Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 113 references

Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that edge modes in quantum electromagnetism on compact spacetime regions with boundaries are quantum reference frames for large gauge transformations, allowing every boundary-sensitive observable to be dressed into a gauge

desk verdict Rigorous C*-algebraic framework for semi-local QED on Cauchy lenses; central relativisation construction holds, with deferred regularity and state issues in the periphery. read the letter →

arxiv 2508.20939 v1 pith:FRN3PANC submitted 2025-08-28 math-ph math.MP

Christopher J. Fewster , Daan W. Janssen , Kasia Rejzner This is my paper · ORCID
classification math-phmath.MP MSC 81T0546L6081T13
keywords semi-localobservablesedgemodesquantumreferenceframeslargegaugetransformationsC*-algebrasCauchylensessuperselectionsectorsalgebraicfieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops a C*-algebraic framework for electromagnetism on finite Cauchy lenses—compact spacetime regions bounded by two Cauchy surfaces meeting at a corner—where observables that sense the boundary (edge modes) transform non-trivially under large gauge transformations. Its central claim is that these edge modes can be treated as quantum reference frames: by adding auxiliary surface degrees of freedom and passing to joint observables invariant under the diagonal large-gauge action, one obtains a relativisation map that dresses any semi-local observable into a gauge-invariant one. This dressing is state-independent because it is defined directly between C*-algebras, unlike earlier operational quantum-reference-frame constructions. The paper also classifies superselection sectors of the joint invariant algebra by external electric flux, and uses the relativisation map to glue two lens algebras sharing a corner. If correct, the framework gives a rigorous way to include boundary-sensitive observables in algebraic QFT and provides a concrete algebraic mechanism for gluing quantum field theories across common boundaries.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the relativisation map ¥ : A(N) → Â_LG(N), defined as the quantisation of the symplectic embedding that sends each bulk gauge orbit [A] to [A] ⊕ (0 ⊕ n∂Σ nΣ dA) in the fusion product of the electromagnetic phase space with the surface-field phase space. The surface-field algebra A^∂(Σ) = Weyl(V^S(Σ)) provides the quantum reference frame; joint large-gauge automorphisms αLG ⊗ α^∂_LG act diagonally, and their invariant subalgebra Â_LG(N) is characterised by Theorem 5.4. The machinery also includes the Cauchy–Hodge–Helmholtz decomposition that splits observables into closed-loop (bulk) and surface (edge-mode) sectors, and a superselection criterion selecting sectors b

What would settle it

Find a faithful Fock representation of the surface-field algebra for which the map λ ↦ π(W^∂(λ⊕0)) fails to be strongly continuous in every W^{2,s} Sobolev topology on the large-gauge group; then Theorem 5.11's identification of the algebraic relativisation map as the strong limit of finite-dimensional POVM relativisation maps would be false for that representation, even though the algebraic map itself might survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the boundary degrees of freedom of quantum electromagnetism on a finite Cauchy lens are not unwanted redundancies but resources: they implement a quantum reference frame for the group of large gauge transformations. Concretely, Theorem 5.4 shows that the algebra of joint large-gauge invariant observables is generated by the relativised image of the semi-local algebra together with unitaries implementing surface gauge transformations, and Corollary 5.7 shows that the original semi-local algebra, its relativised image, and the surface-field extended algebra are all *-isomorphic. Thus every boundary-sensitive observable can be dressed by s

Load-bearing premise

The construction presumes that the quantum surface-field observables are regular enough in the gauge parameter—strongly continuous in a Sobolev topology—so that the algebraic relativisation map emerges as the limit of finite-dimensional covariant measurement maps; the paper states this condition but does not prove it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Boundary-sensitive semi-local observables can be dressed by surface degrees of freedom into joint large-gauge invariant observables, without picking a state.
  • The original semi-local algebra, the relativised algebra, and the surface-field extended algebra are all *-isomorphic, so the two descriptions carry the same physical information.
  • Superselection sectors of the joint invariant algebra are labelled by external electric flux functions; internal fluxes are not superselected because semi-local observables interpolate between them.
  • Two lens algebras sharing a corner can be glued into a joint invariant algebra whose parameterisations are given by relativisation maps, providing a state-gluing procedure for compatible quasi-free states.
  • Whenever the regularity hypotheses hold, the algebraic relativisation map is the strong limit of relativisation maps built from finite-dimensional principal quantum reference frames.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same symplectic decomposition and surface-field extension can be built for non-abelian gauge theories or gravity, the algebraic QRF construction here suggests a template for treating their edge modes as state-independent reference frames too.
  • The regularity assumption on the surface-field representation is the natural place to test the operational reading: if it fails for physically important representations, the algebraic relativisation map may still be valid while its POVM-based reconstruction does not apply.
  • The gluing construction gives a concrete algebraic meaning to 'closing up' smeared Wilson lines across a shared corner, which could be used to quantify boundary contributions to entanglement entropy or relative entropy in gauge subsystems.
  • A direct testable next step would be to construct Hadamard states on the semi-local algebra and check whether the relativisation map preserves them; a positive result would make the dressing procedure compatible with renormalised perturbation theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an algebraic framework for semi-local quantum electrodynamics on compact 'finite Cauchy lenses', i.e. Lorentzian manifolds with boundaries and a codimension-2 corner. Classically, it constructs the reduced covariant phase space and proves a symplectic decomposition into closed-loop and surface (edge-mode) data (Prop. 3.9), and it relates covariant-phase-space and Peierls brackets on local observables (Prop. 3.15). After quantization via a Weyl C*-algebra A(N) (Prop. 4.1) with an explicit L2 Fock representation (Thm. 4.16), the central construction treats auxiliary surface degrees of freedom as a quantum reference frame for large gauge transformations. The relativisation map ¥: A(N) → fA_LG(N) is a state-independent C*-algebraic dressing operation; Thms. 5.4–5.6 and Cor. 5.7 establish that fA_LG(N) is generated by relativised observables and surface-gauge unitaries, and that A(N) ≅ A_rel(N) ≅ A_ext(N). The paper then proposes a superselection criterion (Eq. (5.40)) and proves a classification of sectors satisfying it (Thm. 5.8), gives a POVM-based reconstruction of ¥ under Sobolev regularity assumptions (Thm. 5.11), and applies the formalism to gluing algebras and states across a common corner (Thm. 6.1).

Significance. If the main algebraic assertions are correct, this is a substantial contribution to the rigorous treatment of edge modes and gauge theories with boundaries. The paper's key strength is that the relativisation construction is carried out directly at the C*-algebra level, so the dressing of semi-local observables into gauge-invariant joint observables is state-independent; this is a genuine step beyond earlier von-Neumann-algebraic or representation-dependent QRF constructions. The proofs of Thms. 5.4–5.6 and Cor. 5.7 are concrete and do not rest on the later regularity assumptions; the explicit CHH decomposition and the L2 Fock representation (Thm. 4.16) provide a useful concrete model. The paper is also honest about its limitations: it explicitly states that the L2 vacua are not expected to be Hadamard and defers the existence of Hadamard states to a companion paper [FJR], and it labels Eq. (5.40) as a 'proposed' criterion. These virtues make the central algebraic claim credible.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Def. 2.1] The causal closedness condition is written as 'J±(∠N)=∠N'. Standard terminology 'causally closed' means J^+(S) ∩ J^-(S) = S; the individual equalities J^+(∠N)=∠N and J^-(∠N)=∠N would fail for the Minkowski lens example of §1, where future-directed causal curves leave the corner into the interior. Please correct the statement, presumably to J^+(∠N) ∩ J^-(∠N) = ∠N, and adjust the notation accordingly.
  2. [Thm. 4.16, Eq. (4.64)] The quadratic form µ_L2 contains the term ⟨h,h'⟩_Σ, but h,h' lie in n_{∂Σ}Ω^1_{d*}(Σ) ⊂ Ω^0(∂Σ); the pairing should be ⟨h,h'⟩_{∂Σ}. As written, the formula is undefined. This is evidently a typo, but it occurs in a named theorem and should be fixed.
  3. [Section 5.4, after Thm. 5.11] The statement that 'any faithful Fock representation ... provides an example ... where the required Sobolev continuity holds for the W^{2,0} topology' is asserted but not proved in Appendix E. Appendix E proves Thm. 5.11 conditional on that continuity, but it does not verify it for the L2 representation (nor in general). Please add a proof or explicitly demote this to an assumption. This does not affect Thms. 5.4–5.6 or Cor. 5.7, but it is needed for the POVM reconstruction claim.
  4. [Sec. 5.3, Eq. (5.40)] The superselection criterion (5.40) is proposed rather than derived, and Thm. 5.8 is conditional on it. This is stated in the text, but the wording of the theorem and the conclusions should make the conditional status even more explicit so that readers do not read Thm. 5.8 as an unconditional classification of all sufficiently regular sectors.
  5. [Sec. 4.2, after Thm. 4.16] The paper correctly notes that the L2 Fock states are not expected to satisfy the Hadamard condition and refers to [FJR] for the existence of Hadamard states. Since this is an in-preparation reference, please indicate clearly in the conclusions that the construction of physically regular states remains open in the present paper.
  6. [General] There are a number of typographical slips: 'caonstruct' in §5.2, 'Fut ure' in §7, 'lensens' in the Appendix A table, and 'treatement' in the introduction. These are harmless but should be cleaned up in a revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: central equivalences are proven, not fitted; self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

Walked the derivation chain. The classical decomposition (Prop 3.9), Weyl algebra construction (Prop 4.1), CHH isomorphism (Def 4.5), surface field extension (Prop 5.1), relativisation map (Lem 5.3), and the algebraic isomorphism theorems (Thm 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, Cor 5.7) are established in the text from stated definitions, Hodge/Green-operator tools, and the standard Weyl-algebra functor. The QRF claim is a definitional verification: Def 5.10 generalises the existing operational notion, and Eq (5.57) with Thm 5.4 verify that the constructed map satisfies it; this is a theorem about the defined objects, not a prediction equivalent to its input. The surface-field extension is an explicitly constructed isomorphism, not a hidden input. The superselection classification (Thm 5.8) is explicitly conditional on criterion (5.40) and is proved rather than fitted to a subset of data. The only self-citations ([FJL+25], [FJR]) appear in contextual remarks and in the auxiliary POVM reconstruction of Thm 5.11; the latter also uses the independent Stone-von Neumann theorem, and the C*-algebraic relativisation map plus the central isomorphism chain do not depend on those citations. The post-Thm 5.11 assertion that the L2 representation provides the needed W^{2,0} Sobolev continuity is not proved, and Thm 5.8's completeness direction is conditional on (5.40); these are technical gaps affecting scope and rigour, not circular reductions. No step reduces by construction or by self-citation to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 9 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard analytic and geometric tools imported from the literature (Hodge decomposition, Green operators, Stone-von Neumann, Poincaré duality), on two domain assumptions built into the definition of a Cauchy lens (global hyperbolicity extension, regularity of regions), and on two ad hoc-to-paper modelling choices: the specific content of the surface field extension and the proposed superselection criterion. There are no fitted or empirical free parameters. One genuinely invented entity, the surface field, is introduced as a mathematical device; the paper itself shows it is equivalent to the original phase space, so it is not an independent physical postulate.

assumptions (9)
  • standard math Hodge decomposition for compact Riemannian manifolds with boundary (Lemma 2.2, citing [Sch95, Cor 2.4.9]).
    Used throughout to define the tangential Hodge-Helmholtz decomposition of initial data and the decomposition of boundary functions into tangential co-closed and locally constant parts; underpins V_C(Σ), V_S(Σ), and Prop C.3.
  • standard math Existence and uniqueness of retarded/advanced Green operators for the wave operator on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, imported through the globally hyperbolic extension of a Cauchy lens (Prop 3.10, citing [BGP07, Cor 3.4.3]).
    The Pauli-Jordan operator and Peierls bracket for local observables, and the characterisation Sol_sc,G(N) = {[G_PJ f]} (Lem 3.17), rely on it.
  • standard math Initial value problem characterisation for Maxwell equations on globally hyperbolic spacetimes, Data_Σ(Sol_J(M)) = {(A,E): -d*_Σ E = n_Σ J}, cited to [Pfe09, BGP07] and adapted in Prop C.1.
    Fundamental to Prop 3.6 (bijection with initial data) and Prop C.3 (identification of the radical G(N)); the adaptation to manifolds with corners is sketched, not proven in the cited sources.
  • standard math Stone-von Neumann uniqueness for regular representations of finite-dimensional Weyl systems (used in Lem E.2, citing [BR97, 5.2.15-16]).
    Constructs the covariant POVMs P_μ on the finite-dimensional spectral subspaces G_μ of the corner Laplacian, giving the operational relativisation maps.
  • standard math Poincaré duality for de Rham cohomology with compact support (Lem D.2, citing [GHV72]).
    Characterises localisability by showing that a form with vanishing pairing against compactly supported co-closed forms is exact.
  • domain assumption Finite Cauchy lenses admit a causally convex isometric embedding into a globally hyperbolic spacetime without boundary (Def 2.1).
    Not proven for the class defined; it is part of the definition. It is needed to import Green operators, the initial value problem, and surface extensions (e.g., Prop 3.10, Lem C.2).
  • domain assumption Regularity conditions on regions U in Prop 4.13 (existence of pre-compact U' and a regular Cauchy surface Σ with Σ \ I(U') a compact manifold with smooth boundaries).
    Needed to prove that localisability coincides with smearing by supported test forms; not established for all regions of interest.
  • ad hoc to paper The surface field phase space is V_S(Σ) with pre-symplectic form (5.1), including the zero-total-charge constraint on τ and covariance under the large gauge action (Sec 5.1).
    This modelling choice determines which degrees of freedom can serve as the frame; it follows [DF16] and is what makes the fusion product reproduce the original phase space (Prop 5.1), so the QRF conclusion is conditional on it.
  • ad hoc to paper The superselection criterion (5.40), restricting to representations whose restriction to A_rel(N) is unitarily equivalent to a fixed representation π, is proposed rather than derived.
    Theorem 5.8 classifies exactly the sectors satisfying this criterion; the paper argues internal fluxes are not superselected, but the criterion itself is a selection rule imposed by the authors.
invented entities (2)
  • Surface field (φ, τ) on the corner ∂Σ
    purpose: Auxiliary canonical pair of a scalar field φ and charge density τ on the corner, added to the electromagnetic phase space; serves as the quantum reference frame for large gauge transformations, and in the gluing section is reinterpreted as the electromagnetic degrees of freedom of the neighbouring region.
    A mathematical device introduced by hand in Sec 5.1 (adapted from [DF16]); it carries no falsifiable prediction of its own, all testable content being equivalent to the original phase space via Prop 5.1. It is not a new particle or force, and the paper itself notes the equivalence with the bulk description.
  • External flux function Φ ∈ L_G∠(N) labelling superselection sectors
    purpose: Label for inequivalent representations of Â_LG(N), interpreted as the electric flux density outside the corner.
    A label defined within the construction (Sec 5.3, Eq (5.39)); its physical interpretation as external flux is proposed, and no experiment is suggested.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FRN3PANC

@misc{pith2026250820939,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Semi-local observables, edge modes and quantum reference frames in quantum electromagnetism: an algebraic approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FRN3PANC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2508.20939}
}
abstract

Boundaries and corners of spacetime play a vital role in understanding physical concepts including entanglement entropy, the infrared problem in QFT and quantum gravity. Standard local quantum field theory struggles to accommodate such boundary-sensitive observables. In this paper we develop an algebraic framework for \emph{semi-local quantum electromagnetism} on finite Cauchy lenses: a class of compact spacetimes with boundaries and corner. At the classical level, we establish a decomposition of the reduced covariant phase space into bulk closed-loop and surface sectors and demonstrate how the covariant phase space approach relates to the Peierls bracket construction commonly used in perturbative algebraic quantum field theory. Upon quantisation, we obtain a Weyl $C^{*}$-algebra of semi-local observables transforming non-trivially under large gauge transformations (those with non-trivial boundary contribution). To recover gauge invariance, we invoke the notion of \emph{quantum reference frames} (QRFs) and construct a relativisation map, where we treat auxiliary surface degrees of freedom as QRFs for the large gauge transformations. The relativisation map is constructed directly on the level of $C^{*}$-algebras, making our construction state-independent. The QRF viewpoint on semi-local observables provides new tools for understanding gauge theories on manifolds with boundary, including the problem of gluing theories on Cauchy lenses with common boundaries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2508.20939 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cross-section of a finite Cauchy lens N. In gauge theories, and in particular in electromagnetism, the presence of boundaries introduces novel degrees of freedom—edge modes or surface degrees of freedom—which are intricately linked to large gauge transformations, i.e., those gauge symmetries that do not vanish at the boundary. These structures play a crucial role in diverse areas such as condensed matter physics, to… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. A colour plot on the Cauchy surface Σ (with one dimension suppressed) for a choice of Λ yielding the Poisson degenerate observable O0([dΛ]) : A 7→ ⟨ 1 , nCE ⟩ Proof. By Prop. 3.15, it is enough to establish the case where ψ = OA′([A ′ ]) for any A′ ∈ SolJ (N) and [A ′ ] ∈ Solsc,G (N). Let [A] ∈ SolJ G (N), then ((ξ([dΛ])∗ − id)OA′([A ′ ]))([A]) = σ(A ′ , dΛ) = 0 (3.77) by (3.75), choosing representatives A ′ ∈ Solsc… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Diagram for Theorem 6.1. In the top line we make use of the identifications A C(Σi) ⊗ A S (Σi) = A (Ni) for i = 1, 2, in the bottom line we have set Ii = ker Γi . isomorphism, there is a unique isomorphism •◦ γ making the lower-right square in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p048_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Closing up Wilson lines by means of relativisation. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p049_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alexander and S

    R. Alexander and S. Alexander. Geodesics in Riemannian Manifolds-with-Boundary . Indiana University Mathematics Journal , 30(4):481--488, 1981. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24893014 jstor:24893014

    arXiv 1981

  2. [2]

    Ashtekar, L

    A. Ashtekar, L. Bombelli, and R. Koul. Phase space formulation of general relativity without a 3+1 splitting. In Y. S. Kim and W. W. Zachary, editors, The Physics of Phase Space Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos Geometric Quantization , and Wigner Function , pages 356--359, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-17894-5_378 doi:10.10...

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-17894-5_378 1987

  3. [3]

    Ammon, A

    M. Ammon, A. Castro, and N. Iqbal. Wilson lines and entanglement entropy in higher spin gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2013(10):110, October 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2013)110 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013)110

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013)110 2013

  4. [4]

    Araujo-Regado , P

    G. Araujo-Regado , P. A. Hoehn, F. Sartini, and B. Tomova. Soft edges: The many links between soft and edge modes, December 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.14548 arXiv:2412.14548 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.14548 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412.14548

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412.14548 2024

  5. [5]

    Abraham, J

    R. Abraham, J. E. Marsden, and T. Ratiu. Manifolds, Tensor Analysis , and Applications , volume 75 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer, New York, NY, 1988. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1029-0 doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1029-0

    doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1029-0 1988

  6. [6]

    Ashtekar and M

    A. Ashtekar and M. Streubel. Symplectic geometry of radiative modes and conserved quantities at null infinity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 376(1767):585--607, January 1997. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1981.0109 doi:10.1098/rspa.1981.0109

    arXiv 1997

  7. [7]

    Barnich and F

    G. Barnich and F. Brandt. Covariant theory of asymptotic symmetries, conservation laws and central charges. Nuclear Physics B , 633(1-2):3--82, June 2002. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0111246 arXiv:hep-th/0111246 , https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00251-1 doi:10.1016/S0550-3213(02)00251-1

    arXiv 2002

  8. [8]

    A. P. Balachandran, L. Chandar, and A. Momen. Edge states in Gravity and Black Hole Physics . Nuclear Physics B , 461(3):581--596, February 1996. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9412019 arXiv:gr-qc/9412019 , https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(95)00622-2 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(95)00622-2

    arXiv 1996

Show all 113 references
  1. [9]

    Buchholz, F

    D. Buchholz, F. Ciolli, G. Ruzzi, and E. Vasselli. The universal C *-algebra of the electromagnetic field. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 106(2):269--285, February 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.06603 arXiv:1506.06603 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-015-0801-y doi:10.100...

    2016 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Benini, C

    M. Benini, C. Dappiaggi, T.-P. Hack, and A. Schenkel. A C *-algebra for quantized principal U (1)-connections on globally hyperbolic Lorentzian manifolds. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 332(1):477--504, November 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.3052 arXiv:1307.3052 ,...

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    P. H. B \'e rard. Spectral Geometry : Direct and Inverse Problems , volume 1207 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0076330 doi:10.1007/BFb0076330

    1986 doi

  4. [12]

    Buchholz and K

    D. Buchholz and K. Fredenhagen. Locality and the structure of particle states. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 84(1):1--54, March 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01208370 doi:10.1007/BF01208370

    1982 doi

  5. [13]

    Brunetti and K

    R. Brunetti and K. Fredenhagen. Microlocal Analysis and Interacting Quantum Field Theories : Renormalization on Physical Backgrounds . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 208(3):623--661, January 2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002200050004 doi:10.1007/s002200050004

    doi

  6. [14]

    Vacuum-like

    M. Brum and K. Fredenhagen. " Vacuum-like " Hadamard states for quantum fields on curved spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 31(2):025024, January 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1307.0482 arXiv:1307.0482 , https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/31/2/025024 doi:10.1088/0264-938...

    2014 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Brunetti, K

    R. Brunetti, K. Fredenhagen, and R. Verch. The generally covariant locality principle -- a new paradigm for local quantum field theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 237(1):31--68, June 2003. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-003-0815-7 doi:10.1007/s00220-003-0815-7

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    a r, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfaeffle. Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization . European Mathematical Society Publishing House, Z \

    C. B \"a r, N. Ginoux, and F. Pfaeffle. Wave Equations on Lorentzian Manifolds and Quantization . European Mathematical Society Publishing House, Z \"u rich, Switzerland, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4171/037 doi:10.4171/037

    2007 doi

  9. [17]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux. Central charges in the canonical realization of asymptotic symmetries: An example from three-dimensional gravity. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 104(2):207--226, January 1986

    1986

  10. [18]

    E. Binz, R. Honegger, and A. Rieckers. Construction and uniqueness of the C *- Weyl algebra over a general pre-symplectic space. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 45(7):2885--2907, July 2004. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1757036 doi:10.1063/1.1757036

    2004 doi

  11. [19]

    S. Bunk, J. MacManus, and A. Schenkel. Lorentzian bordisms in algebraic quantum field theory. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 115(1):16, February 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.01026 arXiv:2308.01026 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-025-01906-3 doi:10.1007/s11005-025-01906-3

    2025 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Borsboom and H

    S. Borsboom and H. Posthuma. Global Gauge Symmetries and Spatial Asymptotic Boundary Conditions in Yang-Mills theory, June 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2502.16151 arXiv:2502.16151 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.16151 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2502.16151

    2025 doi arXiv

  13. [21]

    Bratteli and D

    O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator Algebras and Quantum Statistical Mechanics 1 . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1987. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02520-8 doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02520-8

    1987 doi

  14. [22]

    Bratteli and D

    O. Bratteli and D. W. Robinson. Operator algebras and quantum statistical mechanics. 2 . Texts and Monographs in Physics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 1997. Equilibrium states. Models in quantum statistical mechanics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03444-6 doi:1...

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    S. D. Bartlett, T. Rudolph, and R. W. Spekkens. Reference frames, superselection rules, and quantum information. Reviews of Modern Physics , 79(2):555--609, April 2007. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.79.555 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.79.555

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    A. N. Bernal and M. S \'a nchez. On smooth Cauchy hypersurfaces and Geroch 's splitting theorem. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 243(3):461--470, December 2003. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0306108 arXiv:gr-qc/0306108 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-003-0982-6 doi:10....

    2003 arXiv

  17. [25]

    A. N. Bernal and M. S \'a nchez. Further Results on the Smoothability of Cauchy Hypersurfaces and Cauchy Time Functions . Letters in Mathematical Physics , 77(2):183--197, August 2006. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-006-0091-5 doi:10.1007/s11005-006-0091-5

    2006 doi

  18. [26]

    Buchholz

    D. Buchholz. The physical state space of quantum electrodynamics. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 85(1):49--71, August 1982. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02029133 doi:10.1007/BF02029133

    1982 doi

  19. [27]

    Carette, J

    T. Carette, J. G owacki, and L. D. Loveridge. Operational Quantum Reference Frame Transformations , August 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.14002 arXiv:2303.14002 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.14002 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.14002

    2024 doi arXiv

  20. [28]

    Carrozza and P

    S. Carrozza and P. A. Hoehn. Edge modes as reference frames and boundary actions from post-selection, February 2022. https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.06184 arXiv:2109.06184 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.06184 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2109.06184

    2022 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    P. R. Chernoff and J. E. Marsden. Properties of Infinite Dimensional Hamiltonian Systems , volume 425 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0073665 doi:10.1007/BFb0073665

    1974 doi

  22. [30]

    A. S. Cattaneo and P. Mnev. A note on gluing via fiber products in the (classical) BV-BFV formalism. Journal of Geometry and Physics , 192:104956, October 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.11211 arXiv:2208.11211 , https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomphys.2023.104956 doi:10.1016/j.geo...

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A. S. Cattaneo, P. Mnev, and N. Reshetikhin. Classical BV theories on manifolds with boundary. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 332(2):535--603, December 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0290 arXiv:1201.0290 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-2145-3 doi:10.1007/s0022...

    2014 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Crnkovic

    C. Crnkovic. Symplectic geometry of the covariant phase space. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 5(12):1557, December 1988. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/5/12/008 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/5/12/008

    1988 doi

  25. [33]

    Crnkovic and E

    C. Crnkovic and E. Witten. Covariant description of canonical formalism in geometrical theories. In Three Hundred Years of Gravitation , pages 676--684. Cambridge University Press, 1987

    1987

  26. [34]

    Duetsch and K

    M. Duetsch and K. Fredenhagen. Perturbative Algebraic Field Theory , and Deformation Quantization , January 2001. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0101079 arXiv:hep-th/0101079 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0101079 doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/0101079

    2001 doi arXiv

  27. [35]

    Donnelly and L

    W. Donnelly and L. Freidel. Local subsystems in gauge theory and gravity. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2016(9):102, September 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.04744 arXiv:1601.04744 , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP09(2016)102 doi:10.1007/JHEP09(2016)102

    2016 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Douady and L

    A. Douady and L. H \'e rault. Arrondissement des vari \'e t \'e s \`a coins - Appendice \`a . Commentarii mathematici Helvetici , 48:484--491, 1973

    1973

  29. [37]

    Doplicher, R

    S. Doplicher, R. Haag, and J. E. Roberts. Fields, observables and gauge transformations I . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 13(1):1--23, March 1969. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645267 doi:10.1007/BF01645267

    1969 doi

  30. [38]

    J. Dimock. Algebras of local observables on a manifold. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 77(3):219--228, October 1980. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01269921 doi:10.1007/BF01269921

    1980 doi

  31. [39]

    J. Dimock. Quantized electromagnetic field on a manifold. Reviews in Mathematical Physics , 04(02):223--233, June 1992. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X92000078 doi:10.1142/S0129055X92000078

    1992 doi

  32. [40]

    J. Dixmier. C*-Algebras . Elsevier North Holland, 1977

    1977

  33. [41]

    D. E. Evans and J. T. Lewis. Dilations of Irreversible Evolutions in Algebraic Quantum Theory . Number 24. Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies, Dublin, 1977

    1977

  34. [42]

    B. V. Fedosov. A simple geometrical construction of deformation quantization. Journal of Differential Geometry , 40(2):213--238, January 1994. https://doi.org/10.4310/jdg/1214455536 doi:10.4310/jdg/1214455536

    1994

  35. [43]

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, L. D. Loveridge, K. Rejzner, and J. Waldron. Quantum reference frames, measurement schemes and the type of local algebras in quantum field theory. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 406(1):19, January 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.11973 a...

    2025 arXiv

  36. [44]

    C. J. Fewster, D. W. Janssen, and K. Rejzner. Hadamard states on semi-local observables for quantum electromagnetism. In Preparation

  37. [45]

    Fr \"o hlich, G

    J. Fr \"o hlich, G. Morchio, and F. Strocchi. Infrared problem and spontaneous breaking of the Lorentz group in QED . Physics Letters B , 89(1):61--64, December 1979. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(79)90076-5 doi:10.1016/0370-2693(79)90076-5

    1979 doi

  38. [46]

    Forger and S

    M. Forger and S. V. Romero. Covariant Poisson Brackets in Geometric Field Theory . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 256(2):375--410, June 2005. https://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0408008 arXiv:math-ph/0408008 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-005-1287-8 doi:10.1007/s00220-005-1287-8

    2005 arXiv

  39. [47]

    C. J. Fewster and A. Schenkel. Locally covariant quantum field theory with external sources. Annales Henri Poincar \'e , 16(10):2303--2365, October 2015. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.2436 arXiv:1402.2436 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-014-0372-y doi:10.1007/s00023-014-0372-y

    2015 arXiv

  40. [48]

    C. J. Fewster and R. Verch. Quantum Fields and Local Measurements . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 378(2):851--889, September 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-020-03800-6 doi:10.1007/s00220-020-03800-6

    2020 doi

  41. [49]

    Giacomini, E

    F. Giacomini, E. Castro-Ruiz , and C . Brukner. Quantum mechanics and the covariance of physical laws in quantum reference frames. Nature Communications , 10(1):494, January 2019. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0 doi:10.1038/s41467-018-08155-0

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    Gomes, F

    H. Gomes, F. Hopfm \"u ller, and A. Riello. A unified geometric framework for boundary charges and dressings: Non-Abelian theory and matter. Nuclear Physics B , 941:249--315, April 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.02.020 doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2019.02.020

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    W. H. Greub, S. Halperin, and R. Vanstone. Connections, Curvature , and Cohomology : De Rham Cohomology of Manifolds and Vector Bundles . Academic Press, 1972

    1972

  44. [52]

    G \"u rer and P

    S. G \"u rer and P. Iglesias-Zemmour . Differential forms on manifolds with boundary and corners. Indagationes Mathematicae , 30(5):920--929, September 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indag.2019.07.004 doi:10.1016/j.indag.2019.07.004

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    D. Giulini. Asymptotic symmetry groups of long-ranged gauge configurations. Modern Physics Letters A , 10(28):2059--2070, September 1995. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217732395002210 doi:10.1142/S0217732395002210

    doi

  46. [54]

    G owacki

    J. G owacki. Quantum Reference Frames on Homogeneous Spaces , September 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.07231 arXiv:2409.07231 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.07231 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2409.07231

    2024 doi arXiv

  47. [55]

    Girelli, C

    F. Girelli, C. Pollack, and A. Riello. Beyond Noether : A Covariant Study of Poisson-Lie Symmetries in Low Dimensional Field Theory , May 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14942 arXiv:2505.14942 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.14942 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.14942

    2025 doi

  48. [56]

    Gomes and A

    H. Gomes and A. Riello. The Observer 's Ghost : A field-space connection-form and its application to gauge theories and general relativity. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2017(5):17, May 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1608.08226 arXiv:1608.08226 , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP05...

    2017 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Gomes and A

    H. Gomes and A. Riello. Large gauge transformations, gauge invariance, and the QCD _ ym -term, July 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.04013 arXiv:2007.04013 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.04013 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2007.04013

    2020 doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    Gomes and A

    H. Gomes and A. Riello. The quasilocal degrees of freedom of Yang-Mills theory. SciPost Physics , 10(6):130, June 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/1910.04222 arXiv:1910.04222 , https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.130 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.130

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    G \'e rard and M

    C. G \'e rard and M. Wrochna. Construction of Hadamard states by pseudo-differential calculus. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 325(2):713--755, January 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2604 arXiv:1209.2604 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-013-1824-9 doi:10.1007/s00220...

    2014 arXiv

  52. [60]

    R. Haag. Local Quantum Physics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61458-3 doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61458-3

    1996 doi

  53. [61]

    Herdegen

    A. Herdegen. Long-range effects in asymptotic fields and angular momentum of classical field electrodynamics. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 36(8):4044--4086, August 1995. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530946 doi:10.1063/1.530946

    1995 doi

  54. [62]

    Herdegen

    A. Herdegen. Semidirect product of CCR and CAR algebras and asymptotic states in quantum electrodynamics, July 1998. https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9711066 arXiv:hep-th/9711066 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9711066 doi:10.48550/arXiv.hep-th/9711066

    1998 doi arXiv

  55. [63]

    Herdegen

    A. Herdegen. Asymptotic structure of electrodynamics revisited. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 107(8):1439--1470, August 2017. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.04170 arXiv:1604.04170 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-017-0948-9 doi:10.1007/s11005-017-0948-9

    2017 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Hawkins and K

    E. Hawkins and K. Rejzner. The star product in interacting quantum field theory. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 110(6):1257--1313, June 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11005-020-01262-4 doi:10.1007/s11005-020-01262-4

    2020 doi

  57. [65]

    Hollands and R

    S. Hollands and R. M. Wald. Existence of Local Covariant Time Ordered Products of Quantum Fields in Curved Spacetime . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 231(2):309--345, December 2002. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-002-0719-y doi:10.1007/s00220-002-0719-y

    2002 doi

  58. [66]

    Harlow and J.-q

    D. Harlow and J.-q. Wu. Covariant phase space with boundaries. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2020(10):146, October 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.08616 arXiv:1906.08616 , https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP10(2020)146 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2020)146

    2020 arXiv

  59. [67]

    D. W. Janssen. Quantum fields on semi-globally hyperbolic space--times. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 391(2):669--705, April 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-022-04328-7 doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04328-7

    2022 doi

  60. [68]

    B. S. Kay. Linear spin-zero quantum fields in external gravitational and scalar fields. I . A one particle structure for the stationary case. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 62(1):55--70, January 1978

    1978

  61. [69]

    Kabel, C

    V. Kabel, C . Brukner, and W. Wieland. Quantum Reference Frames at the Boundary of Spacetime . Physical Review D , 108(10):106022, November 2023. https://arxiv.org/abs/2302.11629 arXiv:2302.11629 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.106022 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.106022

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    P. P. Kulish and L. D. Faddeev. Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics. Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 4(2):745--757, June 1970. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066485 doi:10.1007/BF01066485

    1970 doi

  63. [71]

    Khavkine

    I. Khavkine. Covariant phase space, constraints, gauge and the Peierls formula. International Journal of Modern Physics A , 29(05):1430009, February 2014. https://arxiv.org/abs/1402.1282 arXiv:1402.1282 , https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217751X14300099 doi:10.1142/S0217751X14300099

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Kriegl and P

    A. Kriegl and P. W. Michor. The Convenient Setting of Global Analysis . American Mathematical Soc., 1997

    1997

  65. [73]

    Khavkine and V

    I. Khavkine and V. Moretti. Algebraic QFT in curved spacetime and quasifree Hadamard states: An introduction. In R. Brunetti, C. Dappiaggi, K. Fredenhagen, and J. Yngvason, editors, Advances in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory , Mathematical Physics Studies , pages 191--251. Spr...

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    Kadison and J

    R. Kadison and J. Ringrose. Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras. Volume II . Fundamentals of the Theory of Operator Algebras. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 1997

    1997

  67. [75]

    Kijowski and W

    J. Kijowski and W. M. Tulczyjew, editors. A Symplectic Framework for Field Theories , volume 107 of Lecture Notes in Physics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1979. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-09538-1 doi:10.1007/3-540-09538-1

    1979 doi

  68. [76]

    B. S. Kay and R. M. Wald. Theorems on the uniqueness and thermal properties of stationary, nonsingular, quasifree states on spacetimes with a bifurcate killing horizon. Physics Reports , 207(2):49--136, August 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(91)90015-E doi:10.1016/0370...

    1991 doi

  69. [77]

    J. M. Lee. Introduction to Smooth Manifolds , volume 218 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer, New York, NY, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9982-5 doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-9982-5

    2012 doi

  70. [78]

    L. D. Loveridge, T. Miyadera, and P. Busch. Symmetry, Reference Frames , and Relational Quantities in Quantum Mechanics . Foundations of Physics , 48(2):135--198, February 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10701-018-0138-3 doi:10.1007/s10701-018-0138-3

    2018 doi

  71. [79]

    Lee and R

    J. Lee and R. M. Wald. Local symmetries and constraints. Journal of Mathematical Physics , 31(3):725--743, March 1990. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.528801 doi:10.1063/1.528801

    1990 doi

  72. [80]

    G. W. Mackey. The Theory of Unitary Group Representations : Chicago Lectures in Mathematics . University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA, 1976

    1976

  73. [81]

    Mathieu, L

    P. Mathieu, L. Murray, A. Schenkel, and N. J. Teh. Homological perspective on edge modes in linear Yang-Mills and Chern-Simons theory. Letters in Mathematical Physics , 110(7):1559--1584, July 2020. https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.10651 arXiv:1907.10651 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s1...

    2020 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Minguzzi and M

    E. Minguzzi and M. Sanchez. The causal hierarchy of spacetimes. In H. Baum and D. Alekseevsky, editors, Recent Developments in Pseudo- Riemannian Geometry , ESI Lect . Math . Phys . Eur. Math. Soc. Publ. House, Z \"u rich, Switzerland, 2008. https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0609119...

    2008 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Manuceau and A

    J. Manuceau and A. Verbeure. Quasi-free states of the C . C . R .--- Algebra and Bogoliubov transformations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 9(4):293--302, December 1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01654283 doi:10.1007/BF01654283

    1968 doi

  76. [84]

    T. G. Mertens and Q.-F. Wu. Minimal Factorization of Chern-Simons Theory -- Gravitational Anyonic Edge Modes , May 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.00501 arXiv:2505.00501 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.00501 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2505.00501

    2025 doi arXiv

  77. [85]

    R. E. Peierls. The Commutation Laws of Relativistic Field Theory . Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences , 214(1117):143--157, 1952. https://www.jstor.org/stable/99080 jstor:99080

    1952

  78. [86]

    R. Penrose. Techniques of differential topology in relativity , volume No. 7 of Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Applied Mathematics . Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1972

    1972

  79. [87]

    M. J. Pfenning. Quantization of the Maxwell field in curved spacetimes of arbitrary dimension. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 26(13):135017, June 2009. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/26/13/135017 doi:10.1088/0264-9381/26/13/135017

    2009 doi

  80. [88]

    K. Rejzner. Perturbative Algebraic Quantum Field Theory : An Introduction for Mathematicians . Springer, softcover reprint of the original 1st ed. 2016 edition edition, April 2018

    2016

  81. [89]

    A. Riello. Edge modes without edge modes, April 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.10182 arXiv:2104.10182 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.10182 doi:10.48550/arXiv.2104.10182

    2021 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    A. Riello. Symplectic reduction of Yang-Mills theory with boundaries: From superselection sectors to edge modes, and back. SciPost Physics , 10(6):125, June 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15894 arXiv:2010.15894 , https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.6.125 doi:10.21468/Sci...

    2021 arXiv

  83. [91]

    P. L. Robinson. Symplectic pathology. The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics , 44(1):101--107, March 1993. https://doi.org/10.1093/qmath/44.1.101 doi:10.1093/qmath/44.1.101

    1993 doi

  84. [92]

    Rejzner and M

    K. Rejzner and M. Schiavina. Asymptotic symmetries in the BV-BFV formalism. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 385(2):1083--1132, July 2021. https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09957 arXiv:2002.09957 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04061-7 doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04061-7

    2021 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Riello and M

    A. Riello and M. Schiavina. Hamiltonian gauge theory with corners: Constraint reduction and flux superselection. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics , 28(4):1241--1424, October 2024. https://doi.org/10.4310/ATMP.241029014101 doi:10.4310/ATMP.241029014101

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    Riello and M

    A. Riello and M. Schiavina. Null Hamiltonian Yang-Mills theory: Soft symmetries and memory as superselection. Annales Henri Poincar \'e , 26(2):389--477, February 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.03531 arXiv:2303.03531 , https://doi.org/10.1007/s00023-024-01428-z doi:10.1007/s...

    2025 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Regge and C

    T. Regge and C. Teitelboim. Role of surface integrals in the Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. Annals of Physics , 88(1):286--318, November 1974. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(74)90404-7 doi:10.1016/0003-4916(74)90404-7

    1974 doi

  88. [96]

    G. Schwarz. Hodge Decomposition --- A Method for Solving Boundary Value Problems , volume 1607 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095978 doi:10.1007/BFb0095978

    1995 doi

  89. [97]

    Sanders, C

    K. Sanders, C. Dappiaggi, and T.-P. Hack. Electromagnetism, Local Covariance , the Aharonov -- Bohm Effect and Gauss ' Law . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 328(2):625--667, June 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-014-1989-x doi:10.1007/s00220-014-1989-x

    2014 doi

  90. [98]

    J. Slawny. On factor representations and the C *-algebra of canonical commutation relations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 24(2):151--170, June 1972. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01878451 doi:10.1007/BF01878451

    1972 doi

  91. [99]

    \'S niatycki

    J. \'S niatycki. On boundary conditions for Yang-Mills fields in spatially bounded domains. In J.-D. Hennig, W. L \"u cke, and J. Tolar, editors, Differential Geometry , Group Representations , and Quantization , pages 43--53, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991. Springer. https://doi.or...

    1991 doi

  92. [100]

    J.-M. Souriau. Structure Des Syst \`e mes Dynamiques . Dunod, Paris, 1970

    1970

  93. [101]

    Staruszkiewicz

    A. Staruszkiewicz. Gauge invariant surface contribution to the number of photons integral. Acta Phys. Polon. B , 12:327--337, 1981

    1981

  94. [102]

    Strominger

    A. Strominger. Asymptotic symmetries of Yang-Mills theory. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2014(7):151, July 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/JHEP07(2014)151 doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2014)151

    2014 doi

  95. [103]

    Strominger

    A. Strominger. Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory , February 2018. https://arxiv.org/abs/1703.05448 arXiv:1703.05448 , https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05448 doi:10.48550/arXiv.1703.05448

    2018 doi arXiv

  96. [104]

    Strohmaier

    A. Strohmaier. The Classical and Quantum Photon Field for Non-compact Manifolds with Boundary and in Possibly Inhomogeneous Media . Communications in Mathematical Physics , 387(3):1441--1489, November 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-021-04218-4 doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04218-4

    2021 doi

  97. [105]

    H. H. Schaefer and M. P. Wolff. Topological vector spaces , volume 3 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics . Springer-Verlag, New York, second edition, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1468-7 doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1468-7

    1999 doi

  98. [106]

    Satishchandran and R

    G. Satishchandran and R. M. Wald. The Asymptotic Behavior of Massless Fields and the Memory Effect . Physical Review D , 99(8):084007, April 2019. https://arxiv.org/abs/1901.05942 arXiv:1901.05942 , https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084007 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.084007

    2019 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Takesaki

    M. Takesaki. Theory of Operator Algebras II . Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002

    2002

  100. [108]

    M. E. Taylor. Partial Differential Equations II : Qualitative Studies of Linear Equations , volume 116 of Applied Mathematical Sciences . Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-33700-0 doi:10.1007/978-3-031-33700-0

    2023 doi

  101. [109]

    Van Daele

    A. Van Daele. Continuous Crossed Products and Type III von Neumann Algebras , volume 31 of London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-New York, 1978

    1978

  102. [110]

    Vanrietvelde, P

    A. Vanrietvelde, P. A. Hoehn, F. Giacomini, and E. Castro-Ruiz . A change of perspective: Switching quantum reference frames via a perspective-neutral framework. Quantum , 4:225, January 2020. https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225 doi:10.22331/q-2020-01-27-225

    2020 doi

  103. [111]

    X.-G. Wen. Theory of the edge states in fractional quantum hall effects. International Journal of Modern Physics B , 06(10):1711--1762, May 1992. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0217979292000840 doi:10.1142/S0217979292000840

    1992 doi

  104. [112]

    K. G. Wilson. Confinement of quarks. Physical Review D , 10(8):2445--2459, October 1974. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2445

    1974 doi

  105. [113]

    G. J. Zuckerman. Action principles and global geometry. In Mathematical Aspects of String Theory , volume Volume 1 of Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics , pages 259--284. WORLD SCIENTIFIC, September 1987. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812798411_0013 doi:10.1142/9789812798411_0013

    1987 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.