Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links
Paper Citation Record · LEDGER
Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2309.16349.
A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.
Coverage vector
One-hop event checks from named stored sources.
Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00
Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.
Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T15:10:18.937297Z
A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.
Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-05-16T14:37:53.591473Z
Reference resolution
0 of 0 outbound references displayed
- verified exact0
- verified fuzzy0
- unresolved0
- parse uncertain0
- malformed identifier0
- metadata mismatch0
External citation measurements
No source-named external measurement is stored.
Outbound references
No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.
Pith citing papers
Observation c013700e-e191-4f0d-acb0-46d5377b63b0 · inbound
A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment cites this paper.
A Roadmap to Pluralistic Alignment Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
Reference 45
- Resolution
- verified exact
- arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-16T14:37:53.592958Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.
Observation af71041c-2a60-4759-af02-fc7b4135293b · inbound
KoBALT: Korean Benchmark For Advanced Linguistic Tasks cites this paper.
KoBALT: Korean Benchmark For Advanced Linguistic Tasks Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
Reference 37
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T15:10:18.937297Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.
Observation c07ab589-2337-441c-99f3-1e134e3650a2 · inbound
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? cites this paper.
Can External Validation Tools Improve Annotation Quality for LLM-as-a-Judge? Human Feedback is not Gold Standard
Reference 14
- Resolution
- unresolved
- no resolver link, observed 2026-08-06T15:02:21.708169Z
Source-reported events for the cited work
Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.