Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Topological Stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read In the eikonal limit, the renormalized angular momentum of scalar perturbations on a Topological Star resums exactly into generalized hypergeometric functions, extending the Schwarzschild result through a direct link to the null geodesic…

desk verdict Useful TS extension of the Schwarzschild eikonal resummation, but the 'exact' claim outruns the proof, and the radial-action derivation in Appendix B has a real endpoint gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.14442 v1 pith:GJJKH5VG submitted 2025-06-17 gr-qc

Donato Bini , Giorgio Di Russo This is my paper
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C1033C2083C25
keywords renormalizedangularmomentumTopologicalStareikonallimithypergeometricresummationnullgeodesicradialactionscalarwaveequationscatteringangleMSTformalism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that for a Topological Star — a horizonless compact object in a five-dimensional Einstein-Maxwell theory, reduced to four dimensions — the renormalized angular momentum parameter $\nu$ of scalar perturbations admits an exact resummation in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions in the eikonal limit (large angular momentum at fixed $M E/J$). This is achieved by establishing a direct link, in that limit, between $\nu$ and the radial action of null geodesics of the background, a link previously known only for Schwarzschild and here extended to the one-parameter Topological-Star family with parameter $\alpha=r_b/r_s$ ($\alpha=0$ recovers Schwarzschild). The representative closed form is $G^{(1)}(x)=-\frac{3}{4}x^2\,{}_3F_2(\{\frac{1}{2},\frac{5}{6},\frac{7}{6}\},\{\frac{3}{2},2\},27x^2)$, with analogous resummed expressions for the higher-order coefficients $G^{(2)}$ through $G^{(6)}$ and for the scattering-angle coefficients. A sympathetic reader cares because these closed forms replace Post-Newtonian series that by construction cannot enter the strong-field region, providing analytic strong-field data for perturbations of this family of compact objects.

What carries the argument

The central object is the renormalized angular momentum parameter $\nu$, equivalently $G=(\nu-l)/(2l+1)$, defined by the compatibility condition of the three-term recursion relation appearing in both the MST and qSW treatments of the separated wave equation. The identity chain that carries the argument is: in the eikonal limit $l\to\infty$ with $x=\epsilon/(2l+1)=M E/J$ fixed, the expansion in the star's parameter $\alpha$ gives $G=G^{(0)}(x)+\alpha G^{(1)}(x)+\alpha^2G^{(2)}(x)+\cdots$, and each $G^{(n)}$ is equated to the order-$\alpha^n$ piece of the large-impact-parameter expansion of the null geodesic radial action $I_r^{\rm hyp}(b)$. Those pieces are then resummed exactly into generalized hypergeometric functions — power series whose coefficients are products of rising factorials, such as ${}_3F_2(\{a_1,a_2,a_3\},\{b_1,b_2\};z)$ — of argument $27x^2=(b_{\rm crit}/b)^2$. The Appendix B machinery (substitution $u=\xi/\hat{b}$, Post-Minkowskian expansion of the integrand, and term-by-term hypergeometric summation) is what converts the radial action into the closed forms listed in Table II.

What would settle it

Numerically evaluate the TS radial action $I_r(\hat{b})$ keeping the exact upper limit $\hat{b}u_{\max}$ (rather than its leading-order value $1+O(1/\hat{b})$), expand the result in powers of $1/\hat{b}$ and in powers of $\alpha$, and compare the coefficients with the $G^{(n)}(x)$ of Table II. Any mismatch at any order would show that the endpoint truncation contaminates the claimed exact resummations, falsifying the equality between $\nu$ and the radial action in the Topological-Star case.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with the scalar ($s=0$) wave equation in the reduced four-dimensional Topological-Star metric, the paper defines $\gamma(l,0,\epsilon)=\nu(l,0,\epsilon)-l$ and the rescaled object $G(l,0,\epsilon)=\gamma/c(l)$ with $c(l)=2l+1$. In the eikonal limit $l\to\infty$ at fixed $x=\epsilon/c(l)=M E/J=1/\hat{b}$, the perturbation-theory expansion $G=\sum_k A_{2k}(L)x^{2k}$ tends to the universal Schwarzschild function $G_0(x)$ plus corrections $G^{(n)}(x)$ at order $\alpha^n$, and each $G^{(n)}(x)$ is shown to match the corresponding term in the large-$b$ expansion of the null geodesic radial action $I_r^{\rm hyp}(b)=\int_{r_0}^{\infty} p_r\,dr$. The paper's original contribution is the exact resummation of this TS radial action, performed in Appendix B by substituting $u=\xi/\hat{b}$ and expanding in inverse powers of $\hat{b}$; this yields closed forms such as $G^{(1)}(x)=-\frac{3}{4}x^2\,{}_3F_2(\{\frac{1}{2},\frac{5}{6},\frac{7}{6}\},\{\frac{3}{2},2\},27x^2)$, $G^{(2)}(x)=\frac{1}{2}G^{(1)}(x)$, and analogous expressions for $G^{(3)}$ through $G^{(6)}$, together with resummed scattering-angle coefficients $\chi^{(1)}_0,\chi^{(2)}_0,\chi^{(3)}_0$ for massless probes. The paper thus establishes the eikonal-limit equivalence between the renormalized angular momentum, a spectral datum of the wave equation, and the null radial action, a geometric datum of the background, for the whole Topological-Star family.

Load-bearing premise

The exact resummation assumes that the upper end of the radial integral, $\hat{b}u_{\max}$, may be replaced by its leading-order value $1+O(1/\hat{b})$, and that the omitted endpoint corrections never contribute at any order in the large-impact-parameter expansion; the paper gives no proof that this truncation is harmless.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The eikonal-limit renormalized angular momentum for Topological Stars becomes a closed hypergeometric function of $x=M E/J$, giving analytic strong-field expressions where Post-Newtonian series fail.
  • The resummed scattering-angle coefficients $\chi^{(1)}_0,\chi^{(2)}_0,\chi^{(3)}_0$ (Eqs. A15–A17) provide order-by-order analytic targets for numerical or self-force computations on Topological-Star backgrounds.
  • Because $\nu$ is tied to the radial action, the bound-to-unbound map carries over to $\nu$, and the hypergeometric connection formulae allow analytic continuation of the eikonal data across the critical impact parameter $b_{\rm crit}=3\sqrt{3}M$.
  • The $\alpha$-expansion structure means every order in the star's deformation parameter has its own resummation, so strong-field observables become analytic functions of both $x$ and $\alpha$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resummation strategy could be applied to the massive-probe scattering angle whose coefficients are tabulated in Appendix A but not resummed into closed form here.
  • The endpoint-truncation assumption can be tested numerically at moderate cost; if it survives, the $\nu$–radial-action equivalence becomes a stronger geometric statement valid for the whole $\alpha$-family.
  • Since the resummed functions are singular at $27x^2=1$ (the critical impact parameter), they may also provide a starting point for analytically continuing perturbation-theory quantities across the photon-sphere threshold, which the paper does not pursue.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies scalar perturbations (s=0) on Topological Star (TS) spacetimes and claims two results: (i) a direct connection between the renormalized angular momentum parameter ν and the null geodesic radial action in the eikonal limit, and (ii) exact resummations of the eikonal functions G^(n)(x), defined as coefficients of the α-expansion of γ/c(l), in terms of generalized hypergeometric functions. The Schwarzschild case is reviewed following Ref. [19], and the TS case is treated by expanding the TS metric factor (1−2αu)^{-1/2} and resumming the resulting series. The main new output is Table I (expanded forms up to O(x^18)) and Table II (resummed forms for n=0,…,6), with the derivation of the radial action delegated to Appendix B. The paper also contains resummed scattering-angle expressions in Appendix A.

Significance. If the resummations are correct, the paper provides analytic, strong-field/eikonal data for scalar perturbations on Topological Star spacetimes, extending the recent universal-tail programme of Ref. [19] to horizonless compact objects. The explicit expansions in Table I, the closed forms in Table II, and the fact that the α→0 limit correctly reproduces the Schwarzschild results are concrete strengths; the results are checkable and contain no fitted parameters. The connection between ν and the radial action, if made rigorous, would be physically illuminating for QNM and self-force applications. However, the gap between the displayed finite-order expansions and the claimed exactness is substantial, and the radial-action derivation in Appendix B contains an unproven truncation that is central to the paper's claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix B, after Eq. (B10)] The replacement of the upper integration limit by hat b*u_max = 1+O(1/hat b) is not justified and is load-bearing for the claimed exactness. The omitted interval [1, hat b*u_max] has length O(1/hat b), and near the true turning point the integrand in (B4) behaves as sqrt(hat b*u_max − xi) times a regular factor; the endpoint contribution is therefore O(hat b^{−3/2}) = O(x^{3/2}), a non-integer power that the termwise integer-power expansion in (B7)–(B11) cannot represent. The paper gives no argument that this contribution cancels, is exponentially suppressed, or is absorbed into the IR subtraction. Since the resummed radial-action expressions in (B14) are used to justify the G^(n) identities in Table II, this unexamined truncation directly affects the central claim.
  2. [Section V and Table II] The hypergeometric resummations for G^(1) through G^(6) are inferred by inspection of the first nine or ten coefficients in Table I (see the discussion before Eq. (5.1) and the phrase 'by inspection' in Section II), but no all-orders proof is supplied. For a generalized hypergeometric function, exactness requires that the coefficient sequence obey the corresponding first-order rational recurrence for all orders, or that the closed form be derived from a known integral or recurrence. The paper demonstrates only a finite-order match. Consequently the word 'exact' in the title and abstract is stronger than what has been established. The authors should either provide an all-orders proof (e.g., from the confluent-Heun three-term recurrence or from an exact evaluation of the radial-action integral) or explicitly present the resummations as conjectures supported to the displayed order.
  3. [Section IV.C and Appendix B] The identification between the resummed radial action pieces I_α^i in Eq. (B14) and the eikonal functions G^(i)(x) in Table II is never shown explicitly. For Schwarzschild this relation is written in Eq. (3.23), but the analogous TS formula is absent: the factors EM/hat b^2, the constant subtractions, and the normalizations in (B14) are not matched order by order with the expansions in Table I. Without this matching, the central conceptual claim that ν is directly related to the TS radial action is asserted rather than demonstrated. The derivation should make the coefficient-by-coefficient identification explicit at least up to the orders displayed in Table I and Eq. (B14).
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (2.34)] The sum starts at n=1 but contains a denominator n−1, which is singular at n=1; the sum should presumably begin at n=2.
  2. [Table I] The entry '1/2 G1(x)' in the row for G^(2)(x) appears to be a stray notation; it should be removed or clarified as 1/2 G^(1)(x).
  3. [Throughout] The phrase 'Topologial Star' is a typo for 'Topological Star' and appears several times.
  4. [Eq. (A9)] There is a double '+ +' before the r^{11} term in the expansion of χ^{(0)}; this should be cleaned up.
  5. [Abstract / Table II] The abstract claims an 'exact resummation' without qualification, but Table II provides resummed forms only for n=0,…,6; the statement should be made precise.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: two independent computations (MST-type recurrence vs. null radial action) are matched to produce the G^(n) resummations; self-citations are background inputs, and the Schwarzschild anchor is external work.

full rationale

The claimed results are established by comparing two independently computed series rather than by fitting or by definitional identification. On the MST/qSW side, the renormalized angular momentum ν (and hence G = (ν−l)/c(l)) is defined by the compatibility condition of the three-term recurrence (4.11)-(4.12); the TS recurrence and the coefficients (4.10), (4.18) are taken from the same group's earlier papers [14,30,32,34], but those papers do not contain the eikonal hypergeometric resummations, and the recurrence coefficients are parameter-free inputs that do not assume the target identity. On the geodesic side, Appendix B integrates the TS null radial momentum (B1)-(B4) independently of ν and obtains closed hypergeometric forms (B14); the Table II G^(n)(x) forms are then the statement that these two series agree term by term, so the equality is a genuine derived claim rather than an input. The Schwarzschild anchor for the ν-to-radial-action relation is Ref. [19] (external authors), and the radial-action checks (2.33)-(2.37) are re-derivations, not imports. No data or fitted constants enter anywhere; all steps are analytic. The one caveat worth flagging is Appendix B's replacement of the upper integration limit, bhat*u_max = 1 + O(1/bhat), by its leading value after Eq. (B10): the omitted endpoint interval could contribute non-integer powers (e.g., x^(3/2)) to the radial action, which would make the 'exact' status of the Table II closed forms incomplete. That is a correctness/exactness risk, not a circular reduction, because the target result is not assumed in its own proof; the self-citations are non-load-bearing background inputs and therefore do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted to data; α and x are spacetime and kinematic variables. The paper introduces no new particles or fields. The load rests on imported recurrences, the Schwarzschild ν-radial action link, and two unproven analytic assumptions: all-orders resummation by inspection, and truncation of the radial action upper limit.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The scalar perturbation equation in TS spacetime reduces to the three-term recurrence (4.11)-(4.12) with parameters ε, κ, τ as given.
    This recurrence is taken from prior TS papers [14,30,32,34] by the same group; no derivation is repeated here. The central ν expansions (4.10), (4.18) depend on it.
  • domain assumption The eikonal limit of ν equals, or is directly linked to, the null geodesic radial action, as established for Schwarzschild in Ref [19], and this relation continues to hold for TS.
    Section IV.C uses this to justify resumming the α-coefficients; the TS generalization is asserted rather than proved.
  • ad hoc to paper The series coefficients in Table I uniquely determine exact hypergeometric resummations to all orders.
    The resummed forms in Table II are found by inspection and factorization of the first terms; no all-orders proof or closed-form derivation is given.
  • ad hoc to paper The upper integration limit in the radial action can be truncated to \bhat{u}_{max}=1+O(1/\bhat) at leading PM order without affecting the resummed result.
    Appendix B states this is 'enough' but does not justify it; the exact resummations (B14) rely on this truncation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Topological Stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GJJKH5VG

@misc{pith2026250614442,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Topological Stars and scalar wave equation: Exact resummation of the renormalized angular momentum in the eikonal limit},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GJJKH5VG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.14442}
}
abstract

We show that for a Topological Star the renormalized angular momentum parameter, $\nu$, appearing in the Mano-Suzuki-Takasugi-type or in the quantum-Seiberg-Witten-type approaches of the perturbation equations, has 1) a direct link with the geodesic radial action computed along the null orbits of the background and 2) admits an exact resummation in terms of hypergeometric functions, generalizing previous results valid in the Schwarzschild case, see Ref.[arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]].

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. 5d Schwarzschild-Tangherlini spacetime: MST-like formalism for a Reduced Confluent Heun Equation

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    An original MST-like formalism is constructed for the reduced confluent Heun radial equation of 5D Schwarzschild-Tangherlini scalars, validated by matching the renormalized angular momentum to the quantum Seiberg-Witt...

  2. From the confluent Heun equation to a new factorized and resummed gravitational waveform for circularized, nonspinning, compact binaries

    gr-qc 2026-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new resummation absorbs all test-mass logarithms and transcendental numbers into closed-form factors, leaving rational polynomial waveform corrections up to 10PN.

  3. The radial action for massive particles in spherically symmetric geometries: Exact resummation at any PM order

    gr-qc 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The massive-particle radial action and scattering angle in Schwarzschild, Schwarzschild-Tangherlini and D3-brane geometries are resummed in hypergeometric/Fox-Wright form, and the massive scalar quantum a-cycle is ide...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [19]

    Ronveaux,Heun ’s differential equationsOxford Uni- versity Press (1995)

    A. Ronveaux,Heun ’s differential equationsOxford Uni- versity Press (1995)

    work page 1995

  2. [1]

    WKB-type solutions to Eq

    wave equation in the Schwarzschild spacetime, □Ψ =g µν∇µ(∂νΨ) = 0,(2.1) for which separation of variables is obtained by looking for solutions with the angular part expressed in terms arXiv:2506.14442v1 [gr-qc] 17 Jun 2025 2 of (scalar) spherical harmonics: In addition, Fourier- transforming the time variable leads to the following (standard) decompositio...

    arXiv 2025

  3. [2]

    [36] (see Eqs

    TS: massless probe In the case of a TS spacetime and a massless probe (expressing the results in powers ofz=r s/b) we find χ(0) 0 = X i ci,0zi = 2z+ 15π 16 z2+ 16 3 z3+ 3465π 1024 z4 + 112 5 z5+ 255255π 16384 z6+ 768 7 z7+ 334639305π 4194304 z8 + 36608 63 z9 + 29113619535π 67108864 z10 + 106496 33 z11 + 10529425731825π 4294967296 z12+ 2646016 143 z13 +O z...

    work page

  4. [3]

    (A6) χis obtained by expanding in large- ˆJthe integrand (A3), and integrating then overrorder by order

    Massive probe In general, one starts from a 4D-reduced TS metric[14, 20–34] ds2|4D =−f(r)dt 2 + dr2 f(r) 1− 2M r α +r 2(dθ2 + sin2 θdϕ2),(A1) and writes the mass shell condition in Hamiltonian form for a massive probe as H(xα, pα) =−µ 2 ,(A2) yielding the following expression for the scattering angle χ= Jp E2 −µ 2 Z ∞ r1 drp (r−αr s)(r−r 1)(r−r 2)(r−r 3) ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,

    Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, M. Shibata, H. Tagoshi and T. Tanaka, “Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.128, 1-121 (1997) [arXiv:gr- qc/9712057 [gr-qc]]

    work page arXiv 1997

  6. [5]

    Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic so- lutions of the Regge-Wheeler equation and the post- Minkowskian expansion,” Prog. Theor. Phys.96, 549-566 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9605057 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 1996

  7. [6]

    Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,

    S. Mano, H. Suzuki and E. Takasugi, “Analytic solu- tions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency expansions,” Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 1079-1096 (1996) [arXiv:gr-qc/9603020 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 1996

  8. [7]

    Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation,

    M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, “Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation,” Living Rev. 15 Rel.6, 6 (2003) [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv 2003

Show all 53 references
  1. [8]

    Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theo- ries,

    N. A. Nekrasov and S. L. Shatashvili, “Quantization of Integrable Systems and Four Dimensional Gauge Theo- ries,” [arXiv:0908.4052 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  2. [9]

    Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Monopoles, duality and chiral symmetry breaking in N=2 supersymmetric QCD,” Nucl. Phys. B431, 484-550 (1994) [arXiv:hep-th/9408099 [hep- th]]

    1994 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 super- symmetric Yang-Mills theory,

    N. Seiberg and E. Witten, “Electric - magnetic duality, monopole condensation, and confinement in N=2 super- symmetric Yang-Mills theory,” Nucl. Phys. B426, 19- 52 (1994) [erratum: Nucl. Phys. B430, 485-486 (1994)] [arXiv:hep-th/9407087 [hep-th]]

    1994 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Seiberg-Witten prepotential from in- stanton counting,

    N. A. Nekrasov, “Seiberg-Witten prepotential from in- stanton counting,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.7, no.5, 831- 864 (2003) [arXiv:hep-th/0206161 [hep-th]]

    2003 arXiv

  5. [12]

    CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,

    D. Consoli, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales and R. Poghossian, “CFT description of BH’s and ECO’s: QNMs, super- radiance, echoes and tidal responses,” JHEP12, 115 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2022)115 [arXiv:2206.09437 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  6. [13]

    Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,

    G. Aminov, A. Grassi and Y. Hatsuda, “Black Hole Quasinormal Modes and Seiberg–Witten Theory,” An- nales Henri Poincare23, no.6, 1951-1977 (2022) [arXiv:2006.06111 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  7. [14]

    Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,

    G. Bonelli, C. Iossa, D. Panea Lichtig and A. Tanzini, “Irregular Liouville Correlators and Connection For- mulae for Heun Functions,” Commun. Math. Phys. 397, no.2, 635-727 (2023) doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04497- 5 [arXiv:2201.04491 [hep-th]]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [15]

    More on the SW-QNM correspondence,

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and J. F. Morales, “More on the SW-QNM correspondence,” JHEP01, 024 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2022)024 [arXiv:2109.09804 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,

    T. Damour and G. Schaefer, “Higher Order Relativistic Periastron Advances and Binary Pulsars,” Nuovo Cim. B101, 127 (1988) doi:10.1007/BF02828697

    1988 doi

  10. [17]

    Resumming Post- Minkowskian and Post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,

    A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan and R. Poghossian, “Resumming Post- Minkowskian and Post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions,” [arXiv:2501.19257 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  11. [18]

    Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar perturba- tions of topological-star spacetimes,” Phys. Rev. D110, no.8, 084077 (2024) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.084077 [arXiv:2407.10868 [gr-qc]]

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Schwarzschild- like topological solitons,

    I. Bah, P. Heidmann and P. Weck, “Schwarzschild- like topological solitons,” JHEP08, 269 (2022) [arXiv:2203.12625 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,

    L. Blanchet, “Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves,” Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014) [arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian ap- proximation,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “Gravitational scattering of two black holes at the fourth post-Newtonian ap- proximation,” Phys. Rev. D96, no.6, 064021 (2017) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.064021 [arXiv:1706.06877 [gr- qc]]

    2017 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,

    M. M. Ivanov, Y. Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and Z. Zhou, “Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravitational Wave- forms,” [arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    On the stability and deformability of top stars,

    M. Bianchi, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo, J. F. Morales and G. Sudano, “On the stability and deformability of top stars,” JHEP12, 121 (2023) [arXiv:2305.15105 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, “Topological stars, black holes and generalized charged Weyl solutions,” JHEP09, 147 (2021) [arXiv:2012.13407 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Topological Stars and Black Holes,

    I. Bah and P. Heidmann, “Topological Stars and Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett.126, no.15, 151101 (2021) [arXiv:2011.08851 [hep-th]]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Stability of topological solitons, and black string to bubble transition,

    I. Bah, A. Dey and P. Heidmann, “Stability of topological solitons, and black string to bubble transition,” JHEP 04, 168 (2022) [arXiv:2112.11474 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Non-spinning tops are stable,

    I. Bena, G. Di Russo, J. F. Morales and A. Ruip´ erez, “Non-spinning tops are stable,” [arXiv:2406.19330 [hep- th]]

    arXiv

  21. [29]

    Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,

    G. Di Russo, F. Fucito and J. F. Morales, “Tidal resonances for fuzzballs,” JHEP04, 149 (2024) doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2024)149 [arXiv:2402.06621 [hep- th]]

    2024 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Cav- ity effect in the quasinormal mode spectrum of topo- logical stars,

    P. Heidmann, N. Speeney, E. Berti and I. Bah, “Cav- ity effect in the quasinormal mode spectrum of topo- logical stars,” Phys. Rev. D108, no.2, 024021 (2023) [arXiv:2305.14412 [gr-qc]]

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Charge (in)stability and superradiance of Topological Stars,

    A. Cipriani, C. Di Benedetto, G. Di Russo, A. Grillo and G. Sudano, “Charge (in)stability and superradiance of Topological Stars,” [arXiv:2405.06566 [hep-th]]

    arXiv

  24. [32]

    Scattering angle in a Topological Star spacetime: a self-force approach,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scattering angle in a Topological Star spacetime: a self-force approach,” [arXiv:2506.04876 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    Spectroscopy of magnetized black holes and topological stars,

    A. Dima, M. Melis and P. Pani, “Spectroscopy of magnetized black holes and topological stars,” [arXiv:2406.19327 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  26. [34]

    Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,

    M. Bianchi, D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Scalar waves in a topological star spacetime: Self-force and radia- tive losses,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.4, 044017 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.044017 [arXiv:2411.19612 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Nonradial sta- bility of topological stars,

    A. Dima, M. Melis and P. Pani, “Nonradial sta- bility of topological stars,” Phys. Rev. D111, no.10, 104001 (2025) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.104001 [arXiv:2502.04444 [gr-qc]]

    2025 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,

    A. Parnachev and K. Sen, “Notes on AdS- Schwarzschild eikonal phase,” JHEP03, 289 (2021) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2021)289 [arXiv:2011.06920 [hep- th]]

    2021 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Extreme mass ratio in- spirals around topological stars,

    M. Melis, R. Brito and P. Pani, “Extreme mass ratio in- spirals around topological stars,” [arXiv:2504.16156 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a TS spacetime: PN reconstruction of the field and radiation losses in a self-force approach,

    G. Di Russo, M. Bianchi and D. Bini, “Scalar waves from unbound orbits in a TS spacetime: PN reconstruction of the field and radiation losses in a self-force approach,” [arXiv:2502.21040 [gr-qc]]

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    The radial action from probe amplitudes to all orders,

    U. Kol, D. O’connell and O. Telem, “The radial action from probe amplitudes to all orders,” JHEP03, 141 (2022) doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2022)141 [arXiv:2109.12092 [hep-th]]

    2022 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Digital library of mathematical functions,

    “Digital library of mathematical functions,” [https://dlmf.nist.gov/28]

  33. [41]

    The spin- ning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering,

    D. Akpinar, V. del Duca and R. Gonzo, “The spin- ning self-force EFT: 1SF waveform recursion relation and Compton scattering,” [arXiv:2504.02025 [hep-th]]

  34. [42]

    He and Y

    W. He and Y. G. Miao, Commun. Theor. Phys. 58, 827-834 (2012) doi:10.1088/0253-6102/58/6/08 [arXiv:1006.5185 [math-ph]]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Bianchi, D

    M. Bianchi, D. Consoli, A. Grillo and 16 J. F. Morales, Phys. Lett. B824, 136837 (2022) doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2021.136837 [arXiv:2105.04245 [hep-th]]

    2022

  36. [44]

    primitive

    (see Eq. (13.22)) and [45] (see Eq. (9.5)). One can take the eikonal limit (j→ ∞onceγ/j=x is fixed) of the above mentioned expressions obtaining III. THE RENORMALIZED ANGULAR MOMENTUMνIN THE SCHW ARZSCHILD SP ACETIME When solving the Teukolsky equation in the Schwarzschild spa...

  37. [45]

    From Boundary Data to Bound States,

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From Boundary Data to Bound States,” JHEP01, 072 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)072 [arXiv:1910.03008 [hep- th]]

    2020 arXiv

  38. [46]

    From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynam- ical invariants (with twist),

    G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From boundary data to bound states. Part II. Scattering angle to dynam- ical invariants (with twist),” JHEP02, 120 (2020) doi:10.1007/JHEP02(2020)120 [arXiv:1911.09130 [hep- th]]

    2020 arXiv

  39. [47]

    From bound- ary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,

    G. Cho, G. K¨ alin and R. A. Porto, “From bound- ary data to bound states. Part III. Radiative effects,” JHEP04, 154 (2022) [erratum: JHEP07, 002 (2022)] doi:10.1007/JHEP04(2022)154 [arXiv:2112.03976 [hep- th]]

    2022 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Binary dynam- ics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Binary dynam- ics at the fifth and fifth-and-a-half post-Newtonian orders,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.2, 024062 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024062 [arXiv:2003.11891 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,

    D. Bini, T. Damour and A. Geralico, “Sixth post- Newtonian local-in-time dynamics of binary sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. D102, no.2, 024061 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.102.024061 [arXiv:2004.05407 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    High-order post-Newtonian contributions to the two-body gravitational interac- tion potential from analytical gravitational self-force calculations,

    D. Bini and T. Damour, “High-order post-Newtonian contributions to the two-body gravitational interac- tion potential from analytical gravitational self-force calculations,” Phys. Rev. D89, no.6, 064063 (2014) doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.064063 [arXiv:1312.2503 [gr- qc]]

    2014 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Characterizing geodesic devi- ations in a Topological Star spacetime: massive, charged, spinning and stringy-like objects,

    D. Bini and G. Di Russo, “Characterizing geodesic devi- ations in a Topological Star spacetime: massive, charged, spinning and stringy-like objects,” [arXiv:2505.13020 [gr- qc]]

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Grav- itational Binding Energy in Compact Bina- ries,

    A. Pound, B. Wardell, N. Warburton and J. Miller, “Second-Order Self-Force Calculation of Grav- itational Binding Energy in Compact Bina- ries,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, no.2, 021101 (2020) doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.021101 [arXiv:1908.07419 [gr-qc]]

    2020 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Sourced met- ric perturbations of Kerr spacetime in Lorenz gauge,

    B. Wardell, C. Kavanagh and S. R. Dolan, “Sourced met- ric perturbations of Kerr spacetime in Lorenz gauge,” [arXiv:2406.12510 [gr-qc]]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.