Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 2 cited by

Supernova Remnants with Mirror Dark Matter and Hyperons

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a few percent of mirror dark matter trapped in a newborn neutron star's core would measurably shrink its radius, lower its maximum mass, reduce its tidal deformability, heat the core, and speed up sound through the…

desk verdict New combination of hot PNS evolution and two-fluid mirror dark matter; the qualitative compaction/heating trends are plausible, but the numbers rest on an admitted equal-entropy ansatz and need sensitivity testing. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.17946 v2 pith:FUJMGQAG submitted 2024-12-23 hep-ph

Adamu Issifu , Prashant Thakur , Franciele M. da Silva , Kau D. Marquez , Débora P. Menezes , M. Dutra , O. Lourenço , Tobias Frederico This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-ph PACS 95.35.+d97.60.Jd26.60.-c
keywords mirrordarkmatterproto-neutronstarssupernovaremnantstwo-fluidTOVrelativisticmean-fieldhyperonstidaldeformabilityequationofstate
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that mirror dark matter, even at the few-percent level, reshapes the observable properties of supernova remnants from their birth as neutrino-rich proto-neutron stars through their cooling into ordinary neutron stars. Treating ordinary and dark matter as two fluids that interact only through gravity, and assuming that both sectors share the same entropy per baryon and lepton fraction at every evolutionary stage, the authors compute separate equations of state and then solve the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff structure equations. They find that 1% and 5% dark-matter mass fractions in the remnant core make the star more compact: maximum mass, radius, and tidal deformability all decrease. They also find that dark matter heats the stellar matter, lowers neutron-proton asymmetry, shifts particle populations toward hyperons, and raises the squared speed of sound. If these results hold, they offer an indirect, gravity-only way to detect dark matter in compact stars and a possible explanation for scatter in neutron-star mass and radius measurements.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a relativistic mean-field description with density-dependent couplings (the DDME2 parameterization) applied separately to ordinary matter and to a mirrored dark sector whose Lagrangian mimics the visible one with dark scalar and vector mesons. The two fluids are coupled thermodynamically by fixing the same entropy per baryon ($s_B$) and lepton fraction ($Y_{L,e}$) at each stage of remnant evolution, which determines temperature and composition as functions of density. Macroscopic quantities come from the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations together with the differential equation for the Love number $k_2$, which yields the dimensionless tidal deformability $\Lambda = (2/3)k_2 C^{-5}$ with compactness $C=M/R$. The same framework produces the pressure and mass profiles used to extract particle fractions, temperature profiles, and the speed of sound.

What would settle it

Re-solve the two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff equations with the dark fluid at a different entropy per baryon than the visible fluid (for instance, cold dark matter inside a hot ordinary core); if the predicted extra heating, reduced isospin asymmetry, and smaller tidal deformability vanish or reverse, the central result rests entirely on the equal-entropy assumption. Observationally, a precision mass-radius or tidal-deformability measurement of a compact object that matches the no-dark-matter curve would do the same.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that dark matter need not annihilate or couple to ordinary matter to leave an imprint on a supernova remnant; gravitational interaction alone is enough. In a two-fluid picture with a mirrored dark sector (dark protons, dark neutrons, dark electrons, and dark neutrinos) coexisting with nucleonic and hyperonic matter, the paper shows that a fixed dark-matter mass fraction of 1% or 5% in the core systematically lowers the maximum gravitational mass (for cold nucleonic stars, from 2.48 to 2.33 $M_\odot$ at 5% DM), shrinks the corresponding radius, and reduces the dimensionless tidal deformability of a canonical $1.4\,M_\odot$ star (for the same cold nucleonic case, from 704 to 356). The same dark matter heats the core by compressing the star through additional gravitational pull, decreases the isospin asymmetry $\delta=(n_n-n_p)/(n_n+n_p)$ by favoring protons and hyperons over neutrons and leptons, and increases the squared speed of sound $c_s^2$ inside the star. The authors present these as model-dependent predictions that connect microscopic particle fractions to macroscopic observables.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that dark matter and ordinary matter share the same entropy per baryon and lepton fraction at every evolutionary stage, even though the paper acknowledges that thermal equilibrium between the two sectors is unlikely when they interact only gravitationally.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A 5% mirror-dark-matter mass fraction lowers the maximum mass of cold nucleonic stars from 2.48 to 2.33 $M_\odot$ and of cold hyperonic stars from 2.26 to 2.11 $M_\odot$, shifting where remnants sit in the mass-radius plane.
  • The canonical $1.4\,M_\odot$ tidal deformability drops sharply with dark matter (from 704 to 356 in the cold nucleonic case at 5% DM), moving stars toward the observed binary-merger tidal constraint and changing the expected inspiral signal.
  • Dark matter heats the core by gravitational compression, most visibly during deleptonization, which would prolong the cooling phase and affect estimates of a young remnant's age.
  • Dark matter favors hyperon production and lowers isospin asymmetry, making the onset radii of $\Lambda$, $\Xi$, and $\Sigma$ species inside the star sensitive to dark-matter content.
  • Because the same entropy and lepton-fraction assumptions are applied at every stage, the predictions form a unified evolutionary sequence from the neutrino-rich birth state to the cold catalyzed neutron star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Implicit in the results but not pursued in the paper: if the dark sector is colder than the visible sector rather than sharing its entropy, the predicted heating and sound-speed rise would probably weaken, so the quantitative numbers are best read as an upper bound on gravity-only dark-matter effects under the most favorable thermalization assumption.
  • One extension would be to apply the same two-fluid machinery to merger remnants, which are hotter and more massive than isolated proto-neutron stars; dark-matter-induced compactification could then show up in the post-merger gravitational-wave spectrum of next-generation detectors.
  • Because mirrored dark matter can form its own compact stars, the two-fluid framework also implies mixed visible-dark binaries; a dark companion would look like an unusually compact object with very low tidal deformability in a gravitational-wave catalog.
  • The predicted drop in isospin asymmetry could be cross-checked against nuclear symmetry-energy constraints: if terrestrial experiments fix the symmetry-energy slope, the dark-matter fraction needed to produce a given shift in $\delta$ becomes a testable parameter.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the effects of a mirror dark matter component on proto-neutron stars (supernova remnants) using the DDME2 relativistic mean-field model for ordinary matter (with and without hyperons) and a mirror dark fermion model, within a two-fluid Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff framework. The dark and visible sectors are assumed to have equal entropy per baryon and equal lepton fraction at each evolutionary stage, and 1% and 5% dark matter mass fractions are added to the stellar core. The authors compute mass-radius relations, tidal deformabilities, temperature profiles, particle fractions, and sound speeds for 2.1 solar mass stars. They conclude that dark matter compacts the remnant, reduces its maximum mass, radius, and tidal deformability, heats the matter, decreases isospin asymmetry, and increases sound speed.

Significance. If correct, this is one of the first studies of dark matter effects in hot proto-neutron stars with hyperons, extending the two-fluid DM-admixed neutron star literature to early evolutionary stages. The qualitative trends are plausible and consistent with prior cold-star DM studies, and the paper is transparent about its main assumption—equal entropy and lepton fraction between sectors—while also comparing with pulsar and GW170817 constraints. However, because the quantitative results are conditional on this unverified ansatz and on the fixed DM fractions, the work is exploratory rather than a definitive prediction.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. I; Sec. II B; Eqs. (23)-(24)] The equal-entropy/lepton-fraction assumption is load-bearing. The authors state that thermal equilibrium is 'unlikely' for gravity-only coupling, yet they set s_D = s_B and Y_L,D = Y_L,e at every stage. Because the dark EoS—and thus the two-fluid TOV solutions for M_max, R, Λ, temperature, and sound speed—depends sensitively on these inputs, the quantitative results in Table III and Figs. 4–6 are contingent on this single unverified choice. Please provide a sensitivity study over a plausible range of s_D and Y_L,D (e.g., s_D = 0.5, 1, 2, 4; Y_L,D = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4) and state how the main conclusions change.
  2. [Table III, s_B=1, Y_L,e=0.4, NH row] The reported R_2.1 values are 14.04 km (0% DM), 13.15 km (1% DM), and 13.88 km (5% DM). This non-monotonic behavior contradicts the paper's claim that increasing DM mass fraction monotonically reduces the radius. If this is not a typographical error, please explain the physical mechanism or re-examine the numerical matching; otherwise the conclusion 'DM reduces radius' is not robust.
  3. [Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The sound speed is not computed from the two-fluid EoS. The authors evaluate c_s^2 from the OM EoS at fixed s_B and then use cubic spline interpolation to map the total pressure P(r) to c_s^2. This neglects the compressibility of the DM fluid. Since the paper claims DM increases the sound speed, please either compute the effective two-fluid sound speed from P = P_OM + P_D and ε = ε_OM + ε_D along the radial profile, or demonstrate that the interpolation is quantitatively accurate for 5% DM.
  4. [Sec. V, DM mass fraction motivation] The text states that the capture rate (about 10^25 GeV/s) over a neutron star lifetime (10^17 s) implies the accumulated DM mass is 'likely insufficient to form a significant fraction of their total mass,' yet the study uses 1% and 5% mass fractions. This is inconsistent. Please clarify whether the 1% and 5% values are intended as upper bounds, parametric choices, or motivated by alternative accumulation scenarios (e.g., asymmetric DM, primordial accumulation, or self-capture), and discuss their astrophysical plausibility.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. I] 'Tolman-Oppenheiman-Volkoff' is misspelled; it should be 'Tolman-Oppenheimer-Volkoff'.
  2. [Sec. II B, text after Eq. (19)] 'µ_B′ the total baryon density of the dark sector' should read 'chemical potential' rather than 'density'.
  3. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption states 'bottom-left: sB = 2 and YL,e = 0', which is inconsistent with the panel label 'sB=2; Yνe=0.0'; please align the caption with the panel.
  4. [Sec. IV, Fig. 5] The notation c_s^2 = ∂P/∂ε conflicts with the earlier definition c_s^2 = (dP_OM/dε_OM)|_{s_B}; please define both symbols explicitly to avoid ambiguity.
  5. [Reference list] In reference [41], 'Neuton stars' should be 'Neutron stars'.
  6. [Abstract] The phrase 'For the first time' is a strong claim; consider softening it to 'We use...' or 'We present a...' unless a careful literature check fully supports the novelty.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DM effects are derived from two-fluid TOV integration, and the self-citations supply stated model inputs rather than the target conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—that dark matter reduces maximum mass, radius, and tidal deformability, heats the remnant, lowers isospin asymmetry, and raises sound speed—are outputs of a two-fluid TOV calculation, not restatements of its inputs. The inputs are the DDME2 RMF equation of state for visible matter (parameterized in Tables I and II, with details adopted from prior work), a mirror dark-matter EoS built with the same couplings and masses, the explicit assumptions s_D = s_B and equal lepton fractions in both sectors, and fixed dark-matter mass fractions FD = 0%, 1%, and 5%. None of these inputs prescribes the comparison between the DM and no-DM configurations; that comparison emerges from integrating the coupled TOV equations (25)–(27) and solving the tidal perturbation equation (30). The reported temperature increase, particle-fraction shifts, and sound-speed changes are obtained by evaluating the separately computed OM EoS along the modified pressure profiles, so they are derived consequences rather than fitted outputs. The self-citations, e.g., to the OM EoS in Ref. [76] and to the hyperon coupling scheme in Ref. [66], are legitimate model inputs with stated, independent derivations; they do not themselves assert the DM-induced effects claimed here. External benchmarks such as GW170817 and NICER mass-radius observations are used only for comparison. The admitted lack of an established DM–OM thermalization reference and the adoption of equal entropy as a first approximation are modeling caveats that affect quantitative predictions, but they do not make the derivation circular: changing s_D or the dark lepton fraction would alter the results, yet the logical chain from stated inputs to calculated outputs remains non-circular. No step reduces, by the paper's own equations or by self-citation, to its own input in the sense required for a circularity finding.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central calculation depends on a small set of hand-picked inputs (F_D, m_D) and on the unverified assumption that the dark sector's thermal state matches the visible sector's entropy and lepton fraction. These are not fitted to data, so they appear as free parameters and axioms rather than as circular fits.

free parameters (2)
  • Dark matter mass fraction F_D = 1% and 5%
    Chosen by hand as fixed proportions of total gravitational mass; exploratory values not derived from capture-rate estimates, as discussed in the final remarks.
  • Dark fermion mass m_D = 939 MeV
    Set equal to the nucleon mass by mirror symmetry in Sec. II B; no independent measurement constrains this value.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Dark matter and ordinary matter interact only gravitationally.
    Justifies the two-fluid TOV framework; standard in the dark-matter-admixed neutron star literature (Sec. I).
  • ad hoc to paper Dark matter and ordinary matter share the same entropy per baryon and lepton fraction at each evolution stage.
    The authors admit there is no established justification and that thermal equilibrium is unlikely for gravity-only coupling, yet they adopt this as a first approximation (Sec. I).
  • domain assumption The mirror dark sector adopts the same couplings, meson masses, and saturation density as the visible sector.
    Model choice inherited from mirror DM literature, used in Sec. II B to reduce arbitrary parameters; unverified.
  • domain assumption The proto-neutron star is spherically symmetric and in hydrostatic equilibrium during evolution.
    Standard quasi-static approximation for PNS evolution, stated in Sec. I.
  • domain assumption The RMF model with DDME2 couplings and the hyperon coupling scheme from Ref. [66] accurately describes hot dense baryonic matter.
    The ordinary-matter EoS is taken from previous work [76] and applied here without revalidation.
invented entities (1)
  • Mirror dark fermion (dark proton/neutron) with mass 939 MeV
    purpose: Acts as the dark-matter fluid in the two-fluid TOV equations; its pressure and energy density determine all reported DM effects.
    The mirror sector is borrowed from prior mirror DM models, not detected experimentally, and has no direct falsifiable handle offered in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Supernova Remnants with Mirror Dark Matter and Hyperons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FUJMGQAG

@misc{pith2026241217946,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Supernova Remnants with Mirror Dark Matter and Hyperons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FUJMGQAG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.17946}
}
read the original abstract

For the first time, we use relativistic mean-field (RMF) approximation with density-dependent couplings, adjusted by the DDME2 parameterization, to investigate the effects of dark matter on supernova remnants. We calculate the nuclear equation of state for nuclear and dark matter separately, under the thermodynamic conditions related to the evolution of supernova remnants. A mirrored model is adopted for dark matter, and its effect on remnant matter is studied using a two-fluid scenario. At each stage of the remnant evolution, we assume that dark and ordinary matter have the same entropy and lepton fraction, and a fixed proportion of dark matter mass fraction is added to the stellar matter to observe its effects on some microscopic and macroscopic properties of the star. We observe that dark matter in the remnant core reduces the remnant's maximum mass, radius, and tidal deformability. Moreover, dark matter heats the remnant matter and alters particle distributions, thereby decreasing its isospin asymmetry and increasing the sound speed through the matter.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.17946 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. EoS for dark matter configurations with and without [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The pressure profile of 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Particle population profile of a 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature profile of a 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Total gravitational mass ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Dimensionless tidal deformability (Λ) as a function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A self-consistent Higgs-portal framework for dark matter--admixed neutron stars: Collider-motivated benchmarks meet multimessenger constraints

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adding heavy dark matter to neutron stars via nχ=FχnB softens the equation of state and lowers the maximum mass, but the vector interaction invoked is numerically negligible.

  2. Effect of Dark matter and $\sigma$-cut potential on radial and non-radial oscillation modes in neutron stars

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Dark matter-admixed neutron stars oscillate at higher f- and p1-mode frequencies than ordinary or σ-cut models, while quasi-universal oscillation relations still hold.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

119 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    maturity

    = Pcenter, M (r = 0) = 0, P (r = R) = 0 and M (R) = 2 .10M⊙ within the two-fluid TOV framework. For each particle fraction or temperature distribution corresponding to POM , we determine its equivalent in P using the cubic spline interpolation method. This serves as a reasonable approximation in the absence of a rigorous first-principles approach that ful...

    2014

  2. [2]

    Klasen, M

    M. Klasen, M. Pohl, and G. Sigl, Indirect and direct search for dark matter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 85, 1 (2015), arXiv:1507.03800 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2015

  3. [3]

    R. L. Workman et al. (Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Dutra, C

    M. Dutra, C. H. Lenzi, and O. Louren¸ co, Dark particle mass effects on neutron star properties from a short- range correlated hadronic model, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 517, 4265 (2022), arXiv:2211.10263 [nucl- th]

    arXiv 2022

  5. [5]

    acknowledges financial support from the S˜ ao Paulo State Research Foundation (F APESP), Grant No

    A.I. acknowledges financial support from the S˜ ao Paulo State Research Foundation (F APESP), Grant No. 2023/09545-1. T. F. thanks the financial support from the Brazilian Institutions: CNPq (Grant No. 306834/2022-7), Improvement of Higher Education Personnel CAPES (Finance Code 001), and F APESP (Grants No. 2017/05660-0 and 2019/07767-1). D.P.M. is parti...

    2023

  6. [6]

    Misiaszek and N

    M. Misiaszek and N. Rossi, Direct Detection of Dark Matter: A Critical Review, Symmetry 16, 201 (2024), arXiv:2310.20472 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    C. H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, L. L. Lopes, and D. P. Menezes, Dark matter effects on hybrid star properties, Eur. Phys. J. C 83, 266 (2023), arXiv:2212.12615 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Hong and Z

    B. Hong and Z. Ren, Mixed dark matter models for the peculiar compact object in remnant HESS J1731-347 and their implications for gravitational wave properties, Phys. Rev. D 109, 023002 (2024)

    2024

Show all 119 references
  1. [9]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Confronting nuclear equation of state in the presence of dark matter using GW170817 observation in relativistic mean field theory approach, Phys. Rev. D 99, 043016 (2019), arXiv:1807.10013 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [10]

    C. V. Flores, C. H. Lenzi, M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, and J. D. V. Arba˜ nil, Gravitational wave asteroseismology of dark matter hadronic stars, Phys. Rev. D 109, 083021 (2024), arXiv:2402.12600 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    H. C. Das, A. Kumar, B. Kumar, S. Kumar Biswal, T. Nakatsukasa, A. Li, and S. K. Patra, Effects of dark matter on the nuclear and neutron star matter, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 495, 4893 (2020), arXiv:2002.00594 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Shirke, S

    S. Shirke, S. Ghosh, D. Chatterjee, L. Sagunski, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, R-modes as a new probe of dark matter in neutron stars, JCAP 2023 (12), 008, arXiv:2305.05664 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, A. Das, T. K. Jha, B. K. 14 Sharma, and C. Providˆ encia, Feasibility of dark matter admixed neutron star based on recent observational constraints, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.03780 (2024), arXiv:2408.03780 [nucl-th]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Collier, D

    M. Collier, D. Croon, and R. K. Leane, Tidal Love numbers of novel and admixed celestial objects, Phys. Rev. D 106, 123027 (2022), arXiv:2205.15337 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Shakeri and D

    S. Shakeri and D. R. Karkevandi, Bosonic dark matter in light of the NICER precise mass-radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043029 (2024), arXiv:2210.17308 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Z. Miao, Y. Zhu, A. Li, and F. Huang, Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Star Properties in the Light of X- Ray Pulse Profile Observations, Astrophys. J. 936, 69 (2022), arXiv:2204.05560 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    M. Emma, F. Schianchi, F. Pannarale, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Numerical Simulations of Dark Matter Admixed Neutron Star Binaries, Particles 5, 273 (2022), arXiv:2206.10887 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    D. R. Karkevandi, S. Shakeri, V. Sagun, and O. Ivanytskyi, Bosonic dark matter in neutron stars and its effect on gravitational wave signal, Phys. Rev. D105, 023001 (2022), arXiv:2109.03801 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  11. [19]

    H. R. R¨ uter, V. Sagun, W. Tichy, and T. Dietrich, Quasiequilibrium configurations of binary systems of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124080 (2023), arXiv:2301.03568 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Liu, J.-B

    H.-M. Liu, J.-B. Wei, Z.-H. Li, G. F. Burgio, and H. J. Schulze, Dark matter effects on the properties of neutron stars: Optical radii, Phys. Dark Univ. 42, 101338 (2023), arXiv:2307.11313 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Ivanytskyi, V

    O. Ivanytskyi, V. Sagun, and I. Lopes, Neutron stars: New constraints on asymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 102, 063028 (2020), arXiv:1910.09925 [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Buras-Stubbs and I

    Z. Buras-Stubbs and I. Lopes, Bosonic dark matter dynamics in hybrid neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043043 (2024), arXiv:2402.19238 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Rutherford, G

    N. Rutherford, G. Raaijmakers, C. Prescod-Weinstein, and A. Watts, Constraining bosonic asymmetric dark matter with neutron star mass-radius measurements, Phys. Rev. D 107, 103051 (2023), arXiv:2208.03282 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, A. Das, T. K. Jha, and C. Providˆ encia, Exploring robust correlations between fermionic dark matter model parameters and neutron star properties: A two-fluid perspective, Phys. Rev. D 109, 043030 (2024), arXiv:2308.00650 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Mahapatra, C

    P. Mahapatra, C. Singha, A. Hazarika, and P. K. Das, Implications of Fermionic Dark Matter Interactions on Anisotropic Neutron Stars (2024), arXiv:2408.14020 [astro-ph.CO]

    2024

  18. [26]

    Thakur, T

    P. Thakur, T. Malik, and T. K. Jha, Towards Uncovering Dark Matter Effects on Neutron Star Properties: A Machine Learning Approach, Particles 7, 80 (2024), arXiv:2401.07773 [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Bauer and T

    M. Bauer and T. Plehn, Yet Another Introduction to Dark Matter: The Particle Physics Approach, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 959 (Springer, 2019) arXiv:1705.01987 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Kahlhoefer, Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches, Int

    F. Kahlhoefer, Review of LHC Dark Matter Searches, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 32, 1730006 (2017), arXiv:1702.02430 [hep-ph]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Leung, M.-c

    K.-L. Leung, M.-c. Chu, and L.-M. Lin, Tidal deformability of dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123010 (2022), arXiv:2207.02433 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys

    B. Kain, Dark matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 103, 043009 (2021), arXiv:2102.08257 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    S. C. Leung, M. C. Chu, and L. M. Lin, Dark-matter admixed neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 84, 107301 (2011), arXiv:1111.1787 [astro-ph.CO]

    2011 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Dark matter admixed neutron star properties in light of gravitational wave observations: A two fluid approach, Physical Review D 105, 123034 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    Louren¸ co, C

    O. Louren¸ co, C. H. Lenzi, T. Frederico, and M. Dutra, Dark matter effects on tidal deformabilities and moment of inertia in a hadronic model with short- range correlations, Phys. Rev. D 106, 043010 (2022), arXiv:2208.06067 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Louren¸ co, T

    O. Louren¸ co, T. Frederico, and M. Dutra, Dark matter component in hadronic models with short- range correlations, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023008 (2022), arXiv:2112.07716 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Xiang, W.-Z

    Q.-F. Xiang, W.-Z. Jiang, D.-R. Zhang, and R.-Y. Yang, Effects of fermionic dark matter on properties of neutron stars, Physical Review C 89, 025803 (2014)

    2014

  28. [36]

    Thakur, B

    P. Thakur, B. K. Sharma, A. Ashika, S. Srivishnu, and T. K. Jha, Influence of the symmetry energy and σ- cut potential on the properties of pure nucleonic and hyperon-rich neutron star matter, Phys. Rev. C 109, 025805 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys

    C. Kouvaris, WIMP Annihilation and Cooling of Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D 77, 023006 (2008), arXiv:0708.2362 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Bertone and M

    G. Bertone and M. Fairbairn, Compact Stars as Dark Matter Probes, Phys. Rev. D 77, 043515 (2008), arXiv:0709.1485 [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Constraining Asymmetric Dark Matter through observations of compact stars, Phys. Rev. D 83, 083512 (2011), arXiv:1012.2039 [astro- ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Ciarcelluti and F

    P. Ciarcelluti and F. Sandin, Have neutron stars a dark matter core?, Phys. Lett. B 695, 19 (2011), arXiv:1005.0857 [astro-ph.HE]

    2011 arXiv

  33. [41]

    N. Raj, P. Tanedo, and H.-B. Yu, Neutron stars at the dark matter direct detection frontier, Phys. Rev. D 97, 043006 (2018), arXiv:1707.09442 [hep-ph]

    2018 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov, Weakly interacting massive particles and neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3221 (1989)

    1989

  35. [43]

    Gould, B

    A. Gould, B. T. Draine, R. W. Romani, and S. Nussinov, Neuton stars: Graveyard of charged dark matter, Physics Letters B 238, 337 (1990)

    1990

  36. [44]

    Kouvaris, Wimp annihilation and cooling of neutron stars, Physical Review D 77, 023006 (2008)

    C. Kouvaris, Wimp annihilation and cooling of neutron stars, Physical Review D 77, 023006 (2008)

    2008

  37. [45]

    Kouvaris and P

    C. Kouvaris and P. Tinyakov, Can neutron stars constrain dark matter?, Physical Review D 82, 063531 (2010)

    2010

  38. [46]

    de Lavallaz and M

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn, Neutron Stars as Dark Matter Probes, Phys. Rev. D 81, 123521 (2010), arXiv:1004.0629 [astro-ph.GA]

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    G¨ uver, A

    T. G¨ uver, A. Emre Erkoca, M. Hall Reno, and I. Sarcevic, On the capture of dark matter by neutron stars, JCAP 2014 (5), 013, arXiv:1201.2400 [hep-ph]

    2014 arXiv

  40. [48]

    ´Angeles P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa and J

    M. ´Angeles P´ erez-Garc ´ ıa and J. Silk, Dark matter seeding and the kinematics and rotation of neutron 15 stars, Physics Letters B 711, 6 (2012)

    2012

  41. [49]

    Sandin and P

    F. Sandin and P. Ciarcelluti, Effects of mirror dark matter on neutron stars, Astroparticle Physics 32, 278 (2009)

    2009

  42. [50]

    Kodama and M

    T. Kodama and M. Yamada, Theory of Superdense Stars, Progress of Theoretical Physics 47, 444 (1972), https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article- pdf/47/2/444/5280268/47-2-444.pdf

    1972

  43. [51]

    de Lavallaz and M

    A. de Lavallaz and M. Fairbairn, Neutron stars as dark matter probes, Physical Review D 81, 123521 (2010)

    2010

  44. [52]

    D. S. Akerib et al. (LUX), Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross section obtained from the complete LUX exposure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251302 (2017), arXiv:1705.03380 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cui et al

    X. Cui et al. (PandaX-II), Dark Matter Results From 54-Ton-Day Exposure of PandaX-II Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 181302 (2017), arXiv:1708.06917 [astro- ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Aprile et al

    E. Aprile et al. (XENON), Dark Matter Search Results from a One Ton-Year Exposure of XENON1T, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 111302 (2018), arXiv:1805.12562 [astro- ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept

    J. Billard et al., Direct detection of dark matter—APPEC committee report*, Rept. Prog. Phys. 85, 056201 (2022), arXiv:2104.07634 [hep-ex]

    2022 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status, J

    M. Schumann, Direct Detection of WIMP Dark Matter: Concepts and Status, J. Phys. G 46, 103003 (2019), arXiv:1903.03026 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  49. [57]

    M. I. Gresham and K. M. Zurek, Asymmetric Dark Stars and Neutron Star Stability, Phys. Rev. D 99, 083008 (2019), arXiv:1809.08254 [astro-ph.CO]

    2019 arXiv

  50. [58]

    A. E. Nelson, S. Reddy, and D. Zhou, Dark halos around neutron stars and gravitational waves, JCAP 2019 (7), 012, arXiv:1803.03266 [hep-ph]

    2019 arXiv

  51. [59]

    A. R. Raduta, M. Oertel, and A. Sedrakian, Proto- neutron stars with heavy baryons and universal relations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 914 (2020), arXiv:2008.00213 [nucl-th]

    2020 arXiv

  52. [60]

    J. A. Pons, S. Reddy, M. Prakash, J. M. Lattimer, and J. A. Miralles, Evolution of protoneutron stars, Astrophys. J. 513, 780 (1999), arXiv:astro-ph/9807040

    1999 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae, Ann

    H.-T. Janka, Explosion Mechanisms of Core-Collapse Supernovae, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 62, 407 (2012), arXiv:1206.2503 [astro-ph.SR]

    2012 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Malfatti, M

    G. Malfatti, M. G. Orsaria, G. A. Contrera, F. Weber, and I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, Hot quark matter and (proto- ) neutron stars, Phys. Rev. C 100, 015803 (2019), arXiv:1907.06597 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Prakash, I

    M. Prakash, I. Bombaci, M. Prakash, P. J. Ellis, J. M. Lattimer, and R. Knorren, Composition and structure of protoneutron stars, Phys. Rept. 280, 1 (1997), arXiv:nucl-th/9603042

    1997 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Burrows and J

    A. Burrows and J. M. Lattimer, The Birth of Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. 307, 178 (1986)

    1986

  57. [65]

    L. F. Roberts, A new code for proto-neutron star evolution, The Astrophysical Journal 755, 126 (2012)

    2012

  58. [66]

    Bertone, D

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper, and J. Silk, Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405, 279 (2005), arXiv:hep-ph/0404175

    2005 arXiv

  59. [67]

    G. A. Lalazissis, T. Nikˇ si´ c, D. Vretenar, and P. Ring, New relativistic mean-field interaction with density- dependent meson-nucleon couplings, Phys. Rev. C 71, 024312 (2005)

    2005

  60. [68]

    L. L. Lopes, K. D. Marquez, and D. P. Menezes, Baryon coupling scheme in a unified SU(3) and SU(6) symmetry formalism, Phys. Rev. D 107, 036011 (2023), arXiv:2211.17153 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Typel and H

    S. Typel and H. H. Wolter, Relativistic mean field calculations with density dependent meson nucleon coupling, Nucl. Phys. A 656, 331 (1999)

    1999

  62. [70]

    Bombaci, The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, JPS Conf

    I. Bombaci, The Hyperon Puzzle in Neutron Stars, JPS Conf. Proc. 17, 101002 (2017), arXiv:1601.05339 [nucl- th]

    2017 arXiv

  63. [71]

    B. T. Reed, F. J. Fattoyev, C. J. Horowitz, and J. Piekarewicz, Implications of PREX-2 on the Equation of State of Neutron-Rich Matter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 172503 (2021), arXiv:2101.03193 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  64. [72]

    J. M. Lattimer, Constraints on Nuclear Symmetry Energy Parameters, Particles 6, 30 (2023), arXiv:2301.03666 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Dutra, O

    M. Dutra, O. Louren¸ co, S. S. Avancini, B. V. Carlson, A. Delfino, D. P. Menezes, C. Providˆ encia, S. Typel, and J. R. Stone, Relativistic Mean-Field Hadronic Models under Nuclear Matter Constraints, Phys. Rev. C 90, 055203 (2014), arXiv:1405.3633 [nucl-th]

    2014 arXiv

  66. [74]

    N. K. Glendenning and S. A. Moszkowski, Reconciliation of neutron star masses and binding of the lambda in hypernuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2414 (1991)

    1991

  67. [75]

    L. L. Lopes and D. P. Menezes, Broken SU(6) symmetry and massive hybrid stars, Nucl. Phys. A 1009, 122171 (2021), arXiv:2004.07909 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Pais, Dynamical Symmetry in Particle Physics, Rev

    A. Pais, Dynamical Symmetry in Particle Physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 215 (1966)

    1966

  69. [77]

    Weissenborn, D

    S. Weissenborn, D. Chatterjee, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Hyperons and massive neutron stars: the role of hyperon potentials, Nucl. Phys. A 881, 62 (2012), arXiv:1111.6049 [astro-ph.HE]

    2012 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Issifu, K

    A. Issifu, K. D. Marquez, M. R. Pelicer, and D. P. Menezes, Exotic baryons in hot neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 522, 3263 (2023), arXiv:2302.04364 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Sedrakian and A

    A. Sedrakian and A. Harutyunyan, Delta-resonances and hyperons in proto-neutron stars and merger remnants, Eur. Phys. J. A 58, 137 (2022), arXiv:2202.12083 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Issifu, D

    A. Issifu, D. P. Menezes, Z. Rezaei, and T. Frederico, Proto-neutron stars with quark cores, JCAP 01, 024, arXiv:2405.10386 [nucl-th]

    arXiv

  73. [81]

    Camelio, A

    G. Camelio, A. Lovato, L. Gualtieri, O. Benhar, J. A. Pons, and V. Ferrari, Evolution of a proto-neutron star with a nuclear many-body equation of state: Neutrino luminosity and gravitational wave frequencies, Phys. Rev. D 96, 043015 (2017), arXiv:1704.01923 [astro- ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  74. [82]

    H. T. Janka, T. Melson, and A. Summa, Physics of Core- Collapse Supernovae in Three Dimensions: a Sneak Preview, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 66, 341 (2016), arXiv:1602.05576 [astro-ph.SR]

    2016 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Vartanyan, A

    D. Vartanyan, A. Burrows, D. Radice, M. A. Skinner, and J. Dolence, A successful 3d core- collapse supernova explosion model, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 482, 351 (2018), https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article- pdf/482/1/351/26151552/sty2585.pdf

    2018

  76. [84]

    D. P. Menezes, A Neutron Star Is Born, Universe 7, 267 (2021), arXiv:2106.09515 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Sandin and P

    F. Sandin and P. Ciarcelluti, Effects of mirror dark 16 matter on neutron stars, Astropart. Phys. 32, 278 (2009), arXiv:0809.2942 [astro-ph]

    2009 arXiv

  78. [86]

    Foot, Mirror matter-type dark matter, Int

    R. Foot, Mirror matter-type dark matter, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 13, 2161 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0407623

    2004 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Berezhiani, Through the looking-glass: Alice’s adventures in mirror world (2005) pp

    Z. Berezhiani, Through the looking-glass: Alice’s adventures in mirror world (2005) pp. 2147–2195, arXiv:hep-ph/0508233

    2005 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Hippert, J

    M. Hippert, J. Setford, H. Tan, D. Curtin, J. Noronha- Hostler, and N. Yunes, Mirror neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 106, 035025 (2022), arXiv:2103.01965 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  81. [89]

    A. Das, T. Malik, and A. C. Nayak, Dark matter admixed neutron star properties in light of gravitational wave observations: A two fluid approach, Phys. Rev. D 105, 123034 (2022), arXiv:2011.01318 [nucl-th]

    2022 arXiv

  82. [90]

    L. Walk, I. Tamborra, H.-T. Janka, A. Summa, and D. Kresse, Neutrino emission characteristics of black hole formation in three-dimensional simulations of stellar collapse, Physical Review D 101, 123013 (2020)

    2020

  83. [91]

    Nakazato and H

    K. Nakazato and H. Suzuki, A New Approach to Mass and Radius of Neutron Stars with Supernova Neutrinos, Astrophys. J. 891, 156 (2020), arXiv:2002.03300 [astro- ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Kumar and H

    A. Kumar and H. Sotani, Impact of dark matter distribution on neutron star properties, Phys. Rev. D 111, 043016 (2025), arXiv:2501.07052 [astro-ph.HE]

    2025 arXiv

  85. [93]

    V. Y. Terebizh, Evolution of a stellar system in the context of the virial equation, Astronomy & Astrophysics 686, A35 (2024)

    2024

  86. [94]

    B. W. Carroll and D. A. Ostlie, An Introduction to Modern Astrophysics, 2nd ed. (Pearson Addison-Wesley, San Francisco, 2006)

    2006

  87. [95]

    Giangrandi, V

    E. Giangrandi, V. Sagun, O. Ivanytskyi, C. Providˆ encia, and T. Dietrich, The Effects of Self-interacting Bosonic Dark Matter on Neutron Star Properties, Astrophys. J. 953, 115 (2023), arXiv:2209.10905 [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  88. [96]

    C. C. Moustakidis, T. Gaitanos, C. Margaritis, and G. A. Lalazissis, Bounds on the speed of sound in dense matter, and neutron star structure, Physical Review C 95, 10.1103/physrevc.95.045801 (2017)

    2017 doi

  89. [97]

    Bedaque and A

    P. Bedaque and A. W. Steiner, Sound velocity bound and neutron stars, Physical Review Letters 114, 10.1103/physrevlett.114.031103 (2015)

    2015 doi

  90. [98]

    J. M. Lattimer and M. Prakash, Neutron star structure and the equation of state, Astrophys. J.550, 426 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0002232

    2001 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Altiparmak, C

    S. Altiparmak, C. Ecker, and L. Rezzolla, On the Sound Speed in Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J. Lett. 939, L34 (2022), arXiv:2203.14974 [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  92. [100]

    H. T. Cromartie et al. (NANOGrav), Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar, Nature Astron. 4, 72 (2019), arXiv:1904.06759 [astro-ph.HE]

    2019 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Fonseca et al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys

    E. Fonseca et al., Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620, Astrophys. J. Lett. 915, L12 (2021), arXiv:2104.00880 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  94. [102]

    T. E. Riley et al., A nicer view of the massive pulsar psr j0740+6620 informed by radio timing and xmm-newton spectroscopy, Astrophys. J. Lett. 918 (2021)

    2021

  95. [103]

    Choudhury et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715, Astrophys

    D. Choudhury et al., A NICER View of the Nearest and Brightest Millisecond Pulsar: PSR J0437–4715, Astrophys. J. Lett. 971, L20 (2024), arXiv:2407.06789 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  96. [104]

    R. W. Romani, D. Kandel, A. V. Filippenko, T. G. Brink, and W. Zheng, PSR J0952 −0607: The Fastest and Heaviest Known Galactic Neutron Star, Astrophys. J. Lett. 934, L17 (2022), arXiv:2207.05124 [astro- ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  97. [105]

    B. P. Abbott et al. , Gw170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018)

    2018

  98. [106]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 161101 (2017), arXiv:1710.05832 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  99. [107]

    Goldman and S

    I. Goldman and S. Nussinov, Weakly Interacting Massive Particles and Neutron Stars, Phys. Rev. D 40, 3221 (1989)

    1989

  100. [108]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific, Virgo), GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 161101 (2018), arXiv:1805.11581 [gr-qc]

    2018 arXiv

  101. [109]

    Kumar, S

    B. Kumar, S. K. Biswal, and S. K. Patra, Tidal deformability of neutron and hyperon stars within relativistic mean field equations of state, Phys. Rev. C 95, 015801 (2017), arXiv:1609.08863 [nucl-th]

    2017 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Maggiore, C

    M. Maggiore, C. Van Den Broeck, N. Bartolo, et al., Science case for the Einstein telescope, JCAP 2020 (3), 050, arXiv:1912.02622 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  103. [111]

    B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific), Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors, Class. Quant. Grav. 34, 044001 (2017), arXiv:1607.08697 [astro-ph.IM]

    2017 arXiv

  104. [112]

    H. C. Das, A. Kumar, and S. K. Patra, Effects of dark matter on the in-spiral properties of the binary neutron stars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 507, 4053 (2021), arXiv:2104.01815 [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  105. [113]

    Koehn, E

    H. Koehn, E. Giangrandi, N. Kunert, R. Somasundaram, V. Sagun, and T. Dietrich, Impact of dark matter on tidal signatures in neutron star mergers with the Einstein Telescope, Phys. Rev. D 110, 103033 (2024), arXiv:2408.14711 [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    J.-B. Wei, G. F. Burgio, A. R. Raduta, and H. J. Schulze, Hot neutron stars and their equation of state, Phys. Rev. C 104, 065806 (2021), arXiv:2112.05323 [nucl-th]

    2021 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Lu, Z.-H

    J.-J. Lu, Z.-H. Li, G. F. Burgio, A. Figura, and H. J. Schulze, Hot neutron stars with microscopic equations of state, Phys. Rev. C 100, 054335 (2019), arXiv:1907.03120 [nucl-th]

    2019 arXiv

  108. [116]

    N. F. Bell, G. Busoni, S. Robles, and M. Virgato, Improved treatment of dark matter capture in neutron stars, JCAP 2020 (9), 028, arXiv:2004.14888 [hep-ph]

    2020 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Reddy and D

    S. Reddy and D. Zhou, Dark lepton superfluid in protoneutron stars, Phys. Rev. D 105, 023026 (2022), arXiv:2107.06279 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  110. [118]

    Issifu, F

    A. Issifu, F. M. da Silva, and D. P. Menezes, Hybrid stars built with density-dependent models, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 525, 5512 (2023), arXiv:2307.00386 [nucl-th]

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    L. L. Lopes, A closer look at the Yukawa interaction from a symmetry group perspective, PTEP 2023, 113D01 (2023), [Erratum: PTEP 2024, 019201 (2024)], arXiv:2305.19388 [hep-ph]

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.