Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Schwinger pair production in spacetime fields: Moir\'e patterns, Aharonov-Bohm phases and Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read For electric fields that depend on both time and space, two identical pulses interfere when parallel rather than anti-parallel, producing 2D fringes and moiré patterns in the electron-positron momentum spectrum.

desk verdict Solid extension of the open-instanton formalism to multi-peak spacetime fields, with a genuinely new qualitative claim (interference reversal) and 2D spectra; the unresolved instanton-selection issue is real, explicitly flagged, and should be tightened before the spectra are treated as final predictions. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.19709 v2 pith:GG266Q5J submitted 2024-12-27 hep-ph hep-th

Gianluca Degli Esposti , Greger Torgrimsson This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-th
keywords SchwingerpairproductionworldlineinstantonsmomentumspectruminterferencepatternsmoiréAharonov-Bohmphasespacetime-dependentelectricfieldsSturm-Liouvilleeigenvalues
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that adding spatial dependence to a strong electric field reverses the interference rules for Schwinger pair production. For a field depending only on time, two pulses interfere when their signs are opposite, because a particle created at the first pulse always traverses the second; for a spacetime field $E_z(t,z)$, a particle created at one peak generically misses later peaks, so the interfering configuration is the parallel one, $E_z(t,z)+E_z(t-\Delta t,z-\Delta z)$. This opens a genuinely two-dimensional momentum spectrum in the electron and positron longitudinal momenta $p_z,p'_z$, including moiré patterns built from two or more pairs of pulses. The authors reduce each amplitude to a small set of parameters around a momentum saddle point, so the patterns can be predicted quickly without dense grids, and they connect the relative phases to an Aharonov-Bohm term and to an asymptotic eigenvalue expansion of the associated Sturm-Liouville problem.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the open worldline instanton: a complex saddle-point trajectory of the worldline path integral, one per field peak, satisfying the Lorentz-force equation $t''=E z'$, $z''=E t'$, with asymptotic momenta $z'(u_1)=-p_3$, $z'(u_0)=p'_3$ and on-shell constraint $t'^2-z'^2=m_\perp^2$. The interference physics is carried by the imaginary parts of the exponent, expanded quadratically around the real momentum saddle point $\Pi_s=(P_s,\Delta_s)$: $\psi\simeq i\phi-A/2+i\alpha\cdot(\Pi-\Pi_s)+\frac12(\Pi-\Pi_s)\cdot(-d^{-2}+i\beta)\cdot(\Pi-\Pi_s)$. Here $\alpha$ is the fringe wave vector, obtained directly from the instanton's asymptotic endpoints, and $d^{-2}$ and $\beta$ are the peak-width and phase-curvature tensors. For separated identical pulses, the differences $\Delta\alpha$ and $\Delta\beta$ depend only on $\Delta t$, $\Delta z$ and the asymptotic momenta, which is what turns pulse geometry into a design tool for fringe patterns.

What would settle it

A fully momentum-resolved numerical computation of the pair-creation probability for two identical, same-sign spacetime pulses (e.g., field (48) with $\Delta t>0,\Delta z=0$) would settle the central reversal: if the predicted fringes with $\Delta\alpha_P=\Delta t(p'_3/p'_0-p_3/p_0)$ do not appear, the semiclassical sum is incomplete. For the finer moiré claim, computing the Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers for the classes shown in Fig. 14 would show whether the extra instantons must be included.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For a purely time-dependent field $E_z(t)$, longitudinal momentum conservation forces $p_z+p'_z=0$, so spectra and interference are one-dimensional, and two identical pulses interfere only when they are anti-parallel (opposite signs), since the instanton from the first pulse always passes through the second. For $E_z(t,z)$, $p_z$ and $p'_z$ are independent, and a particle born at one peak reaches a later peak only for special momenta; in the generic case the parallel configuration interferes. The relative phase between the two pulse amplitudes is $\Delta\phi+\Delta\alpha\cdot(\Pi-\Pi_s)+\dots$, with $\Delta\alpha_P=\Delta t(p'_3/p'_0-p_3/p_0)$ and $\Delta\alpha_\Delta=\Delta z+\Delta t(p'_3/p'_0+p_3/p_0)/2$, so the fringe orientation is set by the pulse separation $(\Delta t,\Delta z)$. Superimposing pulse pairs with different separations gives moiré patterns in the $p_z-p'_z$ plane, and a time-separated pair acquires an Aharonov-Bohm phase equal to $-\mathrm{sign}(\Delta t)$ times the flux of the field between the instanton paths. The paper verifies these predictions with a grid method and a quadratic approximation, and develops a Volterra-integral asymptotic expansion for the Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues that corrects the Gelfand-Yaglom product of eigenvalues to high precision.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the only instanton classes that contribute are those continuously connected to the momentum-space saddle point; the paper does not compute the Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers that decide this, so additional instanton classes could alter the interference patterns and even the parallel/anti-parallel condition in some momentum regions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two identical spacetime pulses with the same sign and separation produce cosine fringes whose direction rotates continuously with the pulse separation; purely spatial separation gives stripes along one momentum axis and purely temporal separation gives stripes along the other.
  • Adding a second pair of pulses at a different separation superimposes two fringe systems at different angles, producing moiré patterns in the $p_z-p'_z$ plane; the same 2D structure appears with three pulses.
  • In the locally-constant-field limit the fringe frequency grows as $1/\gamma$, so beyond a detector's resolution the spectrum becomes an incoherent sum over peaks: $N$ pulses give about $N$ times the single-pulse probability.
  • A time-separated pulse pair acquires an Aharonov-Bohm phase proportional to the integrated field, while a purely space-separated pair does not, making the total relative phase a geometric quantity set by pulse placement.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the reversal survives full non-semiclassical checks, it inverts a standard intuition: strongly space-time-structured fields make parallel (same-sign) pulses the natural interferometers, and spatial separation can suppress fringes where a time-only field would show them.
  • Because the fringe wave vector is a linear function of pulse separations, multi-pulse designs could act as programmable momentum-space masks; the paper establishes the ingredients but does not develop this application.
  • The Volterra eigenvalue expansion for the two-component Sturm-Liouville problem is portable: similar $1/m$ corrections could improve fluctuation-prefactor products in other instanton computations where long proper-time intervals make direct eigenvalue counting expensive.
  • A decisive numerical check not yet performed on both momenta would be a fully momentum-resolved simulation of two same-sign spacetime pulses: if fringes do not track the paper's $\Delta\alpha$ formulas, the semiclassical sum is missing a contribution.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a worldline-instanton formalism for computing the momentum-resolved spectrum of Schwinger pair production in spacetime-dependent electric fields with multiple stationary points. The authors extend their previous open-instanton approach to include multiple instanton contributions, derive a quadratic approximation around momentum saddle points, and use it to obtain simple formulas for the interference phases and widths. They report a qualitative reversal of the interference condition relative to time-dependent fields: for E(t,z) two identical pulses generically interfere when they are parallel, rather than anti-parallel as for E(t). They also predict 2D interference patterns, including moiré patterns, an Aharonov-Bohm phase for separated pulses, complex momentum saddle points for the integrated probability, and a large-n asymptotic expansion for the eigenvalues of the Sturm-Liouville problem that controls the fluctuation prefactor, verified against Gelfand-Yaglom and numerics.

Significance. The paper's strongest contributions are concrete, falsifiable predictions (interference reversal, moiré patterns, AB phase) and a set of parameter-free formulas, Eqs. (51)-(55), that can be used to design field configurations. The numerical work is extensive and carefully cross-checked: the quadratic approximation is compared with a grid approach, and the eigenvalue product is compared with Gelfand-Yaglom and Mathematica NDEigenvalues. If the completeness of the instanton sum can be established (or the claims appropriately restricted), the method would be a useful tool for strong-field QED in multidimensional fields, where alternative approaches are numerically heavy. The paper is also honest in flagging its limitations, particularly the unresolved Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sec. VI.H; Eq. (35)] The spectrum formula (35) sums over the instanton classes q(a) (and their symmetric partners) that are continuously connected to the momentum-space saddle point Πs. The authors show in Sec. VI.H that this set is not obviously complete: numerical continuation to P = −0.5, Δ = 0 for the field (66) with positions (77) reveals additional instanton classes q(3), q(4), q(5) with the same asymptotic momenta. They further state that whether such saddle points should be included is determined by Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers, which are not computed, and they demonstrate that at least q(3) appears physical in some momentum regions (e.g., the Eb → 0 limit) while becoming exponentially large (and hence unphysical) along gradient flow elsewhere. Because Eq. (35) omits these classes, the interference patterns in Figs. 6 and 8 and the abstract's claim that parallel spacetime pulses 'typically' interfere are not established as the complete semiclassical answer. This is a load-bearing issue for the paper's central qualitative claims. The authors should either compute the intersection numbers, or restrict the claims to a momentum region where completeness can be argued, or show numerically that the additional classes do not contribute in the plotted regions.
  2. [Sec. VI.G; Eqs. (79)-(80)] The 'generic' no-scattering assumption used to justify the interference reversal is not robust. The criterion (79)-(80), based on whether the asymptotic straight-line path of the instanton from pulse a hits pulse b, is shown in Sec. VI.G to fail in nonzero-measure regions: for the field (66) with positions (77), numerical continuation from Πs to P = −0.5, Δ = 0 yields an instanton that is still scattered by pulse b even though the asymptotic real path lies far from the wedge Δ ∼ ±2P. The paper's own Fig. 12 shows large differences between the grid and quadratic results both near and outside the wedge. The claim that two spacetime pulses 'will typically give interference' should therefore be formulated with an explicit domain of validity, and the status of the omitted scattered configurations should be clarified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. VI.F] After Eq. (55), 'From (53), (55) and (55)' should read 'From (53)-(55)', since Eq. (55) is cited twice.
  2. [Sec. VI.G] The wedge condition |Δ| ≲ 2P in Eq. (80) is only meaningful for P > 0; the text should state the general condition, because the subsequent discussion explicitly considers P = −0.5.
  3. [Sec. VII] In the caption of Fig. 15, the reference 'Fig. (15)' should be 'Fig. 15' for consistency with the journal style.
  4. [Sec. I and Sec. VIII] The statement that previous studies of E(t,z) focused on only one momentum variable is supported by Refs. [30,31], but the wording 'as far as we are aware' should be kept in the conclusions as well, since the literature on Wigner approaches is broad.
  5. [General] The paper alternates between p3, p′3 and P, Δ with a single change-of-variable definition in Eq. (21); a short notation table or a reminder at the start of Sec. VI would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the interference reversal, moiré patterns, and Aharonov-Bohm phase are computed from the Lorentz-force equation and the worldline action; prior self-citations are calculational tools, and the Lefschetz-thimble completeness issue is explicitly left open.

full rationale

The paper's central new claims are derived, not assumed. The condition that two separated spacetime pulses interfere when parallel follows from the no-scattering geometry: the instanton from one pulse misses the other, so the two amplitude terms share the same asymptotic momenta, and the relative phase Δα·(Π−Πs) is computed explicitly from the field and the instanton (Eqs. 51–52, 64). This is not a fitted or predefined result; it is a consequence of solving the Lorentz-force equation. The moiré patterns are obtained by numerical evaluation of the amplitude sum (35), and the quadratic approximation agrees with the independent grid method (Figs. 7, 9). The Aharonov-Bohm phase μ_AB is obtained via Stokes' theorem from the gauge potential, not inserted by hand. The eigenvalue expansion (Sec. VII) is benchmarked against the independent Gelfand-Yaglom method and against the known constant-field limit (Eq. 100), so it is not self-referential. The amplitude prefactor (12) and the physical-contour construction are imported from the authors' prior papers [23–25,35], but those are published, parameter-free derivations used as calculational tools; they do not contain the interference reversal or moiré conditions, which are new to this paper. The paper explicitly acknowledges that the sum over instanton classes may be incomplete, deferring Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers to future work and showing that some additional instantons become unphysical in certain regions (Sec. VI.H). This is a completeness/correctness caveat, not a circular definition: the paper's predictions are not equivalent to its inputs by construction. No equation in the paper reduces a claimed output to an input fitted parameter, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled in via self-citation to force the central result.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation uses standard QED and semiclassical saddle-point methods. The only paper-specific assumptions are the physical-contour construction and the truncation of the instanton sum; the latter is explicitly acknowledged as unresolved.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Saddle-point approximation is valid for E0 << 1, with all terms except spin of order 1/E0.
    Used throughout to evaluate the worldline path integral and momentum integrals (Sec. II, after Eq. 5).
  • domain assumption The 'physical contour' and the open-instanton representation of the amplitude from prior work by the same authors apply to multi-peak fields.
    Invoked from [23,24,25] in Sec. II; not re-derived here.
  • domain assumption Only instanton classes continuously connected to Πs contribute; Lefschetz-thimble intersection numbers are not computed.
    Sec. VI.H states this is beyond scope; the numerical grid and quadratic approximations include only these instantons.
  • domain assumption For well-separated pulses, the instanton from one pulse generically does not pass through the other pulse.
    Sec. VI, used to derive the phase differences (51)-(55) and the Fabry-Perot result; scattering cases are treated separately.
  • standard math LSZ reduction and the worldline representation of the fermion propagator in a background field.
    Starting point, Eqs. (3)-(4), standard QFT.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Schwinger pair production in spacetime fields: Moir\'e patterns, Aharonov-Bohm phases and Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GG266Q5J

@misc{pith2026241219709,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Schwinger pair production in spacetime fields: Moir\'e patterns, Aharonov-Bohm phases and Sturm-Liouville eigenvalues},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GG266Q5J}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.19709}
}
abstract

We use a worldline-instanton formalism to study the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair production in spacetime fields with multiple stationary points. We show that the interference structure changes fundamentally when going from purely time-dependent to space-time-dependent fields. For example, it was known that two time-dependent pulses give interference if they are anti-parallel, i.e. $E_z(t)-E_z(t-\Delta t)$, but here we show that two spacetime pulses will typically give interference if they instead are parallel, i.e. $E_z(t,z)+E_z(t-\Delta t,z-\Delta z)$. We take into account the fact that the momenta of the electron, $p_z$, and of the positron, $p'_z$, are independent for $E_z(t,z)$ (it would be $p_z+p'_z=0$ for $E(t)$), and find a type of fields which give moir\'e patterns in the $p_z-p'_z$ plane. Depending on the separation of two pulses, we also find an Aharonov-Bohm phase. We also study complex momentum saddle points in order to obtain the integrated probability from the spectrum. Finally, we calculate an asymptotic expansion for the eigenvalues of the Sturm-Liouville equation that corresponds to the saddle-point approximation of the worldline path integral, use that expansion to compute the product of eigenvalues, and compare with the result obtained with the Gelfand-Yaglom method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.19709 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Spectra for the fields (36) (left) and (37) (right) with parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Complex instanton ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Contour plot shows the field (36). Instanton of Fig. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (15 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. One of the two complex-momentum instantons ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Instanton components evaluated along the yellow contour in Fig. 4 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: B. Aharonov-Bohm phase The following contribution is more nontrivial, −iψ = Z du qµ ∂µAν dq ν du . (56) Using the Lorentz-force equation and partial integration6 gives −iψ = Z du(qq′′ − q ′ µA µ ) . (57) So for Aµ(q) = A (1) µ (q − qa) + A (1) µ (q − qb) (58) we find −…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Moiré patterns in the spectrum produced by four Gaussian peaks (66) placed as in (67), with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. The “grid” lines are obtained by computing instantons at each point on a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: We chose four pulses in the above example in order to have two pairs and hence two patterns that can form a combined pattern in a way similar to what one might usually think of as moiré patterns. We can though obtain 2D patterns in the p3 − p ′ 3 plane with only three …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Moiré pattern in momentum spectrum for three sepa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Same case as in Fig. 8. The “grid” lines are obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Ingredients for pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Spectrum for (66) with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Same notation as in Fig. 10, but for pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Spectrum for three pulses (69) placed as in (81), with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Real part of instantons for two Gaussian pulses, with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Comparisons (111) for one of the two instantons of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: [1] F. Sauter, “Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homo￾genen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,” Z. Phys. 69 (1931) 742 [2] J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po￾larization,” Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 664 [3] E. Brezin and C. Itzyk…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homo- genen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,

    F. Sauter, “Über das Verhalten eines Elektrons im homo- genen elektrischen Feld nach der relativistischen Theorie Diracs,” Z. Phys.69 (1931) 742

    1931

  2. [2]

    quadratic-approximation

    and com- pute instantons at each point. In cases of interference, there are more than one instanton for each value of (p3, p′ 3). Given the much larger number of instantons that need to be computed, this approach is significantly slower than the following “quadratic-approximation” ap- proach. Each amplitude term has the form M (Π) = C(Π) eψ(Π) , (17) wher...

    work page

  3. [3]

    creation happens

    Thus, as far as we are aware, these moiré patterns have not been seen before. Our instanton formalism also allows us to see Aharonov-Bohm phases for 2D fields with more than one peak. In the application of WKB toE(t) fields with a single peak, [4, 5] expanded the exponential part of the spec- trum around the momentum saddle point, P(p3) ∝ exp −A −p2 3 d2 ...

    work page

  4. [4]

    grid” lines are obtained by computing instantons at each point on a10 × 10 grid over the rectangle0 < P <1 and −1 < ∆ < 1. The “quadratic

    + ψAB , (59) where ψAB = − Z du q′∆A , (60) ∆qµ = qµ b − qµ a and ∆Aµ = A(1) µ (q + ∆q) − A(1) µ (q − ∆q) . (61) ψAB is an Aharonov-Bohm term [36, 37]. Using Stokes’ theorem we can rewrite it as ψAB = − Z R dtdz F(t, z) , (62) where R is the region between the curvesq(u) + ∆q and q(u) − ∆q. Since we have assumed that∆q is sufficiently large so that the tw...

    work page

  5. [5]

    On gauge invariance and vacuum po- larization,

    J. S. Schwinger, “On gauge invariance and vacuum po- larization,” Phys. Rev.82 (1951) 664

    1951

  6. [6]

    Pairproductioninvacuumby an alternating field,

    E.BrezinandC.Itzykson, “Pairproductioninvacuumby an alternating field,” Phys. Rev. D2, 1191-1199 (1970)

    work page 1970

  7. [7]

    Pair Production in a Variable and Homo- geneous Electric Field as an Oscillator Problem

    V. S. Popov, “Pair Production in a Variable and Homo- geneous Electric Field as an Oscillator Problem”, JETP 35 659 (1972)

    work page 1972

  8. [8]

    Imaginary-time method in quantum me- chanics and field theory,

    V. S. Popov, “Imaginary-time method in quantum me- chanics and field theory,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 68, 686 (2005)

    work page 2005

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Schwinger pair production via instantons in a strong electric field,

    S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, “Schwinger pair production via instantons in a strong electric field,” Phys. Rev. D 65, 105002 (2002) [arXiv:hep-th/0005078 [hep-th]]

    2002 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Improved Approximations for Fermion Pair Production in Inhomogeneous Electric Fields,

    S. P. Kim and D. N. Page, “Improved Approximations for Fermion Pair Production in Inhomogeneous Electric Fields,” Phys. Rev. D 75, 045013 (2007) [arXiv:hep- th/0701047 [hep-th]]

    2007

  3. [11]

    The Stokes Phe- nomenon and Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production in Time-Dependent Laser Pulses,

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, “The Stokes Phe- nomenon and Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production in Time-Dependent Laser Pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 250402 (2010) [arXiv:1004.2509 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  4. [12]

    Interference Ef- fects in Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production for Time- Dependent Laser Pulses,

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, “Interference Ef- fects in Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production for Time- Dependent Laser Pulses,” Phys. Rev. D 83, 065028 (2011) [arXiv:1102.2899 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Semiclassical pair pro- duction rate for time-dependent electrical fields with more than one component: WKB-approach and world- line instantons,

    E. Strobel and S. S. Xue, “Semiclassical pair pro- duction rate for time-dependent electrical fields with more than one component: WKB-approach and world- line instantons,” Nucl. Phys. B 886, 1153-1176 (2014) [arXiv:1312.3261 [hep-th]]

    2014 arXiv

  6. [14]

    Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,

    C. Schubert, “Perturbative quantum field theory in the string inspired formalism,” Phys. Rept. 355, 73-234 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0101036 [hep-th]]

    2001 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Quantum mechanical path integrals in the first quantised approach to quantum field theory,

    J. P. Edwards and C. Schubert, “Quantum mechanical path integrals in the first quantised approach to quantum field theory,” [arXiv:1912.10004 [hep-th]]

    1912

  8. [16]

    Pair Produc- tion at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,

    I. K. Affleck, O. Alvarez and N. S. Manton, “Pair Produc- tion at Strong Coupling in Weak External Fields,” Nucl. Phys. B197, 509-519 (1982)

    1982

  9. [17]

    Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogeneous fields,

    G. V. Dunne and C. Schubert, “Worldline instantons and pair production in inhomogeneous fields,” Phys. Rev. D 72, 105004 (2005) [arXiv:hep-th/0507174 [hep-th]]

    2005 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Worldline instantons. II. The Fluctuation prefactor,

    G. V. Dunne, Q. h. Wang, H. Gies and C. Schubert, “Worldline instantons. II. The Fluctuation prefactor,” Phys. Rev. D73, 065028 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0602176 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Complex World- line Instantons and Quantum Interference in Vacuum Pair Production,

    C. K. Dumlu and G. V. Dunne, “Complex World- line Instantons and Quantum Interference in Vacuum Pair Production,” Phys. Rev. D 84, 125023 (2011) [arXiv:1110.1657 [hep-th]]

    2011 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Electron- Positron Pair Production in an Elliptic Polarized Time Varying Field

    X. Bai-Song, M. Melike and D. Sayipjamal, “Electron- Positron Pair Production in an Elliptic Polarized Time Varying Field”, Chinese Phys. Lett.29, 021102 (2012)

    2012

  13. [21]

    Nonpertur- bative pair production in interpolating fields,

    A. Ilderton, G. Torgrimsson and J. Wårdh, “Nonpertur- bative pair production in interpolating fields,” Phys. Rev. D 92, no.6, 065001 (2015) [arXiv:1506.09186 [hep-th]]

    2015 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Sauter-Schwinger Effect for Collid- ing Laser Pulses,

    C. Kohlfürst, N. Ahmadiniaz, J. Oertel and R. Schützhold, “Sauter-Schwinger Effect for Collid- ing Laser Pulses,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, no.24, 241801 23 (2022) [arXiv:2107.08741 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Multidimensional World- line Instantons,

    G. V. Dunne and Q. h. Wang, “Multidimensional World- line Instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 74, 065015 (2006) [arXiv:hep-th/0608020 [hep-th]]

    2006 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Dis- crete worldline instantons,

    C. Schneider, G. Torgrimsson and R. Schützhold, “Dis- crete worldline instantons,” Phys. Rev. D 98, no.8, 085009 (2018) [arXiv:1806.00943 [hep-th]]

    2018 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Thermal Schwinger pair pro- duction at arbitrary coupling,

    O. Gould and A. Rajantie, “Thermal Schwinger pair pro- duction at arbitrary coupling,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.7, 076002 (2017) [arXiv:1704.04801 [hep-th]]

    2017 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Worldline instan- tons for nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production and Compton scattering,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Worldline instan- tons for nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production and Compton scattering,” Phys. Rev. D 105, no.9, 096036 (2022) [arXiv:2112.11433 [hep-ph]]

    2022 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Worldline instan- tons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair pro- duction in spacetime dependent fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Worldline instan- tons for the momentum spectrum of Schwinger pair pro- duction in spacetime dependent fields,” Phys. Rev. D 107, no.5, 056019 (2023) [arXiv:2212.11578 [hep-ph]]

    2023 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Momentum spec- trum of Schwinger pair production in four-dimensional e-dipole fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Momentum spec- trum of Schwinger pair production in four-dimensional e-dipole fields,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.1, 016013 (2024) [arXiv:2308.01659 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Momentum signatures for Schwinger pair production in short laser pulses with sub-cycle structure,

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer, G. V. Dunne and H. Gies, “Momentum signatures for Schwinger pair production in short laser pulses with sub-cycle structure,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 150404 (2009) [arXiv:0901.2631 [hep-ph]]

    2009 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production in Chirped Laser Pulses,

    C. K. Dumlu, “Schwinger Vacuum Pair Production in Chirped Laser Pulses,” Phys. Rev. D82, 045007 (2010) [arXiv:1006.3882 [hep-th]]

    2010 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Ramsey Fringes and Time-domain Multiple-Slit Interference from Vacuum,

    E. Akkermans and G. V. Dunne, “Ramsey Fringes and Time-domain Multiple-Slit Interference from Vacuum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030401 (2012) [arXiv:1109.3489 [hep-th]]

    2012 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Particle self- bunching in the Schwinger effect in spacetime-dependent electric fields,

    F. Hebenstreit, R. Alkofer and H. Gies, “Particle self- bunching in the Schwinger effect in spacetime-dependent electric fields,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 180403 (2011) [arXiv:1106.6175 [hep-ph]]

    2011 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Electron-positron pair production in in- homogeneous electromagnetic fields,

    C. Kohlfürst, “Electron-positron pair production in in- homogeneous electromagnetic fields,” [arXiv:1512.06082 [hep-ph]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Effects of finite spatial extent on Schwinger pair production,

    M. Ababekri, B. S. Xie and J. Zhang, “Effects of finite spatial extent on Schwinger pair production,” Phys. Rev. D 100, no.1, 016003 (2019) [arXiv:1905.01629 [hep-ph]]

    2019 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Pair production in temporally and spatially oscillating fields,

    I. A. Aleksandrov and C. Kohlfürst, “Pair production in temporally and spatially oscillating fields,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.9, 096009 (2020) [arXiv:1912.09924 [hep-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Quantum field theory

    C. Itzykson and J. B. Zuber, “Quantum field theory”, McGraw-Hill (1980)

    1980

  29. [37]

    Pair Production In An Electric Field In A Time Dependent Gauge,

    A. O. Barut and I. H. Duru, “Pair Production In An Electric Field In A Time Dependent Gauge,” Phys. Rev. D 41 (1990) 1312

    1990

  30. [38]

    Momentum spec- trum of nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production in space-time fields,

    G. Degli Esposti and G. Torgrimsson, “Momentum spec- trum of nonlinear Breit-Wheeler pair production in space-time fields,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.7, 076017 (2024) [arXiv:2312.17186 [hep-ph]]

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Significance of electromag- netic potentials in the quantum theory,

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, “Significance of electromag- netic potentials in the quantum theory,” Phys. Rev.115, 485-491 (1959)

    1959

  32. [40]

    The Refractive Index in Electron Optics and the Principles of Dynamics

    W. Ehrenberg and R. E. Siday, “The Refractive Index in Electron Optics and the Principles of Dynamics” Proc. Phys. Soc. B62, 8 (1949)

    1949

  33. [41]

    Coherentquantumenhancementofpairpro- duction in the null domain,

    A.Ilderton, “Coherentquantumenhancementofpairpro- duction in the null domain,” Phys. Rev. D 101, no.1, 016006 (2020) [arXiv:1910.03012 [quant-ph]]

    2020 arXiv

  34. [42]

    A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,

    I. Aniceto, G. Basar and R. Schiappa, “A Primer on Resurgent Transseries and Their Asymptotics,” Phys. Rept. 809, 1-135 (2019) [arXiv:1802.10441 [hep-th]]

    2019 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Methods of mathematical physics

    R. Courant and D. Hilbert, “Methods of mathematical physics”, Volume 1, Interscience Publishers, New York 1953

    1953

  36. [44]

    Large Eigenvalues and Trace Formulas for Matrix Sturm-Liouville Problems

    R. Carlson, “Large Eigenvalues and Trace Formulas for Matrix Sturm-Liouville Problems”, SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis30, 949 (1999)

    1999

  37. [45]

    The Calculus of Variations In the Large

    M. Morse, “The Calculus of Variations In the Large”, AMS Colloquium SeriesXVIII, (AMS, New York, 1934)

    1934

  38. [46]

    A New Approach to Gaussian Path Integrals and the Evaluation of the Semiclassical Propagator,

    S. Levit and U. Smilansky, “A New Approach to Gaussian Path Integrals and the Evaluation of the Semiclassical Propagator,” Annals Phys.103, 198 (1977)

    1977

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.