Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 50 references

The Runkel-Watts string has exact all-genus amplitudes: a stable-graph sum with SU(2) Yang-Mills factors at each vertex, reproduced by topological recursion from a spectral curve.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-01 12:39 UTC pith:G65HJKIT

load-bearing objection New exactly solvable 2d string family with an elegant all-genus Feynman-rule formula and honest low-order checks; the matrix-integral duality is plausible but the key reconstruction step is skipped. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2607.19462 v1 pith:G65HJKIT submitted 2026-07-21 hep-th math-phmath.MP

The Runkel-Watts string

classification hep-th math-phmath.MP
keywords Runkel-Watts stringcomplex Liouville stringminimal string theorytopological recursionspectral curveSU(2) Yang-Mills TQFTVirasoro minimal stringmatrix integral duality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a new family of two-dimensional string theories, the Runkel-Watts string, obtained by tensoring Liouville CFT with the generalized Runkel-Watts CFT and the bc-ghost system, and claims to solve them completely. Its central result is an all-genus formula for the string amplitudes: each amplitude is a finite sum over stable graphs, with a two-dimensional SU(2) Yang-Mills TQFT factor and a Virasoro-minimal-string quantum volume at each vertex, and a regularized momentum integral on each edge. The same amplitudes are claimed to be generated by topological recursion from an explicit non-algebraic spectral curve, giving a duality with a matrix integral. If the formula is correct, this family becomes a solvable laboratory bridging the complex Liouville string, the A-series minimal string, and the Virasoro minimal string, with amplitudes that are piecewise polynomial, pole-free, and satisfy a derivative-form dilaton equation.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the Runkel-Watts string amplitudes RW_{g,n}(p) are given exactly by the stable-graph Feynman rules (2.48): summing over stable graphs with automorphism factors, each internal edge carries a regularized integral over a momentum k_e, and each vertex contributes the product of an SU(2) Yang-Mills TQFT partition function A^{TQFT}_{g_v,n_v}(sqrt(qq') p_v + (q+q')/2) with an analytically continued VMS quantum volume V^{sqrt(q'/q)}_{g_v,n_v}(ip_v). The paper derives this by taking a regulated rational limit b -> sqrt(q'/q) of the complex Liouville string amplitudes, in which only vertex colors divisible by q survive and the infinite color sums become Bernoulli poly

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the regulated rational limit of the CLS intersection-theoretic stable-graph formula. Taking b to the rational value sqrt(q'/q) from the upper half-plane with an epsilon-scaled amplitude selects graphs whose vertex colors are multiples of q; after resumming colors via Bernoulli Fourier series, the formula becomes momentum-space Feynman rules in which the moduli-space content is packaged entirely into the VMS quantum volumes. The vertex factor is identified with SU(2) Yang-Mills theory through the character sum (2.45): A^{TQFT} equals a sum over SU(2) representations weighted by m^{-(2g-2+n)}, the same object that computes volumes of flat SU(2) moduli spaces. The

Load-bearing premise

The all-genus formula rests on interchanging the rational limit epsilon -> 0 with infinite color sums, edge expansions, and moduli-space integrals in the complex-Liouville-string Feynman rules, and on the topological-recursion reconstruction of the Runkel-Watts spectral curve; the paper verifies the interchange only at low orders numerically and explicitly leaves the reconstruction underived.

What would settle it

Compute a higher-order Runkel-Watts amplitude directly from the worldsheet CFT, for example RW_{0,5} or RW_{1,2}, in the small-momentum regime where no contour deformation is needed, and compare with the prediction of (2.48). Any disagreement beyond numerical precision, or any dependence of the epsilon -> 0 result on the order of summation over colors versus edges, would falsify the central claim. A cheaper probe is to test the dilaton equation (2.94) at the next order (g,n) = (1,2), where only the contact graph contributes in the check.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the central formula holds, the Runkel-Watts string is exactly solvable at all genera: every amplitude RW_{g,n} is obtained from (2.48) by finitely many algebraic operations.
  • The same amplitudes are generated by topological recursion on the explicit spectral curve (2.73), so the theory is dual to a matrix integral whose eigenvalue density is the Chebyshev expression (2.77).
  • In the large-(q,q') limit the amplitudes factorize into an SU(2) Yang-Mills factor times a VMS quantum volume; the VMS volume is the envelope of a rapidly oscillating amplitude, giving a coarse-grained realization of timelike Liouville theory.
  • The Runkel-Watts string is a limit of the A-series minimal string, so the explicit Runkel-Watts amplitudes provide a solved corner of A-series minimal string theory and constraints on its general intersection-theoretic formula.
  • The amplitudes are piecewise polynomial with discontinuities but no poles, and satisfy a dilaton equation in which the dilaton insertion must be differentiated before evaluation, directly inherited from topological recursion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same limiting mechanism that turns the CLS stable-graph formula into SU(2) gauge times gravity Feynman rules would likely work for any rational degeneration of one Liouville factor; the resulting family would be labeled by the TQFT that replaces SU(2), making the gauge factor a universal fingerprint of the limit.
  • Editorial extension: at q=q'=1 the identification of momenta with SU(2) conjugacy classes and the flat-bundle volume interpretation suggests that the amplitudes could eventually be read as S-matrix-like asymptotic observables in a Lorentzian target space bounded by Runkel-Watts walls, a step the paper does not itself take.
  • Editorial extension: the derivative in the dilaton equation (2.94) indicates that naive insertion at the dilaton momentum vanishes in this theory; testing whether this non-commutation persists at higher genus would sharpen the dictionary between the worldsheet limit and the matrix-model resolvents.
  • Editorial extension: if the all-genus formula survives, the Runkel-Watts string would be the simplest example where a two-dimensional gauge theory, rather than a q-deformed gauge theory, is coupled to gravity through universal VMS vertices, suggesting a direct route from rational CFT limits to solvable gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a new family of two-dimensional string theories, the 'Runkel-Watts string', obtained by coupling Liouville CFT to the Runkel-Watts CFT. The central computational claim is an all-genus formula, Eq. (1.2)/(2.48), expressing string amplitudes as a sum over stable graphs with SU(2) Yang-Mills TQFT factors and Virasoro minimal string quantum volumes at the vertices. This formula is derived by taking a rational limit (2.31) of the complex Liouville string (CLS) intersection-theoretic Feynman rules (2.28). The paper also claims a dual description via topological recursion from a non-algebraic spectral curve (1.3)/(2.73), with a dictionary (2.87) between resolvents and Runkel-Watts amplitudes. Low-order results RW_{1,1} and RW_{0,4} are checked against direct numerical evaluation of the worldsheet CFT correlators, and several structural properties are established, including piecewise polynomiality, a triality symmetry, and a dilaton equation. In Section 3, the paper relates the Runkel-Watts string to the A-series minimal string and exhibits a coarse-grained factorization limit into a gauge theory factor times a VMS volume.

Significance. If the all-genus formula (2.48) is correct, this paper provides a genuinely new solvable string theory that sits between the complex Liouville string, the minimal strings, and the Virasoro minimal string, and whose amplitudes have elegant Feynman rules with SU(2) Yang-Mills data. The explicit low-order checks against numerical worldsheet CFT integration are a clear strength: they independently validate the limit (2.31) at the first nontrivial cases. The paper also correctly emphasizes that the VMS quantum volumes appear as universal building blocks, reinforcing the emerging structural picture in the field. However, the central claims rest on two load-bearing assumptions that are not fully proven: the interchange of the rational limit with the infinite sums/integrals in (2.28), and the identification of the resulting amplitudes with topological recursion from the spectral curve. The latter is explicitly left unproven ('We will therefore not repeat the reconstruction in detail'). These gaps do not invalidate the paper's evident plausibility, but they mean the all-genus and matrix-integral duality claims are not yet established at the level of proof.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.31)] The limit defining RW_{g,n} is taken on the CLS formula (2.28), which contains an infinite sum over stable graphs, an infinite sum over vertex colors, and an infinite edge expansion in d. Only the vertex factor is evaluated in the limit (2.32); the paper does not justify interchanging ε→0 with the graph sum, color sum, d-sum, and moduli-space integrals. The low-order checks in Sec. 2.3 cover only (g,n)=(1,1) and (0,4), which do not probe graphs with higher loop number or edge factors beyond the lowest d. Since the CLS formula is itself regularized and has pole-crossing subtleties, non-uniform convergence at rational b would alter (2.33) and hence (2.48). Please provide a justification of the interchange or add independent all-genus checks, such as RW_{2,0} or RW_{1,2}, evaluated directly from (2.33) and from the worldsheet CFT.
  2. [Sec. 2.5, Eq. (2.82)] The claimed matrix-integral duality rests on identifying (2.33) with topological recursion from the spectral curve (1.3)/(2.73). The paper explicitly declines to perform the reconstruction ('We will therefore not repeat the reconstruction in detail'). The checks (2.83)-(2.91) cover only ω_{0,3}, ω_{1,1}, and ω_{0,4}; these are the lowest orders and do not exercise the infinite branch-point sum (2.82) at orders where the non-algebraic branch points (2.74) or nodal singularities (2.76) could contribute. The dilaton equation (2.94) inherits the same gap. Consequently the duality is a conjecture supported by evidence, not a derived theorem. Please either present the reconstruction argument, even in summary, or verify the recursion at the next order (e.g., ω_{2,0} or ω_{1,2}) against an independent calculation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. 2.2, Eq. (2.39)] The representation of the edge factor as a sum over ℓ_e with analytic continuation in s is delicate because the sum is not absolutely convergent at s=-1. The paper states an equivalence to the regularization in [14]; a few more details of why the ℓ-sum and the ψ-class expansion commute would improve readability.
  2. [Appendix A, after Eq. (A.3)] The chamber identity is reduced to 'finitely many cases' but the cases are not enumerated. The proof sketch would be easier to check if the list of cases (i)-(iii) were explicitly verified or tabulated.
  3. [Sec. 2.5, after Eq. (2.88)] The inverse dictionary (2.88) is stated with a sign prescription; a brief comment on how the ±-signs are correlated in practice would prevent ambiguity, especially for non-symmetric integrands.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.14)] The limit from the A-series minimal string torus amplitude is verified only after 'fixing the overall normalization appropriately'; since this is a check of the relation, the normalization ambiguity should be spelled out more explicitly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the RW amplitudes are defined independently and derived as a limit of the prior CLS formula, with direct numerical checks and no fit-to-output step.

full rationale

The paper's central object RW_{g,n} is first defined directly from the worldsheet path integral in (2.17), independently of the final all-genus formula. The all-genus expression (2.48) is then obtained by taking the rational limit of the CLS stable-graph formula (2.28), leading to (2.33) and its momentum-space rewriting. No parameter in (2.48) is fitted to the amplitudes it purports to derive; the only inputs are the prior CLS intersection-theoretic Feynman rules and the definitions of the constituent CFTs. The low-order results RW_{1,1} and RW_{0,4} are checked against direct numerical integration of the worldsheet correlators (Figs. 4 and 5), providing an independent benchmark outside the fitted input. The topological-recursion duality is constructed by comparing (2.33) with the universal stable-graph expansion, so the spectral curve is read off from the same formula rather than fitted to the recursive output; the subsequent recovery of RW_{0,3}, RW_{1,1}, and RW_{0,4} from the recursion is a consistency check, not an independent prediction. The most substantial gap is the explicitly omitted reconstruction in §2.5: “We will therefore not repeat the reconstruction in detail,” after citing [33, Thm. 4.1] and [14, App. B]. This is an omitted proof and a correctness/fragility concern, but not a circular step, because the claimed identification is with an external theorem and a prior derivation. The paper relies heavily on self-cited prior work for the CLS formula, but that formula is parameter-free, has its own worldsheet and numerical checks, and does not assume the RW result; reliance on prior results is not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 4 axioms · 0 invented entities

No parameter is fitted to data; vertex normalizations are fixed by convention rather than by fitting. The paper introduces no new particles or forces; the Runkel-Watts string is a new composite of existing CFT data.

free parameters (1)
  • (q, q') family labels = integer pair, e.g. (4,3), (5,3) in checks
    Discrete labels of the Runkel-Watts CFT and string; chosen to define the theory, not fitted to data, but all amplitudes depend on them.
axioms (4)
  • domain assumption The CLS all-genus intersection-number formula (2.28) is exact for all (g,n) and admits the rational limit used here.
    RW amplitudes are defined via this limit (§2.2). The formula is quoted from [14] and is not proven in this paper; the authors only cite consistency checks.
  • domain assumption Runkel-Watts CFT correlation functions on all genera are defined by the data (2.7)-(2.9) and satisfy the bootstrap/sewing.
    Used in the worldsheet definition (2.17). Crossing is cited to [30], not re-derived here.
  • standard math Topological recursion with the RW spectral curve (1.3) reproduces the stable-graph expansion via the intersection-theoretic theorem of Eynard [33] and the Givental identification [34].
    Used to claim the matrix-integral duality (§2.5).
  • domain assumption VMS quantum volumes (2.40) admit analytic continuation to imaginary momenta with polynomial behavior.
    Needed for the vertex factors in (1.2). Standard in [10] but not proven in this paper.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 31289 in / 14605 out tokens · 139076 ms · 2026-08-01T12:39:39.752447+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We introduce and solve a new family of two-dimensional string theories obtained by coupling Liouville CFT to the generalized Runkel-Watts CFT. By taking an appropriate limit of the complex Liouville string, we derive an all-genus formula for its string amplitudes, and formulate a duality with a matrix integral. We explain that it can be interpreted as 2d SU(2) Yang-Mills theory coupled to gravity. We show that it also directly relates to other minimal string constructions such as the A-series minimal string.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.19462 by Lorenz Eberhardt, Mattia Biancotto, Victor A. Rodriguez, Zi-Yue Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic view of the relations among several 2d string theories. The Runkel-Watts string sits at an intermediate point between the complex Liouville string, the A-series minimal string, and a coarse-grained version of the Virasoro minimal string. Feynman rules for string amplitudes. Our main computational result is an all-genus expression for the Runkel-Watts string amplitudes. A striking feature of the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The colored tetrahedron shows the region in which σ(P1, P2, P3) = 1 within the fundamental cube 0 ≤ Pi ≤ 1 2 √ qq′ for i = 1, 2, 3. Left: q + q ′ even. Right: q + q ′ odd. Indeed, the poles of the inverse-DOZZ structure constant in (2.8) occur at ±Pj = m + 1 2 β + n + 1 2 β −1 , m, n ∈ Z≥0 . (2.11) After setting β = p q ′/q, these loci lie at Pj ∈ 1 2 √ qq′Z, and are therefore killed by the σ factor. Conse… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The unshaded area represents the region in the external Liouville momenta where the moduli space integral that defines the CLS sphere four-point amplitude con￾verges. The shaded regions correspond to 90-degree wedges of divergence emanating from the branch points of the amplitude. In the limit that b → p q ′/q, the region of convergence pinches off into q ′ + q rhombi of convergence, lying within the range… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The torus one-point Runkel-Watts amplitude RW1,1(p1) as a function of p1. The light blue dots are obtained from direct numerical integration, while the lavender curve is the analytic formula (2.56). The two agree within numerical precision. Top: Runkel-Watts string labeled by (4, 3). Bottom: Runkel-Watts string labeled by (5, 3). Piecewise polynomiality. The amplitudes are all piecewise polynomial. This fo… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The sphere four-point Runkel-Watts amplitude RW0,4(p1, p2, p3, p4) as a function of p2. The light blue dots are obtained from direct numerical integration, while the lavender curve is the analytic formula (2.62). The two agree within numerical precision. Top: Runkel-Watts string labeled by (4, 3), with p1 = 0.22, p3 = 0.28, and p4 = 0.12. Bottom: Runkel-Watts string labeled by (5, 3), with p1 = 0.21, p3 = … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spectral curve of the (5, 3) Runkel-Watts string, projected onto the (Re x, Re y)-plane. The portion displayed here corresponds to z ∈ (0, 1500). As one includes the remaining values of z, the curve continues to oscillate between the same endpoints on the Re x-axis, with progressively larger amplitude in the Re y direction. Density of states. In the context of random matrix models, we can interpret the… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The density of states ρ0(E) of the (5, 3) Runkel-Watts string. i0 prescription amounts to an overall sign (−1)q+q ′ . Here Un(z) denotes the n-th Chebyshev polynomial of the second kind, Un(cos θ) = sin((n + 1)θ)/ sin θ. The density is supported on the cut starting at E = 2. Near the edge, it behaves as ρ0(E) ∼ 4(qq′ ) 3/2 √ E − 2. At large energy, it has polynomial growth, ρ0(E) ∼ 2(qq′ ) 1/2E q+q ′−1 . S… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The Runkel-Watts amplitudes RWg,n(p) in the limit q, q′ → ∞ with p q ′/q → b0 ∈ R held fixed are rapidly oscillating functions of the momenta whose envelope is given by the VMS quantum volume ±V (b0) g,n (ip). The blue curve shows the torus one-point RW amplitude for the model labeled by (q, q′ ) = (53, 32), while the red curves show the corresponding VMS volume envelope. since only odd-dimensional represe… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The lavender curve shows the RWS sphere four-point amplitude RW0,4(p1, p2, p3, p4)/( Q4 j=1 Npj ) as a function of the external momentum p2, while the red dashed curve shows the appropriately rescaled Runkel-Watts limit of the Belavin￾Zamolodchikov formula. Here the RWS is labeled by (q, q′ ) = (5, 3), with p1 = 0.0129, p3 = 0.0387, and p4 = 0.0516, while the AMS is labeled by (q, q ′ ) = (50003, 30002). T… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 42 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Brezin and V

    E. Brezin and V. Kazakov,Exactly Solvable Field Theories of Closed Strings,Phys. Lett. B236(1990) 144

  2. [2]

    M. R. Douglas and S. H. Shenker,Strings in Less Than One-Dimension,Nucl. Phys. B335(1990) 635

  3. [3]

    D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal,Nonperturbative Two-Dimensional Quantum Gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett.64(1990) 127

  4. [4]

    Seiberg and D

    N. Seiberg and D. Shih,Minimal string theory,Comptes Rendus Physique6(2005) 165 [hep-th/0409306]

  5. [5]

    I. R. Klebanov,String theory in two-dimensions, inSpring School on String Theory and Quantum Gravity (to be followed by Workshop), 7, 1991,hep-th/9108019

  6. [6]

    P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore,Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string theory, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute (TASI 92): From Black Holes and Strings to Particles, pp. 277–469, 10, 1993,hep-th/9304011

  7. [7]

    Jevicki,Development in 2-d string theory, inWorkshop on String Theory, Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity, 9, 1993,hep-th/9309115, DOI

    A. Jevicki,Development in 2-d string theory, inWorkshop on String Theory, Gauge Theory and Quantum Gravity, 9, 1993,hep-th/9309115, DOI

  8. [8]

    J. Polchinski,What is string theory?, inNATO Advanced Study Institute: Les Houches Summer School, Session 62: Fluctuating Geometries in Statistical Mechanics and Field Theory, 11, 1994,hep-th/9411028. – 42 –

  9. [9]

    Balthazar, V

    B. Balthazar, V. A. Rodriguez and X. Yin,ZZ instantons and the non-perturbative dual of c = 1 string theory,JHEP05(2023) 048 [1907.07688]

  10. [10]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The Virasoro minimal string,SciPost Phys.16(2024) 057 [2309.10846]

  11. [11]

    P. Saad, S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

  12. [12]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,Complex Liouville String,Phys. Rev. Lett.134(2025) 251602 [2409.17246]

  13. [13]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: The worldsheet,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 033 [2409.18759]

  14. [14]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: The matrix integral,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 154 [2410.07345]

  15. [15]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt, B. M¨ uhlmann and V. A. Rodriguez,The complex Liouville string: Worldsheet boundaries and non-perturbative effects,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 034 [2410.09179]

  16. [16]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and B. M¨ uhlmann,The complex Liouville string: The gravitational path integral,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 115 [2501.10265]

  17. [17]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and B. M¨ uhlmann,A microscopic realization of dS 3,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 131 [2501.01486]

  18. [18]

    Collier, L

    S. Collier, L. Eberhardt and V. A. Rodriguez,c= 1strings as a matrix integral, 2604.06301

  19. [19]

    Runkel and G

    I. Runkel and G. M. T. Watts,A Nonrational CFT with c = 1 as a limit of minimal models,JHEP09(2001) 006 [hep-th/0107118]

  20. [20]

    Schomerus,Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory,JHEP11(2003) 043 [hep-th/0306026]

    V. Schomerus,Rolling tachyons from Liouville theory,JHEP11(2003) 043 [hep-th/0306026]

  21. [21]

    McElgin,Notes on Liouville Theory at c<= 1,Phys

    W. McElgin,Notes on Liouville Theory at c<= 1,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 066009 [0706.0365]

  22. [22]

    Sen and B

    A. Sen and B. Zwiebach,String Field Theory: A Review,2405.19421

  23. [23]

    Eynard and N

    B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Invariants of algebraic curves and topological expansion, Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.1(2007) 347 [math-ph/0702045]

  24. [24]

    Chekhov, B

    L. Chekhov, B. Eynard and N. Orantin,Free energy topological expansion for the 2-matrix model,JHEP12(2006) 053 [math-ph/0603003]

  25. [25]

    Artemev,x-y swap for a (2, 2p+1) minimal string,Phys

    A. Artemev,x-y swap for a (2, 2p+1) minimal string,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 046019 [2506.09222]

  26. [26]

    Dorn and H

    H. Dorn and H. J. Otto,Two and three point functions in Liouville theory,Nucl. Phys.B429(1994) 375 [hep-th/9403141]

  27. [27]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Structure constants and conformal bootstrap in Liouville field theory,Nucl. Phys.B477(1996) 577 [hep-th/9506136]. – 43 –

  28. [28]

    Teschner,On the Liouville three point function,Phys

    J. Teschner,On the Liouville three point function,Phys. Lett. B363(1995) 65 [hep-th/9507109]

  29. [29]

    Eberhardt,Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks, 2309.11540

    L. Eberhardt,Notes on crossing transformations of Virasoro conformal blocks, 2309.11540

  30. [30]

    Ribault and R

    S. Ribault and R. Santachiara,Liouville theory with a central charge less than one, JHEP08(2015) 109 [1503.02067]

  31. [31]

    V. A. Rodriguez, M. Usatyuk and Z.-Y. Wang,ADE Minimal Strings and Multi-Matrix Duals,2511.21851

  32. [32]

    Khromov and A

    D. Khromov and A. Litvinov,On correlation numbers V 0,4 and V 1,1 in Virasoro minimal string theory,JHEP04(2026) 126 [2509.25960]

  33. [33]

    Eynard,Invariants of spectral curves and intersection theory of moduli spaces of complex curves,Commun

    B. Eynard,Invariants of spectral curves and intersection theory of moduli spaces of complex curves,Commun. Num. Theor. Phys.8(2014) 541 [1110.2949]

  34. [34]

    Dunin-Barkowski, N

    P. Dunin-Barkowski, N. Orantin, S. Shadrin and L. Spitz,Identification of the Givental formula with the spectral curve topological recursion procedure,Commun. Math. Phys.328(2014) 669 [1211.4021]

  35. [35]

    Mazel, J

    B. Mazel, J. Sandor, C. Wang and X. Yin,Conformal Perturbation Theory and Tachyon-Dilaton Eschatology via String Fields,2403.14544

  36. [36]

    V. A. Rodriguez,A two-dimensional string cosmology,JHEP06(2023) 161 [2302.06625]

  37. [37]

    V. A. Rodriguez,The torus one-point diagram in two-dimensional string cosmology, JHEP07(2023) 050 [2304.13043]

  38. [38]

    M. R. Gaberdiel and P. Suchanek,Limits of Minimal Models and Continuous Orbifolds,JHEP03(2012) 104 [1112.1708]

  39. [39]

    Witten,On quantum gauge theories in two-dimensions,Commun

    E. Witten,On quantum gauge theories in two-dimensions,Commun. Math. Phys. 141(1991) 153

  40. [40]

    Witten,Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited,J

    E. Witten,Two-dimensional gauge theories revisited,J. Geom. Phys.9(1992) 303 [hep-th/9204083]

  41. [41]

    Blau and G

    M. Blau and G. Thompson,Lectures on 2-d gauge theories: Topological aspects and path integral techniques,hep-th/9310144

  42. [42]

    Cordes, G

    S. Cordes, G. W. Moore and S. Ramgoolam,Lectures on 2-d Yang-Mills theory, equivariant cohomology and topological field theories,Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl.41 (1995) 184 [hep-th/9411210]

  43. [43]

    Giribet,On AGT description of N=2 SCFT with N(f ) = 4,JHEP01(2010) 097 [0912.1930]

    G. Giribet,On AGT description of N=2 SCFT with N(f ) = 4,JHEP01(2010) 097 [0912.1930]

  44. [44]

    L. F. Alday, D. Gaiotto and Y. Tachikawa,Liouville Correlation Functions from Four-dimensional Gauge Theories,Lett. Math. Phys.91(2010) 167 [0906.3219]

  45. [45]

    Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]

    D. Gaiotto,N=2 dualities,JHEP08(2012) 034 [0904.2715]. – 44 –

  46. [46]

    Eynard, T

    B. Eynard, T. Kimura and S. Ribault,Random matrices,1510.04430

  47. [47]

    Ribault,Conformal field theory on the plane,1406.4290

    S. Ribault,Conformal field theory on the plane,1406.4290

  48. [48]

    Roussillon and I

    J. Roussillon and I. Tsiares,On the Virasoro Crossing Kernels at Rational Central Charge,SciPost Phys.20(2026) 167 [2512.03172]

  49. [49]

    Ribault,Exactly solvable conformal field theories,2411.17262

    S. Ribault,Exactly solvable conformal field theories,2411.17262

  50. [50]

    A. A. Belavin and A. B. Zamolodchikov,Integrals over moduli spaces, ground ring, and four-point function in minimal Liouville gravity,Theor. Math. Phys.147(2006) 729. – 45 –