Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Taxonomy of Dark Energy Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.04642 v1 pith:FQIYW3XG submitted 2021-04-09 astro-ph.CO gr-qc

classification astro-ph.COgr-qc
keywords darkenergymodelscomponentmodelobservationalpresencesummarize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The accelerated expansion of the Universe is one of the main discoveries of the past decades, indicating the presence of an unknown component: the dark energy. Evidence of its presence is being gathered by a succession of observational experiments with increasing precision in its measurements. However, the most accepted model for explaining the dynamic of our Universe, the so-called Lambda cold dark matter, face several problems related to the nature of such energy component. This has lead to a growing exploration of alternative models attempting to solve those drawbacks. In this review, we briefly summarize the characteristics of a (non-exhaustive) list of dark energy models as well as some of the most used cosmological samples. Next, we discuss how to constrain each model's parameters using observational data. Finally, we summarize the status of dark energy modeling.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Strong gravitational lensing constraints on interacting dark energy models

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Joint galaxy+cluster strong-lensing data favor Ω_dm0≈0.253 and β≈−0.83 for a q-dependent interacting dark-energy model, implying earlier acceleration (z_t≈2.33) than ΛCDM.

  2. An overview of what current data can (and cannot yet) say about evolving dark energy

    astro-ph.CO 2025-02 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The apparent preference for evolving dark energy depends strongly on which supernova catalog and which BAO survey are used, and is not robust across all independent data combinations.

Pith tools