbi , Fèlix Casanova , Amit Agarwal

show 1 more author

Luis E. Hueso

This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords bilayergrapheneLifshitztransitionnonlinearHalleffectsecond-orderconductivityBerrycurvaturedipoleskewscatteringsidejumpvanHovesingularity

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the second-order nonlinear electrical response (NLER) of Bernal bilayer graphene changes sign at the Lifshitz transition, the carrier density at which the Fermi surface changes from three separate pockets into one, and that this sign reversal can locate the transition at temperatures of 10 K and above without any magnetic field. This matters because Lifshitz transitions are usually detected through Landau-level crossings or quantum oscillations that require high magnetic fields and very low temperatures, whereas NLER offers a purely electrical, zero-field signature of Fermi surface topology. The authors combine magnetotransport, second-harmonic transport, and theory to show that the sign change is produced by both extrinsic scattering (skew scattering and side jump) and an intrinsic Berry curvature dipole from interfacial strain, with the intrinsic transverse component dominating near the charge neutrality point and switchable by a vertical displacement field. They also report a second-order conductivity above $30\ \mu\mathrm{mV}^{-1}\Omega^{-1}$ at 3 K, larger than earlier reports in two-dimensional van der Waals systems.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the second-order conductivity tensor $\sigma^{2\omega}_{abc}$, defined by $j_a^{2\omega} = \sigma^{2\omega}_{abc} E_b^\omega E_c^\omega$, whose magnitude and sign are governed by the Fermi-surface quantities $\partial^2 f(\mathbf{k})/\partial k_a \partial k_b$ and $\partial f(\mathbf{k})/\partial k_a$. Near the bilayer-graphene band edge at energy $\epsilon_L$, the low-energy Fermi surface changes from three pockets to one via a Lifshitz transition, producing a van Hove singularity and a change in the sign of the effective mass on the inner island; this is where the NLER is computed and observed to change sign. The experimental method is a lock-in measurement of the second-harmonic longitudinal and transverse voltages with current and voltage probe polarities flipped and anti-symmetrized, and the theoretical machinery combines a generalized scaling theory for extrinsic skew-scattering and side-jump contributions with a strained-bilayer Hamiltonian calculation of the intrinsic Berry curvature dipole. The 1:2:1 ratio of the scaling coefficients serves as the fingerprint that identifies the intrinsic contribution in the transverse channel.

What would settle it

Measure the zero-field second-harmonic transverse voltage in a bilayer graphene device whose Lifshitz density is determined independently by a zero-field probe such as thermoelectric power or compressibility, and check whether the NLER sign-change density coincides with that independently measured $n_L$; a mismatch, or a sign-change line that tracks the van Hove singularity rather than the pocket-merging transition, would overturn the attribution.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that the antisymmetrized second-harmonic voltages $V_{xx}^{(2\omega)}$ and $V_{xy}^{(2\omega)}$ in dual-gated hBN-encapsulated bilayer graphene reverse sign at carrier densities $n_L^{e\pm}$ and $n_L^{h\pm}$ that match the displacement-field-dependent Lifshitz transitions of the low-energy bands. By identifying the Lifshitz transition first through changes in Landau-level degeneracy and crossings in the magnetotransport fan diagram, the authors establish that the NLER sign reversal is a marker of the Fermi-surface topology change itself, not merely of the band gap or charge neutrality. The observed sign changes are reproduced by calculations of skew-scattering and Berry-curvature-dipole contributions, and the transverse response near the charge neutrality point exhibits the 1:2:1 scaling ratio among the coefficients $\mathcal{C}_1$, $\mathcal{C}_2$, and $\mathcal{C}_3$ that the generalized scaling theory predicts when the intrinsic dipole dominates. The conclusion is that NLER is a reliable, zero-magnetic-field probe of Lifshitz transitions in inversion-broken bilayer graphene at $T \ge 10$ K.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the carrier density read off the finite-magnetic-field Landau-level crossings corresponds exactly to the zero-field, 10 K Lifshitz-transition density, so that the NLER sign change at that density is caused by the Fermi surface topology change and not by magnetic-field-induced renormalization of the band structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

NLER sign reversal becomes a zero-field, high-temperature probe for locating Lifshitz transitions in any inversion-broken two-dimensional conductor with a tunable Fermi surface.
The displacement-field dependence of the sign-change lines provides a direct map of how the Lifshitz transition density moves with interlayer potential, useful for band-structure metrology in bilayer graphene devices.
The 1:2:1 scaling-ratio test gives a practical way to separate intrinsic Berry-curvature-dipole response from extrinsic scattering response in nonlinear transport measurements.
With second-order conductivity exceeding $30\ \mu\mathrm{mV}^{-1}\Omega^{-1}$, bilayer graphene becomes a competitive nonlinear element for frequency doubling and energy harvesting.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension is to apply the same sign-change criterion to other gapped two-dimensional materials where Lifshitz transitions are predicted but difficult to reach with high-field probes.
Because the intrinsic contribution requires strain-induced symmetry lowering, the sharpness and position of the transverse sign-change line might be developed into a quantitative local strain sensor in heterostructures.
The technique could be combined with gate-defined junctions to map Fermi surface topology spatially, something Landau-level spectroscopy cannot do at zero field.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know about this one: it makes a genuinely useful experimental claim—second-order nonlinear conductivity changes sign at the Lifshitz transition in bilayer graphene, and can therefore serve as a zero-magnetic-field, elevated-temperature probe of Fermi surface topology. The paper backs this with a parallel theory calculation, and the central conclusion is likely right. I'd send it to a serious referee, though not without asking for one important revision.

What's new and good: this is the first combined experimental and theoretical study showing NLER sign reversal at the Lifshitz transition in a clean, tunable bilayer graphene system. The transverse response near charge neutrality being dominated by a strain-induced Berry curvature dipole is a nice extension of prior work in moiré systems to a simpler platform. The experiments look careful: they anti-symmetrize the 2ω voltages to remove configurational artifacts, show parabolic scaling with the fundamental voltage, check multiple samples, and the scaling analysis with C1:C2:C3 ≈ 1:2:1 is a compelling fingerprint for intrinsic BCD. The skew-scattering calculation reproducing sign changes at the Lifshitz transition gives independent theoretical support.

The soft spots are real but not fatal. The weakest link is the calibration of the zero-field Lifshitz density n_L. It comes from Landau level crossings at B = 2.4–7.6 T and prior literature, with no explicit B→0 extrapolation and no stated uncertainty on the sign-change lines in the n–D plane. Since those sign changes occur where the 2ω signal vanishes into noise, the line positions could carry a systematic offset of order 10^10 cm^-2. I don't think this sinks the claim—the degeneracy changes in the fan diagram are a standard and reasonably reliable marker—but the paper should at least discuss the possible field-induced shifts and give error bars on the extracted n_L values. Second, the theory uses 1% uniaxial strain while Raman shows up to 0.6% heterostrain in the measured samples; that's a parameter assumed, not measured, so the theory is qualitative. Third, the headline-grabbing "record conductivity" claim lacks error bars and a comparison table in the main text. Minor: raw data are promised for after publication, not yet available.

Bottom line: this is a worthwhile paper for anyone working on nonlinear transport, Berry curvature dipole physics, or Lifshitz transitions in 2D materials. It deserves peer review, with a request for an explicit B→0 discussion and uncertainty quantification on the transition density. I would cite it once the data are available.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports measurements of the second-order nonlinear electrical response (NLER) in dual-gated Bernal bilayer graphene at temperatures between 2 and 10 K. The authors show that the anti-symmetrized 2ω longitudinal and transverse voltages change sign both at the charge neutrality point and near densities n_L^{e±}, n_L^{h±} that they associate with Lifshitz transitions of the gapped bilayer band structure. The Lifshitz densities are identified independently from changes in Landau level degeneracy and LL crossings in the B-field fan diagram, and are compared with previous reports. Supporting calculations in the SI give skew-scattering and Berry-curvature-dipole contributions that also change sign near the Lifshitz transitions and at the CNP. The paper further reports a second-order conductivity exceeding 30 µV^-1 Ω^-1 at high doping, and concludes that NLER provides a general zero-field probe of Lifshitz transitions in inversion-broken materials.

Significance. The proposed zero-magnetic-field, elevated-temperature electrical signature of a Lifshitz transition is potentially valuable, because conventional probes such as quantum oscillations and thermoelectricity often require low temperatures or high fields. The paper has notable strengths: multiple devices (Sa–Sd), a clear antisymmetrization procedure to remove setup-asymmetric backgrounds, an independent LL-based identification of the transition, a scaling analysis whose 1:2:1 coefficient ratio supports a dominant intrinsic contribution to the transverse response, and explicit microscopic calculations of both extrinsic and intrinsic nonlinear conductivities. The data availability statement promises deposition in Zenodo. The principal weakness is the calibration of the zero-field Lifshitz density from finite-field data, which affects the central claim but is addressable in revision.

major comments (3)

[Fig. 1e–f, Fig. 3a] The central claim that the NLER sign changes at n_L^{e±} and n_L^{h±} locate the Lifshitz transition rests on equating the zero-field, T = 10 K Lifshitz densities with the finite-field Landau-level crossing densities of Fig. 1e–f. The manuscript provides no B→0 extrapolation of the crossing densities, and the comparison to Ref. [39] is for a different device with an indirectly inferred interlayer asymmetry. Moreover, the 2ω signal is described as vanishing into experimental noise at these lines, yet the plotted n_L lines have no stated uncertainty and no criterion is given for extracting their positions from the n–D maps. If the zero-B Lifshitz density is displaced from the finite-B crossing density by an amount comparable to the lobe width (~10^10 cm^-2), the attribution is not established. I request an explicit B→0 extrapolation of the LL crossings, a direct zero-field measurement of n_L in the same device, or a quantitative estimate of the systematic error and a correspondingly softened interpretation.
[Fig. 3c–d, SI Sec. 11] The intrinsic Berry-curvature-dipole calculation is presented with 1% uniaxial strain and Δ = ±0.05 eV, whereas the Raman data on the same samples show heterostrain up to 0.6% and the experimental control parameter is D/ε0 rather than Δ. The calculation is therefore a qualitative consistency check, not a quantitative reproduction of the sample parameters. The text should state this limitation explicitly; ideally the calculation should be repeated at the measured strain magnitude and with a mapping of Δ to the experimental D range. The 1:2:1 scaling ratio in Fig. 4b provides independent evidence for an intrinsic contribution, but it does not by itself identify strain-induced BCD as the mechanism.
[Conclusion, §3] The conclusion states that the experimental and theoretical study 'confirms that n_L^{e±} and n_L^{h±} are related to Lifshitz transition.' Given the calibration issue above and the qualitative nature of the strain calculation, this wording is stronger than the evidence supports; 'consistent with' would be more accurate unless a quantitative comparison of the calculated and measured sign-change positions is added.

minor comments (5)

[Abstract and Sec. 3] The reported second-order conductivity is written as '30 µmV−1Ω−1' in the abstract, main text, and conclusion, but as '30 µV^-1Ω^-1' in the SI discussion; the unit notation is typographically ambiguous and should be defined once (e.g., as current-per-width per electric-field-squared) and used consistently.
[Throughout] Typos and notation: p. 3 'in evitable' should be 'inevitable'; Ref. [1] 'Sov. Phys. JEPT' should be 'JETP'; '3 fold degenerate' should be 'threefold degenerate'; the notation V_{xx(y)}^{2ω} should be defined at first use.
[Fig. 3a caption] The caption states 'The feature marked with a white arrow arises from the non-top gated BLG contacts,' but the arrow is neither labeled in the color-scale panels nor discussed in the text; please clarify or remove this sentence.
[Data availability] The availability statement says source data can be obtained from the authors and will be uploaded to Zenodo upon publication; depositing the raw data before publication would strengthen reproducibility.
[Fig. 4a–b] The scaling fits report C1, C2, C3 with standard errors, but no goodness-of-fit statistics or number of temperature points; adding the reduced χ² and temperature range would make the 1:2:1 ratio claim more quantitative.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the NLER sign reversal is benchmarked to an independent Landau-level Lifshitz probe and external literature, and the theory is computed from stated parameters rather than fitted to the target data.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is: (1) identify the Lifshitz transition density n_L from Landau-level degeneracy changes and crossings in the B = 2.4–7.6 T fan diagram (Fig. 1e–f), together with matching to prior independent reports at similar interlayer asymmetry [39]; (2) measure the 2ω transverse and longitudinal voltages, anti-symmetrize them, and observe sign changes in the n–D phase space; (3) label those sign changes n_L^{e±} and n_L^{h±}; (4) support the assignment with a microscopic calculation of skew-scattering and intrinsic Berry-curvature-dipole contributions using stated parameters (1% strain, Δ = ±0.05 eV), not parameters fitted to the NLER data. No equation defines n_L in terms of the NLER sign change, and the sign-change lines are not used as inputs to the theory. The C1:C2:C3 scaling fit is a post-hoc decomposition of measured data using an independently derived scaling form; interpreting the 1:2:1 ratio as intrinsic BCD dominance is an interpretation, not a prediction forced by construction. The cited works by the present authors are background and method references; none is used to prove the central claim. The finite-B to zero-B extrapolation of n_L is a quantitative uncertainty that should be assessed as experimental risk, but it is not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the standard BLG band structure, the symmetry-based extraction of the second-order response, and a scaling law whose derivation is in the unpublished SI. The only adjustable modeling choice is the 1% uniaxial strain used in the BCD calculation. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

Scaling coefficients C1, C2, C3 = Fig. 4a: C1 = -5.5e-6, C2 = -9.6e-6 V^-1; Fig. 4b: C1 = 1.6e-6, C2 = 3.8e-6, C3 = 2.2e-6 V^-1
Fitted to the temperature-dependent scaling of normalized 2omega voltages to separate intrinsic Berry curvature dipole, side jump, and skew scattering contributions; the 1:2:1 ratio of C1:C2:C3 is then used to infer dominant intrinsic response near the charge neutrality point.
Uniaxial strain in BCD calculation = 1%
The theoretical sigma_yxx^in is computed for 1% uniaxial strain, while Raman data on samples Sb and Sc indicate up to 0.6% heterostrain. This is a chosen modeling parameter, not fitted to the NLER data, and strain direction/uniformity are uncontrolled.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Bernal-stacked bilayer graphene under interlayer potential Delta has a Lifshitz transition at E = epsilon_L ~ 2 meV above the band edge (Refs 27-29).
Used to interpret the Fermi surface evolution in Fig. 1d and to label the n_L sign-change lines in Fig. 3a; the band structure model is taken from the cited literature, not derived here.
domain assumption The anti-symmetrized 2omega voltage, V^(2omega(a)) = (V^(2omega)|theta - V^(2omega)|theta+pi)/2, is the true second-order nonlinear response, with even-under-reversal thermal and disorder contributions fully removed.
This is the standard symmetry decomposition for NLER (Refs 6-13, 38), but the text does not prove that no second-harmonic thermal artifact survives the anti-symmetrization.
domain assumption The generalized scaling law rho_xx^2 V^(2omega)/V_omega^2 = C1 rho0^2 + C2 rho0 rho_T + C3 rho_T^2 (SI section 10) governs the disorder-induced NLER, with the intrinsic contribution entering C1, C2, C3 with weights 1:2:1.
The derivation is delegated to SI section 10, which is not included in the arXiv submission; the 1:2:1 weight rule is the basis for concluding that the transverse response is intrinsic near CNP.
domain assumption The finite-field Landau level degeneracy change and crossings (Fig. 1e-f) locate the same Lifshitz transition that controls the zero-field, T = 10 K NLER sign changes (Fig. 3a).
No extrapolation from B = 2.4-7.6 T to B = 0 is shown; the identification relies on the assumption that the field does not move the transition density.
ad hoc to paper A 1% uniaxial strain model captures the strain-induced Berry curvature dipole present in devices with uncontrolled heterostrain of up to 0.6%.
The strain magnitude, direction, and uniformity are not measured directly, so the theory-experiment comparison for the intrinsic transverse NLER is qualitative and model-specific.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Detecting Lifshitz Transitions Using Nonlinear Conductivity in Bilayer Graphene." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FIQ6POWL

@misc{pith2026250705871,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Detecting Lifshitz Transitions Using Nonlinear Conductivity in Bilayer Graphene},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FIQ6POWL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.05871}
}

abstract

The second-order nonlinear electrical response (NLER) is an intrinsic property of inversion symmetry-broken systems which can provide deep insights into the electronic band structures of atomically thin quantum materials. However, the impact of Fermi surface reconstructions, also known as Lifshitz transitions, on the NLER has remained elusive. We investigated NLER in bilayer graphene (BLG), where the low-energy bands undergo Lifshitz transitions. Here, NLER undergoes a sign change near the Lifshitz transitions even at elevated temperatures $T\gtrsim10~$K. At the band edge, NLER in BLG is modulated by both extrinsic scattering and interfacial-strain-induced intrinsic Berry curvature dipole, both of which can be finely tuned externally by varying doping and interlayer potential. Away from the band edge, BLG exhibits second-order conductivity exceeding $30~\mu$mV$^{-1}\Omega^{-1}$ at 3K higher than any previous report. Our work establishes NLER as a reliable tool to probe Lifshitz transitions in quantum materials.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages

[39]

Huang et al., Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect and Gate -Switchable Berry Curvature Sliding in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys

M. Huang et al., Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect and Gate -Switchable Berry Curvature Sliding in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 066301 (2023)

work page 2023
[1]

I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Sov. Phys. JEPT 11, 1130 (1960)

1960
[2]

F. K. de Vries et al., Kagome Quantum Oscillations in Graphene Superlattices, Nano Lett. 24, 601 (2024)

work page 2024
[3]

D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

1982
[4]

Chang et al., Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

C.-Z. Chang et al., Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

2013
[5]

Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, S. Li, H. -Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Disorder-induced nonlinear Hall effect with time-reversal symmetry, Nat. Commun. 10, 3047 (2019)

work page 2019
[6]

P. He, G. K. W. Koon, H. Isobe, J. Y . Tan, J. Hu, A. H. C. Neto, L. Fu, and H. Yang, Graphene moiré superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral Bloch electrons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 378 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

J. Duan, Y . Jian, Y . Gao, H. Peng, J. Zhong, Q. Feng, J. Mao, and Y . Yao, Giant Second -Order Nonlinear Hall Effect in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 186801 (2022)

work page 2022

Show all 47 references

[8]

P. He, H. Isobe, D. Zhu, C.-H. Hsu, L. Fu, and H. Yang, Quantum frequency doubling in the topological insulator Bi2Se3, Nat. Commun. 12, 698 (2021)

2021
[9]

K. Kang, T. Li, E. Sohn, J. Shan, and K. F. Mak, Nonlinear anomalous Hall effect in few -layer WTe2, Nat. Mater. 18, 324 (2019)

2019
[10]

Suárez -Rodríguez, Odd Nonlinear Conductivity under Spatial Inversion in Chiral Tellurium, Phys

M. Suárez -Rodríguez, Odd Nonlinear Conductivity under Spatial Inversion in Chiral Tellurium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, (2024)

2024
[11]

Furthermore, experimentally observed values of 𝑛𝐿𝑒± and 𝑛𝐿ℎ± closely matches with previous reports in BLG at similar interlayer asymmetry [39]

demonstrates sign changes at only at CNP and in the vicinity of Lifshitz transitions . Furthermore, experimentally observed values of 𝑛𝐿𝑒± and 𝑛𝐿ℎ± closely matches with previous reports in BLG at similar interlayer asymmetry [39]. Our experimental and theoretical study confirm...
[12]

Ma et al., Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time -reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature 565, 337 (2019)

Q. Ma et al., Observation of the nonlinear Hall effect under time -reversal-symmetric conditions, Nature 565, 337 (2019)

2019
[13]

Sinha et al., Berry curvature dipole senses topological transition in a moiré superlattice, Nat

S. Sinha et al., Berry curvature dipole senses topological transition in a moiré superlattice, Nat. Phys. 18, 765 (2022). 7

2022
[14]

S.-C. Ho, C. -H. Chang, Y .-C. Hsieh, S. -T. Lo, B. Huang, T.-H.-Y . Vu, C. Ortix, and T.-M. Chen, Hall effects in artificially corrugated bilayer graphene without breaking time -reversal symmetry, Nat. Electron. 4, 116 (2021)

2021
[15]

He and H

Z. He and H. Weng, Giant nonlinear Hall effect in twisted bilayer WTe2, Npj Quantum Mater. 6, 1 (2021)

2021
[16]

K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Intrinsic nonlinear conductivities induced by the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. B 108, L201405 (2023)

2023
[17]

P. C. Adak, S. Sinha, A. Agarwal, and M. M. Deshmukh, Tunable moiré materials for probing Berry physics and topology, Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 481 (2024)

2024
[18]

Sodemann, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time - Reversal Invariant Materials, Phys

I. Sodemann, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time - Reversal Invariant Materials, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, (2015)

2015
[19]

Chakraborty, K

A. Chakraborty, K. Das, S. Sinha, P. C. Adak, M. M. Deshmukh, and A. Agarwal, Nonlinear anomalous Hall effects probe topological phase - transitions in twisted double bilayer graphene, 2D Mater. 9, 045020 (2022)

2022
[20]

Z. Z. Du, H.-Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Nonlinear Hall effects, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 744 (2021)

2021
[21]

Bhalla, K

P. Bhalla, K. Das, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Resonant Second -Harmonic Generation as a Probe of Quantum Geometry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 227401 (2022)

2022
[22]

Datta, S

S. Datta, S. Bhowmik, H. Varshney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. Agarwal, and U. Chandni, Nonlinear Electrical Transport Unveils Fermi Surface Malleability in a Moiré Heterostructure, Nano Lett. 24, 9520 (2024)

2024
[23]

Shi et al., Tunable Lifshitz Transitions and Multiband Transport in Tetralayer Graphene, Phys

Y . Shi et al., Tunable Lifshitz Transitions and Multiband Transport in Tetralayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 096802 (2018)

2018
[24]

Lin et al., Heteromoiré Engineering on Magnetic Bloch Transport in Twisted Graphene Superlattices, Nano Lett

F. Lin et al., Heteromoiré Engineering on Magnetic Bloch Transport in Twisted Graphene Superlattices, Nano Lett. 20, 7572 (2020)

2020
[25]

Huang et al., Giant nonlinear Hall effect in twisted bilayer WSe2, Natl

M. Huang et al., Giant nonlinear Hall effect in twisted bilayer WSe2, Natl. Sci. Rev. 10, nwac232 (2023)

2023
[26]

Isobe, S

H. Isobe, S. -Y . Xu, and L. Fu, High -frequency rectification via chiral Bloch electrons, Sci. Adv. 6, eaay2497 (2020)

2020
[27]

Suárez -Rodríguez, B

M. Suárez -Rodríguez, B. Martín -García, W. Skowroński, K. Staszek, F. Calavalle, A. Fert, M. Gobbi, F. Casanova, and L. E. Hueso, Microscale Chiral Rectennas for Energy Harvesting, Adv. Mater. 36, 2400729 (2024)

2024
[28]

Varlet, D

A. Varlet, D. Bischoff, P. Simonet, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, M. Mucha - Kruczyński, and V . I. Fal’ko, Anomalous Sequence of Quantum Hall Liquids Revealing a Tunable Lifshitz Transition in Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 116602 (2014)

2014
[29]

Varlet, M

A. Varlet, M. Mucha-Kruczyński, D. Bischoff, P. Simonet, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, V . Fal’ko, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Tunable Fermi surface topology and Lifshitz transition in bilayer graphene, Synth. Met. 210, 19 (2015)

2015
[30]

A. M. Seiler, N. Jacobsen, M. Statz, N. Fernandez, F. Falorsi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Dong, L. S. Levitov, and R. T. Weitz, Probing the tunable multi-cone band structure in Bernal bilayer graphene, Nat. Commun. 15, 3133 (2024)

2024
[31]

Suárez -Rodríguez, B

M. Suárez -Rodríguez, B. Martín -García, F. Calavalle, S. S. Tsirkin, I. Souza, F. D. Juan, A. Fert, M. Gobbi, L. E. Hueso, and F. Casanova, Symmetry Origin and Microscopic Mechanism of Electrical Magnetochiral Anisotropy in Tellurium, arXiv:2406.17389

arXiv
[32]

Parity Anomaly,

F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a Quantum Hall Effect without Landau Levels: Condensed -Matter Realization of the “Parity Anomaly,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2015 (1988)

1988
[33]

Shimazaki, M

Y . Shimazaki, M. Yamamoto, I. V . Borzenets, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and S. Tarucha, Generation and detection of pure valley current by electrically induced Berry curvature in bilayer graphene, Nat. Phys. 11, 1032 (2015)

2015
[34]

Battilomo, N

R. Battilomo, N. Scopigno, and C. Ortix, Berry Curvature Dipole in Strained Graphene: A Fermi Surface Warping Effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 196403 (2019)

2019
[35]

Dutta, A

R. Dutta, A. Ghosh, S. Mandal, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, H. R. Krishnamurthy, S. Banerjee, M. Jain, and A. Das, Electric Field Tunable Superconductivity with Competing Orders in Twisted Bilayer Graphene near Magic -Angle, arXiv:2402.11649

arXiv
[36]

K. Roy, T. Ahmed, H. Dubey, T. P. Sai, R. Kashid, S. Maliakal, K. Hsieh, S. Shamim, and A. Ghosh, Number-Resolved Single -Photon Detection with Ultralow Noise van der Waals Hybrid, Adv. Mater. 30, 1704412 (2018)

2018
[37]

Ahmed, K

T. Ahmed, K. Roy, S. Kakkar, A. Pradhan, and A. Ghosh, Interplay of charge transfer and disorder in optoelectronic response in Graphene/hBN/MoS2 van der Waals heterostructures, 2D Mater. 7, 025043 (2020)

2020
[38]

Zhang, T.-T

Y . Zhang, T.-T. Tang, C. Girit, Z. Hao, M. C. Martin, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, Y . R. Shen, and F. Wang, Direct observation of a widely tunable bandgap in bilayer graphene, Nature 459, 820 (2009)

2009
[40]

H. Zhou, L. Holleis, Y . Saito, L. Cohen, W. Huynh, C. L. Patterson, F. Yang, T. Taniguchi, K. 8 Watanabe, and A. F. Young, Isospin magnetism and spin -polarized superconductivity in Bernal bilayer graphene, Science 375, 774 (2022)

2022
[41]

Ahmed, M

T. Ahmed, M. H. Naik, S. Kumari, S. P. Suman, R. Debnath, S. Dutta, U. V . Waghmare, M. Jain, and A. Ghosh, Thermodynamically stable octahedral MoS2 in van der Waals hetero-bilayers, 2D Mater. 6, 041002 (2019)

2019
[42]

Ahmed, P

T. Ahmed, P. Bellare, R. Debnath, A. Roy, N. Ravishankar, and A. Ghosh, Thermal History - Dependent Current Relaxation in hBN/MoS2 van der Waals Dimers, ACS Nano 14, 5909 (2020)

2020
[43]

Oakes, R

L. Oakes, R. Carter, T. Hanken, A. P. Cohn, K. Share, B. Schmidt, and C. L. Pint, Interface strain in vertically stacked two -dimensional heterostructured carbon -MoS2 nanosheets controls electrochemical reactivity, Nat. Commun. 7, 11796 (2016)

2016
[44]

Chiodini et al., Moiré Modulation of Van Der Waals Potential in Twisted Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Nano 16, 7589 (2022)

S. Chiodini et al., Moiré Modulation of Van Der Waals Potential in Twisted Hexagonal Boron Nitride, ACS Nano 16, 7589 (2022)

2022
[45]

Jayaraman, K

A. Jayaraman, K. Hsieh, B. Ghawri, P. S. Mahapatra, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and A. Ghosh, Evidence of Lifshitz Transition in the Thermoelectric Power of Ultrahigh -Mobility Bilayer Graphene, Nano Lett. 21, 1221 (2021)

2021
[46]

Neumann et al., Raman spectroscopy as probe of nanometre-scale strain variations in graphene, Nat

C. Neumann et al., Raman spectroscopy as probe of nanometre-scale strain variations in graphene, Nat. Commun. 6, 8429 (2015)

2015
[47]

N. P. Kazmierczak, M. Van Winkle, C. Ophus, K. C. Bustillo, S. Carr, H. G. Brown, J. Ciston, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, and D. K. Bediako, Strain fields in twisted bilayer graphene, Nat. Mater. 20, 956 (2021)

2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [39]

Huang et al., Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect and Gate -Switchable Berry Curvature Sliding in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys

M. Huang et al., Intrinsic Nonlinear Hall Effect and Gate -Switchable Berry Curvature Sliding in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 066301 (2023)

work page 2023

[2] [1]

I. M. Lifshitz, Anomalies of electron characteristics of a metal in the high pressure region, Sov. Phys. JEPT 11, 1130 (1960)

1960

[3] [2]

F. K. de Vries et al., Kagome Quantum Oscillations in Graphene Superlattices, Nano Lett. 24, 601 (2024)

work page 2024

[4] [3]

D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized Hall Conductance in a Two-Dimensional Periodic Potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 405 (1982)

1982

[5] [4]

Chang et al., Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

C.-Z. Chang et al., Experimental Observation of the Quantum Anomalous Hall Effect in a Magnetic Topological Insulator, Science 340, 167 (2013)

2013

[6] [5]

Z. Z. Du, C. M. Wang, S. Li, H. -Z. Lu, and X. C. Xie, Disorder-induced nonlinear Hall effect with time-reversal symmetry, Nat. Commun. 10, 3047 (2019)

work page 2019

[7] [6]

P. He, G. K. W. Koon, H. Isobe, J. Y . Tan, J. Hu, A. H. C. Neto, L. Fu, and H. Yang, Graphene moiré superlattices with giant quantum nonlinearity of chiral Bloch electrons, Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 378 (2022)

work page 2022

[8] [7]

J. Duan, Y . Jian, Y . Gao, H. Peng, J. Zhong, Q. Feng, J. Mao, and Y . Yao, Giant Second -Order Nonlinear Hall Effect in Twisted Bilayer Graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 186801 (2022)

work page 2022