REVIEW 4 cited by
The Physics of Core-Collapse Supernovae
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Supernovae are nature's grandest explosions and an astrophysical laboratory in which unique conditions exist that are not achievable on Earth. They are also the furnaces in which most of the elements heavier than carbon have been forged. Scientists have argued for decades about the physical mechanism responsible for these explosions. It is clear that the ultimate energy source is gravity, but the relative roles of neutrinos, fluid instabilities, rotation and magnetic fields continue to be debated.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Wild behaviour near the finish line: the Type Ibn SN 2020able and its stratified environment
The Type Ibn supernova SN 2020able exploded inside a stratified, three-component helium-rich envelope, with an inner dense shell from a pre-explosion eruption and an outer shell consistent with a Wolf-Rayet wind.
-
Implications of the UV/optical Plateau of AT2018cow
A wind-and-irradiation disk model fits the AT2018cow UV plateau with accretor masses from 1.4 to ~100 solar masses, removing the need for a >200 solar-mass black hole.
-
OCCAM X. Neutron Capture Abundances with Keck/HIRES & Magellan/MIKE
New high-resolution spectra yield abundances for 7 neutron-capture elements in open cluster stars, revealing flat Milky Way gradients for second-peak s- and r-process species and shallower slopes for first-peak s-process.
-
SN 2025aico: Early observations of a faint Type IIb supernova with a low-mass envelope
SN 2025aico is a low-luminosity Type IIb from a compact He star (M_env≈0.01 M⊙, R_env≈6–10 R⊙) with M_Ni≈0.033 M⊙, M_ej≈2.8 M⊙ and weak-to-moderate 56Ni mixing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.