Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 3 cited by

Dipoles and chains of solitons in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dipolar boson stars in the Einstein-FLS model are dynamically stable in a weak-gravity window, while non-rotating Q-chains are stable only as dipoles.

desk verdict A solid numerical construction paper with genuinely new solutions and a credible stability map, but the stability claim needs a convergence study and a check of non-axisymmetric modes before it can be taken as settled. read the letter →

arxiv 2411.08985 v1 pith:GKEDSMYP submitted 2024-11-13 gr-qc hep-th

Víctor Jaramillo , Shuang-Yong Zhou This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th PACS 04.40.-b11.27.+d
keywords Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-SirlinmodeldipolarbosonstarsQ-ballchainsnonlinearstabilitynumericalrelativityaxisymmetricsolitonsscalarfielddarkmatterblackholeformation
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's central claim is that the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin (FLS) model—a renormalizable two-scalar theory in which a complex field acquires mass from a real field with a broken-symmetry potential—admits static, axisymmetric two-lump boson stars that are dynamically stable. The stability is established by full three-dimensional nonlinear evolutions, which locate a stable patch around $\alpha^2 \lesssim 0.05$ with $0.1 \lesssim \mu \lesssim 0.25$ at fixed frequency $\omega = 0.9$; outside this patch the dipoles develop an instability and either relax to a spheroid or collapse to a black hole. The paper also claims that in flat spacetime with a massless real scalar ($\mu = 0$), non-rotating Q-ball chains with two, four, and six components can be constructed, and that the dipole is stable while longer chains are not. If these claims hold, the FLS model is the simplest renormalizable setting in which gravitating dipolar solitons are stable, and one of the few scalar models with non-rotating flat-space Q-chains. This matters because it shows the stabilization mechanism is a tunable scalar interaction, not a generic self-interaction or rotation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the FLS action with complex scalar $\Phi$, real scalar $\Psi$, and potential $U(\Psi)=\mu^2(\Psi^2-v^2)^2$; after rescaling, the free parameters are $\mu$ and $\alpha^2=4\pi G v^2$. Static axisymmetric dipoles are sought with $\Phi=\phi(r,\theta)e^{-i\omega t}$ odd under reflection across the equatorial plane, and $\Psi$ and the metric even, so the two lumps carry a relative $\pi$ phase that produces the repulsive force balancing gravity. The construction pipeline is a spectral elliptic solver that starts from the known Einstein-Klein-Gordon dipole in the $\mu\to\infty$ limit and decreases $\mu$ and $\alpha$; the stability verdict comes from Cauchy evolution of the full Einstein-FLS system with fourth-order finite differences and mesh refinement. Classic mass-frequency and mass-charge criteria turn out to be necessary but not sufficient, so the actual stability region is determined dynamically.

What would settle it

Evolve the Table III configuration with $\alpha^2=0.05$, $\mu=0.15$, and $\omega=0.9$ without imposing the $x\leftrightarrow -x$ and $y\leftrightarrow -y$ reflection symmetries, on finest grids of both $0.5$ and $0.25$, for $t>10^4$; the stable-region claim fails if the configuration disperses, collapses, or develops an $m\neq 0$ deformation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that the balance between gravitational attraction and the repulsion between two phase-opposed scalar lumps, which is unstable in the free Klein-Gordon case, becomes stable in the Einstein-FLS model when the real scalar field is light enough and gravity is weak enough. Full nonlinear evolutions of stationary initial data identify a finite stability island, and forced perturbations of five percent amplitude leave the dipoles oscillating about the unperturbed state with nearly unchanged frequency. For $\mu = 0$ the same odd-parity ansatz yields flat-space Q-dipoles and four- and six-component Q-chains; their energy is below the free-particle threshold, yet the four- and six-component chains decay to lower-component states under truncation or forced perturbations. The paper thus establishes both a new stable species of multipolar boson star and the existence, but not stability beyond the dipole, of non-rotating Q-chains in the standard FLS model.

Load-bearing premise

The stability classification rests on evolutions that enforce reflection symmetry across two coordinate planes and use a single fixed grid resolution, so an untested non-axisymmetric mode or a resolution-dependent artifact could change the verdict.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Stable dipolar boson stars exist in a renormalizable two-scalar theory, so multipolar equilibrium does not require ad hoc self-interactions or rotation.
  • The same model admits non-rotating flat-space Q-chains with two, four, and six components when the real scalar is massless, a configuration class not available to single-field scalar theories.
  • Chains with more than two components are unstable in the tested cases, so the dipole is the only stable static chain in this model at the frequencies explored.
  • Gravitating chains with four and six components connect continuously to the flat-space chains as $\alpha$ increases, and sufficiently compact second-branch configurations collapse to black holes with characteristic gravitational-wave and scalar bursts.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stable patch likely shrinks or shifts if non-axisymmetric perturbations or higher grid resolution are included, since the paper's evolutions assume axisymmetry; this is a testable extension, not a paper claim.
  • Because the FLS dipole is stable without rotation, the model could serve as a minimal controlled laboratory for binary-like horizonless objects in scalar dark matter and for head-on merger waveforms, extending the paper's astrophysical remark.
  • The flat-space chain construction suggests that long-range scalar mediation, not gravity, is what stacks Q-balls; probing collisions or charge-swapping dynamics of the FLS chain constituents could reveal whether the stacked equilibrium survives beyond the static sector.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper constructs static axisymmetric dipolar boson-star solutions in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin (FLS) model using the Kadath spectral elliptic solver, and studies their stability with full 3D nonlinear evolutions in the Einstein Toolkit. The authors report a region of parameter space, roughly small gravitational coupling and small real-scalar mass, in which dipolar configurations remain stable up to t=10^4 even under an explicit equatorial-plane-breaking perturbation. They also construct flat-space Q-ball dipoles and four- and six-component chains for the massless real-scalar case, and gravitating chains for nonzero coupling, finding in the tested cases that chains beyond the dipole are unstable. The central claims are the first stable dipolar configurations in this theory and the first non-rotating Q-chains in the standard FLS model.

Significance. If the stability claim is established, the paper reports a genuinely new result: stable static dipolar boson stars in the Einstein-FLS model, going beyond the known instability of EKG dipoles. The authors use direct nonlinear evolution rather than relying only on heuristic criteria, and they include consistency checks such as residual-based convergence in the elliptic solver, relative agreement of two mass definitions at the 10^-6 level, and forced perturbations through Eq. (36). The construction of flat-space non-rotating Q-chains with two, four, and six components is also a useful addition to the soliton literature. The main weakness is that the dynamical stability classification, which is the load-bearing part of the paper, rests on evolutions that impose reflection symmetry across the x and y axes and are performed at a single resolution, so non-axisymmetric modes and resolution-dependent effects are not probed.

major comments (3)
  1. [IV A and IV B] The stability classification in Table III is conditional on the imposed reflection symmetries. The grid setup in Sec. IV A states that 'we impose symmetry along both the x and y axes.' For a scalar perturbation with angular dependence cos(mφ), reflection across x sends φ to -φ and leaves cos(mφ) unchanged, while reflection across y sends φ to π-φ and multiplies cos(mφ) by (-1)^m; the combined symmetry therefore excludes all odd-m modes, in particular m=1. The check of axisymmetry by comparing the x=0 and y=0 planes in Sec. IV B is internal to this symmetric subspace and cannot detect an m=1 instability. The perturbation in Eq. (36) is axisymmetric, so it likewise does not probe the excluded sector. Since an odd-m instability would invalidate the stable entries of Table III, the central claim requires either evolutions without the imposed reflection symmetries or an explicit demonstration that the excluded modes are stable.
  2. [IV A and IV B] No convergence study is reported for the time evolutions. All evolutions in Sec. IV A use a single finest resolution Δx=0.5, and the stability classifications in Tables II and III and in Fig. 6 are based on finite-time evolutions up to t=10^4. Without a comparison at higher and lower resolutions, or with a different refinement setup, truncation error could either seed a spurious instability or mask a slowly growing one. A convergence study for at least one representative stable configuration (e.g., the first row of Table III) and one representative unstable configuration would be needed to make the stability boundary quantitative.
  3. [V A, Conclusion, Abstract] The abstract states that 'chains beyond the dipole case are found to be unstable,' but the manuscript's own body is more qualified. Section V A reports that the unperturbed chains were evolved only up to t=2000 and states 'due to the limited evolution time considered, it remains unclear whether these configurations will eventually settle into any of the corresponding lower-component equilibrium states'; it also says 'we do not rule out the possibility that other chains with kz>1 might exhibit stability.' The conclusion itself says 'at least for the parameters explored here.' The unqualified abstract wording therefore goes beyond what the presented simulations support, and either the abstract should carry the same qualification or additional longer evolutions and parameter scans are needed.
minor comments (6)
  1. [IV B] The sentence 'All these configurations start to develop an instability before t ~ 2000 but not after t ~ 500' is ambiguous; it should clarify that the onset is between approximately t=500 and t=2000.
  2. [Eq. (36)] The notation max(Φ) should be defined, since Φ is complex; the text likely means max(|Φ|) or the maximum of the real part, and this should be stated explicitly.
  3. [Tables II and III] The captions refer to the 'value of μ in bold,' but in the rendered tables the entries appear as braced lists without visible bold formatting; the intended emphasis should be made explicit.
  4. [III] Near the end of Sec. III, the sentence 'Many, bosonic star configurations that possess stable solutions' contains a grammatical error and should be rewritten.
  5. [Eq. (34)] Equation (34) has an empty sub-equation label (34d) and an extra blank line; this should be cleaned up.
  6. [V A] The quoted maximum values of μ for which flat-space dipolar solutions were constructed, namely μ=0.1379 for ω=0.9, μ=0.1964 for ω=0.8, and μ=1.200 for ω=0.7, are startlingly non-monotonic in ω; the authors should verify or explain this apparent jump.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: stability and existence claims are determined by direct numerical solution and evolution, not by fitting or self-referential definitions.

full rationale

The paper's central claims—existence of dipolar Einstein-FLS solitons, their dynamical stability in a parameter region, and flat-space Q-chains—are established by solving the coupled elliptic PDEs with a spectral solver and by evolving the resulting initial data with a 3D numerical relativity code. None of these claims is defined in terms of the quantity it is supposed to predict. The heuristic stability criteria (mass-frequency and mass-charge relations) are used only to select candidate configurations, and the paper explicitly states that they are necessary but not sufficient: "While we confirm that the two previously established stability criteria are necessary for achieving perturbatively stable solutions, we find that they are not sufficient for all values of the parameters \mu and \alpha." This directly rules out a fitted-input-called-prediction reading. The flat-space chains are obtained by numerical continuation from self-gravitating dipoles to \alpha = 0 and by Newton-Raphson convergence to solutions of the field equations, with accuracy checked by virial and mass-definition errors; they are not assumed by construction. The only self-citation, [24], is invoked for technical details of implementing the Hamiltonian-constraint perturbation, not as load-bearing evidence for existence or stability. The manuscript also flags its own limitations—finite evolution times for chains ("the unperturbed configurations were evolved only up to t = 2000") and deferred stability studies ("a comprehensive exploration of the parameter space is deferred to future work")—which are honesty about provisionality, not circularity. Potential concerns about excluded non-axisymmetric perturbation modes or lack of a convergence study are correctness risks, not circular reductions. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with respect to its own predictive content.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, mediators, forces, or dimensions are introduced; all configurations use the existing Phi and Psi fields of the FLS action. The free parameters are the theory's dimensionless couplings plus numerical continuation and perturbation choices. The main burdens are the finite-time stability interpretation and the symmetry-restricted evolution grid.

free parameters (5)
  • alpha^2 (gravitational coupling) = scan: 0.00625 to 0.25
    Free parameter of the rescaled theory, alpha^2 = 4 pi G v^2; the stability region depends on it.
  • mu (real scalar mass parameter) = scan: 0 to 0.5
    Free parameter controlling the mass and range of the real scalar field; the stability region depends on it.
  • omega (scalar field frequency) = 0.9 primary, 0.8 secondary
    Determined by boundary conditions but used as a continuation parameter to label solution families.
  • N0 (central lapse) = 0.9404
    Shooting parameter in the Newton-Raphson solver to avoid the vacuum solution; gauge choice rather than physical input.
  • a (perturbation amplitude) = 0.05
    Hand-chosen strength of the symmetry-breaking perturbation used to test robustness; does not enter the equilibrium claim.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption The action (1) with potential (2) and Einstein equations (4)-(7) define the theory under study.
    This is the model being tested; no derivation from a more fundamental theory is offered.
  • domain assumption The static axisymmetric ansatz (13)-(14) and boundary conditions (15)-(18) capture the relevant solutions.
    Restricts to non-rotating, parity-odd configurations; other solution families may exist.
  • domain assumption Known EKG dipolar boson stars [16,17] exist and can be used as starting points and limits.
    The paper relies on cited numerical solutions to seed the FLS sequence and to define the mu -> infinity limit.
  • ad hoc to paper The Kadath spectral solver converges to the true elliptic solution when the residual drops below 10^-8.
    No convergence proof is given; the residual threshold is a numerical pragma.
  • ad hoc to paper Evolution times of t=10^4 (dipoles) and t=2000 (chains) are long enough to classify stability.
    Stability is assessed from finite-time evolutions, not from spectral analysis of all perturbation modes.
  • ad hoc to paper Reflection symmetry across the x and y axes during evolution does not exclude relevant instabilities.
    The grid symmetries suppress non-axisymmetric perturbations; only axisymmetric instability is verified.
  • standard math The U(1) Noether charge Q in Eq. (3) is conserved and can be used to label solutions.
    Standard conservation law from the global U(1) symmetry; no extra physical input.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dipoles and chains of solitons in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GKEDSMYP

@misc{pith2026241108985,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dipoles and chains of solitons in the Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GKEDSMYP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2411.08985}
}
read the original abstract

We construct static axisymmetric multisolitons in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model. This theory features a complex scalar field which gains mass through its interaction with a real scalar field that has a non-zero vacuum expectation value. By performing three-dimensional numerical relativity simulations, we identify stable dipolar boson stars in specific regions of the parameter space. Based on the dipole results, non-rotating odd parity chains with and without gravity can also be constructed when the mass of the real scalar field is sufficiently small. However, chains beyond the dipole case are found to be unstable.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2411.08985 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Proper distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Mass-frequency diagram for FLS dipoles for three selected cases of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (13 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Spherical Klein-Gordon and FLS boson stars with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. A stable dipole with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Stability region for dipolar [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Stable dipole corresponding to the first row configuration in Table [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Surface integral of the real part of the scalar field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Two static Q-balls in equilibrium. Sequence of solutions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Q-chains with two, four and six components ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Parity-odd Q-chains. Sequence of equilibrium solutions for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Development of the instability for the unperturbed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Evolutions of two, four, and six component chains with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Gravitating chains with two, four and six components for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Compactness of gravitating chains for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Gravitational and scalar wave of a the collapsing 6 component chain with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_16.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quantum fields in boson star spacetime

    gr-qc 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In boson star spacetimes, the renormalized quantum stress tensor has mostly positive energy density and negative radial pressure that grow with curvature, rivaling the classical stress in the most compact solutions.

  2. Bifurcations in Bosonic Stars: chains and rings from spherical solutions

    gr-qc 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Zero-modes of spherical bosonic stars under axisymmetric perturbations explain the bifurcations into chain, ring, and gyroscope-like bosonic star families.

  3. Non-topological solitons and quasi-solitons

    hep-th 2024-11 accept novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comprehensive review of non-topological solitons (Q-balls) and quasi-solitons (oscillons), their properties, dynamics, and roles in early-universe physics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [17]

    Two boson stars in equilibrium,

    P. Cunha, C. Herdeiro, E. Radu, and Ya. Shnir, “Two boson stars in equilibrium,” Phys. Rev. D 106, 124039 (2022), arXiv:2210.01833 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  2. [21]

    Chains of rotating boson stars,

    Romain Gervalle, “Chains of rotating boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 124052 (2022), arXiv:2206.03982 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  3. [1]

    Klein-Gordon Geon,

    David J. Kaup, “Klein-Gordon Geon,” Phys. Rev. 172, 1331–1342 (1968)

    work page 1968

  4. [2]

    Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,

    Remo Ruffini and Silvano Bonazzola, “Systems of selfgravitating particles in general relativity and the concept of an equation of state,” Phys. Rev. 187, 1767–1783 (1969)

    work page 1969

  5. [3]

    Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,

    Gerald Rosen, “Particlelike Solutions to Nonlinear Complex Scalar Field Theories with Positive-Definite Energy Densities,” J. Math. Phys. 9, 996 (1968). 34

    work page 1968

  6. [4]

    A Class of Scalar-Field Soliton Solutions in Three Space Dimensions,

    R. Friedberg, T. D. Lee, and A. Sirlin, “A Class of Scalar-Field Soliton Solutions in Three Space Dimensions,” Phys. Rev. D 13, 2739–2761 (1976)

    work page 1976

  7. [5]

    Q-balls,

    Sidney R. Coleman, “Q-balls,” Nucl. Phys. B 262, 263 (1985), [Addendum: Nucl.Phys.B 269, 744 (1986)]

    work page 1985

  8. [6]

    Q-balls without a potential,

    V. Loiko, I. Perapechka, and Ya. Shnir, “Q-balls without a potential,” Phys. Rev. D 98, 045018 (2018), arXiv:1805.11929 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2018

Show all 59 references
  1. [7]

    Q-balls in the U (1) gauged Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,

    V. Loiko and Ya Shnir, “Q-balls in the U (1) gauged Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,” Phys. Lett. B 797, 134810 (2019), arXiv:1906.01943 [hep-th]

    2019 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Superradiance of Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin Q-balls (in preparation),

    Qi-Xin Xie, Guo-Dong Zhang, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Superradiance of Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin Q-balls (in preparation),” (2024)

    2024

  3. [9]

    Kerr black holes with synchronised scalar hair and bo- son stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,

    J. Kunz, I. Perapechka, and Ya Shnir, “Kerr black holes with synchronised scalar hair and bo- son stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin model,” JHEP 07, 109 (2019), arXiv:1904.13379 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  4. [10]

    U(1) gauged boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin model,

    J. Kunz, V. Loiko, and Ya. Shnir, “U(1) gauged boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin model,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 085013 (2022), arXiv:2112.06626 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Static boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin theory and their astrophysical images,

    Pedro L. Brito de S´ a, Haroldo C. D. Lima, Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, and Lu ´ ıs C. B. Crispino, “Static boson stars in the Einstein-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin theory and their astrophysical images,” (2024), arXiv:2406.02695 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [12]

    Proca-Higgs balls and stars in a UV completion for Proca self-interactions,

    Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Etevaldo dos Santos Costa Filho, “Proca-Higgs balls and stars in a UV completion for Proca self-interactions,” JCAP 05, 022 (2023), arXiv:2301.04172 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Charged hairy black holes in the gauged Einstein-Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin model,

    Jutta Kunz and Ya. Shnir, “Charged hairy black holes in the gauged Einstein-Friedberg-Lee- Sirlin model,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 104062 (2023), arXiv:2303.16562 [hep-th]

    2023 arXiv

  8. [14]

    Hairy dyonic Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes in an Einstein-Maxwell-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin type model,

    Jutta Kunz, Victor Loiko, and Yakov Shnir, “Hairy dyonic Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes in an Einstein-Maxwell-Friedberg-Lee-Sirlin type model,” (2024), arXiv:2407.21463 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  9. [15]

    Multipolar boson stars: macroscopic Bose-Einstein condensates akin to hydrogen orbitals,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, J. Kunz, I. Perapechka, E. Radu, and Ya. Shnir, “Multipolar boson stars: macroscopic Bose-Einstein condensates akin to hydrogen orbitals,” Phys. Lett. B 812, 136027 (2021), arXiv:2008.10608 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  10. [16]

    New static axisymmetric and nonvacuum solutions in general relativity: Equilibrium solutions of boson stars,

    Shijun Yoshida and Yoshiharu Eriguchi, “New static axisymmetric and nonvacuum solutions in general relativity: Equilibrium solutions of boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D 55, 1994–2001 (1997). 35

    1997

  11. [18]

    Multifield, Multifrequency Bosonic Stars and a Stabilization Mechanism,

    Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Fabrizio Di Giovanni, Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Jos´ e A. Font, “Multifield, Multifrequency Bosonic Stars and a Stabilization Mechanism,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 241105 (2021), arXiv:2103.12136 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  12. [19]

    Self- interacting dipolar boson stars and their dynamics,

    Pedro Ildefonso, Miguel Zilh˜ ao, Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, and Nuno M. Santos, “Self- interacting dipolar boson stars and their dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D 108, 064011 (2023), arXiv:2307.00044 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Chains of mini-boson stars,

    Shi-Xian Sun, Li Zhao, and Yong-Qiang Wang, “Chains of mini-boson stars,” JHEP 08, 152 (2023), arXiv:2210.09265 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Chains of Rotating mini-Boson Stars,

    Shi-Xian Sun and Yong-Qiang Wang, “Chains of Rotating mini-Boson Stars,” (2023), arXiv:2312.16921 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Chains of Boson Stars,

    C. A. R. Herdeiro, J. Kunz, I. Perapechka, E. Radu, and Y. Shnir, “Chains of Boson Stars,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 065009 (2021), arXiv:2101.06442 [gr-qc]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Complex structures of boson stars and anisotropic distribution of satellite galaxies,

    V ´ ıctor Jaramillo and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Complex structures of boson stars and anisotropic distribution of satellite galaxies,” Phys. Rev. D 110, 084069 (2024), arXiv:2407.12084 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Charge-Swapping Q-balls,

    Edmund J. Copeland, Paul M. Saffin, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Charge-Swapping Q-balls,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 231603 (2014), arXiv:1409.3232 [hep-th]

    2014 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Charge-Swapping Q-balls and Their Lifetimes,

    Qi-Xin Xie, Paul M. Saffin, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Charge-Swapping Q-balls and Their Lifetimes,” JHEP 07, 062 (2021), arXiv:2101.06988 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Charge-swapping Q-balls in a logarithmic potential and Affleck-Dine condensate fragmentation,

    Si-Yuan Hou, Paul M. Saffin, Qi-Xin Xie, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Charge-swapping Q-balls in a logarithmic potential and Affleck-Dine condensate fragmentation,” JHEP 07, 060 (2022), arXiv:2202.08392 [hep-ph]

    2022 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum corrected Q-ball dynamics,

    Qi-Xin Xie, Paul M. Saffin, Anders Tranberg, and Shuang-Yong Zhou, “Quantum corrected Q-ball dynamics,” JHEP 01, 165 (2024), arXiv:2312.01139 [hep-th]

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Two Schwarzschild-like black holes balanced by their scalar hair,

    Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu, “Two Schwarzschild-like black holes balanced by their scalar hair,” Phys. Rev. D 107, 064044 (2023), arXiv:2302.00016 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Two Spinning Black Holes Balanced by Their Syn- chronized Scalar Hair,

    Carlos A. R. Herdeiro and Eugen Radu, “Two Spinning Black Holes Balanced by Their Syn- chronized Scalar Hair,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 121401 (2023), arXiv:2305.15467 [gr-qc]. 36

    2023 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Chains of Interacting Solitons,

    Yakov M. Shnir, “Chains of Interacting Solitons,” Symmetry 13, 284 (2021), arXiv:2101.07552 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A Monopole - anti-monopole solution of the SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs model,

    Burkhard Kleihaus and Jutta Kunz, “A Monopole - anti-monopole solution of the SU(2) Yang-Mills-Higgs model,” Phys. Rev. D 61, 025003 (2000), arXiv:hep-th/9909037

    2000 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Sphalerons in the Skyrme model,

    Steffen Krusch and Paul Sutcliffe, “Sphalerons in the Skyrme model,” J. Phys. A 37, 9037 (2004), arXiv:hep-th/0407002

    2004 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Q-chains in the U (1) gauged Friedberg- Lee-Sirlin model,

    Viktor Loiko, Ilya Perapechka, and Yakov Shnir, “Q-chains in the U (1) gauged Friedberg- Lee-Sirlin model,” EPL 133, 41001 (2021), arXiv:2012.01052 [hep-th]

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Axisymmetric rotating rel- ativistic bodies: A new numerical approach for ’exact’ solutions,

    S. Bonazzola, E. Gourgoulhon, M. Salgado, and J. A. Marck, “Axisymmetric rotating rel- ativistic bodies: A new numerical approach for ’exact’ solutions,” Astron. Astrophys. 278, 421–443 (1993)

    1993

  28. [36]

    Kadath libray,

    Philippe Grandclement, “Kadath libray,” (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Kadath: A Spectral solver for theoretical physics,

    Philippe Grandclement, “Kadath: A Spectral solver for theoretical physics,” J. Comput. Phys. 229, 3334–3357 (2010), arXiv:0909.1228 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Wald, General Relativity (Chicago Univ

    Robert M. Wald, General Relativity (Chicago Univ. Pr., Chicago, USA, 1984)

    1984

  31. [39]

    An Introduction to the theory of rotating relativistic stars,

    Eric Gourgoulhon, “An Introduction to the theory of rotating relativistic stars,” in CompStar 2010: School and Workshop on Computational Tools for Compact Star Astrophysics(2010) arXiv:1003.5015 [gr-qc]

    2010 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Dynamical boson stars,

    Steven L. Liebling and Carlos Palenzuela, “Dynamical boson stars,” Living Rev. Rel. 26, 1 (2023), arXiv:1202.5809 [gr-qc]

    2023 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Exotic compact objects: a recent numerical- relativity perspective,

    Miguel Bezares and Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, “Exotic compact objects: a recent numerical- relativity perspective,” (2024), arXiv:2406.04901 [gr-qc]

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Gravitational Stability of Scalar Matter,

    Marcelo Gleiser and Richard Watkins, “Gravitational Stability of Scalar Matter,” Nucl. Phys. B 319, 733–746 (1989)

    1989

  35. [43]

    Stability of Charged Boson Stars,

    P. Jetzer, “Stability of Charged Boson Stars,” Phys. Lett. B 231, 433–438 (1989)

    1989

  36. [44]

    Numerical evolutions of spherical Proca stars,

    Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Carlos Herdeiro, Eugen Radu, Juan Carlos Degollado, and Jos´ e A. Font, “Numerical evolutions of spherical Proca stars,” Phys. Rev. D 95, 104028 (2017), arXiv:1702.04532 [gr-qc]

    2017 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Stability of rotating scalar boson stars with nonlinear interactions,

    Nils Siemonsen and William E. East, “Stability of rotating scalar boson stars with nonlinear interactions,” Phys. Rev. D 103, 044022 (2021), arXiv:2011.08247 [gr-qc]. 37

    2021 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Einstein Toolkit: Open software for relativistic astrophysics,

    EinsteinToolkit, “Einstein Toolkit: Open software for relativistic astrophysics,” http:// einsteintoolkit.org/

  39. [47]

    The Einstein Toolkit: A Community Computational Infrastructure for Relativistic Astrophysics,

    Frank Loffler et al., “The Einstein Toolkit: A Community Computational Infrastructure for Relativistic Astrophysics,” Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 115001 (2012), arXiv:1111.3344 [gr-qc]

    2012 arXiv

  40. [48]

    An Introduction to the Einstein Toolkit,

    Miguel Zilh˜ ao and Frank L¨ offler, “An Introduction to the Einstein Toolkit,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28, 1340014 (2013), arXiv:1305.5299 [gr-qc]

    2013 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Evolutions in 3-D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement,

    Erik Schnetter, Scott H. Hawley, and Ian Hawke, “Evolutions in 3-D numerical relativity using fixed mesh refinement,” Class. Quant. Grav. 21, 1465–1488 (2004), arXiv:gr-qc/0310042

    2004 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Nonlinear Dynamics of Spinning Bosonic Stars: Formation and Stability,

    N. Sanchis-Gual, F. Di Giovanni, M. Zilh˜ ao, C. Herdeiro, P. Cerd´ a-Dur´ an, J. A. Font, and E. Radu, “Nonlinear Dynamics of Spinning Bosonic Stars: Formation and Stability,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 221101 (2019), arXiv:1907.12565 [gr-qc]

    2019 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Dynamicalℓ -boson stars: Generic stability and evidence for nonspherical solutions,

    V ´ ıctor Jaramillo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Juan Barranco, Argelia Bernal, Juan Carlos Degol- lado, Carlos Herdeiro, and Dar ´ ıo N´ u˜ nez, “Dynamicalℓ -boson stars: Generic stability and evidence for nonspherical solutions,” Phys. Rev. D 101, 124020 (2020), arXiv:2004.08459 [gr- qc]

    2020 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Head-on collisions ofℓ-boson stars,

    V ´ ıctor Jaramillo, Nicolas Sanchis-Gual, Juan Barranco, Argelia Bernal, Juan Carlos Degol- lado, Carlos Herdeiro, Miguel Megevand, and Dar ´ ıo N´ u˜ nez, “Head-on collisions ofℓ-boson stars,” Phys. Rev. D 105, 104057 (2022), arXiv:2202.00696 [gr-qc]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [53]

    General Relativistic Collapse to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Black Holes,

    T. Nakamura, K. Oohara, and Y. Kojima, “General Relativistic Collapse to Black Holes and Gravitational Waves from Black Holes,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 90, 1–218 (1987)

    1987

  46. [54]

    Evolution of three-dimensional gravitational waves: Harmonic slicing case,

    Masaru Shibata and Takashi Nakamura, “Evolution of three-dimensional gravitational waves: Harmonic slicing case,” Phys. Rev. D 52, 5428–5444 (1995)

    1995

  47. [55]

    Tur- duckening black holes: An Analytical and computational study,

    J. David Brown, Peter Diener, Olivier Sarbach, Erik Schnetter, and Manuel Tiglio, “Tur- duckening black holes: An Analytical and computational study,” Phys. Rev. D 79, 044023 (2009), arXiv:0809.3533 [gr-qc]

    2009 arXiv

  48. [56]

    Alcubierre, Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (OUP Oxford, 2008)

    M. Alcubierre, Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity, International Series of Monographs on Physics (OUP Oxford, 2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Virial identities in relativistic gravity: 1D effective actions and the role of boundary terms,

    Carlos A. R. Herdeiro, Jo˜ ao M. S. Oliveira, Alexandre M. Pombo, and Eugen Radu, “Virial identities in relativistic gravity: 1D effective actions and the role of boundary terms,” Phys. Rev. D 104, 104051 (2021), arXiv:2109.05027 [gr-qc]. 38

    2021 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    Yakov M. Shnir, Topological and Non-Topological Solitons in Scalar Field Theories(Cambridge University Press, 2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    Finding apparent horizons in numerical relativity,

    Jonathan Thornburg, “Finding apparent horizons in numerical relativity,” Phys. Rev. D 54, 4899–4918 (1996), arXiv:gr-qc/9508014

    1996 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.