Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 2 cited by

Finite-key feasibility of geostationary quantum key distribution

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Geostationary satellite quantum key distribution achieves positive secret key rates with finite-key decoy-state BB84 protocols despite high loss and noise.

desk verdict This is a competent but incremental feasibility study on GEO QKD that applies finite-key bounds and cloud data to generate practical yield estimates rather than introducing new methods. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.29706 v1 pith:FNUPFM3X submitted 2026-05-28 quant-ph

Vaisakh Mannalath , Víctor Zapatero , Marcos Curty This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords quantumkeydistributiongeostationarysatellitesfinite-keyanalysisdecoy-stateBB84satellitedownlinksecretratechannelmodelingcloudcover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper conducts an end-to-end feasibility analysis of quantum key distribution from geostationary satellites using a decoy-state BB84 protocol in the downlink. It incorporates variable-length finite-key security analysis and tight statistical bounds while modeling realistic channel losses and background noise that vary with cloud cover and environment. The study evaluates performance across rural, urban, and coastal settings at multiple wavelengths and forecasts annual secret-key yields over Europe from historical cloud data. It maps the high-dimensional parameter space to reveal trade-offs and bottlenecks that set the boundaries of workable operation. The findings supply concrete operating thresholds and design guidelines for missions seeking continuous continental-scale secure links.

What carries the argument

The physically realistic channel model that captures dominant loss and noise mechanisms, paired with finite-key security analysis applied to principal receiver architectures in the GEO downlink configuration.

What would settle it

An actual GEO satellite QKD experiment that measures secret key rates falling below the calculated positive thresholds in the modeled rural, urban, or coastal scenarios would disprove the feasibility.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Incorporating variable-length finite-key security and tight statistical bounds into the decoy-state BB84 protocol expands the positive-key regime for GEO downlink QKD, making it feasible under a physically realistic channel model that includes extreme loss, variable cloud cover, and background noise across environments and wavelengths.

Load-bearing premise

The channel model accurately captures the dominant loss and noise mechanisms including variable cloud cover and background noise levels across environments.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Positive secret key rates become achievable in rural, urban, and coastal environments at visible Fraunhofer minima and telecom wavelengths.
  • Annual secret-key yields across Europe can be forecasted from historical cloud data.
  • Systematic mapping of the parameter space identifies the key trade-offs and performance bottlenecks that govern feasibility.
  • Practical operating thresholds and actionable design guidelines emerge for future GEO-QKD missions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Confirmation would favor GEO platforms for continuous coverage rather than relying solely on low-Earth-orbit constellations.
  • The thresholds could directly shape choices of wavelength, receiver design, and operational windows in mission planning.
  • Sensitivity tests against unmodeled extremes such as prolonged cloud cover would strengthen or limit the forecasts.
  • Hybrid systems linking GEO downlinks to ground fiber networks could extend secure reach beyond single-satellite footprints.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript conducts a comprehensive end-to-end feasibility study of decoy-state BB84 QKD in a GEO satellite downlink. It incorporates variable-length finite-key security analysis with tight statistical bounds, a physically realistic channel model for loss and noise (including variable cloud cover), and historical cloud data to forecast annual secret-key yields across Europe in rural, urban, and coastal settings at multiple wavelengths. The work systematically explores the high-dimensional parameter space to identify trade-offs, performance bottlenecks, and practical operating thresholds for future missions.

Significance. If the calculations are accurate, the results provide actionable design guidelines and operating thresholds for GEO-QKD systems under realistic conditions, including daylight operation. The combination of finite-key analysis with environmental forecasting using historical data is a strength that enhances the practical relevance of the feasibility claims.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'variable-length finite-key security and tight statistical bounds' would benefit from a parenthetical reference to the specific bound family (e.g., 'using the variable-length analysis of Ref. X') to allow readers to locate the exact security proof immediately.
  2. The manuscript should explicitly state the range of free parameters explored (channel loss, background rates, finite-key block sizes) and whether any were tuned post hoc to achieve positive key rates; this would strengthen the independence of the reported thresholds.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough summary and positive evaluation of the manuscript, including the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were listed in the report, so we have no individual points requiring detailed rebuttal or clarification at this stage. We will incorporate the minor revisions suggested by the editor and referee in the next version of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper is a standard feasibility analysis applying the decoy-state BB84 protocol with finite-key bounds to a channel model and historical cloud data for yield forecasting. All reported thresholds and trade-offs follow directly from applying the stated models and data to the parameter space; no step reduces by construction to a fitted input renamed as prediction, self-definitional relation, or load-bearing self-citation chain. The central claims remain independent of the inputs once the model and data are accepted.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central feasibility claims rest on standard QKD security assumptions plus numerous modeled channel parameters whose values are chosen or fitted to represent rural, urban, and coastal conditions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • channel loss and background noise rates
    Values for atmospheric loss, cloud attenuation, and detector noise are selected or fitted per environment and wavelength to produce the reported key rates.
  • finite-key statistical parameters
    Block sizes, failure probabilities, and smoothing parameters in the variable-length finite-key analysis are chosen to expand the positive-key regime.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Decoy-state BB84 with finite-key analysis yields secure keys against general attacks when the observed statistics satisfy the stated bounds.
    Invoked throughout the end-to-end study as the security foundation.
  • domain assumption Historical cloud data and standard atmospheric models are representative of future operating conditions.
    Used to forecast annual yields across Europe.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Finite-key feasibility of geostationary quantum key distribution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FNUPFM3X

@misc{pith2026260529706,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Finite-key feasibility of geostationary quantum key distribution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FNUPFM3X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.29706}
}
read the original abstract

Quantum key distribution (QKD) via geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) satellites offers a compelling route to continuous, continental-scale secure communications. However, operation in this regime entails extreme channel loss and significant background noise, particularly if daylight operation is desired. We present a comprehensive end-to-end feasibility study of a decoy-state BB84 protocol in a GEO downlink configuration, incorporating variable-length finite-key security and tight statistical bounds to expand the achievable positive-key regime. Our analysis encompasses the principal receiver architectures relevant to downlink QKD and employs a physically realistic channel model that captures the dominant loss and noise mechanisms. We evaluate performance across rural, urban, and coastal environments at multiple wavelengths, including visible Fraunhofer absorption minima and the telecom band. Using historical cloud data across Europe, we forecast the annual secret-key yield across the continent. Through a systematic exploration of the high-dimensional parameter space, we identify key trade-offs and performance bottlenecks that determine feasibility. These results establish practical operating thresholds and provide actionable design guidelines for future GEO-QKD missions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.29706 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Finite-size secret-key rate ℓ/N for an asymmetric active BB84 receiver as a function of total system loss (x axis) and noise-click probability pnoise (y axis). The color map and black contour lines show the finite-size secret-key rate. Columns correspond to misalignment values of 0% and 3%, while rows correspond to afterpulsing probabilities of 0% and 2%. corrected coherence length grow approximately in propor￾tion … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. System loss (dB) as a function of receiver aperture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Combined loss and performance map as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (21 more)
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: makes the finite-size cost explicit for the default urban daytime architecture with aT = 0.75 m, aR = 1.5 m, and low AO correction. It is the block-size counterpart of the preceding daytime feasibility plots: channels that are admissible in the loss-noise and zenith-an…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Geographic map of the cloud-weighted annual secret [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Secret-key length ℓ (y axis) versus ground arc distance darc (x axis), both on logarithmic scales, for the two signal wavelengths shown in the panel titles, λ = 854.445 nm and λ = 1550.027 nm. In each panel, the colored solid and dashed curves give the urban nighttime…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Finite-size secret-key rate ℓ/N (y axis) versus overall system loss (x axis) for asymmetric active, asymmetric passive, and symmetric passive BB84 receiver architectures. The three subfigures correspond, respectively, to background￾noise probabilities pnoise = 10−7 , …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Geometry of the satellite-to-ground downlink sce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Cross-sectional geometry used to derive the max [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Local ENU geometry used in the azimuth derivation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Spot radius at the ground (y axis) versus zenith [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Climatological mean fraction of time for different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Loss-budget decomposition with loss in dB (y [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_17.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Spectral radiance (y axis) versus the full moon’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_19.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: shows the background noise as a function of the sites, detectors, and illumination conditions. At night, the lowest points are set by detector dark counts, so the SNSPD cases sit well below the APD cases, but as the daylight background rises the curves bunch together …
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Spectral radiance (top, y axis) and atmospheric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_20.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: fixes the site and receiver aperture and varies daytime noise and transmitter aperture. For 656.448 and 854.445 nm, increasing the daytime background mainly acts by pulling the zenith cutoff leftward; the rate level at small zenith angles changes less dramatically tha…
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: System loss (dB) as a function of receiver aperture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_22.png]
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Finite-size secret-key rate ℓ/N (y axis) versus zenith angle (x axis) as a function of the bandwidth of the AO under nighttime operation at fixed apertures aT = 0.75 m and aR = 1.5 m, with SMF coupling and Spec B detectors. Rows correspond to rural, urban, and coastal…
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: Annual finite-size secret-key volume (y axis) versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p041_26.png]
Figure 28
Figure 28. Figure 28: System loss (dB) as a function of the receiver [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_28.png]
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: Finite-size secret-key rate ℓ/N as a function of total system loss (x axis, including receiver optics/filter and detector efficiency) and noise-click probability pnoise per de￾tector per gate (y axis, log scale) for an asymmetric active receiver assuming the default f…
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: Finite-size secret-key rate ℓ/N as a function of receiver aperture aR (x axis) and transmitter aperture aT (y axis) for the default urban geometry with θ = 60◦ , low AO correction (fc = 130 Hz), SMF coupling, and an SNSPD Spec B receiver. The color map and black conto…
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: Finite-key rate ℓ/N (y axis) versus the number of transmission rounds N (x axis), with both axes on logarith￾mic scales, for the default urban link with fixed transmitter aperture aT = 0.75 m, receiver aperture aR = 1.5 m, low AO correction (fc = 130 Hz), SMF coupling…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum Key Distribution Beyond Stationary Channels

    quant-ph 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    New interval-mixture martingale bounds give robust non-IID concentration inequalities that reduce the required number of satellite-QKD signals by up to ~70% under channel-loss mismatch.

  2. Finite-key security analysis of decoy-state QKD with source and detector imperfections

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Analytical finite-key security proof for decoy-state QKD that incorporates state-preparation flaws, bit/basis side-channel leakage and correlations, intensity fluctuations, and detection-efficiency mismatches.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

163 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    These effects increase the apparent beam radius at the receiver beyond its diffraction-limited value [80]

    Turbulence This refers to irregular variations in the atmospheric refractive index, driven by temperature gradients, wind shear, pressure and humidity fluctuations, which per- turb the propagation of optical waves. These effects increase the apparent beam radius at the receiver beyond its diffraction-limited value [80]. In a satellite-to-ground downlink s...

  2. [2]

    Even with perfect alignment, a significant fraction of the transmitted beam power may fall outside the finite receiver aperture

    Geometric loss Geometric loss, often referred to as aperture truncation loss, occurs because the optical beam spreads due to diffraction and atmospheric turbulence as it propagates. Even with perfect alignment, a significant fraction of the transmitted beam power may fall outside the finite receiver aperture. Assuming a circularly symmetric Gaussian inten...

  3. [3]

    This misalignment reduces the effective power coupled into the system

    Pointing loss Pointing loss arises from the residual mechanical jitter of the transmitter, which causes random displacements of the beam centroid relative to the center of the receiver aperture [82]. This misalignment reduces the effective power coupled into the system. Modeling the pointing error as a Gaussian random vari- able with radial standard devia...

  4. [4]

    1 + aR r0 5/3#−6/5 ,(H34) wherer 0 is the Fried coherence parameter, given by r0 =

    Coupling loss The coupling loss quantifies the fraction of transmitted optical power that falls outside the receiver field of view (FOV) and is not coupled into the detection system. In a free-space optical (FSO) receiver, the FOV defines the angular region over which the detector collects the in- coming light. The choice of FOV directly determines the tr...

  5. [5]

    In this framework, AO correction is modeled as an effective enhancement of the Fried coherence value from its uncorrected valuer0 to a closed-loop corrected value rCL 0 > r0

    Adaptive optics compensation Adaptive optics (AO) systems are implemented to re- duce turbulence-induced phase distortions by actively correcting phase aberrations across the receiver aperture [86]. In this framework, AO correction is modeled as an effective enhancement of the Fried coherence value from its uncorrected valuer0 to a closed-loop corrected v...

  6. [6]

    We note that the MODTRAN radiative transfer code [98] provides an alternative, widely used implementation with comparable capabilities

    Absorption/scattering loss To model the channel loss arising from atmospheric ab- sorption and scattering processes, we employ a radiative transfer code, via thelibRadtran package [55, 56]. We note that the MODTRAN radiative transfer code [98] provides an alternative, widely used implementation with comparable capabilities. Both codes offer suites of stan...

  7. [7]

    Overall system loss Combining all the effects detailed so far, the overall transmittance ηsys of the satellite downlink system is given by ηsys =η geoηpηcplηatmηRηD,(H44) where ηR denotes the total internal transmittance of the receiver subsystem excluding the single-photon detectors. This term captures the aggregate efficiency of the tele- scope optics (...

  8. [8]

    Background noise This subsection gives the explicit calculation of the mean background-photon level¯nB and the derived noise- click probability pnoise that define the nighttime and day- time noise scenarios used in Sec. V. For a receiver with angular field of viewΩFOV, using a detector within a temporal window∆t and a spectral filter of bandwidth∆λ center...

Show all 163 references
  1. [9]

    These scenarios are characterized by their altitude, visibility conditions, and atmospheric turbulence profiles, as summarized in Table II

    Locations To assess the feasibility of GEO-QKD under diverse operational conditions, we consider three representative locations for the OGS that span a practical range of atmo- spheric environments. These scenarios are characterized by their altitude, visibility conditions, an...

  2. [10]

    Wavelengths Wefocusonthreerepresentativewavelengths: 656.448nm (Hα line), 854.445 nm (Ca II line), and 1550.027 nm (C- band representative). The first two lie on prominent Fraunhofer lines in the solar spectrum, where the Sun it- self is significantly dimmer because a substant...

  3. [11]

    We consider Si APDs for visible and near-infrared wave- lengths, InGaAs/InP APDs for telecom wavelengths, and SNSPDs across the spectrum

    Single-photon detection The performance of a satellite-to-ground QKD link critically depends on the receiver’s detection hardware. We consider Si APDs for visible and near-infrared wave- lengths, InGaAs/InP APDs for telecom wavelengths, and SNSPDs across the spectrum. A compar...

  4. [12]

    Misalignment Extensiveexperimentalandtheoreticalworkhasdemon- strated effective approaches for mitigating polarization misalignment in satellite-based QKD systems. In theMi- ciusmissions, active polarization control was implemented using reference laser pulses to monitor the e...

  5. [13]

    27–32, we present an expanded version of some of the figures presented in the main text

    Index of Expanded Main-Text Figures Finally, in Figs. 27–32, we present an expanded version of some of the figures presented in the main text. In particular, Figure 27 extends Fig. 1 by adding a1%mis- alignment column and a1%afterpulsing row. Figure 28 extends Fig. 3 by adding...

  6. [14]

    C. H. Bennett and G. Brassard, Quantum cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing, Theor. Comput. Sci.560, 7 (2014), originally published in Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, 1984

    2014

  7. [15]

    A. K. Ekert, Quantum cryptography based on Bell’s theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 661 (1991)

    1991

  8. [16]

    H.-K. Lo, M. Curty, and K. Tamaki, Secure quantum key distribution, Nat. Photonics8, 595 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Pirandola, U

    S. Pirandola, U. L. Andersen, L. Banchi, M. Berta, D. Bunandar, R. Colbeck, D. Englund, T. Gehring, C. Lupo, C. Ottaviani,et al., Advances in quantum cryptography, Adv. Opt. Photonics12, 1012 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    F. Xu, X. Ma, Q. Zhang, H.-K. Lo, and J.-W. Pan, Secure quantum key distribution with realistic devices, Rev. Mod. Phys.92, 025002 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    H.-K. Lo, H. F. Chau, and M. Ardehali, Efficient quan- tum key distribution scheme and a proof of its uncondi- tional security, J. Cryptol.18, 133 (2005)

    2005

  12. [20]

    Liuet al., 1002 km twin-field quantum key distribu- tion with finite-key analysis, Quantum Frontiers2, 16 (2023)

    Y. Liuet al., 1002 km twin-field quantum key distribu- tion with finite-key analysis, Quantum Frontiers2, 16 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    J. S. Sidhu, S. K. Joshi,et al., Advances in space quan- tum communications, IET Quantum Commun.2, 182 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Bedington, J

    R. Bedington, J. M. Arrazola, and A. Ling, Progress in satellite quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf.3, 30 (2017)

    2017

  15. [23]

    Liao, W.-Q

    S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, W.-Y. Liu, L. Zhang, Y. Li, J.-G. Ren, J. Yin, Q. Shen, Y. Cao, Z.-P. Li,et al., Satellite- to-ground quantum key distribution, Nature549, 43 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Liao, W.-Q

    S.-K. Liao, W.-Q. Cai, J. Handsteiner, B. Liu, J. Yin, L. Zhang, D. Rauch, M. Fink, J.-G. Ren, W.-Y. Liu, et al.,Satellite-relayedintercontinentalquantumnetwork, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 030501 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Hwang, Quantum key distribution with high loss: Toward global secure communication, Phys

    W.-Y. Hwang, Quantum key distribution with high loss: Toward global secure communication, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 057901 (2003)

    2003

  18. [26]

    H.-K. Lo, X. Ma, and K. Chen, Decoy state quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 230504 (2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    Wang, Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography, Phys

    X.-B. Wang, Beating the photon-number-splitting attack in practical quantum cryptography, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 230503 (2005)

    2005

  20. [28]

    Li, S.-K

    Y. Li, S.-K. Liao, Y. Cao, J.-G. Ren, W.-Y. Liu, J. Yin, Q. Shen, J.-C. Qiang, S. Zhang, A.-L. Jia,et al., Microsatellite-based real-time quantum key distribution, Nature640, 47 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Liao, H.-L

    S.-K. Liao, H.-L. Yong, C. Liu, G.-L. Shentu, D.-D. Li, J. Lin, H. Dai, S.-Q. Zhao, B. Li, J.-Y. Guan,et al., Long- distance free-space quantum key distribution in daylight towards inter-satellite communication, Nat. Photonics 11, 509 (2017)

    2017

  22. [30]

    Avesani, L

    M. Avesani, L. Calderaro, M. Schiavon, A. Stanco, C. Ag- nesi, A. Santamato, M. Zahidy, A. Scriminich, G. Fo- letto, G. Contestabile,et al., Full daylight quantum-key- distribution at 1550 nm enabled by integrated silicon photonics, npj Quantum Inf.7, 93 (2021)

    2021

  23. [31]

    W.-Q. Cai, Y. Li, B. Li, J.-G. Ren, S.-K. Liao, Y. Cao, L. Zhang, M. Yang, J.-C. Wu, Y.-H. Li,et al., Free-space quantum key distribution during daylight and at night, Optica11, 647 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bourgoin, E

    J.-P. Bourgoin, E. Meyer-Scott, B. L. Higgins, B. Helou, C. Erven, H. Hübel, B. Kumar, D. Hudson, I. D’Souza, R. Girard,et al., A comprehensive design and perfor- mance analysis of low Earth orbit satellite quantum communication, New J. Phys.15, 023006 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    J. S. Sidhu, T. Brougham, D. McArthur, R. G. Pousa, and D. K. Oi, Finite key performance of satellite quan- tum key distribution under practical constraints, Com- mun. Phys.6, 210 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Vasylyev, W

    D. Vasylyev, W. Vogel, and F. Moll, Satellite-mediated quantum atmospheric links, Phys. Rev. A99, 053830 (2019)

    2019

  27. [35]

    Liege, P

    T. Liege, P. Lognoné, M. Schiavon, C. B. Lim, J.-M. Co- nan, E. Diamanti, and D. Dequal, Analysis of untrusted- node quantum key distribution from a geostationary satellite, Quantum Sci. Technol.11, 025002 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    Xin, China’s new Dawn: Pan Jianwei reveals high- orbit quantum satellite for global network, South China Morning Post (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-01-16]

    L. Xin, China’s new Dawn: Pan Jianwei reveals high- orbit quantum satellite for global network, South China Morning Post (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-01-16]. Announcement at 2024 Zhongguancun Forum, Beijing

    2025

  29. [37]

    Dirks, I

    B. Dirks, I. Ferrario, A. Le Pera, D. V. Finocchiaro, M. Desmons, D. de Lange, H. de Man, A. J. Meskers, J. Morits, N. M. Neumann,et al., GEOQKD: quantum key distribution from a geostationary satellite, inInter- national Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2020, Vol. 11852 (SPIE, ...

    2020

  30. [38]

    W. Klop, R. Saathof, N. Doelman, M. Gruber, T. Moens, C. I. O. Tamayo, and C. Duque, QKD optical ground terminal developments, inInternational Conference on Space Optics—ICSO 2020, Vol. 11852 (SPIE, 2021) p. 388

    2020

  31. [39]

    Hispasat, Hispasat and ESA agree to develop the first QKD system combining the delivery of quantum keys from GEO and LEO orbits (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  32. [40]

    A. Abad, P. Pintó, F. Cuervo, Á. Álvaro, L. Pascual, J. C. Gil, V. Gaspar, J. Autrán, L. F. Rodríguez, M. Reyes García-Talavera, L. Trigo Vidarte, V. Pruneri, D. Domingo, M. I. García, A. Álvarez-Herrero, T. Be- lenger, V. Fernandez, P. Arteaga-Díaz, D. Cano, J. Sanz, C. Mirav...

    2022

  33. [41]

    Alvaro, L

    A. Alvaro, L. Pascual, T. Colombo, M. Guerault, and V. Giner, GARBO QKD GEO: challenges and ar- chitecture, inInternational Conference on Space Op- tics—ICSO 2024, Vol. 13699 (SPIE, 2025) p. 1527

    2024

  34. [42]

    Pirandola, Satellite quantum communications: Fun- damental bounds and practical security, Phys

    S. Pirandola, Satellite quantum communications: Fun- damental bounds and practical security, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023130 (2021)

    2021

  35. [43]

    Pirandola, Limits and security of free-space quantum communications, Phys

    S. Pirandola, Limits and security of free-space quantum communications, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013279 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Günthner, I

    K. Günthner, I. Khan,et al., Quantum-limited measure- ments of optical signals from a geostationary satellite, Optica4, 611 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    C. C. W. Lim, M. Curty, N. Walenta, F. Xu, and H. Zbinden, Concise security bounds for practical decoy- state quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. A89, 022307 46 (2014)

    2014

  38. [46]

    R. J. Serfling, Probability inequalities for the sum in sampling without replacement, Ann. Stat.2, 39 (1974)

    1974

  39. [47]

    Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J

    W. Hoeffding, Probability inequalities for sums of bounded random variables, J. Am. Stat. Assoc.58, 13 (1963)

    1963

  40. [48]

    Curty, F

    M. Curty, F. Xu, W. Cui, C. C. W. Lim, K. Tamaki, and H.-K. Lo, Finite-key analysis for measurement-device- independent quantum key distribution, Nat. Commun. 5, 3732 (2014)

    2014

  41. [49]

    Zhang, Q

    Z. Zhang, Q. Zhao, M. Razavi, and X. Ma, Improved key-rate bounds for practical decoy-state quantum-key- distribution systems, Phys. Rev. A95, 012333 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Attema, J

    T. Attema, J. W. Bosman, and N. M. Neumann, Opti- mizing the decoy-state BB84 QKD protocol parameters, Quantum Inf. Process.20, 154 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    Bancal and P

    J.-D. Bancal and P. Sekatski, Simple Buehler-optimal confidence intervals on the average success probabil- ity of independent Bernoulli trials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.12558 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Mannalath, V

    V. Mannalath, V. Zapatero, and M. Curty, Sharp finite statistics for quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 020803 (2025)

    2025

  45. [53]

    Mannalath, V

    V. Mannalath, V. Zapatero, and M. Curty, Elementary Tail Bounds on the Hypergeometric Distribution, arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.19726 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Tomamichel, C

    M. Tomamichel, C. C. W. Lim, N. Gisin, and R. Renner, Tight finite-key analysis for quantum cryptography, Nat. Commun.3, 634 (2012)

    2012

  47. [55]

    Phys.14, 093014 (2012)

    M.HayashiandT.Tsurumaru,Conciseandtightsecurity analysis of the Bennett–Brassard 1984 protocol with finite key lengths, New J. Phys.14, 093014 (2012)

    1984

  48. [56]

    Tupkary, S

    D. Tupkary, S. Nahar, P. Sinha, and N. Lütkenhaus, Phase error rate estimation in QKD with imperfect de- tectors, Quantum9, 1937 (2025)

    1937

  49. [57]

    Tupkary, E

    D. Tupkary, E. Y.-Z. Tan, and N. Lütkenhaus, Security proof for variable-length quantum key distribution, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023002 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Z. Wang, D. Tupkary, and S. Nahar, Phase error esti- mation for passive detection setups with imperfections and memory effects, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.21486 (2025)

    2025

  51. [59]

    Tzallas, A

    V. Tzallas, A. Hünerbein, M. Stengel, J. F. Meirink, N. Benas, J. Trentmann, and A. Macke, CRAAS: a European cloud regime dAtAset based on the CLAAS- 2.1 climate data record, Remote Sens.14, 5548 (2022)

    2022

  52. [60]

    Wright,Exact confidence bounds when sampling from small finite universes: an easy reference based on the hypergeometric distribution, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol

    T. Wright,Exact confidence bounds when sampling from small finite universes: an easy reference based on the hypergeometric distribution, Lecture Notes in Statistics, Vol. 66 (Springer New York, 1991)

    1991

  53. [61]

    A. E. Siegman,Lasers(University Science Books, 1986)

    1986

  54. [62]

    A. E. Siegman, Defining, measuring, and optimizing laser beam quality, SPIE Proceedings1868, 2 (1993)

    1993

  55. [63]

    R.HufnagelandN.Stanley,Modulationtransferfunction associated with image transmission through turbulent media, J. Opt. Soc. Am.54, 52 (1964)

    1964

  56. [64]

    G. C. Valley, Isoplanatic degradation of tilt correction and short-term imaging systems, Appl. Opt.19, 574 (1980)

    1980

  57. [65]

    J. W. Hardy,Adaptive optics for astronomical telescopes, Vol. 16 (Oxford University Press, USA, 1998)

    1998

  58. [66]

    C. J. Pugh, J.-F. Lavigne, J.-P. Bourgoin, B. L. Higgins, and T. Jennewein, Adaptive optics benefit for quantum key distribution uplink from ground to a satellite, Adv. Opt. Technol.9, 263 (2020)

    2020

  59. [67]

    R. N. Lanning, M. A. Harris, D. W. Oesch, M. D. Oliker, and M. T. Gruneisen, Quantum communication over atmospheric channels: a framework for optimizing wave- length and filtering, Phys. Rev. Appl.16, 044027 (2021)

    2021

  60. [68]

    C. Emde, R. Buras-Schnell, A. Kylling, B. Mayer, J. Gasteiger, U. Hamann, J. Kylling, B. Richter, C. Pause, T. Dowling,et al., The libRadtran software package for radiative transfer calculations (version 2.0.1), Geosci. Model Dev.9, 1647 (2016)

    2016

  61. [69]

    Mayer and A

    B. Mayer and A. Kylling, Technical note: The libRad- tran software package for radiative transfer calculations - description and examples of use, Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 1855 (2005)

    2005

  62. [70]

    United States Committee on Extension to the Standard Atmosphere,US standard atmosphere, 1976(National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1976)

    1976

  63. [71]

    E. P. Shettle and R. W. Fenn,Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the effects of humidity varia- tions on their optical properties, AFGL Technical Report AFGL-TR-79-0214 (Air Force Geophysics Laboratory, Air Force Systems Command, United States Air Force, Hansco...

    1979

  64. [72]

    E. P. Shettle, Models of aerosols, clouds, and precipita- tion for atmospheric propagation studies, inAtmospheric Propagation in the UV, Visible, IR and MM-Wave Re- gion and Related Systems Aspects, AGARD Conference Proceedings No. 454 (Advisory Group for Aerospace Re- search ...

    1990

  65. [73]

    Finkensieper, J

    S. Finkensieper, J. F. Meirink, G.-J. van Zadelhoff, T. Hanschmann, N. Benas, M. Stengel, P. Fuchs, R. Holl- mann, J. Kaiser, and M. Werscheck, CLAAS-2.1: CM SAFCLoudpropertydAtAsetusingSEVIRI-Edition2.1 (2020), dataset, Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring (CM...

    2020

  66. [74]

    ESO, Sky Model Calculator (n.d.), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2026

  67. [75]

    S. Noll, W. Kausch, M. Barden, A. Jones, C. Szyszka, S. Kimeswenger, and J. Vinther, An atmospheric radi- ation model for Cerro Paranal-I. The optical spectral range, Astron. Astrophys.543, A92 (2012)

    2012

  68. [76]

    Jones, S

    A. Jones, S. Noll, W. Kausch, C. Szyszka, and S.Kimeswenger,Anadvancedscatteredmoonlightmodel for Cerro Paranal, Astron. Astrophys.560, A91 (2013)

    2013

  69. [77]

    J. S. Sidhu, T. Brougham, D. McArthur, R. G. Pousa, and D. K. L. Oi, Finite key effects in satellite quantum key distribution, npj Quantum Inf.8, 18 (2022)

    2022

  70. [78]

    Pirandola, R

    S. Pirandola, R. Laurenza, C. Ottaviani, and L. Banchi, Fundamental limits of repeaterless quantum communi- cations, Nat. Commun.8, 15043 (2017)

    2017

  71. [79]

    Pirandola, End-to-end capacities of a quantum com- munication network, Commun

    S. Pirandola, End-to-end capacities of a quantum com- munication network, Commun. Phys.2, 51 (2019)

    2019

  72. [80]

    Azuma, S

    K. Azuma, S. E. Economou, D. Elkouss, P. Hilaire, L. Jiang, H.-K. Lo, and I. Tzitrin, Quantum repeaters: From quantum networks to the quantum internet, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 045006 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    For our simulations, we setλEC = 1.16nZ h(eZ), where eZ is set to the expected quantum bit error rate (QBER) of the channel

    In practice, the users determineλEC as a function of the observed data. For our simulations, we setλEC = 1.16nZ h(eZ), where eZ is set to the expected quantum bit error rate (QBER) of the channel

  74. [82]

    C. E. Bonferroni, Teoria statistica delle classi e calcolo delle probabilità, Pubblicazioni del R. Istituto Superiore 47 di Scienze Economiche e Commerciali di Firenze8, 3 (1936)

    1936

  75. [83]

    Soler and D

    T. Soler and D. W. Eisemann, Determination of look angles to geostationary communication satellites, J. Surv. Eng.120, 115 (1994)

    1994

  76. [84]

    S. D. Ilcev, Satellite look angles, track and geometry in mobile satellite communications, in2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT)(IEEE, 2016) pp. 4505–4513

    2016

  77. [85]

    C. M. R. Fowler,The solid earth: an introduction to global geophysics(Cambridge University Press, 1990)

    1990

  78. [86]

    Hofmann-Wellenhof and H

    B. Hofmann-Wellenhof and H. Moritz,Physical Geodesy, 2nd ed. (Springer, Vienna, 2006)

    2006

  79. [87]

    J. R. Wertz, D. F. Everett, and J. J. Puschell, eds., Space Mission Engineering: The New SMAD(Micro- cosm Press, Hawthorne, CA, 2011)

    2011

  80. [88]

    J.SanzSubirana, J.M.JuanZornoza,andM.Hernández- Pajares, Transformations between ECEF and ENU co- ordinates, Navipedia, European Space Agency (2011), [Online; accessed 2026-04-21]

    2011

  81. [89]

    CrystaLaser, Inc., Compact Red Laser 656.5 nm Series (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-11-04]

    2025

  82. [90]

    M Squared Lasers Ltd., SolsTiS CW Ti:Sapphire Laser (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-11-04]

    2025

  83. [91]

    Menhir Photonics AG, MENHIR-1550 Series Femtosec- ond Laser (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-11-04]

    2025

  84. [92]

    W. L. Stutzman and G. A. Thiele,Antenna theory and design, 3rd ed. (John Wiley & Sons, 2012)

    2012

  85. [93]

    L. C. Andrews and R. L. Phillips,Laser Beam Prop- agation through Random Media, 2nd ed. (SPIE Press, 2005)

    2005

  86. [94]

    Vasylyev, A

    D. Vasylyev, A. Semenov, W. Vogel, K. Günthner, A. Thurn, Ö. Bayraktar, and C. Marquardt, Free-space quantum links under diverse weather conditions, Phys. Rev. A96, 043856 (2017)

    2017

  87. [95]

    P. V. Trinh, A. Carrasco-Casado, H. Takenaka, M. Fu- jiwara, M. Kitamura, M. Sasaki, and M. Toyoshima, Statistical verifications and deep-learning predictions for satellite-to-ground quantum atmospheric channels, Commun. Phys.5, 225 (2022)

    2022

  88. [96]

    A. K. Majumdar,Optical Wireless Communications for Broadband Global Internet Connectivity: Fundamentals and Potential Applications(Elsevier, 2018)

    2018

  89. [97]

    Born and E

    M. Born and E. Wolf,Principles of Optics: Electromag- netic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light, 7th ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    1999

  90. [98]

    J. W. Goodman,Introduction to Fourier Optics, 3rd ed. (Roberts & Company, 2005)

    2005

  91. [99]

    R. K. Tyson and B. W. Frazier,Principles of Adaptive Optics, 5th ed. (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2022)

    2022

  92. [100]

    D. J. Schroeder,Astronomical optics, 2nd ed. (Elsevier, 1999)

    1999

  93. [101]

    M. T. Gruneisen, B. A. Sickmiller, M. B. Flanagan, J. P. Black, K. E. Stoltenberg, and A. W. Duchane, Adaptive spatial filtering of daytime sky noise in a satellite quan- tum key distribution downlink receiver, Opt. Eng.55, 026104 (2016)

    2016

  94. [102]

    R. J. Sasiela,Electromagnetic wave propagation in tur- bulence: evaluation and application of Mellin transforms, Springer Series on Wave Phenomena, Vol. 18 (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1994) XVII, 300 pp

    1994

  95. [103]

    Roddier, The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy, Prog

    F. Roddier, The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy, Prog. Opt.19, 281 (1981)

    1981

  96. [104]

    Shaklan and F

    S. Shaklan and F. Roddier, Coupling starlight into single- mode fiber optics, Appl. Opt.27, 2334 (1988)

    1988

  97. [105]

    Coudé du Foresto, Integrated optics in astronomical interferometry, inVery High Angular Resolution Imag- ing, Vol

    V. Coudé du Foresto, Integrated optics in astronomical interferometry, inVery High Angular Resolution Imag- ing, Vol. 158 (1994) pp. 261–271

    1994

  98. [106]

    Jovanovic, C

    N. Jovanovic, C. Schwab, O. Guyon, J. Lozi, N. Cveto- jevic, F. Martinache, S. Leon-Saval, B. Norris, S. Gross, D. Doughty,et al., Efficient injection from large tele- scopes into single-mode fibres: Enabling the era of ultra-precision astronomy, Astron. Astrophys.604, A122 (2017)

    2017

  99. [107]

    Scriminich, G

    A. Scriminich, G. Foletto, F. Picciariello, A. Stanco, G. Vallone, P. Villoresi, and F. Vedovato, Optimal design and performance evaluation of free-space quantum key distribution systems, Quantum Sci. Technol.7, 045029 (2022)

    2022

  100. [108]

    V. M. Acosta,Quantum Key Distribution through atmo- spheric turbulence: secure satellite-to-ground links, Ph.D. thesis, Sorbonne Université (2023)

    2023

  101. [109]

    Fidler and O

    F. Fidler and O. Wallner, Application of single-mode fiber-coupled receivers in optical satellite to high-altitude platform communications, EURASIP J. Wireless Com- mun. Netw.2008, 864031 (2008)

    2008

  102. [110]

    D. P. Greenwood, Bandwidth specification for adaptive optics systems, J. Opt. Soc. Am.67, 390 (1977)

    1977

  103. [111]

    A. Berk, P. Conforti, R. Kennett, T. Perkins, F. Hawes, and J. van den Bosch, MODTRAN®6: A major up- grade of the MODTRAN®radiative transfer code, in 2014 6th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS) (IEEE, 2014) pp. 1–4

    2014

  104. [112]

    NOAA Aviation Weather Center, METAR Data Service (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-01-16]

    2025

  105. [113]

    Mannalath, Atmospheric and cloud data inputs (2026)

    V. Mannalath, Atmospheric and cloud data inputs (2026)

    2026

  106. [114]

    Liorni, H

    C. Liorni, H. Kampermann, and D. Bruß, Satellite-based links for quantum key distribution: beam effects and weather dependence, New J. Phys.21, 093055 (2019)

    2019

  107. [115]

    C.-Y. Lu, Y. Cao, C.-Z. Peng, and J.-W. Pan, Micius quantum experiments in space, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 035001 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    Thorlabs, Inc., Tunable Narrow Bandpass Fabry-Perot Filters (FPQFA / FPQSA Series) (2025), [Online; ac- cessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  109. [117]

    Alluxa, Inc., 656.4-0.1 OD4 Ultra Narrow Bandpass Filter (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-11-06]

    2025

  110. [118]

    Alluxa, Inc., 854-0.75 OD6 Ultra Narrow Bandpass Filter (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  111. [119]

    Alluxa, Inc., 1550.6-1.8 OD4 Ultra Narrow Bandpass Filter (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  112. [120]

    OptiGrate Corp., Quantum Technologies (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  113. [121]

    Lumeau, V

    J. Lumeau, V. Smirnov, A. Glebov, and L. B. Glebov, Ultra-narrow bandpass filters based on volume Bragg grating technologies, inPhotonics in the Transportation Industry: Auto to Aerospace III, Vol. 7675 (SPIE, 2010) p. 118

    2010

  114. [122]

    Exail, Ultra narrow bandwidth filters (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-10-28]

    2025

  115. [123]

    R. L. Kurucz, Synthetic infrared spectra, inInfrared Solar Physics(Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 1994) pp. 523–531

    1994

  116. [124]

    Abasifard, C

    M. Abasifard, C. Cholsuk, R. G. Pousa, A. Kumar, A. Zand, T. Riel, D. K. Oi, and T. Vogl, The ideal wave- 48 length for daylight free-space quantum key distribution, APL Quantum1, 016113 (2024)

    2024

  117. [125]

    Rogers, J

    D. Rogers, J. C. Bienfang, A. Mink, B. Hershman, A. Nakassis, X. Tang, L. Ma, D. Su, C. J. Williams, and C. W. Clark, Free-space quantum cryptography in the H-alpha Fraunhofer window, inFree-Space Laser Communications VI, Vol. 6304 (SPIE, 2006) p. 296

    2006

  118. [126]

    Tomaello, C

    A. Tomaello, C. Bonato, V. Da Deppo, G. Naletto, and P. Villoresi, Link budget and background noise for satel- lite quantum key distribution, Adv. Space Res.47, 802 (2011)

    2011

  119. [127]

    R. J. Hughes, J. E. Nordholt, D. Derkacs, and C. G. Peterson, Practical free-space quantum key distribution over 10 km in daylight and at night, New J. Phys.4, 43 (2002)

    2002

  120. [128]

    M. P. Peloso, I. Gerhardt, C. Ho, A. Lamas-Linares, and C. Kurtsiefer, Daylight operation of a free space, entanglement-based quantum key distribution system, New J. Phys.11, 045007 (2009)

    2009

  121. [129]

    Ko, K.-J

    H. Ko, K.-J. Kim, J.-S. Choe, B.-S. Choi, J.-H. Kim, Y. Baek, and C. J. Youn, Experimental filtering effect on the daylight operation of a free-space quantum key distribution, Sci. Rep.8, 15315 (2018)

    2018

  122. [130]

    Hearne, J

    S. Hearne, J. Horgan, N. Boujnah, and D. Kilbane, Wave- length selection for satellite quantum key distribution, Applied Sciences15, 1308 (2025)

    2025

  123. [131]

    B. A. Bodhaine, N. B. Wood, E. G. Dutton, and J. R. Slusser,OnRayleighopticaldepthcalculations,J.Atmos. Oceanic Technol.16, 1854 (1999)

    1999

  124. [132]

    Liou,An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, 2nd ed., International Geophysics Series, Vol

    K.-N. Liou,An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, 2nd ed., International Geophysics Series, Vol. 84 (Aca- demic Press, San Diego, CA, 2002)

    2002

  125. [133]

    LASER COMPONENTS, Single Photon Counting Mod- ule COUNT®Series Datasheet (2023), version V32, July 2023

    2023

  126. [134]

    LASER COMPONENTS, Single Photon Counter – Tim- ing Module COUNT®T-Series Datasheet (2023), ver- sion V4, 07/23

    2023

  127. [135]

    LASER COMPONENTS, Single Photon Counting Mod- ule COUNT®NIR Series Datasheet (2024), version V21, July 2024

    2024

  128. [136]

    Excelitas Technologies, SPCM-NIR Single-Photon Counting Module (2019), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2019

  129. [137]

    Excelitas Technologies, SPCM-AQRH Single-Photon Counting Module (2019), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2019

  130. [138]

    Thorlabs, Inc., SPDMH2F Single Photon Detection Mod- ule (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  131. [139]

    PicoQuant GmbH, tau-SPAD Single Photon Counting Module (2014), discontinued as of December 2014; [On- line; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2014

  132. [140]

    ID Quantique SA, ID120 featuring up to 80% quantum efficiency (2025), [Online; accessed 2025-11-06]

    2025

  133. [141]

    Anisimova, D

    E. Anisimova, D. Nikulov, S. S. Hu, M. Bourgon, S. P. Neumann, R. Ursin, T. Jennewein, and V. Makarov, A low-noise single-photon detector for long-distance free- space quantum communication, EPJ Quantum Technol. 8, 23 (2021)

    2021

  134. [142]

    ID Quantique SA, ID230 Infrared Single-Photon Detec- tor Datasheet (2023), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2023

  135. [143]

    ID Quantique SA, ID Qube NIR Free-Running Single Photon Detector Datasheet (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  136. [144]

    Korzh, N

    B. Korzh, N. Walenta, T. Lunghi, N. Gisin, and H. Zbinden, Free-running InGaAs single photon detector with 1 dark count per second at 10% efficiency, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 081108 (2014)

    2014

  137. [145]

    L. C. Comandar, B. Fröhlich, J. F. Dynes, A. W. Sharpe, M. Lucamarini, Z. L. Yuan, R. V. Penty, and A. J. Shields, Gigahertz-gated InGaAs/InP single-photon de- tector with detection efficiency exceeding 55% at 1550 nm, J. Appl. Phys.117, 083109 (2015)

    2015

  138. [146]

    Y.-Q. Fang, W. Chen, T.-H. Ao, C. Liu, L. Wang, X.- J. Gao, J. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, InGaAs/InP single- photon detectors with 60% detection efficiency at 1550 nm, Rev. Sci. Instrum.91, 083102 (2020)

    2020

  139. [147]

    Q. Xu, C. Yu, W. Chen, J. Zhao, D. Cui, J. Zhang, and J.-W. Pan, Compact free-running InGaAs/InP single- photon detector with 40% detection efficiency and 2.3 kcps dark count rate, IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Elec- tron.30, 1 (2024)

    2024

  140. [148]

    Z. Yan, D. R. Hamel, A. K. Heinrichs, X. Jiang, M. A. Itzler, and T. Jennewein, An ultra low noise telecom wavelength free running single photon detector using negative feedback avalanche diode, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, 073105 (2012)

    2012

  141. [149]

    Signorelli, F

    F. Signorelli, F. Telesca, E. Conca, A. Della Frera, A. Ruggeri, A. Giudice, and A. Tosi, InGaAs/InP spad detecting single photons at 1550 nm with up to 50% effi- ciency and low noise, in2021 IEEE International Elec- tron Devices Meeting (IEDM)(IEEE, 2021) pp. 20.3.1– 20.3.4

    2021

  142. [150]

    Bouzid, A

    A. Bouzid, A. M. Nahhas, and K. Guedri, InGaAs/InP avalanchephotodiodeforinfraredsinglephotondetection using a time-to-voltage converter, Opt. Commun.328, 37 (2014)

    2014

  143. [151]

    B. Li, Y. Niu, Y. Feng, and X. Chen, Ultra-low dark count InGaAs/InP single photon avalanche diode, Opto- electronics Letters18, 647 (2022)

    2022

  144. [152]

    AUREA Technology SAS, SPD_A_NIR: NIR Single Photon Detector, Dual-Mode Photon Counting Com- plete Solution (2019), champion-grade specifications at 1550 nm; [Online; accessed 2026-03-16]

    2019

  145. [153]

    T. He, X. Yang, Y. Tang, R. Wang, and Y. Liu, High photon detection efficiency InGaAs/InP single photon avalanche diode at 250 K, J. Semicond.43, 102301 (2022)

    2022

  146. [154]

    H. Ye, W. Wang, H. Zhu, C. Liu, R. Bai, J. Zhang, R. Huang, W. Zhao, and Y. Shi, High-performance room temperature InP/InGaAs single-photon detector made by a single diffusion process, Appl. Phys. Lett.126, 262108 (2025)

    2025

  147. [155]

    P. Hu, H. Li, L. You, H. Wang, Y. Xiao, J. Huang, X. Yang, W. Zhang, Z. Wang, and X. Xie, Detecting single infrared photons toward optimal system detection efficiency, Opt. Express28, 36884 (2020)

    2020

  148. [156]

    ID Quantique SA, ID281 Pro Superconducting Nanowire Single-Photon Detector System (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-05-15]

    2025

  149. [157]

    Marsili, V

    F. Marsili, V. B. Verma, J. A. Stern, S. Harrington, A. E. Lita, T. Gerrits, I. Vayshenker, B. Baek, M. D. Shaw, R. P. Mirin, and S. W. Nam, Detecting single infrared photons with 93% system efficiency, Nat. Photonics7, 210 (2013)

    2013

  150. [158]

    Single Quantum, Interleaved SNSPDs Solutions (2025), [Online; accessed 2026-03-16]

    2025

  151. [159]

    Han, H.-L

    X. Han, H.-L. Yong, P. Xu, K.-X. Yang, S.-L. Li, W.- Y. Wang, H.-J. Xue, F.-Z. Li, J.-G. Ren, C.-Z. Peng, et al., Polarizationdesign for ground-to-satellitequantum 49 entanglement distribution, Opt. Express28, 369 (2020)

    2020

  152. [160]

    J. Wu, L. Zhang, J. Jia, T. Wang, R. Shu, Z. He, and J. Wang, Polarization-maintaining design for satellite- based quantum communication terminals, Opt. Express 28, 10746 (2020)

    2020

  153. [161]

    J. Wu, Y. Tan, L. Zhang, Y. Dou, Z. Song, J. Jia, R. Shu, Z. He, and J. Wang, Research on a real-time polarization compensation method for dynamic quantum communication terminals, Opt. Lasers Eng.149, 106794 (2022)

    2022

  154. [162]

    Y. Tan, J. Wang, J. Wu, and Z. He, Real-time polariza- tion compensation method in quantum communication based on channel Muller parameters detection, Commun. Eng.3, 57 (2024)

    2024

  155. [163]

    Khmelev, A

    A. Khmelev, A. Duplinsky, R. Bakhshaliev, E. Ivchenko, L. Pismeniuk, V. Mayboroda, I. Nesterov, A. Chernov, A. Trushechkin, E. Kiktenko,et al., Eurasian-scale ex- perimental satellite-based quantum key distribution with detector efficiency mismatch analysis, Opt. Express32, 11...

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.