Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 117 references

Loop corrections to known W, Z and Higgs lepton decays already exclude heavy leptophilic Z' bosons that direct searches still allow.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-13 18:07 UTC pith:FXQJPLJX

load-bearing objection Useful new exclusion maps for heavy leptophilic Z', but the high-mass claim rests on an unquantified truncation of discontinuous loop pieces that may spoil decoupling. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2603.25589 v2 pith:FXQJPLJX submitted 2026-03-26 hep-ph hep-ex

Constraining the heavy leptophilic neutral gauge bosons through the Ztoell^+ell^-, W^pmtoell^pmν_ell, and htoell^+ell^- decays

Bibhabasu De , Amitabha Dey This is my paper
classification hep-ph hep-ex
keywords leptophilic Z'U(1)_{Li-Lj}one-loop vertex correctionsW/Z/h leptonic decaysTeV-scale exclusion limitsflavor-specific couplings
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Heavy neutral gauge bosons that couple only to specific lepton flavors remain weakly constrained once their mass sits above a few hundred GeV, because the usual collider and beam-dump bounds lose sensitivity. This paper shows that the same bosons still correct the leptonic decays of the W, Z and Higgs at one loop. Existing precision measurements of those decay widths already rule out large regions of the remaining parameter space: roughly M greater than 4.5 TeV with coupling above 0.5 for the electron-muon and electron-tau cases, and M greater than 500 GeV with coupling above 0.4 for the muon-tau case. The resulting exclusion limits are stronger than the classic LEP-2 and neutrino-trident bounds once the mass reaches the TeV scale. Future improvements in the same decay channels will therefore continue to probe leptophilic new physics even before multi-TeV lepton colliders turn on.

Core claim

When a heavy flavor-specific leptophilic Z' is exchanged in one-loop diagrams, it shifts the widths of W to lepton-neutrino, Z to dilepton and Higgs to dilepton. Using the published experimental upper limits on those shifts, the authors exclude the windows {M_eμ > 4.54 TeV, g' > 0.54}, {M_eτ > 4.54 TeV, g' > 0.44} and {M_μτ > 526 GeV, g' > 0.44}. These regions lie beyond the reach of present direct bounds and therefore constitute the strongest existing constraints on TeV-scale leptophilic Z' bosons.

What carries the argument

The renormalized one-loop vertex corrections δV^R_Wℓ, δV^R_Zℓ and δY^R_hℓ induced by Z' exchange. After ultraviolet subtraction they yield finite shifts ΔΓ to the three decay widths; any point that exceeds the experimental ceiling on ΔΓ is excluded.

Load-bearing premise

The authors drop discontinuous pieces of the loop integrands and assert that the truncation does not change the numerical results for masses above about 100 GeV; the exclusion contours rest on that uncontrolled approximation.

What would settle it

A future precision measurement (or a lattice/analytic recalculation of the same loop integrals without truncation) that either tightens or loosens the experimental upper bounds on ΔΓ_Zll or ΔΓ_hττ enough to move the claimed exclusion contours by more than the quoted coupling threshold of ~0.4.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies heavy leptophilic Z' bosons arising from anomaly-free U(1)_{Li-Lj} extensions of the SM. It derives the one-loop renormalized corrections to the Wℓν, Zℓℓ and hℓℓ vertices induced by Z' exchange (Secs. IV A–C, Eqs. (11), (15), (24)), converts them into shifts ΔΓ of the corresponding partial widths (Eqs. (14), (18), (27)), and confronts those shifts with the PDG upper limits collected in Table I. The resulting exclusion regions in the (Mij, g'ij) plane (Fig. 5) are claimed to supersede the existing LEP-2 and neutrino-trident bounds for Mij ≳ O(1) TeV and g'ij ≳ 0.4.

Significance. If the numerical exclusions survive a controlled evaluation of the loop integrals, the work supplies a model-independent, loop-level constraint on TeV-scale leptophilic Z' bosons that is complementary to future lepton-collider projections. The analytic expressions for the renormalized vertex factors are derived in detail and the comparison with external experimental bounds is transparent; free parameters are only the model inputs M and g'. These features make the result potentially useful for the leptophilic BSM literature.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. IV (paragraph after Eq. (27)): the discontinuous F1-dependent pieces of A2(x), B2(x) and D2(x) are simply dropped, with only the unquantified assertion that the truncation produces 'no significant difference' for MZ' ≥ O(100) GeV. The high-mass plateaus of Fig. 6 and the colored exclusion points of Fig. 5 rest on the retained pieces alone. Because a properly regulated integral is expected to restore decoupling ∼ R (or R ln R) while the truncated expressions leave a non-vanishing constant as R_i o 0, the claimed superseding contours {Meμ > 4.54 TeV, g'eμ > 0.54} etc. are uncontrolled. A quantitative comparison of the full (principal-value or iε-regulated) integrals versus the truncated ones, or an explicit demonstration that the dropped terms cancel the constant, is required before the exclusion claim can be accepted.
  2. Eqs. (14), (18), (27) and the surrounding text: the BSM correction is restricted to O((g')^{2}) and all SM imes BSM cross terms are neglected 'to a good approximation' without any numerical error estimate. For the g' ∼ 0.4–1 region that is being excluded this truncation is not obviously safe; at least a sample evaluation of the size of the omitted pieces (or a statement of the relative error) should be supplied.
minor comments (4)
  1. Fig. 6 caption and footnote 1: the origin of the dips at ∼150 GeV and ∼170 GeV is explained only qualitatively; a short remark on the relative signs of the Ai functions would help the reader.
  2. Table I: the experimental upper limits on ΔΓ are taken from PDG 2024; a one-line statement of how the SM prediction was subtracted (or whether the total experimental uncertainty was used) would improve reproducibility.
  3. Appendix A: the Fi functions contain logarithms of negative arguments (ln(-a)); a brief note on the iε prescription adopted for the numerical evaluation would remove ambiguity.
  4. Throughout: flavor indices are suppressed after Sec. III and then re-introduced ad hoc; a consistent notation (e.g., always keeping ij subscripts on M and g') would reduce confusion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No significant circularity: loop-derived ΔΓ values are scanned against external PDG upper limits; self-citation to prior Z-decay calculation is non-load-bearing.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Sec. IV.B, paragraph after Fig. 3; also Introduction]
    "The calculation for Z oℓ+ℓ− decay is similar to that of the W± oℓ± uℓ, and one can follow Ref. [31] to obtain the renormalized vertex correction factor as… [and earlier] the exclusion limit corresponding to one-loop corrected Z o au+ au− decay … [31]."

    Ref. [31] is by the same first author and supplies both a prior numerical claim and the algebraic template for δV^R_Zℓ. However the present paper re-writes the full expression (Eq. 15) and the central new exclusions rest on the simultaneous W/Z/h analysis for all three Z', so the self-citation is not load-bearing for the headline result.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Model Lagrangian (Eq. 1) and spontaneous-breaking masses are standard. One-loop vertex corrections δV^R_Wℓ, δV^R_Zℓ and δY^R_hℓ are obtained from Feynman diagrams (Figs. 2–4) via Feynman parametrization and dimensional regularization, yielding explicit integrals A_i, B_i, D_i (Eqs. 11, 15, 24). Truncation of the discontinuous F1 pieces is an uncontrolled approximation (correctness issue, not circularity). The resulting ΔΓ_Wℓν, ΔΓ_Zℓℓ, ΔΓ_hℓℓ (Eqs. 14, 18, 27) are then compared, for free parameters {M_ij, g'_ij}, to external experimental upper bounds taken from PDG 2024 (Table I). No parameter is fitted to any subset of the target data; the exclusion contours in Fig. 5 are therefore genuine confrontations of computed shifts with independent measurements. The single self-citation ([31], same first author) is used only to note a prior partial result for Z o au au and to shortcut the algebra for δV^R_Zℓ; the expressions are re-derived and the new exclusions (including W and h channels for all three Z') do not reduce to that citation. Hence circularity score remains minimal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 4 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper works inside a standard anomaly-free U(1)_{Li-Lj} extension. The only free parameters scanned are the Z' mass and coupling; all other inputs (SM masses, G_F, PDG width bounds) are taken from external data. The Z' itself is a postulated entity whose existence is not independently established. The truncation of loop integrands is an ad-hoc numerical assumption required for the claimed exclusions.

free parameters (2)
  • M_ij (Z' mass)
    Scanned freely over 10^{2}–10^{5} GeV; no dynamical generation or fit to data.
  • g'_ij (U(1) gauge coupling)
    Scanned freely over 0.1–1.0; the exclusion contours are drawn in this plane.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption λ_Hφ o 0 so that the extra singlet scalar does not mix with the SM Higgs and does not affect Higgs observables.
    Stated in Sec. II after Eq. (2); required to keep the hℓℓ calculation SM-like at tree level.
  • domain assumption Higher-order terms O((g')^{4}) and SM× BSM interference can be neglected inside the perturbative regime.
    Invoked after Eqs. (14), (18), (27) to truncate the width shifts to Re(δV).
  • ad hoc to paper The discontinuous pieces of A2(x), B2(x), D2(x) may be dropped without affecting the numerical exclusions for M_Z' ≥ O(100) GeV.
    Explicitly introduced at the end of Sec. IV; no error estimate supplied.
  • domain assumption Dimensional regularization scale Λ is set equal to M_Z'.
    Stated after Eq. (7); standard but still a choice that enters the finite parts.
invented entities (1)
  • Flavor-specific leptophilic Z'_ij (i,j = e,μ,τ) no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediator of the new U(1)_{Li-Lj} force whose loop effects generate the width shifts used for exclusion.
    Standard BSM particle; independent evidence would be direct production or other observables, none of which are claimed here.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 26854 in / 2884 out tokens · 41706 ms · 2026-07-13T18:07:46.037908+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider the hypothetical possibility of neutral gauge bosons ($Z^\prime$) with flavor-specific leptophilic couplings. For such New Physics (NP) interactions, the current experimental constraints are much relaxed in the heavy mass regime, particularly for masses $\geq \mathcal{O}(1)$ TeV. However, in the presence of a leptophilic $Z^\prime$, leptonic decay modes of the electroweak gauge bosons and Higgs can be corrected at the loop level. Using the existing upper bounds on the corresponding decay widths, we find that one can impose stronger exclusion limits on the interactions of a heavy $Z^\prime$. Future updates on the aforesaid decay channels can be used in complementarity with the proposed lepton colliders to probe even weaker leptophilic NP interactions at the TeV scale and beyond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2603.25589 by Amitabha Dey, Bibhabasu De.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Current experimental bounds (gray-shaded regions) and projected sensitivities (colored lines) in the heavy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) shows the one-loop BSM correction diagram corresponding to W ¯ℓνℓ vertex in the pres￾ence of Z ′ , whereas Figs. 2 (b) and 2 (c) are the associated leg correction diagrams. The contribution W ℓ νℓ k p1 − k p1 p2 q Z ′ ℓ p2 − k νℓ (a) W νℓ ℓ Z ′ p1 p2 q k (b) W νℓ p1 ℓ p2 q Z ′ k (c) FIG. 2. One-loop correction to (a) W ¯ℓνℓ vertex and (b), (c) the corresponding leg correction diagrams in the presence o… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: represents the one-loop correction to the Z ¯ℓℓ vertex and the corresponding leg correction diagrams in the considered GSM ⊗U(1)Li−Lj framework. Z ℓ ℓ k p1 − k p1 p2 q Z ′ ℓ p2 − k (a) Z ℓ ℓ Z ′ p1 p2 q k (b) Z ℓ p1 ℓ p2 q Z ′ k (c) FIG. 3. One-loop correction to (a) Z ¯ℓℓ vertex and (b), (c) the corresponding leg correction diagrams in the presence of Z ′ . The calculation for Z → ℓ +ℓ − decay is similar … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. One-loop diagrams resulting in corrections to the (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Exclusion limits on (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Variation of (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 93 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Aad et al.,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al.,Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 1–29, [1207.7214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    Chatrchyan et al.,Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,Phys

    CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al.,Observation of a New Boson at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC,Phys. Lett. B716(2012) 30–61, [1207.7235]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  3. [3]

    Aad et al.,Measurement of the W-boson mass and width with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV,2403.15085

    ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al.,Measurement of the W-boson mass and width with the ATLAS detector using proton-proton collisions at √s = 7 TeV,2403.15085

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  4. [4]

    Chekhovsky et al.,High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC,2412.13872

    CMS collaboration, V . Chekhovsky et al.,High-precision measurement of the W boson mass with the CMS experiment at the LHC,2412.13872

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  5. [5]

    Aaij et al.,Measurement of the Z-Boson Mass,Phys

    LHCBcollaboration, R. Aaij et al.,Measurement of the Z-Boson Mass,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 161802, [2505.15582]

    arXiv 2025

  6. [6]

    Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, 2505.21476

    R. Aliberti et al.,The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, 2505.21476

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    J. H. Oort,The force exerted by the stellar system in the direction perpendicular to the galactic plane and some related problems,Bulletin of the Astronomical Institutes of the Netherlands6(Aug., 1932) 249

    1932

  8. [8]

    Zwicky,On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae,Astrophys

    F. Zwicky,On the Masses of Nebulae and of Clusters of Nebulae,Astrophys. J.86(1937) 217–246

    1937

  9. [9]

    R. B. Metcalf, L. A. Moustakas, A. J. Bunker and I. R. Parry,Spectroscopic gravitational lensing and limits on the dark matter substructure in Q2237+0305,Astrophys. J.607(2004) 43–59, [astro-ph/0309738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results

    PLANCKcollaboration, N. Aghanim et al.,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A6, [1807.06209]. [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Fukuda et al.,Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys

    SUPER-KAMIOKANDEcollaboration, Y . Fukuda et al.,Evidence for oscillation of atmospheric neutrinos, Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 1562–1567, [hep-ex/9807003]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  12. [12]

    Su and B

    S. Su and B. Thomas,The LHC Discovery Potential of a Leptophilic Higgs,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 095014, [0903.0667]. 18

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  13. [13]

    Schmidt, T

    D. Schmidt, T. Schwetz and T. Toma,Direct Detection of Leptophilic Dark Matter in a Model with Radiative Neutrino Masses,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 073009, [1201.0906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  14. [14]

    del Aguila, M

    F. del Aguila, M. Chala, J. Santiago and Y . Yamamoto,Collider limits on leptophilic interactions,JHEP03 (2015) 059, [1411.7394]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    D’Eramo, B

    F. D’Eramo, B. J. Kavanagh and P. Panci,Probing Leptophilic Dark Sectors with Hadronic Processes,Phys. Lett. B771(2017) 339–348, [1702.00016]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    de Gouv ˆea, P

    A. de Gouv ˆea, P. S. B. Dev, B. Dutta, T. Ghosh, T. Han and Y . Zhang,Leptonic Scalars at the LHC,JHEP07 (2020) 142, [1910.01132]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    Foot,New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,Mod

    R. Foot,New Physics From Electric Charge Quantization?,Mod. Phys. Lett. A6(1991) 527–530

    1991

  18. [18]

    X.-G. He, G. C. Joshi, H. Lew and R. R. V olkas,Simplest Z-prime model,Phys. Rev. D44(1991) 2118–2132

    1991

  19. [19]

    R. Foot, X. G. He, H. Lew and R. R. V olkas,Model for a light Z-prime boson,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 4571–4580, [hep-ph/9401250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  20. [20]

    R. N. Mohapatra and R. E. Marshak,PHENOMENOLOGY OF NEUTRON OSCILLATIONS,Phys. Lett. B94 (1980) 183. [Erratum: Phys.Lett.B 96, 444–444 (1980)]

    1980

  21. [21]

    F. S. Queiroz, J. Zamora-Saa, R. C. Silva and Y . M. Oviedo-Torres,LHC and HL-LHC bounds on visible and invisible Z’ decays in the B-L model,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 095021, [2501.00610]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    P. J. Fox and E. Poppitz,Leptophilic Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 083528, [0811.0399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  23. [23]

    J. Kopp, V . Niro, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan,DAMA/LIBRA and leptonically interacting Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 083502, [0907.3159]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  24. [24]

    Essig, J

    R. Essig, J. Mardon and T. V olansky,Direct Detection of Sub-GeV Dark Matter,Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 076007, [1108.5383]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Agrawal, Z

    P. Agrawal, Z. Chacko and C. B. Verhaaren,Leptophilic Dark Matter and the Anomalous Magnetic Moment of the Muon,JHEP08(2014) 147, [1402.7369]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  26. [26]

    N. F. Bell, Y . Cai, R. K. Leane and A. D. Medina,Leptophilic dark matter with Z ′ interactions,Phys. Rev. D90 (2014) 035027, [1407.3001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Alves, A

    A. Alves, A. Berlin, S. Profumo and F. S. Queiroz,Dark Matter Complementarity and the Z ′ Portal,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 083004, [1501.03490]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  28. [28]

    Biswas, S

    A. Biswas, S. Choubey and S. Khan,Neutrino Mass, Dark Matter and Anomalous Magnetic Moment of Muon in a U(1)Lµ −Lτ Model,JHEP09(2016) 147, [1608.04194]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  29. [29]

    Foldenauer,Light dark matter in a gauged U(1) Lµ −Lτ model,Phys

    P. Foldenauer,Light dark matter in a gauged U(1) Lµ −Lτ model,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 035007, [1808.03647]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  30. [30]

    Blanco, M

    C. Blanco, M. Escudero, D. Hooper and S. J. Witte,Z ′ mediated WIMPs: dead, dying, or soon to be detected?, JCAP11(2019) 024, [1907.05893]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  31. [31]

    B. De,Exploring the null results in the direct detection experiments,(g−2) ℓ and neutrino mass in an extended U(1) Lµ −Lτ model constrained through the Z→ℓ +ℓ− decays,JHEP12(2025) 075, [2509.10939]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Wang, Z.-L

    Z.-W. Wang, Z.-L. Han, F. Huang, Y . Jin and H. Li,Prospects of Z′ portal dark matter in U(1)Lµ −Lτ ,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 095017, [2501.08622]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    J. P. Leveille,The Second Order Weak Correction to (G-2) of the Muon in Arbitrary Gauge Models,Nucl. Phys. B137(1978) 63–76

    1978

  34. [34]

    S. N. Gninenko and N. V . Krasnikov,The Muon anomalous magnetic moment and a new light gauge boson, Phys. Lett. B513(2001) 119, [hep-ph/0102222]. 19

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  35. [35]

    S. Baek, N. G. Deshpande, X. G. He and P. Ko,Muon anomalous g-2 and gauged L(muon) - L(tau) models, Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 055006, [hep-ph/0104141]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  36. [36]

    E. Ma, D. P. Roy and S. Roy,Gauged L(mu) - L(tau) with large muon anomalous magnetic moment and the bimaximal mixing of neutrinos,Phys. Lett. B525(2002) 101–106, [hep-ph/0110146]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Majumdar, S

    C. Majumdar, S. Patra, P. Pritimita, S. Senapati and U. A. Yajnik,Neutrino mass, mixing and muon g−2 explanation inU(1) Lµ −Lτ extension of left-right theory,JHEP09(2020) 010, [2004.14259]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    De,The revival of U(1) Le−Lµ : a natural solution for(g−2) µ with a sub-GeV dark matter,Eur

    B. De,The revival of U(1) Le−Lµ : a natural solution for(g−2) µ with a sub-GeV dark matter,Eur. Phys. J. C 85(2025) 81, [2410.04399]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Ota and W

    T. Ota and W. Rodejohann,Breaking of L(mu) - L(tau) Flavor Symmetry, Lepton Flavor Violation and Leptogenesis,Phys. Lett. B639(2006) 322–331, [hep-ph/0605231]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  40. [40]

    A. J. Buras, A. Crivellin, F. Kirk, C. A. Manzari and M. Montull,Global analysis of leptophilic Z’ bosons, JHEP06(2021) 068, [2104.07680]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Ardu and F

    M. Ardu and F. Kirk,A viable L e −L µ model withµ→e violation,Eur. Phys. J. C83(2023) 394, [2205.02254]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Hayrapetyan et al.,Search for charged lepton flavor violating Z and Z ′ boson decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,Phys

    CMS collaboration, A. Hayrapetyan et al.,Search for charged lepton flavor violating Z and Z ′ boson decays in proton-proton collisions at s=13 TeV,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 112011, [2508.07512]

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Binetruy, S

    P. Binetruy, S. Lavignac, S. T. Petcov and P. Ramond,Quasidegenerate neutrinos from an Abelian family symmetry,Nucl. Phys. B496(1997) 3–23, [hep-ph/9610481]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  44. [44]

    N. F. Bell and R. R. V olkas,Bottom up model for maximal muon-neutrino - tau-neutrino mixing,Phys. Rev. D 63(2001) 013006, [hep-ph/0008177]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  45. [45]

    C. S. Lam,A 2-3 symmetry in neutrino oscillations,Phys. Lett. B507(2001) 214–218, [hep-ph/0104116]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  46. [46]

    Choubey and W

    S. Choubey and W. Rodejohann,A Flavor symmetry for quasi-degenerate neutrinos: L(mu) - L(tau),Eur. Phys. J. C40(2005) 259–268, [hep-ph/0411190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    K. Asai, K. Hamaguchi and N. Nagata,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal gauged U(1)Lµ −Lτ model,Eur. Phys. J. C77(2017) 763, [1705.00419]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  48. [48]

    Asai,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal model extended by linear combination of U(1)Le−Lµ , U(1)Lµ −Lτ and U(1)B−L gauge symmetries,Eur

    K. Asai,Predictions for the neutrino parameters in the minimal model extended by linear combination of U(1)Le−Lµ , U(1)Lµ −Lτ and U(1)B−L gauge symmetries,Eur. Phys. J. C80(2020) 76, [1907.04042]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Dasgupta, P

    A. Dasgupta, P. S. B. Dev, T. Han, R. Padhan, S. Wang and K. Xie,Searching for heavy leptophilic Z ′: from lepton colliders to gravitational waves,JHEP12(2023) 011, [2308.12804]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    K. Deka, T. Mandal, A. Mukherjee and S. Sadhukhan,Leptogenesis in an anomaly-free U(1) extension with higher-dimensional operators,Nucl. Phys. B991(2023) 116213, [2105.15088]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  51. [51]

    Borah, A

    D. Borah, A. Dasgupta and D. Mahanta,TeV scale resonant leptogenesis with L µ −L τ gauge symmetry in light of the muon g-2,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 075006, [2106.14410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Bauer, P

    M. Bauer, P. Foldenauer and J. Jaeckel,Hunting All the Hidden Photons,JHEP07(2018) 094, [1803.05466]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    E. M. Riordan et al.,A Search for Short Lived Axions in an Electron Beam Dump Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett. 59(1987) 755

    1987

  54. [54]

    J. D. Bjorken, S. Ecklund, W. R. Nelson, A. Abashian, C. Church, B. Lu et al.,Search for Neutral Metastable Penetrating Particles Produced in the SLAC Beam Dump,Phys. Rev. D38(1988) 3375

    1988

  55. [55]

    Bross, M

    A. Bross, M. Crisler, S. H. Pordes, J. V olk, S. Errede and J. Wrbanek,A Search for Shortlived Particles Produced in an Electron Beam Dump,Phys. Rev. Lett.67(1991) 2942–2945. 20

    1991

  56. [56]

    Davier and H

    M. Davier and H. Nguyen Ngoc,An Unambiguous Search for a Light Higgs Boson,Phys. Lett. B229(1989) 150–155

    1989

  57. [57]

    LSND collaboration, L. B. Auerbach et al.,Measurement of electron - neutrino - electron elastic scattering, Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 112001, [hep-ex/0101039]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  58. [58]

    Blumlein and J

    J. Blumlein and J. Brunner,New Exclusion Limits for Dark Gauge Forces from Beam-Dump Data,Phys. Lett. B701(2011) 155–159, [1104.2747]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Bl ¨umlein and J

    J. Bl ¨umlein and J. Brunner,New Exclusion Limits on Dark Gauge Forces from Proton Bremsstrahlung in Beam-Dump Data,Phys. Lett. B731(2014) 320–326, [1311.3870]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  60. [60]

    Meijer Drees et al.,Search for weakly interacting neutral bosons produced in π − p interactions at rest and decaying into e+e− pairs.,Phys

    SINDRUM I collaboration, R. Meijer Drees et al.,Search for weakly interacting neutral bosons produced in π − p interactions at rest and decaying into e+e− pairs.,Phys. Rev. Lett.68(1992) 3845–3848

    1992

  61. [61]

    J. D. Bjorken, R. Essig, P. Schuster and N. Toro,New Fixed-Target Experiments to Search for Dark Gauge Forces,Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 075018, [0906.0580]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Abrahamyan et al.,Search for a New Gauge Boson in Electron-Nucleus Fixed-Target Scattering by the APEX Experiment,Phys

    APEX collaboration, S. Abrahamyan et al.,Search for a New Gauge Boson in Electron-Nucleus Fixed-Target Scattering by the APEX Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.107(2011) 191804, [1108.2750]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  63. [63]

    Merkel et al.,Search for Light Gauge Bosons of the Dark Sector at the Mainz Microtron, Phys

    A1 collaboration, H. Merkel et al.,Search for Light Gauge Bosons of the Dark Sector at the Mainz Microtron, Phys. Rev. Lett.106(2011) 251802, [1101.4091]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  64. [64]

    Merkel et al.,Search at the Mainz Microtron for Light Massive Gauge Bosons Relevant for the Muon g-2 Anomaly,Phys

    H. Merkel et al.,Search at the Mainz Microtron for Light Massive Gauge Bosons Relevant for the Muon g-2 Anomaly,Phys. Rev. Lett.112(2014) 221802, [1404.5502]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Battaglieri et al.,The Heavy Photon Search Test Detector,Nucl

    M. Battaglieri et al.,The Heavy Photon Search Test Detector,Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A777(2015) 91–101, [1406.6115]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  66. [66]

    NA48/2 collaboration, J. R. Batley et al.,Search for the dark photon inπ 0 decays,Phys. Lett. B746(2015) 178–185, [1504.00607]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  67. [67]

    NA64 collaboration, Y . M. Andreev et al.,First Results in the Search for Dark Sectors at NA64 with the CERN SPS High Energy Muon Beam,Phys. Rev. Lett.132(2024) 211803, [2401.01708]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  68. [68]

    Buskulic et al.,Study of the four fermion final state at the Z resonance,Z

    ALEPH collaboration, D. Buskulic et al.,Study of the four fermion final state at the Z resonance,Z. Phys. C 66(1995) 3–18

    1995

  69. [69]

    LEP, ALEPH, DELPHI, L3, OPAL, LEP ELECTROWEAKWORKINGGROUP, SLD ELECTROWEAK GROUP, SLD HEAVYFLAVORGROUPcollaboration, t. S. Electroweak,A Combination of preliminary electroweak measurements and constraints on the standard model,hep-ex/0312023

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    M. R. Buckley, D. Hooper, J. Kopp and E. Neil,Light Z ′ Bosons at the Tevatron,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 115013, [1103.6035]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  71. [71]

    Anastasi et al.,Limit on the production of a new vector boson ine +e− →Uγ, U→π +π − with the KLOE experiment,Phys

    KLOE-2 collaboration, A. Anastasi et al.,Limit on the production of a new vector boson ine +e− →Uγ, U→π +π − with the KLOE experiment,Phys. Lett. B757(2016) 356–361, [1603.06086]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [72]

    BABARcollaboration, J. P. Lees et al.,Search for a muonic dark force at BABAR,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 011102, [1606.03501]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  73. [73]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Measurements of thepp→ZZproduction cross section and the Z→4ℓbranching fraction, and constraints on anomalous triple gauge couplings at √s=13TeV,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 165, [1709.08601]. [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 78, 515 (2018)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  74. [74]

    CMS collaboration, A. M. Sirunyan et al.,Search for an L µ −L τ gauge boson using Z→4µevents in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV,Phys. Lett. B792(2019) 345–368, [1808.03684]. 21

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  75. [75]

    Aaij et al.,Search for A ′ →µ +µ − Decays,Phys

    LHCBcollaboration, R. Aaij et al.,Search for A ′ →µ +µ − Decays,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 041801, [1910.06926]

    arXiv 2020

  76. [76]

    Czank et al.,Search for Z ′ →µ +µ − in the Lµ −L τ gauge-symmetric model at Belle, Phys

    BELLEcollaboration, T. Czank et al.,Search for Z ′ →µ +µ − in the Lµ −L τ gauge-symmetric model at Belle, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 012003, [2109.08596]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  77. [77]

    Adachi et al.,Search for an Invisible Z ′ in a Final State with Two Muons and Missing Energy at Belle II,Phys

    BELLE-II collaboration, I. Adachi et al.,Search for an Invisible Z ′ in a Final State with Two Muons and Missing Energy at Belle II,Phys. Rev. Lett.130(2023) 231801, [2212.03066]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  78. [78]

    Adachi et al.,Search for aτ +τ − resonance in e+e− →µ +µ −τ +τ − events with the Belle II experiment,Phys

    BELLE-II collaboration, I. Adachi et al.,Search for aτ +τ − resonance in e+e− →µ +µ −τ +τ − events with the Belle II experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023) 121802, [2306.12294]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  79. [79]

    Geiregat et al.,First observation of neutrino trident production,Phys

    CHARM-II collaboration, D. Geiregat et al.,First observation of neutrino trident production,Phys. Lett. B 245(1990) 271–275

    1990

  80. [80]

    CCFR collaboration, S. R. Mishra et al.,Neutrino Tridents and W Z Interference,Phys. Rev. Lett.66(1991) 3117–3120

    1991

Showing first 80 references.