Antipodal self-duality of square fishnet graphs

Claude Duhr; Lance J. Dixon

Antipodal self-duality of square fishnet graphs

T0 review · 0 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proves that every square fishnet Feynman integral in the planar fishnet theory is invariant under the twisted antipode map, for every grid size $m$, and at function level.

desk verdict Proves antipodal self-duality for all square fishnet integrals at function level; the proof is real, and the load sits in Appendix B's coefficient match, which deserves a careful check. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00862 v2 pith:FKQD4BVV submitted 2025-02-02 hep-th hep-ph

Lance J. Dixon , Claude Duhr This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-thhep-ph

keywords antipodalself-dualityfishnetintegralsmultiplepolylogarithmsHopfalgebraantipodesingle-valuedladderdeterminantrepresentationplanarN=4super-Yang-Mills

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves that every square fishnet integral — the Feynman integral computing a four-point correlation function of length-$m$ scalar operators in the planar fishnet theory, drawn as an $m\times m$ grid of propagators — is invariant under an operation called the twisted antipode. This operation combines the antipode of the Hopf algebra on multiple polylogarithms with a conjugation and inversion of the kinematic variables. The symmetry is established for every integer $m$, at function level, not merely at symbol level, and by a proof that covers all $m$ at once. This makes antipodal self-duality a proven property of an infinite family of Feynman integrals, whereas previously it had been observed for isolated amplitudes and form factors and remained conjectural at high loop order.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the ladder integrals $f_p$, the determinant representation $\phi_{m,n}=\det(f_{n-m+i+j-1})$, and the twisted antipode $\hat{S}=CS$, where $S$ is the Hopf-algebra antipode on multiple polylogarithms and $C$ conjugates holomorphic letters and conjugates-and-inverts antiholomorphic letters. The crux of the proof is the identity $\hat{S}(f_p)=\tilde f_p$ relating the antipode of a ladder integral to a combination of lower ladders weighted by powers of $L=\log z\log\bar z$. The determinant of the matrix $\Phi_{ij}=\tilde f_{i+j-1}$ is then shown, by purely combinatorial row operations, to have vanishing $L$-derivative; since setting $L=0$ turns $\tilde f_p$ into $f_p$, the determinant equals $\phi_m$, proving $\hat{S}(\phi_m)=\phi_m$. The argument closes with an identity for the coefficients of the two polynomials $P^{(1)}_{p,l}$ and $P^{(2)}_{p,l}$ that encode both sides of the ladder identity, evaluated with a hypergeometric regularization and a generalized Vandermonde identity.

What would settle it

Evaluate both sides of the ladder identity $\hat{S}(f_p)=\tilde f_p$ for $p=3$ at a generic complex $z$ with $\bar z$ held fixed, using the complete Appendix B expressions that retain every power of $2\pi i$; any nonzero difference between the two functions would invalidate the identity and, with it, equation (13).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is equation (13): for every integer $m$, the single-valued polylogarithmic function $\phi_m$ that represents the square fishnet integral satisfies $\hat{S}(\phi_m)=\phi_m$, where $\hat{S}=CS$ is the twisted antipode. The proof runs through the ladder-determinant representation $\phi_{m,n}=\det(f_{n-m+i+j-1})$ and the identity $\hat{S}(f_p)=\tilde f_p = \sum_{k=0}^{p-1}\binom{p-1}{k} L^k f_{p-k}$ with $L=\log z\log\bar z$. Because $\tilde f_p$ contains the non-single-valued factor $L$, the transformed determinant $\det\Phi$ with $\Phi_{ij}=\tilde f_{i+j-1}$ is not manifestly equal to $\phi_m$; the paper shows by row-and-column operations that $\partial_L \det\Phi=0$, so the $L$-dependence cancels and the determinant collapses to $\det(f_{i+j-1})=\phi_m$. The appendices supply a complete proof of the ladder identity that retains all powers of $(2\pi i)^2$, upgrading the main-text argument that only establishes it modulo such terms.

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the ladder-determinant formula for fishnet integrals is valid for every grid size $m$, so the physical $m\times m$ integral is exactly the determinant of ladder functions on which the combinatorial argument operates.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Antipodal self-duality holds for the entire infinite family of square fishnet graphs, for all $m$, at function level; no higher-loop conjecture remains for this class.
The symmetry is proved for the full single-valued functions, including all $(2\pi i)^2$ corrections, not only for their symbols.
Non-square fishnet integrals $\phi_{m,n}$ with $n\neq m$ are not antipodally self-dual under this map, so the square case is special.
The same determinant-and-ladder technology, combined with the Steinmann relations, singles out a unique infinite family of quadratic polynomials in ladder integrals (equation (30)) that are antipodally self-dual; these may correspond to new physical observables.
The result strengthens the case that antipodal self-duality is a general phenomenon in planar gauge theory, since it now appears in a solvable, integrable setting where it can be examined exactly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Beyond the paper: the determinant proof may generalize to other determinant-valued correlators, such as the large-$R$-charge correlators in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM, which share the ladder-determinant structure; testing $\hat{S}$-invariance there would be a direct next step.
Beyond the paper: the explicit form of the kinematic map on symbol letters (conjugate holomorphic, conjugate-and-invert antiholomorphic) suggests a geometric interpretation in terms of swapping $z$ with $1/\bar z$; if this map is canonical, the same twisted antipode might govern other single-valued functions with the same alphabet.
Beyond the paper: the combinatorial mechanism — a determinant whose transformed entries differ by $L$-dependent terms, with the $L$-dependence cancelling in the determinant — may explain why the symmetry appears at function level for fishnets but only at symbol level for amplitudes.
Beyond the paper: one could numerically check the identity (13) for $m=4$ or $5$ with high precision in the Euclidean region, which would test the proof independently of the symbolic manipulations.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The short version: this letter proves that every square fishnet graph φ_m is invariant under the twisted antipode Ŝ = C S at function level. That is a genuinely new all-order result. Previous cases were low-loop MHV form factors at symbol level, or two loops at function level. Here it is done for all m, and the proof is a proof, not a conjecture.

What is good: the two-step structure is clean. The ladder transform (14) is the key new ingredient; the determinant argument in the proof of (13) is purely combinatorial and I see no gap there. The reduction of (14) to a coefficient identity c = d is a standard but nontrivial hypergeometric summation, and the authors spell out the Gamma-function cases. The paper is honest: it says the function L introduces non-single-valued behavior for ladders, and it checks non-square fishnets numerically/coproduct-wise.

Soft spots. The stress-test concern is real: Appendix B is the load-bearing part, and it is terse. The limit ϵ→0 in the regularized hypergeometric sum (B.15) involves several case distinctions, and the final closed form (B.18) is asserted after saying 'expanding all Γ functions to leading order' – I would want to see a few boundary cases checked carefully. Also, the generalized Vandermonde identity (B.20) comes from an arXiv preprint; the parameter values used here should be verified to satisfy its assumptions. These are referee-level checks, not signs of a flawed argument; the authors did the work, they just did not machine-check it. Reliance on the Basso-Dixon determinant representation is safe because it is cited to multiple independent proofs.

Bottom line: the central claim holds up. The proof is complete modulo standard theorems and a careful re-derivation of one summation. The paper deserves a serious referee. I would send it to a strong hep-th referee who knows hypergeometric identities and polylogarithms. I would cite it in my own work.

Referee Report

0 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proves that square fishnet integrals phi_m in four-dimensional conformal fishnet theory are invariant under the antipodal map S-hat = C S, where S is the antipode of the Hopf algebra of multiple polylogarithms and C is the kinematic conjugation map defined in Eq. (8). The proof proceeds in two steps. First, Appendix B establishes the ladder-transform identity S-hat(f_p) = f-tilde_p of Eq. (14), reducing it to the equality of two sets of polynomial coefficients c_{p,l,r} = d_{p,l,r}, which is proven by hypergeometric summation and a generalized Vandermonde identity. Second, using the Basso-Dixon determinant representation (5), the paper shows by a purely combinatorial determinant argument that the twisted antipode of phi_m equals phi_m for every grid size m. The result is a function-level self-duality, not merely a symbol-level statement.

Significance. If correct, this is the first proof of antipodal self-duality for an infinite family of Feynman integrals, valid for all m, rather than a check at low loop orders. The proof is self-contained modulo standard results (the determinant representation and hypergeometric identities), and the key coefficient equality is stated explicitly, which makes the verification straightforward. The paper also identifies polynomial families in ladder integrals with the same self-duality, which may be of independent interest. The clarity of the main argument and the completeness of the appendices give strong evidence that antipodal self-duality is a structural property of certain polylogarithmic observables and not an accident of low orders.

minor comments (4)

[Antipodal self-duality, Eq. (14)] The symbol L is used for two different functions: in Eq. (6) L is -log(z zbar), while in Eq. (14) L is log z log zbar. This overloading is confusing because the proof of Eq. (13) uses the derivative with respect to the second L while the determinant entries f_p depend on the first. Please use a distinct symbol, for example cal L, for the product of logarithms in Eq. (14) and throughout the proof.
[Appendix B, around Eqs. (B.16)-(B.18)] In the first bullet after Eq. (B.16), the range p <= r <= 2p - l should be p < r <= 2p - l: at r = p, the factor Gamma(1+p-r+2 epsilon) is O(epsilon^0), not O(epsilon^{-1}). As written, the two bullets overlap at r = p and give conflicting statements; the second bullet and the final formula (B.18) are correct, so this is a presentation issue, but it should be fixed.
[Appendix B, Eq. (B.20)] The generalized Vandermonde identity is applied with N = r + l - p, which can be negative in the relevant parameter range. Please state the domain of validity of Eq. (B.20), or note explicitly that it extends to this range by continuity using the standard Gamma-function convention for factorials.
[Discussion] The statement that non-square fishnet integrals are not antipodally self-dual 'for any kinematic map' is based on checks of explicit examples; this universal phrasing is stronger than the evidence presented. Suggest rewording to 'for the kinematic map considered here, in all cases we checked.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the proof is self-contained modulo the externally proven determinant representation and standard hypergeometric identities.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, Eq. (13), is proven from two ingredients: the determinant representation (5) and the ladder transform (14). The determinant representation is an input theorem, not an encoding of the target: the paper states 'It was conjectured [26], and later proven [27–29]', and the proofs in Refs. [27,28] are by Derkachov and Olivucci, independent of the current authors, so the self-citations in [26,29] are not load-bearing. Equation (14) is proved in Appendix B by a direct coefficient match: the coefficients c_{p,l,r} of That{S}(f_p) are evaluated via a regulated hypergeometric sum in (B.10)-(B.18), while the coefficients d_{p,l,r} of the right-hand side are evaluated using the generalized Vandermonde identity (B.20) from Ref. [50]; the equality (B.21) is a concrete polynomial identity and does not assume (13). The subsequent determinant argument in 'Proof of (13)' is purely combinatorial: it treats f_p and L as independent formal variables, shows ∂_L det Φ = 0 by row operations, and then sets L=0 so that det Φ reduces to ϕ_m. No parameter is fitted and no prediction is forced by construction. The skeptical concerns about the Γ-function limits in Appendix B and the cited Vandermonde identity are correctness risks, not circularity, because they do not reduce the claimed self-duality to its own statement.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to data. The derivation relies on established determinant and Hopf-algebra results, with one external combinatorial identity quoted from Ref. [50]. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Square fishnet integrals admit the determinant representation ϕ_{m,n} = det(f_{n-m+i+j-1}) (Eq. (5)).
Proven in Refs. [27-29] cited by the paper, not re-derived; the proof of (13) starts from this representation.
standard math The antipode acts on logarithms and classical polylogarithms as in Eq. (7).
Standard result of the Hopf algebra on multiple polylogarithms, cited to Goncharov [15]; used throughout Appendix B.
domain assumption Ladder integrals are single-valued combinations of holomorphic and antiholomorphic polylogarithms in the region where z and āz are complex conjugates.
Cites Refs. [32-34]; needed for the map C and for the function-level statement.
standard math Generalized Vandermonde identity (B.20) quoted from Ref. [50].
Used to evaluate the coefficient sum d_{p,l,r}; quoted from an arXiv preprint and not proved in this paper.
domain assumption Conformal invariance reduces fishnet integrals to functions of two cross ratios z and āz (Eq. (2)).
Cites Ref. [1]; needed to identify ϕ_{m,m} with a function of z and āz.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Antipodal self-duality of square fishnet graphs." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FKQD4BVV

@misc{pith2026250200862,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Antipodal self-duality of square fishnet graphs},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FKQD4BVV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00862}
}

abstract

In strongly-deformed planar ${\cal N}=4$ super-Yang-Mills theory, or fishnet theory, a point-split single-trace correlation function of four dimension-$m$ scalar operators is given by a single Feynman integral, which involves integrating over locations of a $m\times m$ grid of points. We show that for any integer $m$ this square fishnet graph is invariant under the combined action of a kinematic map and the antipode map of the Hopf algebra on multiple polylogarithms, i.e. it possesses an antipodal self-duality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00862 by the authors.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[1]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, V. A. Smirnov, and E. Sokatchev, Magic identities for conformal four-point integrals, JHEP 01 (2007) 064, [ hep-th/0607160]

arXiv 2007
[2]

Z. Bern, M. Czakon, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, and V. A. Smirnov, The Four-Loop Planar Amplitude and Cusp Anomalous Dimension in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085010, [ hep-th/0610248]

arXiv 2007
[3]

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling , JHEP 06 (2007) 064, [arXiv:0705.0303]

arXiv 2007
[4]

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, and D. A. Kosower, Maximally supersymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 125020, [arXiv:0705.1864]

arXiv 2007
[5]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality, Nucl. Phys. B 795 (2008) 52–68, [arXiv:0709.2368]

arXiv 2008
[6]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes , Nucl. Phys. B 826 (2010) 337–364, [ arXiv:0712.1223]

arXiv 2010
[7]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B 828 (2010) 317–374, [ arXiv:0807.1095]

arXiv 2010
[8]

J. M. Drummond, J. M. Henn, and J. Plefka, Yangian symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 05 (2009) 046, [arXiv:0902.2987]

arXiv 2009

Show all 50 references

[9]

Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83 (1977), no

K.-T. Chen, Iterated path integrals, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 83 (1977), no. 5 831–879

1977
[10]

A. B. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives, math/0103059

arXiv
[11]

A. B. Goncharov, M. Spradlin, C. Vergu, and A. Volovich, Classical Polylogarithms for Amplitudes 6 and Wilson Loops , Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010) 151605, [arXiv:1006.5703]

2010 arXiv
[12]

C. Duhr, H. Gangl, and J. R. Rhodes, From polygons and symbols to polylogarithmic functions , JHEP 10 (2012) 075, [ arXiv:1110.0458]

2012 arXiv
[13]

Duhr, Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes , JHEP 08 (2012) 043, [arXiv:1203.0454]

C. Duhr, Hopf algebras, coproducts and symbols: an application to Higgs boson amplitudes , JHEP 08 (2012) 043, [arXiv:1203.0454]

2012 arXiv
[14]

F. C. Brown, Mixed Tate motives over Z, Annals of Mathematics 175 (2012) 949–976, [ arXiv:1102.1312]

2012 arXiv
[15]

Goncharov, Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry, Duke Math

A. Goncharov, Galois symmetries of fundamental groupoids and noncommutative geometry, Duke Math. J. 128 (2005) 209, [ math/0208144]

2005 arXiv
[16]

Caron-Huot, L

S. Caron-Huot, L. J. Dixon, J. M. Drummond, F. Dulat, J. Foster, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, M. von Hippel, A. J. McLeod, and G. Papathanasiou, The Steinmann Cluster Bootstrap for N = 4 Super Yang-Mills Amplitudes , PoS CORFU2019 (2020) 003, [ arXiv:2005.06735]

2020 arXiv
[17]

L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Bootstrapping a stress-tensor form factor through eight loops , JHEP 07 (2022) 153, [arXiv:2204.11901]

2022 arXiv
[18]

L. J. Dixon and Y.-T. Liu, An eight loop amplitude via antipodal duality, JHEP 09 (2023) 098, [arXiv:2308.08199]

2023 arXiv
[19]

Basso, L

B. Basso, L. J. Dixon, and A. G. Tumanov, The three-point form factor of Tr ϕ3 to six loops , JHEP 02 (2025) 034, [ arXiv:2410.22402]

2025 arXiv
[20]

L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, Y.-T. Liu, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Antipodal Self-Duality for a Four-Particle Form Factor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (2023), no. 11 111601, [ arXiv:2212.02410]

2023 arXiv
[21]

L. J. Dixon and S. Xin, A two-loop four-point form factor at function level , JHEP 01 (2025) 012, [arXiv:2411.01571]

2025
[22]

L. J. Dixon, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, A. J. McLeod, and M. Wilhelm, Folding Amplitudes into Form Factors: An Antipodal Duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (2022), no. 11 111602, [arXiv:2112.06243]

2022 arXiv
[23]

Arkani-Hamed and E

N. Arkani-Hamed and E. Y. Yuan, One-Loop Integrals from Spherical Projections of Planes and Quadrics , arXiv:1712.09991

arXiv
[24]

G¨ urdo˘ gan and V

O. G¨ urdo˘ gan and V. Kazakov,New Integrable 4D Quantum Field Theories from Strongly Deformed Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory , Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 20 201602, [ arXiv:1512.06704]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 117, 259903 (2016)]

2016 arXiv
[25]

Caetano, O

J. Caetano, O. G¨ urdo˘ gan, and V. Kazakov,Chiral limit of N = 4 SYM and ABJM and integrable Feynman graphs, JHEP 03 (2018) 077, [ arXiv:1612.05895]

2018 arXiv
[26]

Basso and L

B. Basso and L. J. Dixon, Gluing Ladder Feynman Diagrams into Fishnets , Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), no. 7 071601, [ arXiv:1705.03545]

2017 arXiv
[27]

Derkachov and E

S. Derkachov and E. Olivucci, Exactly solvable magnet of conformal spins in four dimensions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 125 (2020), no. 3 031603, [ arXiv:1912.07588]

2020 arXiv
[28]

Derkachov and E

S. Derkachov and E. Olivucci, Exactly solvable single-trace four point correlators in χCFT4, JHEP 02 (2021) 146, [ arXiv:2007.15049]

2021 arXiv
[29]

Basso, L

B. Basso, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, A. Krajenbrink, and D.-l. Zhong, Fishnet four-point integrals: integrable representations and thermodynamic limits , JHEP 07 (2021) 168, [ arXiv:2105.10514]

2021 arXiv
[30]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, An Approach to the evaluation of three and four point ladder diagrams , Phys. Lett. B 298 (1993) 363–370

1993
[31]

N. I. Usyukina and A. I. Davydychev, Exact results for three and four point ladder diagrams with an arbitrary number of rungs , Phys. Lett. B 305 (1993) 136–143

1993
[32]

D. Ramakrishnan, Analogs of the Bloch-Wigner function for higher polylogarithms , in Applications of algebraic K-theory to algebraic geometry and number theory, Part I, II (Boulder, Colo., 1983) , vol. 55 of Contemp. Math. , pp. 371–376. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1986

1983
[33]

Wojtkowiak, A construction of analogs of the Bloch-Wigner function, Math

Z. Wojtkowiak, A construction of analogs of the Bloch-Wigner function, Math. Scand. 65 (1989), no. 1 140–142

1989
[34]

Zagier, Polylogarithms, Dedekind zeta functions and the algebraic K-theory of fields , in Arithmetic algebraic geometry (Texel, 1989) , vol

D. Zagier, Polylogarithms, Dedekind zeta functions and the algebraic K-theory of fields , in Arithmetic algebraic geometry (Texel, 1989) , vol. 89 of Progr. Math., pp. 391–430. Birkh¨ auser Boston, Boston, MA, 1991

1989
[35]

Brown, Notes on motivic periods , Commun

F. Brown, Notes on motivic periods , Commun. Number Theory Phys. 11 (2017), no. 3 557–655, [arXiv:1512.06410]

2017 arXiv
[36]

Remiddi and J

E. Remiddi and J. A. M. Vermaseren, Harmonic polylogarithms, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 15 (2000) 725–754, [hep-ph/9905237]

2000 arXiv
[37]

Liu, Antipodal symmetry of two-loop MHV amplitudes, JHEP 09 (2022) 131, [ arXiv:2207.11815]

Y.-T. Liu, Antipodal symmetry of two-loop MHV amplitudes, JHEP 09 (2022) 131, [ arXiv:2207.11815]

2022 arXiv
[38]

A. C. Petkou, Thermal one-point functions and single-valued polylogarithms, Phys. Lett. B 820 (2021) 136467, [arXiv:2105.03530]

2021 arXiv
[39]

Karydas, S

M. Karydas, S. Li, A. C. Petkou, and M. Vilatte, Conformal Graphs as Twisted Partition Functions , Phys. Rev. Lett. 132 (2024), no. 23 231601, [arXiv:2312.00135]

2024 arXiv
[40]

F. C. Brown, Single-valued multiple polylogarithms in one variable , C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris, Ser. I 338 (2004) 527

2004
[41]

F. C. Brown, Single-valued hyperlogarithms and unipotent differential equations, 2004

2004
[42]

L. J. Dixon, C. Duhr, and J. Pennington, Single-valued harmonic polylogarithms and the multi-Regge limit , JHEP 10 (2012) 074, [ arXiv:1207.0186]

2012 arXiv
[43]

Brown, Single-valued Motivic Periods and Multiple Zeta Values, SIGMA 2 (2014) e25, [ arXiv:1309.5309]

F. Brown, Single-valued Motivic Periods and Multiple Zeta Values, SIGMA 2 (2014) e25, [ arXiv:1309.5309]

2014 arXiv
[44]

Del Duca, S

V. Del Duca, S. Druc, J. Drummond, C. Duhr, F. Dulat, R. Marzucca, G. Papathanasiou, and B. Verbeek, Multi-Regge kinematics and the moduli space of Riemann spheres with marked points , JHEP 08 (2016) 152, [ arXiv:1606.08807]

2016 arXiv
[45]

Coronado, Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops, Phys

F. Coronado, Bootstrapping the Simplest Correlator in Planar N = 4 Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory to All Loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), no. 17 171601, [arXiv:1811.03282]

2020 arXiv
[46]

Caron-Huot and F

S. Caron-Huot and F. Coronado, Ten dimensional symmetry of N = 4 SYM correlators , JHEP 03 (2022) 151, [arXiv:2106.03892]

2022 arXiv
[47]

Steinmann, ¨Uber den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und der retardierten Kommutatoren, Helv

O. Steinmann, ¨Uber den Zusammenhang zwischen den Wightmanfunktionen und der retardierten Kommutatoren, Helv. Physica Acta 33 (1960) 257

1960
[48]

Steinmann, Wightman-Funktionen und retardierten Kommutatoren

O. Steinmann, Wightman-Funktionen und retardierten Kommutatoren. II, Helv. Physica Acta 33 (1960) 347

1960
[49]

K. E. Cahill and H. P. Stapp, Optical theorems and Steinmann relations, Annals Phys. 90 (1975) 438

1975
[50]

Saeed Naghibi and M

S. Saeed Naghibi and M. Hooshmand, A Generaliszation of Chu-Vandermonde’s Identity , arXiv:2209.02588. 7 APPENDIX A. Proof of (19) We present here the straightforward derivation of (19): (z∂z + ¯z∂ ¯z)fp = 2pX j=p (p − 1)!j! (j − p)!(2p − j)! L2p−j Lij−1(z) − 2(2p − j)L2p−j−1 ...

arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, V. A. Smirnov, and E. Sokatchev, Magic identities for conformal four-point integrals, JHEP 01 (2007) 064, [ hep-th/0607160]

arXiv 2007

[2] [2]

Z. Bern, M. Czakon, L. J. Dixon, D. A. Kosower, and V. A. Smirnov, The Four-Loop Planar Amplitude and Cusp Anomalous Dimension in Maximally Supersymmetric Yang-Mills Theory, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 085010, [ hep-th/0610248]

arXiv 2007

[3] [3]

L. F. Alday and J. M. Maldacena, Gluon scattering amplitudes at strong coupling , JHEP 06 (2007) 064, [arXiv:0705.0303]

arXiv 2007

[4] [4]

Z. Bern, J. J. M. Carrasco, H. Johansson, and D. A. Kosower, Maximally supersymmetric planar Yang-Mills amplitudes at five loops , Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 125020, [arXiv:0705.1864]

arXiv 2007

[5] [5]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, On planar gluon amplitudes/Wilson loops duality, Nucl. Phys. B 795 (2008) 52–68, [arXiv:0709.2368]

arXiv 2008

[6] [6]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Conformal Ward identities for Wilson loops and a test of the duality with gluon amplitudes , Nucl. Phys. B 826 (2010) 337–364, [ arXiv:0712.1223]

arXiv 2010

[7] [7]

J. M. Drummond, J. Henn, G. P. Korchemsky, and E. Sokatchev, Dual superconformal symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super-Yang-Mills theory , Nucl. Phys. B 828 (2010) 317–374, [ arXiv:0807.1095]

arXiv 2010

[8] [8]

J. M. Drummond, J. M. Henn, and J. Plefka, Yangian symmetry of scattering amplitudes in N=4 super Yang-Mills theory, JHEP 05 (2009) 046, [arXiv:0902.2987]

arXiv 2009