Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Stochastic inflation as a superfluid

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Inflation's superhorizon fluctuations obey superfluid equations

desk verdict A genuinely new superfluid reformulation of stochastic inflation, but the coarse-graining step drops horizon-crossing boundary terms that may source the phase equation. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.03860 v1 pith:FVI6MX4L submitted 2025-06-04 gr-qc astro-ph.COhep-th

Gianmassimo Tasinato This is my paper
classification gr-qcastro-ph.COhep-th PACS 98.80.Cq
keywords stochasticinflationsuperfluidMadelungdecompositionquantumpressureultra-slow-rollwavefunctionphasecoarsegrainingquantum-to-classicaltransition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that inflationary superhorizon fluctuations can be described by the same equations as a superfluid: a continuity equation for a coarse-grained density $\bar{\rho}$ and an Euler equation for an irrotational fluid velocity $\mathbf{v} = \nabla \bar{\Theta}$ equal to the gradient of the wavefunction phase. In this picture, the short-wavelength modes that cross the horizon act as an environment, producing an external force term in the Euler equation that plays the role of the noise in Starobinsky stochastic inflation. In slow-roll inflation the quantum pressure term is exponentially damped, matching the known 'decoherence without decoherence' behavior; in ultra-slow-roll the quantum pressure grows and adds a late-time $\hbar^2$ contribution to the velocity potential. The framework reproduces the standard Starobinsky diffusion equation while providing new information about the phase of the inflationary wavefunction.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Madelung decomposition of the wavefunction, $\psi_k = \sqrt{\rho_k}\, e^{i z^2 \theta_k/\hbar}$, which splits the Schrödinger equation into a continuity equation for the amplitude and an Euler-type equation for the phase. Coarse-graining over superhorizon modes, with $\bar{\rho} = \prod_k \rho_k$ and $\bar{\theta} = \sum_k \theta_k$, converts these into the superfluid system. The fluid velocity is $\mathbf{v} = \nabla \bar{\Theta}$, the external force comes from the coefficient $K(n) = (a^2 H^2)^{-1} \int_0^{aH} k^2 |\varphi_k|^2 d^3k / \int_0^{aH} |\varphi_k|^2 d^3k$, and the quantum pressure is the term $-\hbar^2 \nabla^2 \bar{\rho}^{1/2}/(2 H^2 a^2 z^4 \bar{\rho}^{1/2})$ in the Euler equation.

What would settle it

A direct numerical check: solve the full mode-by-mode Schrödinger problem for the ultra-slow-roll pump field $z \propto a^{-2}$ without coarse-graining, and compare the late-time velocity potential with the paper's prediction $\bar{\Theta} = (1+6n)\bar{\varphi}^2/(4n) + \hbar^2 \pi^2/(3 H^2 z_0)\, (1/n)$. If retained sub-Hubble modes or interactions produce any additional terms, or if the $\hbar^2$ term is altered at leading order, the superfluid closure fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from the quadratic action for free scalar Fourier modes with a generic pump field $z(\tau)$, the paper decomposes the functional Schrödinger wavefunction into an amplitude and a phase and then coarse-grains over modes with $k \le aH$. The result is a pair of coupled equations, (3.12)--(3.13), which have exactly the form of a continuity equation and an Euler equation for a one-dimensional pressureless superfluid: density and velocity propagate along the scalar-field coordinate $\bar{\varphi}$, the velocity is irrotational and fixed by the wavefunction phase, and the short-wavelength modes contribute the force term $-K(n)\bar{\varphi}^2$. In the slow-roll case $z \propto a$ the quantum pressure is exponentially suppressed, so the system behaves classically; in the ultra-slow-roll case $z \propto a^{-2}$ the quantum pressure is exponentially enhanced and produces a $\mathcal{O}(1/n)$ contribution to the velocity potential that is proportional to $\hbar^2$. The paper also derives the Wigner function and entropy relations, showing that the phase controls phase-space correlations and that classicalisation proceeds rapidly in both regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that at superhorizon scales all effects of the integrated short-wavelength modes are captured by a small set of coarse-grained coefficients (noise, drift, and the force term $K(n)$), so that no additional backreaction or mode coupling changes the superfluid form of the equations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The phase of the inflationary wavefunction becomes explicitly computable: in slow-roll $\bar{\Theta} = \bar{\varphi}^2/(4n)$, and in ultra-slow-roll the extra $\hbar^2$ term $\hbar^2 \pi^2/(3H^2 z_0)(1/n)$ appears.
  • The Wigner distribution is fully determined, and the Heisenberg uncertainty product grows like $e^{3n}$, so the superhorizon system classicalises rapidly in both slow-roll and ultra-slow-roll.
  • The coordinate-space and momentum-space entropies obey the subadditivity inequality with mutual information $S_{\rm mut} = \frac{1}{2}\ln(1+\sigma_{xp}^2)$ controlled by the wavefunction phase.
  • A heuristic inclusion of viscosity changes the variance of the Gaussian density as $g(n) = (H^2/(2\pi^2) - \tfrac{2}{3} n \eta_0(n)) n$, which would modify predicted correlation functions if dissipation is present.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Extending beyond the paper: adding self-interactions would likely change the quantum pressure term, since the derivation here is free-field; a Gross-Pitaevskii-style computation is the natural next check.
  • Extending beyond the paper: the phase information could leave observable traces in squeezed-limit bispectra or in off-diagonal density-matrix elements, signatures the paper does not compute.
  • Extending beyond the paper: the superfluid mapping opens a path for cold-atom analog experiments to simulate inflationary phase dynamics, a direction the paper only mentions as an outlook.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper develops a functional Schrödinger (Madelung) description of superhorizon inflationary fluctuations. Coarse-graining over Fourier modes with k ≤ aH, it derives continuity and Euler equations (3.12)–(3.13) for a fluid density ρ̄ and velocity potential Θ̄, with an external force −K(n)φ̄² and a quantum-pressure term. Explicit solutions are presented for slow-roll (SR) and ultra-slow-roll (USR) inflation, and it is claimed that the USR quantum-pressure contribution grows exponentially and affects the wavefunction phase at late times. The paper also gives general expressions for the Wigner function, variances, and entropies, and proposes a heuristic Navier–Stokes-like extension with a viscosity coefficient η(n,φ).

Significance. If the derivation were fully rigorous, the superfluid analogy would offer a compact and potentially useful reformulation of stochastic inflation, particularly for tracking the wavefunction phase and for connecting to quantum-to-classical transition and analog-gravity ideas. The paper is largely analytic and self-contained: it re-derives the Starobinsky diffusion equation in Appendix A, provides explicit SR/USR solutions, and introduces no fitted parameters except the heuristic viscosity η(n,φ) in Section 6. These are strengths. However, the central coarse-graining step has a gap that bears directly on the claimed derivation, so the significance is conditional on repair.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.1–3.2] The coarse-graining in eqs (3.1)–(3.2) uses a time-dependent mode set k ≤ aH, but the derivation of eqs (3.8) and (3.10) sums the per-mode equations (2.10)–(2.11) over a fixed set of modes. The time derivative of the product ρ̄ = ∏ρ_k and the sum θ̄ = Σθ_k therefore contains boundary terms proportional to d(aH)/dn evaluated at k = aH, which are absent from the derivation. These boundary terms are the standard origin of the stochastic noise in the Starobinsky equation, yet no analogous source appears in the Euler equation (3.13). The identification of −K(n)φ̄² as the effect of horizon-crossing modes is thus unsupported. Please either include these boundary contributions explicitly, show that the boundary phase is a pure global phase or otherwise negligible, or adopt a fixed/smooth window function.
  2. [4.2] The text states that the quantum-pressure contribution 'increases exponentially with the e-fold number' in eq (4.8). However, the solution (4.12) shows the quantum-pressure-induced part of Θ is ℏ²π²/(3H²z0) · 1/n, which decreases as 1/n. The factor e^{6n} in the coefficient is cancelled by the exponential suppression of ∇²ρ^{1/2}/ρ^{1/2} for the Gaussian density (4.11). The claim should be corrected to state the net contribution to the velocity potential.
  3. [3.2 / 4.1] For the free-field Gaussian state of Appendix A, the mode-summed phase is θ_k = −Im(α_k)|φ_k|², giving at late times a velocity potential of opposite sign to the solution Θ = φ̄²/(4n) quoted in eq (4.7). Substituting the SR solution into eq (4.3) also leaves a residual of order 1/n², which is within the stated truncation, but the sign discrepancy with the exact phase suggests that either eq (3.13) has a sign error in the −K(n)φ̄² term or the solution is not actually derivable from that equation. Please reconcile the sign and the relation between Θ and the mode-summed phase.
minor comments (5)
  1. [3.3] The passage from eq (3.18) to the claim that it is 'complementary' to (3.12)–(3.13) would benefit from an explicit explanation of how the noise coefficient N(n) in (3.18) relates to the boundary terms neglected in Section 3.2.
  2. [5.1] Equation (5.6): the exponent in the Wigner function is typeset ambiguously; please clarify the grouping of x² and the squared momentum term.
  3. [6] There are several typos (e.g., U(ϕ) versus U(φ), and missing bars on φ and D) that make the heuristic equations harder to read.
  4. [5] The paper would benefit from a short discussion of how the present phase-space approach relates to the earlier phase-space stochastic inflation of Habib [71].
  5. [5.1] In eq (5.15), σ_xp² is stated to grow as e^{6n}; the paper should state explicitly that this growth is in units with H and z0 held fixed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the superfluid equations are derived from the Schrödinger equation and the Starobinsky diffusion equation is re-derived in an appendix, not assumed.

full rationale

The derivation of the coarse-grained superfluid equations is self-contained: eqs. (3.12) and (3.13) follow from the Madelung decomposition (2.9) applied to the functional Schrödinger equation (2.7)-(2.8), together with the coarse-graining definitions (3.1)-(3.5). No parameter is fitted to data, and the target equations are not used as inputs. The Starobinsky diffusion equation (3.18) is not merely cited as an established result; Appendix A re-derives it from the Gaussian wavefunction ansatz, and the resulting noise and drift coefficients (3.19)-(3.20) and (A.12)-(A.13) match the standard expressions. The self-citations, including refs. [10,19,43] for the diffusion equation and [68,69] for the brief ultra-slow-roll phase, are contextual rather than load-bearing, because the key supporting result is re-derived inside the paper. Section 6 is explicitly heuristic, stating that it does not proceed from first principles but from 'the heuristic manipulation of coarse-grained stochastic equations, whose structure we assume,' so its phenomenological character is disclosed rather than disguised. The possible boundary-term issue with the time-dependent cutoff in Section 3.1, if real, would be a correctness concern about the coarse-graining step, not a circularity: it would not make the derived equations equivalent to their inputs by definition. Overall, the central claim is an internally derived reformulation of standard stochastic inflation, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction and no essential result borrowed only from the author's prior work.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the free-field action and Schrödinger equation, with no new entities. The heuristic section introduces a viscosity coefficient, but it is explicitly phenomenological and does not affect the central derivation.

free parameters (1)
  • viscosity coefficient η(n,φ)
    Introduced in the heuristic dissipative extension of Section 6 (eq (6.8)). Its functional form is left unspecified, so the dissipative results are not predictive until η is determined by a physical model.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The quadratic action (2.1) for free scalar Fourier modes with pump field z(τ) captures the inflationary fluctuations of interest (curvature perturbations, or scalar/tensor fluctuations in de Sitter).
    Starting point of Section 2; restricts the analysis to free, Gaussian systems, with interactions left to future work.
  • domain assumption Bunch-Davies initial conditions and Wronskian normalization for the mode functions φ_k.
    Stated in Section 2 after eq (2.2); selects the vacuum state and fixes mode amplitudes.
  • standard math The Madelung decomposition (2.9) is valid with real amplitude and phase.
    Standard representation; for the Gaussian states considered here the decomposition is well-defined.
  • domain assumption Coarse-grained quantities (3.1)-(3.2) capture all relevant superhorizon dynamics, and sub-horizon modes act only through noise, drift, and the K(n) force.
    Core coarse-graining ansatz of Section 3.1; underpins the closure of the superfluid equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stochastic inflation as a superfluid." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FVI6MX4L

@misc{pith2026250603860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stochastic inflation as a superfluid},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FVI6MX4L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.03860}
}
read the original abstract

We point out that inflationary superhorizon fluctuations can be effectively described by a set of equations analogous to those governing a superfluid. This is achieved through a functional Schr\"odinger approach to the evolution of the inflationary wavefunction, combined with a suitable coarse-graining procedure to capture large-scale dynamics. The irrotational fluid velocity is proportional to the gradient of the wavefunction phase. Marginalizing over short superhorizon modes introduces an external force acting on the fluid velocity. The quantum pressure characteristic of the superfluid plays a role in scenarios involving an ultra-slow-roll phase of inflation. Our superfluid framework is consistent with the standard Starobinsky approach to stochastic inflation while offering complementary insights, particularly by providing more precise information on the phase of the inflationary wavefunction. We also discuss a heuristic approach to include dissipative effects in this description.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Stochastic inflation from a non-equilibrium renormalization group

    hep-th 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Stochastic inflation is the leading infrared limit of a coarse-grained Schwinger–Keldysh effective theory, and the same Fokker–Planck dynamics follows from a Polchinski-type renormalization-group flow for the reduced ...

  2. Stochastic inflation as an open quantum system

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Stochastic inflation emerges from an open-quantum-system derivation, with a Lindblad master equation that reduces to and corrects Starobinsky's Fokker-Planck equation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “STOCHASTIC DE SITTER (INFLATIONARY) STAGE IN THE EARLY UNIVERSE,”Lect. Notes Phys.246(1986) 107–126

    1986

  2. [2]

    Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model,

    Y. Nambu and M. Sasaki, “Stochastic Stage of an Inflationary Universe Model,”Phys. Lett. B205(1988) 441–446

    1988

  3. [3]

    Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,

    A. A. Starobinsky and J. Yokoyama, “Equilibrium state of a selfinteracting scalar field in the De Sitter background,”Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 6357–6368, arXiv:astro-ph/9407016

    arXiv 1994

  4. [4]

    On the divergences of inflationary superhorizon perturbations,

    K. Enqvist, S. Nurmi, D. Podolsky, and G. I. Rigopoulos, “On the divergences of inflationary superhorizon perturbations,”JCAP04(2008) 025,arXiv:0802.0395 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2008

  5. [5]

    Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches,

    F. Finelli, G. Marozzi, A. A. Starobinsky, G. P. Vacca, and G. Venturi, “Generation of fluctuations during inflation: Comparison of stochastic and field-theoretic approaches,” Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 044007,arXiv:0808.1786 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2009

  6. [6]

    Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations,

    D. Polarski and A. A. Starobinsky, “Semiclassicality and decoherence of cosmological perturbations,”Classical and Quantum Gravity13no. 3, (Mar., 1996) 377–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/13/3/006

    doi:10.1088/0264-9381/13/3/006 1996

  7. [7]

    Quantum-to-classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe,

    C. Kiefer, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum-to-classical transition for fluctuations in the early universe,”International Journal of Modern Physics D07no. 03, (June, 1998) 455–462.http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271898000292

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271898000292 1998

  8. [8]

    Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?,

    C. Kiefer and D. Polarski, “Why do cosmological perturbations look classical to us?,”Adv. Sci. Lett.2(2009) 164–173,arXiv:0810.0087 [astro-ph]

    arXiv 2009

Show all 83 references
  1. [9]

    Shortcomings in the understanding of why cosmological perturbations look classical,

    D. Sudarsky, “Shortcomings in the understanding of why cosmological perturbations look classical,”International Journal of Modern Physics D20no. 04, (Apr., 2011) 509–552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0218271811018937

    2011 doi

  2. [10]

    EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Tasinato, and M. Williams, “EFT Beyond the Horizon: Stochastic Inflation and How Primordial Quantum Fluctuations Go Classical,”JHEP03 (2015) 090,arXiv:1408.5002 [hep-th]. – 18 –

    2015 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that cmb anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin?

    J. Martin and V. Vennin, “Quantum discord of cosmic inflation: Can we show that cmb anisotropies are of quantum-mechanical origin?”Physical Review D93no. 2, (Jan., 2016) . http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.93.023505

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Discord and decoherence,

    J. Martin, A. Micheli, and V. Vennin, “Discord and decoherence,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2022no. 04, (Apr., 2022) 051. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/051

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Real-space quantum-to-classical transition of time dependent background fluctuations,

    S. M. Chandran, K. Rajeev, and S. Shankaranarayanan, “Real-space quantum-to-classical transition of time dependent background fluctuations,”Physical Review D109no. 2, (Jan.,

  6. [14]

    Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes

    V. Vennin,Stochastic inflation and primordial black holes. PhD thesis, U. Paris-Saclay, 6, 2020.arXiv:2009.08715 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Green,EFT for de Sitter Space

    D. Green,EFT for de Sitter Space. 2023.arXiv:2210.05820 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Gravity, Horizons and Open EFTs,

    C. P. Burgess and G. Kaplanek, “Gravity, Horizons and Open EFTs,” arXiv:2212.09157 [hep-th]

    arXiv

  9. [17]

    The Quantum Mechanics of the Scalar Field in the New Inflationary Universe,

    A. H. Guth and S.-Y. Pi, “The Quantum Mechanics of the Scalar Field in the New Inflationary Universe,”Phys. Rev. D32(1985) 1899–1920

    1985

  10. [18]

    Schrodinger Picture Field Theory in Robertson-walker Flat Space-times,

    J. Guven, B. Lieberman, and C. T. Hill, “Schrodinger Picture Field Theory in Robertson-walker Flat Space-times,”Phys. Rev. D39(1989) 438

    1989

  11. [19]

    Open EFTs, IR effects\& late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and G. Tasinato, “Open EFTs, IR effects\& late-time resummations: systematic corrections in stochastic inflation,”JHEP01(2016) 153, arXiv:1512.00169 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form,

    E. Madelung, “Quantentheorie in hydrodynamischer Form,”Z. Phys.40no. 3, (1927) 322–326

    1927

  13. [21]

    Horizon crossing and inflation with large eta,

    W. H. Kinney, “Horizon crossing and inflation with large eta,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 023515,arXiv:gr-qc/0503017

    2005 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Inflationary perturbations near horizon crossing,

    S. M. Leach and A. R. Liddle, “Inflationary perturbations near horizon crossing,”Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 043508,arXiv:astro-ph/0010082

    2001 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Enhancement of superhorizon scale inflationary curvature perturbations,

    S. M. Leach, M. Sasaki, D. Wands, and A. R. Liddle, “Enhancement of superhorizon scale inflationary curvature perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 023512, arXiv:astro-ph/0101406

    2001 arXiv

  16. [24]

    R. P. Feynman, R. B. Leighton, and M. Sands,The Feynman lectures on physics; New millennium ed.Basic Books, New York, NY, 2010. https://cds.cern.ch/record/1494701. Originally published 1963-1965

    2010

  17. [25]

    Using the Schrodinger equation to simulate collisionless matter,

    L. M. Widrow and N. Kaiser, “Using the Schrodinger equation to simulate collisionless matter,”Astrophys. J. Lett.416(1993) L71–L74

    1993

  18. [26]

    Schr¨ odinger method asN-body double and UV completion of dust,

    C. Uhlemann, M. Kopp, and T. Haugg, “Schr¨ odinger method asN-body double and UV completion of dust,”Phys. Rev. D90no. 2, (2014) 023517,arXiv:1403.5567 [astro-ph.CO]. – 19 –

    2014 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 4, (2017) 043541,arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    The Schr¨ odinger-Poisson method for Large-Scale Structure,

    M. Garny, T. Konstandin, and H. Rubira, “The Schr¨ odinger-Poisson method for Large-Scale Structure,”JCAP04(2020) 003,arXiv:1911.04505 [astro-ph.CO]

    2020 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Wave Dark Matter,

    L. Hui, “Wave Dark Matter,”Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.59(2021) 247–289, arXiv:2101.11735 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Ultra-light dark matter,

    E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,”Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29no. 1, (2021) 7, arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales,

    D. Wands, K. A. Malik, D. H. Lyth, and A. R. Liddle, “A New approach to the evolution of cosmological perturbations on large scales,”Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 043527, arXiv:astro-ph/0003278

    2000 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models,

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, “Nonlinear evolution of long wavelength metric fluctuations in inflationary models,”Phys. Rev. D42(1990) 3936–3962

    1990

  25. [33]

    A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, “A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,”Prog. Theor. Phys.95(1996) 71–78, arXiv:astro-ph/9507001

    1996 arXiv

  26. [34]

    The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations,

    G. I. Rigopoulos and E. P. S. Shellard, “The separate universe approach and the evolution of nonlinear superhorizon cosmological perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 123518, arXiv:astro-ph/0306620

    2003 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations. II. A Single scalar field,

    Y. Tanaka and M. Sasaki, “Gradient expansion approach to nonlinear superhorizon perturbations. II. A Single scalar field,”Prog. Theor. Phys.118(2007) 455–473, arXiv:0706.0678 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Stochastic Inflation Revisited: Non-Slow Roll Statistics and DBI Inflation,

    A. J. Tolley and M. Wyman, “Stochastic Inflation Revisited: Non-Slow Roll Statistics and DBI Inflation,”JCAP04(2008) 028,arXiv:0801.1854 [hep-th]

    2008 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Coarse Grained Quantum Dynamics,

    C. Agon, V. Balasubramanian, S. Kasko, and A. Lawrence, “Coarse Grained Quantum Dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 2, (2018) 025019,arXiv:1412.3148 [hep-th]

    2018 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochastic attractor?,

    J. Grain and V. Vennin, “Stochastic inflation in phase space: Is slow roll a stochastic attractor?,”JCAP05(2017) 045,arXiv:1703.00447 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  31. [39]

    On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction,

    S. C´ espedes, A.-C. Davis, and D.-G. Wang, “On the IR divergences in de Sitter space: loops, resummation and the semi-classical wavefunction,”JHEP04(2024) 004, arXiv:2311.17990 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Stochastic inflation in general relativity,

    Y. L. Launay, G. I. Rigopoulos, and E. P. S. Shellard, “Stochastic inflation in general relativity,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 12, (2024) 123523,arXiv:2401.08530 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Stochastic inflation and nonlinear gravity,

    D. S. Salopek and J. R. Bond, “Stochastic inflation and nonlinear gravity,”Phys. Rev. D 43(1991) 1005–1031

    1991

  34. [42]

    Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation,

    V. Vennin and A. A. Starobinsky, “Correlation Functions in Stochastic Inflation,”Eur. Phys. J. C75(2015) 413,arXiv:1506.04732 [hep-th]. – 20 –

    2015 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Stochastic approach to gravitational waves from inflation,

    G. Tasinato, “Stochastic approach to gravitational waves from inflation,”Phys. Rev. D 105no. 2, (2022) 023521,arXiv:2201.10333 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Classical Perturbations From Decoherence of Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,

    R. H. Brandenberger, R. Laflamme, and M. Mijic, “Classical Perturbations From Decoherence of Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,”Mod. Phys. Lett. A5 (1990) 2311–2318

    1990

  37. [45]

    Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe,

    E. Calzetta and B. L. Hu, “Quantum fluctuations, decoherence of the mean field, and structure formation in the early universe,”Phys. Rev. D52(1995) 6770–6788, arXiv:gr-qc/9505046

    1995 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,

    J. Lesgourgues, D. Polarski, and A. A. Starobinsky, “Quantum to classical transition of cosmological perturbations for nonvacuum initial states,”Nucl. Phys. B497(1997) 479–510,arXiv:gr-qc/9611019

    1997 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Influence functional approach to decoherence during inflation,

    F. C. Lombardo, “Influence functional approach to decoherence during inflation,”Braz. J. Phys.35(2005) 391–396,arXiv:gr-qc/0412069

    2005 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, and D. Hoover, “Decoherence of inflationary primordial fluctuations,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063534,arXiv:astro-ph/0601646

    2008 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Decoherence due to the Horizon after Inflation,

    J. W. Sharman and G. D. Moore, “Decoherence due to the Horizon after Inflation,”JCAP 11(2007) 020,arXiv:0708.3353 [gr-qc]

    2007 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Quantum Decoherence During Inflation from Gravitational Nonlinearities,

    E. Nelson, “Quantum Decoherence During Inflation from Gravitational Nonlinearities,” JCAP03(2016) 022,arXiv:1601.03734 [gr-qc]

    2016 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Decoherence, discord and the quantum master equation for cosmological perturbations,

    T. J. Hollowood and J. I. McDonald, “Decoherence, discord and the quantum master equation for cosmological perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 10, (2017) 103521, arXiv:1701.02235 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Minimal decoherence from inflation,

    C. P. Burgess, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek, J. Martin, and V. Vennin, “Minimal decoherence from inflation,”JCAP07(2023) 022,arXiv:2211.11046 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Observational constraints on quantum decoherence during inflation,

    J. Martin and V. Vennin, “Observational constraints on quantum decoherence during inflation,”JCAP05(2018) 063,arXiv:1801.09949 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Quantum recoherence in the early universe,

    T. Colas, J. Grain, and V. Vennin, “Quantum recoherence in the early universe,”EPL142 no. 6, (2023) 69002,arXiv:2212.09486 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Cosmic decoherence: primordial power spectra and non-Gaussianities,

    A. Daddi Hammou and N. Bartolo, “Cosmic decoherence: primordial power spectra and non-Gaussianities,”JCAP04(2023) 055,arXiv:2211.07598 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Cosmic purity lost: perturbative and resummed late-time inflationary decoherence,

    C. Burgess, T. Colas, R. Holman, G. Kaplanek, and V. Vennin, “Cosmic purity lost: perturbative and resummed late-time inflationary decoherence,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2024no. 08, (Aug., 2024) 042. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/08/042

    2024 doi

  49. [57]

    Quantum signatures and decoherence during inflation from deep subhorizon perturbations,

    F. Lopez and N. Bartolo, “Quantum signatures and decoherence during inflation from deep subhorizon perturbations,”arXiv:2503.23150 [astro-ph.CO]. – 21 –

    arXiv

  50. [58]

    Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,

    C. Pattison, V. Vennin, H. Assadullahi, and D. Wands, “Quantum diffusion during inflation and primordial black holes,”JCAP10(2017) 046, arXiv:1707.00537 [hep-th]

    2017 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Quantum diffusion beyond slow-roll: implications for primordial black-hole production,

    J. M. Ezquiaga and J. Garc ´ ıa-Bellido, “Quantum diffusion beyond slow-roll: implications for primordial black-hole production,”JCAP08(2018) 018,arXiv:1805.06731 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion,

    M. Biagetti, G. Franciolini, A. Kehagias, and A. Riotto, “Primordial Black Holes from Inflation and Quantum Diffusion,”JCAP07(2018) 032,arXiv:1804.07124 [astro-ph.CO]

    2018 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,

    D. G. Figueroa, S. Raatikainen, S. Rasanen, and E. Tomberg, “Non-Gaussian Tail of the Curvature Perturbation in Stochastic Ultraslow-Roll Inflation: Implications for Primordial Black Hole Production,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127no. 10, (2021) 101302,arXiv:2012.06551 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  54. [62]

    The hand-made tail: non-perturbative tails from multifield inflation,

    A. Achucarro, S. Cespedes, A.-C. Davis, and G. A. Palma, “The hand-made tail: non-perturbative tails from multifield inflation,”JHEP05(2022) 052, arXiv:2112.14712 [hep-th]

    2022 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation,

    Y.-F. Cai, X.-H. Ma, M. Sasaki, D.-G. Wang, and Z. Zhou, “Highly non-Gaussian tails and primordial black holes from single-field inflation,”JCAP12(2022) 034, arXiv:2207.11910 [astro-ph.CO]

    2022 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling,

    C. Animali and V. Vennin, “Primordial black holes from stochastic tunnelling,”JCAP02 (2023) 043,arXiv:2210.03812 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  57. [65]

    Tail diversity from inflation,

    S. Hooshangi, M. H. Namjoo, and M. Noorbala, “Tail diversity from inflation,”JCAP09 (2023) 023,arXiv:2305.19257 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Vennin and D

    V. Vennin and D. Wands,Quantum Diffusion and Large Primordial Perturbations from Inflation. 2025.arXiv:2402.12672 [astro-ph.CO]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [67]

    Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,

    O. ¨Ozsoy and G. Tasinato, “Inflation and Primordial Black Holes,”Universe9no. 5, (2023) 203,arXiv:2301.03600 [astro-ph.CO]

    2023 arXiv

  60. [68]

    An analytic approach to non-slow-roll inflation,

    G. Tasinato, “An analytic approach to non-slow-roll inflation,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 2, (2021) 023535,arXiv:2012.02518 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Large —η— approach to single field inflation,

    G. Tasinato, “Large —η— approach to single field inflation,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 4, (2023) 043526,arXiv:2305.11568 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals,

    M. Hillery, R. F. O’Connell, M. O. Scully, and E. P. Wigner, “Distribution functions in physics: Fundamentals,”Phys. Rept.106(1984) 121–167

    1984

  63. [71]

    Stochastic inflation: The Quantum phase space approach,

    S. Habib, “Stochastic inflation: The Quantum phase space approach,”Phys. Rev. D46 (1992) 2408–2427,arXiv:gr-qc/9208006

    1992 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Von Neumann entropy, mutual information and total correlations of Gaussian states,

    A. Serafini, F. Illuminati, and S. De Siena, “Von Neumann entropy, mutual information and total correlations of Gaussian states,”J. Phys. B37(2004) L21, arXiv:quant-ph/0307073. – 22 –

    2004 arXiv

  65. [73]

    L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifshitz, J. B. Sykes, and W. H. Reid,Fluid Mechanics. Pergamon Press Oxford, England, 1959

    1959

  66. [74]

    H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione,The theory of Open Quantum Systems. Oxford University Press, 2002

    2002

  67. [75]

    E. A. Calzetta and B.-L. B. Hu,Nonequilibrium Quantum Field Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Sept., 2008

    2008

  68. [76]

    Effective Field Theory out of Equilibrium: Brownian quantum fields,

    D. Boyanovsky, “Effective Field Theory out of Equilibrium: Brownian quantum fields,” New J. Phys.17no. 6, (2015) 063017,arXiv:1503.00156 [hep-ph]

    2015 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Effective field theory during inflation: Reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation,

    D. Boyanovsky, “Effective field theory during inflation: Reduced density matrix and its quantum master equation,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 2, (2015) 023527,arXiv:1506.07395 [astro-ph.CO]

    2015 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Effective field theory during inflation. II. Stochastic dynamics and power spectrum suppression,

    D. Boyanovsky, “Effective field theory during inflation. II. Stochastic dynamics and power spectrum suppression,”Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 043501,arXiv:1511.06649 [astro-ph.CO]

    2016 arXiv

  71. [79]

    C. P. Burgess,Introduction to Effective Field Theory. Cambridge University Press, Dec., 2020

    2020

  72. [80]

    Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for primordial cosmology : dissipation, decoherence and late-time resummation of cosmological inhomogeneities

    T. Colas,Open Effective Field Theories for primordial cosmology : dissipation, decoherence and late-time resummation of cosmological inhomogeneities. PhD thesis, Institut d’astrophysique spatiale, France, AstroParticule et Cosmologie, France, APC, Paris, 2023

    2023

  73. [81]

    The open effective field theory of inflation,

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas, and E. Pajer, “The open effective field theory of inflation,”JHEP 10(2024) 248,arXiv:2404.15416 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium,

    S. A. Salcedo, T. Colas, and E. Pajer, “An Open Effective Field Theory for light in a medium,”JHEP03(2025) 138,arXiv:2412.12299 [hep-th]. – 23 –

    2025 arXiv

  75. [2024]

    http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.023503

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.