Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 84 references

On explicit formulae of LMOV invariants

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-14 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Closed-form formulas give the LMOV invariants of the framed unknot for every integer framing.

desk verdict The paper's advertised multi-hole formula (29) inverts its own equation (7) with the wrong exponent, and the annulus reduction to the a=0 curve is unproved; the clean disc-counting derivation does not rescue the paper as it stands. read the letter →

arxiv 1908.08653 v2 pith:FXMQWZ2X submitted 2019-08-23 hep-th math-phmath.MP

Shengmao Zhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.MP
keywords LMOVinvariantsframedunknotresolvedconifoldAV-branemirrorcurveBergmannkerneltopologicalstringsChern-Simonstheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives closed-form expressions for the Labastida–Mariño–Ooguri–Vafa (LMOV) invariants of the resolved conifold with one framed brane, equivalently the framed unknot in $S^3$. The point is that, although open-string integrality invariants are usually hard to compute, for this model each sector collapses to explicit sums of binomial coefficients and Möbius functions. A reader should care because these integers count BPS domain walls, and explicit formulas make their integrality, growth, and distribution directly checkable. The formulas cover the disc (one hole, genus 0), the annulus (two holes, genus 0), multi-hole genus-0 invariants at degree $|\mu|/2$, and higher-genus one-hole invariants through a single polynomial $g_m(q,a)$.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the mirror curve of the framed unknot, obtained from the noncommutative $a$-deformed $A$-polynomial as $y-1-a^{-1/2}(-1)^{\tau}x y^{\tau}(ay-1)=0$, rewritten as $Y=X(1-Y)^{\tau}(1-a(1-Y))$. The disc count comes from expanding $Y$ by Lagrangian inversion and comparing with the multiple-cover formula; the annulus comes from the Bergmann kernel of this curve, specifically from $\log((Y_2-Y_1)/(X_2-X_1))$, using a Hodge-integral lemma at the special degree $l=(m_1+m_2)/2$; the multi-hole genus-zero counts use the Hodge integral formula (15); and the higher-genus one-hole invariants are extracted from a Möbius-modified Chern–Simons free energy. Möbius inversion is the step that turns each generating-function coefficient into the desired integer invariant.

What would settle it

Take the full mirror curve $Y=X(1-Y)^{\tau}(1-a(1-Y))$, compute the Bergmann-kernel coefficient of $X_1^{m_1}X_2^{m_2}a^{(m_1+m_2)/2}$ in $\log((Y_2-Y_1)/(X_2-X_1))$ for small values such as $(m_1,m_2,\tau)=(1,1,0)$, $(1,2,1)$, and $(2,2,-1)$, and compare with formula (27). Any nonzero contribution from the $a$-dependent factor at that degree would overturn the annulus formula; equality would support the reduction.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that all LMOV invariants of the resolved conifold with one framed brane, equivalently of the framed unknot with framing $\tau\in\mathbb{Z}$, are given by explicit closed formulae rather than by an infinite recursive process. For the disc sector, $n_{m,l}(\tau)=\sum_{d|m,\,d|l}\frac{\mu(d)}{d^2}c_{m/d,l/d}(\tau)$ with $c_{m,l}(\tau)=-\frac{(-1)^{m\tau+m+l}}{m^2}\binom{m}{l}\binom{m\tau+l-1}{m-1}$. For the annulus at degree $l=(m_1+m_2)/2$, $n_{(m_1,m_2)}(\tau)=\frac{1}{m_1+m_2}\sum_{d|m_1,\,d|m_2}\mu(d)(-1)^{(m_1+m_2)(\tau+1)/d}\binom{(m_1\tau+m_1)/d-1}{m_1/d}\binom{(m_2\tau+m_2)/d}{m_2/d}$. For three or more holes at degree $|\mu|/2$, the invariant is a Möbius sum over the explicit product $K^\tau_{\mu,0,|\mu|/2}=(-1)^{|\mu|\tau}[\tau(\tau+1)]^{l(\mu)-1}\prod_i\binom{\mu_i(\tau+1)-1}{\mu_i-1}(\sum_i\mu_i)^{l(\mu)-3}$. For higher genus with one hole, the invariants are coefficients of $g_m(q,a)=\sum_{d|m}\mu(d)Z_{m/d}(q^d,a^d)$, where $Z_m$ is built from colored HOMFLY-PT invariants of the unknot. Integrality of all these numbers was proved in a separate paper, so the contribution here is the closed-form evaluation.

Load-bearing premise

The annulus formula depends on the unproved step in Section 4.3 that, at degree $l=(m_1+m_2)/2$, only the reduced curve $Y=X(1-Y)^{\tau}$ contributes and all $a$-dependent terms in the full mirror curve can be ignored.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every integer framing $\tau$, the disc invariants $n_{m,l}(\tau)$ are computable in finitely many binomial terms, and the companion paper proves they are integers.
  • The annulus invariant $n_{(m_1,m_2)}(\tau)$ at the special degree is explicit and integer for all $m_1,m_2\ge1$ and all $\tau\in\mathbb{Z}$.
  • Every genus-zero invariant with three or more holes at degree $|\mu|/2$ is visibly integral because the product $K^\tau_{\mu,0,|\mu|/2}$ is an integer and $l(\mu)\ge3$.
  • Higher-genus one-hole invariants can be read off coefficient by coefficient from the fixed polynomial $g_m(q,a)\in z^{-2}\mathbb{Z}[z^2,a^{\pm1/2}]$, giving a finite algorithm rather than a recursion.
  • The explicit formulae make the LMOV integrality conjecture for the framed unknot checkable sector by sector without computing open Gromov-Witten invariants directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Möbius-plus-binomial structure should extend to any strip geometry behind an AV-brane, since the recently proposed strip-geometry disc formula specializes to the conifold formula used here.
  • If these formulas are right, the observed Gaussian/binomial distribution of LMOV numbers for large representations becomes a provable asymptotic statement for the framed unknot, obtained by analyzing these binomial sums rather than by numerical experiment.
  • The unproved $a=0$ reduction in the annulus sector is directly testable: one can compute the Bergmann-kernel annulus amplitude for the full curve at the same degree and check whether the $a$-dependent terms cancel.
  • Because the open-string partition function of the framed unknot was previously related to a quiver cohomological Hall algebra, these explicit invariants may also give closed-form characters in quiver representation theory.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies open-string LMOV invariants for the resolved conifold with one Aganagic-Vafa brane in integer framing, i.e. for the framed unknot in S^3. Using the mirror curve obtained from the q-holonomic recursion for colored HOMFLY-PT invariants, the author derives explicit formulas for genus-zero one-hole (disc) invariants by Lagrange inversion, for genus-zero two-hole (annulus) invariants from the Bergmann kernel, for genus-zero multi-hole invariants at Q=|mu|/2 from a Hodge integral formula, and for higher-genus one-hole invariants from the Chern-Simons partition function via the large-N duality proved by Zhou [79]. The stated results are the disc formula (24), the annulus formula (27), the multi-hole formula (29), and the generating-function formula (33); integrality of the disc and annulus invariants is asserted to be proved in the companion paper [56].

Significance. If the formulas are correct, the paper provides closed-form expressions for a substantial class of LMOV invariants of the framed unknot in arbitrary integer framing, giving explicit data that could be used to test structural conjectures such as the Gaussian-distribution conjecture of Mironov-Morozov-Sleptsov [61]. The derivations are direct rather than fitting-based: the disc invariants are obtained from the mirror curve by Lagrange inversion, the annulus coefficient is read from a Bergmann-kernel expansion, and the higher-genus one-hole invariants are extracted from the Chern-Simons free energy by Möbius inversion. These are real strengths. However, the paper is not self-contained: the key integrality statements are imported from [56], Lemma 4.5 is imported from [80], and the multi-hole formula as displayed contains a Möbius-inversion error that changes the numerical values of the invariants. The annulus derivation also contains an unproved reduction from the full mirror curve to its a=0 part. Because these points affect the central formulas, the paper needs substantial revision before the claims can be accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [§4.4, Eq. (29)] The Möbius inversion in Eq. (29) uses the wrong power of d. Formula (7) states K_{\mu,0,Q} = \sum_{d|\mu} (-1)^{l(\mu)} d^{l(\mu)-3} n_{\mu/d,0,Q/d}. Since l(\mu/d)=l(\mu), inverting this relation gives n_{\mu,0,Q} = (-1)^{l(\mu)} \sum_{d|\mu} \mu(d) d^{l(\mu)-3} K_{\mu/d,0,Q/d}. The exponent l(\mu)-1 appearing in Eq. (29) is the power that appears in the unexpanded multiple-covering formula (6) before (2\sin(dg_s/2))^{-2} is expanded; after that expansion the correct power is l(\mu)-3. The difference is numerically significant: for l(\mu)=3 the correct factor is d^0, while Eq. (29) inserts d^2. Thus the displayed multi-hole formula (29) is incorrect as written. The integrality conclusion n_{\mu,0,|\mu|/2}\in\mathbb{Z} still follows from Eq. (28) with the corrected exponent, but the explicit formula and the statements in the abstract that rely on it must be revised.
  2. [§4.3] The reduction 'when l=(m1+m2)/2, we only need to consider the curve Y=X(1-Y)^\tau' is asserted without proof. In the full mirror curve (20), Y = X(1-Y)^\tau(1-a(1-Y)), and the coefficient of a^{(m1+m2)/2} in the expansion of \log((Y_1-Y_2)/(X_1-X_2)) can in principle receive contributions from several b_{n,i} factors whose a-degrees sum to (m1+m2)/2. No degree bound or cancellation argument is given to justify keeping only the a=0 curve. Since formula (27) is obtained precisely from this reduction together with Lemma 4.5, the annulus formula and the resulting invariants n_{(m1,m2)}(\tau) are not established as written. The authors need to prove the reduction, or alternatively compute the coefficient from the full curve and verify that the higher-a terms cancel.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§4.3] The index conventions around b_{n,i} and \tilde b_{m,l} are unclear: the displayed b_{n,i} appears to be the coefficient of X^{n+1} rather than X^n, and the definition \tilde b_m = \sum_l \tilde b_{m,l} a^l with \tilde b_{m,l}=\sum_{i=0}^l b_{m,i} seems to introduce an extra factor 1/(1-a). Please clarify these definitions and check the resulting expansion.
  2. [§4.4] After correcting Eq. (29), the sentence 'since l(\mu)\ge 3, it is clear that n...' should be reworded, because the integrality argument with the corrected exponent uses the same integrality of K but the displayed formula changes.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos and infelicities: 'Agangica-Vafa' in the Introduction, 'Revist' in the heading of §4.5.1, 'finial' in the Conclusions, and 'Möbius' is sometimes written without the umlaut. The reference [28] is incomplete as printed.
  4. [§4.5.2] Formula (33) is an algorithmic coefficient-extraction formula rather than a closed form; the paper should state clearly that for higher genus the result is a generating-function characterization, not an explicit binomial-type expression.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity found: the explicit LMOV formulae are coefficient extractions from known Chern-Simons, Hodge, and mirror-curve identities; the two flagged issues are unproved reductions and an algebraic exponent slip, not circularity.

full rationale

The derivations in Sections 4.2-4.5 are self-contained rearrangements of known identities rather than fits or definitions of the target quantities. The disc formula (24) follows from the mirror curve (20) by Lagrangian inversion and then by the explicit Möbius inversion of the multiple-covering relation (7); no parameter is fitted and no predicted quantity is inserted by hand. The annulus formula (27) uses Lemma 4.5 quoted from the author's own paper [80], but that lemma is a stated Hodge-integral identity with an independent published proof, so the self-citation is supporting evidence rather than a circular load. The higher-genus formula (33) defines n_{m,g,Q} as coefficients of g_m(q,a), which is exactly the content of Conjecture 4.7, and the integrality of these coefficients is cited to the separate paper [56]; this is a legitimate division of labor, not a reduction of the claim to its own input. Two weaknesses are flagged here for completeness but are outside the circularity score: Section 4.3 states without proof that 'when l=(m1+m2)/2, we only need to consider the curve Y=X(1-Y)^tau,' a load-bearing reduction from the full curve (20); and Section 4.4 says 'By using formula (7), we get' equation (29), yet formula (7) carries the factor d^{l(mu)-3}, so the Möbius inversion of (7) would give exponent l(mu)-3 rather than the written l(mu)-1. These are internal-consistency and rigor gaps, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper does not introduce new physical entities or fitted constants. It relies on the LMOV expansion structure, the proved BKMP correspondence, and two external lemmas. The only ad hoc element is the unproved reduction to the a=0 curve in the annulus computation.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The open string partition function satisfies the LMOV integral expansion (6) with integer invariants n_{mu,g,Q}.
    This is the defining structure of LMOV invariants; for the framed unknot the integrality is proved in [56], which the paper cites instead of reproving.
  • domain assumption The BKMP construction equates F(0,1) with the integral of log y over x and gives the Bergmann kernel expansion for higher holes.
    The paper invokes the BKMP conjecture as proved in [16,20] without reproducing the proof.
  • standard math Lemma 4.3 (Lagrange inversion) and Lemma 4.5 (the two-partition Hodge integral identity from [80]) are valid.
    Lagrange inversion is standard; Lemma 4.5 is a proved theorem from the author's earlier paper, cited without proof here.
  • ad hoc to paper For l=(m1+m2)/2, only the a=0 curve contributes to the annulus coefficient.
    Stated without proof in Section 4.3; it is essential for the annulus formula and is not derived.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On explicit formulae of LMOV invariants." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FXMQWZ2X

@misc{pith2026190808653,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On explicit formulae of LMOV invariants},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FXMQWZ2X}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:1908.08653}
}
abstract

We started a program to study the open string integrality invariants (LMOV invariants) for toric Calabi-Yau 3-folds with Aganagic-Vafa brane (AV-brane) several years ago. This paper is devoted to the case of resolved conifold with one out AV-brane in any integer framing $\tau$, which is the large $N$ duality of Chern-Simons theory for a framed unknot with integer framing $\tau$ in $S^3$. By using the methods from string dualities, we compute several explicit formulae of the corresponding LMOV invariants for this special model, whose integrality properties have been proved in a separated paper.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [56]

    Luo and S

    W. Luo and S. Zhu, Integrality of the LMOV invariants for framed unknot, Communications in Number Theory and Physics, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2019), pp. 81-100

    work page 2019

  2. [69]

    Panfil and P

    M. Panfil and P. Sulkowski, Topological strings, strips and quivers , JHEP 2019, 124. arXiv:1811.03556

    arXiv 2019

  3. [79]

    Zhou, A proof of the full Mariño-Vafa conjecture

    J. Zhou, A proof of the full Mariño-Vafa conjecture . Math. Res. Lett. 17 (2010), no. 6, 1091-1099

    work page 2010

  4. [61]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, An. Morozov and A. Sleptsov, Gaussian distribution of LMOV numbers , Nuclear Physics. B 924 (2017) 1-32. arXiv:1706.00761

    arXiv 2017

  5. [80]

    Zhu, Hodge Integral Identities from the Cut-and-Join Equation o f Mariño-Vafa formula

    S. Zhu, Hodge Integral Identities from the Cut-and-Join Equation o f Mariño-Vafa formula. Pure Appl. Math. Q. 8 (2012), no. 4, 1147-1177

    work page 2012

  6. [1]

    Aganagic and C

    A. Aganagic and C. Vafa, Mirror symmetry, D-branes and counting holomorphic discs . arXiv: hep-th/0012041. 25

    arXiv

  7. [2]

    Aganagic and C

    A. Aganagic and C. Vafa, Large N Duality, Mirror Symmetry, and a Q-deformed A-polynomial for Knots , arXiv: 1204.4709

    arXiv

  8. [3]

    Aganagic, A

    A. Aganagic, A. Klemm, C. Vafa, Disk instantons, mirror symmetry and the duality web . Z. Naturforsch. A. 57(1-2), 1-28 (2002)

    2002

Show all 84 references
  1. [4]

    Aganagic, A

    M. Aganagic, A. Klemm, M. Mariño and C. Vafa, The topological ver- tex, Comm. Math. Phys. 254 (2005), no. 2, 425-478

    2005

  2. [5]

    Aganagic, M

    M. Aganagic, M. Marino, C. Vafa, All loop topological string amplitudes from Chern-Simons theory. Commun. Math. Phys. 247, 467-512 (2004)

    2004

  3. [6]

    Aganagic, T

    M. Aganagic, T. Ekholm, L. Ng, and C. Vafa, Topological strings, D- model, and knot contact homology , Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 18 (2014), no. 4, 827-956

    2014

  4. [7]

    Bershadsky, S

    M. Bershadsky, S. Cecotti, H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, Kodaira-Spencer theory of gravity and exact results for quantum string ampli tudes, Comm. Math. Phys. 165(2) (1994) 311-427

    1994

  5. [8]

    Behrend and B

    K. Behrend and B. Fantechi, The intrinsic normal cone , Invent. Math. 128 (1997) 45-88

    1997

  6. [9]

    Bouchard, A

    V. Bouchard, A. Klemm, M. Mariño, and S. Pasquetti, Remodeling the B-model, Commun. Math. Phys. 287, 117-178 (2009)

    2009

  7. [10]

    Q. Chen, K. Liu, P. Peng and S. Zhu, Congruent skein relations for colored HOMFLY-PT invariants and colored Jones polynom ials, arxiv:1402.3571v3

    arXiv

  8. [11]

    Chern and J

    S.-S. Chern and J. Simons, Characteristic forms and geometric invari- ants, Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974), 48-69

    1974

  9. [12]

    Chen and S

    Q. Chen and S. Zhu, Full Colored HOMFLYPT Invariants, Composite Invariants and Congruent Skein Relation , arXiv:1410.2211

    arXiv

  10. [13]

    Diaconescu, V

    D.-E. Diaconescu, V. Shende and C. Vafa, Large N duality, la- grangian cycles, and algebraic knots , Commun. Math.Phys.319(3),813- 863(2013)

    2013

  11. [14]

    Ekedahl, S

    T. Ekedahl, S. Lando, M. Shapiro and A. Vainshtein, Hurwitz numbers and intersections on moduli spaces of curves , Invent. Math. 146 no. 2, 297-327 (2001)

    2001

  12. [15]

    Eynard and N

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin, Invariants of algebraic curves and topolog- ical expansion, arXiv:math-ph/0702045. 26

    arXiv

  13. [16]

    Eynard and N

    E. Eynard and N. Orantin, Computation of open Gromov-Witten in- variants for toric Calabi- Yau 3-folds by topological recur sion, a proof of the BKMP conjecture , Comm. Math. Phys. 337 (2015), no. 2, 483- 567

    2015

  14. [17]

    H. Fuji, S. Gukov, P. Sulkowski, H. Awata, Volume Conjecture: Refined and Categorified , Adv.Theor.Math.Phys. 16 (2012) 1669-1777

    2012

  15. [18]

    H. Fuji, S. Gukov, P. Sulkowski, Super-A-polynomial for knots and BPS states , Nucl.Phys. B867 (2013) 506-546

    2013

  16. [19]

    Fang, C.-C., M Liu, Open Gromov-Witten invariants of toric Calabi- Yau 3-folds

    B. Fang, C.-C., M Liu, Open Gromov-Witten invariants of toric Calabi- Yau 3-folds. Commun. Math. Phys. 323(1), 285-328 (2013)

    2013

  17. [20]

    Fang, C.-C

    B. Fang, C.-C. M. Liu, and Z. Zong, On the remodeling conjecture for toric Calabi-Yau 3-orbifolds , arXiv:1604.07123

    arXiv

  18. [21]

    Garoufalidis, P

    S. Garoufalidis, P. Kucharski and P. Sulkowski, Knots, BPS states, and algebraic curves , Commun. Math. Phys. 346 (2016) 75-113

    2016

  19. [22]

    Garoufalidis and T.T.Q

    S. Garoufalidis and T.T.Q. Le, The colored Jones function is q- holonomic, Geom. and Topology 9 (2005) 1253-1293

    2005

  20. [23]

    Garoufalidis, A

    S. Garoufalidis, A. D. Lauda and Thang T.Q. Le, The colored HOM- FLYPT function is q -holonomic , arXiv: 1604.08502

    arXiv

  21. [24]

    Graber and R

    T. Graber and R. Pandharipande, Localization of virtual classes , In- vent. Math. 135 (1999), 487-518

    1999

  22. [25]

    Gopakumar, C

    R. Gopakumar, C. Vafa, M-Theory and Topological Strings-I , arXiv:hep-th/9809187

    arXiv

  23. [26]

    Gopakumar, C

    R. Gopakumar, C. Vafa, M-theory and topological strings-II, arXiv:hep- th/9812127

  24. [27]

    Gopakumar and C

    R. Gopakumar and C. Vafa, On the gauge theory/geometry correspon- dence, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(5) (1999) 1415-1443

    1999

  25. [28]

    G. H. Hardy, Ramanujan, Cambridge Univ. Press, London. 1940; reprinted by Chelsea, New York, 1959

    1940

  26. [29]

    K. Hori, S. Katz, A. Klemm, R. Pandharipande, R. Thomas, C. Vafa, R. Vakil and E. Zaslow, Mirror symmetry ,(Clay mathematics mono- graphs. 1)

  27. [30]

    Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli spaces of curves and the matrix

    M. Kontsevich, Intersection theory on the moduli spaces of curves and the matrix. Airy function , Comm. Math. Phys.,vol.147(1992),1-23. 27

    1992

  28. [31]

    Kontsevich, Enumeration of rational curves via torus actions , in The moduli space of curves, R

    M. Kontsevich, Enumeration of rational curves via torus actions , in The moduli space of curves, R. Dijkgraaf, C. Faber, and G. van der Geer, eds., Birkhauser, 1995, pp 335-368

    1995

  29. [32]

    Kontsevich, Y

    M. Kontsevich, Y. Soibelman, Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants , Commun. Number Theory Phys. 5 (2011), 231-352

    2011

  30. [33]

    Konishi, Integrality of Gopakumar-Vafa invariants of toric Calabi- Yau threefolds, Publ

    Y. Konishi, Integrality of Gopakumar-Vafa invariants of toric Calabi- Yau threefolds, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 42 (2006), no. 2, 605-648

    2006

  31. [34]

    Koshkin, Conormal bundles to knots and the Gopakumar-Vafa con- jecture

    S. Koshkin, Conormal bundles to knots and the Gopakumar-Vafa con- jecture. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 11(4), 591-634 (2007)

    2007

  32. [35]

    Katz, C.-C.M

    S. Katz, C.-C.M. Liu, Enumerative geometry of stable maps with La- grangian boundary conditions and multiple covers of the dis c. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5(1), 1-49 (2001)

    2001

  33. [36]

    Khmyk and K

    A. Khmyk and K. Schmudgen, Quantum groups and their representa- tion theory, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 1997

    1997

  34. [37]

    Kucharski, M

    P. Kucharski, M. Reineke, M. Stosic and P. Sulkowski, BPS states, knots and quivers , arXiv:1707.02991

    arXiv

  35. [38]

    Kucharski, M

    P. Kucharski, M. Reineke, M. Stosic and P. Sulkowski, Knots-quivers Correspondence, arXiv:1707.04017

    arXiv

  36. [39]

    Kucharski, P

    P. Kucharski, P. Sulkowski, BPS counting for knots and combinatorics on words, arXiv:1608.06600

    arXiv

  37. [40]

    Li, Some results of the Mariño-Vafa formula

    Y. Li, Some results of the Mariño-Vafa formula . Math. Res. Lett. 13 (2006), no. 5-6, 847-864

    2006

  38. [41]

    Li, C.-C

    J. Li, C.-C. Liu, K. Liu, J. Zhou, A mathematical theory of the topo- logical vertex, Geometry and Topology 13 (2009) 527-621

    2009

  39. [42]

    C.-C. Liu, K. Liu, J. Zhou, A proof of a conjecture of Mariño-Vafa on Hodge integrals, J. Differential Geom. 65(2003)

    2003

  40. [43]

    C.-C. Liu, K. Liu and J. Zhou, Mariño-Vafa formula and Hodge integral identities, J. Algebraic Geom. 15 (2006), no. 2, 379-398

    2006

  41. [44]

    C.-C. Liu, K. Liu, J. Zhou, A formula on two-partition Hodge integrals , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20 (2007), 149-184

    2007

  42. [45]

    Labastida and M

    J.M.F. Labastida and M. Mariño, Polynomial invariants for torus knots and topological strings Comm. Math. Phys. 217 (2001),no. 2, 423. 28

    2001

  43. [46]

    Labastida and M

    J.M.F. Labastida and M. Mariño, A new point of view in the theory of knot and link invariants J. Knot Theory Ramif. 11 (2002), 173

    2002

  44. [47]

    Labastida, M

    J.M.F. Labastida, M. Mariño and C. Vafa, Knots, links and branes at large N , J. High Energy Phys. 2000, no. 11, Paper 7

    2000

  45. [48]

    Liu and P

    K. Liu and P. Peng, Proof of the Labastida-Mariño-Ooguri-Vafa con- jecture. J. Differential Geom., 85(3):479-525, 2010

    2010

  46. [49]

    Liu and P

    K. Liu and P. Peng, New structures of knot invariants . Commun. Num- ber Theory Phys. 5 (2011), 601-615

    2011

  47. [50]

    Liu and P

    K. Liu and P. Peng, Framed knot and U (N ) Chern-Simons gauge the- ory, preprint

  48. [51]

    Li and Y

    J. Li and Y. Song, Open string instantons and relative stable mor- phisms. In: The interaction of finite-type and Gromov-Witten in- variants (BIRS 2003), Volume 8 of Geom. Topol.Monogr., Coven try: Geom. Topol. Publ., 2006, pp. 49-72

    2003

  49. [52]

    Li and G

    J. Li and G. Tian, Virtual moduli cycle and Gromov-Witten invariants of algebraic varieties , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 11, no. 1, (1998) 119-174

    1998

  50. [53]

    Lin and H

    X.-S. Lin and H. Zheng, On the Hecke algebra and the colored HOM- FLY polynomial, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 362 (2010), no. 1, 1-18

    2010

  51. [54]

    Liu and S

    K. Liu and S. Zhu, From Mariño-Vafa formula to Witten conjecture , Proceedings of the seventh ICCM, Advanced Lectures in Mathe matics Volume 43, 2019

    2019

  52. [55]

    Luo and S

    W. Luo and S. Zhu, Integrality structures in topological strings I: framed unknot, arXiv:1611.06506

    arXiv

  53. [57]

    I. G. MacDolnald, Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials , 2nd edi- tion, Charendon Press, 1995

    1995

  54. [58]

    Mariño, open string amplitudes and large order behavior in topolog- ical string theory , arXiv:hep-th/0612127

    M. Mariño, open string amplitudes and large order behavior in topolog- ical string theory , arXiv:hep-th/0612127

    arXiv

  55. [59]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, An. Morozov, On colored HOMFLY polyno- mials for twist knots , Mod. Phys. Lett. A 29 (2014) 145-183

    2014

  56. [60]

    Mironov, A

    A. Mironov, A. Morozov, An. Morozov, P. Ramadevi, V. Kum ar Singh and A. Sleptsov, Checks of integrality properties in topological strings , doi 10.1007/JHEP08(2017)139. arXiv:1702.06316. 29

    2017 arXiv

  57. [62]

    Mariño, C

    M. Mariño, C. Vafa, Framed knots at large N , in: Orbifolds Mathe- matics and Physics, Madison, WI, 2001, in: Contemp. Math., v ol.310, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2002, pp.185-204

    2001

  58. [63]

    Maulik, A

    D. Maulik, A. Oblomkov, A. Okounkov and R. Pandharipand e Gromov-Witten/Donaldson-Thomas correspondence for tori c 3-folds , Invent math (2011) 186:435-479

    2011

  59. [64]

    Nawata, P

    S. Nawata, P. Ramadevi, Zodinmawia and Xinyu Sun Super-A- polynomials for Twist Knots , JHEP 1211 (2012) 157

    2012

  60. [65]

    Okounkov, R

    A. Okounkov, R. Pandharipande, Hodge integrals and invariants of the unknot, Geom. Topol. 8, 675-699 (2004)

    2004

  61. [66]

    Ooguri, C

    H. Ooguri, C. Vafa, Knot invariants and topological strings . Nucl. Phys. B 577(3), 419-438 (2000)

    2000

  62. [67]

    Peng, A Simple Proof of Gopakumar-Vafa Conjecture for Local Toric Calabi-Yau Manifolds, Commun

    P. Peng, A Simple Proof of Gopakumar-Vafa Conjecture for Local Toric Calabi-Yau Manifolds, Commun. Math. Phys. 276 (2007), 551-569

    2007

  63. [68]

    Pandharipande, J

    R. Pandharipande, J. Solomon and J. Walcher, Disk enumeration on the quintic 3-fold , J. Amer. Math. Soc. Vol 21, Number 4, (2008), 1169-1209

    2008

  64. [70]

    Panfil, M

    M. Panfil, M. Stosic and P. Sulkowski, Donaldson-Thomas invari- ants, torus knots, and lattice paths , Phys. Rev. D 98, 026022 (2018). arXiv:1802.04573

    2018 arXiv

  65. [71]

    Reineke, Degenerate Cohomological Hall algebra and quantized Donaldson-Thomas invariants for m-loop quivers , Doc

    M. Reineke, Degenerate Cohomological Hall algebra and quantized Donaldson-Thomas invariants for m-loop quivers , Doc. Math. 17 (2012) 1

    2012

  66. [72]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. Turaev, Ribbon graphs and their invariants de- rived from quantum groups . Comm. Math. Phys., 127(1):1-26, 1990

    1990

  67. [73]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. Turaev, Invariants of 3-manifolds via link poly- nomials and quantum groups , Invent. Math. 103, (1991) 547-597

    1991

  68. [74]

    R. P. Stanley, Enumerative combinatorics , Vol. 2, Cambridge Stud- ies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 62 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999). 30

    1999

  69. [75]

    Taubes, Lagrangians for the Gopakumar-Vafa conjecture

    C.H. Taubes, Lagrangians for the Gopakumar-Vafa conjecture . Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 5, 139-163 (2001)

    2001

  70. [76]

    Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial , Commun

    E. Witten, Quantum field theory and the Jones polynomial , Commun. Math. Phys. 121 (1989) , 351

    1989

  71. [77]

    Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space, Surv

    E. Witten, Two-dimensional gravity and intersection theory on moduli space, Surv. Differ. Geom. 1, (1991) 243–310

    1991

  72. [78]

    Witten, Chern-Simons Gauge Theory As A String Theory , Prog

    E. Witten, Chern-Simons Gauge Theory As A String Theory , Prog. Math. 133, 637 (1995)

    1995

  73. [81]

    Zhu, Colored HOMFLY polynomials via skein theory , J

    S. Zhu, Colored HOMFLY polynomials via skein theory , J. High. En- ergy. Phys. 10(2013), 229

    2013

  74. [82]

    Zhu, Topological Strings and Their Applications in Mathematics , Notices of The ICCM, Dec

    S. Zhu, Topological Strings and Their Applications in Mathematics , Notices of The ICCM, Dec. 2017

    2017

  75. [83]

    Zhu, Topological strings, quiver varieties, and Rogers-Ramanu jan identities, Ramanujan J (2019) 48: 399

    S. Zhu, Topological strings, quiver varieties, and Rogers-Ramanu jan identities, Ramanujan J (2019) 48: 399

    2019

  76. [84]

    Zhu, Integrality structures in topological strings II , in preparation

    S. Zhu, Integrality structures in topological strings II , in preparation. 31

Pith tools

Reviewed August 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.